2005 V6 Mustang - 4.0 liter 205 hp. 2015 V6 Mustang - 3.7 liters 300hp. A smaller V6 with nearly 100hp more yet no gas mileage penalty! The V6 has come a long way. 2005 V8 Mustang GT - 4.6 liter 300hp (same hp as the 2015 V6!)
rkgsd This $25K car gets to 60mph as fast as a 1998 540i sport 6 spd. Anyone who can't have fun with that is more interested in bragging rights and parking lot burnouts than actual road driving.
i made my V6 into a premium... OEM leather from ebay $379, the door sills light up from CJPonyParts, i also go heated pads from them as well so both seats heat up, my Pony in the front of the car is LED and is amazing, its a OEM part from Ford, google it, i have kickers in car, 12"pioneer w Alpine amp, Pioneer AVh 4200 NEX as the radio with the new Scosche heating kit, i would put mine against anyones. V6 Convertible, black on black with tinted windows. also had led lights installed on inside as well as the a Dash Cam that went around my rear view mirror. I will have to made a vid like this.. i have done all of these mods.. its beautiful...
If this is a review of the V6 why do you keep talking about the ecoboost? Sure introduce it in the beginning but stop talking about it, make a separate video for that if you want
hmm. I recognize that car. I literally just got home from sitting in that car. Didn't recognize it as a 2015 until I saw the headlight accents, I wasn't expecting it to be sitting out front. Its pretty. Made the FoST I was also considering feel like a joke. So much more bolstering in the 'stang. Feels awesome, the interior is very nice; no idea how people call it a fusion as it looks pure Mustang. Definitely a win for Ford.
I'm looking to purchase one of these in March.. still can't decide between the Ecoboost and the V6.. I like the idea of the Ecoboost making tons of power with mods but I question the reliability of that engine as it's already pushing it at 20 pounds.. and the V6, while not as powerful is old faithful.. you can throw everything on it plus safely run 6 pounds of boost and make over 400rwhp no problem.
...ever see what would happen if you put a small turbo on that 3.7 ? Nice things happen for less money than the 2.3 will cost you. I know someone that did that to a 2012 3.7 and it's faster than GT.. :O
Troy G The 2.3 cost about $300 more than the V6 optioned with the 18's and 3.55 gears... a Turbo Kit runs $6,000 easily.. nevermind the labor for installation and custom tuning.. So no, a turbo V6 most certainly will NOT cost less than a 2.3
Sigrafix..I beg to differ. The turbo (4) starts around 25k and the v6 starts at about 23k, so that's $2000 less not $200. And an after-market turbo for the 3.7 start at $3500 but can go up from there depending on the unit you buy. The idea of a (4) cyl Mustang just sounds silly! I used to own a 2010 Cobalt ss with a performance kit that bumped the HP and turbo pressure up a bit to just over 300 HP. Great car and had lots of fun with it. But it was a COBALT not a MUSTANG. With your premise , I guess we should lobby for Ferraris', Porsches, Corvettes, Camaro ss, etc .. to put turbo (4)'s in their ICONIC VEHICLES, because you'll get slightly better gas mileage, their lighter etc. Mustang is an iconic car period. The V8 belongs in it and the V6 I can live with. But as good as the four may be, it doesn't belong in the Mustang it belongs in the FOCUS which is where it already is.. (very good car by the way that would give the Mustang turbo a run for it's money , why? -Because it's lighter and handles better , why else ) -TG
this depends on how you drive. i get 20 MPG in the city. however mine is a 2016. the MPG is just really a guesstimate/average. i drive pretty conservatively so i get 20-25 MPG in the city, however i have seen people get 11.... out of a v6... 11 MPG..
