I know you guys hear this all the time, but the production quality of your videos is incredible and Spurg and Lemmy are excellent reviewers, keep up the excellent work!
Thanks for the kind words man. I am lucky in the fact that I get to spend all day working with one of my best friends. Even more so considering "motorcycles" are our "work"!!
No "sleeving" going on in modern aluminum engines. Aluminum alloy walls with high tech extremely hard and durable coatings. This 948cc lump has a custom head, cams, valves, pistons, lightened crank and flywheel. Same stroke as the 1043, smaller bores. The smaller bores means smaller valves. Usually a less over-square bore/stroke ratio means smaller valves and smaller throttle bodies for higher intake velocities (more grunt at lower RPM). Depending on intake and exhaust valve timing overlap, the engine can be very torque-biased. And it is. Per my own demo of the bike, it's EXTREMELY smooth, idle to redline. Very progressive power, a lot of torque right out of the hole, good low gearing to start, nice highway gearing for cruising. Chassis is very precise and provides great feedback to the rider (hands, butt, feet). Throttle feel is excellent without much of a lurch on/off throttle. No problem with throttle control. Steering/leaning is very neutral, no funky fall-in or readjusting lines mid-corner. Just rails and provides very good traction information to the rider. Transmission is super slick. No missed shifts or clunky action. Just precise refined function. It doesn't need traction control or power modes. Chassis doesn't feel like it's going to flex when things get quick and dicey. It's so good providing tire communication to the rider, one could easily learn the limits without overstepping them. I've owned a 2006 ZX-6R which vibrated badly at higher rpm. I've owned a 2007 Z1000 which had a 953cc engine based on the older ZX-9R block. It also vibrated a little here and there, and torque wasn't nearly as linear or responsive. It weighed just over 500 pounds and was down on power and torque in comparison. Also had a 190 rear tire and didn't steer neutrally at all. This Z900 is miles beyond those bikes in refinement (engine) and control (compared to Z1000). It's not bland or boring. It's seriously quick. Launch with a wheelie right out of the hole and fly. It's almost the power-to-weight ratio of the stock Z1000. It's quick. Compared to the 2016 FZ-09 I tested the other year, this chassis and suspension setup is FAR better stock. It's very solid feeling without being harsh. It's well balanced front to back. It's not see-sawing around under throttle, it just gets the job done. Pin it and fly. Wheelies would be easy, but it won't do them unless told to. It's much more confidence inspiring. From what I've read somewhere, the spring rates from factory are for a 170 pound person. I'm just above that and I felt fine. The engine has an advantage in power-to-weight from about 5,000 to redline. Below that it's a tiny bit less than the FZ, but it's still very strong and comes down to the weight of the rider honestly. Engine is smoother than the triple, noticeably. No buzz at ANY rpm. Tunes with full exhaust and filter show on Akrapovic's dyno to be 125 and 73 at the wheel. Weight loss brings it into the 440's pound range. Going to be a real challenge for the FZ. It's not a typical twist-and-wait 4-banger. No. It pulls out of the hole. Super engine they've made. There's already a Z-cup racing series for the 900 in Europe. Check it out on TH-cam. Bike is proving itself. Seat is garbage. What's new? Very few stock seats on any sporty bike these days are worth anything. I'd get it refoamed (thicker pad) and reupholstered for my liking. No biggee. Also a 3-liter larger fuel tank is a big deal for me, comparing to the FZ. I'm considering buying one.
i’ve been riding the z900 for about a year and man oh man! it’s a really great bike. i went from only riding dirtbikes, straight to the z900 and it’s a really powerful bike. you could be in 6th gear and that throttle will still have torque… i love the bike and i really recomend it for anyone looking to get a powerful naked bike. although it is important to not hop on it without experience. the bike is no joke
I have a z900 performance edition in green :) thanks for the video as there hasn't been much coverage on the z900 as of yet! .. I originally wanted the gsx s750 or 1000, however being 6'2 I felt I was sat over the tank .. I went for the z900 as it felt more natural to be sat in the tank .. :) rider modes don't bother me as the bike is smooth in every gear (smooth pull) so I'd never see the need to reduce the power, the only bad side is the...seat, I'm going to get my seat tailored (foam and soft material) as anything around an hour is uncomfy! Great video
Ethan W Hi I am planning to get a bike N I am confused btw z900 and Suzuki s1000 I heard s1000 have some throttle issues n z900 is quite smooth to ride Could u please recommend me which one to go for N I stay at a place where u can expect a lot of traffic Thank u
Great review, love the tall rider/weight comments! To all the young riders kawasaki was having an identity crisis, 800? 1000? If youre older you may want an inline 4, and a 900 is what kawasaki is known for. Some people want a "standard" standard bike, ironically rare as it is.
the whole middleweight naked market looks so good at the moment it all depends what you're after. if you're starting out go for good ergonomics and less power if you want best suspension and cornering i think the new triumph street triple takes that crown at least at the RS model. for torque its the MT09/FZ09 (MT=Master of Torque) remember that if you want more you have to pay more. the top of the line naked bikes like the aprilia tuono or the superduke 1290r or the mv agusta brutale range are the ones that tick all the boxes but come at a much higher price point. my advice would be to pick the bike that makes you smile EVERY time you throw your leg over it. if you do that you'll soon forget any flaws that every bike inevitably has. biking is about passion not statistics. for me anyway
What do you think about the tuono then...Its on top of my list but I'm concerned about its reliability. I don't want to put a large chunk of money on something that is prone to break down...should I or shouldn't I...?
stratshredder I’ve owned a 1050 Speed Triple , loved that bike, down economy forced sale. I replaced it this year with a used 2013 v4 Tuono and have put 5k on it with 0 troubles. Shit you not, best bike I’ve ever owned. On that list was a ninja 600, zx7, ZX10R, zx9, two zx11s, VMAX, Ducati 888 Ltd, Honda Magna, Vrod, gsxr 750, gsxr 1100...and more you get the drift. If you want a bike that you wanna ride all of the time and make any excuses to do so, buy a Tuono or Speed Triple
I'm 6'4" so this is interesting. I have the Z800 and the size is almost perfect. The FZ-09 felt like a toy bike when sitting on it. It was just too small.
TierIIIGamer I’m only 6’1” and I was worried about that as it seems kinda small. I’m probably testing an MT-09 when I get closer to adding another bike to my stable (probably later this year, I’m a year-round commuter). I’m between three JDM standards and the Triumph Speed Triple. I owned a Vulcan awhile back, but I keep forgetting Kawasaki when I go looking. X-/
The 2017 FZ-09 recieved a bunch of updates including some small visual improvements. For about the same price you get more with the FZ-09 in a lighter overall package. I'd pick the Yamaha over the Kawi.
Aesthetics? Meh. It's like asking a group of guys if a particular girl is pretty or not. This Z900 isn't a Honda NM4. I think they both look great. I prefer the motor on the Z much more. It's a ripper.
