Just saying your background is creeping me out. I’m retired and I watch your show but it looks like blood splattered from behind the walls behind you. Couldn’t they pick out different colors???
HelloFresh is crap, arrives in terrible unsealed packaging, poor quality, tiny portions, is expensive and customer service is abysmal. Order today and cancel tomorrow!
They can't necessarily "order a Lawyer to write an essay" just like that, the Lawyer was held in contempt, and was given an unspoken ultimatum, write the essay or pay the fine. 😅
Years ago, I challenged a speeding ticket in court. Before I could finish my presentation, provide evidence, etc., the judge cut me off, said I was done, ordered me to pay the fine or go to jail. I paid, left the courthouse, and the next week filed a complaint with the judicial fitness commission in Oregon. Eventually, the judge was suspended without pay for a month.
I watched it live. She wasn't patient, she was weak and emotional. She allowed Darrell Brooks to run her court room. She would send him to the other court room then bring him right back in. She made a mockery of the court and victims' families. NO Male judge would have done that.
@@chiefkyle1098 I watched it live too. There is a thing called due process. She was legally required to let him try to make his case since he was representing himself. It is required of her or any other judge. A man would’ve had to do the same thing, he just would’ve lost his temper and yelled more, which would put the case in jeopardy of being a mistrial.
@@chiefkyle1098 "weak and emotional"??? let's see how you'd handle a court case in which you're forced by law to give the man that represents himself a chance to make his case, knowing that he has 76 criminal counts of attempted murder 6 of which are actual murder and he's having a f**king evil af staredown at you, all while you're forced to let him speak because he represents himself. would you break the code and risk losing your position as judge? if yes then you're too "weak and emotional" to be a judge. That's not what "being a man" is, that's "being a fool" is.
@@chiefkyle1098she gave him way too many chances I get what you’re saying. Yes, she tried to be open and let him shovel the dirt on himself but time after time it was “I’m warning you, this is the last time, THIS is the last time…If you say one more thing..” over and over. The second time should’ve been it. He cursed her he threatened her he’d glare and slam things. It was too much. It was impossible to watch. She’d start every day with warnings that he’d disobey the moment he spoke. Any reasonable judge would’ve warned once maybe twice then booted him. He was clearly unstable trying to threaten and scare the woman.
That first judge literally proved that attorneys point. If it were about her children she wouldn’t tolerate it. And she didn’t and kicked him out. The irony is palpable
@@Florin_NeaguExactly! All he said was - what if it was spoken about your children. How is that threatening? She misused her power. Such entitled judges.
Now, I might be missing some context, but the Manhattan judge insisting that an expert witness cannot be called because he has never testified as an expert witness before this judge before: How does one get to testify as an expert witness the first time if you only allow experts that had been called to your court before?
The judge was questioning the defense attorney’s statement that the witness had testified before this judge as an expert witness and the judge called him on that bullshite. The attorney was trying to be slick and got caught. Misrepresent the truth and pay the price.
Actually a really good point lol. She completely misunderstood what he said. However that defense team was horrible in their conduct throughout trial. So im sure it was building up in her.
@@Snap-Time That’s not what happened nor what was even said in this video. Judges are not “forced to resign” except by the Florida Bar, which as mentioned, a censure/reprimand didn’t get the chance to occur because she resigned prior to that happening.
Judge Darrow showed a GREAT deal of restraint during Darrell Brooks tantrums, i applaud her! She endured all of that disruption, time wasting and insults so that he had less chance on any appeal. To be as disrespected as she, prosecution, witnesses and family members of victims was just showed his lack of value for human life and common decency!!!
Florida Supreme Court fired for Her, clearly didn’t handle it well, she actually acted very badly, and is gone due to her actions eat your own words😮😮😮
@@shovelmastaflashEven if she was baron bringing up the judges kids in front of a defendent who likely will hold resentment towards her potentially putting them in danger. It was completely uncalled for.
@@melvincanada264 That's the argument the defense attorney was making about his own children then the judge spazzed out when he made the analogy to her. She's just a hypocrite.
@@anthonydiaz5349Fair enough, but the attorney was attempting to explain his perspective and instead of trying to come to an understanding, the judge immediately misunderstood and got angry. It's just makes her look immature. Borderline hysterical.
Judge in the case of the guy who ran over multiple people and killed 6 of them: "I will sentence you to 6 life sentences. But I am sentencing you to, like, 700+ years in prison, just to be sure..."
No, it's worse. The pilot and the passenger share the same fate. I think it's more like a movie where the pilot has a heart attack and a passenger with no training tries to land the plane with instructions from the ground. Yeah, it's like getting into an argument with ground control.
some of these cases are huge examples of just how lacking our justice system has grown. political or other ideological biases have no place in the court room.
Yeah it amazing people don’t see the bias the judge held in the rittenhouse trial, it was absolutely disgusting to watch. But people don’t care because their own personal bias is the only reason they cared so much about rittenhouse being made a pariah In the first place.
@@Matthew-Anthony He was innocent but I think a trial was probably justified to work out if he really did fear for his life and to work out why he really went to the area that day. I think because he said he went to protect businesses armed it could be concluded that he intended to shoot someone that day regardless of the circumstances and that he was opposed to the protesters ideologically so it could be construed that he wanted to kill them for that reason. Then there was the fact he was underaged to carry that gun and came from out of state. They probably should have put him on trial for different charges. The government really does not like vigilantes as they aren't trained and stuff like this happens.
If your attorney is reputable then I'd be happy, because it would possibly lead to a mistrial or some failure to follow procedure which my attorney could use to get the case thrown out.
I absolutely loved the alternative contempt sentences for people in that one courtroom. I think that 17 page essay on professionalism wil have a deeper impact.
Those sanctions literally had me laughing out loud to a point where my partner asked what was so funny (I'm listening on earbuds). I'm a pretty good writer and although I have a degree in a scientific field, I often counted on any writing assignment as an easy A and a way to boost my grade points. So as soon as he said the topic of the paper, but for a crazy 17 pages, I immediately thought to discuss it for that long I would include all professions that interact in the courtroom. So I think the essay would get me in trouble as I would most certainly have to include the professionalism of judges, as well, and the judge may take that as a swipe at them. But seriously......10 major and 10 minor sources to site? HAHAHAHA I'd have offered to double the fine!!!
