All Fundamental Forces and Particles Explained Simply | Elementary particles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ต.ค. 2023
  • The standard model of particle physics (In this video I explained all the four fundamental forces and elementary particles)
    To support on patreon (video script with high-res art works) : / klonusk975
    Contact : Klonusk@gmail.com
    #standardmodel #force

ความคิดเห็น • 212

  • @kumarswamymc433
    @kumarswamymc433 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    I am a medical professional, I love physics, particularly quantum physics, for the past several years I am interested in Physics, I had seen lots of videos on particle physics,but your video is so, clear , simple and lucid , easy to understand, very informative thanks for the wonderful video 🙏🙏🙏👏👏👏

  • @CraigPendlebury
    @CraigPendlebury 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    The single best and most exhaustive video of this kind. I had so many "ah ha" moments watching this, THANK YOU

  • @michaelkirkpatrick494
    @michaelkirkpatrick494 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I have been studying and trying to understand as much as I can about quantum mechanics. This is by far the clearest, most comprehensive, and best explanation of fundamental particles that I have come across. You have earned my subscription. Cheers!

  • @k.dhinesh8938
    @k.dhinesh8938 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    15:18 in this point, a minor correction. Actually, in beta plus decay, proton decays into neutron, positron and a neutrino (not another neutron)

    • @everythingforyou8188
      @everythingforyou8188 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

    • @rivercox8172
      @rivercox8172 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Came to the comments to check this. I knew it was wrong, and i figured this was the answer, thanks for the confirmation!

  • @Joyly-the-Oliy-Doly
    @Joyly-the-Oliy-Doly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    this video has a very comprehensive description and contains a lot of facts! One of the best scientific videos I've seen!

  • @aungkyawkhant321
    @aungkyawkhant321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    At 15:16 the W+ boson actually decays into a positron and a "neutrino" I think there was a small error there, but all in all, great video!

    • @rulo9647
      @rulo9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Common W boson (im funny i swear)

    • @knowlegdeaccount
      @knowlegdeaccount 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      GOOD JOB BROOOOO

    • @abubakarawan1926
      @abubakarawan1926 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I m Physicist, actually to gain stability according to condition Proton Decays To Neutron with extraction of W+ boson and than Boson Decays As positron and Nutrino

  • @ellonganiza
    @ellonganiza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    This is so far the best explanation I´ve seen. Thank you!

  • @poppyseed7639
    @poppyseed7639 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thank you for this video. I’ve been all over the internet looking for a clear explanation, but it’s the only explanation that resonates with me so far

  • @MrOffTrail
    @MrOffTrail 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The Higgs boson was nicknamed the “God particle” as a bowdlerization. Originally, Leon Lederman had nicknamed it the “Goddamn particle” due to its elusiveness. It turned out to require a much more powerful particle accelerator to detect than was hoped, and wouldn’t be detected until the building of the LHC. Lederman wrote a book in 1993, intending it to be called “The Goddamn Particle”. It was a history of particle physics from ancient philosophers through to the then current search for the frustratingly elusive Higgs boson. However, as the book was intended for a popular audience, his publisher forced him to change the name to the less colorful “ The God Particle”. This introduced a connection to religion in many laypeople’s minds that still bothers physicists, or it inspires folk etymologies such as the video’s author has invented or taken from an incorrect source.

  • @douglaswatt1582
    @douglaswatt1582 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Not a bad introduction to levels of organization but it leaves out the really interesting story of emergent properties

    • @rivercox8172
      @rivercox8172 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Any recommendations as to where i can learn more about the emergent properties?

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My GOD--- Atoms and Sub-Atomic particles--- so much detailed sub-atomic world. Heck, mind-boggling.

  • @Sree4991
    @Sree4991 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is one of the best channel I have ever seen in TH-cam when it comes to the science. I have watched all of your videos. This channel deserves more subscribers. Thank you so much for your work, Keep it up.

  • @judelog1381
    @judelog1381 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I really enjoyed your video, I learned much more from this video than I did from my teacher in 2 months.
    Just one minor correction: @15:15 You say that a W+ boson decays into a positron and neutron, this is incorrect. A W+ boson decays into and positron and an electron neutrino.

    • @zane003
      @zane003 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks I was surprised and started taking notes thinking something interesting is about to come up.. need a correction to the video..

    • @zane003
      @zane003 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wikipedia says about W+ decay: "proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a neutrino"

  • @gowri1991
    @gowri1991 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Brilliantly elucidated video on a very complicated subject!! Keep up the good work. Looking forward to many more similar videos from you.

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yes this is very complex indeed. ---- and fascinating as well. How a human being has gotten capable of knowing so complex and profound biochemistory inside NATURE PARTICLES. Amazin and SUPERB.

