Sorry buffoon he did not Give anyone authority t9 bless same sex marriages 15. Can sinners be blessed? Yes, sinners can be the object of a blessing. Examples include during the liturgy when the priest blesses the whole congregation, when people who are not properly disposed to receive the Eucharist approach the priest for a blessing, and when an unrepentant person approaches a priest in the confessional for absolution. In the latter case, the priest withholds absolution but provides a blessing to the sinner. 16. Are homosexual actions sins? Yes, homosexual acts are sins according to Sacred Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium and this is reconfirmed in Fiducia Supplicans. 17. Can homosexual acts be blessed? No, homosexual acts cannot be the object of a blessing because they are sins. 18. Can those persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts be the object of a blessing? Yes, persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts can be the object of a blessing. 19. Does blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts serve as approval of that sin? No, blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts does not serve as approval of that sin, but, rather, serves as a sign that the person needs God’s graces to overcome that vice. 20. If a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, does that necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing? No, if a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, that does not necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing. 21. May a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other be blessed? Yes, a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts may be blessed, provided that the blessing is given in such a way that it is clear to the couple and to others that it is not their sins that are being blessed or approved, but, rather, that they, as persons, may overcome their vices and that their relationship be transformed from one that is sinful to one that is chaste. In other words, the persons of the same-sex couple are the object of the blessing - not the union of the same-sex couple. 22. Should a blessing be given to such a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin? No, a blessing should not be given to a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin, but only to those who request a blessing because they are looking for strength from God to be chaste. In fact, Fiducia Supplicans expressly envisions the blessings in question for those who wish to follow God’s commands and will for their life. 23. How is it not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed? It is not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed because what the CDF taught in 2021 was that the same-sex unions cannot be blessed precisely as same-sex unions, i.e., as sinful unions, for sin cannot be blessed, i.e., approved. Fiducia Supplicans affirms this teaching, but goes on to say that the persons of the couple can be blessed provided that it is clear that the sins which they may have committed, and may still commit, are not being approved. In this way, Fiducia Supplicans is a further explanation of the 2021 decision by the CDF. 24. What good could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other? The good that could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other is that the couple will be given actual graces from God to overcome their vice and they will realize that their heavenly Father loves them, which will help them overcome their sin. 25. How ought a Catholic respond when faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on the sinfulness of homosexual acts? When faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on homosexual acts is to assert that this is not the case and to show, through the making of proper distinctions found within the document, how this is the case. In fact, such is the duty of ever faithful Catholic according to the Magisterium itself. 26. Can the persons of the same-sex couple receive the blessing simultaneously? Fiducia Supplicans expressly guards against any form of blessing that would result in scandal, confusion or the appearance of blessing the union itself. In light of these qualifications, the blessings should not be administered to the persons of the disordered union simultaneously but individually. 27. Doesn’t the reference in Fiducia Supplicans to “blessings of couples in irregular situations and of couples of the same sex” prove that the object of the blessing is the same-sex union itself? No. Blessings of couples can be understood in two senses: a blessing of the persons of the couple or a blessing of the union of the couple. Fiducia Supplicans goes to great length to note the blessing is for the persons of the couple, not the union of the couple. It is only in this sense that we may speak of blessings for/of same-sex couples (paragraph 31). 28. Are these blessings to be given publicly or privately? Privately, since a public administration of these blessings would inevitably be liturgical (which the document forbids) and lead to confusion and scandal - which Fiducia Supplicans says must be avoided. 29. Is Fiducia Supplicans unclear or ambiguous? No, the document itself is not ambiguous - as a simple reading of the document makes manifestly clear. Unfortunately, many of the critics of the Church’s teaching authority have created confusion by twisting its words or failing to account for what the document says in its entirety. The critics of the Church’s teaching authority have often done the same with Sacred Scripture, and even the words of Our Lord himself; however, it is not Our Lord or Scripture that is at fault, but the worker of mischief who twists the truth. Likewise, Fiducia Supplicans itself is not the problem, rather, the issue arises from the workers of iniquity who corrupt the message of the Church.
