Thanks for this map. People will understand the story much better now. I have been telling this story for a long time, but it is much better on You-tube. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@geonomad1 i have been telling this story for ages. My main sources were from the Genome Project, with "DEEP ANCESTRY INSIDE THE GENOGRAPHIC PROJECT" by Spencer Wells. The Landmark DNA Questions Decipher Our Distant Past; and, " The Origins of the British" AND "The New Prehistory of Britain and Ireland from Ice Age Hunter Gatherers. to the Vikings, as revealed BY DNA Analysis" by Stephen Oppenheimer. Brilliant work!! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 It's cool. I think the place where our ancestors lived is significant. It is also interesting to explore the life of the people who lived on the site. I once read a paper that said that the genes of the people who founded Stone Henge are more than 90% different from the genes of those who have lived there since. I plan to make a video about this later as well.
@@geonomad1 That is right. The Geneticists and also those scientists who examine bones, found that many of the people at Stonehenge, had indications that they had grown up in Scotland. This was a revelation,- that people visited from so far away. The scientists found the evidence in the bones of the people buried at Stonehenge. They can find the evidence in the tiny amounts of residues from minerals in the bones of different people buried at Stonehenge found only in certain places in Scotland, which indicates they were brought up there. This meant that people that travelled, also had to bring their food from a long way away, and so they might well have taken their cattle with them all the way to the Henge. They would have had to kill or gather food as they travelled, as well. When they got to the Henge they would have slaughtered the cattle for the feast for many people. This makes sense. T here were no trains or buses for the people or the cattle. It was a long journey. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Excellent! Excellent! Excellent! This should be “mandatory” teaching in all schools. This is what these platforms should be used for, showing how we are all related.
PARTICULARLY, IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS, INSTEAD OF WITHHOLDING IT FROM BLACK CHILDREN. THEY WOULD RATHER TELL THEM ABOUT COLUMBUS {WHO DID NOT "DISCOVER" JACK, EVEN HAVE A NATIONAL HOLIDAY FOR THE FRAUD}, THE ALL WHITE PRESIDENTS {EXCEPT OBAMA}, HISTORY OF THEIR HERITAGE, AND ALL OF THE TRUE, ORIGINAL KINGS AND QUEENS, {NOT ONE MENTION OF ANY OF THEM. ATLAS, THIS WILL ALL BE REVEALED IN DUE TIME................MOST WILL BE SHOCKED!!!
I agree. It should be mandatory. But you would absolutely have a contingent of Bible-thumping racists and white supremacists fighting against it. Fox News would lump it in as "CRT" and it would become a culture war issue immediately. Remember when they tried teaching evolution in schools? The same bullsh*t crowd would whine and cry like snowflakes about it. When reality doesn't conform to their stupid, unscientific beliefs, they throw hissy fits to get their way. That's who they are and that's who they will always be.
This should be taught in schools perhaps history and biology as well as social studies to show how closely we are related to each other. The Human race is one big family.🕊👍
american natives and indo europeans both originated from the same source ANE populations (one of the reason why some fossils in Asia and America have been falsely identified like Mal'ta kid) even oldest populations with blond hair ever found are ancestors of American natives (afontova gora,siberia ) do you really think that europeans and native americans are related after 20 000 years?
Lol you do realize that even brothers can hate each others? Stop being naive and infantile. Human beings are ferocious , we need to be pragmatic and realistic.
Hello from Yakutia (North East Siberia) to our relatives in Americas. We, people of Yakutia managed to survive in one of the coldest places on Earth during Ice Age together with cattle and horses, and still surviving today.
@@lordcommandernox9197, The Russians who invested in the development of the culture and language of the Yakuts for most of the history of their existence inside Russia: 😮😮😮
@@white-bellycat8245 Sure they did, they invested heavily in meddling in their affairs, exactly like they like to criticize others for doing because Russia expanded into other people's lands as an Imperialistic nation. Inuits are related to Yakuts, not Moscovites. Russia constructed Railways so they could send their military in faster to stomp any rebelions, and they would use the excuse of development to massively deport natives and replace them with European Russians. Where are the Tatars now?
This is the very best migration simulation I have ever watched. It didn't dumb it anything down. I see that GeoNomad has videos focused on specific migrations and (unless I missed it) I can't wait to see a video focusing on migration into and throughout the Americas that was briefly touched on (excellently) in this comprehensive video.
@@geonomad1 When you do I will be watching it with great interest. I know there's a lot of requests in these feeds - I think that's a real testament to how effective and original your videos are. Really well done.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
Science never ceases to amaze me. Humans can accomplish so much when we study deeply. Too bad our world is run by people who don’t think like scientists.
@@Eyes-of-Horus People do not realise that geneticists went to Africa many times to look at the genes of Africans. (Of course, Africans were the first humans to successfully come out of Africa and spread across the rest of the world, and they changes to suit the climate! We are all belonging to the HUMAN RACE. Our differences should not mask that.) What Geneticists did was look some more at African Genes and what they found they found was just as interesting as the genes from out of Africa. Some Humans there are extremely old and of course there are mutations which occur as many times as out of Africa. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Scientists are free to study deeply, though. It is just that you cannot feed yourself studying science without being financed by the powerful (e.g. politicians) and the wealthy (e.g. mega-corporations). The wealthy tend to avoid funding research when it could cause to lose their money. And those who are willing to lose their money are funding it to advance their ideology. Politicians tend to use scientists for political and ideological gain. People like scientists, but the moment they are used as puppets of the powerful and the rich, they will feel that the real science is manipulated to suit the wants of the powerful and the rich instead of seeking the truth.
@@retrictumrectus1010 The Genealogists, whose studies I read quite A LONG TIME AGO NOW, are: "DEEP ANCESTRY The Genographic Project" which took a long time to complete all over the world, by taking actual genetic samples from people all over the world, was written by Spencer Wells; and "Out of Eden" -the peopling of the world; and also, "EDEN IN THE EAST" by Stephen Oppenheimer, were just two books revealing the long collecting of genes, from all over the world called the Genome Project. It was conducted by scientists who even went as far as the Pacific Ocean, to the far flung Pacific islands, and found out connections about cultures which had connections with the great floods mentioned in the Bible and the original stories about two brothers which affected the religions of the Levant and also the Sumerians, before they came from a place we are not sure of yet, driven there because of a flood! We know now that these floods happened all over the world, and was caused by a warm period which melted the ice and actually caused floods all over the world. America was affected badly and the evidence of immense flooding in the landscape of the Americas is also factual. Ice in the polar regions have regularly burgeoned and melted over many millennia, and all the regions of the world with human have recorded these in many places. The GENOME PROJECT had to be financed, but not by prejudiced people. Scientists went out to find the facts, which are that humans were born in Africa, and then went out of Africa, approximately 75,000 years ago when the world's polar regions had sucked up much of the ocean; which meant there was a lot more land visible to walk upon, and less ocean; and as the first colonists, these Africans' bodies and skin, adapted to a range of different climates, as they slowly explored the planet and went to the whole of the rest of the world. It is a marvellous exploration and very exciting and marvellous, and it is part of Human Ancient History. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
I took a 23&me test, which opened my mind to this studies. I am from Puerto Rico, and I’m adopted. No clue about biological parents. Despite I may look European, I was certain that I must had three different races in me, European, African and Native American. But I was not so sure about the Taino heritage (Native American from the Caribbean), since I was told that the Europeans exterminated them, and just a few puertorricans may still have some DNA traces. I took the 23&me test and guess what, I not only have all three races on me, of course European dominates, that’s why I look white from the Mediterranean, but I was so happy to find my haplo group is A2 which is a variant from A. Also understanding how all humans (homophobia sapiens sapiens) come from the same woman from Eastern Africa. She is the real Eve, and that makes us all brothers and sisters.
European, African and Native American = natives are all BLACK who deleted my answers = when this is clearly facts. YOU HAVE 3 LOCATION IN YOU not 3 races. "white from the Mediterranean" is not a thing = Ask any the Romans. or ask America why they are reluctant to add Spain + Italy to the "white people category" YOU CANNOT USE HOLLYWOOD CASTING AS REAL HISTORY 👸🏾👑Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (Sophia Charlotte; 19 May 1744 - 17 November 1818) was Queen of Great Britain and of Ireland as the wife of King George III BUT SHE was from a Germany Royal Family. Blacks were ruling Germany & UK in the same timeframe USA was being founded so in 200 years they systematically white-washed Earth history. The notion that white is Europe is false. CaucASIAN WHEN columbus landed in the Caribbean he said he met copperskin people. nothing about chinese looking bitches ( AmerIndians are not the natives.) Awaraks are black if Mansa sail from Africa to the Americas to rule over a kingdoms ...what are the chances they are also blacks here --- you cant be Spanish culture and African culture Spain culture is Moorish culture + and Moors are from West Africa. = you dont have 2 races of culture you have 2 location of culture
@@fivestar000 its too LATE NOW for all of that. RACE will continue, even if we know better. 1492 is in reverse: and you cant "we human" now because power is about to switch back.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
This mtDNA distribution map as well as every other such map ever made leaves one with the impression that there is more genetic diversity outside Africa than within Africa, which is actually opposite to reality. The one L branch all non-Africans descend from (L3) gets a detailed examination and an A to Z color-coded type classification which the other L branches that remained within Africa do not get (L0 to L6). In fact most of the L3 branch is in Africa, L3 has seven equidistant descendants: L3a, L3b'f, L3c'd, L3e'i'k'x, L3h, M, N. Five are African, while two are associated with non Africans. .So 6 out of 7 of the human mtDNA branches are completely ignored because it is within Africa and not deemed worthy of expansion and only a small fraction (two seventh, 2⁄7) of the 7th branch is represented. So we are actually looking at less than 4% of the human family tree.. There are more ethnic groups in Africa than the rest of the world combined. There are over 3,000 different ethnic groups speaking more than 2,100 different languages in Africa. And Africa will account for more than half of the world’s population growth by 2050. Nigeria alone is forecast to overtake China in total population size before the end of this century. So this is a population that should not be ignored. poemusart.com/poemusart/en/index/EgyptsLamentpart1/index.php
That's a good point. It was not intentionally ignored. There is not enough information about the remaining genes in Africa, and it is not well-reported because it is under-studied. After studying a little more, I will try to make an episode about migration in Africa.
The enormity of the study. Who do we thank for all this information. Certainly, all the biologists and scientists. But we are thankful for channels like yours, for simplifying it all. A big thank you sir
@@nikhilgoradia8949 the Quran says the same thing... Al-Baqarah 2:213 كَانَ النَّاسُ اُمَّةً وَّاحِدَةً ۟ فَبَعَثَ اللّٰهُ النَّبِيّٖنَ مُبَشِّرِيْنَ وَمُنْذِرِيْنَ ۪ وَاَنْزَلَ مَعَهُمُ الْكِتٰبَ بِالْحَقِّ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فِيْمَا اخْتَلَفُوْا فِيْهِ ؕ وَمَا اخْتَلَفَ فِيْهِ اِلَّا الَّذِيْنَ اُوْتُوْهُ مِنْۢ بَعْدِ مَا جَآءَتْهُمُ الْبَيِّنٰتُ بَغْيًۢا بَيْنَهُمْ ۚ فَهَدَي اللّٰهُ الَّذِيْنَ اٰمَنُوْا لِمَا اخْتَلَفُوْا فِيْهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ بِاِذْنِهٖ ؕ وَاللّٰهُ يَهْدِيْ مَنْ يَّشَآءُ اِلٰي صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيْمٍ Mankind was [of] one religion [before their deviation]; then Allah sent the prophets as bringers of good tidings and warners and sent down with them the Scripture in truth to judge between the people concerning that in which they differed. And none differed over it [i.e., the Scripture] except those who were given it - after the clear proofs came to them - out of jealous animosity among themselves. And Allah guided those who believed to the truth concerning that over which they had differed, by His permission. And Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
Its so weird how long the journey was to colonize madagascar. A native of the island is more closely related to an asian than a south or east african who live right off the coast that part blew my mind
@@geonomad1 nor true. "Ricaut's group has shown that the Malagasy genetic diversity is 68 percent African and 32 percent Asian. Based on their evidence, the Banjar were the most probable Asian population that traveled to Madagascar. The genetic dating supports the hypothesis that this Austronesian migration occurred around 1,000 years ago, while the last significant Bantu migration to Madagascar began 300 years later, perhaps following climate change in Africa. " took it from a science paper
They're still uncovering info on Proto Indo European languages. After several decades, the first of several of these languages has been deciphered, so, a little more info there. 🎉 I don't think it will be much longer before they have a more detailed map.
Are you not Polynesian? Coz I am Maori and I've known my whole life that we all originated in Taiwan, our whole race has always known where we came from
@@sendit1924 Yes so am I. But I'm Samoan from the old triangle of Fiji, Tonga, and, Samoa. We weren't as isolated as the Maori were once they established the magnificent culture in Aotearoa. Language wise you'll be able to follow migrations. We have Solomon Island, Vanuatu, and, Papua New Guinea in our roots. Follow the Lapita Pottery culture that ends on my Island. Down to my village, archeologists have discovered shards of pottery. I think they got tired of pottery breaking, and, went with wooden bowls aka Tanoas.
