This is America's MIM-104 Patriot Missile

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2022
  • The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, the primary of its kind used by the United States Army and several allied states. It is manufactured by the U.S. defense contractor Raytheon and derives its name from the radar component of the weapon system. The AN/MPQ-53 at the heart of the system is known as the "Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target" which is a backronym for PATRIOT.
    Check out these top picks for you:
    • GBU-53/B Stormbreaker:...
    • Meet the JDAM: America...
    • This is GAU-8 Avenger:...
    🔔 Subscribe !
    / @usmilitary_news
    🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
    ---------------------------------------------
    📲 Facebook ► / usnmil
    🐦 Twitter ► / usmil_news
    Thanks
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
    @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe ปีที่แล้ว +680

    Lots of people trashed the patriot system and claimed s400/500 was superior. Those people have no idea what they are talking about. Patriot is constantly updated with cutting edge tech while Russia and China use our processors from our coffee machines.

    • @williampaz2092
      @williampaz2092 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      😂🤣😂🤣

    • @pmnichols10
      @pmnichols10 ปีที่แล้ว

      The patriot is a complete fraud since the beginning. It failed to intercept a single scud missile in the Iraq war and it keeps failing to intercept most home made rockets the Palestinian fire at Israel.
      And that's the real reason it will never be deployed in Ukraine.
      ...oh, and btw, the Soviet era S300 are still better than anything the west has and Russia already has S600 and S700 coming down the pipe, the US is more than 20 years behind in technology.

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe ปีที่แล้ว +134

      Like I said, people don't know what they are talking about. America did not have its patriot system in Saudi during the 2019 Houthi drone attack. Saudi's did have an old export version that never saw an upgrade since the 90's. It had about 20 missiles versus an attack of over 100 drones. You don't use patriot on drones. The USA has C-ram, jamming, and anti-done drones for their assets. Patriot is for missiles. Not drones.

    • @pmnichols10
      @pmnichols10 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MardukTheSunGodInsideMe like I said, other than the fraudulent tests in which the patriot hits a target that's being illuminated from the ground with a laser you don't have a single documented case of the patriot hitting ANYTHING AT ALL...not one miserable interception.

    • @davidreynoso8593
      @davidreynoso8593 ปีที่แล้ว

      Israel & Ukraine Destroy s-400 - missile systems. ... ..

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 ปีที่แล้ว +219

    My Father (R.I.P) worked on this system, I'm sure he would be proud, Thank You U.S. Military News and Sam, for this excellent Video. 👍 🇺🇲

    • @user-yj1on3bf1v
      @user-yj1on3bf1v ปีที่แล้ว

      no, he looks at it from there as a shame, the United States kills people and sends tens of billions of dollars of weapons to Ukraine to kill hundreds of thousands. This is a disgrace to your country. Read the bible, it says how your false country will be destroyed.

    • @millwookie
      @millwookie ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-yj1on3bf1v your 🚽 "country" attacked lonely peaceful Ukraine so stfu you rusian 🚽

    • @user-yj1on3bf1v
      @user-yj1on3bf1v ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@millwookie it's lie, learn history

    • @josephpacchetti5997
      @josephpacchetti5997 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-yj1on3bf1v Opinions Vary.

    • @CB-zt6qs
      @CB-zt6qs ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-yj1on3bf1v how about sending nothing? Maybe that would be better. lol.

  • @iuhuanfrancis3603
    @iuhuanfrancis3603 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    S300, S400, S500 and S1000. Puctriot Missle is still the BEST!

  • @kittycatcage
    @kittycatcage ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Seth Rogan's narration of this video was articulate and informative. Thank you.

  • @johnstone1159
    @johnstone1159 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    We owe Brigadier General Robert “Bob” Drolet our thanks for Patriot’s missile intercept capability. Originally, Patriot was an anti-aircraft system. In 1990 Saddam Hussain targeted Israel with SKUD ballistic missiles. The U.S. did not want Israel to participate in Desert Storm due to the coalition’s Arab nations involvement. So, General Drolet was tasked with re-programing Patriot on-the-fly to convert it into an anti-ballistic-missile interceptor. We all sat at home and watched the first Patriot/Scud intercepts on TV. The mission to keep Israel out of the war was a success thanks to Patriot and Bob Drolet - the smartest man I’ve ever known. Bob proved my assessment before Congress after the 1st Gulf war. An MIT professor challenged the Army’s claims of effectiveness for Patriot/SKUD intercepts based on video evidence. Bob, in his usual manner, made the academic look foolish because he failed to account for video shutter speed when reviewing 6000 mph intercepts. When I worked for Major Drolet in NATO in the mid ‘70s, he was always the “go-to” guy among our senior commanders. Lockheed Martin recognized that when he retired from active duty, making him head of all their space programs. This is a man America should be rightfully proud of, and I was very fortunate to call him my friend. God’s speed. Bob.

