He explained skin tone. Body size is affected by climate and nutrition, climate can also affect the face (e.g. certain nose/nostril shapes work better in cold climates). There's also genetic 'drift' of isolated groups, and I suspect selective breeding due to each culture's perceptions of beauty.
maswell People think Mongoloids (what Americans call Asians) have epicanthic folds (squinty eyes) to prevent glare from snow, and that they have pedomorphic bodies (smaller limbs in relation to torso) in order to reduce surface area and conserve heat. Smaller facial features likewise reduce surface area and prevents frostbite
schokohase498 I can instantly tell Indians apart from others. That guy is definitely black. No way in fuck he's of Indian origin, unless he's an immigrant.
Bruce Wayne yeah, he looks like an afroamerican, maybe half caucasian. Just a thought, maybe the lighter skinned one in the thumbnail is the asian one and Trace just doesn't know what a european is?
+hoijarvi Lactose intolerance in Native Americans is closer to 74%. In the Igbo and yoruba, it's about 96 and 99% respectively, though this figure is not so much lactose intolerance as it is lactose malabsorption. This means people from these tribes can and do eat diary, but they cannot consume it in large quantities like Northern European's can. It is very different from being intolerant, which means you fall sick after consuming lactose. They don't. You can also think of it as partial intolerance. As a matter of fact, many milk products are now breakfast staples in southern Nigeria, which is where you find the Yoruba and Igbo groups
+hoijarvi As for Skin colour having something to do with eating cereals, I'm not sure there's any consensus about that. www.ted.com/talks/nina_jablonski_breaks_the_illusion_of_skin_color?language=en
+princenbl Thanks. On skin color: I've read it's UV and vitamin D. Grain contains little vitamin D, so thousands of years of high grain diet has made Egyptians much lighter than hunter-gatherers from central Africa; they need to get vitamin D from UV radiation. Eskimos and Lapps have darker skin than Scandinavians, because of diet high in animal protein and the thinner ozone layer close to poles. I'm surprised the speaker did not mention this.
He said he had done research from many places. So I think he had taken notes, but couldn't just memorize it all and had to refer to his notes. Any of us would do the same.
You have to hand it to this guy. He literally just reads off a wikipedia page and gets millions of views. Hardly even bothers to edit the videos. Get them coins!!! lol
I don't know if he got this off wikipedia but he got it from some source(s) which is fine. nobody knows everything, including your doctor. hence all the reference books in lawyer's offices, etc. If he had memorized the material, perhaps he could have looked at the camera more and it would appear that he just "knows" all this stuff. I'm a teacher and i think he did just fine. he spoke clearly, he referred to his notes and he communicated. even presidents have speeches on teleprompters or on paper, and that's just a speech. but, hey, haters gotta hate
@@vinnyfatstacks1644 I think she was speaking of college. You wouldn't know anything about post secondary-education it seems--so you revert to your last successful time in school--3rd grade 😂 *You liberals and your education 😂 #YourDumbAndProud
Kyle Kimberley Exactly! It is interesting how our society has become obsessed with appearance/race, and that phenotype is all we think about with regards to evolution and different groups of people... I came to learn more about why Europeans have fostered addiction to power and colonialism more than others. LOL.
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 voices don't have sexual orientations, and your reply has nothing to do with the comment jedi 620 made. Lactose is a sugar found in milk, which is what the original comment was referring to, where in the video the host refers to it as a protein.
Salman Qasim But it is we are primates and classified as such were not made of dirt and ribs we are better than that, there are no talking snakes or burning bushes as much as you dont like it it does not beat fact! Genetic data and evidence in the fossil record backs it up as well as physical evidence from apes sharing the same behavior and using tools! More evidence is the skeleton and skull of an ape looks almost like that of a humans! The Bonobo stands upright and shares human characteristics and also has sexual positions like humans do including performing fellatio! Human and ape organs are interchange able in donations as well and apes can interperate human sighn languages as a means of communication as well. I can go on but your tiny mind cannot comprehend nor have the capacity to open up and learn more of anything!
One correction. Lactose is a sugar not a protein. Lactose intolerance is not due to a protein like the allergy to peanuts. Instead, those who are lactose intolerant can't digest lactose. Thus the lactose sugar passes to the large intestine where it becomes food for bacteria that give off gas that causes bloating, pain and flatulence.
Lactose intolerance is a conspiracy created by the government to make people fart more, thereby releasing more methane, which poison our minds and allows them to take over the world and spread atheism, thus polluting our wholesome and intellectual Christian minds! Learn more at #LactoseFartConspiracy
Lactose intolerance IS due to a protein. Lactose is a sugar that is broken down to glucose and galactose by the enzyme Lactase in the small intestine. People with Lactose intolerance do not produce the enzyme Lactase. And ezymes are PROTEIN complexes.
Hillary Briss The issue is that D"News" confuses Casein phosphoproteins with Lactose disaccharides. People also often confuse lactose with _lactase_ ...the latter is indeed an enzyme, but the former is still a sugar. Helpful?
He is being facetious, but we were fish and reptiles before we were.. "little squirrel things" according to Naked Science -- Mankind Rising - Where do Humans Come From
That's actually not such a crazy take. There is mounting evidence that proto humans did leave the African continent then return to it only to leave again tens of thousands of years later as homo erectus. Where they met other humans who never did return and at that point had already diverged themselves into several subspecies (neanderthal/denisovan)
@@suzukisixk7 Neanderthals and Denisovans aren't human, but apelike humanoids. They were a separate species altogether, grafted almost with the same amount of chromosomes as we true humans -- designed to corrupt the gene pool, like the Nephlim gene pool. Over time, they were able to fully mixed with true humans.
They probably were carrying milk in sheepskins attached to their camels, the swaying motion of the camel's gate churned the milk into cheese. So you should thank the camels!
A better explanation for the mutation of lactose tolerance, which probably required significant environmental pressure, was the ability to process lactose during famines. This would explain the rather rapid pace in the diffusion of the mutation.
Remember that Europe is very cold and dark during the winter. Milk is a good source of nutrition and vitamins during winter when there's a lack of sunlight and plants can't grow.
That theory has been shelved. Lucy the fossil has been superseded by older fossils found in Europe. That is why the whole world except for black African's have the same mydricondial DNA so he is spouting rubbish.
Aaron Gordon if you're denying that certain groups evolved different characteristics over time, you're just denying evolution. Which makes you no better than a creationist. Throughout human history we had isolating barriers which kept the different groups more or less separated. As a result we now exhibit certain physical differences due to different biological histories.
Since when was the definition of evolution a difference in the genotype only. Google: the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
Brix Keiffer Bataller actually humans were originally all lactose intolerant as most mammals are after sexual maturity but a mutation occured where humans could digest milk after sexual maturity.
Part of the issue with archeological records is that some places preserved artifacts better than others. Tropical environments are very bad for maintaining fossils, whereas deserts are great for preserving
Asjen Mensink correct! Any word ending with ""ose"" is a sweet tasting carbohydrate that our liver turns into "Glucose" which is a fuel for our bodies.
@Enter the future. Not really, unless you are really trying say all foods are made out of carbon dioxide, water and sometimes fixed nitrogen! Because plants fix CO2 and water to make produce sugars that they metabolize into a variety of intermediate metabolites, some incorporating fixed nitrogen (like ammonia and nitrates). Using these to make amino acids, that are used to make proteins. But if you mean proteins are carbohydrates,. no they are not. They are polymers of amino acids and a different class of biomolecules.
@Joihn Ecker mostly right! -ose designates a carbohydrate. Many of the small ones that consist of just a couple of subunits are sweet to varying degrees. But not all of them. And some, like cellulose are huge polymers that are not sweet at all. -ase designates an enzyme, usually acting on a substrate that precedes the -ase. As an aside. A number of dipeptides are extremely sweet. Aspartame is one of them. Curiously, many dextro-amino acids are also very sweet. Unlike the levo amino acids we use in proteins. I've tasted dextro-tryptohan, which is very sweet and tastes pretty good. Unlike levo-tryptohan which is tastes a bit like mothballs smell.
I think of the "Siberian Fox Experiment", where a fur farm wanted to domesticate foxes to be able to handle them easier. They bred the most tame ones. What happened was astounding! The fox's DNA changed as they got tamer and tamer to having spotted coats, curly tails, floppier ears and started to bark and play like dogs! Not only would this explain how changes in wolves transformed them into dogs as they became more domesticated, but could explain the many changes to the human genome. Look it up...fascinating study!
This is called domestication syndrome and humans do in fact have it. Compared to our ancestors our mouths are smaller, we’ve lost certain muscles, our heads are rounder…many other features as well. We did in fact domesticate ourselves
Not that fascinating... we genetically engineered foxes to be more like dogs..... Makes sense. Similar animal. We're forcing the breeding and mating to favor traits which are favorable to us rather than suited to their natural wild environment so their survival depends on carrying traits favored by humans. Makes perfect sense and actually acts as proof of evolution if anything. It's only fascinating if you just learned the theory of evolution two days ago.
@@laurajaneluvsbeauty9596 well yeah. We're not feral. Think about beauty standards. Who are the most successful in terms of sex? Those we consider attractive. Thus those traits are passed on more often. Short women are preffered so those traits survive. Women stay short. Men get taller because tall men are preferred. Darker skin is more successful. Curvy bodies for women are more successful while muscular and Lean body types for men are more successful. Smaller noses are more successful. Large buttocks are proving to be a sticking trend that may translate into traits passed on just like bigger breasts (men developed a love for bigger breasts because it suggests on a primitive level that the women is more fertile and can sufficiently feed lots of children. This isnt 10p% true but men keep picking these traits so after so many generations you started seeing more and more women with bigger breasts and more men who are attracted to them to the point it's most men now) Evolution is all about sex. Nature doesent magically know what features you need to survive. It's the animals who pick features in their mates that end up helping them and their children survive. And these traits that are successful keep getting picked and eventually reinforced. So humans have the potential to guide our evolution In such a way we actually regress. That is highly possible. We can breed ourselves into being a race of short big booty morons with big chests and low brows and thick thighs just because we keep reinforcing beauty standards. OR we could become a race of ditzy statuesque anorexic models not suited for physical labor and combat nor building and agriculture. Experts predict the next species Will be highly influenced by technology to the point they'll have an extra eyelid to filter blue lights and hunched backs and cramped hands.
This is the first time I clicked on this guy's channel and I sincerely can't understand why he has 400k subs. He doesn't do anything at all appart from reading from Wikipedia, which all of you can do. Ew. Another example of TH-cam's selective and demanding crowd.
Tom Chhkuot Everything you say is ok. Maybe you prefer podcast, but TH-cam is the biggest web on earth to watch... videos. Yeah, videos. So... your whole argument is invalid, and this guy still is terribly overrated.
i think its ways to earn money this kind of systematic ideas you can earn money everyone had choice to do they want or like, guessing that not everybody like to read on there own but podcast will do to at least increase there knowledge beyond others interest or field of studies.
Samui Style And that's why I don't have 400k subscribers. But I didn't expect them neither, because I don't work like many others do in their TH-cam channels. This guy doesn't, he's just having a laugh at you, lazy people not even able to read from Wikipedia.
I came here to learn why Asians have shorter eyes than Europeans. I did not get the answer I wanted, but I learnt that a lot of people still couldn't drink milk, so I'm satisfied.