Marty DeLeon far from Kyle's presentation, this guy does more of a amateuristic review complete with awkward narrative and brochure detail. Kyle is much more professional and descriptive
The v6 51A package comes with all the premium options accept for the leather seats and toggle switches. The interior lighting is also optional along with the different 18 inch wheel option designs and colors
The turbo four is advertised as having better fuel efficiency but turbo four bangers chug fuel when you're in boost not really that fuel efficient if you like some spirited driving
Does the ecoboost really have 50 torque over the V6? idc about gas id like the faster car lol im currently debating between the two... im getting stick and id like to get a magnaflow exhaust.. ecoboost sound worries me tho
Steering wheel is not leather wrapped? It doesnt look like it in the video, and it looks cheap as hell. I would pick the Challenger over this model in this class. How would you compare them, since I watched your review on the 2015 Challenger
The 2015 V6 Challenger is rated up to 31mpg. And come on now. The HellCat has 707hp on top. It's not the most powerful.. But it is a Looker. Between this and a Camaro. The Mustang wins. Between this and the Challenger.. In terms of what my taste of good looks is, It's a tie. Neither of them look any more sexier than the other one. They are both great looking machines.
The Hellcat is not the equivalent of the GT. You're talking about the GT500 and above. Shelby will probably up their game this time and put out 708HP or more..
THANK YOU. Idk why there's so much battle between them. I'm constantly watching videos of all of them. Personally I love the Camaro (especially a 1LE) but all of them are great cars
arge12 I don't think that's true. Even if you could upgrade, it certainly wouldn't be that cheap. That nav screen is only on Premium equipped models like Ecoboost and GT. They wouldn't put it on a v6 because they want it to die out slowly. They're taking away features from it on purpose
I liked the video I'm only 14 and getting my permit when I'm 15 license when I'm 16 and my favorite car is the mustang my grandpa had one and then sold it to my uncle it is a 2013 black Ford mustang with 2 gold stripes. And well anyways I want a mustang
>2.3 L Inline 4-Cylinder Turbo Part of me feels good knowing my 2.4L I4 Honda Accord (2007) has .1 more liters than a Mustang(I don't care if it's the lowest package).
I have a 14 premium v6 and I have to disagree with you on the interior, it is not mediocre at all!!!. The 15s have a better interior but that doesn't mean the 14s have mediocre interior. PS: the interior of my premium 14 is A LOT better the interior of the base v6 you are reviewing in this video
No. Since the Mustang was still released early enough in 64, even though it was the beginning of the second quarter(Mid April I do believe) when the Mustang was first released, it would still be 50 years. Next year will be 51 years. In Mid April, if I remember the history correctly. :)
Nojoke FYT In 1964 the cars' new models were all introduced in October unlike today. I distinctly remember ,having been around then, that it was intrduced as a 1964 1/2 model
I paid 27k out the door for my V6. Mine has some equipment package so it has the spoiler, fog lights, and 18 inch grey rims. I got white and I'm in love with
Too bad ford decided that this version would be their "rental fleet" car. Unlike previous V6's, no factory performance upgrades beyond a different rear end and they actually reduced the HP, all to make the new 4 banger look more attractive. Was actually going to buy one before they pulled that garbage.
Wow you review this car straight off a dam piece of paper 4 mins in you contradict yourself like 3x. Please when you do a review compare to the other recent and give your personal feedback as the person right in front of it and in it. Saabkyle does very informative and neutral reviews
I have never fallen in love with a car that much... As soon as I can afford you, I will buy you, beautiful Ford Mustang.
HeyImPamela I look forward to going to work everyday just to drive my car...what does that tell you.
its a real nice car. very solid and loveable.
HeyImPamela did you buy it
Same. I feel the exact same way.
There 15000 now
2005 V6 Mustang - 4.0 liter 205 hp.
2015 V6 Mustang - 3.7 liters 300hp. A smaller V6 with nearly 100hp more yet no gas mileage penalty! The V6 has come a long way.
2005 V8 Mustang GT - 4.6 liter 300hp (same hp as the 2015 V6!)
rkgsd This $25K car gets to 60mph as fast as a 1998 540i sport 6 spd. Anyone who can't have fun with that is more interested in bragging rights and parking lot burnouts than actual road driving.