During Hogan's WWF days there was an "interviewer" named Brother Love. I'm surprised none of you guys mentioned the good brother. You pups make me feel old.😊
I love Batman as much as the next guy (I’ve actually got a Batman the animated series poster in my room) but seeing Batman being crucified on the bat symbol made me cringe in ways I never thought possible
Sorry buffoon he did not Give anyone authority t9 bless same sex marriages 15. Can sinners be blessed? Yes, sinners can be the object of a blessing. Examples include during the liturgy when the priest blesses the whole congregation, when people who are not properly disposed to receive the Eucharist approach the priest for a blessing, and when an unrepentant person approaches a priest in the confessional for absolution. In the latter case, the priest withholds absolution but provides a blessing to the sinner. 16. Are homosexual actions sins? Yes, homosexual acts are sins according to Sacred Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium and this is reconfirmed in Fiducia Supplicans. 17. Can homosexual acts be blessed? No, homosexual acts cannot be the object of a blessing because they are sins. 18. Can those persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts be the object of a blessing? Yes, persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts can be the object of a blessing. 19. Does blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts serve as approval of that sin? No, blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts does not serve as approval of that sin, but, rather, serves as a sign that the person needs God’s graces to overcome that vice. 20. If a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, does that necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing? No, if a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, that does not necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing. 21. May a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other be blessed? Yes, a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts may be blessed, provided that the blessing is given in such a way that it is clear to the couple and to others that it is not their sins that are being blessed or approved, but, rather, that they, as persons, may overcome their vices and that their relationship be transformed from one that is sinful to one that is chaste. In other words, the persons of the same-sex couple are the object of the blessing - not the union of the same-sex couple. 22. Should a blessing be given to such a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin? No, a blessing should not be given to a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin, but only to those who request a blessing because they are looking for strength from God to be chaste. In fact, Fiducia Supplicans expressly envisions the blessings in question for those who wish to follow God’s commands and will for their life. 23. How is it not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed? It is not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed because what the CDF taught in 2021 was that the same-sex unions cannot be blessed precisely as same-sex unions, i.e., as sinful unions, for sin cannot be blessed, i.e., approved. Fiducia Supplicans affirms this teaching, but goes on to say that the persons of the couple can be blessed provided that it is clear that the sins which they may have committed, and may still commit, are not being approved. In this way, Fiducia Supplicans is a further explanation of the 2021 decision by the CDF. 24. What good could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other? The good that could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other is that the couple will be given actual graces from God to overcome their vice and they will realize that their heavenly Father loves them, which will help them overcome their sin. 25. How ought a Catholic respond when faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on the sinfulness of homosexual acts? When faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on homosexual acts is to assert that this is not the case and to show, through the making of proper distinctions found within the document, how this is the case. In fact, such is the duty of ever faithful Catholic according to the Magisterium itself. 26. Can the persons of the same-sex couple receive the blessing simultaneously? Fiducia Supplicans expressly guards against any form of blessing that would result in scandal, confusion or the appearance of blessing the union itself. In light of these qualifications, the blessings should not be administered to the persons of the disordered union simultaneously but individually. 27. Doesn’t the reference in Fiducia Supplicans to “blessings of couples in irregular situations and of couples of the same sex” prove that the object of the blessing is the same-sex union itself? No. Blessings of couples can be understood in two senses: a blessing of the persons of the couple or a blessing of the union of the couple. Fiducia Supplicans goes to great length to note the blessing is for the persons of the couple, not the union of the couple. It is only in this sense that we may speak of blessings for/of same-sex couples (paragraph 31). 28. Are these blessings to be given publicly or privately? Privately, since a public administration of these blessings would inevitably be liturgical (which the document forbids) and lead to confusion and scandal - which Fiducia Supplicans says must be avoided. 29. Is Fiducia Supplicans unclear or ambiguous? No, the document itself is not ambiguous - as a simple reading of the document makes manifestly clear. Unfortunately, many of the critics of the Church’s teaching authority have created confusion by twisting its words or failing to account for what the document says in its entirety. The critics of the Church’s teaching authority have often done the same with Sacred Scripture, and even the words of Our Lord himself; however, it is not Our Lord or Scripture that is at fault, but the worker of mischief who twists the truth. Likewise, Fiducia Supplicans itself is not the problem, rather, the issue arises from the workers of iniquity who corrupt the message of the Church.
the pope didnt say you can bless same sex marriages but you can bless the people but not the marriage. What the Pope said is that those people can still have the blessings of sick,etc but not marriage
The hubby and I stopped going to church after the kids grew up and moved away. We were thinking of finding one for "mature adults" and going back.... but seeing what the options out there are I think we'll just sit at home. Thanks for saving us the gas. I'll just keep watching your videos. ;-)
We don't care what you think😂 That was incredible. The anger I feel when so many minimize the King of kings is hot, and I pray God judge them according to their works.
@@ErC-oj6rc I'm not a Calvin's, I just enjoy the videos. If one is solid in their faith and doctrine they won't be offended when they disagree with someone. I'm pretty sure though that they do believe in judgement. You may want to verify through research though.
Francis' heresy is not much different from the Methodists. The problem is that Jorge the Horrendous is trying to out protestant the Protestants. When you are capable of offering the sacrifice in the Tridentine Form... I'll consider it. Your political revolt came 500 years too early for my line of thinking. Yeah... not really sure how a Methodist got elected Pope but...