Asians are still short lol, maybe not as much as before but it's the Americans fault for giving them tons of heart-diseases and cancer because of animal products, and them getting taller because of it makes it even worse for the heart, America is a fucking stupid country
Compared to the undeveloped countries like many African countries and the like, Sweden is actually a pretty good place; kind of equal (of course, never a 100% equal because politics are dumb) BUT, compared to Singapore, Denmark, Aussie, Japan or Taiwan...... The politics are dumb like they are in most countries, the schools are so bad and being a gifted child is horrible in Swedish schools because you get anxiety from doing new things due to being perfectionistic as hell, then there's also very poor knowledge in the books we have here and I found that in a high school book they didn't mention Meat as one of the main reasons for colon cancer. The economic lesson spreads the usual lies about the animal products and acts like eggs are healthy, along with them only mentioning that meat is increasing the risk for HEART-ATTACKS, nothing else. Along with them saying that vegetarians have to eat much of beans and such to get protein when in reality you actually do not need that much of beans due to there being protein in all vegetables as it exists naturally in them. In Sweden we have a test called ''Högskoleprovet'' which literally means ''High school test'' You can take it after completing elementary school at the age of around 16 (but possibly 15 or such if you skipped some grades), so. The högskole-provet has a system like this: *2* is the biggest result you can get on the test, *1* is what average person would manage to get at the högskole-prov so that's the normal giftedness of people, and *what is required to be a teacher is the result of 0,2*... That's like being 4 times as stupid as the average person... Yup. Which means people who have an IQ of 65 could possibly become teachers;-; Then we have the hospitals.. there's a crisis with the nurses and employees due to nurses getting low wages, along with the hospitals being chaotic when it comes to labor and births of children. Women have to wait for sometimes hours in places like Stockholm, people get hurt, it's just chaotic. If I became pregnant (which I, as a 13-year-old, would not) I would rather go to another country in order to be assured that I am safe at the hospital than give birth in the worst hospitals, although there are the smaller useless hospitals that rarely give much labour in the middle of some country-place. *What else? Oh, about the politics again, seeing the news of the politics is like watching ''The Kardashians'' Politicians version.* Most politicians do not have much education, and most just go into politics because they failed at being a businessman or the like and have no choice. There's still a bit of sexism among politicians OF COURSE since women apparently suck due to being too smart for men, and then the main point... *THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING NO IMPORTANT LAWS THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT NATURE THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT EQUALITY OR THE SCHOOL OR HOSPITALS THEY RARELY MAKE CHANGES THEY JUST DISCUSS I HATE IT* What else? Well, that's it. Oh, and we have a huge crisis on teachers, which is due to them changing a simple law in the late 80s, they earn very little and again, are usually dumb. My English teacher misspells a lot of words during class although her accent is very mid-Atlantic, my wood-chop/woodcraft-teacher lacks grammar and writes really stupid sentences that look dumb, my economic teacher as mentioned earlier lacks knowledge while I knew a lot more about foods than her, my P.E teacher and 95% of teacher lack empathy at all and seem to not even know that disorders such as OCD, PTSD or extreme perfectionism exists, of course, they don't know about gifted children either.
OH right, America is very bad; they eat very unhealthy food; almost all Americans have a lack of vegetables in their diet, and they are the ones who eat and produce the most red meat in the world and basically the most meat in general, lots of dairy like Scandinavians as well, then there's the unhealthy breakfast and corn starch along with sugar in general. Next, the Republicans; racist, rich, unfair, selfish. Would write more detailed but a bit busy. Democrats: the opposite, but still a bit too conservative for me. Should think more about the climate, and maybe even more on the people which Obama was starting to do, ah.. if only he could be president a longer time than that... Also, so many people voting for Republicans means there are many racists in America, and there sure are. Americans are nationalists typically too, and if a whole nation basically becomes nationalistic it's turning into narcissism, but a narcissism of your country rather than yourself. There's no fat shaming, which causes, even more, people to turn obese. and politics again; A racist, homophobic, sexist, transphobic, discriminating rapist became president. As for politics, the election/voting system is *FREAKING OUTDATED*. It's not democratic at all because the people don't get the vote, it's the electors who do, in the end. One person can have more votes on average; like how Hillary had more votes than Dump, BUT.. electors matter more than the people, of course, and the system makes so much sense... it's more based on how people live than it's democratic. what if the liberal voters are spread across the whole US and not big in several states at all, but the Republicans are pretty heavy in certain areas? That's what decided the recent election, and that is not very democratic. It annoys me to HELL how you can have such an outdated, unlogical system *FOR ELECTING THE NEXT FRICKING PRESIDENT.* It's so unlogical, unprofessional, stupid. Politicians..
RoyalFox Thats why he is so incorrect to blame drinking Milk on our skin colour, its happened over a long time all due to climate, hot climate black skin, cool climate white skin, its part of our DNA & he is talking bs as I passed My BHS on this particular topic!🌎💥
There isn't a place on Earth where most ppl don't drink Milk, we are weaned on it & so is every Mammal esp domestic Cats, but adult Cats shouldn't have Milk as they have problems & can't digest it any better than a Dog, both are meat eaters yet ppl have always assumed Adult Cats drink Milk, they will given the chance as a Dog would & most mammals but how many ppl give Dogs milk with their food? Cats should drink water only with meat not Milk! Man is whatever colour due only to the climate his ancesters lived in up leaving for a different place & climate!💥
but milk itself is protein rich. it just so happens that to get all the proteins you gotta drink the milk -fat, protein and lactose included- and whoever didn't have the lactose-tolerant mutation couldn't, then, have all them fats/proteic nutrition that would come along with it.
You never mentioned that it’s believed that some humans arrived in North and South America, not by land but by boat following a coastal route following the coastal seaweed and kelp forests, fish, seals and sea lions.
I had to stop less than a minute in when you said "evolution forces adaptation". Please research what those terms mean before you make videos like this.
Thomas Baker the fact that your arguing about it kind of shows each of your lack of understanding. Individual mutation does force adaptation. The process of evolution also forces adaptation. The process of adaptation favors those capable of successfully adapting, and Vice Versa. Quite your bitching.
There was no USA back then. And it was also Russian territory before American. Plus the land bridge would have included parts of Canada. So .... North America would be much more accurate.
Seems you didn't mention native Australians. They must've been part of the very earliest of human migration out of Africa. Even before the ones you mentioned in asia with the Laos skull. It's believed they've been on the continent around 60k years
Charred bread with olive oil is better than bacon. Go try. Get actual bread though. Cibatata and baget style bread you can get anywhere for a dollar or a little bit more are best
+Walter Black because of political correctness.... and the dominant social group in the US happens to be in the median scale.. so why bother talking about it if you are not the top.. am i right?
+Walter Black Because your assertions have not been verified by scientific evidence and the studies that have been done do not validate you. The kind of people who use to tout this garbage about the intelligence of the blacks used it to justify slavery of the blacks, now they just do it to denigrate them as it validates their bigoted preconceptions. Racist clowns own this trope, your spin shows who you are.
GreaterThanGodLike race certainly isn't but the work ethic between ethnic groups plays a big factor in calculating once intelligence since.. the majority of "IQ" tests are an amalgamation of accumulated knowledge and exposure to more problem solving, thus you can indirectly conclude that certain races have more advantage.
Aaron Godley I was like you guys for a second then I realized that Europeans and Asians didn't evolve from each other. The title is asking why Europeans and Asians evolved from Africans in different ways to adapt to their new climates, of course he didn't speak as much to the Asian adaptations.
Odin029 I don't think they evolved from Africans as African features are highly dominant. In order for a population to remain Non African, you need a larger Non African population to digest the genetic input from Africa. Hence, the selective breeding between the Africans and Non Africans. The conclusion is there always was a sizable non African population in Asia. This theory is full of holes and what they have traced is simply the African slave trade route. The European slavers exported tribes of African slaves all over Asia. Even then the Asian population has always maintained the selective breeding with Africans to preserve their Non African Appearance. The two Asian races - Indo-Europeans and Sino have different but parallel evolutionary path to their African cousins. All three evolve from the same ancestors at some distant point in time.
Samuel Jones I think all of these changes happened well before the concept of slavery existed. Europeans didn't really start dealing in African slaves until the 16th century ad. I'm not sure how many African Slaves were sent to Asia by the Europeans because in their Asian colonies they tended to use indigenous people for labor.
Odin029 Nope. The African features are too dominant. There is no way pure Africans can produce an Asian. In order for Asians to make Asians in Asia, there had to be a very large Asian population to digest the little African input. Asians are also known to breed selectively with Africans because of their highly dominant African features and that's what keeps Asian population free of African features. This is a major sexual orientation that helped Asians keep themselves Non African. Even in Egypt where the Asians pushed the Africans towards the South, there was selective breeding till date in order to keep their Asian Features. The little DNA that you find outside of Africa doesn't prove that Africans Migrated to Asia or America. Its just what was left of the Slave trade. Before Europeans there were Arab Slave Traders. Negros in India were first brought by the Mughals. The slave trade was so bad that Entire tribes were processed and sent to plantations all over the world. You have been tracing these "ancient" genes and nothing else.
The video was interesting and informative, but had little to do with the title of the video. You look at the name of a video and create expectations, deciding whether or not to watch it. So is naming things accurately too much to ask?
Kgcopper Yeah fuck D-news and this guy that commentated on it. I always fall for the title because it sounds interesting then when I watch it, they talk about something else that is not what the title suggested.
TwiztidMaGiC No I didn't. Did you miss the part where never got around to telling us exactly the difference between how Asians and Europeans evolved? Which is what the video's title would lead one to believe, it being called "Why Europeans and Asians Evolved So Differently".
Kgcopper where does native americans originate from? He's talking about people migrating from Africa to europe and asia and how they evolved differently, but that must have skipped your attention completely?
First off modern humans did not come from East Africa. The oldest site is near Morocco in the northwest. In South Africa another site. Likely the species evolved all over Africa.
+Seta-San which ones??? there is more genetic variety in the african continent between groups than when you compare africans to everyone else! Africans are so different from each other.
I guess because there are many different climates(people in africa are very diverse) in Africa and they were already adapted well enough to survive in there climates
do you listen to yourself? how fucking vague is that. clearly not all urasians can possibly have more in common with all Africans when they, according to you, have less in common with each other... If you're talking about the split between north African(mediterrian) Africans to sub-Saharan Africans I can understand....
***** And you both want a disclaimer that this is theory as to not give young minds the wrong information. He already uses words like "probably" and "maybe". I don't see where the wrong information was explicitly given. Clearly his comment is meant for people to understand it's theory and not believe everything said in this video, so even if "scientific theories" are generally accepted, what's the point of his comment? I just want to know where the video gave wrong information so I can point something out to you two.
***** It isn't though :/ Otherwise theories wouldn't be disproven or replaced by other theories... I even looked it up to make sure I wasn't wrong am making myself look dumb. Theories are there to TRY to EXPLAIN the facts. Even if some theories are reaaaaaaaaally likely to be true, it doesn't make it fact. I think the only special exceptions would be those that we can't prove YET. But again, if we can't prove it we can't really know if it's true or if we're missing something else. Maybe a scientific theory explained so many things but it ended up being wrong once. Then the entire thing is useless. So until we have proof of a scientific theory being 100% correct, we can't say they're fact
Really enjoyed this video.. I do think that as of right now we are reversing this differences. We got to a point where humans migrate more and more to the other side of the world, have families with different background partners. So I guess it would be safe to say that we have been getting more different by the century and now we will be getting more equal. Exciting stuff
Very educational I always wondered why skin color changed and I assume facial features became unique to different areas was because of closer breeding . Genes can be complicated
+The Bunny Suit Killer there's a difference between taking away people's right to hate on a national scale and refusing to provide a platform to hate on a TH-cam vidio scale. Just face it, having one on such an inflammatory subject as, Anything to do with race, only attracts people like you.
Yes - it is LactAse that is a protein - specifically a small intestine enzyme - that is responsible for catalyzing the breakdown of lactOse, which is a sugar, into the sugars galactose and glucose.
U didn't cover why Asians evolved the Asian eye. Or why it evolved that way. I read it helped protect the eyes from sunnier or snowy regions in northern Asia but it doesn't make sense to me. I still have to squint when it's really sunny out! It's not like Asia gets significantly more sunlight than Europe...
biohazard737 Most programs on the topic I've seen suggest it was more sexual selection rather than natural selection. In other words, it was a desired trait to an ancient culture at some point and people with that feature eventually became dominant. It's much the same way dog breeders will breed dogs for specific traits they want to see passed down. It has little to do with the region or climate.
Speaking as a Nigerian, and as a member of the Yoruba ethnic group who also constantly interacts with members of the Igbo ethnic group, I boldly say, that fact - "90% of the Yoruba and Igbo tribes cannot digest milk" - is completely wrong. I have literally only met two people in my lifetime who are lactose intolerant. Oddly enough I learnt that that was even possible from watching American movies. Please my Yoruba and Igbo brethren out there feel free to concur.