    • @richgod7511
      @richgod7511 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As a man who shares Bob's last name I thank you for bringing attention to His legacy and commitment to the improvement of the United States of America. I just went down the Robert Drolet rabbit hole and what an awesome journey that was. I too was born in Mass. and my father was a veteran of the cuban missile crisis. He served on a destroyer in the blockade and was Captains guard. My dad, Richard Drolet was a marine and a proud one at that. Good to see other Drolet's serving their country. Thanks again for the info on this amazing man.

    • @domingobustos5320
      @domingobustos5320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree..too many are acknowledged that makes you go hmmmm..but..truly good individuals..they know their worth and seek alot more than accolades..but they help..lol 😉🤣

    • @alienbotfarm187
      @alienbotfarm187 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If only usa stayed away from war...

  • @overtheGarage-ue8lh
    @overtheGarage-ue8lh ปีที่แล้ว +16

    So today the Russians tested the Patriot missile battery in Ukraine using a hypersonic missile. Patriot came through with flying colors. This is good for Ukraine, NATO and the US. Patriot now super qualifies as a deterrent.

    • @user-tf4lk4fm7i
      @user-tf4lk4fm7i ปีที่แล้ว

      What 😂. So you closed your eyes when watching the video of the Patriot battery missing and getting destroyed at the very end?

    • @warrax111
      @warrax111 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@user-tf4lk4fm7i From footage, it is not clear, if it was destroyed, or lightly damaged.
      There's no evidance, they didnt allow to cam-shoot it to anyone after hit.
      I believe more Russia thought, if it would survive, they would make footage, that Russia didnt destroy it.

    • @overtheGarage-ue8lh
      @overtheGarage-ue8lh ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@user-tf4lk4fm7i Are you enjoying all the great toys we send your way in Ukraine? I know Ukraine loves them! We have lots more we are sending. To Russia with Love! Made in the USA!

    • @user-tf4lk4fm7i
      @user-tf4lk4fm7i ปีที่แล้ว

      @@warrax111 No, they arrested the only people that had evidence of its destruction. But let me play Devil’s advocate here and say it wasn’t destroyed. What was the massive explosion on the ground then? The Kinzhal itself doesn’t have that size of conventional payload. So it must have hit something explosive, in either case, the Patriot failed to stop it.

    • @user-tq6hq6cr2b
      @user-tq6hq6cr2b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​​​​​​@@overtheGarage-ue8lh оружие США не представляет серьезную угрозу для Российской Федерации. Эффективность патриота порядка 60%+-. Это хорошее заявление, но не более, напомните - сколько ф 35 были в реальных боях, а не на счете в банке?

  • @markmitchell457
    @markmitchell457 ปีที่แล้ว +253

    Easier interface means faster training for Ukrainian troops.
    That's good thing!
    🇺🇦🇺🇸

    • @josecabezas6159
      @josecabezas6159 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      exelente

    • @jacobrobichaux1576
      @jacobrobichaux1576 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I believe some of the troops over here are already trained in how to use them so they can go back and train everyone else

    • @unitedstates907
      @unitedstates907 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      That's right! Best regards from Norway. I would love to see the American MIM-104 Patriot Surface-to-air missile system in Ukraine soon. We have sent our NASAMS, but it is just a fraction compared to the U.S. contribution, I know. But together we are strong allies and we can definitely beat Putin's totalitarian regime together. it is just an engineering problem and we have the intellectual manpower to deal with the task with ease.

    • @bekeneel
      @bekeneel ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@unitedstates907 Everything helps :) if only more powerful countries would step up like israel, turkey etc, ukraine could be immune to russian missiles. Would be very nice if US were to test their sam systems in Ukraine, it's the best irl testing of the systems & I would combine those patriots that finally will be shipped, with thaad for example too why not.. Aegis is only for ships right? :)

    • @sticky59
      @sticky59 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It under performed in middle east and Yemen. Ukraine is getting 1 battery, and not right away. Will make no difference what so ever and will be lucky to last the month after operational.

  • @terryfreeman1018
    @terryfreeman1018 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man, I love this channel.

  • @olga7454
    @olga7454 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    God save America 🇺🇸 and Ukraine 🇺🇦 Experienced ruzzian missile attack 30 mins ago in Kyiv. Patriot system is the best!

  • @jakesantangelo4
    @jakesantangelo4 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.

    • @KBTcraze
      @KBTcraze 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      My brain hurts

  • @David030973
    @David030973 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I worked with HAWK in Germany. It was very precise....

  • @stoney_the_joker
    @stoney_the_joker ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thats amazing. Thank you for your service.

  • @flyingtree5346
    @flyingtree5346 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Incase of a red alert, the Patriots take 25 minutes to get ready while it takes only 5 minutes for the s-400 to be ready.
    That could be the difference between destruction and salvation

    • @user-ym5bl2vl7c
      @user-ym5bl2vl7c 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Patriot is now equiped with next generation LTAMDS radar,capable of deflecting cruise,ballistic missiles and drones from all directions.😆😆

    • @user-ym5bl2vl7c
      @user-ym5bl2vl7c 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Patriot has more advanced radar than s400.

