why do you think that the card before paid for would actually have its statement about during a players buying phase is in play, before you have actually played the first peddler bought and the action of the last lines are then in play, not in the place before it was first time purchased. after it is purchased the first time then the action on the card would then be able to apply its ability to play its action on other further along purchase of other peddlers cards. does that make sense. first not in action while that ability is not owned for you to apply its statement before you own the peddler card.
why do you think that the card before paid for would actually have its statement about during a players buying phase is in play, before you have actually played the first peddler bought and the action of the last lines are then in play, not in the place before it was first time purchased. after it is purchased the first time then the action on the card would then be able to apply its ability to play its action on other further along purchase of other peddlers cards. does that make sense. first not in action while that ability is not owned for you to apply its statement before you own the peddler card.