    • @ThanQRadu
      @ThanQRadu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Helical Particle Waves maybe the answer :)

  • @mohammadkhadiv4921
    @mohammadkhadiv4921 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I love the way that you explain everythin step by step, it let me concentrate on subject and conclude.
    keep going I'm a fan of your works ✌✌✌✌

  • @FelixErn.
    @FelixErn. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really think that this channel is so underrated. Keep um the great work ❤

  • @asifiqbal8653
    @asifiqbal8653 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is by far the best illustration of standard model.. take a bow

  • @Ava-km7tl
    @Ava-km7tl 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What did I do to get lucky enough to learn about this stuff in my lifetime? Life is magical ❤

  • @meshkathossain7066
    @meshkathossain7066 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is not my field but the way you have explained it really makes me good sense. Thank you for this video.

  • @morpheus1988curitiba
    @morpheus1988curitiba 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    @ 15:18 I believe that here it’s a “Neutrino” and a positron instead of a “Neutron” and a positron as informed!

  • @flo.9908
    @flo.9908 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i know your views arent that much, but please never stop your videos are really really well made and so cool to watch

  • @alberteinstein6052
    @alberteinstein6052 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Loved the pictorial symbolism at 18:25 where the proposed graviton didn’t stick to the board of elementary particles and just falls down , probably due to gravity

  • @lokajay
    @lokajay 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You create awesome content bro and your explanation is so good !

  • @debilista
    @debilista 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    More than i learned in half a year at school, so much information that these specific pieces of knowledge fit each other giving a comparably full picture. I hated school for having to memorize particular pieces of knowledge without further explanation why is it so. Man, this video is santa arriving early.

  • @SHATOSHI123
    @SHATOSHI123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love this man, I wanted to know about them in easy way since I heard of them on my middle school. Thanks a bunch man❤️

  • @phanikumarnaidudevineni8224
    @phanikumarnaidudevineni8224 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful explanation.

  • @ziongeneration8145
    @ziongeneration8145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you this really helps

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MY GOD, SO amazing is all this.

  • @Leoo___
    @Leoo___ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video! But please maybe in a later video explain exactly how each of the particles spins work! There is a huge lack of content on the exact details of how particles “spin” and you could do very well out of it! Please make a video on “spin”👍

  • @DjimmyTrovy
    @DjimmyTrovy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a great video. Thank you.

  • @nursima5028
    @nursima5028 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very helpful!! thank you

  • @user-ep7wk3oz1i
    @user-ep7wk3oz1i หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir , You are really great.

  • @business_strategy1
    @business_strategy1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video, continue please

  • @Sparkl1ngM1lk
    @Sparkl1ngM1lk หลายเดือนก่อน

    when you explained how the quarks' charges equal to the charges of the protons and neutrons, I had such an "awe" moment that i audibly gasped.

  • @NeoHomoSapien
    @NeoHomoSapien 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best explanation 👏🏻👏🏻 thank you 🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @shubhammangalam8100
    @shubhammangalam8100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great videos , keep making such videos

  • @thoughty2fan278
    @thoughty2fan278 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New follower , excellent video

  • @M1zarr
    @M1zarr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!!! I love videos about physical quantum😍

  • @adriansiebenrock-xr4hf
    @adriansiebenrock-xr4hf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good video!!

  • @parodynx
    @parodynx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    before this video everything felt complicated. Thanks for simplifying it for me!

  • @jimx45
    @jimx45 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Still confusing and might have to watch more than once but this is good information.

  • @Dragon.gaming_
    @Dragon.gaming_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thankyou for explaining the standard model of universe and what those particles mean.

  • @Grandunifiedcelery
    @Grandunifiedcelery 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice Video‼

  • @felixkramer8946
    @felixkramer8946 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So good !

  • @2FDEditz
    @2FDEditz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This person is claims a nobel prize

  • @ShiyamalaMarimuthu
    @ShiyamalaMarimuthu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow amazing.. 🤩👏

  • @abi_952k
    @abi_952k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing 🤩

  • @MukhitAzimkhan
    @MukhitAzimkhan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    tank you this videos brilliantly tank you author

  • @ShadowPlasma832
    @ShadowPlasma832 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a printed version of a standard table of elementary particles but this is the best explanation. Sub to this channel.😊😊

  • @spironedits
    @spironedits หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make more videos! i began to like your videos very quickly
    I hope you make many brains braining 😂

  • @user-mu6ed4dx5f
    @user-mu6ed4dx5f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This channel is simply amazing and beautiful, just as its explanations. It deserves to have a larger public with such a good work being done in every video. Keep up with this pace and consistency, please. PD: could the next video be about quantum field theory?).

