Neil deGrasse Tyson on Science, Religion and the Universe | Moyers & Company
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2024
- Bill Moyers continues his conversation with the astrophysicist in part two of a three-part series.
Watch part one with Neil deGrasse Tyson: bit.ly/1dvNWcW
Subscribe to 'Moyers & Company' channel: bit.ly/LGjeaM - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
That is the truth.
Tyson love that he doesn't know everything, and that there are problems left to solve. No true scientist dreams of Heaven. A place where every question is answered is our definition of Hell.
Nate Smith What we need is a unifying truth or concept that finally makes us join together as the human team we should be. No more walls, lets build bridges! We need new ways of thinking ourselves and our role in the universe. Lets get serious about this! The best I CAN DO FOR THIS AIM, is to recommend you to read The Present, a short free book that you can find at truthcontest,com. It is a book that carries within that truth or concept i was talking about.
José Perez The moon landing should have been that unifying event. Perhaps we'll get wiped out by an alien race, and learn to love each other while we're dying.
Many events in history could have benn that alarm clock, but they weren´t. I don´t know, may be we were not ready.
I personally think that when most people understand we are one team, we will be able to turn this planet into a paradise. You know, it is the message Lennon gave in Imagine, and that many other artists, writers, thinkers, etc, gave all thorugh history. Read the lyrics of Beethoven´s Ode yo Joy and it is the same. Read the Bible and it is the same. Read Einstein´s thoughts and it is the same.
i could listen to neil talk about the universe for hours
i think we do more than that. he is the future for our children. To bad the world is not made up of more of him... He is a...
Jeff Thurber He is a...? He is a what? HE IS A WHAT? WHAT IS HE!!!??? D:
Jon Cunthole HE IS A STAR (stardust), lol... The world is made up of what is essentially him already.
FPS Gerald Yeah?
I guess lol, not sure, just a thought that came out sounding awful.
13:56 _"Some myths deserve to be broken apart, out of respect for the human intellect"_
Atheism rules
th-cam.com/video/3whq8Y6wcKs/w-d-xo.html
DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT
EXTINCTION IS HERE
ASK FOR THE CATALOGUE OF THE EARTH
SHARE THIS URGENTLY
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED....
everything you do resounds in eternity
wake up
TAKE A WALK.
HARRY MACK SPITS ON THIS HARD...
i laughed and i lost...
كي قول انسان لكاش انسان (يا حمار) تساوي لعنة طول.
قسما برب النازلات الماحقات...........
emotional damage.....
humanity 200000 years....
dinausors 160 000 000 years................
That was cynical
We are here to seek the Divine not fun.....................falun dafa
@@jeffforsythe9514 r u serious? This is why religious people are sooo diluded.
"Not only are we in the universe, the universe is in us. I don't know of any deeper spiritual feeling than what that brings upon me."
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil is just a liar.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Must be true if he said that.
I guess we are all doomed.
its also in ants and chlamydia, dont forget how magical they are.
@@nicholasperri8740 You sneer at Tyson's explanation of things unseen, yet accept the preposterous notion of some nebulous entity who is in charge. The cognitive dissonance involved is disturbing.
@@Acuraintegraman1 Much more magical than your allusion that you ,perhaps, have a better answer. Let me guess....therefore "God".
I like how Bill let him talk without butting in like most interviewers do.
He's a great interviewer ! Very classy.
his agenda is clear, if you watch and listen.
JustKeith cuz manz waz actually interested in what he was saying
He is not the kind of guy that leaves a lot of opportunity to butt in ! He fast And explosively enthusiastic ! I have had a lot of philosophical debates with believers who seemed to think my atheism was a lack of appreciation for the wonders of creation. Which is a bit rich, because all my life I have been enthusiastically finding out all I could about every aspect of reality and being gob smacked very often ! And fully aware that I. Could never live long enough to know anywhere near everything worth knowing about reality! I would say that all adds up to willingly experiencing a sense of awe and humility that some would say is spiritual! Yet I truly am an atheist. What makes believers think that arrogance is integral to atheism ? I think we come in as many varieties as anyone else !
That’s the old(classy), polite way to do an interview that I missing and I love.
"If the only reason why you're saying that is it's a mystery, get ready to have that undone" This is probably the best line I've ever heard.
I think Dr Tyson's best line is, "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you."
@@stephenwright8824 Neil clearly loves to be deceitful about the universe.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
I captured his facial expression at 21:58, turned it into a poster and pray to it nightly.
Hahahaha
He expression at 21:58 tells the truth momentary! 😅
Priceless Moment. LOL
Had me dying laughing
Charly chean
This man is a giant. It is rare for one individual to have such a breath of knowledge available to bring to a discussion at will, let alone the ability to communicate it to others of all levels of education. That broadcast was 9 years ago, It could have been this morning. Timeless.
21:57 -> Neil's face... Priceless!
bitch please- NDT
literally the reason i looked this interview up
Neil's superpower is breaking down all the difficulty and intricacies of physics--the stuff he and the other physicists see and learn and understand--in a manner that the rest of us can begin to conceptualize it's simplicity.
