วีดีโอ

yes!

Hi, please join the discord in the description, you'll find all info on that there

Hi! It depends on a game. Personally, I'm not a Unity developer so can't tell. BUT there are a few simple rules - is it a single player game? Is it DX12 game? Does it have DLSS/DLSS FG? If so, there's no STOP sign to try to mod that game

Works too!

Hi, look on Nexus or join the Discord server you can find in the description to talk to Artur or find a list of files to remove - don't remove any folders yet! Did you install DLL option on a modded game?

Just tested now: DLL module conflicts with CET mods, WINMM module conflicts with RED4ext scripts, ASI module works perfectly fine.

bro, you mad?

it's so shady it's available on Nexus and thousands of people are using it already

Hi! You can check another video on my channel where a beta Nukem's for AMD is generating 30 fps from 15 on a RX 7800XT in Cyberpunk. If you're not getting generated frames, it's a bug that happens in certain conditions. You can always ask for help on discord or nexus , also, there is a compatibility sheet in this video's description

Try the Luke Fz 10.4 mod in cyberpunk. I have a gtx1660ti, and frame generation works fine with that mod. it plays great.

Yes, it should but please read the video description - look for compatibility sheet to check which games work and which don't

A proper multiplication of frames ;D But yes, you can in most games

it will 100%

Hey, people used/still use FSR3 FG with MSFS2020 as far as I know, personally I don't own it. But the sim won't be affected in such way :)

It does!

so true me too

From which site you download mods and frame generation enabler

So I have my Cyberpunk with 40+ mods on GTX 1650, so should I download the DLL module or ASI module?

There was no HUD ghosting in Witcher 3 with this mod during tests - are you using DLSS Enabler?

You don't like the name of the mod but you dislike the video, let it be! :) But we're happy that you're enjoying the mod functionality however!

@@scz_g It's a technicality where the video is technically not clickbait but either way I got baited.

@@FatheredPuma81 what do you expect ? GTX cards doesnt even have Tensor cores

@@Eleganttf2 Literally what I typed????????????

Hi, if a game doesn't have a native DLSS upscaler, the mod won't work, unfortunately; the same goes for frame generation option (DX12 is needed)

You can find instructions on the mod's Nexus page but I don't think you need to uninstall the mod to update the game

Yes,why would DLSS work without GPU having hardware required?

@@virenrana6459the mod kinda suggests it, and so does the video intro. Calling it DLSS Replacer would be more accurate. Edit: Now he added "(Replaces DLSS with FSR3 and XeSS)" to the video title.

@@EVPointMaster I think you must have missed a lot of explicit information provided here. The very first sentence on Nexus page for this mod states as follows: "Simulate DLSS Upscaler and DLSS-G Frame Generation features on any DirectX 12 compatible GPU in any DirectX 12 game that supports DLSS2 and DLSS3 natively." Also, just below the splash screen on that page, it lists all the features as follows: "Enables DLSS Upscaler option (by simulating it through XeSS/FSR2) in all games supporting DLSS 2/3 upscaling on unsupported hardware like AMD, Intel or older NVIDIA GPUs" and "Enables DLSS-G Frame Generation option (by simulating it through FSR3) in all games supporting DLSS 3 on unsupported GPUs from AMD, Intel and NVIDIA" I think then that mod suggests that its not an actual DLSS, the same is true for the video, just look at the first line of its description: "Artur's DLSS Enabler makes Nukem's DLSSG-To-FSR3 mod available for GPUs other than RTX20/30 and adds Nitec's CyberXeSS (XeSS/FSR upscaling). "

@@virenrana6459 the card has cuda cores, dlss requires cuda to work.

​@@HamguyBacondoesn't DLSS require RT / Tensor cores and not CUDA?

I believe everyone should test it themselves; some will like it, some won't I agree with most of your points! However the problem with frame pacing usually turns out to be caused by carelessly coded games (it was observed during works on the mod), not by FSR3 FG itself or FG mods

I agree, if you are bit below 60fps you will see feel the best improvement in smoothness and responsiveness. The responsiveness will be affected about the same at plus 50fps as around 60fps.

@@scz_gI hope people aren't fooled by buggy implementations. I did notice built in frame generation was broken on some games. While the framerate went up, it did not feel as responsive. This was able to be fixed with lukefz fsr3 mod somehow once installed. This affected Last of Us Part 1 and Pandora. Pandora was good a bit ago but the recent patch broke it. It may be fixed again. I'll have to try out enabler as well.

Let me quote AMD - the authors of FSR3: "AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) technology uses a combination of super resolution temporal upscaling technology and frame generation to deliver a massive increase in framerates in supported games." . So no, its not "Fluid Motion Frames" as you said;)

Thank you for info! We'll try to test it, however that game is heavily DRM-ed due to its online features; mods tend to not work with such games :(

Nice! From what I know the oldest supported GTX cards from NVIDIA are 10 year old 800 series (based on Maxwell architecture)

Will definitely give this a shot on my 960 SSC then!

it feels the same because it's fake frames from framegen. you're not actually getting any benefit from it. I tested it earlier with Cyberpunk on my gtx 1080, 60-70fps without it and 150fps with it on, but it still felt the same. enabling fps cap at 60 it will still cap at 120fps that's how i worked it out.

@@Velakor9150 DLSSG and FSR3 are about increasing an image smoothness, not latency. If you can't tell the difference with FG on its because the FPS is already too high for your eyes to perceive the difference.

@@Velakor9150 the game feels worse for me because: 1)you need to have a good enough frame rate before you activate frame gen for it to feel better and in my case since my frame rate is already low and my GPU takes already a long time to render a new frame, adding frame gen makes it all worse since now I have to wait for 2 frames to be crated instead of 1 before they can be displayed and so the already long latency gets even longer. 2)frame gen is mainly used for when the CPU is a bottleneck so that the gpu can create a new frame without waiting for the CPU and in my case my GPU is the bottleneck 3)since msfs is a simulation game and not with a lot of fast motion and with motion blur on a cinematic 24 fps is enough. And in your case unless you have a high refresh rate monitor you won't be able to see the difference and capping your frame rate in your case seems to only cap how many frames are rendered. It says 120 fps because your gpu is going to render 60 fps and then in between each of them add 1 generated frame and so 60 generated fps and 60 rendered frames + 60 generated ones =120. Also people call generated frames "fake" because they are not actually accurate calculated/rendered frames but a generated estimate/guess of what the fame should look like based on the previous and next frame.

Well, this kind of capability requires a risky patching the UEFI BIOS or using customized Linux OS.

AFAIK Nvidia GPU's don' even benefit from resizable bar, since it's disabled in driver for majority of games anyway.

@@aargoth82 If my motherboard already have the resizeable bar option (it's set to auto) then should I patch the motherboard still?