All Fundamental Forces and Particles Explained Simply | Elementary particles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 365

  • @michaelkirkpatrick494
    @michaelkirkpatrick494 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    I have been studying and trying to understand as much as I can about quantum mechanics. This is by far the clearest, most comprehensive, and best explanation of fundamental particles that I have come across. You have earned my subscription. Cheers!

    • @NorthMavericks-ow7jk
      @NorthMavericks-ow7jk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is not quantum Mechanics. This is Particle Physics. It Kind of related but totally different field.

  • @k.dhinesh8938
    @k.dhinesh8938 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    15:18 in this point, a minor correction. Actually, in beta plus decay, proton decays into neutron, positron and a neutrino (not another neutron)

    • @everythingforyou8188
      @everythingforyou8188 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Exactly

    • @rivercox8172
      @rivercox8172 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Came to the comments to check this. I knew it was wrong, and i figured this was the answer, thanks for the confirmation!

    • @turbotreehouse9780
      @turbotreehouse9780 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks

  • @kumarswamymc433
    @kumarswamymc433 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    I am a medical professional, I love physics, particularly quantum physics, for the past several years I am interested in Physics, I had seen lots of videos on particle physics,but your video is so, clear , simple and lucid , easy to understand, very informative thanks for the wonderful video 🙏🙏🙏👏👏👏

    • @santoshd6613
      @santoshd6613 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me too!!!😊
      Do study Advaita Vedanta from a guru...
      U will love it...

  • @CraigPendlebury
    @CraigPendlebury ปีที่แล้ว +179

    The single best and most exhaustive video of this kind. I had so many "ah ha" moments watching this, THANK YOU

    • @johnalden948
      @johnalden948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I totally agree. I'm going to watch it through several more times to absorb all the ideas. Well worth the time!

  • @debilista
    @debilista 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    More than i learned in half a year at school, so much information that these specific pieces of knowledge fit each other giving a comparably full picture. I hated school for having to memorize particular pieces of knowledge without further explanation why is it so. Man, this video is santa arriving early.

  • @aungkyawkhant321
    @aungkyawkhant321 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    At 15:16 the W+ boson actually decays into a positron and a "neutrino" I think there was a small error there, but all in all, great video!

    • @rulo9647
      @rulo9647 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Common W boson (im funny i swear)

    • @knowlegdeaccount
      @knowlegdeaccount 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      GOOD JOB BROOOOO

    • @TalentMixture2024
      @TalentMixture2024 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I m Physicist, actually to gain stability according to condition Proton Decays To Neutron with extraction of W+ boson and than Boson Decays As positron and Nutrino

  • @Joy619-7
    @Joy619-7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    this video has a very comprehensive description and contains a lot of facts! One of the best scientific videos I've seen!

  • @MrOffTrail
    @MrOffTrail 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    The Higgs boson was nicknamed the “God particle” as a bowdlerization. Originally, Leon Lederman had nicknamed it the “Goddamn particle” due to its elusiveness. It turned out to require a much more powerful particle accelerator to detect than was hoped, and wouldn’t be detected until the building of the LHC. Lederman wrote a book in 1993, intending it to be called “The Goddamn Particle”. It was a history of particle physics from ancient philosophers through to the then current search for the frustratingly elusive Higgs boson. However, as the book was intended for a popular audience, his publisher forced him to change the name to the less colorful “ The God Particle”. This introduced a connection to religion in many laypeople’s minds that still bothers physicists, or it inspires folk etymologies such as the video’s author has invented or taken from an incorrect source.

  • @ellonganiza
    @ellonganiza ปีที่แล้ว +19

    This is so far the best explanation I´ve seen. Thank you!

  • @poppyseed7639
    @poppyseed7639 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Thank you for this video. I’ve been all over the internet looking for a clear explanation, but it’s the only explanation that resonates with me so far

  • @bawbak8800
    @bawbak8800 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I love how continuously and smoothly this video was going forward without feeling any gap or skipping in any part in the topic.
    Thank you sir

  • @worldofreviewodia5821
    @worldofreviewodia5821 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Its nice to see that people have gathered here and talk a lot about particle physics. ❤❤❤❤

  • @douglaswatt1582
    @douglaswatt1582 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Not a bad introduction to levels of organization but it leaves out the really interesting story of emergent properties

    • @rivercox8172
      @rivercox8172 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Any recommendations as to where i can learn more about the emergent properties?