Lactose intolerance is literally on a spectrum. Your body can produce more or less of the enzymes to break down the lactose sugar. Also some people have a hard time digesting the casine protein in milk, but this is misdiagnosed as lactose intolerance.
I am of Native American and everyone in my family is lactose intolerant. We have all been diagnosed, but my mother didn't know what she felt wasn't normal because we are all on different levels (ie my mom can drink a decent amount of milk and she just gets bloated and uncomfortable, my sister can drink a single glass and be fine, but I cannot consume any dairy without feeling sick.) Intolerance has different levels, nobody is the same.
I'm a black American who is married to a white American and she's lactose intolerant. She gets the bubble guts from drinking milk whereas I consume it by the gallons. All of my cousins did as well. I've heard of entire African tribes consuming strictly milk as a way to gain weight fast, as part of their tribal tradition. Something done by the men. Whichever men has the most weight at the end of the 6 month milk diet becomes the tribal leader or some shit. Are you familiar with this African tradition? This video is just racist propaganda with so many holes in it that I feel like eating swiss cheese. Cheese anyone? Well according to this I can't eat cheese cause i'm suppose to be lactose intolerant. Cheese one of my favorite foods!
I have never believed the out of Africa theory. We all evolved seperately. Asians, Africans and Europeans did not come from the same place. Finding artifacts is harder in Europe and Asia because of the seasonal changes which cause a lot of errosion. The artifacts are easier to preserve in dry places and Europe is smaler, so ciries were build and exoanded upon cities.Europeans and Asians have developped so many different tools, Innovations, architekture, food.. .So different from the central Africa humans. We do not even digest the same. Its rediculous to think we all came from one ancestor.
It’s impossible for us to have all evolved separately because populations evolve together. If we didn’t come from the same place we wouldn’t be the same species or able to breed. It’s the same concept as having family, you can’t have biological family without a shared ancestor. Africans have also developed many different things including food and architecture. Comparing everyone’s dna we find that all humans are 99.9% identical.
@@TmanRock9 we share 98% DNA with primates as well, this only proves we had a common ancestor at some point. I am talking about the evolution of the human species and cultures. Just because we found bones in Africa it means nothing. Because tausends of years cause a lot of change. Dog breeds can be mixed as well, humans bred them in different parts of the world and they all evolved seperately, with different traits, characters and so on. They did not all evolved from the same wolf, but from the wolf as a species, but the wolf was not native to only one area, not was there one wolf family. We all came from the homo sapiens ancestor but, the homo sapiens did not live only in Africa. He lived in Asia, Europe and so on. Those grops evolved seperately and according to the environment they chose.
@@andreabrava6899 yeas and if we share a common ancestor then that means we must all share an origin point. Modern humans are 99.9% identical meaning all humanities last common ancestor was in the last couple hundred thousand years or so tops, and it can be traced back into Africa. Finding the oldest Homo sapiens remains in Africa exclusively means a lot. Well sure once humans migrated out of Africa they evolved down separate paths, but we are all still the same species the out of Africa theory simply claims that humans originated in Africa and later left not that there wasn’t any evolution that occurred after divergence. All dogs do share a common ancestor mean the same individual ancestor. At one point I time yes Homo sapiens only lived in Africa. Homo sapiens have been in africa for at least 230,000 years before anyone was in Eurasia or the Americas. They only evolved separately after they split from the original population in Africa.
I instantly came down here after I saw him pause and stare at his computer while clicking to the next page of his notes. This video is so poorly made no pictures or anything just some guy talking oddly.
It's like even he is not sure of what he is saying and just relying on the laptop. Ugh so cringey when he makes eye contact to the screen of the computer.
true that, it is better than alcohol and other drugs. Also with no "hangover" and none of the negative consequences and side effect. I think I will make learning and understanding my "drug of choice" from this point on.
They have different features because of the environment that they settled in. Different environment leads to different stresses on the body, which leads to different adaptations, and eventually different features. I thought he was quite clear.
When he says people couldn't eat a certain food so "they died" is misleading. It would be more accurate to say that people who couldn't eat a certain food died off. Those with disadvanged traits fade away becuase they aren't able to breed as effectively as others who have more advantageous ones.
And those who were too lazy to adapt to the changing climate and didn't make effective tools for survival etc. th-cam.com/video/eeGyDDfoYKQ/w-d-xo.html
It would be more accurate to say people that ate a certain food like cereal could pass on their Gene's more successfully. Proteins from cattle, cereals produce big and strong people that also have great immune systems that increases their survival. But it's more complicated than food intolerance. For example a group might be able to tolerate cereal grain but if they dont have the technology to produce or access to grain makes them more susceptible to famine. Grain can be stored about 6 months dry or a year frozen.
Absorption needs to be taken into consideration also... even today, certain minorities are "here" now, and living among us... and because of mixed breeding those that may not exist in "pure" form several thousand years from now will still be here, their DNA will survive because of interbreeding... Neanderthals did not disappear, they are here today, just as those europeans that existed before breeding with Neanderthals are here today... mixed with the Neanderthals... Also, dinosaurs, it has been proven, are still among us, as birds... they did not "die out," they adapted and evolved... so keep this in mind when discussing certain groups "dying out" etc.
I'm a lot of genetics. I love finding out new things about myself and where I came from. I find literally every culture and everything interesting in some way. This was an awesome video... Thanks! ✔
So glad I read the comments first. The way this video was phrased and it's cover art made me question if it was a reliable source or not. And this is why I usually only watch video from pbs or a university
+Эдуард Вятчанин What use would a hyena have to run for literally over 20 miles straight without slowing down. i bet they are capable but seriously running that long requires so much energy that for anything but a human who can have access to plenty of food it would be inefficient for any other animal and they simple wouldn't waste that much energy for no reason or even if it was for food. walking/trotting for over 20 miles? yea many animals do that. running? no.
Brave Cat if u pay attention to your biology class at school, u would know that hyenas' top speed is not as impressive as other big cats' like cheetahs and lions. instead of sprinting to chase down their prey, hyenas run a marathon to exhaust their prey, which often lasts for more than 20 miles. just so you know
+Эдуард Вятчанин You are correct (said a biology major and teacher). Moreover, humans are the best runners on the entire planet for the same reason. You mentioned cheetahs, did you know when cheetahs reach a certain body temperature, they just stop moving? At all. You can kick a lion in the chin, in a hot noon in the Savannah, and the lion will not budge. Many animals can run faster than humans, but we run more, thanks to the absurd amount of sudoriparous glands. One human have more capability of homeostasis (maintain the same amount of temperature, for example) than an entire herd of horses. We can chase anything, that's what put us in the apex of the food chain, we were born to run.
Marc Abelha is it just me or i thought some guys at nat geo busted the myth about cheetah overheating? though i cant really remember the details, i can recall that one of the dudes say that cheetahs' body temperature only rises after a succesful hunt, not during the sprint
You do realize in 1000 years they'll still have so many good quality photos and videos of us, the people in the future will probably be creeped out by as, since over 1000 years we'd probably look a little different
you do realize there could have been flying cars already and advanced technology such as the so called uknown civilization of "Atlantis", and that in the passing of time all the digital means would have withered and turned to dust? take the pyramids for example , not digitalised = survived through millenials ,unless we find a new solution take the biblical disasters, or major natural disasters that destroyed and extincted civilizations and species , who knows , we could have been on the 20th RESET of the world
You Tube, I disagree with this, not all people looked the same, many many years ago, there were people with different characteristics, height, shape etc (in turkey there is a tribe that still walks on all four) don't take things for granted, so some people looked the same and some other did not. Peace ✌
Treat others how you want to be treated you know evolution isn't about the origin of the first life, ift's about the adaptation of life to it's environment over time due to "survival of the fitest" and descent with inherited characteristics. This is something that is observable in the present world and for which there is a lot of experimental evidence.
@Sol Cutta Okay. But... In which parts of this do you think he is monotonous and droning? And what does joining a political party have to do with being a bad narrator?
a shame. the reactive stupid people who scream racism are the problem. they keep discussion of an actual thing taboo, subjecting everyone to the consequences of ignorance of true understanding and discussion of race.
That was absolutely fascinating! About a half the way through I realized he was talking about lactose intolerance. I guess I more or less thought of it as a disease, so it was very enlightening to find out it's part of evolution. And I'll need to find that squirrel video. We started out as squirrel-like creatures! I bet we were so cute! Our building has a whole collection of bird feeders outside the windows in the dining room. So the local birds and squirrels are well-fed. And apparently they have a fair amount of leisure time. Yesterday morning there was a red squirrel in the tree, just sitting and watching traffic for about 45min. A daydreaming squirrel! How sweet!😉
The problem with 'race exists' is it leads to racism and nonsense like 'Africans are a different species'. We are all Africans. We all evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago from a number of around 10,500. Which means, we are all related. We are not only all one species, but in many ways, we are all one 'race' (in fact, many scientists don't even use the term 'race' because it's so useless). Then we went to India and China and became Germanic people later in the North/West, and others, and later became Angles-Saxons, Celts, Romans, etc. in Great Britain (skipped a lot of history, just focusing on England/America now). So, everybody in England and America is really just a Germanic person or Dutch/Roman/Greek in some cases, in a way. The first people to be called 'English' were the Angles, a Germanic tribe from the East. And almost all Americans are English or Germanic (Dutch, etc.). Unless they are Mexican, Spanish, African, Native, etc. so, there's not even such a thing as a 'white American' or 'an English person'. Most of us are just from Germanic Europe. For sure, there's no such thing as a 'white American' because 'American' means everybody from the Americas, not the US, and you're only about 300 years old, so, you're simply not old enough to be a 'white American', you're just a Dutch or English person. Your mother and father could be American, but that doesn't really make you American in any meaningful way. This explains why it's one of the few places where if you're born there, it makes you 'American' or is able to. If you're born on French land, that doesn't magically make you French. We only have to go back to your grandparents or great-grandparents and you're not American (and your DNA would show clearly that you're mostly Euporean/British). Thus some have called American nationalism 'hubris at its finest'. It's really hated by everybody other than Americans. I suppose it's like being born in the North of England vs the South of England. It doesn't make much sense to try and act as if you're a completely different Englishman having been born in one or the other. There's no real difference other than dialect. But, I suppose, the Americans have this system because otherwise, they would need to call themselves 'US Europeans' or 'British-Germanic Americans', some people have suggested the term 'USer' instead of 'American', but my problem isn't with the term 'American' itself, more the fact they think it means something and my problem with American nationalism. In fact, it's so strange it creates more an American supremacy, 'rawr, my parents were born here, therefore, I'm a real American [white] and better than you'. No wonder America pretty much invented white supremacy. And all modern humans (every human alive today and there are no other humanoids left, either) is part of the same species. A species is defined as that which you can create offspring with. So, the Neanderthals were, in fact, humans. And even you didn't know that Africans are the same species, they have to be, anyway, because Africans can create offspring with both Asians and Europeans (any other human, for that matter).
Thank you for not doing your research Warhammer Workshop because Asians and Europeans originate in Asia, not Africa as previously believed. There have been studies on this and you can easily find them unless you're scared of becoming "racist" which by the way is biological in humans. Humans should and are racist by default.
I think it has a lot to do with breeding with other hominids. Europe had white Neanderthals, Asia had short Floresiensis, Africa and Asia had Erectus, Africa had Heidelbergensis. Could be that many if not most of our differences in height, facial features, and skin color are due to having mixed with these hominids.
I'm sure some mixing may have done that to an extent. How much, we don't know. For example, pale skin is not necessarily the result of neanderthal genetics. The neanderthals themselves are the descendants of a hominid migration out of Africa. It's likely that we already possessed whatever genes are required for light skin.
I believe it to be a combination of all the factors, the interbreeding, the different climates and diets, all of it plays a role in why everyone is so different, just as it does with all other species of animals.
Everyone who isn’t sub-saharan has neanderthal in them. It has always been said that neanderthals were smarter and the world’s average IQ charts don’t seem to say otherwise...
Why did humans evolve different physical characteristics? For example, if aliens landed on Earth and saw a Swede and an Australian Aborigine standing together, they would assume they`re a different species.