Yea that was an epic move. Educate them and give them some real pain instead of some simple monetary penalty that they would most likely not even notice.
Where did he threaten her children? He said someone said something about his kids. She said she didn’t remember that. He said well if it was your children you’d remember that.
He didn't threaten them he should've never brought them up. Completely inappropriate and as she said the people in rows as well as the defendent wouldn't know she was a mother but by telling them that you potentially put them in danger.
the female judge is out of line against that guy...shes way above her league and should be removed as a judge...telling people they cant smile or laugh? what is this soviet union?
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb The defense side was rude throughout the entire thing, primarily sticking to flipping the bird at the prosecuting side and the victims but also made remarks that would have made a grown man beat them to within an inch of their lives due to how bad some of them were. That case was of a child killer and the moment the defense lawyer brought up that line about if she had/has children she decided enough was enough and brought the hammer down on the lawyer, he had ZERO right to even insinuate that in a court setting.
18:14 This is my favorite one. Judge forces someone to buy lunch and another to write an essay on the importance of professionalism! OMG i love this judge.
The judge was beyond ridiculous in the first one. Right or not, the attorney simply said she would have noticed if someone spoke about HER kids. Not once did he threaten her kids or speak negatively about her kids. What ethical violations did he commit?? Get over yourself lady
The Brooks Trial is proof that judges, despite the defendant's behavior, go mostly above and beyond to ensure that the defendant receives a completely fair trial and that at a cases conclusion, there is close to NILL grounds for an appeal.
She was a COWARD and has zero business being a judge, ESPECIALLY in criminal law. She was a spineless coward, just like darrell was to those parade goers
OK that first judge was grand standing and I remember a bunch of witnesses saying "if they were your children." So the guy is not wrong. The judge was totally out of line
@@kelsoriche3637 That's why she's not a judge anymore - she was heavily criticized for the way she handled the trial and was forced to resign as a judge shortly after. So at least she got her karma.
In the first situation, he was upset someone brought his kids into it. The judge dismissed his feelings but when her kids were brought into it, she freaked out. Maybe there was more to it but it seemed more to prove his point.
"On June 2, 2023, the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission found that Scherer violated many rules governing judicial conduct during Cruz's trial. Scherer "unduly chastised" public defender Melisa McNeill and her team, wrongly accused one Cruz attorney of threatening her child, and improperly embraced members of the prosecution team after the trial's conclusion. The Commission recommended a public reprimand for Scherer.[12] The public reprimand was issued the next month."
I thought Florida is the State that Sheriff Grady Judd says is tough on crime? The judicial system reprimanded the judge in a mass murder case with a bunch of school kids? Unbelievable!
She resigned from the bench, but I sure hope any future prospective employers take her behavior and that official reprimand into consideration before hiring her.
@@joeytyler5072 Or maybe she is tired of the Bull $hit. Attorney did not prove anything was said about his kids, dude didnt even ask the stenographer to read back what was said. It was all contrived BS to take the focus off the trial. The dude is upset about his kids even being mentioned, when he is defending a person who gunned down other peoples kids.
That one judge asking the attorney how his "paper" was coming along after getting onto the other one for not buying lunch just brought back memories of my high-school English teacher lol
@@jasonguevara9510 do you even understand what you’re even saying? What we need is less people like you to continue giving those types of opinions full of sexism
The prosecutor who questioned Kyle Rittenhouse on his silence after being arrested, was amazing to see. Almost everyone knows that while being arrested, "YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT".
@@mestupkid211986When and where did Kyle Rittenhouse commit murder? He definitely did not do it during the Democrats "peaceful protests" which caused $1-2 billion nationwide.
By the Judge's actions of ordering the lawyer to proceed to the rear of the room she simultaneously proved his point that if they were talking about her kids she'd perceive it as inappropriate as he mentions 🤣
All he said was that if they were talking about her kids she'd remember and she freeeeeeaked out. She was not disrespected and proved that she only cares about things when it concerns her, LIKE HE SAID. He was 100% correct. What a disgusting excuse for a human.
The judge in Brooks' case was unbelievably patient. What was Brooks thinking acting like that? That he would be so intimidating or so loud that everyone would just say "oh, man, just get out of here a free man, just so we don't have to deal with such a "tough" grown-up" or what was his logic??
Ordering them to buy lunch and write essays is absolutely amazing. I have no context to what led to that, but it makes me think they were acting like children so the judge punished them as such.
@@ChrisTessmer its not alarming. It happens. This person is being silly saying its alarming. The alternative was the judge would sentence them to jail time and/or fines for being in contempt of court. The judge was going easy on them.
I would imagine those lawyers' time would be better spent in preparing for the cases being held in court, rather than writing a 17 page essay. I'd refuse if I was told to do that.
The defense was acting horribly the entire trial, including joking around, laughing, and flipping off the court, all caught on video. Let's not forget that he killed multiple children. She had enough of their disrespect to the court and the victims.
ew no lmfao. they were acting terrible the entire time and bringing up someone’s children in a mass homicide shooting case, is DISGUSTING. he deserved it.
The judge ladies just yapping he has a point she’s keeps explaining every action what’s going on also saying he’s having a stare down he pounded his fist. It makes me scared is just 😒😒🙄🙄
#1 - Judge was way out of line. The attorney didn't say anything remotely like a threat toward her children. His words started out to be something to the effect of, "If it was your children that someone brought up like the other side did, you would be upset." Then, somewhat ironically, she went nuts even though her children were NOT spoken of in any negative way, let alone was no threat directed at her children. That reeked of a judge putting on show because she knew it was on TV.
I’m honestly upset the first judge got backlash, I know with court is definitely more complicated even if we don’t like the attorneys defending monsters like this dude taking the lives of his classmates and peers for attention. I definitely feel she lost her cool with them. But his defense team had often reflected so much disrespect towards the victims, I’m glad she at least put them in their place for how they were conducting themselves because we all know the victims or their families can’t do it themselves.
3:50 that lawyer did not threaten the judges children. All he said was that she would also be offended if people were making comments about her children like they were about his. You would think a judge would be less emotional
@@bobmaddox5860”I didn’t hear anyone attacking your children” “If it was about your children you’d have heard it” “THIS MAN IS THREATENING MY CHILDREN” …I mean wtf is that
4:41 I was shocked and rly upset how they all were talking about their children when ppl in the court LOST their children from this monster who killed them in a vile evil way 🤦🏻♀️ 😡
Every time Brooks comes up in one of these videos, I just have to skip. If I go the rest of my life without hearing his voice ever again, I’ll die a happy man.