@@bayview5943 Thanks for Sharing. As a Latterday Saint I've noticed that Everybody thinks the Latterday Saints don't believe in Grace. I was recently watching a Video from a TH-camr called Thoughtful Faith on the Subject of Grace and Works from a Latterday Saint Perspective. It was really Beautiful. Jesus Paid it ALL Brother. Salvation is a Gift.
Well, you don't care what he thinks right now. But unlike Pastor Keith, the Pope comes from an unbroken 2000yr old history of Apostolic succession. Keith on the other hand got his Bible degree and was ordained by who exactly? Nobody who had Apostolic succession. But by all means, do not question that or think for yourself. Just clap your fins together like a good seal and keep thinking "Pope bad, 200 different protestant Churches good"
Because I thought no one would try to crucify Batman on the Bat Signal and call themselves Christian. Can Warner Brothers sue for copyright infringement at the very least?
Oh wow! How did you miss including Ken Copeland mixing his blood with that of another pastor and then drinking that?!? I was sooooooooo looking forward to your commentary on that-maybe you’d already decided this? Thank you.
I hate to be so skeptical, but are we ready to call Hulk Hogan "brother" anything? When was the last time a celebrity conversion was genuine? Don't get me wrong, I truly hope it is, but how can we be sure at this point?
I too am quite skeptical when it comes to celebrities doing good things but I think we ought to accept it and celebrate it unless he starts teaching at conferences or getting book deals. Otherwise just let him be a Christian and pray the spirit works in him and leave it there.
If you think Eric Robert’s was great in Best of the Best watch Star 80. That’s his finest role, close your eyes through the naked scenes if you must but Star 80 put Eric Robert’s on the map. Of course now he’s fallen ( pun intended) like a load of bricks if he’s acting along side of Kenneth Copeland 😂😂
On the Batman crucifixion on the bat signal, done in that context I agree with it was tasteless, both to Our Lord and to Adam West's Batman. That was a scene from the original Adam West series plus it was done to a criminal in the Tim Burton movie series that gave Gordon the idea of the bat signal. On the Pope comment; "Personally I declare that I owe the Pope no other obedience than that to Antichrist." - Martin Luther
I ask this as a Catholic (totally not taking your offer up, by the way), who qualifies as an Evangelical? Because I thought I heard somewhere that Calvinists did not count and that only Arminians counted as Evangelicals. Or is it just any low-church Protestant, or can even high-church Protestants count?
That’s actually a great question. I have a sermon on the subject if you’re interested. In simple terms, evangelical is a term normally applied to Protestants who believe the Bible is true and that faith alone in Christ alone is both necessary and sufficient for salvation.
Is “Big Eva mini mall” based on Church on the Rock? They didn’t just crucify Batman; they do it every year with a different character (Iron Man and Toy Story were disturbing). th-cam.com/video/ZK4gM7RC1M0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EhMiHLq34f-Oo85c
Ephesians 1:5 [5]Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, Ephesians 1:11 [11]In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
A Arminian judging a Calvinist? How does it feel? Good?How about the ministers of Mr S in the video? Not one word? Nothing? Nothing to say about ministers of Satan? Enjoy your fake church then..how does that feel? Great?
“You have to face a Holy God on Judgment Day. He sees lust as adultery (Matt. 5:28) and hatred as murder (1 John 3:15). Will you be guilty? Jesus took your punishment on the cross, and rose again defeating death, to save you from Hell. Repent (Luke 13:5) and trust in Him today.” John 3:16, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
Nothing quite like telling an anti calvinist that your lack of care for my opinions doesn't matter to me either, you could almost say, I was predestined to not care, that you don't care about, what I care about. In fact.
@@Isaac_5.56x45 hey. The host said the same thing about the Pope. I may not always agree with the Pope, but I disagree much more often with Calvinists and Baptists.
@Isaac_5.56x45 Not to mention the fact that the U.S.A.'s glorious Republic is predestined to fall, as is evidenced by the DODs willingness to change from a round that would kill our enemies to one that just pisses them off. 😀 Happy New Year, Brother Isaac.
@@jimmu2008 Did you say Pope? I think you spelled cult leader incorrectly. The opinions of man are just that, opinions. But true Biblical Theology can speak for itself, and although I am no John Calvin fan boy, I will say his work is more in line with the Bible than anything than a pope has ever done. Read the Bible for yourself in full context and comparison and see for yourself the flaws of your Roman ways.
@@douglascolquhoun8502 Very funny, I love me some .30 cal as well, but you just can't deny that amazing volume of fire that can be provided from a good ole 5.56 screaming out of a 20 in. barrel at almost 3x the speed of sound with a nice 30 or even 60 round quad stack mag ☺. They won't be treading on me!