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My GOD--- Atoms and Sub-Atomic particles--- so much detailed sub-atomic world. Heck, mind-boggling.

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yes this is very complex indeed. ---- and fascinating as well. How a human being has gotten capable of knowing so complex and profound biochemistory inside NATURE PARTICLES. Amazin and SUPERB.

    • @ThanQRadu
      @ThanQRadu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Helical Particle Waves maybe the answer :)

  • @munibanourin9389
    @munibanourin9389 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    best and most precise and complete Description I have seen so far, thank you so much

  • @judelog1381
    @judelog1381 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I really enjoyed your video, I learned much more from this video than I did from my teacher in 2 months.
    Just one minor correction: @15:15 You say that a W+ boson decays into a positron and neutron, this is incorrect. A W+ boson decays into and positron and an electron neutrino.

    • @zane003
      @zane003 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks I was surprised and started taking notes thinking something interesting is about to come up.. need a correction to the video..

    • @zane003
      @zane003 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wikipedia says about W+ decay: "proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a neutrino"

  • @Sree4991
    @Sree4991 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is one of the best channel I have ever seen in TH-cam when it comes to the science. I have watched all of your videos. This channel deserves more subscribers. Thank you so much for your work, Keep it up.

  • @gowri1991
    @gowri1991 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Brilliantly elucidated video on a very complicated subject!! Keep up the good work. Looking forward to many more similar videos from you.

  • @MegaTechno
    @MegaTechno หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am so happy I found this channel.

  • @ANSARKHAN-jk3eh
    @ANSARKHAN-jk3eh หลายเดือนก่อน

    love you , i have never seen simpler things and simple language that understood by every person of abroad.keep it up.

  • @meshkathossain7066
    @meshkathossain7066 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is not my field but the way you have explained it really makes me good sense. Thank you for this video.

  • @flo.9908
    @flo.9908 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i know your views arent that much, but please never stop your videos are really really well made and so cool to watch

  • @mohammadkhadiv4921
    @mohammadkhadiv4921 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love the way that you explain everythin step by step, it let me concentrate on subject and conclude.
    keep going I'm a fan of your works ✌✌✌✌

  • @SeauxNOLALady
    @SeauxNOLALady 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh how I wish TH-cam existed when I was in school… I learn more here in a twenty minute video than in years of school

  • @captainwheelbarrow649
    @captainwheelbarrow649 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was great. Just the right amount of detail and no waffling

  • @jacksonroy8720
    @jacksonroy8720 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7:38 Actually, the strong nuclear force maintains the same magnitude on the quark as it gets pulled away. It doesn't get stronger like a spring or rubber band. Granted, it still takes a large amount of work to remove the quark fully from the structure, and for most people the difference in how the force is exerted between the two is inconsequential.

  • @thelizardking3866
    @thelizardking3866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally, a nice video that is formatted very well that discusses exactly what I'm interested in

  • @asifiqbal8653
    @asifiqbal8653 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is by far the best illustration of standard model.. take a bow

  • @FelixErn.
    @FelixErn. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really think that this channel is so underrated. Keep um the great work ❤

  • @monishak3811
    @monishak3811 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow
    One of the best video I have ever seen

  • @Dragon.gaming_
    @Dragon.gaming_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thankyou for explaining the standard model of universe and what those particles mean.

  • @parodynx
    @parodynx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    before this video everything felt complicated. Thanks for simplifying it for me!

  • @alinaitwejulius5338
    @alinaitwejulius5338 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This site needs more subscribers

  • @cottonskaka-rb1kb
    @cottonskaka-rb1kb หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best explanation ever.

  • @morpheus1988curitiba
    @morpheus1988curitiba ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @ 15:18 I believe that here it’s a “Neutrino” and a positron instead of a “Neutron” and a positron as informed!

  • @donaldwhittaker7987
    @donaldwhittaker7987 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good stuff. Thanks. In school i studied history. I'm glad I've lived long enough to keep up with the sciences to however a small degree.

  • @Leoo___
    @Leoo___ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent video! But please maybe in a later video explain exactly how each of the particles spins work! There is a huge lack of content on the exact details of how particles “spin” and you could do very well out of it! Please make a video on “spin”👍

  • @vinod8june
    @vinod8june 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    after 2:50 ..it clearly shows that universe is making you sleepy ...so that u should not be able to understand the construction method of universe

  • @luzbuensuceso2916
    @luzbuensuceso2916 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love quantum physics and your video is such a joy to watch.