The Florida Supreme Court publicly reprimanded the first judge (Elizabeth Scherer) who oversaw the penalty trial of Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz for showing bias toward the prosecution. The unanimous decision followed a recommendation from the Judicial Qualifications Commission. The 15-member commission found that Scherer “unduly chastised” lead public defender Melisa McNeill and her team, wrongly accused one Cruz attorney of threatening her child, and improperly embraced members of the prosecution in the courtroom after the trial’s conclusion. The judge resigned effective June 2023.
I saw one online where the judge got so mad at the public defender, he came off the bench and challenged him to a fist fight in the back room. And they did it. The judge resigned before being removed from the bench and he was also disbarred.
It was absolutely ridiculous. The judge was literally violating the defendants rights and all the defense attorney did was stand up for their client. And not to mention the whole courtroom fricken applauded for the judge when he assaulted him 🙄🙄🙄🙄
The brooks trial must have been incredible frustrating for everyone else involved other than the defendant. I know we all understand why but how people didn’t crack the shits is beyond me.
The mfer watched a couple of Law & Order episodes, remembered a couple of big words and thought he could go toe to toe with the law. Judge put him in his place quick lol.
I agree! I watched the entire trial and so many times I wanted to just grab Brooks and shake him. He was so disrespectful it was absolutely infuriating. I can't imagine if my parents or children had been hurt by him then having to listen to his stupidity. Also, equally infuriating was the fact that he was out on bond for a very similar crime just weeks earlier.
I tried yelling to my teacher that she was out of order when she told me to stop whispering back and forth with my friend. THANKFULLY she went into momentary shock then started cracking up. I was in first grade. My next 3 years there she'd smile and nod and say "Your Honor" every time I walked by her class. 😂😂😂
How funny that she thinks he's silly for a side comment about his children, but as soon as he LITERALLY does the same thing to her like he was done..... HOW DARE HE!!!!! Oh the hypocrisy 🙄🙄
Ok, say what you want about that POS’s defense team, the bizarre way they acted, and the the disrespectful attitude they held towards the prosecution and even some of the families of the victims at times, but when he simply said “Judge, i think if they had brought YOUR children into this, you might have remembered..” For the judge to then FREAK out, and act like he just “threatened” her children, is INCREDIBLE. She wouldnt even TOLERATE the very mentioning of the phrase “your children” in reference to herself, but when its aimed at the defense attorney, she doesnt say JACK S, doesn’t care, it didn’t matter AT ALL to her. That whole interaction makes her look VERY biased if you’re able to watch it with an unbiased eye yourself. In NO WAY did he “threaten her children” as she tried to imply while she was shaming him. Thats one of the MOST hypocritical moments I’ve ever seen from a judge…
I just can't get over this first judge. Dude says he doesn't appreciate the comments about his children. Judge doesn't care. He says she'd care if they were talking about her children. Her response: "How dare you bring up my children!"
She said she didn’t remember ever mentioning his children. Our system is screwed up because it’s all about being nice to the criminals. And then people complain when criminals are let out of jail or charges dismissed.
the public reprimand was based on the judge's hugging family members after the trial was over, while in her robe. i'm not sure that the exchanges seen in the video were, per se, violations of judicial ethics.
Feelings have no place in a court room!! I hate when judges act on feelings. I'm sorry if you don't agree and as much as you hate it... judges should act on laws not on but feelings or ego
yup and the B*tch got exactly wut she deserved Thats why its not gud to allow females to be judges Soon as its their time of the month they can't control their emotions
14:30 Brooks is not only an EVIL person he's also not very clever, I guess the old adage about being your own lawyer was definitely true in this case ! Lots of...interesting...happenings in this video
Brooks is really the worst case of Dunning-Kruger ever. That's what happens if someone considers himself much smarter than he actually is. So glad that they still managed to get the trial through and sentence him.
E. Scherer was appalling throughout the entire trial in Florida. That she resigned before a decision about her diabolical behaviour was taken, proves, at least to me, that she knew she was completely partial during the whole trial.
@@abrilstorm A judge still has to be as impartial and neutral as possible throughout the whole trial, that's her job and she failed at it. There's a reason she was forced to resign as a judge shortly afterward.
Her bias was visible from space, she’s lucky the jury saved her from a sentence that the office would appeal. She would have gone down as a historical robed goof if they’d had a full trial she botched this badly.
I think the first judge was too emotional. Not suited at all for that position I think you have to be cool headed and act professional at all times. You have to site the law and not your angry feelings. It’s great that she quit for all ! Just the fact that she quit , tells you how unstable and emotional she is. She needs to see a therapist in all respect. Reach out for medical attention, take anger management and stay away from arguments during your period.
I cannot believe that the state of Wisconsin let such an incompetent prosecuting attorney try one of the most high profile cases of the decade. I agree that rittenhouse was not guilty, but they put the prosecutors office to shame.
@@jasonmyneni8605 I don’t know all the facts, but a 17 year old owning an assault rifle and happen to have to use it killing someone for defense? If he knew that itd be so dangerous then don’t go there. And then making money out of it after the trial? Disgusting. Did I kill someone, be it in defense or not, I’d never make money out of it.
Judge Elizabeth Scherer from Parkland shooter trial speaks publicly for first time since resigning after controversial case. January 8th 2024. CBS MIAMI This is what she had to say to CBS MIAMI: "To try to threaten my children and bring up my children is inappropriate," Scherer said. "So I'm very protective of my daughter and looking back, I, I may have overreacted. In other words, maybe that's not what the attorney meant, but I don't feel it's ever, ever appropriate to look at a judge and say, 'Well, if this was your kid.' I mean that is just so far out of line that I will tell you he found the right button to push." Scherer admits to overreacting during that one exchange. "I try to maintain a level of, you know, calmness and take a deep breath when somebody's trying to sort of bait me (by) bringing up my daughter," she said. "You know I did lose my temper, and just to put it in context, although I don't know that that's what was meant by it." But with time has come perspective. "But long story short, do I think that's what he meant?" she said. "Probably not. Do I think that he was inappropriate? Absolutely!