    • @kokushibox8384
      @kokushibox8384 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is a video in crimea ukraine that s400 let storm shadow missile pass through the system ..

  • @HELIFASO
    @HELIFASO ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you from Kyiv. Today they saved our lives again.

    • @olga7454
      @olga7454 ปีที่แล้ว

      And just now ❤🇺🇸

  • @dpelpal
    @dpelpal ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Russia: We are having supersonic!
    USA: We don't know who you are, and we have Patriots.

    • @user-nr3th5lm1y
      @user-nr3th5lm1y ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ahahaha yes yes)) A patriot was destroyed in Kiev))

    • @dpelpal
      @dpelpal ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-nr3th5lm1y That's why it shot down 6 hypersonic missiles today 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @RED_WINDOW
      @RED_WINDOW ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-nr3th5lm1y the Patriot was not destroyed, but only slightly damaged, but already fully returned to service, which was confirmed by the Pentagon, but you continue to believe Russian fairy tales

    • @user-tf4lk4fm7i
      @user-tf4lk4fm7i ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dpelpal Doesn't even make sense what you just said.

  • @MissouriOzarksMusicandVideo
    @MissouriOzarksMusicandVideo หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was assigned to a Patriot battery in Fort Bliss in 1987. The system's sure changed a lot!

  • @arturscherbakov2543
    @arturscherbakov2543 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Now, patriot PAC-3 anti-ballistics capabilities were proven in Ukraine - 7 "super-duper" x-47 "hypersonic" missiles were sucessfully intercepted.

  • @rwolfe180
    @rwolfe180 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    love the content - keep it coming

  • @Silverfox8668
    @Silverfox8668 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!!! Thanks

  • @robrob3907
    @robrob3907 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I was in the Army and was a radar op for 12 years on the Patriot system. 1999-2011. The system usually always is just a piece in a network of systems. Threat assessments are done hourly. Other systems or pieces like manpads Stingers, etc. Are usually incorporated. Thaad as well. With the number of other system incorporated in ukraine I see this system being a significant piece added to their defense. And whoever said this system was ineffective against the Houthis you're wrong. Ask them the humber of misses shot down..

  • @Chris1982416
    @Chris1982416 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This video brings back memories

    • @offthetrail636
      @offthetrail636 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      14E here

    • @yuval1588
      @yuval1588 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      of what?

    • @angelam.stoutart3824
      @angelam.stoutart3824 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      14T here! Launcher Dog

    • @Chris1982416
      @Chris1982416 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@angelam.stoutart3824 what years? I’m 2000-2007 E 3/43 11th A 3/2 31st A 1/1 31st and 94th AAMDC HHB 31st

  • @relaxingsounds6168
    @relaxingsounds6168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    After seeing it explode, what can we say? It can produce a very expensive fireworks show, that's pretty much what it can do.

    • @Appowl
      @Appowl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While defending the city

  • @schattenkind777
    @schattenkind777 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Thank you 🇺🇸 USA, Government and People of US for helping 🇺🇦 out with PATRIOT! 🗽

    • @rjfontenotiii
      @rjfontenotiii ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I work at a place that builds part of the PAC-3. I am so glad that we are finally sending these to you guys. There is no reason for Russia to target civilians, and I hope these missiles save many Ukrainian lives.

    • @abc123fhdi
      @abc123fhdi ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It won't be able to intercept hypersonic missiles that Russia has.

    • @theobserver6639
      @theobserver6639 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good job keeping causing problems

    • @samiullahayan4210
      @samiullahayan4210 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are not helping Ukraine they just destroy Ukraine. they will run away very soon like Afghanistan . prince herry rivels British and Us army how killed innocent afgani civilians. 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

    • @VoyagerEugen
      @VoyagerEugen ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@abc123fhdi that statement aged badly

  • @andarabuanasakti2947
    @andarabuanasakti2947 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Luar biasa teknologinya 👍👍

  • @joekj6274
    @joekj6274 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It shows the US military system is versatile and practical to suit proper upgrading systems good jobs but there are flow issues I see

  • @kempmt1
    @kempmt1 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I’m sure the Patriot is an awesome system, but I still like how the S300/S400 launches out of their launch canisters

  • @jbx.7995
    @jbx.7995 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I believe that the patriot is connected to X37b...really also to detect missiles launched..ty4sharing great stuff 👍

  • @HelloWelcome2024
    @HelloWelcome2024 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ukraine showed the world that the patriot can intercept hypersonic.

    • @user-rx7oc6vk6w
      @user-rx7oc6vk6w ปีที่แล้ว

      Patriot cant intercept hypersonic. The truth is Kinzhal isnt hypersonic missile. Ukrainian military said that in the moment it was intercept the speed of Kinzhal was only 3.5 mach. All rusian superduper weapons are bull..hit

    • @HelloWelcome2024
      @HelloWelcome2024 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@user-rx7oc6vk6w according to Russia they are hypersonic.

    • @user-rx7oc6vk6w
      @user-rx7oc6vk6w ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@HelloWelcome2024 Russia lying as always.