It doesn't add up. Science can always be boiled down to simple logic, if the theory is true we should see generations getting lighter or darker from living in hot/cold climates. If the change is as dramatic as an African to an Englishman or Chinese person, we should be able to detect the slight changes even in far shorter amounts of time, same goes for facial and bone structure.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
An important fact is that The polar regions at the time had sucked up masses of ocean, and the beach to the right or East of Yemen was a beach, because the ocean was a lot lower. This enabled humans to walk up the beach and also drink fresh water from streams that came out of the cliffs. When the humans reached what we call the Persian Gulf; then, it was a river not a sea, and there was a lot more land. Jeff Rose thinks that it might have been a paradise with other islands, and before it reached the Indian Ocean, fresh water and beautiful animals and palm trees laden with fruits were in this place. It might have been that place we now call Paradise, and we remembered this, and put it in our memory. The world was different all over, because of less Ocean and more land exposed by the Polar Ice. There was a lot more land exposed, that Humans could walk on, such as the top part of AUSTRALIA which came almost up to the top of Indonesia, and joined Papuan New Guinea. This helped humans to get to where they eventually went. We cannot imagine how and when Humans went unless we know what the state of the Oceans and Land was like at the time Humans came out of Africa., and we have worked out most of the states of the historical Polar regions, and when they burgeoned and when they melted. It makes a huge different to where and when Humans discovered different parts of the world. See the works of Jeffrey Rose.
Cynthia I cannot thank you enough for your comment,I have been fascinated with this topic for the past year now and was wondering where to begin with it all,I will check out the Work of the individual u mentioned, again, thanks for ur words!🙏
@@reggieknight5208 Also, "Deep Ancestry-inside the Genographic Project", by Spencer Wells; which took nine years to realise, looking at human beings' genes all over the world. It revealed that we are all human beings linked up genetically with each other. Male genes are separate from Female ones and therefore their journey is different from one another. This often reveals that men took their women to the parts of the world they wanted then to go. There are many other authors, such as Graham Hancock, of "Out of Eden", which goes into a lot of detail. I was fascinated. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 My favorite is Graham Hancok. His theory about the Great Pyramid alignment with the Stars of (Constellation) Orion is quite fascinating for me.
Racism can be about color of skins, hair or eyes. But there definite cultural differences as well that may have helped with rascist reactions. If Africans had developed similar clothing, big ships, schools, permanent large housing, gun like weapons, then it would be simply skin, hair and eyes. But the Europeans had no respect for nearly clothesless, nonreading, nonwriting, mud and wood villages and people using simple spears or bows. Too easy to make the people into "others" mentally. Others that can be used. I believe this is the start of racism. But in reality, the English fought the French, the Germans, Italians, Spanish, Russians, Danish, Norwegians, etc, and to me these all share the similar lighter skins and hair color ranges. We humans can define people as "others" and therefore a lesser group of people so easily. And others can become sacrifices to my own groups betterment. (Not "my group"...just an example of the speaking). Econmic or class issues reflect this same creation of "others". Humans are sickening in some ways.
This vid is so well done. I wish there was more content like this. I'm curious about all the extinct branches with no living decedents. Also, is it possible that the odd distribution of haplogroups represents different migration waves that may have followed similar routes but separated by hundreds of thousands of years?
@@jonmurrs7068 well we found hominid fossils 1.8 million years old and called them homos. The oldest anatomically modern sapiens (includes cromagnion usually) weve found are around 200,000 years old so yeah i think its fair to say human evolution goes back way farther than our oldest buildings or written records.oldest buildings and written records are less than 10,000yrs old What i was saying is that different groups can migrate along the same routes at different times, so the genes and cultures look totally different but they're from the same places.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
There were Homo sapiens who tried to leave Africa before this group, but they didn’t survive. One was dated as old as 300k years ago that was found in Europe. They were most likely killed by Neanderthals in territory fights, like we would with an invader. The last group had more sophisticated “weapons” that were more advanced than what the Neanderthals had. That’s why they no longer exist. The Neanderthal DNA in our DNA most likely represents a few babies saved who were raised with the Homo sapiens than any peaceful co-mingling and co-marrying. We would see Homo sapien DNA in their DNA from the previous encounters if that was the case and we don’t.
The super early migration of those early humans - over the fucking open ocean - to Australia is mind blowing. It's almost as if people came out from Africa and just headed for Bondi Beach. They lived there for over 60k years before Europeans came along and nearly wiped them out. And their culture stretches back to the earliest times - they can still read and interpret these days the rock art and paintings from way back then .
@@Haunt888it’s complete nonsense, but they actively rewrite history every day. Even their “dot painting” art is a lie - it was invented by a Dutch anthropologist in the 1960s who was documenting Aboriginal culture. They had no art to speak of so he invented it. True story, look it up.
That's absolutely 'not' historical facts, your statement is "mind blowing"! It is not possible that they walked on water, they can only have crossed via the land bridge (under 50k years ago), they had no boats nor any skills at creating any practical transportation! The first boats (verified) they ever saw were brought by Zambians fishing around Australia, who traded a couple of them! 🧐
Ender7j Yes they never mention that the world map was rather different as the Ice age has sucked up a lot of ocean and the Yemini coast was exposed and had fresh water gushing out of the cliffs, which would have helped the First explorers from Africa to not die of thirst, and also there were plenty of mussels to eat on their journey. Australia, had a lot more land exposed in the north so that there was only ten short miles to paddle to Australia from the Torres Straights in Indonesia. Cynthia McLaglen
@@tutonguni529 yes Topology was very different, and the sea was much lower all around the world. In the future, as it has done before, the sea will rise and much land will disappear. That is quite a difficult thought to deal with. Cynthia Allen McLAGLEN
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
It's why everyone on Earth looks like a tone shade of Ethiopians. Complexion phenotype. Equatorial hot sun darker melanin, to away from Equator keratin, and lesser melanin. This documentary is *THE* *BEST* . It *truly* explains Humanity.
@@bettyschneider5268 All that mischief women have caused and men still keep them around?? IMO everyone better thank their lucky stars that men are too gullible, romantic and desperately horny to give up on women altogether yet and would rather tolerate or navigate some truly dumb behavior just to keep their lady friends around
@@commander57 Seriously, even here in the UK many American women just out themselves as being unnecessarily bitchy, everyone in the world is starting to take notice of this stereotype lol, I guess they call them Karens lmaoo
@@mebansharaisantasticokhong7312 I wouldn't call it that like africa it is hot on average and geography and climate makes it a perfect place for pathogens to spread not to mention carriers like mosquitos This is one of the reasons despite it being cold more colder climate reigons are also found in some ways also more habitable for living since it is harder for pathogens to spread and thrive
@@raibhansjadhavrsj6352 very high popullation and class system was there even before british life in indias countries was not good compared to europe people just fool themselves to believing that british might made things worse in certain ways but in no ways was india a paradise before colonisation started
Guy, they stated they started from South Africa??? Yes, Africa has the most diverse genetic variation among all humans, including more genetic variation than the rest of the world combined. This variation is useful for understanding Africa's demographic history, including when populations increased in size, contracted, migrated, or admixed. A 2009 study that sampled the bloodlines of more than 100 distinct populations in remote valleys and mountaintops found that Africans are more genetically diverse than the rest of the world combined. The study also suggests that the center of origin for modern humanity is the southwestern coast of Africa, around the border between Namibia and South Africa.
Too bad we won't be here to see humans migrate out into space and into other solar systems. Thousands of years from now, there might be many different human species or humanoid species(like in Star Trek) that evolved from humans. We may never find other intelligent life out there, but maybe we will be the seed that creates all different types of aliens species.
I know this is old but as I watched this I thought how cool would it be if the geologic changes of time were also reflected at the same time as the migrations occurred. You’d be able to see when ocean drop affected migration, or the drying up of the Mediterranean Sea, or the greening of the Sahara or the ice bridge between Siberia and America. I actually think leaving that out is a disservice to the representation of the data.
I totally agree with you by the way that this would be a revolutionary visualization if it were created. The size of such a project would be absolutely enormous. A geologist named Christopher Scotese out of U of Arizona (IIRC?) spent 30 years developing the research and investing the time to create detailed maps of the deep geologic history of the Earth with updates every 10 million years going back to the start of the Paleozoic (~500ish million years ago). It's absolutely brilliant work, but it is the result of a lifetime of research and dedication. I suspect we have the data to do the deep geologic history of the Holocene with more granularity, but again, the time to compile such things is enormous. It is painstaking work. And of course, there is a significant amount of uncertainty within all of these measurements. One of the errors we make in interpreting work like this is to fail to appreciate that it could be very wrong simply because of the physical limits of the measurements upon which all of this is ultimately based. However, I do think it would be enlightening for people to understand just how incredibly dynamic this planet is. We make the assumption that it is static and things don't change. They do, constantly, and often violently so, and as mere shades upon this planet, we humans simply adapt as best as we can.
Maybe if you believe "out of Africa" is anything more than what it is.... a theory. Brown skinned people are indigenous to the planet. That's why we don't disintegrate in the sun. THE PLANET. Not Africa. All they have is theories. No truths.
Yte people weren't here.... how in tf would they know?? We already know that they cannot be trusted to tell the truth about ANYTHING. Why believe this bullshit.
@@derekhough-jm9gc Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂 You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! " You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
I am so curious about the details of the migration. Did they move constantly at any point or was it mostly just a few miles per generation? Did any groups attempt long distance journeys in a single lifetime? What is the distance per year of ground covered, on average? I have so many questions!
Jared Diamond kind of goes over this in his book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel". Even if humans only migrate a few miles per year, we would cover continents within a thousand years. For example, from the US Canada border to the lowest point of South America is approximately 8,000 miles. If various human tribes only migrated 8 miles per year, it would only take them 1,000 years to reach the lowest point of South America. Given that hunter gatherer tribes move much more than 8 miles a year, this is trivial. Pre-agricultural tribes would have had to constantly be on the move, not only to hunt and forage, but to avoid other tribes' territory as well. I would assume some tribes moved hundreds of miles a year if necessary. Some tribes were likely based on terrain and would have moved around certain rivers, lakes, beaches, oceans, climates, forests, animals, agricultural sites etc. Whichever niche the tribes specialized in were how they migrated. Depending on the niche (such as agriculture or easy prey) they could become overcrowded which would lead to conflict, and would have to migrate further out.
People came out of India. They had originally come from Africa. No one knows how long this took, but people have to eat and create cover in order to live so they would have settled for a long time in the place they had found until some of them went to explore again. From India they went to the Indonesian Islands and ended up near the Torres Straits. At that time the sea was much lower and there was only about ten miles to a piece of land jutting north from Australia. The group split and one half went on to Thailand and all the lands further north, and the other half went to Australia. Maybe that is why some Amerindians find an Australian connection, actually from the ancient people from India. The ones that went north were there spreading around all the countries which of course did not exist then, as named countries. Then eventually some of the people decided to explore Beringia and ending up in a very cold America. They spread everywhere and also kept going south. Many would have been affected by the time when the ice melted, which created the most horrific floods and geologist say that these floods affect can still be seen geologically and would have killed many people and animals long ago when this happened. Eventually the land and its people and animals recovered, and lived in peace with their animals. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
My ancestors traveled very slow.Once arrived in Central Asia,it took them 50,000 years to rich Europe.I know this for sure because i participated in the Human Genome Project.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
My interest is mainly with Indigenous Australians. I have read that the habitation of Australia started as much as 60,000 years ago as dating of fossils has indicated. Your excellent video would say it was more like 50,000-45,000 years ago, is there some more specific info that can narrow down these dates? Also could there be Denisovan DNA in Australian Aboriginals?
I am related to the original African Manju (L3) AS ALL THE FEMALES OUT OF AFRICA ARE. Manju (L3) kept mutating as we all do from time to time, and after producing a few more Haplogroups in India her kind went to Indonesia and then at the Torres Straights two groups split up, Cain ( M130) went to the North towards Thailand and another Cain and Manju made a dug out canoe and went to Australia, as it was only 10 miles away at that time, due to an ice ages sucking up the sea and revealing more land at the north of Australia. So the lady that made me also made Australian ethnic ladies!! Cynthia McLaglen
L3 Manju came out of Africa to India. She is my ancestor, and she created many other Haplogroups within India. She, and I mean a lot of her in the form of human beings, moved to Indonesia and then to Australia with her companion Cain(L50) who is also in Australia, today. So she is my ancestor and the ancestor of Australian Native women and also women still found in India today! She is my African Hero! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
5:27 600,000, should be 60,000 "The M and N types which left India SIXTY thousand years ago" Not "Six hundred thousand" Its a great video, I'm only mentioning this for young students.
That is a short time frame for a great deal of minor mutations to present such general differences. Wonder how slow or fast we are mutating, adapting, to the changes around us today. A resilient and persistent species.