The first judge completely misunderstood what the guy was saying and should not have taken his words personally, but i recall that defense team was unprofessional as well.
14:53 “THE DEFENDANT!!!” Makes me crack up every time. He is so exhausting, even just highlight clips make me angry. I mean- what an insufferable piece of work.
3:40 counsel never threatened the judge's children. never even came close to it. he asked how she'd feel in his shoes if someone were to bring up her kids out of the blue at trial and she not only took exception but somehow read "threat" from it? unhinged.
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
Go to www.hellofresh.com/50sidebar and use code 50sidebar for 50% off plus 15% off the next 2 months!
They're all as bent as each other, there is no such thing as justice in the United Nazi States of America.
Great Show
Just saying your background is creeping me out. I’m retired and I watch your show but it looks like blood splattered from behind the walls behind you. Couldn’t they pick out different colors???
Double dipping in ad revenue, are we?
HelloFresh is crap, arrives in terrible unsealed packaging, poor quality, tiny portions, is expensive and customer service is abysmal. Order today and cancel tomorrow!
I had no idea a judge could order an attorney to write an essay! That's wild, I love it haha
They can't necessarily "order a Lawyer to write an essay" just like that, the Lawyer was held in contempt, and was given an unspoken ultimatum, write the essay or pay the fine. 😅
Perhaps they should let judges order writing lines for lawyers 🙊 may keep them in line…
@@alltheworldsastage4785 actually it was "write an essay or spend 20 days in jail"
Thos judge loves to abuse his powers, as we've since seen.
@@crazyrobots6565 There are a lot of high school kids who would happily do the time
@@crazyrobots6565major abuse of power!!!
Years ago, I challenged a speeding ticket in court. Before I could finish my presentation, provide evidence, etc., the judge cut me off, said I was done, ordered me to pay the fine or go to jail. I paid, left the courthouse, and the next week filed a complaint with the judicial fitness commission in Oregon. Eventually, the judge was suspended without pay for a month.
same in the England, dirtier sovreign citizens who share the same brain, in making human misery into money.
r/thathappened
Did you get your money back?
That's awesome!
@@bennoreuter4393 You never get money or time back
I have NEVER seen so much patience in a person as I did with the judge in the parade killing. She had an insane amount of professionalism.
I watched it live. She wasn't patient, she was weak and emotional. She allowed Darrell Brooks to run her court room. She would send him to the other court room then bring him right back in. She made a mockery of the court and victims' families. NO Male judge would have done that.
@@chiefkyle1098 I watched it live too. There is a thing called due process. She was legally required to let him try to make his case since he was representing himself. It is required of her or any other judge. A man would’ve had to do the same thing, he just would’ve lost his temper and yelled more, which would put the case in jeopardy of being a mistrial.
@@chiefkyle1098 "weak and emotional"??? let's see how you'd handle a court case in which you're forced by law to give the man that represents himself a chance to make his case, knowing that he has 76 criminal counts of attempted murder 6 of which are actual murder and he's having a f**king evil af staredown at you, all while you're forced to let him speak because he represents himself. would you break the code and risk losing your position as judge? if yes then you're too "weak and emotional" to be a judge. That's not what "being a man" is, that's "being a fool" is.
@@chiefkyle1098she gave him way too many chances I get what you’re saying. Yes, she tried to be open and let him shovel the dirt on himself but time after time it was “I’m warning you, this is the last time, THIS is the last time…If you say one more thing..” over and over. The second time should’ve been it. He cursed her he threatened her he’d glare and slam things. It was too much. It was impossible to watch. She’d start every day with warnings that he’d disobey the moment he spoke. Any reasonable judge would’ve warned once maybe twice then booted him. He was clearly unstable trying to threaten and scare the woman.
@@Helliox well said
That's why SHE earned HER position as a JUDGE
That first judge literally proved that attorneys point. If it were about her children she wouldn’t tolerate it. And she didn’t and kicked him out. The irony is palpable
She excused him because he was speaking out of line/breaking procedure. Not because the attorney insulted her kids and she was angry
@@screamtheteam12345 Nah, it was clearly because she got butthurt.
@@screamtheteam12345Yeah dude grow a brain. She was being ridiculous.
@@Florin_NeaguExactly! All he said was - what if it was spoken about your children. How is that threatening? She misused her power. Such entitled judges.
@@screamtheteam12345 Please, don’t ever be selected to be a juror. It’s obvious you don’t pay attention.
Now, I might be missing some context, but the Manhattan judge insisting that an expert witness cannot be called because he has never testified as an expert witness before this judge before: How does one get to testify as an expert witness the first time if you only allow experts that had been called to your court before?
The judge was questioning the defense attorney’s statement that the witness had testified before this judge as an expert witness and the judge called him on that bullshite. The attorney was trying to be slick and got caught. Misrepresent the truth and pay the price.
That first judge getting so mad at the "children" comment, proves the point the lawyer was making. EXACTLY THE POINT!!!
Actually a really good point lol. She completely misunderstood what he said. However that defense team was horrible in their conduct throughout trial. So im sure it was building up in her.
@@YoBrand15you're correct. The defense team was incredibly disrespectful to the judge as well as the family of the victim.
Yep and she was forced to resign after this because she’s clearly not fit to be judge.
@@MidgetPunterthat’s probably true but still gives no right to the judge to claim a threat was made against her children as that clearly didn’t happen
@@Snap-Time That’s not what happened nor what was even said in this video. Judges are not “forced to resign” except by the Florida Bar, which as mentioned, a censure/reprimand didn’t get the chance to occur because she resigned prior to that happening.
Judge Darrow showed a GREAT deal of restraint during Darrell Brooks tantrums, i applaud her! She endured all of that disruption, time wasting and insults so that he had less chance on any appeal. To be as disrespected as she, prosecution, witnesses and family members of victims was just showed his lack of value for human life and common decency!!!
She just didn’t want the activists coming after her
@@rikityrikoh shut up he was extremely out of line and he got the sentences he deserved
@@romansbottom I absolutely agree, he was out of line. She should of dropped the hammer on him at least more than she did. Why didn’t she?
I totally agree with you on that
Florida Supreme Court fired for Her, clearly didn’t handle it well, she actually acted very badly, and is gone due to her actions eat your own words😮😮😮
That first judge treated the attorney like this was kindergarten and she was a teacher lol
She wigged out over that children comment. Methinks she doesn't/can't have children.