The Kawi has the better motor and chassis. The fit and finish is far superior. Suspension and brakes are also better and the throttle response is in a different league. The Kawi has masses of instant grunt everywhere [more than the FZ09] ,plus a wailing top end the Yam cannot match. I have ridden both and the Kawi is definitely the better bike.
I think Kawi went the correct route with this bike for the most part.. at 1K less than the Street Triple both with ABS its a serious competitor.. I'd wager that the FZ09 will give it a real run for its money with all of its electronics.. Having said that for me the Z900 takes a back seat to the Yammie and Triumph,
Electronics are fine, but they don't give any "running for money" as that's down to the actual mechanical experience of a given bike. Yamaha cost a little more. It's probably slightly better at the value proposition, but at around 9 grand, people aren't splitting up dollars.
MCN tested the new Z900 against the 2017 MT 09 [FZ 09] and the Kwacker out performed it and won the test. The MT just couldn't live with the Zed even though it is lighter and has electronic rider aids. The Zed has plusher better suspension which helped it through the turns while the Yam got flighty and difficult to control. The Zed had more grunt and a screaming top end which the Yam couldn't live with. They are testing the Zed against the new Triumph 765 Street Triple next so that should be really interesting to see who comes out on top.
Yes I've seen the magazine cover pics online and saw a short clip of Neevs saying the Z more or less trounced the MT. No videos online yet. Want to see this shootout.
This bike is targeted at someone like myself in their 30's to 40's that used to ride sport bikes back in the day and don't want all the fancy rider aids. I'm not trying to ride the longest wheelies or drag knee on the street these days. I just want a simple straight forward badass bike for a good price. Kawi hit the nail on the head for me. Time to go ride my spankin new Z900!
That's not a fair comparison. The FZ-10 is nearly $5,000 more with an additional 40 horsepower, electronic cruise control, four-stage traction control, better suspension, and better brakes. If money wasn't an object I would easily pick the FZ-10, but the Z900 packs a hell of a punch for those of us living in the real world where money is always an object.
Weird, my quote for this is only 600 full coverage for a year. For Mt07 is over 2000 and my 09 is over 3000. For sv650 and cb650f is 571 for Suzuki gsx s750 is over 1000. I don't get how this Kawasaki is cheaper than those and vice versa. But I am glad because I was about to pull the trigger in a couple days. Now I can get the z900 without regrets.
Its weird, I live in Tulare county central Cali, and never have been out to San Diego. This area looks identical to our foothills here. Especially in southern Tulare County down to Northern Kern and the area near Lake Isabelka.
Hey, I'm 17 and about to do my CBT. I live in the U.K. and don't know what to get for my first 125. If anyone could give me some advice it would be much appreciated
Hello ethan. Get a cheap supermoto LEXMOTO around £2000, get new tyres because the standard ones are dangerous but great bike. After you get the A2 license buy a nice middle weight naked bike like honda cb500F or z650. Ride safe
This is probably the fastest thing you can get for 8k. Short of a used liter bike. The power for the price seems unbeatable. Especially when you think that the MV 800 tcosts almost 20k out the door....
I see the FZ09 as the main competitor for this bike. The street triple has always been a step up from the Japanese bikes. If you are a rider looking at buying a new Street Triple then you are probably deciding between the base model Street Triple and the R model rather than deciding between Triumph and Kawasaki. My riding buddy and room mate has a 2017 fz 09. I've put in maybe 100 miles on his bike. It is a great great machine for the money. I have only sat on a z900. I think that ultimately it is going to come down to ergonomics and whether or not you need that triple engine. The triple in the FZ 09 is a great engine, I think it is going to sway a lot of people in Yamaha's direction. I find the z900's ergos to be more similar to my Honda CB919's ergonomics, and I personally like that. Regardless of which way you would choose to go, I think it is a great time to be interested in an almost liter sized naked.
Good to read that 919 reference in your comment. I missed out on two low priced, CB919's last year while shopping used bikes. Just cause I found a good deal and liked the ergos' of the VStrom for my re-riding purposes, I bought a nicely farkled up, '11 DL650. Getting my riding chops back after 15+ years off. Just maybe this Z900 might be the next, new bike I buy next year or so. Last two bikes I owned were '81 KZ550LTD and '01 KLR650. Guess I will just always bleed green, lol.
only thing mentioned about the handling is that it goes where you look easily? doesn't tell me much at all. Ergo's are more forward than a z650, never sat on a z650 doesn't tell me much. KYB suspension in what way is it adjustable? rear preload only or more to play with? would be nice to see some proper acceleration scenes as well rather than just backroad cruising.
I believe it is. Spurgeon mentioned in his companion article that much of the riding went outside San Diego out towards the Mexican Border. That would be Otay Lakes Rd and Campo Rd (94) according to Google Maps. -DrewZilla
Bought my 2019 edition 2 days ago! I can't wait my first big bike since passing my A1 licence. Not going to lie I'm scared shitless but eh 😅😅 gotta start somewhere
So genuine question for everyone here. Im getting a new bike within the next month. Im deciding between this and the Z1000 (2015) with 10K miles. What would be a better choice?
i did a ride on this, its really a nice ride :) only thing i had issues with is that my legs felt a tad to crunched together. the Z800 is a little more roomy and therefor more comfy over time.
It's the housing that comes with the Sena Audio Back for GoPro. -DrewZilla *www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/sena-bluetooth-audio-back-for-gopro-with-waterproof-housing
I like this bike however I wanna see RevZilla do a review on the FZ09. I can't seem to find RevZilla ever doing one. I only found the XSR900 review. also I just saw RevZilla headquarters when I was crusing around Philly on my king pin that was cool I had no idea it was so close
Our FZ-09 long term test was only a written review, though we did feature the FZ-09 in the XSR900 Video Review. -DrewZilla *www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2014-yamaha-fz-09-long-term-test *www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2016-yamaha-xsr900-motorcycle-review
Not sure why they would bother to sleeve down the Z1000 engine at all. Why not just provide lower spec components otherwise, and leave the engine performance alone? Thus you would have a cheaper price, and a significant hp/torque advantage over the midrange competition.
M.R Raghav Z900 if you want super smooth engine with proper litre class type thrills. Street Triple S for better ride quality, superb cornering thrills and triumph service network. 650f if you need better pillion seat and wind protection. My personal choice is Z900. Cheers!
Z1000R in EU. The standard Z1000 was already 12 grand in the USA :\ In Europe now they've added Ohlins, Brembos, stainless brake lines, gear indicator, a bit more power, and other stuff. I can't imagine the price.
We only did a written review on the Ninja 650, but it's very well written by awesome moto-writer Mark Gardiner. -DrewZilla *www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2017-kawasaki-ninja-650-first-ride-motorcycle-review
What difference does it make how I choose MY bike? You're suddenly better than me because what? You prefer the "PURE" form of motorcycling? Fuck off with your bullshit.
The backpack was the Klim Krew Pack (www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/klim-krew-pak) and the bag on my hip was an older Lowepro bag for my DSLR. It is similar to the Toploader Pro 70 AW II (www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1077485-REG/lowepro_lp36773_toploader_pro_70_aw.html) in their new line of bags.