  • @sonnynguyen9907
    @sonnynguyen9907 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    God bless America and therefore the freedom world!

    • @Kawaii_Boy3
      @Kawaii_Boy3 ปีที่แล้ว

      >America = Freedom and peace
      >America who financing war in Ukraine

    • @Vlad__b1401
      @Vlad__b1401 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yessir, God Bless USA, God Bless Freedom

    • @pipoypipoy9761
      @pipoypipoy9761 ปีที่แล้ว

      World police?

  • @JM-bv5fv
    @JM-bv5fv ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They are easy target for Shahed:)

  • @mauriziosant1658
    @mauriziosant1658 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must have one for New Year's Eve.😉

  • @DonovanHaumpy
    @DonovanHaumpy ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ukrainian soldiers just landed in my town to train at Ft.Sill artillery base and learn how to use this weapon in the Ukraine and Russia war, I hear explosions that rattle my house windows every other minute

    • @MinhTran-fc7jl
      @MinhTran-fc7jl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nice, hope they learn fast and return home to kick poopin'sass

    • @arturscherbakov2543
      @arturscherbakov2543 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MinhTran-fc7jl yeap, now, patriot PAC-3 anti-ballistics capabilities were proven in Ukraine - 7 "super-duper" x-47 "hypersonic" missiles were sucessfully intercepted. And it's absolutly amazing result, especially concidering how this missiles are danger and destructive.

    • @sellerclothes2800
      @sellerclothes2800 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arturscherbakov2543 hahahaha intercepted really ? Yes they stopped the Kinjal by standing on its way

  • @RudolfdeLang
    @RudolfdeLang ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Holy moly 😮

  • @TheLorax26827
    @TheLorax26827 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That things missile looks like one of those rockets you launch in science class

  • @Georgi_Slavov79
    @Georgi_Slavov79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can it be directed by a AWACS radar(sees further than ground based r)?

    • @yankees29
      @yankees29 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AWACS are an amazing piece of machinery.

  • @thedude6867
    @thedude6867 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This Missiles will make Orks mad

    • @hostcrane778
      @hostcrane778 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you're geh

  • @chickendinner2562
    @chickendinner2562 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We NEED laser tech defense. They showed it about 6 years ago. The military was testing it. literally laser beams to destroy incoming targets at the speed of light. THAT is the stuff we need to get our edge back. We have lost our edge significantly over the past decade becuase our big enemies have caught up and team up

    • @thetruth7633
      @thetruth7633 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Who are "big enemies"?

    • @l3gendarylag805
      @l3gendarylag805 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thetruth7633 China.. Russia.. Not necessarily enemies but not allies

    • @xinyaoyin2238
      @xinyaoyin2238 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      laser defense tech only exists in PPT, american propaganda only

  • @olegzastavnyi6402
    @olegzastavnyi6402 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice, we will get this

  • @colleencourtney4484
    @colleencourtney4484 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Thank you and God Bless you ALL in the Military. I pray for protection around each and every one of you, and the Peace of God, beyond human understanding, fill your hearts and minds wherever you are. WWG1WGA

  • @shawnj1679
    @shawnj1679 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yep, I live 300 miles South Of Alaska's ICBM defensive missile site. I believe CA also has about 20 of them, but most are here up near Fairbanks. And now they have the newly operational Clear Space force station to help them target those ICBM"s at a cost of over 500 million dollars to build the base. And the LRDR "Long range discrimination Radar" system cost over 1.5 Billion.

  • @Sin3xtreme
    @Sin3xtreme ปีที่แล้ว

    how does it hold up to artillery, can it shootdown an artillery shell

  • @amnnet7300
    @amnnet7300 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THE REALITY IS THAT The US military is the most technologically advanced force in the world ever and, most likely, AT ALL LEVELS... LAND SEA AND AIR, the most fearsome fighting machine of all time
    .... no matter where it hides, the target will be hit and destroyed
    .... GOD BLESS AND PROTECT ALWAYS AND IN EVERYTHING THE BRAVE AND EROIC PEOPLE OF UKRAINE

  • @TheNaqoyqatZ
    @TheNaqoyqatZ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still slightly upset they didn't manage to name it some variant of Missile Command.

  • @Jesus_Christ_Is_Lord77
    @Jesus_Christ_Is_Lord77 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    God Bless the USA💪. God bless Ukraine💪💪💪

  • @machdaddy6451
    @machdaddy6451 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Reminds me of the Missile Command game from the eighties.

  • @offthetrail636
    @offthetrail636 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a 14E I’m glad I live in the middle of the country now that I no longer serve. Nothing is getting past our navy then our Patriot missiles then our jets then our citizens with guns. We love America

  • @johnhopkins6260
    @johnhopkins6260 ปีที่แล้ว

    How long is Patriot training school? (or, is this a specialization, within Rocketry school?)