  • @Lokeshgowda2023
    @Lokeshgowda2023 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super Amezing 🎉🎉🎉

  • @studentamir4930
    @studentamir4930 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love it clear consise i won't fail

  • @Twofiddymill
    @Twofiddymill หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whenever I hear we know something, I always think’ that we know so far’

  • @shameem-gy1pm
    @shameem-gy1pm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New subscriber.

  • @sarala8044
    @sarala8044 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I got all my answers from this in vedio . 🎉

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So complex is all this.

    • @algirdasltu1389
      @algirdasltu1389 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well ofc this is one of the least researched fields and it happens on such small scales too

  • @john15399
    @john15399 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i finally understand E=mc^2

  • @ExtratoneJunky
    @ExtratoneJunky 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When it comes to these heavier quarks, the top quark actually does not last long enough in order to form particles with any other quark, making it the only quark that is isolated. Top quarks also have a mas of about 173000 MeV when the proton itself has a mass of 938 MeV. The bottom quark also lasts longer than the top quark and is not as massive and is able to form particles

  • @AtomicVerseOfficial
    @AtomicVerseOfficial 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Today, I was questioning how a neutron turns into a proton and releases an e- in the process, it seemed to me like an atom randomly disappearing (which is not possible btw). And also, I am 15 and still understood this very easily (probably wouldn't understand a word in a lecture on a black-/whiteboard). Anyway, great video, I hope one day I can make videos like these myself.

  • @ambinaGirly
    @ambinaGirly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderfully done very informative and helpful though one minor issue I noticed is when depicting the gluons they formed a triangle between the 3 quarks but much in reality we’ve discovered they actually form a Y shape but common mistake so is all good

  • @zarkforever5715
    @zarkforever5715 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    15:16 Was it supposed to be a nutrino instead of a neutron?...

  • @divaneeR
    @divaneeR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice clip ngl man

  • @davecullins1606
    @davecullins1606 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For once a physics video that doesn't confuse me!

  • @jacksonroy8720
    @jacksonroy8720 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:38 Actually, the strong nuclear force maintains the same magnitude on the quark as it gets pulled away. It doesn't get stronger like a spring or rubber band. Granted, it still takes a large amount of work to remove the quark fully from the structure, and for most people the difference in how the force is exerted between the two is inconsequential.

  • @ShadowPlasma832
    @ShadowPlasma832 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am actually a teen but have been interested in scientific stuff since my younger ages.

  • @esstown
    @esstown หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, at 15:14 there's a mistake in the diagram and the voice-over. You meant to say it decayed into a neutrino and a positron (not into a neutron and a positron).

  • @dahliabatache3861
    @dahliabatache3861 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    17:27 doesn’t the baryon made of the top top bottom quarks turn into a proton since it’s +2/3+2/3-1/3=+1?
    Also isn’t the electric field of an electron supposed to be centripetal like towards the center?

  • @algirdasltu1389
    @algirdasltu1389 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We started radiation, fission and fusion in hs and i always wondered how do you determine what type of beta decay happens to a specific atom.

  • @farzamimran3960
    @farzamimran3960 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    can u do a video on maxwells equations too?

    • @Klonusk
      @Klonusk  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍🤝

  • @PYRO_CREATIONS
    @PYRO_CREATIONS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a question.. is the mass of a quark 100% accurate??..
    2.4 MeV?
    Cuz I tried to convert it into Kg but I got a different answer compared to google..

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🌌 5:05

  • @anodominate
    @anodominate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    " We humans are the most intelligent creatures known to have ever appeared in this universe. " 0:00
    Quite a bold statment to assume or say.

    • @bbhrdzaz
      @bbhrdzaz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We humans are the most intelligent creatures that WE (humans) have observed to exist in this universe, until we observe differently

  • @kwccoin3115
    @kwccoin3115 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Muon is not just in accelerator. In fact used as a major example of special relativity in that context for time or space dilution or contraction.
    Higgs is only responsible for 1/10 or less mass. Majority is due to symmetry breakdown …

  • @kushagra1611
    @kushagra1611 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantum Mechanical theory pls❤

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just because life is a dream does not mean everything is going to be all roses

  • @svajojantiytgt4772
    @svajojantiytgt4772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's a really great video, huge thanks for it! But I don't understand one part. When you explain how neutron becomes a proton in order to be stable, you say that the down quark emits a W boson with a - 1 charge and then becomes an up quark, a quark that has the charge of +2/3. But how does -1 W boson change down quark's charge to 2/3 and not -4/3??