Well you are not the first to ask that question. There has been a study of Australian Aborigine's who's population got splintered about 3000 years ago. The genetic divergence has been surprisingly fast. Today the rate of mutation is far lower because there is a lot of mingling of genes. You really only get a lot of mutation when you have an isolated population
We can already see within a couple of generation the height of the average Japanese or Chinese has increased. That's only in the last 50 years. What affect all the chemicals that we ingest as a species will have on us in a 1000 years for example?!
I read somewhere that it takes 20 thousand years for a given black population to become white (or opposite), by living in cold climate, reproducing only among themselves, without mixing with others.
@@zazu9117 from the birth of Christianity to today only 2000 years. with the movement of population, changes in diet, environment...i am guessing that the evolution of the human species will be more rapid than ever. What used to take 20K years might take just 1000 years now.
The minor mutations are just that: minor mutations. White skin in Europeans comes from Middle-Eastern Neolithic farmers who essentially replaced the relatively dark-skinned (think Inuits) European hunter-gatherers and now about half of European ancestry is from them. Europeans today have little genetic ancestry from the hunter-gatherers who first lived there
People with the oldest dna are the San communities of Southern Africa and the second oldest dna markers are the Aboriginal Australians, which means their ancestors are the first people to have move across the globe.
I’m TANZANIAN an I’m proud of this🥰🥰🥰 🇹🇿🇹🇿 🇹🇿 EastAfrica so I thought maybe Ethiopian they’re holly more than us 😩An now here we come 🇹🇿The first human being
It would be interesting if you could put names to some of these migrations. You mentioned the Aborigines of Australia, they apparently mated with Denisovians in Asia. I saw a TH-cam video about people who were pushed out of America and lived in Tiera Del Fuego as a remnant population - they dressed just like Australian Aborigines and had similar shelters. Then there is the big migration of Indo Europeans from the Caspian Sea.
The people of Tiera Del Fuego did have Aboriginal Australian admixture. Unfortunately, Christian missionaries brought disease & death as usual wiped them out. The few remaining survivors who were children were raised in the missionary & no choice but to have mixed race children cause there isn’t anymore of their people left. The last 2 unmixed survivors have already passed away by now. Catholic Church is Satanic.
@@geonomad1 ,the aborigines of australia came with the first great migration out of africa,there were another two great migration waves.....So this first wave could have made it to the americas.....then mixed and got pushed out by new migration waves,abit like the neanderthal......
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history of tamil people history
The Native Australians could not have mated with Denisovans in Asia, because the route was from India to the Torres Strait! Have you ever met a Native Australian? When they saw European men coming out of the bush according to a working scientist in Australia, I knew, they said they stanck from their sweaty cloths that they had word for days, and the clothes, smelt like rotting flesh! That was the first impression that the Australian Aborigines had of white men! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Wonderful. Can you please trace the Jarawa tribe's journey - as they have no Neanderthal mtDNA...which their neighbors do have, along with most other humans.... Please trace the humans with the oldest mtDNA and probably culture as well...
A map drawn by Family Tree DNA shows a direct line from Africa to North America. It starts in Africa a C, splits with a line toward Australia, and ends in North America as C3. The line is yellow. Q is a different line drawn in brown. C3 did not extend to South America like Q. Not much connections between C3 and Q, but I am sure there were some. C traveled mostly by sea. Q traveled mostly by land. I wonder how different that was, as far as hunting goes. Q had to deal with a lot of predators. Sharks were the only predators endangering C. C had to deal with a lot of storms and wild seas.
The narrator made an error; he said: "The M and N types which left india 600 000 years ago..." should have been 60 000 years ago, as shown in the subtitles. It is understood that he meant to say that, since the progenitors of those early Indians left Africa about 200 000 years ago. However, Creationists will be quick to lash on to that statement in an effort to discredit science and evolution.
If I might make a negative observation, the 'chatty' style of the script ("Will you not follow along with me..?" "Thanks for watching for a long time", etc.) doesn't really come off when combined with the digitized narration. I can never understand why videos like this do not use a human - narrated soundtrack - a competent narrator could surely be found who would undertake the job without charging an exorbitant fee. I have rather come to suspect the fear is that the narrator's voice and accent, _wherever_ s/he were from, would get up somebody's nose, somewhere. The solution that would have been used in the past, to have the speaker use *'received pronunciation',* or the US equivalent, something like in those old War Office training films - "Having completed their run - in, the Bombardier opens the bomb - bay doors at aiming point 'baker' and calls 'Bombs Away' "... (Or the Civilian version thereof) wouldn't work today, the almost contrived 'anti - accent' being taken for an accent in its own right. And _most certainly_ have ethnic associations! ...Yes, I think I'm beginning to see the nature of the problem. I don't think there would be that much difficulty in the other direction, not nowadays. The days when BBC Home Counties (London Area) listeners rebelled at hearing a Scottish Accented presenter coming over the airwaves are _surely_ in the past. Are we not all grown - up enough to see no issue with a clearly enunciated speaker from _anywhere_ narrating or presenting a video? I suppose that would be naïve. A video about the war in Ukraine with *either* a Russian _or_ a Ukrainian presenter would obviously be bringing difficulties down on our heads! That much, I suppose, is understandable. Perhaps less seriously, would a video narrated in 'Ebonics' be acceptable? On a generalist channel? Perhaps we need _more_ videos narrated 'in' Ebonic?! I feel that the question today is almost the opposite, that producers worry about the issue of "Middle - Class White Man 'taint' "(all White men being, of course, Middle Class, by default!) when making decisions about narration; either in the sense of it being an _actual_ *thing,* - at all costs to be avoided in the interests of social justice... or an invented thing, to be avoided at all costs in the interests of keeping the hounds off one's back! I do see a case for it occasionally being a legitimate source for concern in a video about, say, (to use an obvious example) colonisation. But I have to admit to perceiving it as, essentially, a made~y up~py thing. But then, I _am_ White! At the end of the day though, I can't see why it's not possible to just reduce the problem to it's bare essentials. Do you have a decent voice? Can you read? Do you have a basic grasp of this subject? "Hello, can someone phone James Earl Jones' agent? Is Roger Moore still working? The post - boy; *He* has a nice voice, doesn't he? What is so difficult about all this?!!"
Thanks for the sincere advice. As the channel grows a little more, I plan to ask a good narrator. Right now, we don't have enough budget to gather materials and produce for episode production. However, I will do my best to make a better video under the current conditions.
@@geonomad1 Speaking generally, the videos are just fine, I didn't see anything to take issue with, other than 'The Voice' - which wasn't something I would have been "All up in a heap about", to be fair; though that said, it's obvious that I'm not the only person 'annoyed' by the digital narration, one viewer even making the point that they would prefer an actual human voice - *your* actual voice, however *'weird'!* than some text - to - speech gizmo! I do appreciate that it's difficult, more difficult than most people are aware, to speak at length without getting tongue - tied, having to clear one's throat, needing to take a sip of water, etc, etc. - but no - one expects these things to be done (in) "One take, from the top!" either. Even a (mild) speech impediment need not be an, _erm..._ *'impediment'* as long as the material is intelligible. Sadly it is true that there are a lot of 'jerks' out there on the net, but it seems as if, once it is _explained_ to viewers that what they are hearing is _not_ an affectation, or an 'accent', people seem to be fine about it! By way of example, there is a chap by the name of Isaac Arthur who has that "Awound the wugged wock, the wagged wascal wan" - thing going on with his speech, but it doesn't seem, in any way, to cause any problems with him having an extremely interesting - and popular - podcast ("Science and Futurism", a highly speculative, but always science grounded, series about subjects like Man's future amongst the Stars, The Existence or Non - Existence of Aliens, and so on.) However, I didn't come back here to 'push' other people's channels, or to rehash arguments I already made in my previous comment. I really just wished to say that because what you put out on screen is very polished - *not* 'slick', by any means, but polished, I had rather assumed, therefore, that the channel had considerable resources at its disposal. I am guessing that really quite impressive results may be possible with the use of 'off - the - shelf' apps and tools, but with my untutored eye, I had believed, such were the production values, that your videos had been built, painstakingly (and expensively) 'from the ground up', as it were. If they were not, this does not take anything away from your videos, rather it is to your credit that they have an an overall air of professionalism in their production _anyway,_ achieved with the judicious use of the assets that you _do_ have to hand. I find this sort of material very interesting and as a secondary school (ie high school) graduate in my 50's, I tend to regard myself as 'smart', though to be sure, no 'brainbox' (and notwithstanding the fact that intelligence is a bit like driving ability or ability in bed; it's not too often one comes across someone who admits to having _less_ than average ability in that arena, a logical impossibility!)... as such, I appreciate material that is intellectually stimulating, but that doesn't assume too much and thereby leaving me floundering, although I admit to finding the minutiae of some of the haplogroup 'stuff' hard work. As such, though, I am very much 'in your hands' in a field which is assailed on all sides by political, idealogical and pseudoscientific interests. Indeed, in my original comment, I may well have come across as having an identitarian axe to grind... I hope not, but if so let me stress it was purely defensively motivated in an environment that is _poison_ with that kind of stuff. In as much as I _did_ have a 'bee in my bonnet', it was with regard to my quibbles about the lack of human narration, *and in no way* about the material itself! Having noted your response, I now believe that in that regard (ie, the narration), at least as it applied to _your_ video, I was being perhaps a little bit paranoid! As far as the subject goes though - the origins of man and his (or her!!) travels around the World... I trust you. I'm in your hands here, being forced to bow to your expertise. But without wishing to sound overly full of myself - to have ones trust nowadays in such contentious fields is no little thing, *nor* a thing to be taken lightly. As such, I have been pleased to subscribe and look forward to the continuing enlightenment and education I'm sure your channel will bring me. MY SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR MEANDERING ON AT SUCH EXCESSIVE LENGTH. As much as I struggle to keep these things concise, I'm not there yet!
@@geonomad1 I agree with the last two comments, two of my fav youtubers have terrible voices, one is a sci fi channel and he has a major lisp and cant even pronounce 'earth' properly and the other is a volcanology channel has a nasily monotone voice, but they make the best videos have hundreds of thousands to millions of subscribers, because as with this video, its interesting and informative, will sub if you even try it yourself, but i personally absolutely hate the robot man voice.
Interesting theory. Cromagnon doesn't seem to have originated in sub saharan Africa however. Strange that this is omitted. Also, the idea that no humanoids set foot in the Americas prior to 10k BC is very hard to believe
@Talking Parameters the notion does seem to fly in the face of what I was taught of the scientific method. I suspect there are political forces influencing this one but what an unfortunate situation that would be for everyone. Not the first time however. We are uncovering new hominids faster than we can develop theories. This one is interesting but I think very unlikely
@@RichardMiller-tq6ut true lots of hominids being discovered. But modern humans didn't evolve from, for example the 2 million year old hominid found in China. All modern humans came from out of Africa.
@@aufumy imagine making a statement of fact when you know for certain you don't have complete evidence. Hasn't actual science found a way of nipping this type of behavior in the bud?
@A Historical Lens Lucy is 3.2 Million years ago, so first proto-human species were not just one type but many types, dozens as a matter of fact...But I believe this analysis needs to start much, much earlier, then it will all make much better sense! Also where the original human species first evolved from was not out in the savanna of East Africa, but in the jungles of the deep Congo region and further West even into what is now Cameroon, Gabon and along the great Congo River. This is the deep history of human evolution that is oftentimes overlooked. As an anthropologist looking at our evolution, I start the timeline back 5 to 7 million years ago (that's my Eve, a Proto Eve, even older than Lucy), and that the migrations out of Africa began 2 to 3 million years ago in migratory waves that were based upon the migrations of the animals we followed in accordance to the receding glacial periods. Please consider a deep history of our Proto human roots. This is not adequate in my eyes, especially considering Neanderthals lived up until 6,000 years ago and are in varying degrees in our DNA today for a reason. Let's go deeper in this timeline to our deep evolution and migrations and the melding of all the diverse forms of our species over time that create the unique diversity of our species today.
@Chroniclesof_Alicha Balaam; VidsbyAB perhaps. I suspect there is a large chapter we have yet to uncover, however. If our collective ancestor did reside in these areas, what did the less adventurous ones that stayed behind breed with? There is a missing "link" if you will that is puzzling. What of the ghost gene?
You are too dense to understand that these are tracing groups and not just individuals. Just because you find a trace of human activity does not mean that a group was there. Surely there were adventurous individuals just like today who had the balls to strike out on their own and return to tell the story. I dont understand why people have such a narrow view of how reality works.
You forgot type W. I saw it up there for a minute in the west Asia area of Israel but it didn’t show migration after that. I’m type W3a and my dna profile is primarily England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Switzerland and Iberian Peninsula.
@@geonomad1 it was getting a bit crowded. Lol. I was just curious and kind of double checking 23&me as they describe my haplogroup as Corded Ware people from the Steppes while, for the time W was visible, your video showed it more in the Israel/Jordan area.