Govinda Shedde No, it has TCS because any rider that actually gets rides besides 80-90F on weekends can use it. FYI fzo9 makes more torque. Try being informed before you spew your bullshit.
Lifted_Above I think "hypocrite" is the wrong word you're looking for. That being said you are correct,the FZ09 makes 65 lb ft where as the Z900 makes 72 lb ft.
It's a camera case for my Canon 5D that mounts to my belt. I was shooting stills for the article in between takes so I needed all of my video and photography gear with me.
I am shopping but unable to test ride. Which do you like better..this or 2017 MT-09? I am 6 feet, 215 with gear, 30 inch inseam, for riding around in the country and occasional track day? No touring, no wheelies, no off road. Others have said the trans gear ratio is too close together? Did you find that off putting on the Z900?
So I haven't ridden the newest version of the MT-09 with the revised suspension and throttle. But I think that the two bikes are fairly closely matched with engine response being the biggest difference (And the fact that the MT-09 has Traction Control and varying throttle modes). The gearing on the Z900 didn't bother me at all, I felt the engine's power felt a bit more manageable in general, not quite as frantic as the MT-09 (I've ridden the older version as well as the XSR900 with the same engine). But, there are a lot of people out there that love the initial snap of the torque of the Yamaha's triple. The problem with the Z900 on the track is that the stock suspension is a bit soft and the foot pegs are a bit low. I didn't realized how relaxed it was until I rode it side-by-side with an R6 at New Jersey Motorsports Park. But the flip side of that is the R6 is a miserable bike to ride on the street with any regularity. Knowing that street riding is your main priority I would just keep in mind that both the Z900 and the MT-09 are going to sacrifice a bit of track-ability... But that can be tweaked.
Spurgeon Dunbar Thanks..a bmw dealer got a 2017 Z900 in on trade and I got a chance to ride it this weekend. Probably me just not being used to it but I found the throttle on it to be a bit abrupt or sudden and at first I even had difficulty shifting smoothly between gears..so I would probably find the xsr 900, mt-09 even more abrupt or sudden correct? I rode a few year old Triumph speed Triple right after it and found the throttle much easier to regulate btw...
Yeah, I think the Z900's throttle is one of the best out there. I am surprised to hear you had problems with it. I like the older Speed Triple's throttle response prior to the electronic setup, but I haven't ridden a throttle-by-wire Speed Triple thus I can't comment on that. I really liked the throttle response on the new Street Triple RS, though.
I'm nowhere near to the level of reviewing chops, or riding skill for that matter, as Spurg, but I own a 2017 Z900 and rode a 2017 FZ-09 the same day as purchase. I personally found the throttle response, fueling and seating position to be far desirable on the Z900. I'm 6'1 and about 200 lbs. with a 32-inch inseam to give an idea of size. The FZ-09 was by no means a bad bike but it didn't fit what I wanted. The throttle was very snappy, the torque (while on paper is less than the Z900) came on very strong and abruptly, and the seating felt like I was on the bike rather than in. Those are just a few small things to add to what Spurgeon had said but that may help. I agree with the good and bad he'd provided on the bike. I really don't have many, if any, glaring complaints about the bike to be honest aside from maybe the stock tires not inspiring confidence.
Spurgeon prides himself on collecting these elusive dollar store Wayfarer knock-offs from wherever he can find them, but we've got a similar pair on our site too. Check them out! -TeamZilla Chris *www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/zans-winna-sunglasses
I bought those at a roadside stand in Baja, Mexico. If you head down to San Felipe on a Saturday night and walk along the strip you should be able to find the same pair. If you pay more than $80 pesos (roughly $4 dollars) you're getting ripped off.
Its all about the character of the bike, on paper they're nearly identical, but when riding them, the z900 has a turbine smooth engine, while the FZ-09 has a torquey yet flavourless engine. Also, the suspension on the FZ is rubbish, you simply cannot push that bike.
Govinda Shedde They fixed the FZ09 suspension and throttle issue this year along with giving it ABS all for less than the Z900 in my area at least. Unless it's considerably less than the Yamaha, I don't see it threatening the FZ. They should have just worked on the Z1000 and competed with the FZ10 instead and introduced competition for the FZ07 which is killing the market in sales.
Bredaxe rode both of them back to back, the FZ 09 definitely has improved suspension over the old one, but it still doesn't inspire confidence especially when you push it hard, I suspect it's the low weight of the bike that makes the suspension so jittery
hello sir. I am having trouble deciding between two bikes. the triumph street triple 765 and the Kawasaki z900. I'm 6'1 , 215 lbs . I'm from India so the road conditions are average. also here, Kawasaki is a way lot cheaper than the 765. please help me decide which one I should buy. I'm only gonna ride it on roads not tracks. and ps- riding modes not a deciding factor, only the all-round performance matters. please help me out. anyone !?!
Z900 makes more peak torque and more peak HP. Factoring in the extra weight, it still makes more power from midrange-to-top. Also per my test, much smoother engine overall.
So, let me see if I got this right: compared with the new Street Triple 765 R/RS it has the same power, it weighs 50 pounds more, it doesn't have traction control, it has much more basic suspension and brakes and it sits in a higher insurance group. Yeah, it seems like a winner for Kawasaki...
I don't know why people complain about the Z1000 suspension. It's easy to adjust the front and rear. I love my 2016 Z1000. The Z900 looks better than the new FZ09, but the FZ09 would destroy this in every sense especially when it comes to fancy gizmos like TC and immediate power.
Z900 wins for me too. I've tested FZ and Z. It's the sort of thing you can't quantify on a spec sheet, even though the spec sheet for the Z is better in where it counts.
I stopped watching when he said your hands will be touching the tank on tighter turning situations. That's too bad because I found a new 2017 w/abs at a local shop for $5800.
I wish Kawasaki would make a fully faired version of this bike and call it the ninja 900.. I like faired bikes better but don't want an aggressive stance. Most likely I will buy a used zzr600 on the market for less than $4000.
I heard they modified the airbox to give it a unique intake sound but i have z800 and i think it already has a nice howl to it. Anyone ride both that can compare them?
Jesse Rueda Not yet, I own a z800 also just waiting for my dealer to get a z900 in. Other riders I talked to say it handles the curves a little better from the weight loss and has a bit more topend. As a heavier guy I felt the z800 was perfect.
REPVILE Do you think you would be willing yo replace your z800 with the z900? I really like my 800 so far and I'm pretty average height and weight. Just wish i was about an inch taller haha
Jesse Rueda At the moment no. I really love the z800, its faster than Ill ever need, handles fantastic imho (220lb) rider, and I picked it up out the door for less than an FZ07. I know looks are subjective, I really like the the aesthetics of the z800 over the z900. Granted my opinion could change when I can test ride one.
Hope i can win this prize to help me get started with the love and passion of bikes. I have been watching this channel a lot just never subscribed due to remembering the name. Great channel and helped me find my gear for the future.