@@shovelmastaflashEven if she was baron bringing up the judges kids in front of a defendent who likely will hold resentment towards her potentially putting them in danger. It was completely uncalled for.
@@melvincanada264 That's the argument the defense attorney was making about his own children then the judge spazzed out when he made the analogy to her. She's just a hypocrite.
@@shovelmastaflash because the comments made to the defense attorney weren't directly about his kids, the comments made to the judge were
@@anthonydiaz5349Fair enough, but the attorney was attempting to explain his perspective and instead of trying to come to an understanding, the judge immediately misunderstood and got angry.
It's just makes her look immature. Borderline hysterical.
Judge in the case of the guy who ran over multiple people and killed 6 of them: "I will sentence you to 6 life sentences. But I am sentencing you to, like, 700+ years in prison, just to be sure..."
Making that dude write a 17 page paper with TEN references is amazing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not 10 but 20. He said 10 primary AND 10 secondary.
Look at the judge now
@@mikedirado4270 the comment I was looking for! That judge I going to be valeting cars after the trial!!
@@Take2Crewwhy what happened?
That judge is a clown and he got reprimanded for being a clown multiple times during that case
Getting into a fight with a judge is like a passenger yelling at the pilot.
Backseat lawyering😂😂😂
Wrong....Judges are elected.
More like his temper tantrum is gonna give him some serious time out. He should have just plead guilty once he thought he could throw lip like that.
Or a cop arresting the passenger for the driver speeding
No, it's worse. The pilot and the passenger share the same fate. I think it's more like a movie where the pilot has a heart attack and a passenger with no training tries to land the plane with instructions from the ground. Yeah, it's like getting into an argument with ground control.
some of these cases are huge examples of just how lacking our justice system has grown. political or other ideological biases have no place in the court room.
Political judges and prosecutors are nothing new. Their campaigns have been funded by political caucuses forever.
Yeah it amazing people don’t see the bias the judge held in the rittenhouse trial, it was absolutely disgusting to watch. But people don’t care because their own personal bias is the only reason they cared so much about rittenhouse being made a pariah In the first place.
@dizzleslaunsen2372 Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent. It, clearly, shows it on video and should not have gone to court at all.
@@Matthew-Anthony He was innocent but I think a trial was probably justified to work out if he really did fear for his life and to work out why he really went to the area that day. I think because he said he went to protect businesses armed it could be concluded that he intended to shoot someone that day regardless of the circumstances and that he was opposed to the protesters ideologically so it could be construed that he wanted to kill them for that reason. Then there was the fact he was underaged to carry that gun and came from out of state. They probably should have put him on trial for different charges.
The government really does not like vigilantes as they aren't trained and stuff like this happens.
@@dizzleslaunsen2372 The judge conducted the Court properly. Give examples of some kind of misconduct. Your own bias is showing.
How screwed must you feel when your attorney and the judge get in a shouting match?
I'd say pretty screwed.
If your attorney is reputable then I'd be happy, because it would possibly lead to a mistrial or some failure to follow procedure which my attorney could use to get the case thrown out.
Wow. As an attorney of 20 years myself, some of those as a prosecutor, seeing these attorneys get yelled at is just😬
Judge over reacted on the kid mention. I mean dude did not threaten her kids. Weirdo.
Frankly, it is hilarious to see her react strongly to something she was telling the defence not to react strongly to 😂
I absolutely loved the alternative contempt sentences for people in that one courtroom. I think that 17 page essay on professionalism wil have a deeper impact.
Absolutely agreed! How badly he wanted to just pay a $1000 fine.
Those sanctions literally had me laughing out loud to a point where my partner asked what was so funny (I'm listening on earbuds). I'm a pretty good writer and although I have a degree in a scientific field, I often counted on any writing assignment as an easy A and a way to boost my grade points. So as soon as he said the topic of the paper, but for a crazy 17 pages, I immediately thought to discuss it for that long I would include all professions that interact in the courtroom. So I think the essay would get me in trouble as I would most certainly have to include the professionalism of judges, as well, and the judge may take that as a swipe at them. But seriously......10 major and 10 minor sources to site? HAHAHAHA I'd have offered to double the fine!!!
Yea that was an epic move. Educate them and give them some real pain instead of some simple monetary penalty that they would most likely not even notice.
I wonder if he wrote it or had an intern at the law firm write it for him?
I would use ChatGPT to assist me in writing that paper if I was that lawyer. 🤣 It's likely that it was not out when this happened.
"Don't get brazen with me" is my all-time favorite judge quote of all time!
That judge made sure a murderer went free.
@@Raccoon_Mama. Self defense isn't murder, but ok lol
@@Raccoon_Mama. u are pathetic
@@Raccoon_Mama. lmao what
@Raccoon_Mama. Do you remember when one of the guys he shot almost literally said "I pointed my gun at him first"?
Where did he threaten her children? He said someone said something about his kids. She said she didn’t remember that. He said well if it was your children you’d remember that.
He didn't threaten them he should've never brought them up. Completely inappropriate and as she said the people in rows as well as the defendent wouldn't know she was a mother but by telling them that you potentially put them in danger.
I was wondering the same thing. I did't think the Judge acted that bad.
the female judge is out of line against that guy...shes way above her league and should be removed as a judge...telling people they cant smile or laugh? what is this soviet union?
He had no business bringing up her children or personal life or trying to imply that she doesn't care about anything else other than her own.
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb The defense side was rude throughout the entire thing, primarily sticking to flipping the bird at the prosecuting side and the victims but also made remarks that would have made a grown man beat them to within an inch of their lives due to how bad some of them were. That case was of a child killer and the moment the defense lawyer brought up that line about if she had/has children she decided enough was enough and brought the hammer down on the lawyer, he had ZERO right to even insinuate that in a court setting.
18:14 This is my favorite one. Judge forces someone to buy lunch and another to write an essay on the importance of professionalism! OMG i love this judge.
he got exposed
The judge was beyond ridiculous in the first one. Right or not, the attorney simply said she would have noticed if someone spoke about HER kids. Not once did he threaten her kids or speak negatively about her kids. What ethical violations did he commit?? Get over yourself lady
Yeah what a hypocrite. She completely dismissed the lawyers concern and then made up outrage when he said nothing of the short.