Caustic Chameleon It is not important that your genes are from a particular Country. H, for Helena, K for Katrin, T for Tara, U for Ursula (the oldest female gene in Europe), and V or Vera are the most common female genes in Europe. Wanda is found in large quantities the North of Europe, but is also found all over Europe. Just look up "W" OR WANDA AT THE GENE MAPS FOR HER. Yes she is all over Europe. Obviously a popular girl! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 Quite likely it is not important to you. It is quite important to me. WTF is with the girl name thing. Do you need a pneumonic to remember them? I made a statement to the content creator not you. Your input is unnecessary and unwanted.
This is fascinating. How did some cultures see that mdna was 100% the true determination of familial ancestry. That is amazing knowledge for supposedly backwards, uneducated people. Seems they knew more than we did
It's now accepted that aboriginal Australian's first arrived on the mainland 65,000 years ago. A bit earlier than this timeline would suggest - but very close. Insane when you think about continuity of occupation and culture.
You mean they’ve basically done nothing for the past 65000 years? Still basically Stone Age people, despite no natural predators. How awesome. If Europeans didn’t come they’d still be primitive Stone Age people. What a waste of human intellect.
Aboriginal people are known to have occupied mainland Australia for at least 65,000 years. It is widely accepted that this predates the modern human settlement of Europe and the Americas. Extract form National Museum Australia.
200,000 years is greater than 65,000. Also we all go back to Lucy .....est 4 million years. So the Australian Black people didn't spring up there ..their ancestors came from Africa it's a slam dunk.
Who knows that, who are you quoting? That statement is utterly ridiculous! It is known, by qualified scientific research that a form of humans were present in Australia 40,000 years ago, it is also well known that they had wandered there from India via Indonesia and New Guinea to graze the land! Do not believe what the paid 'dreamers' tell you, actual proof suggests otherwise! 😏
Most scientists agree with these findings: *_1_* Humans originated in Africa. *_2_* There were between 15 to 20 species of early humans. *_3_* Ardi, _Ardipithecus ramidus,_ a female fossil excavated in 1994-97, has been isotopically dated at *_4.4 million_* years old. Move over, Lucy! (Lucy, _Australopithecus afarensis,_ a 3.2 million-year-old female fossil, was discovered in 1974 in Hadar, Ethiopia.) *_4_* The Neanderthal genome sequence published in 2010 showed interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans. *_5_* Current human beings are a subspecies: *_Homo sapiens sapiens._* 💕☮🌎🌌
We are Global African Indigenous people!! Love and Unity is the best key for us all together!!💯Also Giving thanks to the Great Mother's/Goddesses and Great Father's/Gods and the Ancestors and Guardians!! Saying from Snefer aka Bashiyr!!👸🏿🤴🏿
Me too Margaret, I don’t remember much except we’re related to Otzi the iceman in the Austrian/Italian alps. I’d like to learn the path before that too 😉
It is not the largest, and also the reason it looks smaller than usual is because they are using the mercator projection which makes everything away from the equator larger so it fits on a rectangular map better.
Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂 You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! " You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
Hate to break it to you, but there are dozens of confirmed radio carbon dates before 12 KYA al over North and South America, and up to 26 KYA. Your map is at least 7-10 thousand years off in the Americas, across the board.
Wheres the evidence wheres the proof? i always see people saying this but non of you give the evidence or source. Just qurious. Oldest that can be sure 100% is 14 500 years ago. Most of those older have been depunked or were controversial to begin with
You show New Zealand (Aotearoa) Maori and Hawaiian coming from Western Polynesia but they are Eastern Polynesians from The Cook Islands, Marquesas and Tahiti where the Easter Islanders also came from. Maori, Hawaiians, Easter Islanders (Rapanui) and those in Central East Polynesia share very similar languages and distinct from Western Polynesian languages (Tonga, Samoa etc) All Maori mythology also points to Eastern Polynesia as does the DNA evidence now. Rarotongans (Cook Islands) also have mythology about ancestors sailing to New Zealand and who also call themselves Maori
@@geonomad1 You're very welcome. The whole story of human migration is fascinating. I'm a New Zealander with a little Maori ancestry and taught NZ History. Polynesian navigation and migration is a story of highly advanced sailing techniques resulting in finding the last habitable lands on Earth. New Zealand (Aotearoa) is the very last except the Chatham Islands (Rekohu) settled first just 500 years ago from New Zealand, whose people became the Moriori and who were almost wiped out by Maori who arrived there in the 19th Century on English ships. The Moriori had a strong pacifist culture and couldn't bring themselves to even try to fight back such was the power of their belief.
@@geonomad1 Not really. Modern day "Africans" like the rest of humanity also descend from a population that is ancestral to all humans. “None of the principal African lineages are found in the Americas or in Australia. The vast majority of African nuclear and mitochondrial haplotypes is not present outside of Africa, which contradicts the definition of a founding haplotype.” - (University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology; 1998) In fact sub saharan Africans are part of the newest genetic variations and genetically much younger than "Eurasians" Haplogroup E, the dominant Y haplogroup in sub saharan Africa is Eurasian in origin while "African" A nor B haplogroups today are known to share CT alleles in CT defining sites, while mtdna L3 is more related to Eurasian haplogroups than to the most divergent African clusters L1 and L2. See Vicente M Cabrera et al "Carriers of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup L3 basal lineages migrated back to Africa from Asia around 70,000 years ago"
Bullshit. They don’t teach it in school because it’s an advanced subject. Children have more important things to learn. You can learn this in any university in the world, it’s not a secret.
0:17 "escape"? moving is very different from "escaping". Human moved out from Africa wave by wave, it's not escaped . People did not even know they were leaving "Africa".
Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂 You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! " You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
Y DNA A00 is from Cameroon according to scientists and is Older than L0. So the question is have they found the oldest Mitochondria DNA??? Is their an L00 out there?
thank you amazing video. I Perosnally think mtDNA A % B came into Americas form S.E. Asia/E Asia, becauase they are associated with dark skinned tropical populations in Asia and found mor ein Tropical Native Americans. While MtDNA C and D took not ice free route(recent modern reasarch discourages), Costal route boating through the rainfoest-raintundra was the only option...
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for this map. People will understand the story much better now. I have been telling this story for a long time, but it is much better on You-tube. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Thank you. I'm not good at English, but I'm glad it was helpful.
@@geonomad1 i have been telling this story for ages. My main sources were from the Genome Project, with "DEEP ANCESTRY INSIDE THE GENOGRAPHIC PROJECT" by Spencer Wells. The Landmark DNA Questions Decipher Our Distant Past; and, " The Origins of the British" AND "The New Prehistory of Britain and Ireland from Ice Age Hunter Gatherers. to the Vikings, as revealed BY DNA Analysis" by Stephen Oppenheimer. Brilliant work!! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 It's cool. I think the place where our ancestors lived is significant. It is also interesting to explore the life of the people who lived on the site. I once read a paper that said that the genes of the people who founded Stone Henge are more than 90% different from the genes of those who have lived there since. I plan to make a video about this later as well.
@@geonomad1 That is right. The Geneticists and also those scientists who examine bones, found that many of the people at Stonehenge, had indications that they had grown up in Scotland. This was a revelation,- that people visited from so far away. The scientists found the evidence in the bones of the people buried at Stonehenge. They can find the evidence in the tiny amounts of residues from minerals in the bones of different people buried at Stonehenge found only in certain places in Scotland, which indicates they were brought up there. This meant that people that travelled, also had to bring their food from a long way away, and so they might well have taken their cattle with them all the way to the Henge. They would have had to kill or gather food as they travelled, as well. When they got to the Henge they would have slaughtered the cattle for the feast for many people. This makes sense. T here were no trains or buses for the people or the cattle. It was a long journey. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Can you share the link to the channel
Excellent! Excellent! Excellent! This should be “mandatory” teaching in all schools. This is what these platforms should be used for, showing how we are all related.
It's wrong that's why
@@shable1436 please explain how it’s wrong???
PARTICULARLY, IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS, INSTEAD OF WITHHOLDING IT FROM BLACK CHILDREN. THEY WOULD RATHER TELL THEM ABOUT COLUMBUS {WHO DID NOT "DISCOVER" JACK, EVEN HAVE A NATIONAL HOLIDAY FOR THE FRAUD}, THE ALL WHITE PRESIDENTS {EXCEPT OBAMA}, HISTORY OF THEIR HERITAGE, AND ALL OF THE TRUE, ORIGINAL KINGS AND QUEENS, {NOT ONE MENTION OF ANY OF THEM. ATLAS, THIS WILL ALL BE REVEALED IN DUE TIME................MOST WILL BE SHOCKED!!!
@@twintopper8659 bravo!!!!
I agree. It should be mandatory. But you would absolutely have a contingent of Bible-thumping racists and white supremacists fighting against it. Fox News would lump it in as "CRT" and it would become a culture war issue immediately. Remember when they tried teaching evolution in schools? The same bullsh*t crowd would whine and cry like snowflakes about it. When reality doesn't conform to their stupid, unscientific beliefs, they throw hissy fits to get their way. That's who they are and that's who they will always be.
This should be taught in schools perhaps history and biology as well as social studies to show how closely we are related to each other. The Human race is one big family.🕊👍
american natives and indo europeans both originated from the same source ANE populations (one of the reason why some fossils in Asia and America have been falsely identified like Mal'ta kid)
even oldest populations with blond hair ever found are ancestors of American natives (afontova gora,siberia )
do you really think that europeans and native americans are related after 20 000 years?
@@curocurovic6675 I am Native American born in Canada.if we are human beings we are all related
I hope so too. thank you.
Lol you do realize that even brothers can hate each others? Stop being naive and infantile. Human beings are ferocious , we need to be pragmatic and realistic.
@@backintimealwyn5736 sure do thanks for the reminder!
Hello from Yakutia (North East Siberia) to our relatives in Americas. We, people of Yakutia managed to survive in one of the coldest places on Earth during Ice Age together with cattle and horses, and still surviving today.
Hello😊
Half of you dind't survive the Russians tho.
You guys should be a country, I would visit!
I’ve seen many videos about Yakutia and find your life fascinating and difficult, at least for me. Greetings!
@@lordcommandernox9197, The Russians who invested in the development of the culture and language of the Yakuts for most of the history of their existence inside Russia: 😮😮😮
@@white-bellycat8245 Sure they did, they invested heavily in meddling in their affairs, exactly like they like to criticize others for doing because Russia expanded into other people's lands as an Imperialistic nation.
Inuits are related to Yakuts, not Moscovites. Russia constructed Railways so they could send their military in faster to stomp any rebelions, and they would use the excuse of development to massively deport natives and replace them with European Russians. Where are the Tatars now?
This is the very best migration simulation I have ever watched. It didn't dumb it anything down. I see that GeoNomad has videos focused on specific migrations and (unless I missed it) I can't wait to see a video focusing on migration into and throughout the Americas that was briefly touched on (excellently) in this comprehensive video.
It will take some time, but I will read the relevant papers and prepare to write a video.
@@geonomad1 When you do I will be watching it with great interest. I know there's a lot of requests in these feeds - I think that's a real testament to how effective and original your videos are. Really well done.
@@geonomad1 please do a video on how black people turned white and Asian
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
Where's the link in the description to the map?
Science never ceases to amaze me. Humans can accomplish so much when we study deeply. Too bad our world is run by people who don’t think like scientists.
I think you should have stopped with "... by people who don't think."
@@Eyes-of-Horus People do not realise that geneticists went to Africa many times to look at the genes of Africans. (Of course, Africans were the first humans to successfully come out of Africa and spread across the rest of the world, and they changes to suit the climate! We are all belonging to the HUMAN RACE. Our differences should not mask that.) What Geneticists did was look some more at African Genes and what they found they found was just as interesting as the genes from out of Africa. Some Humans there are extremely old and of course there are mutations which occur as many times as out of Africa. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Scientists are free to study deeply, though. It is just that you cannot feed yourself studying science without being financed by the powerful (e.g. politicians) and the wealthy (e.g. mega-corporations).
The wealthy tend to avoid funding research when it could cause to lose their money. And those who are willing to lose their money are funding it to advance their ideology. Politicians tend to use scientists for political and ideological gain. People like scientists, but the moment they are used as puppets of the powerful and the rich, they will feel that the real science is manipulated to suit the wants of the powerful and the rich instead of seeking the truth.