+rkgsd I remember when the V-6 just surpassed 200hp, it was huge news back then!
And that was AFTER 9/11, shows how time flies by!!
+Bruno TaTa totally agree.......... I have the V6 and it's plenty powerful and loads of fun
I wish they made a premium V6 model
Ross Farrell I completely agree.
what do you get with the premium models?
You get leather seats and silver plastic on the front. It's more luxurious and nicer than the base model
the only thing I want from the premium pkg is the bigger screen and speakers, no need for leather
iliovecaRS Id be 100% ok with that.
You can't beat a naturally aspirated engine for less issues down the road. I had this engine in my F-150. I loved it!!!
I appreciate your effort for this exhaustive review, but no review is complete without a test drive!
Stop reading , just say it normally
i made my V6 into a premium... OEM leather from ebay $379, the door sills light up from CJPonyParts, i also go heated pads from them as well so both seats heat up, my Pony in the front of the car is LED and is amazing, its a OEM part from Ford, google it, i have kickers in car, 12"pioneer w Alpine amp, Pioneer AVh 4200 NEX as the radio with the new Scosche heating kit, i would put mine against anyones. V6 Convertible, black on black with tinted windows. also had led lights installed on inside as well as the a Dash Cam that went around my rear view mirror. I will have to made a vid like this.. i have done all of these mods.. its beautiful...
So When Are You Going To Make a Video of Your Mod Mustang?
Can you make a test drive video with this car and do a 0-60
Sounds like a 6th grade book report
Stfu
hahahaha omg
Anthony Jaswinski You could tell he was reading off of a script but he wasn't that bad.
Anthony Jaswinski That is the best comparison I have ever heard hahahaha!
If this is a review of the V6 why do you keep talking about the ecoboost? Sure introduce it in the beginning but stop talking about it, make a separate video for that if you want
V6 makes more power than the eco boost if ran with 93 octane. Dyno numbers don’t lie. Did I mention NA engines are easier to maintain?
So am I watching a review about the v6 or the ecoboost
Ludfag4life v6
It's actually the V5
hmm. I recognize that car. I literally just got home from sitting in that car.
Didn't recognize it as a 2015 until I saw the headlight accents, I wasn't expecting it to be sitting out front. Its pretty. Made the FoST I was also considering feel like a joke. So much more bolstering in the 'stang.
Feels awesome, the interior is very nice; no idea how people call it a fusion as it looks pure Mustang.
Definitely a win for Ford.
This will be my next Mustang!!!!!
I'm looking to purchase one of these in March.. still can't decide between the Ecoboost and the V6.. I like the idea of the Ecoboost making tons of power with mods but I question the reliability of that engine as it's already pushing it at 20 pounds.. and the V6, while not as powerful is old faithful.. you can throw everything on it plus safely run 6 pounds of boost and make over 400rwhp no problem.
...ever see what would happen if you put a small turbo on that 3.7 ? Nice things happen for less money than the 2.3 will cost you. I know someone that did that to a 2012 3.7 and it's faster than GT.. :O
Troy G The 2.3 cost about $300 more than the V6 optioned with the 18's and 3.55 gears... a Turbo Kit runs $6,000 easily.. nevermind the labor for installation and custom tuning.. So no, a turbo V6 most certainly will NOT cost less than a 2.3
Sigrafix..I beg to differ. The turbo (4) starts around 25k and the v6 starts at about 23k, so that's $2000 less not $200. And an after-market turbo for the 3.7 start at $3500 but can go up from there depending on the unit you buy. The idea of a (4) cyl Mustang just sounds silly! I used to own a 2010 Cobalt ss with a performance kit that bumped the HP and turbo pressure up a bit to just over 300 HP. Great car and had lots of fun with it. But it was a COBALT not a MUSTANG. With your premise , I guess we should lobby for Ferraris', Porsches, Corvettes, Camaro ss, etc .. to put turbo (4)'s in their ICONIC VEHICLES, because you'll get slightly better gas mileage, their lighter etc. Mustang is an iconic car period. The V8 belongs in it and the V6 I can live with. But as good as the four may be, it doesn't belong in the Mustang it belongs in the FOCUS which is where it already is.. (very good car by the way that would give the Mustang turbo a run for it's money , why? -Because it's lighter and handles better , why else ) -TG
They only thing I hate for the new Mustang is that the V6 is not offered with the premium package :/
GANZOP Personally I'd like the V6 with the Performance pack..