Why do they never allow for the possibility of boats any time before the sumarians. It's just silly to think that people capable of inventing farming couldn't build a bit. Ridiculous!!!
Lisa Adler You are totally right. After Pangea and all the continents was seperated long before humans was born, how come all humans had fire, simular weapons ( knife, axe, spear, bow and arrow etc) and also began to build strange, big monuments such as pyramids more or less at the same time, if they was totally seperated by oceans? Clearly they must have had some kind of connections? So boats and traveling via the sea is the only logical explanation? Isn't it?
It is not about Europeans and Asians. It is about groups such as Aryan: Afghan, Indian, Caucasian, Slav, Germanics, Latins; Semites: Arabs, Ethiopians, Jews, Maltese, Somalis; Turkic: Kazakh, Turks, Uyghurs, Turkmen, Uzbeks; Uralic: Magyars, Estonians, Finns; No one should base it on modern culture separating Africans, Asians, Europeans, Amerindians...
Sir George Severn From the way I understand it, we have a couple of main categories; such as Caucasians, Africans etc; with sub-categories beneath those. And it is valid to refer to people both as their respective main or sub category.
***** Those minor differences are actually quite significant, and should not be underestimated. All it takes is a small change for you to potentially be born with brain damage or some other debilitating disease.
***** "Both are actually pretty stupid if you step back and look at it objectively" "the point I'm really trying to drive home is that we shouldn't treat people differently based on minute differences like skull shape." That's as subjective as you can get, so don't talk about seeing things objectively when the first thing you do is to insert your feelings, emotions and moral into a subject. What we get from your comment is: "For me, those differences are insignificant, because we shouldn't threat people differently, and you're stupid (you said, it look at it)"
I was only arguing about the way you dealt with the issue. Anyway, you should not ask me that when 0.01% of anything had been significant, because the answer is yes, in many things, and no, in many other things. And when you see that the difference with a chimp (according to some research less to others) is 1% and with a Denisovan is much less, then... But, I'm sure that if neanderthals and other human species were alive today (or if they were resurrected somehow) many "anthropology and sociology" students would be saying the same thing. Because how much difference is difference enough to accept that there are differences? I don't claim to know for sure about this, but for sure, it isn't professional this PC way of dealing with this subjects. It isn't objective/scientific at all.
***** Look, I followed this thing since the 80's. Not academically, just reading scientific stuff I stumbled with this, again and again. And read many times (since then) about how scientists refused to even talk about race for fear of being called racist or of some outraged clown try to destroy his career just because not liking the stuff. And I still reading about that today. And you know since when things are like this? since the late 40's, because of nazis, offended people "banned race". Suddenly someone/some people decided that race means another thing and it's bad. And therefore we are not separated by races anymore. Or ethnics (depending how PC is the one who opine). It's been like that since then (and a 40's decision doesn't look lie "modern science"...). Then someone came with the absolute batshit crazy stuff of "social constructions". And now with more precise studies and deeper knowledge they are leaning towards race again, that's the last (sorry I can't find now the publications, are not easy to find but I read 3 from last year and 2 from this one) "trend", and that's modern science... But anyway there is still debate among scientists about this subject so, no one can claim that "modern science" is in his/her opinion's side. When there's concesus then yes. And the great problem with PC people is that they are so prone to silence opposing or different ideas... Searching I just found this, it seems to be interesting kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/why-both-sides-are-wrong-in-the-race-debate/ Sorry for my english, I hope it wasn't too difficult to read.
I can film myself reading wikipedia too.
@Miguelle Landry is a perfect 10 Sorry, I missed the part where anyone cares.
👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌
then do it
+1
lmao so true. This whole setup is trash
He didn't explain why Asians look different to Europeans.
He explained skin tone. Body size is affected by climate and nutrition, climate can also affect the face (e.g. certain nose/nostril shapes work better in cold climates). There's also genetic 'drift' of isolated groups, and I suspect selective breeding due to each culture's perceptions of beauty.
gammarayburst He explained why white people are paler than black people. Why are Asians half way 'between?
Smaller bowls of cereal.
racist
He didn't explain why the same hybrids (H.s.s. x H.s.n.) look so different.
Lactose is a sugar not a protein
Correct!
May God bless you!
Also hunter-gatherers were before nomads not the other way around.
@@Muhammad-sx7wr Hunter gatherers are also nomads.
@@abubaseet
You are right. However generally I presume they usually are referring to pastoralists. انا بسيط و احب البسطاء
I was gonna watch this because I'm curious why different types of people have different features, but I think the comments saved me lol.
My genes mixed with yours would make the perfect human.
@@amcclaur80012 he looks actually like a trans dude ....cringeeee😬
@@Mat-zt4bi and? What's wrong with being trans? She still seems beautiful
@@pallaciccione7885 he* and...no
@@Mat-zt4bi okkk Mr. I feel special disregarding other
Anyone else come looking for a theory on why East Asians and Europeans have such different facial features and leave disappointed?
maswell That's probably just genetic drift. I doubt it's adaptive in any way.
maswell People think Mongoloids (what Americans call Asians) have epicanthic folds (squinty eyes) to prevent glare from snow, and that they have pedomorphic bodies (smaller limbs in relation to torso) in order to reduce surface area and conserve heat. Smaller facial features likewise reduce surface area and prevents frostbite
maswell That was an expectation of yours, not something promised in the title.
maswell not before voting down.
Conrad Crane Better compared to what?
I love how the titel says europeans and asians but they show caucasian and black .well done good job
Glossy Bubble quite a bit...he's trying to explain y they evolved differently
@Devin Harp actually cacuasian people are georgians, armenians, azerbaijanis, turks and iranians.
@Realistic Views the same species**
@@someone-3065 lmao. That's not true
Were is Noach is this story?
The thumbnail pic shows a black guy, not asian
That's the point
He could be Indian
Squipy he is from Pakistan
schokohase498 I can instantly tell Indians apart from others. That guy is definitely black. No way in fuck he's of Indian origin, unless he's an immigrant.
Bruce Wayne yeah, he looks like an afroamerican, maybe half caucasian. Just a thought, maybe the lighter skinned one in the thumbnail is the asian one and Trace just doesn't know what a european is?
He lost me when he said "female cows." Please, show me a male cow.
Male bull
Male bull
He is a pleb.
😂🤣
A Cow in the Mail
Speaking as a biologist, this video has enough errors to make it dreadfully misleading
+princenbl Yeah, it was pretty cringe worthy...
+princenbl As a power engineer by education and software person byt trade, I can't spot the errors. Maybe you could please elaborate?
+hoijarvi Lactose intolerance in Native Americans is closer to 74%. In the Igbo and yoruba, it's about 96 and 99% respectively, though this figure is not so much lactose intolerance as it is lactose malabsorption. This means people from these tribes can and do eat diary, but they cannot consume it in large quantities like Northern European's can. It is very different from being intolerant, which means you fall sick after consuming lactose. They don't. You can also think of it as partial intolerance. As a matter of fact, many milk products are now breakfast staples in southern Nigeria, which is where you find the Yoruba and Igbo groups
+hoijarvi As for Skin colour having something to do with eating cereals, I'm not sure there's any consensus about that. www.ted.com/talks/nina_jablonski_breaks_the_illusion_of_skin_color?language=en
+princenbl Thanks. On skin color: I've read it's UV and vitamin D. Grain contains little vitamin D, so thousands of years of high grain diet has made Egyptians much lighter than hunter-gatherers from central Africa; they need to get vitamin D from UV radiation. Eskimos and Lapps have darker skin than Scandinavians, because of diet high in animal protein and the thinner ozone layer close to poles. I'm surprised the speaker did not mention this.
Should be called "Man reads Wikipedia page to camera"
lol
lol
Lmao
Lol lmao
He said he had done research from many places. So I think he had taken notes, but couldn't just memorize it all and had to refer to his notes. Any of us would do the same.
You have to hand it to this guy. He literally just reads off a wikipedia page and gets millions of views. Hardly even bothers to edit the videos. Get them coins!!! lol
youtubeuser LMAO
Life goals
he does but then he has a gift of speaking so we want to losten
lol He has a gift of reading off that screen. Another day another dollar.
I don't know if he got this off wikipedia but he got it from some source(s) which is fine. nobody knows everything, including your doctor. hence all the reference books in lawyer's offices, etc. If he had memorized the material, perhaps he could have looked at the camera more and it would appear that he just "knows" all this stuff.
I'm a teacher and i think he did just fine. he spoke clearly, he referred to his notes and he communicated. even presidents have speeches on teleprompters or on paper, and that's just a speech. but, hey, haters gotta hate
Guy's got stones for leaving the comments ON, this is brutal. LMAO
does it drive up traffic having more comments?
Haha for real. He's being eviscerated 🤣
He's doing the right thing, if pl read the comments they won't get misinformed as much
title: Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently
thumbnail: a white and black person looking at each other
Aili Yu lmao
Aili Yu silly, yes.
Aili Yu hahahha
Aili Yu *black and white
Orppranator
Uh oh, somebody called the language police.
"Lactose is the sugar component of milk" - not protein.
your right my 1st quarter of bio1 tells me your correct because most sugars end in "ose" while enzymes(protein) end in "ase"
@@vinnyfatstacks1644 I think she was speaking of college. You wouldn't know anything about post secondary-education it seems--so you revert to your last successful time in school--3rd grade 😂
*You liberals and your education 😂 #YourDumbAndProud
"the title is misleading" ..except, it isn't. He explains how and why we evolved differently, not why we have such distinct phenotypes.
Kyle Kimberley Exactly! It is interesting how our society has become obsessed with appearance/race, and that phenotype is all we think about with regards to evolution and different groups of people... I came to learn more about why Europeans have fostered addiction to power and colonialism more than others. LOL.
It's the same thing.
@@exittheloop2445 racist
I don't care what anyone says. NIGGAS RULE.
@@exittheloop2445 Degenerate
wait why is everyone in the comments section pissed off
Welcome to TH-cam comments!
They are many overly sensitive people in this world...
Blame it on Darwin!
Because they don't like a guy just reading and would prefer to see pictures and stuff. Lol
Because he said Neanderthals fucked Europeans..........
The comment section is more interesting than the video
Yea in majority of the videos it is.
Your comment just made this very true.
There are lots of strange folks out there!
milk dose a bowel movement good
Yep
I love this guy and all these videos are awesome...but he said "the *protein* lactose..." 😥and it keeps waking me up from my sleep
His voice is pretty gay >_
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 voices don't have sexual orientations, and your reply has nothing to do with the comment jedi 620 made. Lactose is a sugar found in milk, which is what the original comment was referring to, where in the video the host refers to it as a protein.
Milk has protein! Wtf
“Modern humans moved out of Africa”
What, Africans aren’t modern humans?
No, they are the unmixed human. The oldest genetically, not a bad thing honestly.
Correct South Africans were not moderen humans by culture or taxonomy
@@bnoyb4621yes it is lol look at how their society was before whites got their they were hunter gatherers
@kaosisback8376 don't u think it would've been vest if white people just left them alone?
after hundred thousands of years i believe i'm evolving to a couch potato.
haha
lol
were all primates like or not biology does not lie and religion is full of shit
+Aspie Otaku I don't like it, and it's not true my dear.
Salman Qasim But it is we are primates and classified as such were not made of dirt and ribs we are better than that, there are no talking snakes or burning bushes as much as you dont like it it does not beat fact! Genetic data and evidence in the fossil record backs it up as well as physical evidence from apes sharing the same behavior and using tools! More evidence is the skeleton and skull of an ape looks almost like that of a humans! The Bonobo stands upright and shares human characteristics and also has sexual positions like humans do including performing fellatio! Human and ape organs are interchange able in donations as well and apes can interperate human sighn languages as a means of communication as well. I can go on but your tiny mind cannot comprehend nor have the capacity to open up and learn more of anything!
One correction. Lactose is a sugar not a protein. Lactose intolerance is not due to a protein like the allergy to peanuts. Instead, those who are lactose intolerant can't digest lactose. Thus the lactose sugar passes to the large intestine where it becomes food for bacteria that give off gas that causes bloating, pain and flatulence.