It brings the universe down to earth so to speak. It's amazing
I liked Carl Sagan that was teacher, and I'll tell you in my opinion and even fact Carl Sagan is a pure genius
100%
Neil couldn't even get around basic physics.
The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LoT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.
@@todds7057 Literal genius? Possibly? BUT...Carl Sagan is definitely a GENIUS communicator! He knows how to communicate to laypeople audiences. Unbelievable!
@@todds7057depends who you are and how you receive information. For me Neil Degraas is a total genius. Period.
"I don't care what you think...Think whatever you want"...Priceless
That Cloud analogy was pretty damn amazing.
Growth of a multicelled organism would be another set of analogies.
"Because you live 80 years"
Bill Moyers was 79 at the time of this, lol
that hurt lmao
I hope the guy survived until 80 at least.
Alvaro Goenaga No he died at 79 lmao
@@Haywood_Jablowme he's still alive, he's 85 right now
@@Haywood_Jablowme False. He's still alive ya prick...
Neil deGrass Tyson, what a mind.
What a joke.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Science is not wisdom, the word conscience is the prefix con(with) and the word science, not modern science but true science, wisdom.....................falun dafa.
@@jeffforsythe9514
Stop with that nonsense already. How many comments have you spammed thus far with that chosen copy and paste ignorance?
The tools and processes of science grant the individual with the knowledge and WISDOM to understand the world/universe in which they exist. Directly implying with GREAT accuracy that science is in fact wisdom.
Only uneducated fools think they live on a plate and that lizard alien humans are taking over the planet.
Take note that NEVER in your existence will you ever find ANY educated, intelligent mind believing in such obvious nonsense.
Now, STOP spamming other's comments and try creating your own comment for once. You can copy and paste your nonsense here verbatim and end up with your own comment. Make the appropriate decision.
is it me is Neil just the smartest and most inetresting guy to listen to. he answers every question with articulated descriptions that just opens up my mind.
th-cam.com/video/3whq8Y6wcKs/w-d-xo.html
DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT
EXTINCTION IS HERE
ASK FOR THE CATALOGUE OF THE EARTH
SHARE THIS URGENTLY
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED....
everything you do resounds in eternity
wake up
TAKE A WALK.
HARRY MACK SPITS ON THIS HARD...
i laughed and i lost...
كي قول انسان لكاش انسان (يا حمار) تساوي لعنة طول.
قسما برب النازلات الماحقات...........
emotional damage.....
humanity 200000 years....
dinausors 160 000 000 years................
It's easy to fool the simple. Niel only speak in general terms, he never actually articulates his lies.
@@ironmcolefound the religious ignorant😂
"Why did I feel more satisfied watching the planetarium show than I do watching science fiction?"
Because Neil is a damn good storyteller.
He's a liar.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
@@2fast2block oh. it's you again. Spewing your bullshit again, I see. Stop dirtying youtube comment section please.
and reality can be stranger than fiction.
The devil uses people…
Science is not wisdom..............falun dafa
I could listen to Neil deGrasse Tyson for hours.
A huge thank you to Bill Moyers for hosting and sharing this inspiring and enlightening interview of a most wondrous gentleman.
😇
"Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they're presented with evidence that conflicts with that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore, and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief." - Frantz Fanon
I agree with the quote, Shawn. I find it interesting that, to me, it is obvious that this aversion to cognitive dissonance would cause a species interested in evolving to figure out which one of their basic premises is wrong and become stronger for the growth. Otherwise it almost seems to make intentional stupidity a rational choice
Hmm.. explaining cognitive dissonance as struggling to grok disparate but perhaps true ideas, one of which is beyond our ken, differs from the cognitive dissonance more commonly understood & struggle with, like when someone with ill-intent gaslights their victim, convincing them of a different statement which is Not true.
Having one forcefully work to convince another, that provable or documented facts in their life are different than the other has known for a lifetime, is extremely upsetting. Especially if the other is vulnerable to the one doing it.
@@Chimonger1 Cognitive dissonance is just the name for the discomfort that comes from thoughts and either other thoughts or actions not lining up.
You're right that it can come from gaslighting. Gaslighting is the same thing as the quote, just in the opposite direction-- when someone actually knows something is true, but their manipulator is presenting false information.
What people are doing when they try to fit new scientific discoveries that disprove their religion into their religion is essentially the same thing as when the manipulator succeeds at gaslighting-- when their victim accepts their lies.
@@dandynoble2875 Yes. I think we pretty much said the same thing.
But it sounds like you make lite of Cognitive Dissonance? It can be extremely traumatic. It can literally be "crazy-making"; it can destroy people. It is a weapon of choice, used by politicians, marketers, etc.
It's something society at large, I think, has needed to learn more about for decades.
As for religion...well, was all set up to manipulate and control people from the get-go. Good bad or indifferent, that is what religion has done and been used to do.