People be all about the computers these days. If manufacturers didn't disclose what sort of electronics or lack of them that were being used, riders would be forced to evaluate a bike based on experience instead.
if you are so short on money you shouldnt get a new bike.the z1000 is the better Money/Bike deal. or get a 2016 Z1000 with maybe 1000-2000KM on it for the price of the new z900...
Better better better better better better better better. I'm sure it would please the whole world if someone got a better bike than another bike which isn't as better.
So if people have limited budgets they should only get the used bikes that you recommend. Got it. Do you have mandatory colors or can the financially limited choose that part for themselves?
I've not ridden the 2014+ Z1000. But I did ride the new Z900. It's almost the same power to weight ratio, but the traction feedback, chassis balance, engine sublime power and control are all so well matched and balanced. It's a super machine. Highly recommend riding one if you can.
This bike doesn't make sense, you drop the triple that is in the biggest market, then neuter the 4 cyl and get rid of top of the range naked bikes. You just messed up two classes of bikes Kawasaki, clap clap.........
Well for me this bike is one of the very few naked bikes that actually doesn't look ugly as fuck... Most of the nakeds look really great, especially the rear and mid sections, but as soon as I see the front it's an instant turn off.
The Z900 is so plain jane looking. I think the Z1000 looks better. I'd take a new left over 2016 Z1000 over this any day. Probably only a thousand more for better suspension and brakes.
Every way. Stock suspension? Engine smoothness? Engine overall power? Weight? Stability? Handling balance? Aftermarket response? Ergonomics? Fit and finish? Sound? Cost? A lot to consider.
*1043cc. Z900 is 948cc achieved by smaller bores, same stroke as the 1043cc. I've considered the updated Ninja1000 with all it's cool tech. With exhaust and battery swap, it would drop 26-27 pounds instantly. 489-490 pounds wet. The 5 gallon tank is appealing as well, for being a part "tourer." I'm glad they didn't install a thimble for a tank on the Z900. Every other midsized sport bike seems to get a smaller tank every redesign. It's annoying.
I hate these NAKED bikes! I think they're just disgusting & tacky looking. Maybe they'll eventually grow on me, but I'll never see myself buying one! Then again I hated the Busa at 1st & now I'm a happy Busa owner. 😒😏
Jared Bellard Please note that I said that I hated the Busa at one point until it grew on me! Riding a Busa doesn't make me bias, I just like what I like & hate what I hate, but in general I appreciate all bikes, even the girly Spyders! 😁
I know you guys hear this all the time, but the production quality of your videos is incredible and Spurg and Lemmy are excellent reviewers, keep up the excellent work!
Thanks for the kind words man. I am lucky in the fact that I get to spend all day working with one of my best friends. Even more so considering "motorcycles" are our "work"!!
Good review and video! I just got a 2019 Z900, I like the Z900 so much! It’s comfortable, light, and powerful and fast!
No "sleeving" going on in modern aluminum engines. Aluminum alloy walls with high tech extremely hard and durable coatings. This 948cc lump has a custom head, cams, valves, pistons, lightened crank and flywheel. Same stroke as the 1043, smaller bores.
The smaller bores means smaller valves. Usually a less over-square bore/stroke ratio means smaller valves and smaller throttle bodies for higher intake velocities (more grunt at lower RPM). Depending on intake and exhaust valve timing overlap, the engine can be very torque-biased. And it is. Per my own demo of the bike, it's EXTREMELY smooth, idle to redline. Very progressive power, a lot of torque right out of the hole, good low gearing to start, nice highway gearing for cruising.
Chassis is very precise and provides great feedback to the rider (hands, butt, feet). Throttle feel is excellent without much of a lurch on/off throttle. No problem with throttle control.
Steering/leaning is very neutral, no funky fall-in or readjusting lines mid-corner. Just rails and provides very good traction information to the rider. Transmission is super slick. No missed shifts or clunky action. Just precise refined function. It doesn't need traction control or power modes. Chassis doesn't feel like it's going to flex when things get quick and dicey.
It's so good providing tire communication to the rider, one could easily learn the limits without overstepping them. I've owned a 2006 ZX-6R which vibrated badly at higher rpm. I've owned a 2007 Z1000 which had a 953cc engine based on the older ZX-9R block. It also vibrated a little here and there, and torque wasn't nearly as linear or responsive. It weighed just over 500 pounds and was down on power and torque in comparison. Also had a 190 rear tire and didn't steer neutrally at all. This Z900 is miles beyond those bikes in refinement (engine) and control (compared to Z1000). It's not bland or boring. It's seriously quick. Launch with a wheelie right out of the hole and fly. It's almost the power-to-weight ratio of the stock Z1000. It's quick.
Compared to the 2016 FZ-09 I tested the other year, this chassis and suspension setup is FAR better stock. It's very solid feeling without being harsh. It's well balanced front to back. It's not see-sawing around under throttle, it just gets the job done. Pin it and fly. Wheelies would be easy, but it won't do them unless told to. It's much more confidence inspiring. From what I've read somewhere, the spring rates from factory are for a 170 pound person. I'm just above that and I felt fine. The engine has an advantage in power-to-weight from about 5,000 to redline. Below that it's a tiny bit less than the FZ, but it's still very strong and comes down to the weight of the rider honestly. Engine is smoother than the triple, noticeably. No buzz at ANY rpm.
Tunes with full exhaust and filter show on Akrapovic's dyno to be 125 and 73 at the wheel. Weight loss brings it into the 440's pound range. Going to be a real challenge for the FZ. It's not a typical twist-and-wait 4-banger. No. It pulls out of the hole. Super engine they've made.
There's already a Z-cup racing series for the 900 in Europe. Check it out on TH-cam. Bike is proving itself.
Seat is garbage. What's new? Very few stock seats on any sporty bike these days are worth anything. I'd get it refoamed (thicker pad) and reupholstered for my liking. No biggee.
Also a 3-liter larger fuel tank is a big deal for me, comparing to the FZ.
I'm considering buying one.
I believe the smaller bores are for more block rigidity since the engine is a load bearing part of the frame
i’ve been riding the z900 for about a year and man oh man! it’s a really great bike. i went from only riding dirtbikes, straight to the z900 and it’s a really powerful bike. you could be in 6th gear and that throttle will still have torque… i love the bike and i really recomend it for anyone looking to get a powerful naked bike. although it is important to not hop on it without experience. the bike is no joke
The fz 09 is rambo, this bike is james bond. Both are lethal, take your pick.
I'm hoping this color z900 is my next. And new purchase after 30 years! Insurance might make the choice to a smaller bike? I hope not!!!!! Lol
Only thing I like about the fz09 is the triple cylinder.