  • @sarkisianelin
    @sarkisianelin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a person who's obsessed with biology, physics was really hard for me to understand in high school, but I enjoyed watching this video so much!

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MY GOD, SO amazing is all this.

  • @MariaDor-i2w
    @MariaDor-i2w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for clear explanation of this difficult subject 🙏

  • @lokajay
    @lokajay 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You create awesome content bro and your explanation is so good !

  • @SHATOSHI123
    @SHATOSHI123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love this man, I wanted to know about them in easy way since I heard of them on my middle school. Thanks a bunch man❤️

  • @ziongeneration8145
    @ziongeneration8145 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you this really helps

  • @johnconner4695
    @johnconner4695 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing work in producing these videos.

  • @alberteinstein6052
    @alberteinstein6052 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved the pictorial symbolism at 18:25 where the proposed graviton didn’t stick to the board of elementary particles and just falls down , probably due to gravity

  • @keatomatic8535
    @keatomatic8535 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really amazing video thank you, super well put together and informative

  • @Ava-km7tl
    @Ava-km7tl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What did I do to get lucky enough to learn about this stuff in my lifetime? Life is magical ❤

  • @zacimusprime4865
    @zacimusprime4865 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done I really understood that

  • @nimaseyedmortazavi
    @nimaseyedmortazavi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing way to explain, thank you

  • @2FDEditz
    @2FDEditz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This person is claims a nobel prize

  • @nassirz237
    @nassirz237 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    At a certain point science isn’t more complicated, it’s just more detailed.

    • @nullexists
      @nullexists หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please help, I heard Quarks can't become smaller but somehow they can change! I saw an Up Quark become a Down Quark because it released a W- Boson! That doesn't make sense! HALP

  • @Sunshine-eo1ec
    @Sunshine-eo1ec 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lots of love to this video. It helped me sooooo much!! Thanks😀😀

  • @phanikumarnaidudevineni8224
    @phanikumarnaidudevineni8224 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful explanation.

  • @NeoHomoSapien
    @NeoHomoSapien 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best explanation 👏🏻👏🏻 thank you 🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @M1zarr
    @M1zarr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!!! I love videos about physical quantum😍

  • @jimx45
    @jimx45 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Still confusing and might have to watch more than once but this is good information.

  • @anodominate
    @anodominate 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    " We humans are the most intelligent creatures known to have ever appeared in this universe. " 0:00
    Quite a bold statment to assume or say.

    • @bbhrdzaz
      @bbhrdzaz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We humans are the most intelligent creatures that WE (humans) have observed to exist in this universe, until we observe differently

  • @shubhammangalam8100
    @shubhammangalam8100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great videos , keep making such videos

  • @akaza8615
    @akaza8615 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 10:42 the direction of electric feild lines for a -ve charge should be directed inwards

  • @MauricioAlférezHerrera
    @MauricioAlférezHerrera ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel is simply amazing and beautiful, just as its explanations. It deserves to have a larger public with such a good work being done in every video. Keep up with this pace and consistency, please. PD: could the next video be about quantum field theory?).

  • @TodsaranChinbat
    @TodsaranChinbat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you so much for making this video

  • @ONADITHMALLIKAARACHCHI-t1h
    @ONADITHMALLIKAARACHCHI-t1h 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank you very much

  • @Sparkl1ngM1lk
    @Sparkl1ngM1lk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when you explained how the quarks' charges equal to the charges of the protons and neutrons, I had such an "awe" moment that i audibly gasped.

  • @gatosaurioStopMotion
    @gatosaurioStopMotion หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a wonderfull video!!

  • @business_strategy1
    @business_strategy1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video, continue please

  • @ShadowPlasma832
    @ShadowPlasma832 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a printed version of a standard table of elementary particles but this is the best explanation. Sub to this channel.😊😊

  • @DjimmyTrovy
    @DjimmyTrovy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a great video. Thank you.

  • @RajatTulshiramKakade23BEE000
    @RajatTulshiramKakade23BEE000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir , You are really great.

