And banks send recovery agents and even rowdies for people who take few thousands and under 5 -10 lakhs. For 10 years the borrower has not paid singe rupee.WOW and they want a mediation.
It is high time the govt (aka sbi) steps in and gives at least 20,000 cr loan to each Lalit Modi and Nirav Modi and mallya to show how it is done. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1
Yes mr mark, but for that to happen, congress should be in power right, loan was given in congress time
In the last 5 years the govt has written off loans worth 10 lakh crores. which is equal 10,00,000,00,00,000 ₹. The businesses the loans were written off. that data is not shared with the public. You should try and ask the govt whose money has been written off good luck with. I just made a fun analogy with 20,000 crores. it is just a joke
5 วันที่ผ่านมา
@MarkSamraj writting off includes bad assests of private banks and PSU banks as well and most of the loans were given in congress government in power, converted idiots like you link it to BJP which nobody believes
No money should be borrowed unless he has financial planning to settle the dues. Borrowers are playing with depositor money. Borrowers should realize this.
@@mg7685 I am not a bot & I am in the 30% IT bracket working in Private sector. You on the other hand look like a cheap MNREGA troll whose only job is to copy paste the lies uttered by your master Pappu Gandhi!
i have case bank in pound the document for 6 months later bank sanction loan less then amounts asked 2> bank asked given security to some one safasiac act is one side rule after demonotized and covide many Nap case come up browwer has right save is property is bank cant sell/acuction property now one point let bank given without security loan one word " merchent of venice"
All the loans were given by your favourite UPA and Italian gang and when they saw MODI was coming in 2014 they ran away from the country. First check before you vomit BS.
The law does not work like that. It is sad you do not understand the law. Both sides in a case have a right to an advocate, even if a court appointed advocate. The job of such an advocate is to defend his client to the best of his ability. It is the other advocate who must break down the arguments of the defending lawyer. And it is the judge's business and role to pass impartial judgment. An individual does not have the capacity to understand ALL the legal aspects by HOW a case must be proceeded with. Hence the need for an advocate to do this.
It is Kannada and Karnataka! Not (k)ann(?)da or (k)ar(a)nataka, High court and Supreme court language will be in English. ಮೂರ್ಖ! ಮೊದಲು ಕನ್ನಡ ಮತ್ತು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪದಗಳನ್ನು ವ್ಯಾಕರಣ ಅಥವಾ ಕಾಗುಣಿತ ತಪ್ಪುಗಳಿಲ್ಲದೆ ಸರಿಯಾಗಿ ಬರೆಯಲು ಕಲಿಯಿರಿ. ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮತ್ತು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಭಾಷೆ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಎಂದು ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜ್ಞಾನವನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ
@@sunwukong2959 Ninnant tukali, Kannada Nirabhimanigalu irodrinda namm nadu, bhashe, jala ella tondatre aagta ide, Ninage yake t*ka urita ide ? Yes English is preferable option in SC and HC However, some states have authorized the use of Hindi or other regional languages in their High Courts for official matters. For example, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Bihar have all authorized the use of Hindi in their High Courts. Tamil Nadu has also moved to authorize the use of Tamil in their High Court
@@sportslover8396 moorkkaa! stop copy paste from internet without scrutinising and understand it meticulously. If you don't understand go back to halli or hatti rear water buffalo. 1. Article 348(1) of the Constitution of India provides that *all-proceedings-in-the* *Supreme-Court-and-in-every-High-Court* *shall-be-in-English-language*. 2. Article 348 (2) provides that the Governor of the State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorize the use of the Hindi language or any other language used for any official purpose of the State, *in-the-proceedings-of* *the-High-Court having-its-principal-seat-in* *that-State-provided-that-decrees* *judgments-or-orders-passed-by-such-High Courts-shall-be-in-English*.
@@sportslover8396 3. The Official Language Act, 1963 reiterates this and provides under Section 7 that the use of Hindi or official language of a State in addition to the English language may be authorized, with the consent of the President of India, by the Governor of the State for the purpose of judgments, decrees etc. made by the High Court for that State. *No-law-has-been-made-in-this-regard-by-the-Parliament-so-far.-Therefore-English-continues-to-be-the-language-for- all-the=proceedings-of-the-High-Court-and-Supreme-Court*. 4. The 18th Law Commission of India in its 216th Report on “Non-Feasibility of Introduction of Hindi as Compulsory Language in the Supreme Court of India” (2008) has, *after-detailed-discussions-with-all-stake-holders-inter-alia-recommended-that-the-higher-judiciary-should-not-be-subjected-to-any-kind-of-even-persuasive-change-in-the-present-societal-context.-The-Government-has-accepted-the-stand-of-the-Commission*.