If she didn’t speak about his damn children, then there’s nothing for y’all to whine about.
The Brooks Trial is proof that judges, despite the defendant's behavior, go mostly above and beyond to ensure that the defendant receives a completely fair trial and that at a cases conclusion, there is close to NILL grounds for an appeal.
lol she didn’t want to give him any chance for an appeal 😂
Perfect!!
She was a COWARD and has zero business being a judge, ESPECIALLY in criminal law. She was a spineless coward, just like darrell was to those parade goers
OK that first judge was grand standing and I remember a bunch of witnesses saying "if they were your children." So the guy is not wrong. The judge was totally out of line
That’s what I thought too. She’s only validating the defense attorney’s concern.
@rikityrik I was thinking the same thing...she was proving his point.
Too emotional.
She is not fit to be a judge if that’s her temperament I feel bad for anyone who was unjustly sentenced due to her emotion.
@@kelsoriche3637 That's why she's not a judge anymore - she was heavily criticized for the way she handled the trial and was forced to resign as a judge shortly after. So at least she got her karma.
Great segment :) I liked the pacing, selection of cases, and the amount of commentary was just right.
You said it perfectly!
Totally agree
Assigning an essay is DIABOLICAL 😂😂 17 pages with 20 sources too??!!
The judge giving essays is my hero!! The APA format and primary and secondary sources are brilliant.
@@PrettyPolyInPink ur hero got removed from the case
In the first situation, he was upset someone brought his kids into it. The judge dismissed his feelings but when her kids were brought into it, she freaked out. Maybe there was more to it but it seemed more to prove his point.
"On June 2, 2023, the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission found that Scherer violated many rules governing judicial conduct during Cruz's trial. Scherer "unduly chastised" public defender Melisa McNeill and her team, wrongly accused one Cruz attorney of threatening her child, and improperly embraced members of the prosecution team after the trial's conclusion. The Commission recommended a public reprimand for Scherer.[12] The public reprimand was issued the next month."
I thought Florida is the State that Sheriff Grady Judd says is tough on crime?
The judicial system reprimanded the judge in a mass murder case with a bunch of school kids? Unbelievable!
Thank you. I wondered
She resigned from the bench, but I sure hope any future prospective employers take her behavior and that official reprimand into consideration before hiring her.
@@crocodile1313*retired from the bench.
@@r.c.l2569 No, the news report and others all state "resignation"
She literally proved his point 😭😭
Buddy saying the judge was not out of line but then why is the judge gone why did she resign after this LOL because she knew she was out of line
@@joeytyler5072 Or maybe she is tired of the Bull $hit. Attorney did not prove anything was said about his kids, dude didnt even ask the stenographer to read back what was said. It was all contrived BS to take the focus off the trial. The dude is upset about his kids even being mentioned, when he is defending a person who gunned down other peoples kids.
@@dustinbarlow1623 Nope. She realized she is a Karen and not suitable to be a judge.
@@kael7953 LOL I Love pure butt hurt in the morning.
"Subject matter jurisdiction" really takes me back...
oBjEkShUn!!!
😅😂
That one judge asking the attorney how his "paper" was coming along after getting onto the other one for not buying lunch just brought back memories of my high-school English teacher lol
Got some serious Vinny Gambini vibes when that judge asked how the essay was coming along…”You were serious about that?”
Wow...Judge Dorow is the most patient judge I have ever seen.
@@questionmark1152 she definitely knew she needed to act that way to reduce the possibility of a mistrial or grounds for appeal.
Man, some of these Judges seem super petty and like they are power tripping, hard. Thats exactly what we DON"T need in our justice system.
They're probably all die-hard fans of Judge Judy and are trying to become like her...
@@JustChill_1031That's actually funny. 😂
Unpopular opinion women shouldn’t be in charge of a job that has that type of stress level.
@@jasonguevara9510 do you even understand what you’re even saying? What we need is less people like you to continue giving those types of opinions full of sexism
Parkland judge easily ranks #1 as hottest judge.
how so
He wasn’t a lawyer per say but he was a lawyer pro se 😂😂😂😂😂
The prosecutor who questioned Kyle Rittenhouse on his silence after being arrested, was amazing to see. Almost everyone knows that while being arrested, "YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT".
They wanted so bad to make Kyle out to be a right wing extremist that shot peaceful protestors and just couldn't cut it
Kyle is still a murderer.
@mestupkid211986 a sworn Judge, a competent jury and more than half the country say you are wrong.
@@mestupkid211986When and where did Kyle Rittenhouse commit murder? He definitely did not do it during the Democrats "peaceful protests" which caused $1-2 billion nationwide.
Many do not have the ability, though
By the Judge's actions of ordering the lawyer to proceed to the rear of the room she simultaneously proved his point that if they were talking about her kids she'd perceive it as inappropriate as he mentions 🤣
Right smh
still, would
All he said was that if they were talking about her kids she'd remember and she freeeeeeaked out. She was not disrespected and proved that she only cares about things when it concerns her, LIKE HE SAID. He was 100% correct. What a disgusting excuse for a human.
@@knifeyonline well she was forced to resign so at least she got what she deserved.
It makes you wonder if all her children were adopted or from a previous marriage and she wasn't in fact unable to have kids
That Cruz kid makes my blood boil. Thoughts for the Victims and their families from Ireland ☘️
The judge in Brooks' case was unbelievably patient.
What was Brooks thinking acting like that? That he would be so intimidating or so loud that everyone would just say "oh, man, just get out of here a free man, just so we don't have to deal with such a "tough" grown-up" or what was his logic??
First Judge: First off, he didn’t threaten her children. Secondly, she proved his point
“ThE dEfEnDaNt” I’m laughed so hard
he was right. he crazy but right
He was right 😢
She absolutely tricked him out of his position 😂😂😂
I got one ear and I'm the only one that heard that?
Sadly he actually was right lol
Bro if the judge ordered me to do a essay rather then jail, I will write that essay. We lock up enough of our populace 😂
Ordering them to buy lunch and write essays is absolutely amazing. I have no context to what led to that, but it makes me think they were acting like children so the judge punished them as such.
That's not amazing, but alarming.
@@lousimms4766 Why is that alarming?
