Sony a7SIII vs Sigma fp - Low Light battle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2020
- This video shows low light performance of both Sony a7siii and Sigma fp.
Observation:
Sony a7s3 is the clear winner as it’s more sensitive and clean.
_________________
Checkout Low light battle between Sony a73 and a7s3:
• Sony a7siii (a7s3) vs ...
#a7SIII #sigmafp - บันเทิง
![[4K] TREASURE(트레저) “KING KONG” Band LIVE Concert 킹콩은 라이브를 찢어🦍 [it’s KPOP LIVE 잇츠라이브]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p8bLLOxPDD8/mqdefault.jpg)
I love my Sigma fp ❤️🙏
U have instgrm ?
It still gets me, that people think that somehow a log curve is better than a raw image because you can see what’s there. Don’t you know that log only exists because of the economoy of data management?
What ISO is the Sigma @? 3200 base?
The Sony completely breaks down when pushed. How can you not see that? Footage looks terrible. Whereas the Sigma is clean, but again RAW footage cannot be comparef to baked in footage. The comparison is pears to apples:
The Sony is baked and the Sigma is RAW. Sony, baked apple Pie vs all the ingredients you need, Gee. You need to lift the Sigma darks to see whats there.
Thanks Karuna for the information. I will be doing a comparison of Raw vs RAW and also include the footage at base ISOs for low light tests.
In addition to the RAW vs Compressed problem mentioned before me, you're comparing slog with linear which doesn't match at all, I guess it is why you went with 640 to base it off Sony's slog base ISO. You also completely forgot that Sigma fp has a second native ISO at 3200 meant for lowlight shoots which gives a very clean image (going lower or higher than that for lowlight introduces noise obviously). My advice is to plan your tests before taking them. You can't do it on the spot and then write in the description "the clear winner is a7s3", Keep it up! Looking forward to more stuff.
Hey..Thanks for the pointers and Yes I have been told about both the Raw vs RAW and similar picture profiles comparisons. In the next video I'll keep these things in mind. Learning every day 🙂!
@@ankitsinghfilms great attitude 💪
@@Robinbobin thank you so much.. People have been very kind and been sharing all the knowledge and that I really appreciate 🙂
The Sony is better I speak from experience.
that color banding or something on a7s3 0:25 at only 6400?
Quality of the images from Sigma is amazing, thanks for sharing
🙂🙏
You have to grade slog to linear in order to compare...
Yes similar suggestion I am getting from everyone. I will be doing that soon. Thanks!
The Sigma has a better usable ISO range 100-25K. The Sony gains a edge in the mushy and unusable 32,000 ISO and up range. At 1600… 3200.. 6400… 10,000 and 12,800 the Sigma looks way better. The heavy handed mush making noise reduction that kicks in at 12,800 on the Sony, destroys the image. That’s one of the reasons I got rid of my Sony gear ( FX6 and A7SIII). I’m now shooting Red and Canon. Though, I might once again pick up a Sigma FP. The updates and the optional EVF are making it a more interesting proposition to me. I originally parted with the FP because of the lack of an EVF and the hassle of an external SSD with cords hanging out.
I got a sigma recently. Amazing that e.g. a Samsung 980pro in an icy box chassis (with a icy box cold shoe ssd clamp) - all this is now 8 times cheaper than the equivalent cf express card so 12 bit cinedng with a quick grade using a colour chart via DaVinci resolve and then export to h264 (to work on your iPhone in Adobe rush) will kick Sony’s ass 😂
Can't say it is a true fair comparison, Sony is represented in log, so not a linearized image nor 709 tonemapped. In my opinion you should look at those through aces. I'm pretty sure that sigma has more latitude.
You are right that I should have compared the standard picture profile footage from these camera. But from what I have seen so far Dynamic range is better on Sony a7siii. I compared the raw file as well. Probably will try to post that test comparison as well.
@@ankitsinghfilms that's great ;)
Did you use blackmagic film color profile and gamma? that is a closer match to the slog from the sony
In resolve I chose black magic design in Raw tab to edit the cinema dng and rendered without any other editing. I am yet to try cinema dng editing in premiere.
@@ankitsinghfilms You could pull up the shadows a bit, slog does that too
@@LarsSteenhoff right here I wanted to just show what one would get straight out of camera.
@@ankitsinghfilms But why did you use s-log on the sony? Its not meant to be used straight out of the camera.
You can put both cameras in rec709 and see how they compare, thats a more apple to apple comparison
Even if it says it's a f2.8 at both of then it's an f stop not t stop which means that it's not the same amount of light entering the sensor to begin with
bro, Can you give your insta hadle?
i suppose you are from India, I would like to know where I can find sigmafp accessories?
I noticed that the s35 mode on the sigma is way sharper than the full frame mode in 4K. Did you notice? Could you give a try?
Is it? I was not even touching super 35 mode assuming it wouldn't be as sharp. But thanks for this info ..I will definitely try if that's the case it would give me one more usable focal length.
@@ankitsinghfilms yes, I was surprised myself. Maybe S35 is pixel to pixel, so sharper than 6k downsized to 4K.
@@l2lr quite possible ..I will definitely check it out and ASAP 👍
@@ankitsinghfilms ok let me know your result!
Yes it sharper, but also has more noise. you choose the tradeoff you want per shot
Ideally the same lens should be used when comparing cameras, some lenses have better light transmission. T stops are the only way to compare light, not f stops.
Yeah but that is the limitation as I own only one l mount lens. So I chose the closest focal length.
It looks verry symilar. If put some contrast on Sony, the result will be the same. May be a little bit noisy on sigma but neglijable.
Hello bro I want to know whether to buy sigma Fp because I don't know much about the camera. But I want great image quality and at the same I want a small camera. But I'm not pro.
Hey Vignesh..if you do no rely totally on AutoFocus then sigma fp is a camera with superb image quality that is easy to process and can be color graded with great flexibility.
@@ankitsinghfilms can you tell me is that was easy for a non pro to not rely on the autofocus?
It definitely depends on the use case but being a non pro I find it difficult to manually focus.
@@ankitsinghfilms thanks bro
@@ankitsinghfilms Is the sigma fp better than the BMPCC4k overall? Also can you suggest a few good lenses that are directly compatible with the sigma fp. Are they easy to get or are they rare?
But the lenses are different...
The a7s3 did look as clean as the fp
Log profiles creating more noise in low light situations. Not a fair comparison.
@@sonacphotos yes and no, you actually create more noise, cause you squeeze your dynamic range into rec 709, which has about 6 stops of dynamic range.
no sony sıgma yes
If you can send me a single raw frame of the sigma I will match the sony
Sure ...will share soon!