I have a z900 performance edition in green :) thanks for the video as there hasn't been much coverage on the z900 as of yet! .. I originally wanted the gsx s750 or 1000, however being 6'2 I felt I was sat over the tank .. I went for the z900 as it felt more natural to be sat in the tank .. :) rider modes don't bother me as the bike is smooth in every gear (smooth pull) so I'd never see the need to reduce the power, the only bad side is the...seat, I'm going to get my seat tailored (foam and soft material) as anything around an hour is uncomfy! Great video
Ethan W
Hi I am planning to get a bike
N I am confused btw z900 and Suzuki s1000
I heard s1000 have some throttle issues n z900 is quite smooth to ride
Could u please recommend me which one to go for
N I stay at a place where u can expect a lot of traffic
Thank u
Tarun Malik Blindly get the Z900
Great review, love the tall rider/weight comments! To all the young riders kawasaki was having an identity crisis, 800? 1000? If youre older you may want an inline 4, and a 900 is what kawasaki is known for. Some people want a "standard" standard bike, ironically rare as it is.
the whole middleweight naked market looks so good at the moment it all depends what you're after. if you're starting out go for good ergonomics and less power if you want best suspension and cornering i think the new triumph street triple takes that crown at least at the RS model. for torque its the MT09/FZ09 (MT=Master of Torque) remember that if you want more you have to pay more. the top of the line naked bikes like the aprilia tuono or the superduke 1290r or the mv agusta brutale range are the ones that tick all the boxes but come at a much higher price point. my advice would be to pick the bike that makes you smile EVERY time you throw your leg over it. if you do that you'll soon forget any flaws that every bike inevitably has. biking is about passion not statistics. for me anyway
The Z900 has more torque than the MT 09.
then i'd say ride both, it will probably come down to comfort and feel. where does this sit in comparison to the mt09 in price?
What do you think about the tuono then...Its on top of my list but I'm concerned about its reliability. I don't want to put a large chunk of money on something that is prone to break down...should I or shouldn't I...?
stratshredder I’ve owned a 1050 Speed Triple , loved that bike, down economy forced sale. I replaced it this year with a used 2013 v4 Tuono and have put 5k on it with 0 troubles. Shit you not, best bike I’ve ever owned. On that list was a ninja 600, zx7, ZX10R, zx9, two zx11s, VMAX, Ducati 888 Ltd, Honda Magna, Vrod, gsxr 750, gsxr 1100...and more you get the drift. If you want a bike that you wanna ride all of the time and make any excuses to do so, buy a Tuono or Speed Triple
I still love my 2004 ZRX 1200R! If I had to replace it .... the Z900 would be on my radar. Thanks for the review.
I like that kawasaki didn't add all those pointless rider aids
Dat moto boi The z800 didn't need it I doubt this would benefit from them either.
I'm 6'4" so this is interesting. I have the Z800 and the size is almost perfect. The FZ-09 felt like a toy bike when sitting on it. It was just too small.
TierIIIGamer I’m only 6’1” and I was worried about that as it seems kinda small.
I’m probably testing an MT-09 when I get closer to adding another bike to my stable (probably later this year, I’m a year-round commuter). I’m between three JDM standards and the Triumph Speed Triple. I owned a Vulcan awhile back, but I keep forgetting Kawasaki when I go looking. X-/
lol people hating saying get the FZ09 instead. Sure, the FZ09 maybe better but this is a bit more unique, not that commom, and I'd say looks better.
agreed, the fz09 is ugly as fuck
Cody Thompson i don't think so
The 2017 FZ-09 recieved a bunch of updates including some small visual improvements.
For about the same price you get more with the FZ-09 in a lighter overall package.
I'd pick the Yamaha over the Kawi.
Aesthetics? Meh. It's like asking a group of guys if a particular girl is pretty or not. This Z900 isn't a Honda NM4.
I think they both look great. I prefer the motor on the Z much more. It's a ripper.
The Kawi has the better motor and chassis. The fit and finish is far superior. Suspension and brakes are also better and the throttle response is in a different league. The Kawi has masses of instant grunt everywhere [more than the FZ09] ,plus a wailing top end the Yam cannot match. I have ridden both and the Kawi is definitely the better bike.
You guys should review the 2020 Z900.
I think Kawi went the correct route with this bike for the most part.. at 1K less than the Street Triple both with ABS its a serious competitor.. I'd wager that the FZ09 will give it a real run for its money with all of its electronics.. Having said that for me the Z900 takes a back seat to the Yammie and Triumph,
Electronics are fine, but they don't give any "running for money" as that's down to the actual mechanical experience of a given bike. Yamaha cost a little more. It's probably slightly better at the value proposition, but at around 9 grand, people aren't splitting up dollars.
MCN tested the new Z900 against the 2017 MT 09 [FZ 09] and the Kwacker out performed it and won the test. The MT just couldn't live with the Zed even though it is lighter and has electronic rider aids. The Zed has plusher better suspension which helped it through the turns while the Yam got flighty and difficult to control. The Zed had more grunt and a screaming top end which the Yam couldn't live with. They are testing the Zed against the new Triumph 765 Street Triple next so that should be really interesting to see who comes out on top.
Yes I've seen the magazine cover pics online and saw a short clip of Neevs saying the Z more or less trounced the MT. No videos online yet. Want to see this shootout.
This bike is targeted at someone like myself in their 30's to 40's that used to ride sport bikes back in the day and don't want all the fancy rider aids. I'm not trying to ride the longest wheelies or drag knee on the street these days. I just want a simple straight forward badass bike for a good price. Kawi hit the nail on the head for me. Time to go ride my spankin new Z900!
Sounds like they've built your machine! In the same way, the Z1000 is that machine but more of a sledgehammer.
I noticed that you're on Otay Lakes road east of Chula Vista! I ride there all the time.
Lol I was about to write the same...... yes it's nice road you go from there campo road highway 94 to julian san ysabel
Absolutely love your straight up reviews ...thanks
First bike/overall bike? As long as you have control over yourself?
Just bought one today👍🏿
Hows it been?
in all what would you recommend, fz10 or z900?
That's not a fair comparison. The FZ-10 is nearly $5,000 more with an additional 40 horsepower, electronic cruise control, four-stage traction control, better suspension, and better brakes. If money wasn't an object I would easily pick the FZ-10, but the Z900 packs a hell of a punch for those of us living in the real world where money is always an object.
Weird, my quote for this is only 600 full coverage for a year.
For Mt07 is over 2000 and my 09 is over 3000.
For sv650 and cb650f is 571
for Suzuki gsx s750 is over 1000.
I don't get how this Kawasaki is cheaper than those and vice versa. But I am glad because I was about to pull the trigger in a couple days. Now I can get the z900 without regrets.
What happened to the z1000 streetfighter? Because I love the look of the 2014 version
is there a difference spec wise between the z900 2017 and a 2019?
Its weird, I live in Tulare county central Cali, and never have been out to San Diego. This area looks identical to our foothills here. Especially in southern Tulare County down to Northern Kern and the area near Lake Isabelka.
Hey, I'm 17 and about to do my CBT. I live in the U.K. and don't know what to get for my first 125. If anyone could give me some advice it would be much appreciated
KTM RC 125 all the way. Do NOT get a grom/ kawi z125, those are toys.
Hello ethan. Get a cheap supermoto LEXMOTO around £2000, get new tyres because the standard ones are dangerous but great bike. After you get the A2 license buy a nice middle weight naked bike like honda cb500F or z650. Ride safe
Please comment on the throttle response and the clutch/transmission smoothness.
