There is a hadith in Sahi Bukhari which can be the benchmark for all hadiths : Narrated by Aisha: “The Messenger of Allah said, ‘Why do some people impose some conditions which are not in Allah’s Book? Whoever imposes such a condition as is not in Allah’s laws, then that condition is not valid even he imposes one hundred conditions, for Allah’s conditions are more binding and reliable’.” (Sahi Bukhari, hadith # 2155)
You claim to be a learned person who wrote many books yet still have difficulty in reading comprehension. The Hadith talks about people's conditions which oppose Allah's laws. Allah's laws include those that were revealed by his Messenger pbuh. Stop commentating on TH-cam and go to a madrassa and get a real education.
That’s why Allah says, “Indeed those who disbelieve - it is all the same for them whether you warn them, or do not warn them - they will not believe. Allah has set a seal upon their hearts, and upon their hearing, and over their vision is a veil. And for them is a great punishment. (Quran 2:6-7)
@@ahmfarooq1823 Allahu Akbar. Using a verse describing kuffar on me. That's exactly what Khawarij were doing to justify their crimes against Muslims. You clearly don't understand the context of the Hadith. Erroneously interpreting it to reconcile your ideas that Hadith aren't a source of legislation. This raises more questions than answers. The Hadith are chock full of the Messenger pbuh giving guidance and commands not in the Qur'an. You want to cherry pick a Hadith, give it a wrong interpretation then say this is the only true Hadith. Very unserious effort by a lazy mind. I pray that Allah guides you from this deviant path.
@@ahmfarooq1823 You should have done that before misrepresenting the Hadith. Pick a side you either accept Hadith or you don't. Cherry picking isn't an objective process.
On the description of eyes, hands, etc. I never understood it as literal like ours but something to relate to instead. If a person thinks for a moment, they would come to the conclusion that, Allah(S.W.T.) is beyond our comprehension, his eyes are "not" like ours because he is all seeing, along with his hands, etc. But things are stated in order for us to understand something.
Of all of the episodes on Hadith, I think this video carries the most energy for me. Words fail me in describing the distain and annoyance I feel towards individuals who routinely invoke sunnah and Hadith to support their declarations. Who are these people who seek to impose themselves between my Lord and me? It is a historical fact that Christians invented saints and stories to embellish what they though is the truth. Are we Muslims to be no better than those Christians? If folks want to help this humble revert, share with me techniques that will aid my focus in prayer or endure my fasting with greater consistence. Keep all of these "thou shalt" or "thou shalt not.." for the folks with political and social agendas. 😢
That is a very "Protestant" (mis)description of Islam. From one convert to another: 1) i agree w you. Its annoying when scripture-thumping ppl try to coerce others into how they see the world. 2) our tradition is vast and complex and some of the greatest minds in history have pondered about our legacy. We dont get to just skip thru 1400 years of jurisprudence and theology just like that. There is no "sola scriptura" in Islam. 3) alhamdulillah, God thru Islam gave us commandments to uphold, so whether we like it or not there are some dos and donts. 4) i understand the allergy to "saints" in the christian sense. But our tradition, undeniably, has awliyaa', or pious individuals favoured by God w karamaat, or minor miracles. The diff being that we dont pray to them. Its taken me years to dig through the richness of our tradition and its complexity, so I encourage humility to keep learning w an open and *empty* mind. And to focus on the basics
I appreciate your comment so much. Reading the Quran for myself freed me from the vexing interruption of my connection with Allah. I am re-learning it in Arabic and it dawned on me that the interpretations of the Arabic language is also flawed. So much scientific parables lost in translations. I have studied the hadiths and I never found them to be credible. They are essentially written exactly like the New Testament. As a lawyer, it’s hard to accept any of them as credible considering they were “collected” centuries after they were allegedly uttered. Once I was freed by the Quran, my relationship with Allah strengthened and I realized that Allah guides intellectuals as the Quran calls you to think and ponder on His Words.