    • @curtislarson1487
      @curtislarson1487 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was a 24 t tda. 13 months with basic training. But I was in fire direction squad HHB 4/3 ada then bravo battery during the deployment to giessen Germany I had 96 missiles at like 21 years .. Pretty sure it all different now

    • @angelam.stoutart3824
      @angelam.stoutart3824 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends on the MOS. 14E is 20 weeks and 14T is 13 weeks.

  • @vegass04
    @vegass04 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Why there was no mention of the new radar that was selected for the Patriot system, built by the Raytheon, that will, for the first time, give the Patriot system a 360 degrees coverage. This is huge. If only Patriot received new launch tubes that could be positioned vertically and therefore give the missiles the capability to shoot at 360 degrees, at all direction, which is currently impossible since the missiles can target a threat that comes exclusively from the front. If an enemy fires a long range cruise missile and programe it to attack the Patriot battery from behind, the new radar will be able to see it but the missiles would be useless.

    • @kiabtoomlauj6249
      @kiabtoomlauj6249 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The US Pentagon usually has enough money to pay experts who do nothing but sit down to think every which way to do a few very important tasks (that cost BILLIONS of dollars).
      For example, while installing 3-D nozzles on top end fighter jets (Su-35, Su-57, etc) is very nice looking... in actual wars, where speed, energy efficiency, & linear acceleration are more important than slow-motion crowd pleasing, public air show stunts (which the Su-35 and other Russian jets are better at)... the 2-D of the F-22 & as well as the easier traditional exhaust technologies in the F-35 is more than enough.
      Why, for example, design a nuclear sub that is twice as big as what the US has, as its top class, in the Ohio, of close to 20,000 tons... when you could operate 2-3 of those, being in 2-3 difference places, as opposed to operating just one 48,000 ton sub, in ONE place?
      The might Nimitz and Ford classes of aircraft carriers, however, are needed, if you have to project real fire power around the world... because each is part of a battle group of 15 - 20 ships, including a nuclear sub or so... each battle ground having the power to obliterate 90% of the armed forces of the world...
      Anyway, what is the benefit of designing & operating only a dozen or so bombers (Russia's Tupolev Tu-160, at Mach 2+.... that could carry 5 or 10 or 20 nuclear bombs of 1 MEGATON blast yield ... when you could use 100s to THOUSANDS of F-15, F-16, F-22, & F-35 to carry more than one B61 gravity nukes that may have a yield blast of close to 500 KILOTON already?
      Remember, the 10K pound FAT MAN bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki was only TWENTY ONE (21) Kilotons & it already had such a devastating impact!
      Besides, ICBMs fly up to Mach 26 .... each ICBM may be carrying up to 14 smaller MIRVs, each smaller warhead preprogrammed to fly to a different target, once released from the mother ICBM at terminal velocity, each smaller MIRV warhead being capable of having up to a 200 KILOTON BLAST YIELD....
      And if ICBMs are used, there will be 100s to thousands of cheap, non-nulcear warheads flying in the mix, to confuse the defense missiles of the enemies... so intercepting many hundreds of ICBMs & many THOUSANDS of smaller MIRVs are a fool's errand...
      So, then, there's really no need to resort to using either fighter jets or bombers, if you're going to resort to doing a nuclear war against other nations with dozens to hundreds of ICBMs...

    • @vegass04
      @vegass04 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kiabtoomlauj6249 Correction. US Carrier strike groups (CSG) aren't composed from 20 or more ships, they are much smaller. An aircraft carrier is supported by one Ticonderoga class cruiser, one or two Arleigh Burke class destroyers, one frigate (formerly that was Oliver Hazard Perry class but now US Navy hasn't got any frigates until the new Constellation class becomes available), one oiler, one support ship and usually one or even 2 of the Los Angeles or Virginia class attack submarines.
      Occasionally one or two ships from our allies joins the CSGs as part of an exercise. But even then CSG doesn't come close to having 10 ships, let alone 20. Although CSG is the main fighting formation for projecting US Navy power across the globe, we don't have enough ships to spare so many of them within the CSG. Our destroyers have many other roles to fill beside providing air defense for the aircraft carriers.. Roles like the ballistic missile defense for example..

    • @Shadowboost
      @Shadowboost ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vegass04 ballistic missile defense is part of what is needed to defend the CSG now. The numbers you stated are a minimum. But yes, it's almost always usually closer to 10 rather than 20

    • @cross6588
      @cross6588 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Are you familiar with how a Patriot battery is deployed and launchers are position?

    • @electricalife
      @electricalife ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You know there is more than one launcher right? Pretty sure they have it covered.

  • @syproful
    @syproful ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I love how it starts steering right out off the tube. It’s stupid agile for such a beast of a missile.

    • @lilMungo
      @lilMungo ปีที่แล้ว

      @James Stocksthat was when iff wasn't a thing lol

  • @phillipbailey8163
    @phillipbailey8163 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These new Launching and Delivery Systems are still Top Secret unfortunately.

  • @danmcha7342
    @danmcha7342 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Most weakness for airdrfence systems is mass coordinated attacks with cheap drones , rockets and mostly drones are becoming hard to heat and detect.