Can you do more on the Z900 now. Pretty please. Before I go out and spend a premium on the fz-10.
Stay tuned for later this month! -DrewZilla
Clicked the bell. I'm ready ha.
This is probably the fastest thing you can get for 8k. Short of a used liter bike. The power for the price seems unbeatable. Especially when you think that the MV 800 tcosts almost 20k out the door....
Aw man! You were in my neck of the woods! Love the old 94!
I see the FZ09 as the main competitor for this bike. The street triple has always been a step up from the Japanese bikes. If you are a rider looking at buying a new Street Triple then you are probably deciding between the base model Street Triple and the R model rather than deciding between Triumph and Kawasaki.
My riding buddy and room mate has a 2017 fz 09. I've put in maybe 100 miles on his bike. It is a great great machine for the money. I have only sat on a z900. I think that ultimately it is going to come down to ergonomics and whether or not you need that triple engine. The triple in the FZ 09 is a great engine, I think it is going to sway a lot of people in Yamaha's direction. I find the z900's ergos to be more similar to my Honda CB919's ergonomics, and I personally like that.
Regardless of which way you would choose to go, I think it is a great time to be interested in an almost liter sized naked.
Good to read that 919 reference in your comment. I missed out on two low priced, CB919's last year while shopping used bikes. Just cause I found a good deal and liked the ergos' of the VStrom for my re-riding purposes, I bought a nicely farkled up, '11 DL650. Getting my riding chops back after 15+ years off. Just maybe this Z900 might be the next, new bike I buy next year or so. Last two bikes I owned were '81 KZ550LTD and '01 KLR650. Guess I will just always bleed green, lol.
How does it compare to older z1000 or newer mt09 Yamaha
Love my Kawasaki z400
only thing mentioned about the handling is that it goes where you look easily? doesn't tell me much at all. Ergo's are more forward than a z650, never sat on a z650 doesn't tell me much. KYB suspension in what way is it adjustable? rear preload only or more to play with? would be nice to see some proper acceleration scenes as well rather than just backroad cruising.
is this otay lakes headin into town. I ride here all the time
I believe it is. Spurgeon mentioned in his companion article that much of the riding went outside San Diego out towards the Mexican Border. That would be Otay Lakes Rd and Campo Rd (94) according to Google Maps. -DrewZilla
Will you guys be doing a review for the new 2017 Yamaha R6?
Bought my 2019 edition 2 days ago! I can't wait my first big bike since passing my A1 licence. Not going to lie I'm scared shitless but eh 😅😅 gotta start somewhere
So genuine question for everyone here. Im getting a new bike within the next month. Im deciding between this and the Z1000 (2015) with 10K miles. What would be a better choice?
i did a ride on this, its really a nice ride :) only thing i had issues with is that my legs felt a tad to crunched together. the Z800 is a little more roomy and therefor more comfy over time.
What is that case he used with the camera on his handlebars?
It's the housing that comes with the Sena Audio Back for GoPro. -DrewZilla
*www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/sena-bluetooth-audio-back-for-gopro-with-waterproof-housing
Thanks!
I like this bike however I wanna see RevZilla do a review on the FZ09. I can't seem to find RevZilla ever doing one. I only found the XSR900 review. also I just saw RevZilla headquarters when I was crusing around Philly on my king pin that was cool I had no idea it was so close
Our FZ-09 long term test was only a written review, though we did feature the FZ-09 in the XSR900 Video Review. -DrewZilla
*www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2014-yamaha-fz-09-long-term-test
*www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2016-yamaha-xsr900-motorcycle-review
Where is this beautiful place 🤩
C A L I F O R N I A
Are you using a GoPro? Your camera is creating halos on all the landscaping.
Yes, it's a GoPro. -DrewZilla
Not sure why they would bother to sleeve down the Z1000 engine at all. Why not just provide lower spec components otherwise, and leave the engine performance alone? Thus you would have a cheaper price, and a significant hp/torque advantage over the midrange competition.
Insurance purposes. The bike makes almost the same power as the outgoing Z1000 while being 30 pounds lighter. But it isn't a full liter bike.
greg alford And has a bit faster top end. Ive seen at least one video gpsd at 157. Thats faster than Ill ever need to go.
we still have the z1000 here in germany hehehehe
How would you compare this with say a CBR 650f or closer a street triple S (base model) these are my options
M.R Raghav Z900 if you want super smooth engine with proper litre class type thrills. Street Triple S for better ride quality, superb cornering thrills and triumph service network. 650f if you need better pillion seat and wind protection. My personal choice is Z900.
Cheers!
Will Kawasaki be replacing the z1000 with a new Version to compete with all the other liter naked bikes
Probably in Europe...but not for the US market. -DrewZilla
Z1000R in EU. The standard Z1000 was already 12 grand in the USA :\ In Europe now they've added Ohlins, Brembos, stainless brake lines, gear indicator, a bit more power, and other stuff. I can't imagine the price.
are you guys planning on trying out the new ninja 650?
We only did a written review on the Ninja 650, but it's very well written by awesome moto-writer Mark Gardiner. -DrewZilla
*www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2017-kawasaki-ninja-650-first-ride-motorcycle-review
I'd still take the FZ09 over this since its refresh now has TC & ABS.
they both have crappy KYB forks so both equally bad.
If that is what makes you choose one bike over the other you don't belong m8, go check electric cars
What difference does it make how I choose MY bike? You're suddenly better than me because what? You prefer the "PURE" form of motorcycling? Fuck off with your bullshit.
shin888 it's all about how a bike makes you feel when you ride it. looking at specs on paper when making a decision is the stupidest thing you can do
phil tripe they are around $9k did you expect ölins?
How does he bare the wind on his face with the visor up?
I never ride with the visor down during daylight hours. Wind doesn't bother me at all. Occasionally a bee gets stuck in there though.... #notsofun
what are the two bags in the video (back pack, hip bag)?
The backpack was the Klim Krew Pack (www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/klim-krew-pak) and the bag on my hip was an older Lowepro bag for my DSLR. It is similar to the Toploader Pro 70 AW II (www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1077485-REG/lowepro_lp36773_toploader_pro_70_aw.html) in their new line of bags.
I just don't get the transformer styling, all angles and no beautiful lines. Maybe I'm just too old.
I dont get the constant references to the transformers. Been hearing a lot of that lately.
The FZ-09 has traction control because its targeting riders that dont have wrist control.
Govinda Shedde It has traction control and ABS to appeal to a wider target audience. This is why the FZ is the leader of the group.
twist of the wrist 2?
Govinda Shedde No, it has TCS because any rider that actually gets rides besides 80-90F on weekends can use it. FYI fzo9 makes more torque. Try being informed before you spew your bullshit.
Zalonka, don't be a hypocrite. Z900 makes more torque.
Lifted_Above I think "hypocrite" is the wrong word you're looking for. That being said you are correct,the FZ09 makes 65 lb ft where as the Z900 makes 72 lb ft.