@@ChrisTessmer its not alarming. It happens. This person is being silly saying its alarming. The alternative was the judge would sentence them to jail time and/or fines for being in contempt of court. The judge was going easy on them.
I would imagine those lawyers' time would be better spent in preparing for the cases being held in court, rather than writing a 17 page essay. I'd refuse if I was told to do that.
Write the paper or jail. You're a lawyer, 17 pages should not take you 20 days.
The fact that theres a judge who holds people accountable by making them guy their team lunch and write papers is hilarious😂
It makes the court look ridiculous IMO.
That first judge was totally insane. What a complete narcissist. No one threatened her children, yet that is what she got out of what was being said.
but isn't that women in general... They hear what they want to hear
The defense was acting horribly the entire trial, including joking around, laughing, and flipping off the court, all caught on video. Let's not forget that he killed multiple children. She had enough of their disrespect to the court and the victims.
@@Noah-tn7pq Found the stereotypical, misogynistic incel… “All women bad! Men good!”
She must be related to Judge Judy...
ew no lmfao. they were acting terrible the entire time and bringing up someone’s children in a mass homicide shooting case, is DISGUSTING. he deserved it.
That 1st judge was just way too emotional and over the top.
The patience of the attorneys and judge to not yell ….. shut up and ….. bull#### is amazing
It couldn’t be me 😂😂😂
The stare down 😂😂😂 15:45
The judge ladies just yapping he has a point she’s keeps explaining every action what’s going on also saying he’s having a stare down he pounded his fist. It makes me scared is just 😒😒🙄🙄
#1 - Judge was way out of line. The attorney didn't say anything remotely like a threat toward her children. His words started out to be something to the effect of, "If it was your children that someone brought up like the other side did, you would be upset." Then, somewhat ironically, she went nuts even though her children were NOT spoken of in any negative way, let alone was no threat directed at her children. That reeked of a judge putting on show because she knew it was on TV.
I’m honestly upset the first judge got backlash, I know with court is definitely more complicated even if we don’t like the attorneys defending monsters like this dude taking the lives of his classmates and peers for attention. I definitely feel she lost her cool with them. But his defense team had often reflected so much disrespect towards the victims, I’m glad she at least put them in their place for how they were conducting themselves because we all know the victims or their families can’t do it themselves.
3:50 that lawyer did not threaten the judges children. All he said was that she would also be offended if people were making comments about her children like they were about his.
You would think a judge would be less emotional
And she was offended about it to prove his point
When did the opposing council make these comments? Evidence,
That Florida judge proved the lawyers point by completely misunderstanding what the lawyer said
For real. The guy had a point and she proved it when she completely went off thinking he was talking about her children when he wasnt
@@bobmaddox5860”I didn’t hear anyone attacking your children”
“If it was about your children you’d have heard it”
“THIS MAN IS THREATENING MY CHILDREN”
…I mean wtf is that
Bs
This would suck if judge Judy was the judge for every person on this video 😂😂
😂😂😂
True but, It’d be a better world.
Suck? That would be AWESOME!!
The brooks trial was insane. I watched every minute of it
4:41 I was shocked and rly upset how they all were talking about their children when ppl in the court LOST their children from this monster who killed them in a vile evil way 🤦🏻♀️ 😡
The first interaction wasn't okay. The judge agreed it was out of line but only when it applied to her.
I think that's why she resigned.
Every time Brooks comes up in one of these videos, I just have to skip. If I go the rest of my life without hearing his voice ever again, I’ll die a happy man.
I love the petty judge that makes people write essays 😂😂
The Florida Supreme Court publicly reprimanded the first judge (Elizabeth Scherer) who oversaw the penalty trial of Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz for showing bias toward the prosecution. The unanimous decision followed a recommendation from the Judicial Qualifications Commission. The 15-member commission found that Scherer “unduly chastised” lead public defender Melisa McNeill and her team, wrongly accused one Cruz attorney of threatening her child, and improperly embraced members of the prosecution in the courtroom after the trial’s conclusion. The judge resigned effective June 2023.
I saw one online where the judge got so mad at the public defender, he came off the bench and challenged him to a fist fight in the back room. And they did it. The judge resigned before being removed from the bench and he was also disbarred.
It was absolutely ridiculous. The judge was literally violating the defendants rights and all the defense attorney did was stand up for their client.
And not to mention the whole courtroom fricken applauded for the judge when he assaulted him 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Still don’t know how Binger didn’t lose his law license after that awful exhibition of a trial. Highly unethical at a few times during the trial.
He seemed so condescending
Binger deserves Street Justice.
The brooks trial must have been incredible frustrating for everyone else involved other than the defendant. I know we all understand why but how people didn’t crack the shits is beyond me.
The mfer watched a couple of Law & Order episodes, remembered a couple of big words and thought he could go toe to toe with the law. Judge put him in his place quick lol.
I agree! I watched the entire trial and so many times I wanted to just grab Brooks and shake him. He was so disrespectful it was absolutely infuriating. I can't imagine if my parents or children had been hurt by him then having to listen to his stupidity. Also, equally infuriating was the fact that he was out on bond for a very similar crime just weeks earlier.
To be honest when I was in middle school I wanted to be a judge to yell at people 😂 but that’s not the point of that job 😂😂😂
😆
I tried yelling to my teacher that she was out of order when she told me to stop whispering back and forth with my friend. THANKFULLY she went into momentary shock then started cracking up. I was in first grade. My next 3 years there she'd smile and nod and say "Your Honor" every time I walked by her class. 😂😂😂
The only judge in the world who has the luck and the clearance to do that would probably be Judge Judy! 😂
😂😂😂
The irony in the first judge not getting that guys annoyance at people mentioning his kids, and then she losing her mind for the same reason.
Imagine having a judge sentence you to homework. LMFAO
The last Judge was like help me help you...
"Don't get brazen with me!" with that gorgeous Midwest accent is the best!!!
That first judge is so unprofessional, disrespectful and emotional. What a hypocrite on a power trip.
How funny that she thinks he's silly for a side comment about his children, but as soon as he LITERALLY does the same thing to her like he was done..... HOW DARE HE!!!!!
Oh the hypocrisy 🙄🙄
You do know she was forced to resign after that right
Yeah, ironically, she just totally proved the point he made.
Ok, say what you want about that POS’s defense team, the bizarre way they acted, and the the disrespectful attitude they held towards the prosecution and even some of the families of the victims at times, but when he simply said “Judge, i think if they had brought YOUR children into this, you might have remembered..”