I know it sounds cute to use this issue going on in the Catholic Church to further the protestant agenda, and I found it amusing also. However, once we abandon the Catholic Church, we must then wade through the confusion of dozens of different false denominations which had no actual connection to Christ or his Apostles. Forgive us if some of us do not wish to follow some dude who got his degree from bible college on-line and got ordained by some dude who ALSO was not ordained by anyone in line of Apostolic succession, making their "pastorhood" a false office. I'd like to re iterate despite media intentional confusion over this story, the Catholic Church (unlike many "reformed churches today" does not endorse same sex marriage or same sex unions. I am happy to rattle off a few "reformed" churches that do actually do that however. Just let me know folks!
No, all you have to do is read the Bible alone and have faith in Christ alone (not his earthly means of incarnation one would agree if they stuck to the holy scripture alone) and the right denomination for you would be self evident and not hard to wade through at all.
Your point about liberal, formerly Reformed, churches is good. As is the point about the Roman Church being misrepresented in the media. That anyone still believes the Roman Church's lies of Apostlic lineage is laughable, though. This is coming from a Protestant who loves his RC brothers and sisters in Christ.
You're misunderstanding what the true church is. The true church is not being able to trace a denomination back to the time of Christ through some sort of procession. It is all people who have repented and believed in Christ. All who confess Him as Lord and Savior. Those believers meet together locally to make up the church body. Put your faith in Jesus not the church.
I'm old enough to remember when "Is the Pope Catholic?" was a rhetorical question. These days you'd be hard-pressed to find a traditional Catholic willing to blaspheme by answering "Yes." Most Catholics today admit there hasn't been a true Pope in decades, and having a living Pope serving alongside an apostate Antipope for the first time in nearly 600 years didn't help.
That blasphemy joke is my new guilty pleasure 😂
Yes, that was priceless!
Sorry buffoon he did not Give anyone authority t9 bless same sex marriages
15. Can sinners be blessed?
Yes, sinners can be the object of a blessing. Examples include during the liturgy when the priest blesses the whole congregation, when people who are not properly disposed to receive the Eucharist approach the priest for a blessing, and when an unrepentant person approaches a priest in the confessional for absolution. In the latter case, the priest withholds absolution but provides a blessing to the sinner.
16. Are homosexual actions sins?
Yes, homosexual acts are sins according to Sacred Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium and this is reconfirmed in Fiducia Supplicans.
17. Can homosexual acts be blessed?
No, homosexual acts cannot be the object of a blessing because they are sins.
18. Can those persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts be the object of a blessing?
Yes, persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts can be the object of a blessing.
19. Does blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts serve as approval of that sin?
No, blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts does not serve as approval of that sin, but, rather, serves as a sign that the person needs God’s graces to overcome that vice.
20. If a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, does that necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing?
No, if a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, that does not necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing.
21. May a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other be blessed?
Yes, a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts may be blessed, provided that the blessing is given in such a way that it is clear to the couple and to others that it is not their sins that are being blessed or approved, but, rather, that they, as persons, may overcome their vices and that their relationship be transformed from one that is sinful to one that is chaste. In other words, the persons of the same-sex couple are the object of the blessing - not the union of the same-sex couple.
22. Should a blessing be given to such a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin?
No, a blessing should not be given to a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin, but only to those who request a blessing because they are looking for strength from God to be chaste. In fact, Fiducia Supplicans expressly envisions the blessings in question for those who wish to follow God’s commands and will for their life.
23. How is it not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed?
It is not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed because what the CDF taught in 2021 was that the same-sex unions cannot be blessed precisely as same-sex unions, i.e., as sinful unions, for sin cannot be blessed, i.e., approved. Fiducia Supplicans affirms this teaching, but goes on to say that the persons of the couple can be blessed provided that it is clear that the sins which they may have committed, and may still commit, are not being approved. In this way, Fiducia Supplicans is a further explanation of the 2021 decision by the CDF.
24. What good could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other?
The good that could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other is that the couple will be given actual graces from God to overcome their vice and they will realize that their heavenly Father loves them, which will help them overcome their sin.
25. How ought a Catholic respond when faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on the sinfulness of homosexual acts?
When faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on homosexual acts is to assert that this is not the case and to show, through the making of proper distinctions found within the document, how this is the case. In fact, such is the duty of ever faithful Catholic according to the Magisterium itself.
26. Can the persons of the same-sex couple receive the blessing simultaneously?
Fiducia Supplicans expressly guards against any form of blessing that would result in scandal, confusion or the appearance of blessing the union itself. In light of these qualifications, the blessings should not be administered to the persons of the disordered union simultaneously but individually.
