WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 7 - Cross Exam of Kyle Rittenhouse - Defendant Part 1
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2021
- Live Coverage: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse - Kenosha Shooting
Happening in Court:
Direct Exam of Kyle Rittenhouse - Defendant
Charges:
1. First Degree Reckless Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Joseph Rosenbaum)
2. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Richard
McGinnis, reporter for Daily Caller, not injured but near Rosenbaum when Rittenhoue
fired)
3. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (unknown male)
4. First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Anthony Huber)
5. Attempt First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Gaige
Grosskreutz)
6. Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person under the Age of 18
7. DISMISSED AT THE END OF STATE'S CASE. Prosecution failed to put evidence in front of the jury that there was a lawful curfew in place (appears to be an oversight by prosecution) Defense moved to dismiss, judge agreed. Fail to Comply with Order of Local Government - Emergency Management Activity (citation, carries no penalty) - everyone present was breaking the 7pm curfew issued by the sheriff.
Possible Sentence: Max: Life in Prison Without Parole (WI does not have the DP)
JURY CHOSEN IN ONE DAY. 20 jurors have been selected in WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse. 9 men and 11 women. (8 are alternates)
Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 26, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27. Prosecutors say that Rittenhouse, then 17 and from Illinois, was a vigilante looking for a fight. He, like other right-wingers, went to Kenosha, Wisconsin ostensibly to protect property. This happened as protests over police shooting local man Jacob Blake turned violent. Rittenhouse’s attorneys assert he was acting in self-defense. This case became a cause célèbre among conservatives.
Prosecutors have struggled in court, failing to introduce evidence of prior aggressive behavior. This included evidence showing him attacking a woman who was in an altercation with his sister. The other is that he was closely linked to the violent, far-right Proud Boys organization.
Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder said an appellate court would reverse him if he allowed these in trial. The evidence was too prejudicial, he said. He left it up in the air whether he would allow footage showing someone identified as Rittenhouse discussing a Black man exiting a CVS pharmacy. Rittenhouse believed the man was shoplifting.
#KyleRittenhouse #KenoshaShooting
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on TH-camTV!
tv.th-cam.com/users/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
Who To Follow On Twitter:
@LawCrimeNetwork
@LawCrimeVerdict
@Cathy Russon
@AddiTrialsStuff - บันเทิง
![ทททททททท #27 [หลุยส์ เค โตมายังไง ณ สระบุรี]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CaKoYw_Xmtg/mqdefault.jpg)
Prosecutor Binger: "Let me ask you the same question 317 times and see if you give me a different answer."
Let's put it this way, do I have to ask you the same question 317xs until you give a answer, YES OR NO.
😆😅🤣
The bald guy did bring up pixels a million times. He's creepy.
That's a cross examination fktard
Not one man stopped this child from running his life.
Prosecutor: Do you have a spare tire in your car?
Kyle: Yes
Prosecutor: So you were expecting to get a flat?
Kyle: No.
Prosecutor: Then why did you have a spare tire if you weren't expecting to get a flat?
Classic comment... 🤣😂🤣 So thankful the jury saw through the prosecutor's badgering and fairy tale scenarios...
Yeah the rifle was for just in case. I’m sure he didn’t want to shoot anyone😏 Rittenhouse supporters are low iq
“How dare you put out fires in your community. Let them burn, regardless of the damage caused to any buildings. How dare you”! That’s what the jury is hearing from this prosecutor.
My jaw dropped. Whatever else is true, how are they gonna say that the kid was wrong to try to stop fires and give people help...what weird hellish demension is this
who's community? it was not Rittenhouse's community. he was one state away from his community. he had no buisness in Kenosha at all .
@@frankmarcia5956 bro, his father lived there…..are you following the same case?
It was less than a 20 minute drive from his house. His dad and grandma live there, he has friends there, he worked there in the past
@@frankmarcia5956 what business did the rioters have in Kenosha?
And he lives on the border. Suddenly liberals care about people crossing borders when it suits their ignorant agenda.
"Why would you wear a seatbelt if you didn't think you where going to crash your car?" asked the puzzled prosecutor.
😆😅🤣
Outstanding comparison, sir! Please let me borrow that.