@@sportslover8396 5. The use of Hindi has been authorized long back in the proceedings as well in the judgments, decrees or orders in the High Courts of the States of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Government of India had received proposals from the Government of Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Karnataka to permit use of Tamil, Gujarati, Hindi, Bengali and Kannada in the proceedings of the Madras High Court, Gujarat High Court, Chhattisgarh High Court, Calcutta High Court and Karnataka High Court respectively. The advice of the Chief Justice of India was sought on these proposals as per a decision of Cabinet Committee taken in 1965 which provides that comments of the Chief Justice of India are necessary before considering any proposal for use of Hindi or any Regional language in the proceedings of a High Court. *The-Chief-Justice-of-India vide-his-d.o.-dated-16.10.2012-intimated-that-the-Full-Court-after-due-deliberations-decided-not-to-accept-the-proposals.-The-Government-has-abided-by-the-decision-of-the-Supreme-Court*.
And banks send recovery agents and even rowdies for people who take few thousands and under 5 -10 lakhs. For 10 years the borrower has not paid singe rupee.WOW and they want a mediation.
It's just a matter of small thieves and big thieves...
Don't pay anything to fucking banks
Indian law sucks
Co. Op. Bank Loans are mostly not repaid
Some times politically motivated announcement
will cancel repayment.
Proper repayer becomes sufferer
sub mili bhagat hai given without collateral
The law is sometimes cruel and these type of cases should be disposed without further delay.
It is high time the govt (aka sbi) steps in and gives at least 20,000 cr loan to each Lalit Modi and Nirav Modi and mallya to show how it is done. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yes mr mark, but for that to happen, congress should be in power right, loan was given in congress time
In the last 5 years the govt has written off loans worth 10 lakh crores. which is equal 10,00,000,00,00,000 ₹. The businesses the loans were written off. that data is not shared with the public. You should try and ask the govt whose money has been written off good luck with. I just made a fun analogy with 20,000 crores. it is just a joke
@MarkSamraj writting off includes bad assests of private banks and PSU banks as well and most of the loans were given in congress government in power, converted idiots like you link it to BJP which nobody believes
2 acer land in sadashiv nagar😂
No money should be borrowed unless he has financial planning to settle the dues. Borrowers are playing with depositor money. Borrowers should realize this.
Mallya 7000 crores ?
Nirav modi 12000 crores ?
Mwhul Choksi ?
All loans given in Congress regime under the nose of Raghuram Rajan!
Khangress bevarsigale loan kottiddu.
@@themarksman1 paid bot
All those loans were given by Crook Chidambaram under Congress rule..
@@mg7685 I am not a bot & I am in the 30% IT bracket working in Private sector. You on the other hand look like a cheap MNREGA troll whose only job is to copy paste the lies uttered by your master Pappu Gandhi!
i have case bank in pound the document for 6 months later bank sanction loan less then amounts asked 2> bank asked given security to some one safasiac act is one side rule after demonotized and covide many Nap case come up browwer has right save is property is bank cant sell/acuction property now one point let bank given without security loan one word " merchent of venice"
Income soirees no but incomc good next day
Since 2004 after manmohan singh assumed office money lending business became the core sector of Indian economy
2 acre land in sadashivnagar has taken over by the bank. That's it close the case
This is all done during Phone banking of Khangress
Loan taken is 9 crore not 23 crore
Aiyyo, kaundrava?
what is surfacy act
Sarfesi
Mortgaged property can be taken possession and sold
Anil ambani. 50000 Crores. Cleared by modi
Ok vadra bhakt
@@G.AmudhaGopichander are you not an idiot, who fails to understand that it is our money which is lost, whichever the businessman is affliated with?!
All the loans were given by your favourite UPA and Italian gang and when they saw MODI was coming in 2014 they ran away from the country. First check before you vomit BS.