Over time, various leaders have done translations that have changes in them, to make the Bible, for instance, fit with and support their leadership agendas.
But make no mistake: the Technocracy movement which has been rampantly building since it was established in about the 1920's, inserted itself into religions, to destabilize what's left of them...making an already historically tenuous situation more unstable.
Science though, MIGHT [once sufficiently advanced] actually help prove some core ideas in religions ["religions" must include ALL of them, ALL kinds of them, over time as well--not just the Abrahamic ones].
@@Chimonger1 I'm sorry if it sounded like I was making light of it. Discomfort is the minimum, though it can and does escalate to trauma.
This was a good interview, the guy really seems to be interested in what Neil has to say.
Bill Moyers is a wonderful human being. He’s well known to PBS watchers.
@@danbev8542 Yes he is ... Moyers is a real class act and he did many many incredible interviews over his career.
He kisses up to loser Tyson.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
@@2fast2block Real science also says that there were no laws of science before the bigbang.
So we dont know what happened before that
That look Dr Tyson gave him at 21:58 is "priceless."
“Really bro”
My hats off to Bill because I know that he is a religious man and yet he is willing to have guests on that don't believe, and proceed to have very open conversations about religion and the belief in a god.
Ancient greeks believed the gods were in Mount Olympus, just because it was unreachable at that time. Eventually, man could get to the top of it, and there was no sign of those gods. Later, christians said that God was over the clouds, because it was unreachable. Eventually, we reached the clouds and saw no sign of God.
Now, religious are putting their God wether in the frontier of the unreachable, or within people... Or wherever He can hide from our sight... That "Runaway God" doesn't appear to be interested in having a relationship with us... Maybe we should let him go away. Just sayin.
Well put. I'm going to have to use this is conversation. Don't worry I'll quote you when I do.
Wait when did the Christians say that Yhwh or Jesus live in the clouds ?
Where does He live then? Where do we have to point our sight to see him?
Rodrigo Garduño
Hey Rodrigo, you never got a reply so I thought that I may help in clearing things up. I in no way intend to start a debate or argument with you where one of says, "Well I think ... " and then the other says, "Well, I think..." because that solves nothing. I merely wish to answer the question to the best of my ability. The bible in Genesis actually starts out saying that God created the heaven and the earth. Singular. At some point in time, however, the heaven separates into at least three heavens (Possibly during the first chapter where it talks about dividing the waters from the waters, it places air in between them. This is the formation of oceans and clouds). John, in the book of Revelation, I believe, says that he was called up into the third heaven. How can this be explained? The first heaven would be our atmosphere, the second would be the universe, and the third would be that spiritual realm where God resides. Now, remember the bible says that God is a spirit and they who worship him worship him in spirit and in truth. (John 4:23, 24) So, to say that God resides physically in clouds, (or in dark energy) is a misunderstanding of Scripture. There have been many who have done so in the past and probably even in the present, but God is a spirit who resides outside of the physical. The bible also speaks about his presence within the physical. The prophet's book Jeremiah chapter 23 and verse 24 says, "Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD." Some would probably take a Pantheist view of this and say that the universe IS God, and then Carl Sagan's remarks at the beginnings of his broadcast would not be such a big deal except for the very credible theories stating that the universe has a definite beginning. Most Christians would say that they are two separate entities because to say that the universe created itself does not seem possible or even very probable. Michio Kaku talks about a multiverse and something creating the "bubbles/universes". So, here is an example of science saying that the universe did not create itself. Of course, this too is just a theory so far. Like I said, I do not intend to argue with you or try and prove you wrong to get some satisfaction out of it. You asked where does He live, and this is just what the Bible has to say on it. Of course, there are many other references that we could look up that would say very similar things. I agree that many Christians have misinterpreted the bible and have held very ... interesting ... thoughts on God and heaven and hell. We often criticize what religious people have said in the past and in the present and we should probably be more critical of their source and try and get a better understanding of it instead. Hope this helped or interested you. It may not have been something that you even cared to know and if not, then I am sorry for wasting your time with this long reply. Have a good day.
Adam Sloan I think what makes religion so susceptible to mockery is that no one in religion ever exercises the humility to just say that they "Do not know." There are an infinite amount of mysteries in a 10 billion+ year old universe, however, 2000 year old books claim to know the absolute truth. There have been thousands of gods in human history, and the one thing they all have in common is their version of the "absolute truth." So the location of your god whether he/she/it is in the clouds, internal, or the guy next door, isn't as pertinent as their egregious lack of knowledge, basic morality and values.
I wish i was Neil Tyson's son could you imagine him explaining the birds and the bees to you??? Freakin' awesome!
Had the most amazing experience with Neil at Family Guy’s Christmas party 6 years ago about an hour in the bar with my wife Kersti and childhood friend Henrik. Humble, kind, funny and absolutely brilliant and did I mention generously
BILL MOYERS: You think there could be another universe?
NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON: I don't see why not. Because back when we thought Earth was alone in the universe, we knew that there were other planets, that the Earth is just a planet, one of many. "Well, the sun is surely special." No, the sun is one of a hundred billion other suns. So, the galaxy, the Milky Way. No, the galaxy is one of hundred billion galaxies. How about the universe?
We have philosophical precedent to suggest that why should nature make anything in ones... Everything else we ever thought was unique or special, well, we found more of them. So philosophically, it's not unsettling to imagine more than one universe.
Another good argument for there being more then one universe:? Remember the doctor/scientist/businessman Dr. Haden, in Sagans' book CONTACT asking Jodi Fosters' character if she wanted to go for a 'ride'? She expressed incredulity that another time travel machine existed. His response? "In any governmental enterprise, why build just one when you can have two for practically the same price".
Yep. There definitely is another universe.
*****
"... build two, twice the price", i hate to be this kind of sf-movie-freak-nazi, i know every single word/dialogue in Contact
***** That has no bearing here, sir. You're assuming that nature is the same as human construction, but I daresay that the former was here well before the other. I am confused about your argumentation here, do you mean to imply that some government payed for the Universe, or are you implying there cannot be more than one because of that line from a book? Either way, your line of thinking is completely irrelevant.
Alan Bean " do you mean to imply that some government payed for the Universe"
It was the STC division of the Magratheans of course.
Alan Bean you are truly a Rube of the FIRST order. I was MOCKING Tyson in his analogy that we as humans think we are (were) the center of the universe and in that light WHY proffered why can there NOT be another universe. I was merely relating the movie's line about a government making TWO for the price of one.
Alan, take two reality pills, take a nap, and call me in the morning. This world is TOO real for you to last much longer in it. In other words…GET A LIFE.
There are so many questions that nobody has answers and probably never will, because we live such a short time on earth. It is so interesting to hear those wonderful minds, like Neil deGrasse Tyson's that frankly I have no words to describe my amazement.
Every question has an answer but most people quit asking way too soon, good things take time............falun dafa
thats where writing things down comes in play xD
I agree with you!
Amazing video, I really respect what Neil Tyson says and totally agree with him. More people should think like this, with logic and open mindedness.
Only losers respect Neil.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
More people should think, period...........................falun dafa
Maybe it's because i'm on an MDMA comedown and i'm really emotional right now, but I'm watching this in pure fucking awe. deGrasse, Sagan, these people that explain the cosmos to us in ways that we can understand are truly treasures of our species.
+WilsonMackle101 Indeed, then you see those who wish to make their studies worth nothing by taking credit and pointing to their religion by interpreting certain verses in their book...its rather sad.
i thought science was boring until i read sagan, then 😍asimov, feynmann, zukov, all i could read, but sagan kicked it off...
th-cam.com/video/3whq8Y6wcKs/w-d-xo.html
DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT
EXTINCTION IS HERE
ASK FOR THE CATALOGUE OF THE EARTH
SHARE THIS URGENTLY
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED....
everything you do resounds in eternity
wake up
TAKE A WALK.
HARRY MACK SPITS ON THIS HARD...
i laughed and i lost...
كي قول انسان لكاش انسان (يا حمار) تساوي لعنة طول.
قسما برب النازلات الماحقات...........
emotional damage.....
humanity 200000 years....
dinausors 160 000 000 years................
He's the kinda teacher whose class we absolutely love!
It would be a waste of time with Neil the loser.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
The power of the brain to see and observe and recognize patterns is amazing
Neil ignores patterns. He'd rather lie about them.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Beautifully orated, yet again, Dr. Tyson. Thank you.
21:58 I BURST INTO LAUGHTER BECAUASE HE FACE IS LIKE " Really?" xD
I love that he makes those couple of points alot.
#1: The Universe, (or Reality, more broadly,) has much more interesting objects and processes than anything us humans can think up or imagine. (Like, an epileptic seizure isn't demon possession.)
#2: The Universe is under absolutely NO obligation to, "make sense," to anyone.
Love this man, I can listen to him for hours
I am doing it right now. Jumping from one clip to the next. This is the 5th.
@@oliverguennewig1894 then enjoy his lying.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
@@2fast2block Please don't annoy me with religious bullshit.
Tyson is both brilliant and wise. A rare combination.
I've never seen a scientist be that cool, the guy is Shakespeare in physics!!
Bill: don't you sometimes feel sad about breaking all these myths apart?
Neil: "if it dies, it dies"
Neil, I had dreams of Studying astronomy, but a professor took the wind out of my sail the first week. His words if any you expect to get behind a telescope and make a good living as astronomy be prepared lots of disappointments, you will need to find someone who has access time to a telescope and getting a placement with established astronomers will be very hard. The pay is very low for a while. That fact that I was married a set of twins and another baby on the way. The job I had paid more than more than I would have attained. You present the facts, the wonders, and the unknowns in a factual way with conviction, fascination and you acknowledge the things that you don't know. I wish I would have had a professor like you in 1964
This is my safe place. Every now and then, when I'm exhausted from dealing with the ongoing and pernicious ignorance in the world, I listen to Neil and read the comments...