@@retrictumrectus1010 The Genealogists, whose studies I read quite A LONG TIME AGO NOW, are: "DEEP ANCESTRY The Genographic Project" which took a long time to complete all over the world, by taking actual genetic samples from people all over the world, was written by Spencer Wells; and "Out of Eden" -the peopling of the world; and also, "EDEN IN THE EAST" by Stephen Oppenheimer, were just two books revealing the long collecting of genes, from all over the world called the Genome Project. It was conducted by scientists who even went as far as the Pacific Ocean, to the far flung Pacific islands, and found out connections about cultures which had connections with the great floods mentioned in the Bible and the original stories about two brothers which affected the religions of the Levant and also the Sumerians, before they came from a place we are not sure of yet, driven there because of a flood! We know now that these floods happened all over the world, and was caused by a warm period which melted the ice and actually caused floods all over the world. America was affected badly and the evidence of immense flooding in the landscape of the Americas is also factual. Ice in the polar regions have regularly burgeoned and melted over many millennia, and all the regions of the world with human have recorded these in many places. The GENOME PROJECT had to be financed, but not by prejudiced people. Scientists went out to find the facts, which are that humans were born in Africa, and then went out of Africa, approximately 75,000 years ago when the world's polar regions had sucked up much of the ocean; which meant there was a lot more land visible to walk upon, and less ocean; and as the first colonists, these Africans' bodies and skin, adapted to a range of different climates, as they slowly explored the planet and went to the whole of the rest of the world. It is a marvellous exploration and very exciting and marvellous, and it is part of Human Ancient History. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Religion has contributed a great deal to the dumbing down of human reasoning ability and capacity.
Thank you! I am part Chibcha Native. I’ve always said my people took “the longest walk.” Take care my fellow humans.
Your ancestor just loves adventuring and declining an invitation to settle down from other types
That’s not a dna. You can tell when folks claim things. It’s a tribe. You can’t be mixed with it.
And your main part took the "longest sailing" 😅
@@Teddy_Grahammost of the "tribes" doesnt exist anymore and are diluded in european dna
Science give you reality, religions give you make
believe and confusion and racism and bullshit
I took a 23&me test, which opened my mind to this studies. I am from Puerto Rico, and I’m adopted. No clue about biological parents. Despite I may look European, I was certain that I must had three different races in me, European, African and Native American. But I was not so sure about the Taino heritage (Native American from the Caribbean), since I was told that the Europeans exterminated them, and just a few puertorricans may still have some DNA traces. I took the 23&me test and guess what, I not only have all three races on me, of course European dominates, that’s why I look white from the Mediterranean, but I was so happy to find my haplo group is A2 which is a variant from A. Also understanding how all humans (homophobia sapiens sapiens) come from the same woman from Eastern Africa. She is the real Eve, and that makes us all brothers and sisters.
Hey dude, I ain't your Bro!
European, African and Native American = natives are all BLACK
who deleted my answers = when this is clearly facts. YOU HAVE 3 LOCATION IN YOU not 3 races.
"white from the Mediterranean" is not a thing = Ask any the Romans. or ask America why they are reluctant to add Spain + Italy to the "white people category"
YOU CANNOT USE HOLLYWOOD CASTING AS REAL HISTORY
👸🏾👑Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (Sophia Charlotte; 19 May 1744 - 17 November 1818) was Queen of Great Britain and of Ireland as the wife of King George III
BUT SHE was from a Germany Royal Family. Blacks were ruling Germany & UK in the same timeframe USA was being founded
so in 200 years they systematically white-washed Earth history. The notion that white is Europe is false. CaucASIAN
WHEN columbus landed in the Caribbean he said he met copperskin people. nothing about chinese looking bitches ( AmerIndians are not the natives.) Awaraks are black
if Mansa sail from Africa to the Americas to rule over a kingdoms ...what are the chances they are also blacks here
--- you cant be Spanish culture and African culture
Spain culture is Moorish culture + and Moors are from West Africa. = you dont have 2 races of culture you have 2 location of culture
Yawn!!!
Race doesn’t exist 😂. White man fooled you
@@fivestar000 its too LATE NOW for all of that. RACE will continue, even if we know better.
1492 is in reverse: and you cant "we human" now because power is about to switch back.
That was very interesting. I always love it when maps are included. Very helpful.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
the world map is wrong and fake in its locations, coordinates, sizes and distances.
I am a linguist and this matches perfectly what Chomsky says about the origin/evolution of language. I loved the video.
Where are their remains... ?
This mtDNA distribution map as well as every other such map ever made leaves one with the impression that there is more genetic diversity outside Africa than within Africa, which is actually opposite to reality. The one L branch all non-Africans descend from (L3) gets a detailed examination and an A to Z color-coded type classification which the other L branches that remained within Africa do not get (L0 to L6). In fact most of the L3 branch is in Africa, L3 has seven equidistant descendants: L3a, L3b'f, L3c'd, L3e'i'k'x, L3h, M, N. Five are African, while two are associated with non Africans. .So 6 out of 7 of the human mtDNA branches are completely ignored because it is within Africa and not deemed worthy of expansion and only a small fraction (two seventh, 2⁄7) of the 7th branch is represented. So we are actually looking at less than 4% of the human family tree.. There are more ethnic groups in Africa than the rest of the world combined. There are over 3,000 different ethnic groups speaking more than 2,100 different languages in Africa. And Africa will account for more than half of the world’s population growth by 2050. Nigeria alone is forecast to overtake China in total population size before the end of this century. So this is a population that should not be ignored.
poemusart.com/poemusart/en/index/EgyptsLamentpart1/index.php
That's a good point. It was not intentionally ignored. There is not enough information about the remaining genes in Africa, and it is not well-reported because it is under-studied. After studying a little more, I will try to make an episode about migration in Africa.
Lol 😂 ( BLM)
@@bettyschneider5268 Mocking Africans Betty Schneider? What did they do to you?
@@bettyschneider5268 karen
@@bettyschneider5268 What does this have to do with BLM
This topic should be included in schools
It's crazy that it isn't yet
IF it were true.
@DrCorvid you must have the answers then. 😂.
@@classicview all the truths fake news could think up...;)
The enormity of the study. Who do we thank for all this information. Certainly, all the biologists and scientists. But we are thankful for channels like yours, for simplifying it all. A big thank you sir
The ancient Hindu world view of Vasudeyva kuthumbakam (world is one family) takes on special meaning.
Spot on, Shashi
@@nikhilgoradia8949 the Quran says the same thing... Al-Baqarah 2:213
كَانَ النَّاسُ اُمَّةً وَّاحِدَةً ۟ فَبَعَثَ اللّٰهُ النَّبِيّٖنَ مُبَشِّرِيْنَ وَمُنْذِرِيْنَ ۪ وَاَنْزَلَ مَعَهُمُ الْكِتٰبَ بِالْحَقِّ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فِيْمَا اخْتَلَفُوْا فِيْهِ ؕ وَمَا اخْتَلَفَ فِيْهِ اِلَّا الَّذِيْنَ اُوْتُوْهُ مِنْۢ بَعْدِ مَا جَآءَتْهُمُ الْبَيِّنٰتُ بَغْيًۢا بَيْنَهُمْ ۚ فَهَدَي اللّٰهُ الَّذِيْنَ اٰمَنُوْا لِمَا اخْتَلَفُوْا فِيْهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ بِاِذْنِهٖ ؕ وَاللّٰهُ يَهْدِيْ مَنْ يَّشَآءُ اِلٰي صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيْمٍ
Mankind was [of] one religion [before their deviation]; then Allah sent the prophets as bringers of good tidings and warners and sent down with them the Scripture in truth to judge between the people concerning that in which they differed. And none differed over it [i.e., the Scripture] except those who were given it - after the clear proofs came to them - out of jealous animosity among themselves. And Allah guided those who believed to the truth concerning that over which they had differed, by His permission. And Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path.
and yes I remember vasudev kutumbukum when I read this verse.
Hinduism got millions of gods, which means world is not a single family.
@@KA-bw3wf Qur'an is copied from pre-islamic abrahamic books and local tribal faiths 😊 ,it's just 1500 years old.
To improve A.I. speech, take extra care with punctuation and spaces in the text that you supply. There were several parts that didn't work well.
At last! I've been looking for something like this for so long... Thank you Geo Nomad!
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
the world map is wrong and fake in its locations, coordinates, sizes and distances.
Its so weird how long the journey was to colonize madagascar. A native of the island is more closely related to an asian than a south or east african who live right off the coast that part blew my mind
Yes, they are from Indonesia and the Malay Peninsula rather than the African Mainland.
@@geonomad1 nor true. "Ricaut's group has shown that the Malagasy genetic diversity is 68 percent African and 32 percent Asian. Based on their evidence, the Banjar were the most probable Asian population that traveled to Madagascar. The genetic dating supports the hypothesis that this Austronesian migration occurred around 1,000 years ago, while the last significant Bantu migration to Madagascar began 300 years later, perhaps following climate change in Africa. " took it from a science paper
The people of Madagascar are mixed and certainly are closely related to other Africans as well as southwest Asians.
@@geonomad1 Actually Black Africans also settled in Madagascar resulting in the mixed modern population.
@@listenup2882 Everyone found Africans there already
I would love to see the Kurgan Hypothesis demonstrated this way. The spread and development of the Indo-European languages has always fascinated me.
Amazing our first Mother came from Africa 👍😃
They're still uncovering info on Proto Indo European languages. After several decades, the first of several of these languages has been deciphered, so, a little more info there. 🎉 I don't think it will be much longer before they have a more detailed map.
@@Jolene8 That is excellent news. I will stay tuned. Thanks.
If stuff like that would be taught in schools, there will be much less “racism”
Very nice thanks I've been waiting for info about Polynesian Origins like this for a long time. Very well done, and, to the point. Cheers 🌴🌎🌊🤙.
Thanks!!
Are you not Polynesian? Coz I am Maori and I've known my whole life that we all originated in Taiwan, our whole race has always known where we came from
@@sendit1924 Yes so am I. But I'm Samoan from the old triangle of Fiji, Tonga, and, Samoa. We weren't as isolated as the Maori were once they established the magnificent culture in Aotearoa.
Language wise you'll be able to follow migrations. We have Solomon Island, Vanuatu, and, Papua New Guinea in our roots. Follow the Lapita Pottery culture that ends on my Island. Down to my village, archeologists have discovered shards of pottery.
I think they got tired of pottery breaking, and, went with wooden bowls aka Tanoas.
It doesn't add up. Science can always be boiled down to simple logic, if the theory is true we should see generations getting lighter or darker from living in hot/cold climates. If the change is as dramatic as an African to an Englishman or Chinese person, we should be able to detect the slight changes even in far shorter amounts of time, same goes for facial and bone structure.
This is exactly the content I was looking for.
Thank you so much for making these videos.
I love it ;) (intp here)
Thank You
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
An important fact is that The polar regions at the time had sucked up masses of ocean, and the beach to the right or East of Yemen was a beach, because the ocean was a lot lower. This enabled humans to walk up the beach and also drink fresh water from streams that came out of the cliffs. When the humans reached what we call the Persian Gulf; then, it was a river not a sea, and there was a lot more land. Jeff Rose thinks that it might have been a paradise with other islands, and before it reached the Indian Ocean, fresh water and beautiful animals and palm trees laden with fruits were in this place. It might have been that place we now call Paradise, and we remembered this, and put it in our memory. The world was different all over, because of less Ocean and more land exposed by the Polar Ice. There was a lot more land exposed, that Humans could walk on, such as the top part of AUSTRALIA which came almost up to the top of Indonesia, and joined Papuan New Guinea. This helped humans to get to where they eventually went. We cannot imagine how and when Humans went unless we know what the state of the Oceans and Land was like at the time Humans came out of Africa., and we have worked out most of the states of the historical Polar regions, and when they burgeoned and when they melted. It makes a huge different to where and when Humans discovered different parts of the world. See the works of Jeffrey Rose.
Cynthia I cannot thank you enough for your comment,I have been fascinated with this topic for the past year now and was wondering where to begin with it all,I will check out the Work of the individual u mentioned, again, thanks for ur words!🙏
@@reggieknight5208 Also, "Deep Ancestry-inside the Genographic Project", by Spencer Wells; which took nine years to realise, looking at human beings' genes all over the world. It revealed that we are all human beings linked up genetically with each other. Male genes are separate from Female ones and therefore their journey is different from one another. This often reveals that men took their women to the parts of the world they wanted then to go. There are many other authors, such as Graham Hancock, of "Out of Eden", which goes into a lot of detail. I was fascinated. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 Thanks again ill be sure to check those books out🙏🏾
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 My favorite is Graham Hancok. His theory about the Great Pyramid alignment with the Stars of (Constellation) Orion is quite fascinating for me.
@@khalidmajeed298 Yes! I love his work as well! SNAP! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
One of the best explanations of evolution I have heard
I appreiciate of your comment
thats not evolution. its migration.
@@michaelmetzger749 migration> new environmental factors > adaptation > evolution
We came from monarchy not a damn monkey what is wrong with you people.
people can explain evolution?
evolution is a lie
Anyone who brings any acts of hate and racism should be struck down.!we all belong to one Mother.
Amen
Not only one mother, but also from one father, from Adam and Eve. Then from Noah's three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth.
What ar eyou talking about? Russian and Chinese geneticists have refuted the "out of Africa" hypothesis
so you're saying we're all related and racism is stupid?