    • @cooldudecs
      @cooldudecs ปีที่แล้ว

      I think this was thought of. … This won’t be used for drones. Custom jdam missiles could potentially be used .

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most drones are hit. But they are cheap (20,000$ for Iranian drones) and so cost effective in comparison to Patriot missiles whcih are expensive. They have had success with the Geppard AA

  • @CM-fp2gz
    @CM-fp2gz ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i love the calming music at the end of explosions and destruction :)

    • @Igotcha06
      @Igotcha06 ปีที่แล้ว

      (Evil laugh)

  • @alf3071
    @alf3071 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    any system that can defeat nuclear missiles is awesome

  • @josephastier7421
    @josephastier7421 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:08 The guy plugging in the power cables looks terrified.

    • @whisper5899
      @whisper5899 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those power cables can easily kill someone if one mistake is made makes sense

  • @ravshan_buronov_usarmedforces
    @ravshan_buronov_usarmedforces ปีที่แล้ว +32

    One of the best air defence system in the world 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💪💪💪💪💪✊✊✊✊✊✊

    • @robertstanley3799
      @robertstanley3799 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Are you kidding me Russia has the best air defense in the world

    • @sweetman5249
      @sweetman5249 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@robertstanley3799 Not True . Russia doesn’t even have accurate guided missiles let alone best air defense systems. Russia is a joke 😆.

    • @robertstanley3799
      @robertstanley3799 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sweetman5249 show me proof Russia doesn't have the best air defense

    • @marv19691
      @marv19691 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @sweetman5249
      @sweetman5249 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marv19691 😝

  • @ginadisbrow9324
    @ginadisbrow9324 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Class is over enemies. Any questions?

    • @aprilvergaraantiworldpower1634
      @aprilvergaraantiworldpower1634 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BlitzWing motto(destroy first, think later)
      Predaking motto(destroy first, ask questions later)
      And my motto is More innocent deaths from wars, peace and remorse later 😆😆😆😆

    • @cchris6094
      @cchris6094 ปีที่แล้ว

      No problem, sir

    • @RotaryPoweredRX
      @RotaryPoweredRX ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aprilvergaraantiworldpower1634 you're not tough

    • @xthanman
      @xthanman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aprilvergaraantiworldpower1634 Next class: Chinese missile defence system.

  • @ASamsung-jh5bx
    @ASamsung-jh5bx ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow Veryvery good

  • @jeanhebert2130
    @jeanhebert2130 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @user-lk1ib3yv5r
    @user-lk1ib3yv5r ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Power U.S. Automatic system

  • @joes5192
    @joes5192 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This weapon is almost 30 years old and still relevant...

    • @-Bigjordan
      @-Bigjordan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lets see how relevant it is in ukraine when 100 1k drones come flying in

    • @Navybrat64
      @Navybrat64 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@-Bigjordan Ukrainians are good at shooting those cheap drones down. Let's see how good Iran is when they get sanctioned again and can't get the parts and technology to make more drones.

    • @lifeenglightment7977
      @lifeenglightment7977 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's all about the up to date software & rada system

  • @user-tq6hq6cr2b
    @user-tq6hq6cr2b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Хорошая, современная система для перехвата ракет 1990 года выпуска и медлительных томагавков ну и кукурузников например

  • @andre4441511
    @andre4441511 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do they deal with decoy system?

    • @cooldudecs
      @cooldudecs ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a very complicated system…

  • @iVaCay01
    @iVaCay01 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It downed the Russian Kinzhall and boy that is really really huge!

    • @user-tf4lk4fm7i
      @user-tf4lk4fm7i ปีที่แล้ว

      No it didn't 😂. It couldn't down Iraqi missiles, it couldn't down Iranian Shahids, and it definitely cannot down a Hypersonic missile.

  • @timf6916
    @timf6916 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I hope it’s as good as they claim.

  • @Semper_Paratus
    @Semper_Paratus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really love it. 🎉🥳👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🤠👊🏽

  • @BobbyChavis-up9mh
    @BobbyChavis-up9mh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its a badass system

  • @thiest1205
    @thiest1205 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sooner Ukraine has this system the better, hopefully they've been training and now combat ready,

    • @thetruth7633
      @thetruth7633 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How many men crew and duration of training?
      A: 90 + 5 months

    • @thiest1205
      @thiest1205 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thetruth7633 I'd say they've been training already, NATO is just letting Putin know what's coming

  • @dray_x
    @dray_x ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This will be a game changer in the Ukraine War

    • @anonypersona3189
      @anonypersona3189 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think Ukraine is receiving just 1 battery, so not much of an impact at first. Perhaps more will be shipped later.

    • @dray_x
      @dray_x ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anonypersona3189 well that one battery has like 8 launchers right and depending on which ammo used it can hold up to 16 missiles. It might just do some damage.

    • @Burebista_82-44B.C
      @Burebista_82-44B.C ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @nektarsolne4niy804
      @nektarsolne4niy804 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anonypersona3189 1 Patriot is enough to protect 1 major area, which is huge. Every bit helps; and if Ukraine receices 1-2 more in the future - it will be even better.