The cloud analogy was perfect what a comparison to define the expansion and how we don't notice it, you're not living long enough to notice something like that, just look at a time lapse of clouds, they're alive, oh man I'm so adopting that concept 👌
Neil is a genius but he can speak to about the universe to anyone. The sign of a TRUE genius :)
Neil is a genius AND can speak about the universe to anyone*
Interview starts at th-cam.com/video/xRx6f8lv6qc/w-d-xo.htmlm4s
Very enjoyable conversation. Thank you..
I would love to have my mom and Neil talk in the same room
Hulkhogan503 same
ur mom gay?
Srsly i am High no she is extremely religious
Oh sorry my bad
Hulkhogan503 I'm sure Neil will beat your mom in an argument. No chance any religious person stands a chance against science
He is great explainer of science cause you can feel his passion for science. Many just drone facts, he brings majesty to it.his passion should be in every teacher. Kids would love learning.
Neil hates science.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Very timely Dr. Tyson...very timely. Stephen Toulmin would love this conversation...
I always call Neil DeGrass Tyson, The 'Steve Irwin' of all things scientific.
He has so much enthusiasm for what he teaches. He loves and admires it to his very core, just like the Steve Irwin had.
It is such an enjoyment listening to such people that it helps hugely in the learning process for so many of us.
In the UK, we have also been very lucky to have Prof Brian Cox, who also has the ability to explain things in a manner that people enjoy and learn from when it comes to matters of the 'scientific' world.
Too bad you don't see how clueless he really is. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.
@@2fast2block why is it necessary that "creation had to be done supernaturally?
@@katherinecooper6159 I don't give reading lessons in the comment section. That's on you.
@@2fast2block
Spamming more of another's comment instead of being intellectually able to create your own comment will only ever expose the chosen ignorance of the spammer and never anything more.
Your misunderstanding has failed EVERY time you spammed someone with it.
Performing the same action over and over while expecting different results IS a sign of insanity.
Either take the medication or create YOUR OWN comment. STOP spamming others. Especially with such nonsense as you have essentially copied and pasted all over this comment section.
Delete your account. Actually, that is the decision of the people. Delete your account and simply go away.
Come back after you choose to educate and pay attention in class. Too bad you refuse to see how intentionally ignorant you really are.
@@2fast2block
"reading lessons"?? Really? That is what you believe the person asked for?
No, they including myself want you to explain your non-scientific nonsense. Either explain your chosen ignorance, or STOP SPAMMING OTHER'S COMMENTS WITH YOUR CHOSEN IGNORANCE.
"reading lessons".... fucking HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! AAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Give stand up comedy a shot. Science is simply way too far beyond your grasp for you to attempt to discuss anything scientific.
"God is an ever receding pocket of scientific discovery." Brilliant!
No that was brilliant, look I understand that religion can help and create a good basis for people moving through life, but it can't create a guideline for truth... Truth is how it is and works, and religion is how you deal with it on a personal mental level.. But disregarding facts leads you to a brick wall and places you in a box. Blindly sticking up for that mindset seems unproductive and takes the real mystery out of life... If all we worry about is where we go, won't we miss out on the beauty of the moment?
***** So first you point out what most rational people would consider a beautiful analogy as "ignorance" and then call a stranger "babe"? Oh, the irony.
***** Correct you are. I'm shamefully embarrassed. My apologies.
***** isense sexual tension between you too...
Mizzou Rah oh by the way... Muck Fizzou.. Go KU... Rock Chalk....
Thank dr. You're enlightening the masses. Btw your eye contact is level 10🤩
I fucking love Neil D.T.! My personal hero...
Nathanael Christy even tho he's against role models, he's mine
me3
tell me another joke lol !
my hero's are open wheel race car drivers!
Love this guy he’s so charismatic and intelligent bravo 👏
I like Neil deGrasse Tyson very much. He is quite passionate about his subject matter. He is about to embark on a great journey, presenting himself as the inheritor of the Carl Sagan legacy. In that role I also fear for him.
I fell in love with the COSMOS series. The elegance, the imagery, the story telling, the presentation of deep history or background that was truly Sagan's unique forte. To have experienced it was something of a pinnacle of a human life. The shear breadth of his coverage was astounding. If I were to look for an alternative title to his program it would be "History of the Universe" conclusive volumes 1-13.
Carl brought science into the home and made complex subject matter understandable. And if that were all the program consisted of, I would say that anyone of reasonable talents and abilities could do that. But Carl Sagan brought something else to this presentation. When listening to him you felt that you had a front row seat to absolute knowledge, or, at least a subscription, if when when Carl ever found it out for himself.
Combining the esoteric and nebulous elements of image, music, history, science, and story telling into one focus is, in my mind, a reflection of pure genius. I also know that he did not do this work in a vacuum. He had many talented, committed, and dedicated people at his side in this endeavor as well as of course, ‘Annie’.