Basically 😂
Yes endless unavoidable incest
Well dogs are also all related to each other and are clearly different from each other
Well.. there are alot of types
Racism can be about color of skins, hair or eyes. But there definite cultural differences as well that may have helped with rascist reactions. If Africans had developed similar clothing, big ships, schools, permanent large housing, gun like weapons, then it would be simply skin, hair and eyes. But the Europeans had no respect for nearly clothesless, nonreading, nonwriting, mud and wood villages and people using simple spears or bows. Too easy to make the people into "others" mentally. Others that can be used. I believe this is the start of racism. But in reality, the English fought the French, the Germans, Italians, Spanish, Russians, Danish, Norwegians, etc, and to me these all share the similar lighter skins and hair color ranges. We humans can define people as "others" and therefore a lesser group of people so easily. And others can become sacrifices to my own groups betterment. (Not "my group"...just an example of the speaking). Econmic or class issues reflect this same creation of "others". Humans are sickening in some ways.
Tanzania's Olduvai Gorge and Lake Victoria's Black Africans are the proud parents of humanity.
That's it---Thats's all!
👌👍👍👍👍👍👍
@@geonomad1 Hear Hear!! C McLaglen
Thank you man been looking for a vid just like this
the world map is wrong and fake in its locations, coordinates, sizes and distances.
This vid is so well done. I wish there was more content like this. I'm curious about all the extinct branches with no living decedents. Also, is it possible that the odd distribution of haplogroups represents different migration waves that may have followed similar routes but separated by hundreds of thousands of years?
hundred or thousands, you mean? do do you think human existence stretches back even further?
@@jonmurrs7068 well we found hominid fossils 1.8 million years old and called them homos. The oldest anatomically modern sapiens (includes cromagnion usually) weve found are around 200,000 years old so yeah i think its fair to say human evolution goes back way farther than our oldest buildings or written records.oldest buildings and written records are less than 10,000yrs old
What i was saying is that different groups can migrate along the same routes at different times, so the genes and cultures look totally different but they're from the same places.
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
There were Homo sapiens who tried to leave Africa before this group, but they didn’t survive. One was dated as old as 300k years ago that was found in Europe. They were most likely killed by Neanderthals in territory fights, like we would with an invader. The last group had more sophisticated “weapons” that were more advanced than what the Neanderthals had. That’s why they no longer exist. The Neanderthal DNA in our DNA most likely represents a few babies saved who were raised with the Homo sapiens than any peaceful co-mingling and co-marrying. We would see Homo sapien DNA in their DNA from the previous encounters if that was the case and we don’t.
The continents haven’t moved very much in the last 70k years... it takes millions of years to see a significant difference
Wow. You are the best. Keep doing what you are doing and you will get millions of subs for sure.
Your encouragement helps me a lot in making my videos hard. thank you. We will make sure to do so.
The super early migration of those early humans - over the fucking open ocean - to Australia is mind blowing. It's almost as if people came out from Africa and just headed for Bondi Beach. They lived there for over 60k years before Europeans came along and nearly wiped them out. And their culture stretches back to the earliest times - they can still read and interpret these days the rock art and paintings from way back then .
no, sea levels are low so they just walked, I call bs that they're the first sailors, that's a theory
Yeah, they spent 65000 years stuck in the Stone Age. How awesome.
@@Haunt888it’s complete nonsense, but they actively rewrite history every day. Even their “dot painting” art is a lie - it was invented by a Dutch anthropologist in the 1960s who was documenting Aboriginal culture. They had no art to speak of so he invented it. True story, look it up.
That's absolutely 'not' historical facts, your statement is "mind blowing"! It is not possible that they walked on water, they can only have crossed via the land bridge (under 50k years ago), they had no boats nor any skills at creating any practical transportation! The first boats (verified) they ever saw were brought by Zambians fishing around Australia, who traded a couple of them! 🧐
@@aldunlop4622😁
What would be cool is if the topology of the map shifted accurately over time in conjunction with the migration patterns…
Ender7j Yes they never mention that the world map was rather different as the Ice age has sucked up a lot of ocean and the Yemini coast was exposed and had fresh water gushing out of the cliffs, which would have helped the First explorers from Africa to not die of thirst, and also there were plenty of mussels to eat on their journey. Australia, had a lot more land exposed in the north so that there was only ten short miles to paddle to Australia from the Torres Straights in Indonesia. Cynthia McLaglen
Topography
@@tutonguni529 yes Topology was very different, and the sea was much lower all around the world. In the future, as it has done before, the sea will rise and much land will disappear. That is quite a difficult thought to deal with. Cynthia Allen McLAGLEN
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
YESSSSSSSSSSSS. THANK YOU. EAST AFRICAN OROMO MYTHOLOGY TOLD US THIS SINCE THE DAWN OF HISTORY
It's why everyone on Earth looks like a tone shade of Ethiopians.
Complexion phenotype.
Equatorial hot sun darker melanin, to away from Equator keratin, and lesser melanin.
This documentary is *THE* *BEST* .
It *truly* explains Humanity.
MtDNA goes from Mother to all her children, both boys and girls.
Yes, that is correct. However, male mtDNA is not passed on to offspring. Only the woman's mtDNA is passed on.
@@geonomad1 Yeah women get blame for everything! First the apple 🍎🍏 now this! Lol 😂🎆🎇
@@bettyschneider5268 A true modern American woman.Can find a reason to bi**h and whine about anything.
@@bettyschneider5268 All that mischief women have caused and men still keep them around?? IMO everyone better thank their lucky stars that men are too gullible, romantic and desperately horny to give up on women altogether yet and would rather tolerate or navigate some truly dumb behavior just to keep their lady friends around
@@commander57 Seriously, even here in the UK many American women just out themselves as being unnecessarily bitchy, everyone in the world is starting to take notice of this stereotype lol, I guess they call them Karens lmaoo
That explains, why we Indians have been so diverse throughout history, 3 strains of DNA can be found in the same country, isn't it?
@@ankurraj6560 it's literally Human paradise
India seems to have been a very important place for the migration of modern humans.
@@mebansharaisantasticokhong7312
I wouldn't call it that like africa it is hot on average and geography and climate makes it a perfect place for pathogens to spread not to mention carriers like mosquitos
This is one of the reasons despite it being cold more colder climate reigons are also found in some ways also more habitable for living since it is harder for pathogens to spread and thrive
@@geonomad1 not after british
@@raibhansjadhavrsj6352 very high popullation and class system was there even before british life in indias countries was not good compared to europe people just fool themselves to believing that british might made things worse in certain ways but in no ways was india a paradise before colonisation started
Guy, they stated they started from South Africa???
Yes, Africa has the most diverse genetic variation among all humans, including more genetic variation than the rest of the world combined. This variation is useful for understanding Africa's demographic history, including when populations increased in size, contracted, migrated, or admixed. A 2009 study that sampled the bloodlines of more than 100 distinct populations in remote valleys and mountaintops found that Africans are more genetically diverse than the rest of the world combined.
The study also suggests that the center of origin for modern humanity is the southwestern coast of Africa, around the border between Namibia and South Africa.
👍👍👍very comprehensive and easy to understand.
Thank you very much.
the world map is wrong and fake in its locations, coordinates, sizes and distances.
Excellent Video and information. Thumbs up !!
Thank you.
A gold of video, thanks!
Too bad we won't be here to see humans migrate out into space and into other solar systems. Thousands of years from now, there might be many different human species or humanoid species(like in Star Trek) that evolved from humans. We may never find other intelligent life out there, but maybe we will be the seed that creates all different types of aliens species.
🤣
We will keep undergoing until we return to angels and start the circle again
ON YOUR KNEES, THE ONLY ONE IN "SPACE".IS YOU, IGNORANCE IS BLISS.
I know this is old but as I watched this I thought how cool would it be if the geologic changes of time were also reflected at the same time as the migrations occurred. You’d be able to see when ocean drop affected migration, or the drying up of the Mediterranean Sea, or the greening of the Sahara or the ice bridge between Siberia and America. I actually think leaving that out is a disservice to the representation of the data.
Yeah this map totally needs that. The coastlines and even position of continents would have changed alot in that long time span
I totally agree with you by the way that this would be a revolutionary visualization if it were created. The size of such a project would be absolutely enormous. A geologist named Christopher Scotese out of U of Arizona (IIRC?) spent 30 years developing the research and investing the time to create detailed maps of the deep geologic history of the Earth with updates every 10 million years going back to the start of the Paleozoic (~500ish million years ago). It's absolutely brilliant work, but it is the result of a lifetime of research and dedication. I suspect we have the data to do the deep geologic history of the Holocene with more granularity, but again, the time to compile such things is enormous. It is painstaking work. And of course, there is a significant amount of uncertainty within all of these measurements. One of the errors we make in interpreting work like this is to fail to appreciate that it could be very wrong simply because of the physical limits of the measurements upon which all of this is ultimately based. However, I do think it would be enlightening for people to understand just how incredibly dynamic this planet is. We make the assumption that it is static and things don't change. They do, constantly, and often violently so, and as mere shades upon this planet, we humans simply adapt as best as we can.
Thank you for displaying Mongolian nomadic life in the beginning and in the end.
Africa 🌍 the land of all kind 💛💛
Maybe if you believe "out of Africa" is anything more than what it is.... a theory. Brown skinned people are indigenous to the planet. That's why we don't disintegrate in the sun. THE PLANET. Not Africa. All they have is theories. No truths.
Yte people weren't here.... how in tf would they know?? We already know that they cannot be trusted to tell the truth about ANYTHING. Why believe this bullshit.
not any more
@@derekhough-jm9gc Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂
You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! "
You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
This is good keep it up.
Thx !
The Sahara was green thick with forests and sea levels was lower then much much lower.
Hi Geo Nomad. What database do you use for maps? Congratulations for the videos, they're very cool!
the world map is wrong and fake in its locations, coordinates, sizes and distances.
Humans started the journey near the largest mountain and ended their journey on top the larger mountain in the world. Proud to be Hawaiian
You live in a beautiful place.
I AM PROUD THAT WE {BLACK PEOPLE} WERE ABLE TO PLACE YOU THERE, TRUMP THAT FACT!
@kororoSTART BEGGING FOR THIS MELANIN............YOU WILL NEED IT SOON.
I am so curious about the details of the migration. Did they move constantly at any point or was it mostly just a few miles per generation? Did any groups attempt long distance journeys in a single lifetime? What is the distance per year of ground covered, on average? I have so many questions!
many many generations over TENS of thousands of years (200,000 to 10,000 years). 10000 is when they learned how to farm..
Intriguing.....I guess they had Andrew's Bugatti.
Jared Diamond kind of goes over this in his book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel". Even if humans only migrate a few miles per year, we would cover continents within a thousand years. For example, from the US Canada border to the lowest point of South America is approximately 8,000 miles. If various human tribes only migrated 8 miles per year, it would only take them 1,000 years to reach the lowest point of South America. Given that hunter gatherer tribes move much more than 8 miles a year, this is trivial. Pre-agricultural tribes would have had to constantly be on the move, not only to hunt and forage, but to avoid other tribes' territory as well. I would assume some tribes moved hundreds of miles a year if necessary. Some tribes were likely based on terrain and would have moved around certain rivers, lakes, beaches, oceans, climates, forests, animals, agricultural sites etc. Whichever niche the tribes specialized in were how they migrated. Depending on the niche (such as agriculture or easy prey) they could become overcrowded which would lead to conflict, and would have to migrate further out.
People came out of India. They had originally come from Africa. No one knows how long this took, but people have to eat and create cover in order to live so they would have settled for a long time in the place they had found until some of them went to explore again. From India they went to the Indonesian Islands and ended up near the Torres Straits. At that time the sea was much lower and there was only about ten miles to a piece of land jutting north from Australia. The group split and one half went on to Thailand and all the lands further north, and the other half went to Australia. Maybe that is why some Amerindians find an Australian connection, actually from the ancient people from India. The ones that went north were there spreading around all the countries which of course did not exist then, as named countries. Then eventually some of the people decided to explore Beringia and ending up in a very cold America. They spread everywhere and also kept going south. Many would have been affected by the time when the ice melted, which created the most horrific floods and geologist say that these floods affect can still be seen geologically and would have killed many people and animals long ago when this happened. Eventually the land and its people and animals recovered, and lived in peace with their animals. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
My ancestors traveled very slow.Once arrived in Central Asia,it took them 50,000 years to rich Europe.I know this for sure because i participated in the Human Genome Project.
hello sir, can you make a similar video on patrilineal lineage. and what about R1N1 gene?
Thank you. I am preparing now. I plan to make it soon.
Very good timing and useful…my daughter just asked me today what the origin of Homo sapiens was and the distribution pattern.
Thank you
Lol
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history
Mr. Ashish Kulkarni, Ahmedabad, INDIA - has already done ADVANCED research in this topic 👍
My interest is mainly with Indigenous Australians. I have read that the habitation of Australia started as much as 60,000 years ago as dating of fossils has indicated. Your excellent video would say it was more like 50,000-45,000 years ago, is there some more specific info that can narrow down these dates? Also could there be Denisovan DNA in Australian Aboriginals?