  • @ExtratoneJunky
    @ExtratoneJunky 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When it comes to these heavier quarks, the top quark actually does not last long enough in order to form particles with any other quark, making it the only quark that is isolated. Top quarks also have a mas of about 173000 MeV when the proton itself has a mass of 938 MeV. The bottom quark also lasts longer than the top quark and is not as massive and is able to form particles

  • @narwhalocean791
    @narwhalocean791 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great revision for my test in 9 days

  • @ManyHeavens42
    @ManyHeavens42 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    15:15 Im glad the Dumb particles
    Are separated By the 5 Level accions ,Otherwise We would be there Slaves,
    👈🐎👉🃏🧭♦️🕯️🌨️

  • @zarkforever5715
    @zarkforever5715 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    15:16 Was it supposed to be a nutrino instead of a neutron?...

  • @dahliabatache3861
    @dahliabatache3861 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    17:27 doesn’t the baryon made of the top top bottom quarks turn into a proton since it’s +2/3+2/3-1/3=+1?
    Also isn’t the electric field of an electron supposed to be centripetal like towards the center?

  • @Grandunifiedcelery
    @Grandunifiedcelery ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice Video‼

  • @sumaiyaseif3500
    @sumaiyaseif3500 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is very helpful thank you

  • @cerealdude890
    @cerealdude890 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does 15:03 have the wrong symbol for the antistrange quark?

  • @ambinaGirly
    @ambinaGirly 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderfully done very informative and helpful though one minor issue I noticed is when depicting the gluons they formed a triangle between the 3 quarks but much in reality we’ve discovered they actually form a Y shape but common mistake so is all good

  • @adriansiebenrock-xr4hf
    @adriansiebenrock-xr4hf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good video!!

  • @ShadowPlasma832
    @ShadowPlasma832 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am actually a teen but have been interested in scientific stuff since my younger ages.

  • @mekdesdagne8636
    @mekdesdagne8636 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I will hepl you by any means keep up the good work mate

  • @Lokeshgowda2023
    @Lokeshgowda2023 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super Amezing 🎉🎉🎉

  • @VipinYadav-yp1oo
    @VipinYadav-yp1oo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice ...I have....no word.... ....

  • @thoughty2fan278
    @thoughty2fan278 ปีที่แล้ว

    New follower , excellent video

  • @khantxinpi5140
    @khantxinpi5140 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15:10 mass of up quark is 2.4MeV.mass of down quark is 4.7MeV.So,in nuclear fusion,where does mass(energy) to change up quark to down quark come from?

  • @spironedits
    @spironedits 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make more videos! i began to like your videos very quickly
    I hope you make many brains braining 😂

  • @TR33some
    @TR33some 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:44 only valence electrons can change energy. If core electrons could take a spot in the valence shell, the gap would be filled instantaneously.

  • @nursima5028
    @nursima5028 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very helpful!! thank you

  • @sarala8044
    @sarala8044 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I got all my answers from this in vedio . 🎉

  • @ShiyamalaMarimuthu
    @ShiyamalaMarimuthu ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow amazing.. 🤩👏

  • @esstown
    @esstown 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, at 15:14 there's a mistake in the diagram and the voice-over. You meant to say it decayed into a neutrino and a positron (not into a neutron and a positron).

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🌌 5:05

  • @joshygoldiem_j2799
    @joshygoldiem_j2799 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    18:12 is my only shortcoming here. Gravity is not a force, but rather the curvature of spacetime caused by mass. Relativity does a much better job at explaining it than quantum theory.

    • @nathanpfirman625
      @nathanpfirman625 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are multiple models of how gravity works. In this version it’s a force.

  • @felixkramer8946
    @felixkramer8946 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So good !

  • @RockerProf
    @RockerProf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, except one comment. At 15:16, W+ bosons decay into a positron and a neutrino, not a neutron.

  • @davecullins1606
    @davecullins1606 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For once a physics video that doesn't confuse me!

  • @muzzammilsajid
    @muzzammilsajid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:00 I think that calculation is wrong. I am getting 5.6×10^26 MeV/c².
    Since E = mc²
    Thus E = 10^-3(kg) × (299792458)²
    *E = 8.98755×10^13 J*
    Now convert this to MeV by dividing with 1.6×10^-19 and 10^6
    *E = 5.6×10^26 MeV*
    Since m = E/c²
    Thus, *m = 5.6×10^26 MeV/c²*

  • @Twofiddymill
    @Twofiddymill 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whenever I hear we know something, I always think’ that we know so far’