Um... because it's the law? I remember riding around in the back of a pickup truck without even a seat when I was a kid - you know, because my parents didn't think anything would happen
@@davidfrykenberg5847 My man, I'm not saying you shouldn't wear your seatbelt! It's a mock comparison to Mr. Binger insisting the only reason Mr. Rittenhouse would have a gun is because he thought he was going to have to shoot someone that night.
Like a seatbelt, it's a precaution you aren't expecting you'll need but you want to be prepared for an event in which you do.
@@davidfrykenberg5847 and that law is unconstitutional! I have the right not to wear a seatbelt, we need to push government control out of our lives! They control too much of it! before long they are gonna tell me I can only drink one cup of coffee and more is illegal.
This prosecutor is why no one wants to help anyone anymore. Having civic sense and a sense of responsibility in your community is painted as a bad thing.
Going with a gun you can't legally hold to enforce authority you don't have isn't the new order I want. But thankfully we won't be living in your dystopian nightmare anytime soon
@@jima28080 Whatever you have to make up to feel like a victim.
"But all these people, protesting the police, damaging and burning property, both public and private, did not want or need you there. If you saw someone destroying property in this riot, why did you not just call 911?*
@@ryanbailey3176 The last things we need is idiots like you thinking they have authority.
@@jaredkronk4614 In what way was he trying to “enforce authority”? Based on all the videos shown during the trial thus far, the only command he uttered the entire night was to tell his attackers to “get back” and “stop” when they tried to kill him.
I don't trust Littlefinger
i was thinking that exact same thing. he looks just like him
It wasn't until I saw this comment that something was odd about his appearance. Even Littlefinger found his end when his tricks failed.
Lol he does look like Littlefinger
How do honest Democrats look at guys like Binger, Strzok, or McCabe and not recognize the obvious parallels with fictional characters of the same evil lobbyist/diplomat/powerbroker archetype like Littlefinger or Saruman?
I almost cried laughing when I saw somebody refered to him as littlefinger... and I was like ... dude I knew I know him from somewhere!!! 😂😂😂
its even funnier when you see that similarities don't end on how they look... they both corrupted scumbags with no moral 😂
*video shows Kyle firing only after running away and being attacked*
Prosecutor: yeah but it wasn't self defense becuz he said he wanted a gun a while ago
What a circus
WHAT YOU SEEM TO SKIP IS
WHY HE WALK TOWARDS A HOSTILE MOB THAT HE HATES
AND PRETENDS TO CARE ABOUT THEM JUST TO GET INSIDE THE ANGRY MOB
HE CAME WITH INTENT TO STIR TROUBLE.
ROTTENHOUSE WILL ROT IN PRISON
@@MrDICKHEAD28 he didnt pretend to care about them, he was there to protect the businesses the same way the “Rooftop Koreans” did in the LA92 riots.
@@MrDICKHEAD28 your assumptions of emotion stated as a fact here is stated like a fact because it is based on your lack of ability to care about people you don't agree with.
How many other people carrying guns shot people that night?
@@juanzamarripa3778 protect the property, not the streets. Did you hear that chant? Kyle was walking around pointing the gun at people.
The absolute worst prosecuting attorney I've seen since the O J Simpson trial.
Probably of all time!
@@nosender2399 he acted in self defense
@LR Kay WTF was he supposed to do? Lay there and get killed by a mob of scumshit?
average citizen he not a hero but it was self defense.
Yeah, the only difference is OJ proactively murdered 2 people in a jealous rage and this kid legally defended himself against criminal attackers.
“But you decided you diceded to run because of the fire, why what was it so urgent ?”
Writtenhouse - it was a fire.
DA does not know how fires work.
😆😅🤣
Best answer ever….especially with the look
The prosecution lawyer is trying to blarney talk and tell long winded yarns to bamboozle the jury into confusion.
I think the jury hates the prosecutor at this point he just ask the same thing over and over he loves to insinuate stuff then say right.
wookies live on endor argument.
@@90secondsuntilmidnight Exactly, and Kyle takes it all on the chin ... considers his words, restates his case and the little worm of a prosecutor can't dance around any of it.