Yes.. Especially the Tasmanian palawa
@@billypoppins9138 Thanks for the heads up on the Palawa people, doing some reading on their history right now.
I am related to the original African Manju (L3) AS ALL THE FEMALES OUT OF AFRICA ARE. Manju (L3) kept mutating as we all do from time to time, and after producing a few more Haplogroups in India her kind went to Indonesia and then at the Torres Straights two groups split up, Cain ( M130) went to the North towards Thailand and another Cain and Manju made a dug out canoe and went to Australia, as it was only 10 miles away at that time, due to an ice ages sucking up the sea and revealing more land at the north of Australia. So the lady that made me also made Australian ethnic ladies!! Cynthia McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 Thank you for your comment, I will reference these descriptions in my search for more knowledge.
L3 Manju came out of Africa to India. She is my ancestor, and she created many other Haplogroups within India. She, and I mean a lot of her in the form of human beings, moved to Indonesia and then to Australia with her companion Cain(L50) who is also in Australia, today. So she is my ancestor and the ancestor of Australian Native women and also women still found in India today! She is my African Hero! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
5:27 600,000, should be 60,000
"The M and N types which left India SIXTY thousand years ago"
Not "Six hundred thousand"
Its a great video, I'm only mentioning this for young students.
Ok! Thank you.
🤣
嗄嗄@@geonomad1😮😅😊😊
So why are all of the African groups just L. L1, L2, L3, etc. But all the other ones are unique letters?
That is a short time frame for a great deal of minor mutations to present such general differences. Wonder how slow or fast we are mutating, adapting, to the changes around us today.
A resilient and persistent species.
Well you are not the first to ask that question. There has been a study of Australian Aborigine's who's population got splintered about 3000 years ago. The genetic divergence has been surprisingly fast. Today the rate of mutation is far lower because there is a lot of mingling of genes. You really only get a lot of mutation when you have an isolated population
We can already see within a couple of generation the height of the average Japanese or Chinese has increased. That's only in the last 50 years. What affect all the chemicals that we ingest as a species will have on us in a 1000 years for example?!
I read somewhere that it takes 20 thousand years for a given black population to become white (or opposite), by living in cold climate, reproducing only among themselves, without mixing with others.
@@zazu9117 from the birth of Christianity to today only 2000 years. with the movement of population, changes in diet, environment...i am guessing that the evolution of the human species will be more rapid than ever. What used to take 20K years might take just 1000 years now.
The minor mutations are just that: minor mutations. White skin in Europeans comes from Middle-Eastern Neolithic farmers who essentially replaced the relatively dark-skinned (think Inuits) European hunter-gatherers and now about half of European ancestry is from them. Europeans today have little genetic ancestry from the hunter-gatherers who first lived there
Afrika the hpme for all humanity. Proud to be the original.
good!
Great work! Your video content helps us to understand the adventures of our ancestors. Greetings from Europe BE.
People with the oldest dna are the San communities of Southern Africa and the second oldest dna markers are the Aboriginal Australians, which means their ancestors are the first people to have move across the globe.
There are also theories that humans originated in several places at the same time.
@@geonomad1 that's cool, please post the links.
@@geonomad1 Worth giving the benefit of a doubt
@@siyabongasuprise8386 the San people and Khoi tribes were the first people in Africa
@@siyabongasuprise8386 the San people and Khoi are the oldest inhabitants of Southern Africa
0:16 They were not ESCAPING from Africa. They were SPREADING OUT from Africa.
Sorry. It is not right word.
lol
😂😂😂😂😂
LMAOOO I saw that too I was like DAMN WHAT HAPPENED
I’m TANZANIAN an I’m proud of this🥰🥰🥰 🇹🇿🇹🇿 🇹🇿 EastAfrica so I thought maybe Ethiopian they’re holly more than us 😩An now here we come 🇹🇿The first human being
you do know that population of tanzania was replaced from west africans not that long ago ?
Congratulations Tanzania , from Ethiopia , the new human origin 😊😊
We enjoyed this label for too long tho lol 😔 ,
I'm Tanzanian too . 🇹🇿
We have born in a Blessing Land .
Kenya!
From Uganda 🇺🇬 our region is the origins of humanity they say Ethiopia to confuse everybody but it’s us..
It would be interesting if you could put names to some of these migrations. You mentioned the Aborigines of Australia, they apparently mated with Denisovians in Asia. I saw a TH-cam video about people who were pushed out of America and lived in Tiera Del Fuego as a remnant population - they dressed just like Australian Aborigines and had similar shelters. Then there is the big migration of Indo Europeans from the Caspian Sea.
Yes, that's right. Aboriginal peoples of Australia seem almost certain to have crossed with Denisovans.
The people of Tiera Del Fuego did have Aboriginal Australian admixture. Unfortunately, Christian missionaries brought disease & death as usual wiped them out. The few remaining survivors who were children were raised in the missionary & no choice but to have mixed race children cause there isn’t anymore of their people left. The last 2 unmixed survivors have already passed away by now. Catholic Church is Satanic.
@@geonomad1 ,the aborigines of australia came with the first great migration out of africa,there were another two great migration waves.....So this first wave could have made it to the americas.....then mixed and got pushed out by new migration waves,abit like the neanderthal......
DNA histry no perlal earth condinental plate move histry so tamilnadu people first move other world place of chine link only one histry ok .... Wold theeif yutha government hindia awoid tamil tamil people histry so same awoid English history of tamil people history
The Native Australians could not have mated with Denisovans in Asia, because the route was from India to the Torres Strait! Have you ever met a Native Australian? When they saw European men coming out of the bush according to a working scientist in Australia, I knew, they said they stanck from their sweaty cloths that they had word for days, and the clothes, smelt like rotting flesh! That was the first impression that the Australian Aborigines had of white men! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Wonderful. Can you please trace the Jarawa tribe's journey - as they have no Neanderthal mtDNA...which their neighbors do have, along with most other humans.... Please trace the humans with the oldest mtDNA and probably culture as well...
It's shameful that this lake is still named Lake Victoria.
Why?
True . Let's start campaign to change the colonial name to indigenous NAME.
@@mickuljatheseagull Before the colonialist thieves got there the lake already had a name by the indigenous people who surround it.
@@Koloviv48i yes, for example lets change Palestine to Canaan.
You seem to have a good point. sorry. I did not know the name of the lake the natives call it.
Very nice explanation. Thank you.
Thank You.
A map drawn by Family Tree DNA shows a direct line from Africa to North America. It starts in Africa a C, splits with a line toward Australia, and ends in North America as C3. The line is yellow. Q is a different line drawn in brown. C3 did not extend to South America like Q. Not much connections between C3 and Q, but I am sure there were some. C traveled mostly by sea. Q traveled mostly by land. I wonder how different that was, as far as hunting goes. Q had to deal with a lot of predators. Sharks were the only predators endangering C. C had to deal with a lot of storms and wild seas.
The narrator made an error; he said: "The M and N types which left india 600 000 years ago..." should have been 60 000 years ago, as shown in the subtitles. It is understood that he meant to say that, since the progenitors of those early Indians left Africa about 200 000 years ago. However, Creationists will be quick to lash on to that statement in an effort to discredit science and evolution.
If I might make a negative observation, the 'chatty' style of the script ("Will you not follow along with me..?" "Thanks for watching for a long time", etc.) doesn't really come off when combined with the digitized narration. I can never understand why videos like this do not use a human - narrated soundtrack - a competent narrator could surely be found who would undertake the job without charging an exorbitant fee. I have rather come to suspect the fear is that the narrator's voice and accent, _wherever_ s/he were from, would get up somebody's nose, somewhere. The solution that would have been used in the past, to have the speaker use *'received pronunciation',* or the US equivalent, something like in those old War Office training films - "Having completed their run - in, the Bombardier opens the bomb - bay doors at aiming point 'baker' and calls 'Bombs Away' "... (Or the Civilian version thereof) wouldn't work today, the almost contrived 'anti - accent' being taken for an accent in its own right. And _most certainly_ have ethnic associations! ...Yes, I think I'm beginning to see the nature of the problem. I don't think there would be that much difficulty in the other direction, not nowadays. The days when BBC Home Counties (London Area) listeners rebelled at hearing a Scottish Accented presenter coming over the airwaves are _surely_ in the past. Are we not all grown - up enough to see no issue with a clearly enunciated speaker from _anywhere_ narrating or presenting a video? I suppose that would be naïve. A video about the war in Ukraine with *either* a Russian _or_ a Ukrainian presenter would obviously be bringing difficulties down on our heads! That much, I suppose, is understandable. Perhaps less seriously, would a video narrated in 'Ebonics' be acceptable? On a generalist channel? Perhaps we need _more_ videos narrated 'in' Ebonic?! I feel that the question today is almost the opposite, that producers worry about the issue of "Middle - Class White Man 'taint' "(all White men being, of course, Middle Class, by default!) when making decisions about narration; either in the sense of it being an _actual_ *thing,* - at all costs to be avoided in the interests of social justice... or an invented thing, to be avoided at all costs in the interests of keeping the hounds off one's back! I do see a case for it occasionally being a legitimate source for concern in a video about, say, (to use an obvious example) colonisation. But I have to admit to perceiving it as, essentially, a made~y up~py thing. But then, I _am_ White! At the end of the day though, I can't see why it's not possible to just reduce the problem to it's bare essentials. Do you have a decent voice? Can you read? Do you have a basic grasp of this subject?
"Hello, can someone phone James Earl Jones' agent? Is Roger Moore still working? The post - boy; *He* has a nice voice, doesn't he? What is so difficult about all this?!!"
Thanks for the sincere advice. As the channel grows a little more, I plan to ask a good narrator. Right now, we don't have enough budget to gather materials and produce for episode production. However, I will do my best to make a better video under the current conditions.
I like the robot voice.
@@geonomad1 Speaking generally, the videos are just fine, I didn't see anything to take issue with, other than 'The Voice' - which wasn't something I would have been "All up in a heap about", to be fair; though that said, it's obvious that I'm not the only person 'annoyed' by the digital narration, one viewer even making the point that they would prefer an actual human voice - *your* actual voice, however *'weird'!* than some text - to - speech gizmo! I do appreciate that it's difficult, more difficult than most people are aware, to speak at length without getting tongue - tied, having to clear one's throat, needing to take a sip of water, etc, etc. - but no - one expects these things to be done (in) "One take, from the top!" either. Even a (mild) speech impediment need not be an, _erm..._ *'impediment'* as long as the material is intelligible. Sadly it is true that there are a lot of 'jerks' out there on the net, but it seems as if, once it is _explained_ to viewers that what they are hearing is _not_ an affectation, or an 'accent', people seem to be fine about it! By way of example, there is a chap by the name of Isaac Arthur who has that "Awound the wugged wock, the wagged wascal wan" - thing going on with his speech, but it doesn't seem, in any way, to cause any problems with him having an extremely interesting - and popular - podcast ("Science and Futurism", a highly speculative, but always science grounded, series about subjects like Man's future amongst the Stars, The Existence or Non - Existence of Aliens, and so on.)
However, I didn't come back here to 'push' other people's channels, or to rehash arguments I already made in my previous comment. I really just wished to say that because what you put out on screen is very polished - *not* 'slick', by any means, but polished, I had rather assumed, therefore, that the channel had considerable resources at its disposal. I am guessing that really quite impressive results may be possible with the use of 'off - the - shelf' apps and tools, but with my untutored eye, I had believed, such were the production values, that your videos had been built, painstakingly (and expensively) 'from the ground up', as it were. If they were not, this does not take anything away from your videos, rather it is to your credit that they have an an overall air of professionalism in their production _anyway,_ achieved with the judicious use of the assets that you _do_ have to hand. I find this sort of material very interesting and as a secondary school (ie high school) graduate in my 50's, I tend to regard myself as 'smart', though to be sure, no 'brainbox' (and notwithstanding the fact that intelligence is a bit like driving ability or ability in bed; it's not too often one comes across someone who admits to having _less_ than average ability in that arena, a logical impossibility!)... as such, I appreciate material that is intellectually stimulating, but that doesn't assume too much and thereby leaving me floundering, although I admit to finding the minutiae of some of the haplogroup 'stuff' hard work. As such, though, I am very much 'in your hands' in a field which is assailed on all sides by political, idealogical and pseudoscientific interests. Indeed, in my original comment, I may well have come across as having an identitarian axe to grind... I hope not, but if so let me stress it was purely defensively motivated in an environment that is _poison_ with that kind of stuff. In as much as I _did_ have a 'bee in my bonnet', it was with regard to my quibbles about the lack of human narration, *and in no way* about the material itself! Having noted your response, I now believe that in that regard (ie, the narration), at least as it applied to _your_ video, I was being perhaps a little bit paranoid! As far as the subject goes though - the origins of man and his (or her!!) travels around the World... I trust you. I'm in your hands here, being forced to bow to your expertise. But without wishing to sound overly full of myself - to have ones trust nowadays in such contentious fields is no little thing, *nor* a thing to be taken lightly. As such, I have been pleased to subscribe and look forward to the continuing enlightenment and education I'm sure your channel will bring me.