I look forward to the new COSMOS programing but I dread that I will be disappointed. After the original COSMOS series had went into the video archive files, many people tried to emulate Carls' style and his intent. None came even close. The list of 13 part series on various subject matter that later played on PBS stations was prolific and proportionally uninspiring. Had I now become a jaundiced viewer? Was I forever ruined as a candidate for education by video? I THINK so.
The graphics on the New COSMOS will undoubtedly be more spectacular. CGI was hardly a fledgling idea when the original COSMOS was produced. Much of the imagery was made up of skilled painting and moving cameras, possibly done on glass. And I KNOW Carl will not be there. Yes, in spirit he will be present and in each passing scene I will be thinking of him. But the element of the original COSMOS, that something that commanded some 600 million people across the globe to watch and embrace this presentation, will not be there.
I can only hope that Neil deGrasse Tyson can bring to the show that something that bound that earlier presentation up into a masterpiece of science presented in prose.
Wisdom outweighs science............................falun dafa
@@jeffforsythe9514
Worthless spammer stalking other's comments simply because you do not have the education nor intellect to discuss anything based in science.
I like people who don't try to sit there and prove Religion OR Science wrong, but try to embrace the essence of both of them...Harmony works best in most situations...when everyone can just get along...
bhoumik4 I know right?
I'm on vacation but here am I listening to this man talk and I'm not missing a thing in fact I'm having a ball!
You then like listening to liars like Neil. How nice.
The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LoT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.
@@2fast2block the only liar here is you trying to claim that energy was created without evidence 🤔 🙄 😒
WOW ! SOOOOOOOO much to Learn !?!?!? I AM SO inspired every time I listen/watch DOC lecture or podcasts !!!!!!!
Neil is awesome! So much wisdom here!
Wisdom is found only through suffering, interested?...............falun dafa
@@jeffforsythe9514
Calling out the imbecilic spaamer who is unable to formulate their own comment or opinion, and therefore can only defecate upon other's comments and opinions.
How do you spell intentionally ignorant again? Oh yea... "jefforsythe", that's how.
I think Neil is brilliant
16:07 - the 'sound of the collapse of the 107 story building'... You're right, there is nothing like it and it is still in my ears...
Great conversation.
Neil is bringing swag into science!!
brilliant man
I am grateful for these two great men who serve to illuminate us all.
Neil loves spreading his lies to other losers.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
@@2fast2block
Congratulations on your newfound copy and paste abilities !
The look on his face when Bill asks Neal, 'Do you think there could be another universe?'
If your in the US and want to rewatch one the COSMOS episodes just go to Fox or click the link below. All past episodes are at that site.
www.cosmosontv.com/watch/183733315515
Thank you!!!
Very Great discussion given by Mr Neil ..I love how he explains the Grandeur and Beauty of our Universe..Its Stupendous and Brilliant..the Frontiers of Science we are discovering every day
Awesome interview.
The last line on the video is just a banger!
Neil is one of my absolute fav's, he's such a natural speaker.
My god? Neil is a genius greatness in reality.✊🏾👍🏾✊🏾
Thanks for this
Great! I liked Bill Moyers since I saw him talking to Joseph Campbell many many years ago. I liked Carl Sagan and I like Neil deGrasse Tyson!
21:59 , that should be a meme..
Now if only my religous friends
KINDLY tried to understand
when I try to explain the religious part
and not pity and bash me for my questions
on some biblical passages and religion itself
Stay strong
I'm slapping them with science for them to wake up , it ain't no use though, you'll be shunned like there was no tomorrow by your so called "FRIENDS"
***** it's unfortunate, but people such as yourself may not be capable of speaking the words of neil degrasse tyson. as an intelligent religious man, you seem like you were scolding them and trying to knock their beliefs, rather than introduce your friends to scientific knowledge.
Get some new friends.
Would you listen to a religious person if he told you religious stuff ?? maybe they are trying to wake you up. and if not whats the use of even trying to wake religious people up. they are doing what you are doing to them. why not accept them for what they believe and just move on doesnt mean you have to believe. now as neil explains if a religious person inponds his beliefs in a science class that is unacceptable. its all respect. troll
Great interview!
Awesome video!
"God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance"-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Misquote
In context: IF YOU put your God as simply a source of mysteries, or "if that's where you're going to put your God in this world", THEN "God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance." However, truly deeply spiritual people are not putting God in boxes, or putting God much of anywhere. They are putting God as more than simply "where science has yet to tread." Neil doesn't need to see dark energy (or was it dark matter?) to perceive something is influencing our existence, and on the flip side, perhaps we don't need to put ourselves in a traditional box of scientific observation to experience a universe beyond this one. Just like there are things we cannot see, there are assuredly senses within us which have only just begun to perceive the spiritual universes. And how do we measure those senses? Perhaps we cannot quantify or standardize or begin to understand beyond the absolute basics. Let's talk again in a few trillion light years.