27. Doesn’t the reference in Fiducia Supplicans to “blessings of couples in irregular situations and of couples of the same sex” prove that the object of the blessing is the same-sex union itself?
No. Blessings of couples can be understood in two senses: a blessing of the persons of the couple or a blessing of the union of the couple. Fiducia Supplicans goes to great length to note the blessing is for the persons of the couple, not the union of the couple. It is only in this sense that we may speak of blessings for/of same-sex couples (paragraph 31).
28. Are these blessings to be given publicly or privately?
Privately, since a public administration of these blessings would inevitably be liturgical (which the document forbids) and lead to confusion and scandal - which Fiducia Supplicans says must be avoided.
29. Is Fiducia Supplicans unclear or ambiguous?
No, the document itself is not ambiguous - as a simple reading of the document makes manifestly clear. Unfortunately, many of the critics of the Church’s teaching authority have created confusion by twisting its words or failing to account for what the document says in its entirety. The critics of the Church’s teaching authority have often done the same with Sacred Scripture, and even the words of Our Lord himself; however, it is not Our Lord or Scripture that is at fault, but the worker of mischief who twists the truth. Likewise, Fiducia Supplicans itself is not the problem, rather, the issue arises from the workers of iniquity who corrupt the message of the Church.
His pronouns are I/me
I'm only commenting here because I was predestined to do so.
😁
I’m here because I chose to do so
Ditto, see first comment
That's right.
I bet you didn’t even choose that particular wording.
"I hope it was a blast for him, 'cuz it certainly was a 'blasphemy'." Now, that's funny right there now.
🤣
“I have not lied in 18 years.” That’s a level of deception and comedy I was not prepared for 😂
These clips give a whole new context to John 11:35-
"Jesus wept"
I like Brother Terry. Hulk Hogan is an awesome name, but Brother Terry feels the most official.
Since Hogan brought the term “Brother” into the mainstream, my vote is to simply refer to him as “Brother.”
Harbourfreight Doug Wilson... i love you dude! Best truthful comedy on youtube! Truly great brother
Clicked so fast it would make your head spin. Bravo. The end was priceless.
I make a motion to dub Hulk Hogan "Brother Brother".
Seconded!
Nearly snorted at the Todd White leg pulling joke. Thanks for the laugh Pastor Keith!
I’ve been binging all the church soups. Not sure I have done face palm more in awhile. Big Eva is nuts.
That blasphemy line gets me every time 😂
During Hogan's WWF days there was an "interviewer" named Brother Love. I'm surprised none of you guys mentioned the good brother. You pups make me feel old.😊
I love Batman as much as the next guy (I’ve actually got a Batman the animated series poster in my room) but seeing Batman being crucified on the bat symbol made me cringe in ways I never thought possible
The fact that it was the '60s Batman somehow makes it worse.
@@jic1 agreed
you got a thumbs up just for that joke at the end "if you don't like it press the thumbs down button twice" 😂😂😂
That blasphemy joke at the end was a certified preacher joke loved it 😂
I'm reformed Baptist, I disapprove of the bat service.
God help us!
Seriously, I have listened to “trad Caths” complain about Pope Francis and have told them that they sounded like Lutherans.
Sorry buffoon he did not Give anyone authority t9 bless same sex marriages
15. Can sinners be blessed?
Yes, sinners can be the object of a blessing. Examples include during the liturgy when the priest blesses the whole congregation, when people who are not properly disposed to receive the Eucharist approach the priest for a blessing, and when an unrepentant person approaches a priest in the confessional for absolution. In the latter case, the priest withholds absolution but provides a blessing to the sinner.
16. Are homosexual actions sins?
Yes, homosexual acts are sins according to Sacred Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium and this is reconfirmed in Fiducia Supplicans.
17. Can homosexual acts be blessed?
No, homosexual acts cannot be the object of a blessing because they are sins.
18. Can those persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts be the object of a blessing?
Yes, persons who fall into the sin of homosexual acts can be the object of a blessing.
19. Does blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts serve as approval of that sin?
No, blessing a person who habitually falls into the sin of homosexual acts does not serve as approval of that sin, but, rather, serves as a sign that the person needs God’s graces to overcome that vice.
20. If a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, does that necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing?
No, if a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other are blessed, that does not necessarily mean that their sins are being approved by that blessing.
21. May a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other be blessed?
Yes, a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts may be blessed, provided that the blessing is given in such a way that it is clear to the couple and to others that it is not their sins that are being blessed or approved, but, rather, that they, as persons, may overcome their vices and that their relationship be transformed from one that is sinful to one that is chaste. In other words, the persons of the same-sex couple are the object of the blessing - not the union of the same-sex couple.