I was just thinking that. Glad someone mentioned it.
Thank you for pointing that out! Just one error of many, :-/ many in this vid...
Lactose intolerance is a conspiracy created by the government to make people fart more, thereby releasing more methane, which poison our minds and allows them to take over the world and spread atheism, thus polluting our wholesome and intellectual Christian minds! Learn more at #LactoseFartConspiracy
Lactose intolerance IS due to a protein. Lactose is a sugar that is broken down to glucose and galactose by the enzyme Lactase in the small intestine. People with Lactose intolerance do not produce the enzyme Lactase. And ezymes are PROTEIN complexes.
Hillary Briss The issue is that D"News" confuses Casein phosphoproteins with Lactose disaccharides.
People also often confuse lactose with _lactase_ ...the latter is indeed an enzyme, but the former is still a sugar.
Helpful?
Why Europeans and Asians evolved so differently
*Shows a black guy and a white woman*
It boggles my mind actually like dude you had one job
Ikr i was thats africa friend
Don’t they always show blacks?
"Modern humans moved out of East Africa as tiny little squirrel things" After he said that, I started having a bad feeling about this 😳
That's when I stopped watching the video hahah
He was trying to be funny...except that it wasn't.
He is being facetious, but we were fish and reptiles before we were.. "little squirrel things" according to Naked Science -- Mankind Rising - Where do Humans Come From
That's actually not such a crazy take. There is mounting evidence that proto humans did leave the African continent then return to it only to leave again tens of thousands of years later as homo erectus. Where they met other humans who never did return and at that point had already diverged themselves into several subspecies (neanderthal/denisovan)
@@suzukisixk7 Neanderthals and Denisovans aren't human, but apelike humanoids. They were a separate species altogether, grafted almost with the same amount of chromosomes as we true humans -- designed to corrupt the gene pool, like the Nephlim gene pool. Over time, they were able to fully mixed with true humans.
Unprofessional .
Just a dude reading somebody's website
This is youtube... everybody is a dr smh
But he has a decent mic
Pretty sure he's reading off of a script he put together from research.
👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌
i just want to take this opportunity to give a shout out to the people who invented cheese. I love you and always will
The people of Wisconsin thank you.
Can't live without my sharp cheddar~
you're welcome
I hate them. now its easier to get fat.
They probably were carrying milk in sheepskins attached to their camels, the swaying motion of the camel's gate churned the milk into cheese. So you should thank the camels!
Such a bait title. And really unprofessional narrator. I don't need someone to read to me. Come on, Discovery.
Would you prefer evalion haha lol
+EVILIMPERIALISM23 Evalion is bae
+OOO BBB she might be cute but she's a horrible person lol .
EVILIMPERIALISM23 For what reason ?
+OOO BBB you support racism ??
A better explanation for the mutation of lactose tolerance, which probably required significant environmental pressure, was the ability to process lactose during famines. This would explain the rather rapid pace in the diffusion of the mutation.
Remember that Europe is very cold and dark during the winter. Milk is a good source of nutrition and vitamins during winter when there's a lack of sunlight and plants can't grow.
@@Dushmann_ east Asia is also very cold during winter
@@Vampybattie North America too. Yet most North American natives are lactose intolerant AND have dark skin.
Asians drink more milk than Europeans in general, that study has always been stupid.
@@VampybattieAsia didn't have many aurochs like Europe.
Comment section is more fun
Nice
That theory has been shelved. Lucy the fossil has been superseded by older fossils found in Europe. That is why the whole world except for black African's have the same mydricondial DNA so he is spouting rubbish.
I stopped listening the second you said: The protein Lactose!
Lactose is a protein. Are you educated?
@@MrAmhara no I can't even read!
MrAmhara bruh did you skip 7 th grade biology class
@@Lana-hz7tl lol
@@MrAmhara not the smartest lad are you?
Lactose is a sugar, not a protein.
lactase is the protein. enzyme that crushes sugars
No lactose is a sugar composed of galactose and glucose actually you'll find!
You'll probably be thinking of Lactase that is an enzyme that breaks down Lactose, actually the two proteins in milk are Whey and Casein
but you need this protein to break down lactose
Scrolled to the comments to post this, someone already had. Thumbs up.
"the ones that could adapted and survive and the ones who couldn't died"
In short,
Europeans and Asians evolved. Differentely due to different environmental conditions,simple.
Jaspreet Singh no one can’t just simply “evolve” because of the environment. You jackass.
Zoda Ken WRONG. Only identical twins share the same genotype. Please learn what you are talking about and stop wasting everyone's time.
Aaron Gordon if you're denying that certain groups evolved different characteristics over time, you're just denying evolution. Which makes you no better than a creationist. Throughout human history we had isolating barriers which kept the different groups more or less separated. As a result we now exhibit certain physical differences due to different biological histories.
Since when was the definition of evolution a difference in the genotype only.
Google: the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
@Zoda Ken
Urine ideeot
why is my whole family purple except me?
go to a doctor
that was funny. now let's wait for the race war of who's most racist.
+Chase Nicholson cyanide poisoning that is why, stop trying to kill you family
You don't have enough colloidal silver in your diet.
you need egg plant in your diet
video title should be "how humAns becAme lactose intolerant"
Brix Keiffer Bataller actually humans were originally all lactose intolerant as most mammals are after sexual maturity but a mutation occured where humans could digest milk after sexual maturity.
You got it backwards
Part of the issue with archeological records is that some places preserved artifacts better than others. Tropical environments are very bad for maintaining fossils, whereas deserts are great for preserving
Lactose is a carbohydrate (sugar) not a protein
Asjen Mensink correct! Any word ending with ""ose"" is a sweet tasting carbohydrate that our liver turns into "Glucose" which is a fuel for our bodies.
No all foods are made out of sugar even protein . Protein is from plants it just have a smaller sugar that give it a name call protein .
@Enter the future. Not really, unless you are really trying say all foods are made out of carbon dioxide, water and sometimes fixed nitrogen! Because plants fix CO2 and water to make produce sugars that they metabolize into a variety of intermediate metabolites, some incorporating fixed nitrogen (like ammonia and nitrates). Using these to make amino acids, that are used to make proteins. But if you mean proteins are carbohydrates,. no they are not. They are polymers of amino acids and a different class of biomolecules.
I have a hunch he was trying to say lactase. Which is the protein that breaks down lactose into glucose and galactose.
@Joihn Ecker mostly right! -ose designates a carbohydrate. Many of the small ones that consist of just a couple of subunits are sweet to varying degrees. But not all of them. And some, like cellulose are huge polymers that are not sweet at all. -ase designates an enzyme, usually acting on a substrate that precedes the -ase.
As an aside. A number of dipeptides are extremely sweet. Aspartame is one of them. Curiously, many dextro-amino acids are also very sweet. Unlike the levo amino acids we use in proteins. I've tasted dextro-tryptohan, which is very sweet and tastes pretty good. Unlike levo-tryptohan which is tastes a bit like mothballs smell.
I think of the "Siberian Fox Experiment", where a fur farm wanted to domesticate foxes to be able to handle them easier. They bred the most tame ones. What happened was astounding! The fox's DNA changed as they got tamer and tamer to having spotted coats, curly tails, floppier ears and started to bark and play like dogs! Not only would this explain how changes in wolves transformed them into dogs as they became more domesticated, but could explain the many changes to the human genome. Look it up...fascinating study!
This is called domestication syndrome and humans do in fact have it. Compared to our ancestors our mouths are smaller, we’ve lost certain muscles, our heads are rounder…many other features as well. We did in fact domesticate ourselves
Not that fascinating... we genetically engineered foxes to be more like dogs.....
Makes sense. Similar animal. We're forcing the breeding and mating to favor traits which are favorable to us rather than suited to their natural wild environment so their survival depends on carrying traits favored by humans.
Makes perfect sense and actually acts as proof of evolution if anything. It's only fascinating if you just learned the theory of evolution two days ago.
@@laurajaneluvsbeauty9596 well yeah. We're not feral.
Think about beauty standards. Who are the most successful in terms of sex? Those we consider attractive.
Thus those traits are passed on more often. Short women are preffered so those traits survive. Women stay short. Men get taller because tall men are preferred. Darker skin is more successful. Curvy bodies for women are more successful while muscular and Lean body types for men are more successful. Smaller noses are more successful. Large buttocks are proving to be a sticking trend that may translate into traits passed on just like bigger breasts (men developed a love for bigger breasts because it suggests on a primitive level that the women is more fertile and can sufficiently feed lots of children. This isnt 10p% true but men keep picking these traits so after so many generations you started seeing more and more women with bigger breasts and more men who are attracted to them to the point it's most men now)
Evolution is all about sex. Nature doesent magically know what features you need to survive. It's the animals who pick features in their mates that end up helping them and their children survive. And these traits that are successful keep getting picked and eventually reinforced.
So humans have the potential to guide our evolution In such a way we actually regress. That is highly possible.
We can breed ourselves into being a race of short big booty morons with big chests and low brows and thick thighs just because we keep reinforcing beauty standards.
OR we could become a race of ditzy statuesque anorexic models not suited for physical labor and combat nor building and agriculture.
Experts predict the next species Will be highly influenced by technology to the point they'll have an extra eyelid to filter blue lights and hunched backs and cramped hands.
@@juanmccoy3066 obviously i understand how evolution works so idk why you felt the need to type a book.
All of that is just juvenilization.
This is the first time I clicked on this guy's channel and I sincerely can't understand why he has 400k subs. He doesn't do anything at all appart from reading from Wikipedia, which all of you can do. Ew.
Another example of TH-cam's selective and demanding crowd.
or notes he's taken from encyclopedia.com
Tom Chhkuot Everything you say is ok. Maybe you prefer podcast, but TH-cam is the biggest web on earth to watch... videos. Yeah, videos.
So... your whole argument is invalid, and this guy still is terribly overrated.
i think its ways to earn money this kind of systematic ideas you can earn money everyone had choice to do they want or like, guessing that not everybody like to read on there own but podcast will do to at least increase there knowledge beyond others interest or field of studies.
Exactly...BORING!! I knew this when l was 8!
Samui Style And that's why I don't have 400k subscribers. But I didn't expect them neither, because I don't work like many others do in their TH-cam channels. This guy doesn't, he's just having a laugh at you, lazy people not even able to read from Wikipedia.
I just devolved watching this fml
Paul Williams Stud!
As an aboriginal, I can confirm, milk fucks us UP.
Oh cool My dude
Aww. At least you save up on the milk budget
well, you're not wrong
Kara P what kind of milk you are drinking?
the best kind
centrelink does as well
I came here to learn why Asians have shorter eyes than Europeans.
I did not get the answer I wanted, but I learnt that a lot of people still couldn't drink milk, so I'm satisfied.
Samovar maker you haven't seen the Asians lately. much it is food supply related. they are no longer short.
Asians are still short lol, maybe not as much as before but it's the Americans fault for giving them tons of heart-diseases and cancer because of animal products, and them getting taller because of it makes it even worse for the heart, America is a fucking stupid country
Compared to the undeveloped countries like many African countries and the like, Sweden is actually a pretty good place; kind of equal (of course, never a 100% equal because politics are dumb)
BUT, compared to Singapore, Denmark, Aussie, Japan or Taiwan......
The politics are dumb like they are in most countries, the schools are so bad and being a gifted child is horrible in Swedish schools because you get anxiety from doing new things due to being perfectionistic as hell, then there's also very poor knowledge in the books we have here and I found that in a high school book they didn't mention Meat as one of the main reasons for colon cancer. The economic lesson spreads the usual lies about the animal products and acts like eggs are healthy, along with them only mentioning that meat is increasing the risk for HEART-ATTACKS, nothing else. Along with them saying that vegetarians have to eat much of beans and such to get protein when in reality you actually do not need that much of beans due to there being protein in all vegetables as it exists naturally in them.