@@ReizoukoGrande So why do people try to quantify the unquantifiable?They use a meaningless semantic noise-GOD- to talk of things that, even in a few trillion years, most likely will remain forever beyond their ken. That is why I accept the Tao.
@@ReizoukoGrande you are good! This is my position in a nutshell. There is the unsaid that cannot be said. Things that cannot be put to words as words get in the way. Words have a way of becoming sentences which then becomes paragraphs and finallly several 400 page books. And when presented in proper order, explaining away everything under the sun, and low and behold, one misplaced syllable brings in all doubters.
@@ReizoukoGrande St Paul did. And very messy it was, too.
I was formerly religious. However, at around age 11 or so I began to ask questions and seek answers. I am not a genius, but I have an inquisitive mind which has often caused me grief but yet has led to satisfying discoveries. The more I asked these questions, and didn't receive answers, the more I doubted what I had been told. The more I studied science, the more I moved away from religion. Neil, I believe is correct. It is impossible rectify the 2. They are stand alone. Science is science and religion is religion. It was difficult for me to give up the comfort I needed and sometimes found in religion. But in the face of overwhelming facts, I could do nothing else. Neil is not a national treasure, he is a treasure for all humanity. Carl Sagan, one of the contributors to my metamorphosis, would have been proud. Imagine, sitting down with Tyson and Sagan for a couple of hours.
@@gregoryt8792 Couple thoughts. One, I never understood the necessity of having universal partners. Must be some sort of psychological need fulfillment. I am perfectly fine with being the only. Two, we tend to always relate the probability of others in the universe starting from our structural prejudice. Why would others be protein or carbon based? Why would they be anything close to our form and function? Of course, there is no physical law that says our upright, bi-pedal, carbon based, oxygen user form is the only possibility. It would be interesting to compare the protein probability to other possibilities. Until someone shows me proof to the contrary, I will stay with the only. Imagine the folks you would find on a planet with a methane atmosphere, mercury for rivers, and crushing pressure. Now that would be interesting.
@@gregoryt8792 I am sure that Ivan is a bright person but I don't know how mathematics can be use to prove anything historical. The Bible has many things that are historically accurate and many that are myth and fantasy. When a researcher begins with a prejudice, they can find "evidence" that supports their prejudice. And what does a forensic person have to do with it? Has he seen actual artifacts form the Bible. Tested and Carbon dated them? I doubt it. The bible was not written by 4 guys. It was written over a period of hundreds of years by people who had some serious biases. I am 73, scientifically trained and a minor history buff. After all these years and millions of words read, I see nothing in the Bible that could possibly be considered proof except the historical references which are merely an observation of things that occurred. You can believe whatever you want, or need to believe. But because you believe it doesn't make it accurate or even true.
You are misled by Neil deGrasse, atheists by their knowledge of science and by your organized religion which is more on rituals. Neil deGrasse Tyson has not really taught you the real answers to the primary and central existential problem of man about God, life and what lies ahead beyond the grave. These intellectuals deal only on peripheral and collateral issues. They don't go direct to the central point whether there is God or through the Lord Jesus Christ, the universe came into existence and the why's about you and me.. Yes, science has accomplished wonders far surpassing the Egypt's pyramid, Colossus of Rome and Great Wall of China and the amazing pictures taken by Hubble telescope. It tells you about the laws of physics, quantum mechanics but the knowledge you get is shallow, at first very interesting until it fades away, then so what if I know. Is the Lord Jesus Christ real and alive in this modern time? How can one find, meet and sense the Lord Jesus personally? Those under organized religions are taught to assume their prayers were answered even though not, that's why they can not convince the intellectuals like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Richard Dawkins, etc. There are prescribe requirements to find the Lord Jesus just like meeting King Charles III or Price Akihito of Japan. Do you think you can just have audience these majesties according to your terms and times? How much more the more majestic Lord Jesus Christ. Even though you have been sincere, humble and patient in searching the Lord, what about if you're living inconsistent life not in accord with God and your fellows, do you think, the Lord in person appear to you? What about if you're only selective kind and fair? What about if there are times you're rude and you don't apologize for the wrong you've done on other person. What about if you're prayers are monotonous?
Neil always made my day 💙🤍
You love his lying. Wow.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
This beats watching football teams that I don’t care about. I could listen to either as science and philosophy and religion are fascinating as are the discussions between all of them. Very thought provoking extends ones knowledge and mental growth.
Hooray for Doctor Tyson
The Universe Explorer!
He tells us more and morer
Hooray Hooray Hooray!
He put all his reliance
In courage and defiance!
And risked his life for science
Hooray Hooray Hooray!
"If you're going to stay religious at the end of the conversation, God has to be more to you than just where science has yet to tread."
As someone who believes both in the wonder and hope of spirituality and the knowledge and progress that science provides, I loved this quote.
Wonder isn't a belief. Feeling wonder is emotional feeling.
Believing in hope is obviously stupid.