22. Should a blessing be given to such a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin?
No, a blessing should not be given to a couple who do not desire to overcome their sin, but only to those who request a blessing because they are looking for strength from God to be chaste. In fact, Fiducia Supplicans expressly envisions the blessings in question for those who wish to follow God’s commands and will for their life.
23. How is it not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed?
It is not a contradiction to hold that an ordained minister can bless such a couple in this manner in light of what the CDF taught in 2021 when it ruled that a same-sex union cannot be blessed because what the CDF taught in 2021 was that the same-sex unions cannot be blessed precisely as same-sex unions, i.e., as sinful unions, for sin cannot be blessed, i.e., approved. Fiducia Supplicans affirms this teaching, but goes on to say that the persons of the couple can be blessed provided that it is clear that the sins which they may have committed, and may still commit, are not being approved. In this way, Fiducia Supplicans is a further explanation of the 2021 decision by the CDF.
24. What good could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other?
The good that could possibly come from an ordained minister blessing a couple who habitually fall into the sin of homosexual acts with each other is that the couple will be given actual graces from God to overcome their vice and they will realize that their heavenly Father loves them, which will help them overcome their sin.
25. How ought a Catholic respond when faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on the sinfulness of homosexual acts?
When faced with the commonly held opinion that the Church, in Fiducia Supplicans, has changed her teaching on homosexual acts is to assert that this is not the case and to show, through the making of proper distinctions found within the document, how this is the case. In fact, such is the duty of ever faithful Catholic according to the Magisterium itself.
26. Can the persons of the same-sex couple receive the blessing simultaneously?
Fiducia Supplicans expressly guards against any form of blessing that would result in scandal, confusion or the appearance of blessing the union itself. In light of these qualifications, the blessings should not be administered to the persons of the disordered union simultaneously but individually.
27. Doesn’t the reference in Fiducia Supplicans to “blessings of couples in irregular situations and of couples of the same sex” prove that the object of the blessing is the same-sex union itself?
No. Blessings of couples can be understood in two senses: a blessing of the persons of the couple or a blessing of the union of the couple. Fiducia Supplicans goes to great length to note the blessing is for the persons of the couple, not the union of the couple. It is only in this sense that we may speak of blessings for/of same-sex couples (paragraph 31).
28. Are these blessings to be given publicly or privately?
Privately, since a public administration of these blessings would inevitably be liturgical (which the document forbids) and lead to confusion and scandal - which Fiducia Supplicans says must be avoided.
29. Is Fiducia Supplicans unclear or ambiguous?
No, the document itself is not ambiguous - as a simple reading of the document makes manifestly clear. Unfortunately, many of the critics of the Church’s teaching authority have created confusion by twisting its words or failing to account for what the document says in its entirety. The critics of the Church’s teaching authority have often done the same with Sacred Scripture, and even the words of Our Lord himself; however, it is not Our Lord or Scripture that is at fault, but the worker of mischief who twists the truth. Likewise, Fiducia Supplicans itself is not the problem, rather, the issue arises from the workers of iniquity who corrupt the message of the Church.
If Episcopals are "Catholics with half the guilt," then Lutherans and Presbyterians are "Catholic with a complaint dept."
Hope it was a blast for you cause it was a blasphemy 🤣🤣 Priceless
The "Harbor Freight Doug Wilson" 😂
It also gets better when you realize that hulk is a Baptist ❤
First time watching your channel ... gotta say I loved the "blast for me". 😁
the pope didnt say you can bless same sex marriages but you can bless the people but not the marriage. What the Pope said is that those people can still have the blessings of sick,etc but not marriage
I tried explaining that. Nobody gets it.
It’s interesting how the media is reporting this . Even this guy seems to have it wrong. Thanking for the clarification.Hate the sin not the sinner
Awesome!
I agree it was a blast for me.
Had to skip a harbor freight commercial before the video. They catching on. Lol
The hubby and I stopped going to church after the kids grew up and moved away. We were thinking of finding one for "mature adults" and going back.... but seeing what the options out there are I think we'll just sit at home. Thanks for saving us the gas. I'll just keep watching your videos. ;-)
Get your butt in church, with all due respect
Love this! Keep up the good work.
I'm a newer sub but I sure hope. This is a series
Yes it is. There is a playlist on the channel. This was our 11th episode
I liked 3 times.
“The Harbor Freight Doug Wilson” !!!!!!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 😊
These folks are sure doing the work of confusing the lost.
We don't care what you think😂
That was incredible.
The anger I feel when so many minimize the King of kings is hot, and I pray God judge them according to their works.
I thought Calvinists didn't believe in being Judged by Works.
@@ErC-oj6rc I'm not a Calvin's, I just enjoy the videos. If one is solid in their faith and doctrine they won't be offended when they disagree with someone.
I'm pretty sure though that they do believe in judgement. You may want to verify through research though.