11.3 avg mpg? Gawd damn what’d u do to your mustang buddy
Drove it like a mustang
Lol they didn't reduce the HP on the V6, the engine remains the same they just advertised it with lower HP but dyno pulls have proven otherwise.
So how much is it making?
Driv3n to Dr1ve 305
I think the wheels are 18 inch not 17 inch , correct me if am wrong.
Haha @ Prius drive by. Was probably coming in to trade it in for the Mustang GT.
LOL good one!
The mustang v6 regular it’s a good car ?
17 city 28 hwy? isnt it still the same v6 from '13 '14? how did they lower mpg?
this depends on how you drive. i get 20 MPG in the city. however mine is a 2016. the MPG is just really a guesstimate/average. i drive pretty conservatively so i get 20-25 MPG in the city, however i have seen people get 11.... out of a v6... 11 MPG..
A mustang 2015 it’s a good car for buy ?
I have Just Fallen In love With The Mustang. Own A charger Dying for A Mustang Now To. Just Applied for New Mustang. I hope I get Approved 🙏
Everyone tries to do a saabkyle presentation.
Marty DeLeon He's just stealing from 2theRedline.
Marty DeLeon far from Kyle's presentation, this guy does more of a amateuristic review complete with awkward narrative and brochure detail. Kyle is much more professional and descriptive
Tobi Adams You can tell he was reading from a script, well trying to read from a script. Rather poorly though.
+Tobi Adams (Tobivator) tapping the door panel and saying soft touch material blends nicely with the stitching. Absolute SaabKyle ripoff LOL
he is the og of making car reviews
So this car comes with 10 different wheel options. But does that apply to the base v6 as well?
The v6 51A package comes with all the premium options accept for the leather seats and toggle switches. The interior lighting is also optional along with the different 18 inch wheel option designs and colors
The turbo four is advertised as having better fuel efficiency but turbo four bangers chug fuel when you're in boost not really that fuel efficient if you like some spirited driving
Could You Make A Review Of A 2015 Toyota Tundra 1794 Edition Thank You
Is the backup camera standard for all 2015 Mustang models?
Were all the torque numbers wrong or was every other review wrong
How was the stereo sound?
Should I get a 2010 or 2015
Keep up the good work Cameron! Love your vids
What is orque ? 270 orque?
I've got one its awesome.
1954? lol
he's reading because he doesn't know anything about mustangs....and reading like the HAL computer: "Dave what are you doing?"
I'm just kidding buddy, you did a good job. Thanks for the walkaround.
Does the ecoboost really have 50 torque over the V6? idc about gas id like the faster car lol im currently debating between the two... im getting stick and id like to get a magnaflow exhaust.. ecoboost sound worries me tho
***** Haha yeah i went with the underrated 6 cylinder and the flowmaster exhaust. i love it a lot
is your favorite word distinctive?
Go back to your mom's basement, little man....
Ramy Warda You're not even smart enough to be original you little butt nugget! lol
YOU NEED SOME SUGAR FOR UR SALTINESS SON
Ramy Warda You need a good spanking from daddy, little man lol
U wot m8 u wot fite me m8 swing first I ain't scairt sonny
Steering wheel is not leather wrapped? It doesnt look like it in the video, and it looks cheap as hell. I would pick the Challenger over this model in this class. How would you compare them, since I watched your review on the 2015 Challenger
i cant say anything about the 2015s. but my 2016 has a leather wrapped steering wheel
He said "leather wrapped", didn't you hear him?
Can we get the myford sistem( touch screen) for a V6 model ?
