Q-Value | KE of Alpha Decay (Kinematics)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 96

  • @FortheLoveofPhysics
    @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Gamow's Theory of Alpha Decay & Geiger-Nuttal Law:
    th-cam.com/video/suj5MTLGAUU/w-d-xo.html

  • @navinsawesomeanddivineacco4221
    @navinsawesomeanddivineacco4221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This is awesome. Content is epic, The english is fabulous and the explanation is lucid and clear...wow.
    Ps - Those nuclei drawings look beautiful.

  • @luniacllama8373
    @luniacllama8373 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Finally i found what i wanted! The only perfect explanation video on youtube for this concept!
    Plz keep making more videos!

    • @0xh4ns
      @0xh4ns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like your silicon valley DP

  • @Manjay420
    @Manjay420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The finest and the easiest way to learn 👌👌👌 the concept of physics ❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @gayathri7788
    @gayathri7788 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No words in dictionary can describe how beautifully u do the lecture sir... I love physics becaz of you.. Thank u sir..😍😍😍hope to see many videos ....

  • @Krishna_mine
    @Krishna_mine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir i just love your video .. i am in grade 10 and I just love the way you teach...
    sir, keep making this amazing video , we all 36.1k + followers are with you, and will definitely support you....

  • @kietduong4630
    @kietduong4630 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much! just cleared all my confusions

  • @ihabmohammed9361
    @ihabmohammed9361 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can't thank you enough! That was a great effort, Sir

  • @VishalMaharathy
    @VishalMaharathy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Till now i’ve been confusing binding energy with q value. Never taught about the kinetic energy part. thanks a lot sir.😌

  • @adityasingh1423
    @adityasingh1423 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely explained with beautiful clarity. Lucid English. Lovely Atoms

  • @niceonee2285
    @niceonee2285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️
    Now I understood this finally
    Thanks a lot
    I got stuck in this topic since 2 hours 😂

  • @rachelrace3024
    @rachelrace3024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explained very well. Thank you Sir.

  • @satyam7103
    @satyam7103 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really helpful I am lucky I found this video

  • @adarshrai4354
    @adarshrai4354 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Writting gajab hai aapki sir all doubts are cleared thank you😁

  • @anwyeshabhattacharya432
    @anwyeshabhattacharya432 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So detailed and clear description ... now I'm able to solve a certain kind of question..

  • @muhammedmuhsina.3010
    @muhammedmuhsina.3010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks. Interesting and simple presentation.

  • @rachnasinghkgmu4215
    @rachnasinghkgmu4215 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Sir u really cleared my all doubts

  • @muhammadsajid7662
    @muhammadsajid7662 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much sir,
    Very simple and conceptual approach.

  • @AvinashKumar-jj2vi
    @AvinashKumar-jj2vi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lot of best wishes from another walter lewin fan here...crisp content

  • @alessandroramosjunior525
    @alessandroramosjunior525 ปีที่แล้ว

    As always, thank you sir

  • @CEOOFGOOGLE.
    @CEOOFGOOGLE. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation is like oh my God😙

  • @abhisheka8118
    @abhisheka8118 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    loads of love. THANK YOU for your fabulous lectures

  • @markfar4837
    @markfar4837 ปีที่แล้ว

    brilliant explanation sir.

  • @numbercruncher8744
    @numbercruncher8744 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    crystal clear explanation

  • @jatinsahu5257
    @jatinsahu5257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Epic explained

  • @sksharma3156
    @sksharma3156 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ur explanatory power is gajab

  • @musarratmajid8372
    @musarratmajid8372 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome Sir

  • @niseshgurung3447
    @niseshgurung3447 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally I understood it.
    Thank you sir❤

  • @vedtiwari1511
    @vedtiwari1511 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice voice sir and best explanation

  • @xobert2466
    @xobert2466 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explaination

  • @rahul2k208
    @rahul2k208 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome sir.. And thanks for your service

  • @sanampreetsingh2563
    @sanampreetsingh2563 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much sir. Your explanation was smooth

  • @dooooo7188
    @dooooo7188 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @Abdullah-if6mu
    @Abdullah-if6mu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much.

  • @sofia-nf5ll
    @sofia-nf5ll 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    consider single interaction of alpha particle with an electron before interaction the alpha particle has kinetic energy t and electron is at rest after interaction alpha particle loss kinetic energy ∆T relation between t and ∆T

  • @ananyaprakash4262
    @ananyaprakash4262 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great quality videos as always

  • @sejalsakshi2953
    @sejalsakshi2953 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir ❤️

  • @ShubhamKejriwal
    @ShubhamKejriwal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much! You earned a subscriber!

  • @AbhisekMishra
    @AbhisekMishra 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot Sir 🙏 🙏 awesome explaination 👍

  • @cebolenkosinxumalo1354
    @cebolenkosinxumalo1354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great explaination. thanks, #FortheLoveOfPhysics

  • @vanshita2477
    @vanshita2477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely explained 👍

  • @muhammadalialamialami7036
    @muhammadalialamialami7036 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are just amazing sir but just kindly provide notes too about calculation and derivations

  • @vkvajpai6183
    @vkvajpai6183 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @nidhisharma3932
    @nidhisharma3932 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect

  • @sandeepdey176
    @sandeepdey176 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In alpha decay process an alpha particle which is a He nucleus with 2+ charge is emitted. I would like to know what happens to those 2 electrons (electrons are emitted in beta negative decay) which are lost in alpha decay. Ur lectures are very impressive n informative.