@@G.AmudhaGopichanderawesome reply ❤❤
Vatican City hogi bar dancer helu tinnu
Im keen to know what happens after this
Circle no end
This is how banks are looted corporates under vasool Raja Modi
😂😂😂😂😂
Bahut choti chori kee 1000 crore tau hona chahiya thaa Malaya kee tarah
Kottoun koDangi... IskonDoun ____
Wawatartuuuggdee7sftstrgdamikkttllee
Advocate who take this an defend this type of cases should be jailed an ban there bar number
The law does not work like that. It is sad you do not understand the law. Both sides in a case have a right to an advocate, even if a court appointed advocate. The job of such an advocate is to defend his client to the best of his ability. It is the other advocate who must break down the arguments of the defending lawyer. And it is the judge's business and role to pass impartial judgment. An individual does not have the capacity to understand ALL the legal aspects by HOW a case must be proceeded with. Hence the need for an advocate to do this.
I want kannda discussion in court. In karanataka
Nai sulle magne
It is Kannada and Karnataka! Not (k)ann(?)da or (k)ar(a)nataka, High court and Supreme court language will be in English.
ಮೂರ್ಖ!
ಮೊದಲು ಕನ್ನಡ ಮತ್ತು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪದಗಳನ್ನು ವ್ಯಾಕರಣ ಅಥವಾ ಕಾಗುಣಿತ ತಪ್ಪುಗಳಿಲ್ಲದೆ ಸರಿಯಾಗಿ ಬರೆಯಲು ಕಲಿಯಿರಿ. ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮತ್ತು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಭಾಷೆ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಎಂದು ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜ್ಞಾನವನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ
😂 chuvanist spotted
Kannada maatadi saayro Thu
ಮೂರ್ಖ!
ಮತ್ತು ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮತ್ತು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಭಾಷೆ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ ಎಂದು ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜ್ಞಾನವನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯಿರಿ
@@sunwukong2959 Ninnant tukali, Kannada Nirabhimanigalu irodrinda namm nadu, bhashe, jala ella tondatre aagta ide, Ninage yake t*ka urita ide ? Yes English is preferable option in SC and HC
However, some states have authorized the use of Hindi or other regional languages in their High Courts for official matters. For example, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Bihar have all authorized the use of Hindi in their High Courts. Tamil Nadu has also moved to authorize the use of Tamil in their High Court
@@sportslover8396
moorkkaa! stop copy paste from internet without scrutinising and understand it meticulously. If you don't understand go back to halli or hatti rear water buffalo.
1. Article 348(1) of the Constitution of India provides that *all-proceedings-in-the* *Supreme-Court-and-in-every-High-Court* *shall-be-in-English-language*.
2. Article 348 (2) provides that the Governor of the State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorize the use of the Hindi language or any other language used for any official purpose of the State, *in-the-proceedings-of* *the-High-Court having-its-principal-seat-in* *that-State-provided-that-decrees* *judgments-or-orders-passed-by-such-High Courts-shall-be-in-English*.
@@sportslover8396
3. The Official Language Act, 1963 reiterates this and provides under Section 7 that the use of Hindi or official language of a State in addition to the English language may be authorized, with the consent of the President of India, by the Governor of the State for the purpose of judgments, decrees etc. made by the High Court for that State. *No-law-has-been-made-in-this-regard-by-the-Parliament-so-far.-Therefore-English-continues-to-be-the-language-for- all-the=proceedings-of-the-High-Court-and-Supreme-Court*.
4. The 18th Law Commission of India in its 216th Report on “Non-Feasibility of Introduction of Hindi as Compulsory Language in the Supreme Court of India” (2008) has, *after-detailed-discussions-with-all-stake-holders-inter-alia-recommended-that-the-higher-judiciary-should-not-be-subjected-to-any-kind-of-even-persuasive-change-in-the-present-societal-context.-The-Government-has-accepted-the-stand-of-the-Commission*.
@@sportslover8396
5. The use of Hindi has been authorized long back in the proceedings as well in the judgments, decrees or orders in the High Courts of the States of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Government of India had received proposals from the Government of Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Karnataka to permit use of Tamil, Gujarati, Hindi, Bengali and Kannada in the proceedings of the Madras High Court, Gujarat High Court, Chhattisgarh High Court, Calcutta High Court and Karnataka High Court respectively. The advice of the Chief Justice of India was sought on these proposals as per a decision of Cabinet Committee taken in 1965 which provides that comments of the Chief Justice of India are necessary before considering any proposal for use of Hindi or any Regional language in the proceedings of a High Court. *The-Chief-Justice-of-India vide-his-d.o.-dated-16.10.2012-intimated-that-the-Full-Court-after-due-deliberations-decided-not-to-accept-the-proposals.-The-Government-has-abided-by-the-decision-of-the-Supreme-Court*.
The law is sometimes cruel and these type of cases should be disposed without further delay.