Wanderson Silva no ....you'd have to just go to best buy or something to get it or have ford install it but its no add on
Wanderson Silva fucking wish and a premium option to make us v6ers feel like we haven't been fucked in the ass
Ford is evil for making 2 more cylinders cost $5k each.
Whats thee music, its sounds cook
I Love That Mustang Too Cameron
It has 280 lb-ft, not 270. :)
The 2015 V6 Challenger is rated up to 31mpg. And come on now. The HellCat has 707hp on top. It's not the most powerful.. But it is a Looker. Between this and a Camaro. The Mustang wins. Between this and the Challenger.. In terms of what my taste of good looks is, It's a tie. Neither of them look any more sexier than the other one. They are both great looking machines.
The Hellcat is not the equivalent of the GT. You're talking about the GT500 and above. Shelby will probably up their game this time and put out 708HP or more..
Yea the GT500 That's what I meant. 708? I Doubt that Lol. Unless they copy Chrysler. We shall see
The HELLCAT with 707HP IS the most powerful American made PRODUCTION car ever.....
455Transam YOU DAMN RIGHT IT IS!!!
+Omarr Longway well technically yes. but the Shelby GT1000 shits on the hellcat in terms of HP.
Aren't the turn signals supposed to be sequential, like in the previous generation? In this video they are just ordinary.
He had the hazards on the normal turns are
Yes, thanks! :-)
Ravaniscool That'd be so cool if the hazards were sequential too
MCKOOKIE For sure! LOL!
MCKOOKIE they have that ....
What's the difference between 15 to 16 mustang?
2016 likely has some kinks that were in the 2015 model worked out.
It won't beat my Yugo!
Beautiful mustang
will the rear windows go down? I doubt it.
pbgrapejay1 no they don't only on the convertible
Yes they do
Do I sound crazy if I say, "I like all three Pony cars?" Being a Camaro owner...
THANK YOU. Idk why there's so much battle between them. I'm constantly watching videos of all of them. Personally I love the Camaro (especially a 1LE) but all of them are great cars
Good video but nobody can do it as good as saabkyle04
Right? Saabkyle04 rip off.
Those are 18's aren't they?
Chris Floresno they’re 22s
The challenger still looks so much better but mustang will always win when it comes to performance.
Did you not read my comment I just said the challenger looks better that's it ha
could you do the 2015 honda cr-v
I will be doing that very very soon stay tuned :)
Camerons Car Reviews,
could you do the 2015 Kia K900?
gross
Is the speaker system any good in the v6 model?
i think so. my speakers are very nice
Highly good it makes me horny
"Crisp and clear" :)
Soon...
Is there a option to get a bigger screen on dash?
That's on premium models apparently the v6 doesn't offer premium.
ranger86 I heard that we can upgrade it afterwards for $750, I'm waiting for mine to be deliver to see if is true or not.
arge12 so if i buy a v6 model i can put down 750 for the nav and bigger screen?
arge12 I don't think that's true. Even if you could upgrade, it certainly wouldn't be that cheap. That nav screen is only on Premium equipped models like Ecoboost and GT. They wouldn't put it on a v6 because they want it to die out slowly. They're taking away features from it on purpose
No you have to get the premium model
LED Fog lights*, not halogens
Zach Culp LEDS FLOGS LIGHT*
selectable drive mode available @V6?
justin fagomas yes
I liked the video I'm only 14 and getting my permit when I'm 15 license when I'm 16 and my favorite car is the mustang my grandpa had one and then sold it to my uncle it is a 2013 black Ford mustang with 2 gold stripes. And well anyways I want a mustang
u shud b bout 19 rn huh? or 20
Wow your reviews are just like saabkyle04
He literally read the car and driver review
Good review
This is the same exact car I want
6 speed makes it fun to drive
>2.3 L Inline 4-Cylinder Turbo
Part of me feels good knowing my 2.4L I4 Honda Accord (2007) has .1 more liters than a Mustang(I don't care if it's the lowest package).