In Sweden we have a test called ''Högskoleprovet'' which literally means ''High school test'' You can take it after completing elementary school at the age of around 16 (but possibly 15 or such if you skipped some grades), so. The högskole-provet has a system like this: *2* is the biggest result you can get on the test, *1* is what average person would manage to get at the högskole-prov so that's the normal giftedness of people, and *what is required to be a teacher is the result of 0,2*... That's like being 4 times as stupid as the average person... Yup. Which means people who have an IQ of 65 could possibly become teachers;-;
Then we have the hospitals.. there's a crisis with the nurses and employees due to nurses getting low wages, along with the hospitals being chaotic when it comes to labor and births of children. Women have to wait for sometimes hours in places like Stockholm, people get hurt, it's just chaotic. If I became pregnant (which I, as a 13-year-old, would not) I would rather go to another country in order to be assured that I am safe at the hospital than give birth in the worst hospitals, although there are the smaller useless hospitals that rarely give much labour in the middle of some country-place.
*What else? Oh, about the politics again, seeing the news of the politics is like watching ''The Kardashians'' Politicians version.* Most politicians do not have much education, and most just go into politics because they failed at being a businessman or the like and have no choice. There's still a bit of sexism among politicians OF COURSE since women apparently suck due to being too smart for men, and then the main point...
*THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING NO IMPORTANT LAWS THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT NATURE THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT EQUALITY OR THE SCHOOL OR HOSPITALS THEY RARELY MAKE CHANGES THEY JUST DISCUSS I HATE IT*
What else? Well, that's it. Oh, and we have a huge crisis on teachers, which is due to them changing a simple law in the late 80s, they earn very little and again, are usually dumb. My English teacher misspells a lot of words during class although her accent is very mid-Atlantic, my wood-chop/woodcraft-teacher lacks grammar and writes really stupid sentences that look dumb, my economic teacher as mentioned earlier lacks knowledge while I knew a lot more about foods than her, my P.E teacher and 95% of teacher lack empathy at all and seem to not even know that disorders such as OCD, PTSD or extreme perfectionism exists, of course, they don't know about gifted children either.
OH right, America is very bad; they eat very unhealthy food; almost all Americans have a lack of vegetables in their diet, and they are the ones who eat and produce the most red meat in the world and basically the most meat in general, lots of dairy like Scandinavians as well, then there's the unhealthy breakfast and corn starch along with sugar in general.
Next, the Republicans; racist, rich, unfair, selfish. Would write more detailed but a bit busy.
Democrats: the opposite, but still a bit too conservative for me. Should think more about the climate, and maybe even more on the people which Obama was starting to do, ah.. if only he could be president a longer time than that...
Also, so many people voting for Republicans means there are many racists in America, and there sure are.
Americans are nationalists typically too, and if a whole nation basically becomes nationalistic it's turning into narcissism, but a narcissism of your country rather than yourself.
There's no fat shaming, which causes, even more, people to turn obese.
and politics again;
A racist, homophobic, sexist, transphobic, discriminating rapist became president.
As for politics, the election/voting system is *FREAKING OUTDATED*.
It's not democratic at all because the people don't get the vote, it's the electors who do, in the end. One person can have more votes on average; like how Hillary had more votes than Dump, BUT.. electors matter more than the people, of course, and the system makes so much sense...
it's more based on how people live than it's democratic. what if the liberal voters are spread across the whole US and not big in several states at all, but the Republicans are pretty heavy in certain areas? That's what decided the recent election, and that is not very democratic. It annoys me to HELL how you can have such an outdated, unlogical system *FOR ELECTING THE NEXT FRICKING PRESIDENT.* It's so unlogical, unprofessional, stupid. Politicians..
Kate The Moo haha have fun under trump you're welcome
lactose is a sugar not protein
RoyalFox lol true
RoyalFox Thats why he is so incorrect to blame drinking Milk on our skin colour, its happened over a long time all due to climate, hot climate black skin, cool climate white skin, its part of our DNA & he is talking bs as I passed My BHS on this particular topic!🌎💥
There isn't a place on Earth where most ppl don't drink Milk, we are weaned on it & so is every Mammal esp domestic Cats, but adult Cats shouldn't have Milk as they have problems & can't digest it any better than a Dog, both are meat eaters yet ppl have always assumed Adult Cats drink Milk, they will given the chance as a Dog would & most mammals but how many ppl give Dogs milk with their food? Cats should drink water only with meat not Milk! Man is whatever colour due only to the climate his ancesters lived in up leaving for a different place & climate!💥
.
but milk itself is protein rich. it just so happens that to get all the proteins you gotta drink the milk -fat, protein and lactose included- and whoever didn't have the lactose-tolerant mutation couldn't, then, have all them fats/proteic nutrition that would come along with it.
You never mentioned that it’s believed that some humans arrived in North and South America, not by land but by boat following a coastal route following the coastal seaweed and kelp forests, fish, seals and sea lions.
I had to stop less than a minute in when you said "evolution forces adaptation". Please research what those terms mean before you make videos like this.
Thomas Baker Yeah it's the other way around!
He must have an IQ of 70.
Agreed. Power of necessity dictates
Thomas Baker the fact that your arguing about it kind of shows each of your lack of understanding. Individual mutation does force adaptation. The process of evolution also forces adaptation. The process of adaptation favors those capable of successfully adapting, and Vice Versa.
Quite your bitching.
it’s just a grammatical mistake. It’s not a big deal.
Dear science plus, lactose is a sugar, not a protein
Sri Lata Nankissoon I know rightt
Sri Lata Nankissoon I just got though taking biology
dear science plus the figure 100 percent of native americans cannot process mile is wrong. the figure is closer to 75%
Has -ose ending.
Is sugar
Everything checks out.
They didn't move from the land bridge into the United States . . . they moved into North America.
They did come from parts in Alaska, so yes the United States.
There was no USA back then. And it was also Russian territory before American. Plus the land bridge would have included parts of Canada. So .... North America would be much more accurate.
Besides, Alaska was sold from Russian to the United States not so long ago....
Semantics
Pedro Jose Gonzalez Ramirez 150 years ago
Seems you didn't mention native Australians. They must've been part of the very earliest of human migration out of Africa. Even before the ones you mentioned in asia with the Laos skull. It's believed they've been on the continent around 60k years
SOME people of the world can't eat burned bread. They are black toast intolerant.
Canned Laughter 🤣
Not me, I love burnt toast, especially the heel!
Charred bread with olive oil is better than bacon. Go try. Get actual bread though. Cibatata and baget style bread you can get anywhere for a dollar or a little bit more are best
White bread doesn't have any nutrition in the first place.Corney joke back at you boss.
@@aprilcooke8340 Ah!!!!! You call the end of the loaf the 'heel'.
So do . Do you have Scottish roots?
My English friends call the heel the 'knobbie'.
But we are not allowed to talk about differences in intelligence or aggressiveness through evolution.
+Walter Black Amen brother!
+Walter Black because of political correctness.... and the dominant social group in the US happens to be in the median scale.. so why bother talking about it if you are not the top.. am i right?
There isn't much difference, race is not a deciding factor for a persons intelligence.
+Walter Black Because your assertions have not been verified by scientific evidence and the studies that have been done do not validate you. The kind of people who use to tout this garbage about the intelligence of the blacks used it to justify slavery of the blacks, now they just do it to denigrate them as it validates their bigoted preconceptions. Racist clowns own this trope, your spin shows who you are.
GreaterThanGodLike race certainly isn't but the work ethic between ethnic groups plays a big factor in calculating once intelligence since.. the majority of "IQ" tests are an amalgamation of accumulated knowledge and exposure to more problem solving, thus you can indirectly conclude that certain races have more advantage.
Isn't lactose a sugar not a protein Trace? Hence why it ends in -ose
PotatoesAreGood :3 TRUE.
PotatoesAreGood :3 I was about to point that out
Michel Etienne Sartre we're talking about lactose*
I got on a roll and misspoke! thanks for looking out y'all :D
Trace Dominguez 6:57 lactose is not a proteine is a sugar ;-)
Title: "Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently".
Thumbnail: Same old.. same old..
I was going to leave a comment about how stupid this video was but after reading the comments section it seems the job has been done already 😂
This is why people say American's school system are lower than the other countries.
😔😔😔😔😔😕😕😟😟
😂😂😂😂
The white man's science is an opinion. Pseudoscientific research!!!
Here come the religions who try to prove this, only difference is they do it without evidence
@archie baldwin coming from the number one fucktard! Did you even watch video to know what I was getting at?
I thought this video was about why Europeans and Asians evolved differently. This video is about all of humanity
Aaron Godley Yeah, I was like hmm.. I got something else outta that
Aaron Godley I was like you guys for a second then I realized that Europeans and Asians didn't evolve from each other. The title is asking why Europeans and Asians evolved from Africans in different ways to adapt to their new climates, of course he didn't speak as much to the Asian adaptations.
Odin029 I don't think they evolved from Africans as African features are highly dominant. In order for a population to remain Non African, you need a larger Non African population to digest the genetic input from Africa. Hence, the selective breeding between the Africans and Non Africans. The conclusion is there always was a sizable non African population in Asia. This theory is full of holes and what they have traced is simply the African slave trade route. The European slavers exported tribes of African slaves all over Asia. Even then the Asian population has always maintained the selective breeding with Africans to preserve their Non African Appearance. The two Asian races - Indo-Europeans and Sino have different but parallel evolutionary path to their African cousins. All three evolve from the same ancestors at some distant point in time.
Samuel Jones
I think all of these changes happened well before the concept of slavery existed. Europeans didn't really start dealing in African slaves until the 16th century ad. I'm not sure how many African Slaves were sent to Asia by the Europeans because in their Asian colonies they tended to use indigenous people for labor.
Odin029 Nope. The African features are too dominant. There is no way pure Africans can produce an Asian. In order for Asians to make Asians in Asia, there had to be a very large Asian population to digest the little African input. Asians are also known to breed selectively with Africans because of their highly dominant African features and that's what keeps Asian population free of African features. This is a major sexual orientation that helped Asians keep themselves Non African. Even in Egypt where the Asians pushed the Africans towards the South, there was selective breeding till date in order to keep their Asian Features.
The little DNA that you find outside of Africa doesn't prove that Africans Migrated to Asia or America. Its just what was left of the Slave trade. Before Europeans there were Arab Slave Traders. Negros in India were first brought by the Mughals. The slave trade was so bad that Entire tribes were processed and sent to plantations all over the world. You have been tracing these "ancient" genes and nothing else.
The video was interesting and informative, but had little to do with the title of the video. You look at the name of a video and create expectations, deciding whether or not to watch it. So is naming things accurately too much to ask?
Kgcopper Yeah fuck D-news and this guy that commentated on it. I always fall for the title because it sounds interesting then when I watch it, they talk about something else that is not what the title suggested.
Misleading title, but the video interesting
Kgcopper did you miss the part where he talked about the difference in how we evovled differently?
TwiztidMaGiC No I didn't. Did you miss the part where never got around to telling us exactly the difference between how Asians and Europeans evolved? Which is what the video's title would lead one to believe, it being called "Why Europeans and Asians Evolved So Differently".
Kgcopper where does native americans originate from? He's talking about people migrating from Africa to europe and asia and how they evolved differently, but that must have skipped your attention completely?
First off modern humans did not come from East Africa. The oldest site is near Morocco in the northwest. In South Africa another site. Likely the species evolved all over Africa.
the better question is why are Africans so different from everyone else.
+Seta-San which ones??? there is more genetic variety in the african continent between groups than when you compare africans to everyone else! Africans are so different from each other.
I guess because there are many different climates(people in africa are very diverse) in Africa and they were already adapted well enough to survive in there climates
+Seta-San NO, just the opposite.
+Seta-San Actually Eurasians have more in common with Africans than Africans do with each other.
do you listen to yourself? how fucking vague is that. clearly not all urasians can possibly have more in common with all Africans when they, according to you, have less in common with each other... If you're talking about the split between north African(mediterrian) Africans to sub-Saharan Africans I can understand....
You should put a disclaimer in the video as theory. You could end up giving the wrong information to young minds
+Sapienti Sat
that sarcasm tho
+SirMASUM shit, science is wrong informations, my car works by magic I knew it
+SirMASUM Could you point out the parts in the video that are theory but came off as fact?