Francis' heresy is not much different from the Methodists. The problem is that Jorge the Horrendous is trying to out protestant the Protestants.
When you are capable of offering the sacrifice in the Tridentine Form...
I'll consider it.
Your political revolt came 500 years too early for my line of thinking.
Yeah... not really sure how a Methodist got elected Pope but...
@@bayview5943 Thanks for Sharing. As a Latterday Saint I've noticed that Everybody thinks the Latterday Saints don't believe in Grace. I was recently watching a Video from a TH-camr called Thoughtful Faith on the Subject of Grace and Works from a Latterday Saint Perspective. It was really Beautiful. Jesus Paid it ALL Brother. Salvation is a Gift.
yippee amen amen yippee
inspite of youtube thanks for reminding us that we don;t care what the pope thinks
Well, you don't care what he thinks right now. But unlike Pastor Keith, the Pope comes from an unbroken 2000yr old history of Apostolic succession. Keith on the other hand got his Bible degree and was ordained by who exactly? Nobody who had Apostolic succession.
But by all means, do not question that or think for yourself. Just clap your fins together like a good seal and keep thinking "Pope bad, 200 different protestant Churches good"
Because I thought no one would try to crucify Batman on the Bat Signal and call themselves Christian. Can Warner Brothers sue for copyright infringement at the very least?
HAHAH Keith is so funny.
I got that blasphemy joke. It took me a second to get it.
If you love Jesus, you'll have Batman and Robin in your service...
Oh wow! How did you miss including Ken Copeland mixing his blood with that of another pastor and then drinking that?!?
I was sooooooooo looking forward to your commentary on that-maybe you’d already decided this?
Thank you.
I did miss commenting on that, and I will put that in my notes for a future episode. Thank you!
Good pun about Todd White pulling your leg
Brother Terry
#denominations ideas (i.e. their view of):
- coffee with Jesus ("quiet time")
- rapture (or not)
- baptism (live action please!)
Hogan's now Brother, Brother
Yes!!! Best of the Best!! #80sKids
Brother Hulk
Brother hogan
Twas a blast for me, too. In the realm of muppetry
Greetings to brother Terry “Hulk” Hogan!
It’s okay to say brother thh! It’s not rude; it’s love.
Haha! Daddy plays to win. You’re supposed to spot them points. Just kidding. Thank you for the video.
Love it ❤❤❤😂😂😂😂
Wow I cannot believe that progressive pastor said that
Did you use a green screen to make a blue screen?
Pride goes before a fall. Sorry Jesse.
Big Eva never fails to deliver cringes.
Udaman ! 👍
This isn't Copeland's first movie. He made at least one cowboy movie when he was younger. I think he used to sing, too.
that is a good question, why were they talking to a snake?
Brother 24" Pythons LOL.. I would call him Brother..
It certainly was a blasphemy.
What about Hulk Bro-gan?
Keith, where is the RAPTURE bologna debate w Spencer????
I mentioned it in the video. It’s coming in January
I hate to be so skeptical, but are we ready to call Hulk Hogan "brother" anything? When was the last time a celebrity conversion was genuine? Don't get me wrong, I truly hope it is, but how can we be sure at this point?
He did an interview and talked about his conversion on Rogan. See what you think.
I too am quite skeptical when it comes to celebrities doing good things but I think we ought to accept it and celebrate it unless he starts teaching at conferences or getting book deals. Otherwise just let him be a Christian and pray the spirit works in him and leave it there.
He is baptized. He is a Christian. Whether he is the elect or not is not for us to worry about.
Nothing sunny about the Sunshine Cathedral.
Arturo Bastes should fr join us
I wonder what pronoun the United Methodist “pastor” would use for hulk Hogan 🤔
If you think Eric Robert’s was great in Best of the Best watch Star 80. That’s his finest role, close your eyes through the naked scenes if you must but Star 80 put Eric Robert’s on the map. Of course now he’s fallen ( pun intended) like a load of bricks if he’s acting along side of Kenneth Copeland 😂😂
On the Batman crucifixion on the bat signal, done in that context I agree with it was tasteless, both to Our Lord and to Adam West's Batman. That was a scene from the original Adam West series plus it was done to a criminal in the Tim Burton movie series that gave Gordon the idea of the bat signal.
On the Pope comment;
"Personally I declare that I owe the Pope no other obedience than that to Antichrist." - Martin Luther
Terry “The Brother” Hogan
I ask this as a Catholic (totally not taking your offer up, by the way), who qualifies as an Evangelical? Because I thought I heard somewhere that Calvinists did not count and that only Arminians counted as Evangelicals. Or is it just any low-church Protestant, or can even high-church Protestants count?