What's up with Arai's chin vent?
That's just their design. It rotates to open. -DrewZilla
i knw its not class or forte type of bike bt can u review yahama sr 400 or 500. please do reply to this so i dont wait fr it..
It's possible but unlikely we'll review them. I apologize for any inconvenience. -DrewZilla
RevZilla thanks
What kinda of fanny pouch are you wearing and why? Audio recorder in there?
It's a camera case for my Canon 5D that mounts to my belt. I was shooting stills for the article in between takes so I needed all of my video and photography gear with me.
whats your mic setup for doing your reviews?
kevin robb these guys never give out that info from what Ive seen.
Thats odd, but thanks.
I am shopping but unable to test ride. Which do you like better..this or 2017 MT-09? I am 6 feet, 215 with gear, 30 inch inseam, for riding around in the country and occasional track day? No touring, no wheelies, no off road. Others have said the trans gear ratio is too close together? Did you find that off putting on the Z900?
So I haven't ridden the newest version of the MT-09 with the revised suspension and throttle. But I think that the two bikes are fairly closely matched with engine response being the biggest difference (And the fact that the MT-09 has Traction Control and varying throttle modes). The gearing on the Z900 didn't bother me at all, I felt the engine's power felt a bit more manageable in general, not quite as frantic as the MT-09 (I've ridden the older version as well as the XSR900 with the same engine). But, there are a lot of people out there that love the initial snap of the torque of the Yamaha's triple.
The problem with the Z900 on the track is that the stock suspension is a bit soft and the foot pegs are a bit low. I didn't realized how relaxed it was until I rode it side-by-side with an R6 at New Jersey Motorsports Park. But the flip side of that is the R6 is a miserable bike to ride on the street with any regularity. Knowing that street riding is your main priority I would just keep in mind that both the Z900 and the MT-09 are going to sacrifice a bit of track-ability... But that can be tweaked.
Spurgeon Dunbar Thanks..a bmw dealer got a 2017 Z900 in on trade and I got a chance to ride it this weekend. Probably me just not being used to it but I found the throttle on it to be a bit abrupt or sudden and at first I even had difficulty shifting smoothly between gears..so I would probably find the xsr 900, mt-09 even more abrupt or sudden correct? I rode a few year old Triumph speed Triple right after it and found the throttle much easier to regulate btw...
Yeah, I think the Z900's throttle is one of the best out there. I am surprised to hear you had problems with it. I like the older Speed Triple's throttle response prior to the electronic setup, but I haven't ridden a throttle-by-wire Speed Triple thus I can't comment on that. I really liked the throttle response on the new Street Triple RS, though.
Spurgeon Dunbar Thanks.
I'm nowhere near to the level of reviewing chops, or riding skill for that matter, as Spurg, but I own a 2017 Z900 and rode a 2017 FZ-09 the same day as purchase.
I personally found the throttle response, fueling and seating position to be far desirable on the Z900. I'm 6'1 and about 200 lbs. with a 32-inch inseam to give an idea of size.
The FZ-09 was by no means a bad bike but it didn't fit what I wanted. The throttle was very snappy, the torque (while on paper is less than the Z900) came on very strong and abruptly, and the seating felt like I was on the bike rather than in.
Those are just a few small things to add to what Spurgeon had said but that may help. I agree with the good and bad he'd provided on the bike. I really don't have many, if any, glaring complaints about the bike to be honest aside from maybe the stock tires not inspiring confidence.
What kind of bag you you have on your belt?
It's a camera holster bag for my Canon 5D. I was shooting stills for the article in between video takes.
Spurgeon Dunbar huh... I guess my search for a nice bag met concrete wall all over again 😭
Nice sunglasses, where can I get those?
Spurgeon prides himself on collecting these elusive dollar store Wayfarer knock-offs from wherever he can find them, but we've got a similar pair on our site too. Check them out! -TeamZilla Chris
*www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/zans-winna-sunglasses
I bought those at a roadside stand in Baja, Mexico. If you head down to San Felipe on a Saturday night and walk along the strip you should be able to find the same pair. If you pay more than $80 pesos (roughly $4 dollars) you're getting ripped off.
Looks nice but why buy this over the mt-09?
Or the new speed triple for that mather
I guess it's for people who like inline 4's, other than that, the MT 09 is a hard bike to beat in it's category
Its all about the character of the bike, on paper they're nearly identical, but when riding them, the z900 has a turbine smooth engine, while the FZ-09 has a torquey yet flavourless engine. Also, the suspension on the FZ is rubbish, you simply cannot push that bike.
Govinda Shedde They fixed the FZ09 suspension and throttle issue this year along with giving it ABS all for less than the Z900 in my area at least. Unless it's considerably less than the Yamaha, I don't see it threatening the FZ. They should have just worked on the Z1000 and competed with the FZ10 instead and introduced competition for the FZ07 which is killing the market in sales.
Bredaxe rode both of them back to back, the FZ 09 definitely has improved suspension over the old one, but it still doesn't inspire confidence especially when you push it hard, I suspect it's the low weight of the bike that makes the suspension so jittery
So why get this if the new street triple has basically the same power but weighs 40 kg's less?
The Z900 is cheaper and has more torque. The Triumph is lighter but more expensive. -DrewZilla
hello sir. I am having trouble deciding between two bikes. the triumph street triple 765 and the Kawasaki z900. I'm 6'1 , 215 lbs . I'm from India so the road conditions are average. also here, Kawasaki is a way lot cheaper than the 765. please help me decide which one I should buy. I'm only gonna ride it on roads not tracks. and ps- riding modes not a deciding factor, only the all-round performance matters. please help me out. anyone !?!
The 765 is a great bike, but I'd go with the Z900 in your circumstance. -DrewZilla
RevZilla thanks alot sir.! does riding aids really play an important role ?
They can help, but you also must consider the cost. -DrewZilla
RevZilla there's almost $2250 difference in the price of both the models sir.
which is alot with respect to the Indian market. thanks for the help. it means a lot :) you guys are awesome btw. love your work ❤️
Why do people like a triple more than an I-4? Wouldn't you want an I-4 over 3 cylinders?
Sparrow Because of the torque of the triple
Z900 makes more peak torque and more peak HP. Factoring in the extra weight, it still makes more power from midrange-to-top. Also per my test, much smoother engine overall.
Your not getting the z1000?
Z1000R in Europe only. Z900 in the USA replaces 1000 and 800. Kawasaki wasn't fooling around either, it's a sweet machine and a worthy replacement.
What jacket is that
Alpinestars Brera
Please do a street rod review
It's coming. -DrewZilla
*www.revzilla.com/common-tread/2017-harley-davidson-street-rod-first-ride-motorcycle-review
I think the headlight is a combination between Z800 and Z1000's
So, let me see if I got this right: compared with the new Street Triple 765 R/RS it has the same power, it weighs 50 pounds more, it doesn't have traction control, it has much more basic suspension and brakes and it sits in a higher insurance group. Yeah, it seems like a winner for Kawasaki...