@@Nomex212 If chewbacca lives on endor you must acquit
@@90secondsuntilmidnight totally, with word salad
Thankfully there’s a bunch of video of what happened that day. If not, Kyle would have been thrown in jail for life already. These charges are stupid
Absolutely! The detectives and local politicians would have doctored everything to make Kyle look like a psycho.
The prosecution has established that he feels arson is nothing, putting out fires is a crime and hostile crowds have a right to be hostile anywhere they gather and no one has a right to be in their vicinity - and only a firearm is a deadly weapon. No wonder no one else was charged w a crime that night.
lmfao!!!
Very true. The general narrative that Kyle, and Kyle alone, should just be minding his own business while everyone else burns down his community is ludicrous. And extremely dangerous.
Exactly, this is ridiculous.... trying to make one of the only decent, community protecting people there aa criminal for putting out fires and adminsterning aide?? So BACKWARDS...... earlier he asked him “didn’t you get the curfew notice” Kyle said well there were hundreds if not thousands of ppl there who didn’t care about the curfew” prosecutor: “so if’s law isn’t being enforced it’s ok to commit a crime?” He also brought up that he would sometimes drive without a liscence like it was a HUGE crime,, meanwhile the losers attacking Kyle were child predators and career criminals, leeches on society yet they weren’t allowed to bring up their criminal history 🙄
@@cortneyrensThe unlicensed driving shows he had no respect for law. He was there to shoot obviously. The running away fooled simpletons.
This is what happens when politics make it into the judicial system.
its been there since I was born so this crap existed in the 80s or longer.
@@SharuezPJL But this case was politically motivated, more than any other.
Why does this trial live stream have so many skips? Jesus Christ, the O.J. trial was 30 years ago and we had a better picture.
No kidding it’s like they filmed it with a rock.
trial in wisconsin haha
@@JT-ls3ly Fox news has much better videos, high quality. But comments are disabled. So I think problem is elsewhere
So irritating 😠.
"It was the time he was threatening to cut people's hearts out."
"The time he said 'When I catch you alone I'm gonna kill you' I took that as a threat to me personally ."
“B-but how close was he to you?” Seethe_wojak.png
"Why were you putting out that fire though?"
“You had no right to be on that property!”
“You had no right to leave that property!”
“Yoo had no right to run back to that property!”
I think this prosecutor quite literally doesn’t hear himself
IT WASN'T HIS PROPERTY
There were 2 properties. Kyle was supposed to be at one property and decided to go to a other property since there wasn't no action at the property he was at.
@@joeyh9116 That's not true at all.
Kyle was told by the owner of the property at 59th that there were fires to go put out at a property 3 blocks down.
Kyle assumed there were other people there he could be safe with while he worked, so he went to go put fires out.
This is when the assaults took place and when Kyle was forced to use self defense.
So yes, he wasn't supposed to be there, but he didn't do it out of free will alone. He was asked by the property owner of whos property he was protecting to go and put a fire out 3 blocks down.
@@joeyh9116 liar
@@myaramiu really? Can you point me to the testimony that says the owner told Kyle to go put out fires at the other location? I don't recall seeing any fires during the time of the first shooting.
I need a timestamp for Binger talking about Call of Duty. That line of questioning was so bizarre that I'm not entirely sure that it actually happened.
Binger WANTS a mistrial.
@@8triagrammer if the mistrial is with predjudice he cannot go after Kyle again, and once this trial is over and Kyle is free all the rest of his cases disappear.
This prosecutor’ technic is to put words in the defendants mouth.
That's what a cross examination is fktard
Why is it so satisfying when this judge hollers at the prosecutor?
Because it's rare when a judge knows the law.
Because the prosecutor is a tip rat!
This ADA is political hit man trying to frame an innocent kid who didn't know that the lefts idea of self defense is you can't protect yourself till after you have been murdered.
About prosecutor asking why did you bring the gun. There is one simple answer; Better to have it and not need to use it, than to not have it and need to use it.
Does this work both ways though?
@@discon_csert yes it does
@@thedj3319 Better to have it and not need to use it, than to not have it and need to use it, works with most things; seat belt, umbrella, bottle of water, matches, gun etc, etc. Most people would understand this point of view I think.