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi that's a very good question. Usually in nuclear experiment we are not concerned with the electrons orbitting the parent nuclei. But once parent nuclei emits and alpha particle (its atomic number decreases and it becomes a new element) it doesn't need those 2 electrons otherwise it woul become a negative ion. There is a possibility of the alpha particle to attract those 2 electrons and become neutral helium gas

    • @sandeepdey176
      @sandeepdey176 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the answer. I was wondering, will it be wrong to say in alpha decay both He(2+) and electrons are emitted and a new elemental isotope is formed. Relating to beta minus decay where a neutron is converted to a proton and an electron, an alpha decay actually gives electrons also. Books don't discuss all these in much detail.
      Well, is it because in alpha decay electrons are emitted from the orbitals and not from the nucleus unlike beta minus decay.

  • @Amityphysics
    @Amityphysics 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very very ... nice sir thank you , keep on.

  • @kalidasjayakumar9819
    @kalidasjayakumar9819 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing you earned a subscriber

  • @kewrie1630
    @kewrie1630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how is the momentum of daughter nuclei and alpha particles same? According to conservation of linear momentum law, the momentum of the system remains constant, it doesnt mean that the momentum of two different bodies in the system have to be equal????? pls explain sir!

    • @anhadrajkhowa5850
      @anhadrajkhowa5850 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi. To answer your question, in the start, the system is assumed to be at rest and hence the momentum of the system is zero. After the decay both of them attain some momentum however their resultant must still be zero considering the conservation of momentum. Since their velocities are in opposite directions and there are only 2 bodies in the system, their momentums can be equated. Hope that makes it clear!

  • @roonilwazlib8137
    @roonilwazlib8137 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good explanation!!

  • @shubhamkhandelwal6764
    @shubhamkhandelwal6764 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome lecture

  • @ushakrish4665
    @ushakrish4665 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir to remind me

  • @vismayananak632
    @vismayananak632 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir 🙏

  • @burgerking39
    @burgerking39 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing explain! thank you so much :)

  • @RawezhOAli
    @RawezhOAli 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much

  • @bedantaupadhyay672
    @bedantaupadhyay672 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @shubhamkhandelwal6764
    @shubhamkhandelwal6764 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir please make lecture series on elementary particles

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Coming soon. Once I am done with nuclear, i will prepare a few videos on particle physics :)

  • @abdurrafique8641
    @abdurrafique8641 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here we see Q value as kinetic energy but some amount of it(Q value) should be dissipated in form of heat. In calculathetion why we ignore it?

  • @mskkx
    @mskkx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 2:05 is it not wrong?
    The mass of both daughter nuclei will be greater than parent nuclei?
    Please clear my confusion!

  • @lefterispapalanis2989
    @lefterispapalanis2989 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great video sir. in what form is the rest(1,7%) of the energy expressed in?

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanq sir

  • @yosephyeneneh5579
    @yosephyeneneh5579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its very nice

  • @premlairenjam7419
    @premlairenjam7419 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much Sir

  • @vasavigarlapati1404
    @vasavigarlapati1404 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn’t uranium stable?

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh thanks

  • @mariamchamaari5790
    @mariamchamaari5790 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Help me alot

  • @razinmuzamil142
    @razinmuzamil142 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plzz explain How you write eqn 1
    Momentum of parent nuclei should be equal to the sum of momenta of two daughter nucleii
    Plzz sir I get confused plz explain the eqn 1 you written

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      During alpha particle emission, usually the material is at rest, that means momenta of parent nuclei is zero

  • @materialengineer6441
    @materialengineer6441 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir kindly solv the problms related to this topic

  • @Physics_
    @Physics_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In some books and problems while calculating Q value , mass of electron is excluded from rest mass energy of the product and nuclei. So is it correct to say rest mass energy of nuclei rather than products/reactant? Kindly reply asap

  • @patrickmayhew3733
    @patrickmayhew3733 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How come you can cancel out va^2 in the 4th line of equation 2?

  • @thounaojamanilsinghluwang1464
    @thounaojamanilsinghluwang1464 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir how to show the nucleus is a quantum sysytem?

  • @NarendraKumar-zq9ig
    @NarendraKumar-zq9ig ปีที่แล้ว

    most of the disintegration energy appears as kinetic energy of alpha particle, why??

    • @SKbro2008
      @SKbro2008 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Kinetic energy of a particle depends on mass m and square of velocity there is misconception that more mass has more k.e but from conservation of linear momentum we get m v of alpha = m v of daughter nuclei
      Which shows that recoil velocity of daughter nuclei is less because it has more mass and velocity of alpha particle is more bcoz it has less mass so finally k.e is directly proportional to square of velocity and hence most of disintegration energy is for alpha particle

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plz tell me why conversion of proton into nutron is only possible in nuclus not in space or atmosphere

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because proton mass is less than that of neutron. Inside nucleus, this missing mass is compensated from the BE of nucleus. In empty space it's not possible

  • @nitishkaushik4299
    @nitishkaushik4299 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ♥️

  • @rindirputra619
    @rindirputra619 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is that mean when i get the Q-value is negative?

    • @rajatarora734
      @rajatarora734 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have to give energy
      i.e non spontaneous

  • @griffithfimeto3387
    @griffithfimeto3387 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is art not lecture not ant lecture

  • @amanisdreaming3914
    @amanisdreaming3914 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally! 😪

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok

  • @easyphysicsbyjmd
    @easyphysicsbyjmd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually I knew it but forget

  • @akbarakhtar4104
    @akbarakhtar4104 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    love from pakistan