But at least it doesn't have bug eyes. :)
Ricardo Lourizela it also MSRP's for 5k less. you can get a ZX10R for the same price as an RS around here. More power, better suspension, etc...
You moron. $13500 to $19500 here in Australia. No way the street triple is that much better
Yeah but then you have to tell your family you ride a Striple. :)
It depends on where you leave, obviously. Here in France the 765 Street Triple R is only €1300 more expensive than the Z900...
So Z650 review coming out soon
Tested this bike last saurday, loved IT but its price y compare to MT09
Z900 is cheaper than mt09 in Australia
how many cc the motorcycle have
lol
15cc
All of them.
i think the new street tripple is a better package...
I don't know why people complain about the Z1000 suspension. It's easy to adjust the front and rear. I love my 2016 Z1000. The Z900 looks better than the new FZ09, but the FZ09 would destroy this in every sense especially when it comes to fancy gizmos like TC and immediate power.
Nope. Z900 wins.
Z900 wins for me too. I've tested FZ and Z. It's the sort of thing you can't quantify on a spec sheet, even though the spec sheet for the Z is better in where it counts.
I stopped watching when he said your hands will be touching the tank on tighter turning situations. That's too bad because I found a new 2017 w/abs at a local shop for $5800.
Whats the drive out?
I am going to get one next week
Curious what you guys eneded up with otd
Nice review
I wish Kawasaki would make a fully faired version of this bike and call it the ninja 900.. I like faired bikes better but don't want an aggressive stance. Most likely I will buy a used zzr600 on the market for less than $4000.
NinJayMan a Versys 900 based in this engine would be the sweetest deal in this segment!
I heard they modified the airbox to give it a unique intake sound but i have z800 and i think it already has a nice howl to it. Anyone ride both that can compare them?
Jesse Rueda Not yet, I own a z800 also just waiting for my dealer to get a z900 in. Other riders I talked to say it handles the curves a little better from the weight loss and has a bit more topend. As a heavier guy I felt the z800 was perfect.
I have ridden both. I thought the Z800 sounded good, this one is even better.
Spurgeon Dunbar No one better to asnwer this than the reviewer himself 👌 Thanks Spurgeon, youre the man!
REPVILE Do you think you would be willing yo replace your z800 with the z900? I really like my 800 so far and I'm pretty average height and weight. Just wish i was about an inch taller haha
Jesse Rueda At the moment no. I really love the z800, its faster than Ill ever need, handles fantastic imho (220lb) rider, and I picked it up out the door for less than an FZ07. I know looks are subjective, I really like the the aesthetics of the z800 over the z900. Granted my opinion could change when I can test ride one.
my height is 5"4
Will it be okay for my height?
It might be ok for your height. I recommend you go to a dealer and sit on one. -DrewZilla
RevZilla thank you very much sir
I'm from india, your reviews are best, namaste from my country and I'm going tomorrow to see the bike
Triumph RS, lighter, more power, more refined. Good review though, thank you Revzilla! #c2warmy ;)
And way more expensive. Naturally.
Beast!
The original z900 was a game changer in its day don't see that happening with this @ all
Hope i can win this prize to help me get started with the love and passion of bikes. I have been watching this channel a lot just never subscribed due to remembering the name. Great channel and helped me find my gear for the future.
I like Lenny the best for motorcycle reviews
460lbs = 208kgs
looks like a super duke
They lost me at "no advanced electronics". Yamaha wins this one!
People be all about the computers these days. If manufacturers didn't disclose what sort of electronics or lack of them that were being used, riders would be forced to evaluate a bike based on experience instead.
why get a Z900 if you get for 3000€ more a Z1000?
BlackForest Biker If you dont have the 3000 euro extra
Weight. Insurance. Tires. Fuel consumption. Harshness. Agility. Many reasons. It's not as simple as an engine displacement number.
if you are so short on money you shouldnt get a new bike.the z1000 is the better Money/Bike deal. or get a 2016 Z1000 with maybe 1000-2000KM on it for the price of the new z900...
Better better better better better better better better. I'm sure it would please the whole world if someone got a better bike than another bike which isn't as better.
So if people have limited budgets they should only get the used bikes that you recommend. Got it. Do you have mandatory colors or can the financially limited choose that part for themselves?
make me wanna trade my z1000 of for something else..
I've not ridden the 2014+ Z1000. But I did ride the new Z900. It's almost the same power to weight ratio, but the traction feedback, chassis balance, engine sublime power and control are all so well matched and balanced. It's a super machine. Highly recommend riding one if you can.
This bike doesn't make sense, you drop the triple that is in the biggest market, then neuter the 4 cyl and get rid of top of the range naked bikes. You just messed up two classes of bikes Kawasaki, clap clap.........
What is with all the god awful looking headlights coming out these days!
Well for me this bike is one of the very few naked bikes that actually doesn't look ugly as fuck... Most of the nakeds look really great, especially the rear and mid sections, but as soon as I see the front it's an instant turn off.
ilike it rede on
Go back to school and watch how the EU does the tests ...🙃
Ugly mirrors but otherwise awesome!
The Z900 is so plain jane looking. I think the Z1000 looks better. I'd take a new left over 2016 Z1000 over this any day. Probably only a thousand more for better suspension and brakes.
Both this bike and the fz-09 have shit suspension.
i want a great daily ride and a road bike not a dumbazz wheelie machine
Fz 09 = Street triple >>z900
that is all.
And that is wrong. Go ride them.
I just think the Yamaha FZ09 has got this bike beat in every way.
PistolPete63 yup, kawi decided to put the same ole 4 cyli motor in it... love that fz09 3 cyli
Every way.
Stock suspension?
Engine smoothness?
Engine overall power?
Weight?
Stability?
Handling balance?
Aftermarket response?
Ergonomics?
Fit and finish?
Sound?
Cost?
A lot to consider.
I had a 2015 Ninja 1000 for awhile and the 1048 cc version of this motor was terrific.
*1043cc.
Z900 is 948cc achieved by smaller bores, same stroke as the 1043cc.
I've considered the updated Ninja1000 with all it's cool tech. With exhaust and battery swap, it would drop 26-27 pounds instantly. 489-490 pounds wet. The 5 gallon tank is appealing as well, for being a part "tourer."
I'm glad they didn't install a thimble for a tank on the Z900. Every other midsized sport bike seems to get a smaller tank every redesign. It's annoying.
Nope. MCN tested them both and the Kwack won. Faster ,gruntier , better more plush suspension and better/quicker through the turns.
First
man that Triumph is ugly
I hate these NAKED bikes! I think they're just disgusting & tacky looking. Maybe they'll eventually grow on me, but I'll never see myself buying one! Then again I hated the Busa at 1st & now I'm a happy Busa owner. 😒😏
Lee V. TV Of course someone who rides a busa would make this comment.
Jared Bellard Please note that I said that I hated the Busa at one point until it grew on me! Riding a Busa doesn't make me bias, I just like what I like & hate what I hate, but in general I appreciate all bikes, even the girly Spyders! 😁