Another good answer would be "I don't wear a seatbelt because I plan on getting into a car crash. I don't carry a gun because I'm planning on needing it"
@@thedj3319 The better example would be a spare tire. People drive around with a spare tire not thinking they’ll use this but keep it just to be on the safe side
It’s awesome that the judge forgot to put his cell phone on silent. If anyone else in the courtroom did that it would be trouble!
I thought so to at first but it opens the door to say he is biased :-/
We're human we make mistakes
@@fordnut4914 that's a stupid mistake for a judge to make lol
@@fordnut4914 shouldn't even have it on him
Having a God bless America song on his phone ring tone makes you Biased?
So according to the the prosecution a member of the public cant use a fire extinguisher to put out a fire but instead they need to stand by and watch the burn.
This is why decent people are scared into inaction. We need to be unleashed from nanny-state tyranny so that we,
the people, can act to stop violent crimes, without fear of persecution.
and get disarmed by a child molester
@@ns7353 and also apparently you can't assume somebody pointing a pistol at your head means you any harm until they actually shoot you.
Also he had no right to be on the Car Source property but also had no right to go off the property lol ok
No...they're supposed to start blowing people away. Little baby faced killer.
The Prosecution have failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, as is required.
The Prosecution know this, that is why in a last chance long shot they tried to force an admission from Rittenhouse that he "intended to kill" his attackers.
Rittenhouse was exhausted and wobbled a bit but held out.
This was a great day for Kyle whether he knows this or not. The poor kid conducted himself well today, just as he did before, during and after the incident!
They proved the defenses case.
Amen. Kid is a hero, an upstanding citizen whose example should be followed.
@@bernardreeves3382 he is no hero.
@Gary Jackson whoever said that I am a Democrat?
That’s the first thing that comes out of a Republicans mouth, and I’m not a democrat either.
Funny how the guys going against Kyle are not the sharpest tool in the shed talk about the incompetence and dis allusions
You mean the prosecution? Duh 😒
Watching Kyle on the stand and you think the lawyer is the idiot... ok
43:57
A prosecutor explaining to you that when mobs of terrorist criminals are having their way with your city, you need to stay indoors and hide and let them do it.
I like to ask people why we're the rioters, arsonists and looters out and about that night? "They should have stayed home." If they have the right to be free to roam the town, kyle has the right too...
@@90secondsuntilmidnight The government is made up of we the people, we the people allow this when we don't collectively take a stand against it.
@@JacobsTrash that’s true. But, there’s a way to stand up for your cause, not burning businesses and looting local communities. So…..stand up against those that are looting and burning. I couldn’t agree more.
Prosecution needs to be Prosecuted for idiocracy
and incompetence
I was watching this love and said to someone that I think the DA is trying to throw the case and get a mistrial, and then right after the break the defense argued the same thing. It was so obvious.
Thats not true. Both sides really are doing their jobs..
@@trufflesrheaven if you think breaking constitutional law is doing their job or bringing in subjects that have been explicitly barred by the judge is their job. The rest of us see how disgusting the practices are of the prosecution
The DA trying for a mistrial, if that happened. It would be without prejudice, so he gets a do over again. But his action still got the bug in the jury's ears, even if a mistrial wasn't declared. The defense motioning for a mistrial, their going for with prejudice. So now the case cannot be tried ever again, also defense is protecting their client. They know that the only charge the jury can find him guilty of, is transporting a fire arm across state lines by a unlicensed minor. He would still get some jail time.
@@harrythompson624 Thats not true. The jury decides on every count whether, he's guilty or not guilty. 5 charges..
@@harrythompson624 His attorneys are seeking a mistrial “with prejudice.” If granted, Rittenhouse would not be able to be tried again in the future. 🤷🏽♀️
I hope the prosecutors don't throw the case,he had Kyle on the fence before the trial ended today !
The whole point is ,kyle shouldn't have had that rifle & shouldn't have been there at the scene,Wisconsin's firearm laws prohibit anyone having possession of a weapon under the age of 21yrs old 🤔
I wonder a lot about the luck that Kyle had with this Judge, this arrogant prosecutor, a good defense team, and the available video from all angles. This would be a lot different if any of those pieces were different.
So God is real.
If corruption didn't exist Kyle wouldn't even be charged. It was EXCEEDINGLY obvious he defended himself long before he was arrested. All of the evidence was viral all over the internet.