That 4 cylinder is turboed as well
flip117100 4 cylinder just isn't a mustang. It doesn't sound right if you listen to the exhaust.
13:00 mins
When you say: "you have your mustang logo since 1954" its actually 1964 and not 1954 😀
Good review
is it me or does the 2013-14 V6 sound better then this
different tail pipes, same engine !!
Jordan Shiton hmm not really
Those look like 18" wheels
I have a 14 premium v6 and I have to disagree with you on the interior, it is not mediocre at all!!!. The 15s have a better interior but that doesn't mean the 14s have mediocre interior. PS: the interior of my premium 14 is A LOT better the interior of the base v6 you are reviewing in this video
screen looks bad in the base model
Backup Sensor**
It's an exact copy of the SaabKyle04 mustang review...
Dave Gayggins lmao riggt
since 1964 not 54!
If the Mustang was introduced in 1964 as a 19641/2 model shouldn't this be it's 51st anniversary?
No. Since the Mustang was still released early enough in 64, even though it was the beginning of the second quarter(Mid April I do believe) when the Mustang was first released, it would still be 50 years. Next year will be 51 years. In Mid April, if I remember the history correctly. :)
Zoey Rae James
If your reasoning was correct, it would have been introduced as a 1965 model.
Steve W 2015 vehicles come out in 14 ..
Nojoke FYT In 1964 the cars' new models were all introduced in October unlike today. I distinctly remember ,having been around then, that it was intrduced as a 1964 1/2 model
2016 exhaust sounds a lil better.
V6 doesn’t sound bad
you sound a lot like matt farah
He sounds nothing like Matt Farah.
I swear if he says distinctive one more time xD
anyone just buy one of these ? how much out the door$$
I paid 27k out the door for my V6. Mine has some equipment package so it has the spoiler, fog lights, and 18 inch grey rims. I got white and I'm in love with
+Riyad Girgis did you buy used or new? and was it 27k after tax and everything?
+Riyad Girgis you have the 051A package :)
i got my 2016 29K out the door taxes, title and all of that good junk
It's since 1964 not 54
Get your facts right.
Orleans Castellanos NEIN!
2:52
When he talks about the engine at least.
good review but it sounds like you are reading a script
Since 1954 lol. " 64
Smaller engine means more performance parts
Change my mind
jonathan rodriguez more pressure to the engine which means increase in engine being blown ... change my mind
Too bad ford decided that this version would be their "rental fleet" car. Unlike previous V6's, no factory performance upgrades beyond a different rear end and they actually reduced the HP, all to make the new 4 banger look more attractive. Was actually going to buy one before they pulled that garbage.
Since 1954?-_-
1954 1/2 technically
Scratch that lol 64 hahaha MA bad thought about it for a second
No since 1945
Nahhh can’t do the v6 engine has to be the v8 engine for me
He said 17" wheels, those are the optional 18"s....
Since 1955 haha
mustang 700 horsepower
Too bad that steering wheel isn't "fully leather wrapped". It's mainly that rubbery textured shit.
Shit. Why did I buy a 2014.
Shit. Why did I buy a 2004.
Shit, why did I buy a Honda?
(Just kidding)
Wow you review this car straight off a dam piece of paper 4 mins in you contradict yourself like 3x. Please when you do a review compare to the other recent and give your personal feedback as the person right in front of it and in it. Saabkyle does very informative and neutral reviews
Leather wrapped steering wheel... I think not!
Change your video title.
V6 Challenger has 305hp and the Camaro has 335 mustang has 300 definitely not one of the most powerful lol
+KingMaro RS The Mustang is also lighter than the Challenger. Also, Ford has the ecoboost as their none v8 competitor, pushing over 315 HP....
+KingMaro RS Mustang has been the fastest of the V6's since 2011. the 2016 Camaro Rs=S is same speed.
the challenger is also a beached whale. weighing nearly 500-1000 pounds more than the mustang. 5 extra HP isnt gunna push that any faster.