    • @cooldudecs
      @cooldudecs ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nektarsolne4niy804 it literally can detect up to 60 miles. You don’t need 20 of them

  • @ChrisLotter-it8ok
    @ChrisLotter-it8ok 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Pac 3 is a monster

  • @harddgril546
    @harddgril546 ปีที่แล้ว

    My dream patriot misile

  • @charharn7011
    @charharn7011 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It would seem it to be easier and less expensive to create a stealth missile do we feel the patriots could detect and target such a thing?

    • @NikonNotCanon
      @NikonNotCanon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Stealth isn't really a factor when ur talking about these advanced radar systems

    • @Reaper77779
      @Reaper77779 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stealth missile travel at mach 2 will be almost impossible to intercept, even without stealth technology missile that traveling at mach 2 is very very hard to intercept, and some missile can glide at very low altitude to the ground, so hard to detect by radar, even worse there are so many missile guidance system to choose depending on the target, that make even the most advanced warships and valuable things to dangers, by this missile traveling at mach 2 and 3 with so many guidance system to choose.

    • @charharn7011
      @charharn7011 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My point is that creating a missile to be so fast it cannot be intercepted cost a lot to produce. Then when the tech comes out to make them obsolete which it always does your stuck with the bill and garbage. If you can make a cruise missile stealth then you cut the cost considerably for each missile and does not need to be fast just undetectable which gives you first strike capable as well.

  • @OnceABustAlwaysABust
    @OnceABustAlwaysABust ปีที่แล้ว +3

    While surely capable I think it’s way too complicated. The chance for human error is much higher compared to systems that don’t require as much personnel

    • @shade8816
      @shade8816 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, the reason that there was friendly fire incidents was because of that exact same thinking. There were a lot of reasons that it happened, but at the end of the day, it is better to have both computer and humans at the system. Well trained humans who know the system up and down.

  • @untrust2033
    @untrust2033 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:44 ah yes i remember having laptops in the 60s

  • @jasonbourne.hit.1ist
    @jasonbourne.hit.1ist ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx for paying my rent patriot missiles.

  • @lee11991964
    @lee11991964 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    01:39 This drone, I assume, looks very similar to a Klingon Bird of Prey....

  • @enakamendis1210
    @enakamendis1210 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍

  • @jaimeg9700
    @jaimeg9700 ปีที่แล้ว

    the missile on the ground can hould 4 or 5 small arms missiles

  • @fredericklockard3854
    @fredericklockard3854 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ballistic missiles are making a comeback? I never knew they left or were is disfavor.

  • @karlvonbahnhof6594
    @karlvonbahnhof6594 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sláva USA 🇺🇲 for sending this to Ukraine 🇺🇦✌️ from Czech 🇨🇿

  • @33DMason
    @33DMason ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Big game changer for Ukraine.

  • @lightninggaming016
    @lightninggaming016 ปีที่แล้ว

    We went from arrows to missiles to kill each other with

  • @josephdonais4778
    @josephdonais4778 ปีที่แล้ว

    6. The missile carrier.
    You're not going to field that with a single volley.

  • @derry3344ii
    @derry3344ii ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If it wasn't for the USA we would all be toast 🇮🇪🇺🇸

  • @BMF6889
    @BMF6889 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was a Marine infantry platoon commander in Vietnam 1968-69. I had very good training but it still didn't adequately prepare me for combat in Vietnam. There was a lot of on the job training to learn how to fight effectively in the many different environments such as jungles, mountains, rice paddies, pine forests, and elephant grass. I also learned the lesson of the enemy's ability to try to overwhelm you with numbers. While I lost a lot of Marines killed and wounded, we were able to prevail. However, if they had just a few more soldiers, I'm not sure we could have survived a real swarm attack.
    So I worry about today's expensive high value targets ability to defend against swarm air or missile attacks. If a Patriot battery has X number of missiles and the enemy launches X+1 missiles, then the ship or ground targets are destroyed.
    In stead of declaring climate change an immediate threat to out nation, I would hope that a future President will ask congress to provide the funding so the military can address swarm attacks against our strategically important targets. It should be virtually impossible for an enemy to penetrate a carrier strike group's defenses. It should be virtually impossible for an enemy to penetrate our land based missile defenses.
    Such an initiative would be very expensive, but what is the cost of losing an aircraft carrier with 5,000 men and billions of dollars of equipment? And what is the cost of a US city or strategic target being destroyed?
    A battery of Israel's Iron Dome cost about 50 million dollars and each rocket costs somewhere between $40,000 an $100,000 dollars each to shoot down a home made HAMAS rocket that costs perhaps less than $1,000 each. In terms of protecting lives and damage to civilian infrastructure, Israel considers Iron Dome to be cost effective. But Iron Dome is just a first technological step to the development of Iron Beam which is a laser system that Israel claims will cost about $2 dollars per shot to destroy incoming missiles, mortars, artillery, and drones.
    Today, we have about 12 aircraft carriers of which about a third are being modified, a third being readied to deploy, and a third on or ready to deploy. So, on average we have about 4 aircraft carriers either on active deployments or could be on active deployment. In WW II we had 36 aircraft carriers because we were in a world war and we knew we would suffer losses and we wanted the ability to continue to attack despite those losses. We seem to have lost the idea that we will suffer losses in a future war.
    I don't know all of the defensive capabilities of the carrier strike group, but it has been well publicized that they lack an effective wake following torpedo defense. This is a torpedo that instead of targeting the ship itself, it fires a torpedo behind the ship and lets the torpedo follow the wake of the ship and strike it from behind. For God's sake solve that problem and all of the others to protect the carrier strike group from swarm attacks.