That’s actually a great question. I have a sermon on the subject if you’re interested. In simple terms, evangelical is a term normally applied to Protestants who believe the Bible is true and that faith alone in Christ alone is both necessary and sufficient for salvation.
Bishop Poofie there at the end needs to repent of his unbelief and be save by Christ.
😂😂 bishop poofie!
That Batman skit made me nauseous. 🤢
the last one lacks SUPERIOR THEOLOGY.
Is “Big Eva mini mall” based on Church on the Rock? They didn’t just crucify Batman; they do it every year with a different character (Iron Man and Toy Story were disturbing).
th-cam.com/video/ZK4gM7RC1M0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EhMiHLq34f-Oo85c
United Methodist prove Whitfield was right concerning the Wesley's....partly joking.
And the blasphemies and sacrileges amongst the "modern christian" and RC churches continue...😖🤦♀️
What blasphemy?
A Calvinist joking about exhaustive moral analyses? Now I done seen all.
Ephesians 1:5
[5]Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
Ephesians 1:11
[11]In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated
according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
A Arminian judging a Calvinist? How does it feel? Good?How about the ministers of Mr S in the video? Not one word? Nothing? Nothing to say about ministers of Satan? Enjoy your fake church then..how does that feel? Great?
When it comes to Hulk Hogan, I prefer to call him: Washed up!
“You have to face a Holy God on Judgment Day. He sees lust as adultery (Matt. 5:28) and hatred as murder (1 John 3:15). Will you be guilty? Jesus took your punishment on the cross, and rose again defeating death, to save you from Hell. Repent (Luke 13:5) and trust in Him today.” John 3:16, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
@ 5:10
HERETIC!!!!!
There's nothing quite like telling a Calvinist we don't care what you think.
Nothing quite like telling an anti calvinist that your lack of care for my opinions doesn't matter to me either, you could almost say, I was predestined to not care, that you don't care about, what I care about.
In fact.
@@Isaac_5.56x45 hey. The host said the same thing about the Pope. I may not always agree with the Pope, but I disagree much more often with Calvinists and Baptists.
@Isaac_5.56x45 Not to mention the fact that the U.S.A.'s glorious Republic is predestined to fall, as is evidenced by the DODs willingness to change from a round that would kill our enemies to one that just pisses them off. 😀 Happy New Year, Brother Isaac.
@@jimmu2008 Did you say Pope?
I think you spelled cult leader incorrectly.
The opinions of man are just that, opinions. But true Biblical Theology can speak for itself, and although I am no John Calvin fan boy, I will say his work is more in line with the Bible than anything than a pope has ever done.
Read the Bible for yourself in full context and comparison and see for yourself the flaws of your Roman ways.
@@douglascolquhoun8502 Very funny, I love me some .30 cal as well, but you just can't deny that amazing volume of fire that can be provided from a good ole 5.56 screaming out of a 20 in. barrel at almost 3x the speed of sound with a nice 30 or even 60 round quad stack mag ☺.
They won't be treading on me!
You guys are not understanding predestination. Terrible how you make it a joke.
I know it sounds cute to use this issue going on in the Catholic Church to further the protestant agenda, and I found it amusing also. However, once we abandon the Catholic Church, we must then wade through the confusion of dozens of different false denominations which had no actual connection to Christ or his Apostles. Forgive us if some of us do not wish to follow some dude who got his degree from bible college on-line and got ordained by some dude who ALSO was not ordained by anyone in line of Apostolic succession, making their "pastorhood" a false office.
I'd like to re iterate despite media intentional confusion over this story, the Catholic Church (unlike many "reformed churches today" does not endorse same sex marriage or same sex unions. I am happy to rattle off a few "reformed" churches that do actually do that however. Just let me know folks!
No, all you have to do is read the Bible alone and have faith in Christ alone (not his earthly means of incarnation one would agree if they stuck to the holy scripture alone) and the right denomination for you would be self evident and not hard to wade through at all.
Your point about liberal, formerly Reformed, churches is good. As is the point about the Roman Church being misrepresented in the media.
That anyone still believes the Roman Church's lies of Apostlic lineage is laughable, though. This is coming from a Protestant who loves his RC brothers and sisters in Christ.
You're misunderstanding what the true church is. The true church is not being able to trace a denomination back to the time of Christ through some sort of procession. It is all people who have repented and believed in Christ. All who confess Him as Lord and Savior. Those believers meet together locally to make up the church body. Put your faith in Jesus not the church.
You need to learn the difference between Catholic and catholic.
I'm old enough to remember when "Is the Pope Catholic?" was a rhetorical question. These days you'd be hard-pressed to find a traditional Catholic willing to blaspheme by answering "Yes." Most Catholics today admit there hasn't been a true Pope in decades, and having a living Pope serving alongside an apostate Antipope for the first time in nearly 600 years didn't help.