Agreed. I think the persecution thought a witch trial would work because they didn't account on a Judge of genuinely character
That judge is being impartial...this doesn't mean that Kyle won't be going to jail for a long time though. Minimal sentence will be 20 years.
@@alainkov4616 for what exactly? Self defense is not a crime.
This prosecutor is not acting in good faith. Lawyer like him is why many innocent people are in jail. Kyle is innocent.
Why does it feel like the prosecutor is victim blaming him?
cuz libtards do what they accuse others of doing.
Rules of thee, not for me.
This prosecutor is trying to find a slip up and this 18 year old is making the prosecutor look extremely hostile and misleading.
You're entering an area where people are burning stuff down why did you feel it necessary that you might need to protect yourself? Why did you think you needed to yell friendly so the peaceful groups of people lighting stuff on fire would not think you were hostile?..
bruh...what?
😆😅🤣
Why were you entering the area with a strapped on loaded rifle? Ooh. Forgot. You're a pretend medic.
@@diegoflynn6215 yeah when you enter an area and your lighting stuff on fire you're not a peaceful protester....
You don't want to play a game of comparisons because you're the type of person that needs directions on how to properly eat Pop-Tarts or else you would eat the packaging. Because if you ate the packaging you would still blame the company instead of yourself 😂😂😂 smh
Did the prosecution really try to make the case "video or it didn't happen" regarding the threats?
Listening to the Prosecutor trying to bring in the "pinch and zoom" enhancement video and the Defense bringing up an objection to it, it seems to me that the Prosecutor realizes that he's screwing up his own Case and stalling for time. He realizes that he's screwed up his own Case and is trying desperately to find something to save it.
I still find it unbelievable that the states attorneys is literally defending the same criminals who destroyed their city and property, harassed and hurt others. Aren't they supposed to charge those same criminals for the acts they did? Why are they only pointing the finger at Kyle?
Well killer kid did shoot 3 people.
@@diegoflynn6215 you wouldn’t defend yourself if you were being chased and threatened? SMH. Destroying public property is a crime as well babe.
Well, if I should ever see this prosecutor getting the snot beat out of him, I’ll just call 911 and continue on my way.
defo don't try to help and intervene you might get shot in self defence
@Keith Rayeski even better, join in and beat him with a skateboard because that apparently doesn't count as assault according to him.
Join in and finish him. Let the others take the heat.
Yes. Imagine watching his house catch fire and just shrugging and saying “it’s only a fire. Why would I help put it out?” 🤷🏼♀️
Why would you feel it necessary to call 911? Those people beating him up are clearly doing so out of fear for their lives so by intervening you're actually committing the crime. Best to just walk on by.
I can’t look at the prosecutor and not see Littlefinger from GOT
2nd Amendment. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
And he didn't even have a musket!! Disgrace to the 2nd amendment.
YEAH JUST LET ME WALK INTO ANGRY MOB PRETEND TO BE WITH THEM GIVE SOME MEDICAL CARE JUST TO GET INSIDE THE ANGRY MOB THEN STIR TROUBLE AND CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE
The 2nd amendment is cool and all, but who asked?
@@elite3254 Yeah no one asked. Definitely not the left. They're a bunch of nitwits.
@@MrDICKHEAD28 so what trouble did he stir while putting out fires. He got pepper sprayed, assaulted 4 times, and is now on trial for defending his life.
Ive never seen such an egregious and disgusting behavior from a prosecuting attorney in my life.
I'm sure you've seen it from your parents tho
@@unmaskwithbasi8897 be careful don't cut yourself trying to be so edgy in the comments 😂😂
@@OddJames you're odd, makes sense
@@unmaskwithbasi8897 what was that supposed to be? Are you running out of steam since you probably arguing with like five people at one time? 😂😂😂 go drink some water think about it and come back ❤
@@OddJames ur whole life is running out if steam bozo, y'all are just too deranged and sick!
How many ads?? had watch this on my pc with an adblocker
You can see the sheer frustration and bewilderment on the defence teams face.