    • @AlexS-ty2zo
      @AlexS-ty2zo ปีที่แล้ว

      Q l aq

    • @jonlang2781
      @jonlang2781 ปีที่แล้ว

      1. If the enemy launches X+1 missiles on a particular target , then he shall be capable of attacking only Y-(X +1) of other remaining targets.
      2. You don't compare the cost of the defending missile to the cost of the attacking missile , but to the cost of the likely damage that the attacking missile would cause.

    • @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473
      @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473 ปีที่แล้ว

      Drones have really added a new complication to land battles.

  • @cooldudecs
    @cooldudecs ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s actually old … there is a new system out there . We have a surplus of these

  • @cityofjoy8830
    @cityofjoy8830 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This reminds me of gulf war

  • @joaoyapur1247
    @joaoyapur1247 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    RIP Patriot system

    • @user-ym5bl2vl7c
      @user-ym5bl2vl7c 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      S400 is the best air defense system in Russia(not in the world).🤩🤩🤩👽👽

  • @thebeastofburden8770
    @thebeastofburden8770 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    let this hardware serve in Ukraine, let see if it can walk the walk not simply talk the talk.

    • @billr5842
      @billr5842 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm optimistic lol. Russia is already throwing a tantrum about us sending them. Let's send them over so Russia can no longer bomb hospitals and schools

  • @ejicon3099
    @ejicon3099 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dwight Schrute punches the air in excitement.

  • @mrprodigy7143
    @mrprodigy7143 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As an American I’ll be the first to say patriot wasn’t our best work.

  • @frankcuritana8159
    @frankcuritana8159 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ukraine need this kind of shield to defend themselves from constant attack from Russian missiles

  • @brendonsullivan3354
    @brendonsullivan3354 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stopping the Russian missiles right now 😊

    • @olga7454
      @olga7454 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And just 30 mins ago. Patriot is the best!

  • @ericclausen6772
    @ericclausen6772 ปีที่แล้ว

    Give em anti-ship missile's so a battery can be put on ships like cargo container ships and some military ships to boost the ships defence

  • @Nedroj
    @Nedroj ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this system. Expensive but hellagood

  • @nathanielneveryman
    @nathanielneveryman ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yah but why no assassination space lasers?

  • @heliosmou
    @heliosmou ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We have underestimated Ukraine from start. First, intelligence claimed that Ukraine would fall in 72 hours. Well, that didn’t happen. Now, commentary about the difficulty and time needed to learn how operate the Patriot system. Ukrainians have repeatedly shown adaptability and modifications to weapons they already have to defend their territory. Their strategies are brilliant and effective. It’s not a matter of learning how to operate complex systems. That’s a no- brainer. It’s about getting what they need and when. Just enough to accomplish their mission and preserve freedom from states that relish tyranny, destruction, and oppression. Ukrainians are doing the world a favor - doing what the world has not been able to accomplish despite billions invested for that exact goal - and, as always will continue to surprise and exceed our expectations.

  • @daze4276
    @daze4276 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Stand with Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @tristanrabier8608
      @tristanrabier8608 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love Ukraine from France 🇨🇵❤🇺🇦

    • @sufianshourav
      @sufianshourav 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @tu1469
    @tu1469 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia has a large missile that when it’s targeted mid flight, its computer recognizes an incoming threat and it instantly shoots out 4 more missiles that scatter and continue flying at the initial target.. crazy tech

  • @the_wise863
    @the_wise863 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How the patriot can strike the Df21china explain me

  • @vlmrs395
    @vlmrs395 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So this is what got blown up in Ukraine recently

    • @esportsprodigybuhanil933
      @esportsprodigybuhanil933 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Zero evidence of that.

    • @markospain7230
      @markospain7230 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@esportsprodigybuhanil933 The video testimony of the Ukrainian blogger confirms this.

    • @markospain7230
      @markospain7230 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@esportsprodigybuhanil933 *Despite the fact that in Ukraine, by the way, there is a strict ban on videography*

    • @esportsprodigybuhanil933
      @esportsprodigybuhanil933 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@markospain7230 What is the name of the blogger and where can I find the video testimony?

    • @user-nr3th5lm1y
      @user-nr3th5lm1y ปีที่แล้ว

      @@esportsprodigybuhanil933 These 6 bloggers have already been arrested)) They face imprisonment.