For the judge to then FREAK out, and act like he just “threatened” her children, is INCREDIBLE. She wouldnt even TOLERATE the very mentioning of the phrase “your children” in reference to herself, but when its aimed at the defense attorney, she doesnt say JACK S, doesn’t care, it didn’t matter AT ALL to her.
That whole interaction makes her look VERY biased if you’re able to watch it with an unbiased eye yourself.
In NO WAY did he “threaten her children” as she tried to imply while she was shaming him.
Thats one of the MOST hypocritical moments I’ve ever seen from a judge…
I just can't get over this first judge. Dude says he doesn't appreciate the comments about his children. Judge doesn't care. He says she'd care if they were talking about her children. Her response: "How dare you bring up my children!"
She literally said she wasn't told about any comments being made. And then brings up her children
She said she didn’t remember ever mentioning his children. Our system is screwed up because it’s all about being nice to the criminals. And then people complain when criminals are let out of jail or charges dismissed.
First judge made a fool of herself while power tripping and lost her job because of it!
Ohh , the judge didn't like it but it's ok towards the lawyer ?? This woman shouldn't be a judge !!
the public reprimand was based on the judge's hugging family members after the trial was over, while in her robe. i'm not sure that the exchanges seen in the video were, per se, violations of judicial ethics.
Feelings have no place in a court room!!
I hate when judges act on feelings. I'm sorry if you don't agree and as much as you hate it... judges should act on laws not on but feelings or ego
Judge, he didn't threaten your kids. you're on a power rush
yup and the B*tch got exactly wut she deserved Thats why its not gud to allow females to be judges Soon as its their time of the month they can't control their emotions
The first judge is an emotional trainwreck. There is no place for this kind of emotion when judgement is involved.
I couldn't agree more, insane freakout and needs a psychological evaluation.
judge is a stunner!
I guess they couldn't handle the truth.
14:30 Brooks is not only an EVIL person he's also not very clever, I guess the old adage about being your own lawyer was definitely true in this case !
Lots of...interesting...happenings in this video
Brooks is really the worst case of Dunning-Kruger ever. That's what happens if someone considers himself much smarter than he actually is. So glad that they still managed to get the trial through and sentence him.
That first judge has no idea about rules of civil procedure and ethics. Horrible. An embarrassment to our justice system.
Call me sexist but women shouldn’t be judges man, they’re too emotional, she was just showing who was the boss
Judge Elizabeth was not having it. And I do not blame her.
The first judge was wrong!!
That Judge for the Nikolas Cruz trial had very poor relations with everyone involved with the trial. She always was arguing with them.
E. Scherer was appalling throughout the entire trial in Florida. That she resigned before a decision about her diabolical behaviour was taken, proves, at least to me, that she knew she was completely partial during the whole trial.
what was wrong about her being that way? that kid deserved it. he didn’t deserve anything.
Oh f off, the prosecution was shooting the bird, wasting time, etc. The whole thing was a clown show
@@abrilstorm she's supposed to be impartial... that's the point
@@abrilstorm A judge still has to be as impartial and neutral as possible throughout the whole trial, that's her job and she failed at it. There's a reason she was forced to resign as a judge shortly afterward.
Her bias was visible from space, she’s lucky the jury saved her from a sentence that the office would appeal. She would have gone down as a historical robed goof if they’d had a full trial she botched this badly.
I think the first judge was too emotional. Not suited at all for that position I think you have to be cool headed and act professional at all times. You have to site the law and not your angry feelings. It’s great that she quit for all ! Just the fact that she quit , tells you how unstable and emotional she is. She needs to see a therapist in all respect. Reach out for medical attention, take anger management and stay away from arguments during your period.
I cannot believe that the state of Wisconsin let such an incompetent prosecuting attorney try one of the most high profile cases of the decade. I agree that rittenhouse was not guilty, but they put the prosecutors office to shame.
@@jasonmyneni8605 I don’t know all the facts, but a 17 year old owning an assault rifle and happen to have to use it killing someone for defense? If he knew that itd be so dangerous then don’t go there. And then making money out of it after the trial? Disgusting. Did I kill someone, be it in defense or not, I’d never make money out of it.
Judge Elizabeth Scherer from Parkland shooter trial speaks publicly for first time since resigning after controversial case.
January 8th 2024. CBS MIAMI
This is what she had to say to CBS MIAMI:
"To try to threaten my children and bring up my children is inappropriate," Scherer said. "So I'm very protective of my daughter and looking back, I, I may have overreacted. In other words, maybe that's not what the attorney meant, but I don't feel it's ever, ever appropriate to look at a judge and say, 'Well, if this was your kid.' I mean that is just so far out of line that I will tell you he found the right button to push."
Scherer admits to overreacting during that one exchange.
"I try to maintain a level of, you know, calmness and take a deep breath when somebody's trying to sort of bait me (by) bringing up my daughter," she said. "You know I did lose my temper, and just to put it in context, although I don't know that that's what was meant by it."
But with time has come perspective.
"But long story short, do I think that's what he meant?" she said. "Probably not. Do I think that he was inappropriate? Absolutely!
The JUDGE at Cruz’s trial was way over her head. She fell for the bringing kids into the discussion big time.
You Cruz defenders are the worst
The first judge completely misunderstood what the guy was saying and should not have taken his words personally, but i recall that defense team was unprofessional as well.
The defense of Cruz was awful, but they definitely had a point here. Judge's reaction was totally inappropriate and unprofessional.
That 1st judge seemed unhinged and like she didn't listen to anything including logical arguments.
3:20 That beech of a judge didn't want to be called out on her BS
14:53 “THE DEFENDANT!!!”
Makes me crack up every time. He is so exhausting, even just highlight clips make me angry. I mean- what an insufferable piece of work.
That first judge was talking about "professional ethics", but she clearly doesn't understand the concept herself.
Mr Brooks should have been held in contempt numerous times…
3:40 counsel never threatened the judge's children. never even came close to it. he asked how she'd feel in his shoes if someone were to bring up her kids out of the blue at trial and she not only took exception but somehow read "threat" from it? unhinged.
Great reporting.
The arrogance ! You killed 6 people !
We know how last names link back to our origins. That one dude straight up left to take a nap. Lol