***** And you both want a disclaimer that this is theory as to not give young minds the wrong information. He already uses words like "probably" and "maybe". I don't see where the wrong information was explicitly given. Clearly his comment is meant for people to understand it's theory and not believe everything said in this video, so even if "scientific theories" are generally accepted, what's the point of his comment? I just want to know where the video gave wrong information so I can point something out to you two.
***** It isn't though :/ Otherwise theories wouldn't be disproven or replaced by other theories... I even looked it up to make sure I wasn't wrong am making myself look dumb. Theories are there to TRY to EXPLAIN the facts. Even if some theories are reaaaaaaaaally likely to be true, it doesn't make it fact. I think the only special exceptions would be those that we can't prove YET. But again, if we can't prove it we can't really know if it's true or if we're missing something else. Maybe a scientific theory explained so many things but it ended up being wrong once. Then the entire thing is useless. So until we have proof of a scientific theory being 100% correct, we can't say they're fact
Really enjoyed this video.. I do think that as of right now we are reversing this differences. We got to a point where humans migrate more and more to the other side of the world, have families with different background partners.
So I guess it would be safe to say that we have been getting more different by the century and now we will be getting more equal. Exciting stuff
How is that multiculturalism working out lately in the West? Doesn’t seem to be going so well. Simply put it has failed.
Very educational I always wondered why skin color changed and I assume facial features became unique to different areas was because of closer breeding . Genes can be complicated
Get ready for racial slurs and hatred in the comments.
+SoundOfLegend he really should have disabled the comments for this vidio
+The Bunny Suit Killer there's a difference between taking away people's right to hate on a national scale and refusing to provide a platform to hate on a TH-cam vidio scale. Just face it, having one on such an inflammatory subject as, Anything to do with race, only attracts people like you.
+The Bunny Suit Killer lol, nice witt, cheaper than a tooth pick, but it make me laugh
+The Bunny Suit Killer traitor? what a sad person you are . what world do you live in . look at yourself before you make yourself look like a fool
lol XD
Lactose is not proteins they are suguars
Yes - it is LactAse that is a protein - specifically a small intestine enzyme - that is responsible for catalyzing the breakdown of lactOse, which is a sugar, into the sugars galactose and glucose.
U didn't cover why Asians evolved the Asian eye. Or why it evolved that way. I read it helped protect the eyes from sunnier or snowy regions in northern Asia but it doesn't make sense to me. I still have to squint when it's really sunny out! It's not like Asia gets significantly more sunlight than Europe...
biohazard737 Most programs on the topic I've seen suggest it was more sexual selection rather than natural selection. In other words, it was a desired trait to an ancient culture at some point and people with that feature eventually became dominant. It's much the same way dog breeders will breed dogs for specific traits they want to see passed down. It has little to do with the region or climate.
***** never thought of that, thanks
Africans and Europeans can also have "asian eyes".
james learing the proper term is epicanthic fold and there are different degrees, start and end points.
zeiitgeist I know that. I'm just saying that it's not exclusive to mongoloids.
In eastern europe we are evolving into having no hangover from vodka
Nature is beautiful
And de-evolving into fascist again. Must we re-start anew again?
What did the librarian say to the student?
Read more
Imperial Ugh.... god dammit lol
Haha.. gold
lol. awesome
God damn it
For some reason it made me cringe so hard.
The thumbnail shows a black and a white person. You guys need a pair of new glasses?
I thought the same thing
Yeah, but the video really doesn't have anything to do with Asians. The title is what they screwed up.
Speaking as a Nigerian, and as a member of the Yoruba ethnic group who also constantly interacts with members of the Igbo ethnic group, I boldly say, that fact - "90% of the Yoruba and Igbo tribes cannot digest milk" - is completely wrong. I have literally only met two people in my lifetime who are lactose intolerant. Oddly enough I learnt that that was even possible from watching American movies. Please my Yoruba and Igbo brethren out there feel free to concur.
Maybe they adapted through conditioning
Lactose intolerance is literally on a spectrum. Your body can produce more or less of the enzymes to break down the lactose sugar. Also some people have a hard time digesting the casine protein in milk, but this is misdiagnosed as lactose intolerance.
Yoruba, Fula and Tuareg mixed and can consume lactose and milk products with no problem, though my sister is lactose intolerant.
I am of Native American and everyone in my family is lactose intolerant. We have all been diagnosed, but my mother didn't know what she felt wasn't normal because we are all on different levels (ie my mom can drink a decent amount of milk and she just gets bloated and uncomfortable, my sister can drink a single glass and be fine, but I cannot consume any dairy without feeling sick.) Intolerance has different levels, nobody is the same.
I'm a black American who is married to a white American and she's lactose intolerant. She gets the bubble guts from drinking milk whereas I consume it by the gallons. All of my cousins did as well. I've heard of entire African tribes consuming strictly milk as a way to gain weight fast, as part of their tribal tradition. Something done by the men. Whichever men has the most weight at the end of the 6 month milk diet becomes the tribal leader or some shit. Are you familiar with this African tradition? This video is just racist propaganda with so many holes in it that I feel like eating swiss cheese. Cheese anyone? Well according to this I can't eat cheese cause i'm suppose to be lactose intolerant. Cheese one of my favorite foods!
I have never believed the out of Africa theory. We all evolved seperately. Asians, Africans and Europeans did not come from the same place. Finding artifacts is harder in Europe and Asia because of the seasonal changes which cause a lot of errosion. The artifacts are easier to preserve in dry places and Europe is smaler, so ciries were build and exoanded upon cities.Europeans and Asians have developped so many different tools, Innovations, architekture, food.. .So different from the central Africa humans. We do not even digest the same. Its rediculous to think we all came from one ancestor.
It’s impossible for us to have all evolved separately because populations evolve together. If we didn’t come from the same place we wouldn’t be the same species or able to breed. It’s the same concept as having family, you can’t have biological family without a shared ancestor.
Africans have also developed many different things including food and architecture. Comparing everyone’s dna we find that all humans are 99.9% identical.
I agree with you me and my friends all of us never believed that none sens Africa theory
@@TmanRock9 we share 98% DNA with primates as well, this only proves we had a common ancestor at some point. I am talking about the evolution of the human species and cultures. Just because we found bones in Africa it means nothing. Because tausends of years cause a lot of change. Dog breeds can be mixed as well, humans bred them in different parts of the world and they all evolved seperately, with different traits, characters and so on. They did not all evolved from the same wolf, but from the wolf as a species, but the wolf was not native to only one area, not was there one wolf family.
We all came from the homo sapiens ancestor but, the homo sapiens did not live only in Africa. He lived in Asia, Europe and so on. Those grops evolved seperately and according to the environment they chose.
@@andreabrava6899 yeas and if we share a common ancestor then that means we must all share an origin point. Modern humans are 99.9% identical meaning all humanities last common ancestor was in the last couple hundred thousand years or so tops, and it can be traced back into Africa.
Finding the oldest Homo sapiens remains in Africa exclusively means a lot. Well sure once humans migrated out of Africa they evolved down separate paths, but we are all still the same species the out of Africa theory simply claims that humans originated in Africa and later left not that there wasn’t any evolution that occurred after divergence.
All dogs do share a common ancestor mean the same individual ancestor.
At one point I time yes Homo sapiens only lived in Africa. Homo sapiens have been in africa for at least 230,000 years before anyone was in Eurasia or the Americas. They only evolved separately after they split from the original population in Africa.
@@jane4670doesn’t matter we’re all still related
This is like watching a high school student presenting a poorly researched essay that they didn't bother to attempt to memorize.
mint83
Truth. I instantly came to the comment section 20 seconds into this PowerPoint presentation to see what was up haha
I instantly came down here after I saw him pause and stare at his computer while clicking to the next page of his notes. This video is so poorly made no pictures or anything just some guy talking oddly.
It's like even he is not sure of what he is saying and just relying on the laptop. Ugh so cringey when he makes eye contact to the screen of the computer.
At over half a million subscribers, he should hire an animator, and rehearse his lines.
I don't know if I should agree because I get why but also this comment is pretty rude for no reason so idk
Cool video! I would never have thought that the availability of certain foods would have such a huge influence on evolution
History is so interesting. Science and knowledge is so awesome.
true that, it is better than alcohol and other drugs. Also with no "hangover" and none of the negative consequences and side effect.
I think I will make learning and understanding my "drug of choice" from this point on.
too bad its all bs
They're robots because they understand basic English grammar?
Most of what he told just assumption of ppl based on things founds and they dont have any idea about , there was barely any science there
They have different features because of the environment that they settled in. Different environment leads to different stresses on the body, which leads to different adaptations, and eventually different features. I thought he was quite clear.
lactose is a sugar, not a protein; lactase is the protein
When he says people couldn't eat a certain food so "they died" is misleading.
It would be more accurate to say that people who couldn't eat a certain food died off. Those with disadvanged traits fade away becuase they aren't able to breed as effectively as others who have more advantageous ones.
And those who were too lazy to adapt to the changing climate and didn't make effective tools for survival etc.
th-cam.com/video/eeGyDDfoYKQ/w-d-xo.html
Same shit.
It would be more accurate to say people that ate a certain food like cereal could pass on their Gene's more successfully. Proteins from cattle, cereals produce big and strong people that also have great immune systems that increases their survival. But it's more complicated than food intolerance. For example a group might be able to tolerate cereal grain but if they dont have the technology to produce or access to grain makes them more susceptible to famine. Grain can be stored about 6 months dry or a year frozen.
Absorption needs to be taken into consideration also... even today, certain minorities are "here" now, and living among us... and because of mixed breeding those that may not exist in "pure" form several thousand years from now will still be here, their DNA will survive because of interbreeding... Neanderthals did not disappear, they are here today, just as those europeans that existed before breeding with Neanderthals are here today... mixed with the Neanderthals... Also, dinosaurs, it has been proven, are still among us, as birds... they did not "die out," they adapted and evolved... so keep this in mind when discussing certain groups "dying out" etc.
potato potato
I'm a lot of genetics. I love finding out new things about myself and where I came from. I find literally every culture and everything interesting in some way. This was an awesome video... Thanks! ✔
So glad I read the comments first. The way this video was phrased and it's cover art made me question if it was a reliable source or not. And this is why I usually only watch video from pbs or a university
Why do we know more about dinosaurs than ourselves
FAT JAXSON we don’t. You may, but we absolutely know more about humans than dinosaurs.
FAT JAXSON Lol
coz your mumma is one huggeee bitch
Klaus Rasch thotasaurus sex 😆
Dinosaurs are fake. That's why. That's why we know more about "space" too. Sorry if you didn't know.
hyenas can run more than 20 miles without slowing its pace
+Эдуард Вятчанин watty ye chatting about ya moon man?? xD
+Эдуард Вятчанин What use would a hyena have to run for literally over 20 miles straight without slowing down. i bet they are capable but seriously running that long requires so much energy that for anything but a human who can have access to plenty of food it would be inefficient for any other animal and they simple wouldn't waste that much energy for no reason or even if it was for food. walking/trotting for over 20 miles? yea many animals do that. running? no.
Brave Cat if u pay attention to your biology class at school, u would know that hyenas' top speed is not as impressive as other big cats' like cheetahs and lions. instead of sprinting to chase down their prey, hyenas run a marathon to exhaust their prey, which often lasts for more than 20 miles. just so you know
+Эдуард Вятчанин You are correct (said a biology major and teacher). Moreover, humans are the best runners on the entire planet for the same reason. You mentioned cheetahs, did you know when cheetahs reach a certain body temperature, they just stop moving? At all. You can kick a lion in the chin, in a hot noon in the Savannah, and the lion will not budge. Many animals can run faster than humans, but we run more, thanks to the absurd amount of sudoriparous glands. One human have more capability of homeostasis (maintain the same amount of temperature, for example) than an entire herd of horses. We can chase anything, that's what put us in the apex of the food chain, we were born to run.
Marc Abelha is it just me or i thought some guys at nat geo busted the myth about cheetah overheating? though i cant really remember the details, i can recall that one of the dudes say that cheetahs' body temperature only rises after a succesful hunt, not during the sprint
*6:56 lactose is a sugar not a protein
Great video though
+Chris Bieker One of the problems with ad libbing and not reading a script is that you make a few mistakes.