What an absolute clown this prosecutor is. His logic around calling the fire department really stayed with me. Under his own admission, much worse fires were going on the 2 days prior. Under his own admission, the fire department did not show up those 2 days prior. If the fire department isn't going out to take on these bigger fires, why should Kyle thrust the fire department to show up for the smaller ones? But Binger actually tries to argue that because the fires that the fire department didn't respond to were worse, Kyle had no reason to assume they wouldn't show up now...
The reason there were not bigger fires that night is because Kyle and his group were stopping them.
Kyle should have put it to Binger that: for example if the trash can under his Courtroom table caught fire would you Mr Binger, leave it on fire and call the Fire Department ? Or do something then and there to put it out ?
The Prosecution have failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt as is required, and they know it.
@@S-North Ugh that would have been a genius rebuttal that I would have loved to witness haha
I really like this judge unlike the George Floyd case the defense actually has a chance instead of being guilty from day one because the judge and jury was terrified of what will happen if they ruled wrong
The rittenhouse case will forever be taught in colleges and universities by professors to prosecutors what NOT to do to win a case.
Aye, prosecutorial overreach.
Had they charged him with manslaughter they may have stood a slight chance of getting a conviction on him, some jurors would go with that, even though we know it was self defence it doesn’t always go that way in a courtroom but to charge him with 2 first degree homicides and a first degree attempted homicide was optimistic to say the very least no sane jury would have found him guilty of intentional homicide.
All that coupled with the prosecution behaviour throughout makes for a great training video for future prosecutors and defence attorneys.
And how the DA charges someone before all the facts are in. Prosecution were changing their story as the case went on like it ws their first time, complete asinine job
And in hair salons too : how NOT to look in court.
Don’t have guilty people to defend🤷🏻♂️
@@gregbayne6229 huh?
what a wonderful young man! if only there were more like him
Binger is a Katastrophe in court.Good for Rittenhouse......hope he will be a free man in the end.
The prosecution seems to be deliberately misinterpreting Kyle's answers. He's asking Kyle "why he brought the rifle with him." Kyle tells him "it's for protection." The prosecution asks "protection from who." The answer is no one specifically. He brought it JUST IN CASE he was attacked he could protect himself. It's not hard to understand. The prosecution- "Why didn't you hand it to anyone like you did earlier?" Kyle says there was no one trust worthy to hand it too. If he did that and someone stole it or used it irresponsibly, he could of potentially been brought up on charges. So that's another reason he brought the rifle with him. That's like asking someone why do people need a weapon at home for self defense. Uuummmm, it's IN THE EVENT civilians need to protect themselves. It's our second amendment right. The prosecution is trying to make Kyle look bad by any means. So many examples of this throughout this video. Kyle having to use his weapon not long after, is the answer to why he brought it with him.
That is clear to majority of people what kyle meant but issue is that jury went in there with a thought that Kyle was guilty even before a trial and prosecution wouldn't use such tactics if it didn't have any effect so it's kind of scary to think of what will happen after it.
This is a known tactic. If someone ever does this to you, you know immediately that they are the enemy and not your ally
WHY DID ROTTENHOUSE WALK INTO ANGRY MOB THAT HE HATES IN THE FIRST PLACE?
@@MrDICKHEAD28 To put out fires and give first aid to people that needed it, both of which he's on video doing
@@MrDICKHEAD28 maybe I just missed it, when did Kyle say he hated those people?I know he hated what they were doing but that isn't the same as hating them
13:49 The look on the judges face makes me wonder if he is thinking "Is this guy on drugs!?!? Someone get him checked!" LOL
The reason I walk with a weapon is because it’s my right !!!
Unbelievable but true.
I'm sure it makes you feeeeel gooood toooo.
Because he gave interviews talking about high school or his family, that waives his 5th amendment rights? I don't think so.
The prosecution, on top of being slimy, dishonest and utterly incompetent, was also so dislikable that it must've played a part in Kyle being acquitted. I think he would've been acquitted nonetheless, but this certainly helped.
Not to get off topic but when is the prosecutor gonna ask about the TPS cover sheets?
This space is full of office’s
Man you are on point. The cadence of his speech is almost the same. Hmmmm. Yeah
The judges chair looks like it shouldn't recline, but it does! XD
Lol it looks like a throne 🤣
That Chair is Olympus.
The Defense lawyer (bald guy) is very smart and sharp.
Love him he's brilliant
Why is the video feed so choppy??