Also spritualism doesn't give hope and wonder and it's in war with science. E.g. Deepak Chopra.
I'm a little curious though. If religion is just a spiritual fulfillment, should we get rid of all the superstitions nonsense, call it a cultural philosophy treat it like any other philosophy? I'm just trying getting a grip on people's perspective...
I think it depends on the type of spirituality or religion we're talking about. If someone brings up the Abrahamic faiths--which are often what's brought up in this debate--then yes, there will be points of conflict between science and the faith in question. However, in faiths like Neo-Paganism, which covers a broad spectrum of nature-based spirituality, there's more wiggle room for people to agree, since Pagans believe in the science of nature but also personify and revere its forces.
I think both science and spirituality have places in human consciousness. It's why I've always found the "science vs. religion" debate so silly. Maybe how and why we're here is a combination of both the mystical and scientific, and so for both sides to say, "My way's the ONLY way!" just strikes me as arrogant, because at this point, neither side has all the answers.
So I'm told, there was indeed a time when science and religion coexisted, and even helped each other out. A few years ago I went to
Sweden, and visited the island of Ven, where 16th century astronomer and alchemist Tycho Brahe once lived. Our tour guide told us that, in
Brahe's day, science was believed to be a gateway to the divine. Rather than seeing science as opposite or even opposed to religion, Brahe and his contemporaries thought, "Well, if God has given us this beautiful, amazing world, science is how we'll figure out the way He put the puzzle pieces together." I totally agree with that.
Sorry for the long post, but I wanted to give your questions a lot of thought.
I agree. Science and faith are not in conflict and don't contradict each other from where I stand. I have faith without religion. Nice to see there are more of us.
@@aaronholiday8170 please, understand that faith doesn't need religion. Religion was made by men, not faith. I am a man of science and of faith. In my eyes, they do not contradict each other.
Beautiful! 👏
Carl Sagan’s quote that was played, “The cosmos is all it is, or ever was, or ever will be.” at 19:44, sounds like it was meant to evoke Wittgenstein’s quote, “The world is everything that is the case. The world is the totality of facts, not of things.” which we know was not meant to exclude god because Wittgenstein said such a being would be outside our understanding, so his other quote, “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.” So would be interesting to discuss how Sagan's quote intersects with Wittgenstein's and the philosophy of it, but might get a bit technical.
▼ *We have to stand up* ▼
_Let's face the truth together_
*READ THE PRESENT*
_AT TRUTHCONTESTCOM_
Thank you so much!
Excellent interview considering his basic knowledge of science and his age he was so switched on eloquently asking questions from the perspective of an ‘average person with some grasp of the universe and it’s laws’
Neil ignores the laws of nature.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Some myths are deserved to be broken apart for the respect of human intellect💯💯💯
Neil is a myth.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
th-cam.com/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/w-d-xo.html
The odds are NOT there.
th-cam.com/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yW9gawzZLsk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ddaqSutt5aw/w-d-xo.html
in my country now is 03.43 im still watching neil de gras for hours (06.00
I wish there were more of these!
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
@@2fast2block why are you even on this video lmao. Neil is smarter than you'll ever be cretin🤣
@@2fast2block And you are 2dumb2exist. Crawl back into your cave.
I use this guys voice to sleep. Hahaha
this man speaks in such a beautiful way
It's called eloquence
I can watch this man all day
Because you waste your time and don't think.
Neil deDumba$$ Tyson asked about the start of the universe and if he believes in God:
Larry King, "Who started all this; do you believe in God?"
Neil, "The proper question should be who or what started it, but I don't know. If I don't know I'm going to say I don't know."
from the beginning of this video: th-cam.com/video/v-qU4F0lNfU/w-d-xo.html
What we KNOW and have NO doubts about...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Neil does not know BASIC science. Not only can't we have creation without God, Neil does not know that we also can't have science without God. The laws of nature can only come from a Lawgiver, God.
Tyson says his dung at about 2:00 in the video below about the eye evolution. It is proven false in the rest of the video. But to shallow people, to hell with details and what the evidence shows. Your agenda is all that matters.
th-cam.com/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/w-d-xo.html
He IS Neil deDumba$$ Tyson.
Thank God for Scientists !
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster! (Parmesan be upon him)
I loved the discussion between Moyers and deGrasse Tyson: dark matter, big bang, and god of the gap.
Great stuff
Watched all of it for maybe the third time
moyers: because god is what holds this universe together"
tyson: is that a question?
21:57
excellent!!!!!
incoming christian vs atheist fights...
***** I think that Neil was so clear that atheists have already won.
G-gamer ur comment started the fight *ding ding* XD
G-gamer And what did they win?.. The Earth is flat, not spinning, and this is all sci-fi.. this is why the moon never spirals into earth... and dont start with orbiting,... what, the moon is too fast for gravity... its BS
Aba Zaba so what are you saying? the earth is flat?
***** yeah man, sea monsters and all that jazz. seems legit
Thank you!!!
EXCELLENT