+Chris Bieker no its not - its highly incorrect
+shgfe3ay Yeah because evolution isn't real and the Earth is only 4000 years old, right?
No 6000 year...lets get it rightb
Quick tip: Don't look at the comments.
Oh god, I should have listened.
Words of wisdom
Ahahaha too late!!
Patric Nybro hahahaa awesome tip hahaha
Thank you, i'm going to stop here.
The title is Europeans and Asians but the thumbnail is clearly an African and a European.
You do realize in 1000 years they'll still have so many good quality photos and videos of us, the people in the future will probably be creeped out by as, since over 1000 years we'd probably look a little different
J P. It will not happen if nuclear war happen
you do realize there could have been flying cars already and advanced technology such as the so called uknown civilization of "Atlantis", and that in the passing of time all the digital means would have withered and turned to dust? take the pyramids for example , not digitalised = survived through millenials ,unless we find a new solution
take the biblical disasters, or major natural disasters that destroyed and extincted civilizations and species , who knows , we could have been on the 20th RESET of the world
Harris Dimitr mind blown
You Tube, I disagree with this, not all people looked the same, many many years ago, there were people with different characteristics, height, shape etc (in turkey there is a tribe that still walks on all four) don't take things for granted, so some people looked the same and some other did not. Peace ✌
Publisher Uc Union moneyblog
that's the point. a new lifeform will mutate from our radioactive corpses 😱
Why is every comment section of evolutional videos on TH-cam infested with irrational and belligerent children.
good question
+William Bengt
Yet there is no question mark.
That should be a D news video subject...
Treat others how you want to be treated how on earth is evolution childiss and irrational?
Treat others how you want to be treated you know evolution isn't about the origin of the first life, ift's about the adaptation of life to it's environment over time due to "survival of the fitest" and descent with inherited characteristics. This is something that is observable in the present world and for which there is a lot of experimental evidence.
Absolutely fascinating. It feels nice to know how things came to be and how they impact us today.
Your anthropology is blowing my mind.
Why am I finding a lot of White and Black supremacist BS in the comment section?Oh yeah,because it's TH-cam.
+HCN 27.0253g/mol It is BS the main Fact is we are all Human
Put some graphics into this.. no body wants to hear a guy talk for 11mins 🤦🏻♂️
literally i was like what the fuck???
A lot of graphics that people use are worthless. Boring visuals mean I play mahjong on another tab.
big facts he made bank off this vid
I'm sorry, are you saying you can't focus on someone talking for only 11 minutes??
@Sol Cutta Okay. But... In which parts of this do you think he is monotonous and droning?
And what does joining a political party have to do with being a bad narrator?
My ex husband never evolved.
Well you married him.
Individuals don't evolve, populations do, your comment doesn't make any sense.
You should have picked me instead.
That explains why your kids are animals.
Lo Basque he did when he left you
THIS WAS AN AMAZING VIDEO
He tried so hard not to make this sound racist XD
no he didnt, your just a fucking moron with no social skills
U stupid
a shame. the reactive stupid people who scream racism are the problem. they keep discussion of an actual thing taboo, subjecting everyone to the consequences of ignorance of true understanding and discussion of race.
No. He is just not racist.
Where the hell did you see racism?
Haha his t-shirt says "I'm on a roll" and it's a bit of butter on a bread roll.
hhahaha shutup, basic bitch
wow.... someone discouverd humor - well done, what is next: when it rains and you are outside you get wet?
Haha your profile pic is an unflattering photo of Mariah Carey...
Proud Titanic Denier found the angry black guy
That was absolutely fascinating! About a half the way through I realized he was talking about lactose intolerance. I guess I more or less thought of it as a disease, so it was very enlightening to find out it's part of evolution.
And I'll need to find that squirrel video. We started out as squirrel-like creatures! I bet we were so cute!
Our building has a whole collection of bird feeders outside the windows in the dining room. So the local birds and squirrels are well-fed. And apparently they have a fair amount of leisure time. Yesterday morning there was a red squirrel in the tree, just sitting and watching traffic for about 45min. A daydreaming squirrel! How sweet!😉
thats so cute! i wish i could see that!
Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently FROM AFRICANS!
Just stop scrolling
I wish I could
Oh no, oh shut, I should of listened, you tried to warn me but I didn't listen. DO NOT SCROLL DOWN OR YOU WILL HAVE ANUERISM
You were good, son, real good. Maybe even the best.
No
I should probably take your advice but my curiosity hurts
So racism is based on who ate more cereal.
Arcaneus Umbra
I’ve gave up halfway through the video so this comment section is quite a roller coaster.
Race exists, they just want us to feel like it does not.
No, Africans are a different species from Europeans and Asians
The problem with 'race exists' is it leads to racism and nonsense like 'Africans are a different species'.
We are all Africans. We all evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago from a number of around 10,500. Which means, we are all related. We are not only all one species, but in many ways, we are all one 'race' (in fact, many scientists don't even use the term 'race' because it's so useless). Then we went to India and China and became Germanic people later in the North/West, and others, and later became Angles-Saxons, Celts, Romans, etc. in Great Britain (skipped a lot of history, just focusing on England/America now).
So, everybody in England and America is really just a Germanic person or Dutch/Roman/Greek in some cases, in a way. The first people to be called 'English' were the Angles, a Germanic tribe from the East. And almost all Americans are English or Germanic (Dutch, etc.). Unless they are Mexican, Spanish, African, Native, etc. so, there's not even such a thing as a 'white American' or 'an English person'. Most of us are just from Germanic Europe. For sure, there's no such thing as a 'white American' because 'American' means everybody from the Americas, not the US, and you're only about 300 years old, so, you're simply not old enough to be a 'white American', you're just a Dutch or English person. Your mother and father could be American, but that doesn't really make you American in any meaningful way.
This explains why it's one of the few places where if you're born there, it makes you 'American' or is able to. If you're born on French land, that doesn't magically make you French. We only have to go back to your grandparents or great-grandparents and you're not American (and your DNA would show clearly that you're mostly Euporean/British). Thus some have called American nationalism 'hubris at its finest'. It's really hated by everybody other than Americans. I suppose it's like being born in the North of England vs the South of England. It doesn't make much sense to try and act as if you're a completely different Englishman having been born in one or the other. There's no real difference other than dialect. But, I suppose, the Americans have this system because otherwise, they would need to call themselves 'US Europeans' or 'British-Germanic Americans', some people have suggested the term 'USer' instead of 'American', but my problem isn't with the term 'American' itself, more the fact they think it means something and my problem with American nationalism. In fact, it's so strange it creates more an American supremacy, 'rawr, my parents were born here, therefore, I'm a real American [white] and better than you'. No wonder America pretty much invented white supremacy.
And all modern humans (every human alive today and there are no other humanoids left, either) is part of the same species. A species is defined as that which you can create offspring with. So, the Neanderthals were, in fact, humans. And even you didn't know that Africans are the same species, they have to be, anyway, because Africans can create offspring with both Asians and Europeans (any other human, for that matter).
Thank you for not doing your research Warhammer Workshop because Asians and Europeans originate in Asia, not Africa as previously believed. There have been studies on this and you can easily find them unless you're scared of becoming "racist" which by the way is biological in humans. Humans should and are racist by default.
I think it has a lot to do with breeding with other hominids. Europe had white Neanderthals, Asia had short Floresiensis, Africa and Asia had Erectus, Africa had Heidelbergensis. Could be that many if not most of our differences in height, facial features, and skin color are due to having mixed with these hominids.
I'm sure some mixing may have done that to an extent. How much, we don't know. For example, pale skin is not necessarily the result of neanderthal genetics. The neanderthals themselves are the descendants of a hominid migration out of Africa. It's likely that we already possessed whatever genes are required for light skin.
renge9909 the possibility that pale skin was a mutation exclusive to Neanderthals is possible tho
I believe it to be a combination of all the factors, the interbreeding, the different climates and diets, all of it plays a role in why everyone is so different, just as it does with all other species of animals.
Asia also had Denisovans .... Until these days nobody knows how they looked like
Everyone who isn’t sub-saharan has neanderthal in them. It has always been said that neanderthals were smarter and the world’s average IQ charts don’t seem to say otherwise...
Why did humans evolve different physical characteristics?
For example, if aliens landed on Earth and saw a Swede and an Australian Aborigine standing together, they would assume they`re a different species.
With these comments you can tell how many don't read more then one book.
*than
Brain moves to fast to keep up with typing.
too*
*
You may call me that, unfortunately the sisterhood no longer exists.
Why do they never allow for the possibility of boats any time before the sumarians. It's just silly to think that people capable of inventing farming couldn't build a bit. Ridiculous!!!
Lisa Adler you are absolutely right, and there are legitimate theories that do address that possibility.
Lattio Grant Irish American
I don't believe that they would've built them on a large enough scale to have any real impact before then.
Lisa Adler
You are totally right.
After Pangea and all the continents was seperated long before humans was born, how come all humans had fire, simular weapons ( knife, axe, spear, bow and arrow etc) and also began to build strange, big monuments such as pyramids more or less at the same time, if they was totally seperated by oceans?
Clearly they must have had some kind of connections?
So boats and traveling via the sea is the only logical explanation?
Isn't it?
filmtajm35 o
It is not about Europeans and Asians. It is about groups such as Aryan: Afghan, Indian, Caucasian, Slav, Germanics, Latins; Semites: Arabs, Ethiopians, Jews, Maltese, Somalis; Turkic: Kazakh, Turks, Uyghurs, Turkmen, Uzbeks; Uralic: Magyars, Estonians, Finns; No one should base it on modern culture separating Africans, Asians, Europeans, Amerindians...
Sir George Severn
From the way I understand it, we have a couple of main categories; such as Caucasians, Africans etc; with sub-categories beneath those.
And it is valid to refer to people both as their respective main or sub category.
*****
Those minor differences are actually quite significant, and should not be underestimated.
All it takes is a small change for you to potentially be born with brain damage or some other debilitating disease.
***** "Both are actually pretty stupid if you step back and look at it objectively"
"the point I'm really trying to drive home is that we shouldn't treat people differently based on minute differences like skull shape."
That's as subjective as you can get, so don't talk about seeing things objectively when the first thing you do is to insert your feelings, emotions and moral into a subject. What we get from your comment is: "For me, those differences are insignificant, because we shouldn't threat people differently, and you're stupid (you said, it look at it)"
I was only arguing about the way you dealt with the issue.
Anyway, you should not ask me that when 0.01% of anything had been significant, because the answer is yes, in many things, and no, in many other things. And when you see that the difference with a chimp (according to some research less to others) is 1% and with a Denisovan is much less, then...
But, I'm sure that if neanderthals and other human species were alive today (or if they were resurrected somehow) many "anthropology and sociology" students would be saying the same thing. Because how much difference is difference enough to accept that there are differences?
I don't claim to know for sure about this, but for sure, it isn't professional this PC way of dealing with this subjects. It isn't objective/scientific at all.
*****
Look, I followed this thing since the 80's. Not academically, just reading scientific stuff I stumbled with this, again and again. And read many times (since then) about how scientists refused to even talk about race for fear of being called racist or of some outraged clown try to destroy his career just because not liking the stuff. And I still reading about that today. And you know since when things are like this? since the late 40's, because of nazis, offended people "banned race". Suddenly someone/some people decided that race means another thing and it's bad. And therefore we are not separated by races anymore. Or ethnics (depending how PC is the one who opine). It's been like that since then (and a 40's decision doesn't look lie "modern science"...). Then someone came with the absolute batshit crazy stuff of "social constructions". And now with more precise studies and deeper knowledge they are leaning towards race again, that's the last (sorry I can't find now the publications, are not easy to find but I read 3 from last year and 2 from this one) "trend", and that's modern science... But anyway there is still debate among scientists about this subject so, no one can claim that "modern science" is in his/her opinion's side. When there's concesus then yes. And the great problem with PC people is that they are so prone to silence opposing or different ideas...
Searching I just found this, it seems to be interesting kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/why-both-sides-are-wrong-in-the-race-debate/
Sorry for my english, I hope it wasn't too difficult to read.
Awesome video 💕. Huge fan from the UK 💕