How about the judge!!! What a good one that tries to shoot straight down the middle and be far to both parties!!!
Free kyle, when the police fail to act its up to the people to stop their community from being destroyed by people who use any chance they can to cause havoc
Corey Chirafisi is a fantastic lawyer and he must have been a great Prosecutor when he worked for the District Attorney’s Office.
Yea he's a smart guy he talks people into a corner in a respectful and logical way
We call him Agent 47.
if i ever get i trouble i want this defense lawyer to take my case.
If I'm ever in trouble, i want this prosecutor against me.
Don't you mean this biased judge. Wow, this guy is prejudiced against the prosecutors.
@@Rob-- 🤣
Correct verdict.
This is political not a real lawful trial.
How so?
Your making it so …. I’ve listened to defense and prosecutor witness who did nothing but lie about having a pistol … your a leftist and you don’t like the facts
The trial is lawful the prosecution was political. Trying to make carrying a weapon a crime, and outlaw self defense.
These prosecutors seem to be a few watts short of a full load.
Video quality sucks whole screen keeps going gray is it just me,???? Sound cuts out too
I thought it was just me as well, but it’s the video though. So annoying.
The judge his lawyer to I see 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I can’t believe how incompetent the prosecution is. Everyone knows you can’t use someone’s invoking their fifth amendment right against them. Like you don’t have to go to law school for that it’s literally covered in high school civics
I would say competent. With questions like that, either he would get mistrial or pain Kyle in a wrong picture. He is experienced and right to remain silent is first right you are given when arrested.
I would say that was intentional.
@@dariusnoname12 why wouldn’t that risk mistrial with prejudice?
@@robertgarvey4069 He would. I was just saying that he is competent and what he did seemed like thought out tactic
This prosecutor knows everything he's doing. He said it in order to impress upon the jury the idea that kyle didn't talk til now because of that. Or he said it to get a mistrial so he can get a retrial. In either case he only gains by doing it other looking like the biggest douche ever.
Maybe the DA office thinks a mistrial would play better in the press than a jury with a not guilty verdict. People will say prejudiced judge, juries decide guilt, scream for justice for the dead. 99% won't watch any of the trial and you can see in the comments that some people just want to see Rittenhouse burn. It just seemed like the prosecutor was provoking the judge intentionally. So maybe they think they can't win the trial but can win the PR battle.
I wear my seatbelt in my car not because I'm expecting to get hit, but just in case I am hit. Based on the testimony, seems like Kyle was carrying the rifle for the same reason...just in case. Aggravating watching the prosecutor try to bait him into saying he was basically out looking for a fight.
exactly
As if a 17 year old babyface kid like Kyle would have not gotten attacked by these psychos if he has come unarmed. And what was he going to do if someone did attack the building he was asked to protect? Look at them menacingly?
Should've asked the prosecutor if he has a fire extinguisher in his house. If so, when exactly is the fire going to happen? What are you doing in your house that you'll need a fire extinguisher? When there's no imminent threat of a fire, do you get rid of the fire extinguisher?
this judge is a bad arse!! I love him....
Is the prosecutor really trying to suggest that Rittenhouse's identification of Rosembaum earlier was incorrect because he couldn't see his face? Seriously? Shows how little the prosecution had in this case that they are desperate enough to try that.
This prosecutor is really trying to trip this kid. No EMT/Paramedic goes into a unruly crowd without having the security of the cops. He didn’t have that.
These corrupt ambulance chasers playing prosecutors did not stay at a Holiday Express last night and deserve everything that Mike Nifong got, plus some more.
Were here for Kyle
The prosecutor on point
What are you watching? Can’t be this trial lol.
Your drunk...
1:22:00 Cmon Kyle, you were where Ryan USED to be! Why didn't you just use your minimap?
Because he plays Call of Duty.
Folks have guns because there is a chance they may be attacked, not because they're certain they'd be attacked.
Rofl. The prosecutor is so desperate he's trying to catch Kyle on wording.
I mean in these times no its certain you will be attacked.
THE PERSECUTION!!!
This is awesome but the cutting in and out is very annoying can you get a better feed for the content. the prosecution seems very poor to me and lots of it is very close to the line very very close.