  • @erenkasimfirtina7870
    @erenkasimfirtina7870 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I couldn't this part of the video '' how does a proton get this extra mass from? and after explanation is saying that the energy between quarks converts into mass when we measure it. ??

  • @gosnooky
    @gosnooky 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The funny thing about AI speech generation is you know where the typos were in the copy. It said "noble prize" instead of "Nobel prize."

  • @ManyHeavens42
    @ManyHeavens42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    15:15 Im glad the Dumb particles
    Are separated By the 5 Level accions ,Otherwise We would be there Slaves,
    👈🐎👉🃏🧭♦️🕯️🌨️

  • @haipingcao2212_.
    @haipingcao2212_. หลายเดือนก่อน

    How many baryons can you make with _quarks_ ?

  • @Chrisbajs
    @Chrisbajs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:58 You forget to say "divided by C squared."

  • @khantxinpi5140
    @khantxinpi5140 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15:10 mass of up quark is 2.4MeV.mass of down quark is 4.7MeV.So,in nuclear fusion,where does mass(energy) to change up quark to down quark come from?

  • @RockerProf
    @RockerProf หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, except one comment. At 15:16, W+ bosons decay into a positron and a neutrino, not a neutron.

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤🎉😮 13:16

  • @gd44481
    @gd44481 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should be more popular

  • @EnnaRagashiyam
    @EnnaRagashiyam 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @AbulkalamAzad-qz1vv
    @AbulkalamAzad-qz1vv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @irithel-qy7db
    @irithel-qy7db 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While the neutron turns into a proton in the weak interaction, the negatively charged down quark inside the neutron emits its negative charge together with the w-boson, becomes positively charged in its internal structure and becomes an up quark, thus transforming into a neutron. turns into a proton. Is this true?

  • @KartikPatel-nt4ff
    @KartikPatel-nt4ff หลายเดือนก่อน

    😅😮😮😅😮😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅

  • @superearth5256
    @superearth5256 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please can you make video on heisenberg uncertainty principle

    • @Klonusk
      @Klonusk  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍🤝

    • @scottydu81
      @scottydu81 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not sure

  • @tenzinchogyel3264
    @tenzinchogyel3264 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    post moreeee

  • @eustab.anas-mann9510
    @eustab.anas-mann9510 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "We have never found an isolated quark."
    I'm pretty sure a Top quark always comes isolated.

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤🎉😮

  • @arunkumar_in_google
    @arunkumar_in_google 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think 4 quark particle found already

  • @chethanburre6016
    @chethanburre6016 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All Elementary Particles have Mass, Spin & Charge?
    But just a few seconds you said Gluons don't.
    I'm confused.

    • @judelog1381
      @judelog1381 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All Elementary Particles can be split into two sections, fermions (the matter particles that make up the universe), and the bosons (particles that act as force carriers).
      Both fermions and bosons have spin, and they both have charge (whether positive, negative, or neutral). All fermions have mass, but with bosons it is more complicated.
      According to general relativity the faster a particle moves the more energy it has, which causes the mass.
      When a particle is stationary, then it has a minimum mass, called the rest mass.
      All fermions have a non-zero rest mass, when stationary.
      But bosons will need a bit more explanation:
      Gluons have no mass when they are stationary (they have a rest mass of 0), but ,gluons can move, they are exchange between quarks, (which is what the strong force is) bind quarks together, allowing protons to form.
      Hence the reason why the mass of a proton (which is made up of 3 quarks), is less than the mass of 3 individual quarks, due to the movement of gluons.
      Photons have no mass, but unlike gluons, they don;t see an increase in mass due to movement.
      Therefore photons always have no mass and is the only particle in the model that doesn't have mass. However it does have a mass property (it can be quantified as 0).
      However photons have energy, if a photon has a lot of energy, it can become unstable and convert into a quark and anti quark pair (which both have mass).
      Z bosons, W bosons, and the higgs boson both have mass, no weird things happening there.
      Note, I am still learning quantum mechanics and I may have made some mistakes, but they are most likely minor. Particle Physics is the most complicated field in all of physics, wish you the best.

    • @mannetjie3704
      @mannetjie3704 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@judelog1381 layman here. i have a question. i have heard that any particle that travels at less than c has mass. is this true? if so, how can gluons be massless?

  • @ravisinghrathore6163
    @ravisinghrathore6163 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never had such a clarity🫡⚛️
    Thanks a lott✨

  • @Saifullah_4112
    @Saifullah_4112 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:37 Ah yes, The light here is made of light

  • @nword683
    @nword683 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do a video on 4th dimension?

    • @peebow1000
      @peebow1000 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, can you do a video in 4 dimensions? 🙄