MY SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR MEANDERING ON AT SUCH EXCESSIVE LENGTH. As much as I struggle to keep these things concise, I'm not there yet!
@@geonomad1 I agree with the last two comments, two of my fav youtubers have terrible voices, one is a sci fi channel and he has a major lisp and cant even pronounce 'earth' properly and the other is a volcanology channel has a nasily monotone voice, but they make the best videos have hundreds of thousands to millions of subscribers, because as with this video, its interesting and informative, will sub if you even try it yourself, but i personally absolutely hate the robot man voice.
Hello from L0 haplogroup in South African 🇿🇦 love this videos thanks 🙏
Interesting theory. Cromagnon doesn't seem to have originated in sub saharan Africa however. Strange that this is omitted. Also, the idea that no humanoids set foot in the Americas prior to 10k BC is very hard to believe
@Talking Parameters the notion does seem to fly in the face of what I was taught of the scientific method. I suspect there are political forces influencing this one but what an unfortunate situation that would be for everyone. Not the first time however. We are uncovering new hominids faster than we can develop theories. This one is interesting but I think very unlikely
@@RichardMiller-tq6ut true lots of hominids being discovered. But modern humans didn't evolve from, for example the 2 million year old hominid found in China. All modern humans came from out of Africa.
@@aufumy imagine making a statement of fact when you know for certain you don't have complete evidence. Hasn't actual science found a way of nipping this type of behavior in the bud?
@A Historical Lens Lucy is 3.2 Million years ago, so first proto-human species were not just one type but many types, dozens as a matter of fact...But I believe this analysis needs to start much, much earlier, then it will all make much better sense! Also where the original human species first evolved from was not out in the savanna of East Africa, but in the jungles of the deep Congo region and further West even into what is now Cameroon, Gabon and along the great Congo River. This is the deep history of human evolution that is oftentimes overlooked. As an anthropologist looking at our evolution, I start the timeline back 5 to 7 million years ago (that's my Eve, a Proto Eve, even older than Lucy), and that the migrations out of Africa began 2 to 3 million years ago in migratory waves that were based upon the migrations of the animals we followed in accordance to the receding glacial periods. Please consider a deep history of our Proto human roots. This is not adequate in my eyes, especially considering Neanderthals lived up until 6,000 years ago and are in varying degrees in our DNA today for a reason. Let's go deeper in this timeline to our deep evolution and migrations and the melding of all the diverse forms of our species over time that create the unique diversity of our species today.
@Chroniclesof_Alicha Balaam; VidsbyAB perhaps. I suspect there is a large chapter we have yet to uncover, however. If our collective ancestor did reside in these areas, what did the less adventurous ones that stayed behind breed with? There is a missing "link" if you will that is puzzling. What of the ghost gene?
Your timeline needs to be updated slightly traces of human occupation in Australia have been dated to 65000 BCE recently
I wrote that down because the period between 60,000 and 50,000 years is a general research result.
You are too dense to understand that these are tracing groups and not just individuals. Just because you find a trace of human activity does not mean that a group was there. Surely there were adventurous individuals just like today who had the balls to strike out on their own and return to tell the story. I dont understand why people have such a narrow view of how reality works.
Excellent information. I did not know they also migrated from Africa between Yemen and Africa not just through Sinai to Canaan. All due to glaciation.
Those Ancient Africans left us tools, fire, cooking, clothing, language, hunting, fishing, art and music...
You forgot type W. I saw it up there for a minute in the west Asia area of Israel but it didn’t show migration after that. I’m type W3a and my dna profile is primarily England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Switzerland and Iberian Peninsula.
sorry. It was not possible to display everything on the screen. That's a good point.
@@geonomad1 it was getting a bit crowded. Lol. I was just curious and kind of double checking 23&me as they describe my haplogroup as Corded Ware people from the Steppes while, for the time W was visible, your video showed it more in the Israel/Jordan area.
It's Palestine not Israel.
Caustic Chameleon It is not important that your genes are from a particular Country. H, for Helena, K for Katrin, T for Tara, U for Ursula (the oldest female gene in Europe), and V or Vera are the most common female genes in Europe. Wanda is found in large quantities the North of Europe, but is also found all over Europe. Just look up "W" OR WANDA AT THE GENE MAPS FOR HER. Yes she is all over Europe. Obviously a popular girl! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
@@cynthiamclaglen5687 Quite likely it is not important to you. It is quite important to me. WTF is with the girl name thing. Do you need a pneumonic to remember them? I made a statement to the content creator not you. Your input is unnecessary and unwanted.
This is only a small picture of what actually happened. We're missing so many pieces to this puzzle. Its amazing
This is fascinating. How did some cultures see that mdna was 100% the true determination of familial ancestry. That is amazing knowledge for supposedly backwards, uneducated people. Seems they knew more than we did
with the help of science, I'd imagine.
My MTDNA is M1a1 and my Y-dna is e-m78 V-32.I'm from northeastern Kenya
You are from the land of our ancestors!
You must go back to your Origin 👌
@@tokosekgothudi9084 what do you mean?
@@mikailm6934 I was trying to say, you know to realize were one's origin is,is like you can go back and live there
Some Egyptian mummies gave this mtdna
It's now accepted that aboriginal Australian's first arrived on the mainland 65,000 years ago. A bit earlier than this timeline would suggest - but very close. Insane when you think about continuity of occupation and culture.
You mean they’ve basically done nothing for the past 65000 years? Still basically Stone Age people, despite no natural predators. How awesome. If Europeans didn’t come they’d still be primitive Stone Age people. What a waste of human intellect.
Aboriginal people are known to have occupied mainland Australia for at least 65,000 years. It is widely accepted that this predates the modern human settlement of Europe and the Americas. Extract form National Museum Australia.
So?
200,000 years is greater than 65,000.
Also we all go back to Lucy .....est 4 million years. So the Australian Black people didn't spring up there ..their ancestors came from Africa it's a slam dunk.
Hominids have 7.6 million year old fossil in africa
Who knows that, who are you quoting? That statement is utterly ridiculous! It is known, by qualified scientific research that a form of humans were present in Australia 40,000 years ago, it is also well known that they had wandered there from India via Indonesia and New Guinea to graze the land! Do not believe what the paid 'dreamers' tell you, actual proof suggests otherwise! 😏
References to Australian Aboriginals say they arrived in Australia no sooner than 50,000 years ago.
This video shows who discovered the Americas. It's not Columbus or the Vikings.
Most scientists agree with these findings:
*_1_* Humans originated in Africa.
*_2_* There were between 15 to 20 species of early humans.
*_3_* Ardi, _Ardipithecus ramidus,_ a female fossil excavated in 1994-97, has been isotopically dated at *_4.4 million_* years old. Move over, Lucy! (Lucy, _Australopithecus afarensis,_ a 3.2 million-year-old female fossil, was discovered in 1974 in Hadar, Ethiopia.)
*_4_* The Neanderthal genome sequence published in 2010 showed interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans.
*_5_* Current human beings are a subspecies: *_Homo sapiens sapiens._* 💕☮🌎🌌
We are Global African Indigenous people!! Love and Unity is the best key for us all together!!💯Also Giving thanks to the Great Mother's/Goddesses and Great Father's/Gods and the Ancestors and Guardians!! Saying from Snefer aka Bashiyr!!👸🏿🤴🏿
Thank you.
@Geo Nomad You're welcome it's my pleasure. Thank y'all!!
@Joyce Williams those are called visitors just like South African whites. This is not their land
its a lie
we all came from middle east
@@benedibrava LoL 😂 pick up a science book not a mythological story books
I am haplogroup K1a - not mentioned at all in this map;.what is their migrational path?
I am know preparing. You will see soon.
@@geonomad1 Fingers crossed......
Sorry - I failed to mention that this is my mitochondrial haplogroup actually K1a 11b.
Me too 🙂 It’s possible that they included it in U. I asked, but there hasn’t been enough time for a response. K1a4d 🤗
Me too Margaret, I don’t remember much except we’re related to Otzi the iceman in the Austrian/Italian alps. I’d like to learn the path before that too 😉
Thanks for sharing this well grounded information
Why do they show Africa as a small continent when it is the largest?
because it isn't
It is not the largest, and also the reason it looks smaller than usual is because they are using the mercator projection which makes everything away from the equator larger so it fits on a rectangular map better.
The Garden of Eden is said to have been in Africa. Also where we all descended from, so science and religion can agree!
No such thing. The Bible is a myth
Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂
You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! "
You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
World is one. The concept of religions, nations, and races came in recent times in human history.
Hate to break it to you, but there are dozens of confirmed radio carbon dates before 12 KYA al over North and South America, and up to 26 KYA. Your map is at least 7-10 thousand years off in the Americas, across the board.
Wheres the evidence wheres the proof? i always see people saying this but non of you give the evidence or source.
Just qurious. Oldest that can be sure 100% is 14 500 years ago. Most of those older have been depunked or were controversial to begin with
@viso93x unfortunately youtube isn't a good place for these debates because youtube doesn't allow links to be posted
You show New Zealand (Aotearoa) Maori and Hawaiian coming from Western Polynesia but they are Eastern Polynesians from The Cook Islands, Marquesas and Tahiti where the Easter Islanders also came from. Maori, Hawaiians, Easter Islanders (Rapanui) and those in Central East Polynesia share very similar languages and distinct from Western Polynesian languages (Tonga, Samoa etc) All Maori mythology also points to Eastern Polynesia as does the DNA evidence now. Rarotongans (Cook Islands) also have mythology about ancestors sailing to New Zealand and who also call themselves Maori
Thank you so much for the good information. I don't have much knowledge about that.
@@geonomad1 You're very welcome. The whole story of human migration is fascinating. I'm a New Zealander with a little Maori ancestry and taught NZ History. Polynesian navigation and migration is a story of highly advanced sailing techniques resulting in finding the last habitable lands on Earth. New Zealand (Aotearoa) is the very last except the Chatham Islands (Rekohu) settled first just 500 years ago from New Zealand, whose people became the Moriori and who were almost wiped out by Maori who arrived there in the 19th Century on English ships. The Moriori had a strong pacifist culture and couldn't bring themselves to even try to fight back such was the power of their belief.
All us Polynesians orginate from Taiwan.
@@sendit1924 As do the Melanesians and Micronesians. And all of us humans first originate from Africa.
@@keithtonkin6959 you're a white man with a smattering of indigenous blood lol
Good. Source truth. G'day Australia from Australia 🇦🇺.
Thank You. 👍👍👍👍
so Europeans, Middle-Easterners, and people from the American continents are the newest genetic variations. hehe
you are right. LOL
Babies
@@geonomad1 Not really. Modern day "Africans" like the rest of humanity also descend from a population that is ancestral to all humans.
“None of the principal African lineages are found in the Americas or in Australia. The vast majority of African nuclear and mitochondrial haplotypes is not present outside of Africa, which contradicts the definition of a founding haplotype.” - (University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology; 1998)
In fact sub saharan Africans are part of the newest genetic variations and genetically much younger than "Eurasians" Haplogroup E, the dominant Y haplogroup in sub saharan Africa is Eurasian in origin while "African" A nor B haplogroups today are known to share CT alleles in CT defining sites, while mtdna L3 is more related to Eurasian haplogroups than to the most divergent African clusters L1 and L2. See Vicente M Cabrera et al "Carriers of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup L3 basal lineages migrated back to Africa from Asia around 70,000 years ago"
@@geonomad1 So he is not right. Lol
No every haplogroup has evolved
The AI generated voice, with its mispronunciations and odd rhythm, is annoying and distracting,
I found it calming
Thank you for Telling true history honest history. They will not teach this in schools because of the truth.
Bullshit. They don’t teach it in school because it’s an advanced subject. Children have more important things to learn. You can learn this in any university in the world, it’s not a secret.
0:17 "escape"? moving is very different from "escaping". Human moved out from Africa wave by wave, it's not escaped . People did not even know they were leaving "Africa".
ecape is a misused language. Out of Africa seems to be a more accurate expression. sorry.
I'm European, so, as the female Doctor Who said "I'm the upgrade."
I am also upraded. lol
Thanks for the video!
So we all came from Africa, does that mean everyone has the N word pass?
Why do some people do not want to have come from Africa ? 😅😂
You are not being told: "Relocate now to Africa and live there! "
You are just being told: "You come originally from Africa and accept this fact. " 😜
Y DNA A00 is from Cameroon according to scientists and is Older than L0. So the question is have they found the oldest Mitochondria DNA??? Is their an L00 out there?
That’s fascinating! Would love to know more about Neanderthal
thank you amazing video. I Perosnally think mtDNA A % B came into Americas form S.E. Asia/E Asia, becauase they are associated with dark skinned tropical populations in Asia and found mor ein Tropical Native Americans. While MtDNA C and D took not ice free route(recent modern reasarch discourages), Costal route boating through the rainfoest-raintundra was the only option...
The Sahara was a wetland? Add the climate into would be interesting