This guy is all about playing on emotions and stuff that don't matter he is all about that woke mentality.I thank everyone in the courtroom dislikes the prosecutor.
"woke".....someone's been watching the brainwashing channel
@@carrot595 You pc brah?
Not woke but completely about manipulation. Prosecution attacked basically everything before or after the fact and basically ignored the act itself. I mean he tried to attack what shirt he wore 4 months after the act but barely spoke about the act.
So yeah, he can win if jury judges based on emotions and not facts. And he knows it.
@@dariusnoname12 >he wasn't wielding a club
>he wasn't wielding a chain
>he wasn't wielding a katana
>he wasn't wielding a lamp
>he wasn't wielding a gundam
@@colto2312 So you focused on one word "Attack", completely ignored alternative uses of it, you ignored meaning of sentence as a whole and tried to respond to it?
That is just dishonest.
"but i was acting in good faith your honor!"
*I DON'T BELIEVE YOU*
no-nonsense judge doesn't put up with nonsense
Hahah I loved this bit.
What operating system is your iPad running??? ….closes book and says exactly…..if this is what makes a good lawyer I really need to go to law school
where is the word on suppressing evidence?
Heart goes out to this young man. Self defense. On a side note: 1:21:30 Look at that gas price!
no wonder our judicial system is broken. I hope karma comes back tenfold for the prosecutor
HERE COME THE JUDGE! ! ! ! ! !
The judge has the craziest chair I've ever seen. It's like a wall come alive!!! WTF?
Gray suit should be called “Mr. Irrelevant”….Every question he asks, is irrelevant🤨. Open and shut case…. Not Guilty! Self defense.
WI…..not my kind of state
every gun owner should write this prosocuter and let him know what a disgrace of a American he is
Are you trying to destroy the forests? 😂😂 there's not enough paper for that
The Kenosha Kid, Agent 47 & Hard R VS Lunch Break, Binger, & Byecep
. To say a right winger showed up looking for a fight is just as prejudicial as saying a young man showed up and confronted rioters and looters, before being attacked by known felons.
According to the prosecutor, if people are chasing you and threatening to kill you, you shouldn’t try to defend yourself. You should wait for them to do it to see if they are serious or not.
Binger is desperate and inept.
It's not a good look.
Pinching and zooming? Really? So the pinching and zooming should change what the recorded video is doing?
This prosecutor should be disbarred. This is not a criminal case - there isn’t a single objective human (that isn’t motivated by political narratives or tribalism) who could look at the videos/photos/testimony/evidence and not see that this was clearly and 100% self defense
Are you kidding me? The judge should be discharged.. refusing to allow the prosecutors to use the zoom function on an iPad to allow them to show evidence which directly contradicts the defendants testimony.. And on top of that the judge didn't even give him time to find an expert to disprove these absurd falsehoods offered by the defense. This is a false of a trial the judge has been biased since the beginning.
The FBI drone footage showed they ambushed him, chased him, he was running away and attacked with skateboards and guns -even the state’s “star witnesses” admitted it was self defense, you’re not being honest or objective if you don’t think this was self defense. It’s sad that anyone lost their life, but unfortunately they did.
Next you’ll say that because they can’t be called victims this is biased? Clearly you don’t have a cursory understanding of the law because that’s what’s being established- whether or not they were in fact “victims”. And I’m sorry you’ve been mislead… Rittenhouse did NOT chase them he was being chased and attacked. Any objective person would see this
@@cmonayyy7238 no. They shouldn’t be called victims unless the courts have already determined them to be victims which in this case they haven’t. However the judge shouldn’t have allowed the defense to use loaded terms to describe those individuals who Kyle Rittenhouse killed such as looters and arsonists. That is for their own lawsuits to decide.
@@cmonayyy7238 in so doing the judge showed bias and favorability toward the defende
Yeah. Why would you even try to run up on a dude with a gun lol
He literally asked him basically before the indecent have you wished you had your gun while you were mad before lol
Binger is a Sadist
One hour forty min 😱added pixels is equal to photoshop!
I hope Mr. Bingdong gets removed from his position. He seems perfectly fine with breaking the rules of the court.
the lady w the camera seems to be aiming it at prosecution screen lol
Atleast remove ads from public content.