@@user-dq2lu4xv9j how many time do you pray a day though? Because coran said clearly 3 time only. If you do 5 you are clearly following the hadith not the Quran
I urge you to only focus on the Quran. Look at multiple translations to see if there’s any ambiguity. Allah will guide your heart to reject what’s not translated accurately, that’s how I realized that the language was misinterpreted too. 😅 But the Quran focuses on purification of the soul and provides stories of past prophets and messengers to show us examples we can pull from to purify our souls. The prayers should be done in your own language as Allah speaks all languages. Any person who tries to tell you how to do salat should be ignored. Worship Allah by prostrating and bowing to the best of your ability. He mainly wants your actions to be corrected and changed for the better. Salah in my humble opinion is an act of worship and that can happen in all ways. Be kind to yourself as you learn. The best thing that you can do is only rely on Allah to guide you and teach you. He knows how fast you learn, what concepts you understood and so He will keep pouring into your heart as you keep seeking at the pace he sets for you. It will become the joy of your life! I’m excited for you! By the way, a lot of “Muslim” people including misguided “scholars” will tell you you’re wrong. Do what Allah guides you to do and don’t follow anything you don’t understand.
Damn, he really thinks hes better than scholars like Avicenna and Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, etc in their understanding of the Quran. That hubris is really bad for learning our tradition.
Thank you, Dr. Shabir. Somehow I know that eventually you will discuss theology/aqida in the series. Of course this is not the place to discuss medieval theology, I appreciate how you limit the discussion only to hadith aspect of it.
Abu Hanifa and Malik and their students would reject many (ahad) hadith, if they seem to contradict the Quran, or qiyas, or istihsan, or maslaha, (or also amal of Medina in the Maliki case), which are all seen as higher sources of fiqh than the hadith. Only Al-Shafii and ibn Hanbal elevated the hadith above other sources of fiqh. It is strange that today Muslims have largely forgotten this, and most of them think and talk about the hadith as if they are Shafiis or Hanbalis (or Salafis) even if they technically belong to the Hanafi or Maliki madhab.
What about the Hadith about hoor al ain? Like is my husband really going to cheat on me in heaven? Do I have ANY hope of having a husband who has eyes for only me? Only men get a spouse who has eyes for only him in heaven? This makes my stomach hurt, it’s my worst fear. How can it be that we will have what our heart desires when my heart desires he only has eyes for me? But “you won’t have jealousy”, so then I am modified and not who I am because I am someone who wants him to desire only me. But he will have his heart satisfied by me not cheating on him? I really can’t wrap my head around this.
Jumping ahead of yourself. Get to haven first. You won’t have this body you have you won’t have this dunya mindset you have. If you get to Jannah. Best belief the creator the seven havens and the seven earths will satisfy your heart. In a way that you Can’t comprehend right. Have faith in Allah to please.
And who’s to say that you won’t have your version of what you want in Heaven . Meaning, you might be in heaven with your husband who only wants you but he is also in his heaven with you and others. You’re both getting what you want without knowing any difference. It’s possible, who knows for sure.
@mohamedadan5842 Amen, Brother. These fears are obviously Human fears and not Spiritual ones. This reminds me of the requirement that beads for Dhikr must be exactly "33" in count. When did we Humans become so concerned with such petty things and forget the whole purpose for Dhikr in the first place?
If Allah is all hearing and listening we accept that fact same way I accept Allah’s face and limbs, he himself mentioned I have no problem believing in it. One can argue all they want.
@@sajid279 Allah SWT allowed us to know his attributes. They include A face, eyes, Hands and feet. We don't know what they look like or how they are we just accept them because Allah revealed them in the texts.
Whats wrong with people. If i say to to a 100 years back person that i wrote in notebook , he couldn't understand its a laptop. Similar for Telegram, Apple watch etc. Don't visualize anything. Hand may not be hand, eye may not be eye what you think. Just understand and move on...
Human origin story may need rewriting after discovery of 8.7-million-year-old fossil The fossil finds add to the proposal that the ancestors of both humans and African apes evolved in Europe before migrating to Africa around nine-seven million years ago. Named Anadoluvius turkae, the ancient specimen was unearthed from within the Çorakyerler vertebrate fossil bed near Çankırı
The one thing that I think is missing about this series is what is the definition of something "problematic"? And who gets to define what is problematic? I dont necessarily find the hadith about God creating humans in His image as problematic just bc it happens to resemble material from the Christian/Jewish traditions. Besides, these statements in Christian and Jewish traditions was not thought to be a literal statement in the same way that we dont take statements about God's hands or eyes literally. Isnt it better to try the most charitable readings of hadiths before tossing it aside simply bc it doesnt make sense to people w modern sensibilities today?
It's missing because shabir is intentionally hiding his beliefs. He's a Maturidi. Meaning he puts philosophy above the scriptures. Allah's attributes don't jive with Aristotle/Philo's idea of God so the scriptures are to be reinterpreted to fit his narrative. Had shabir been an honest person he would have started by providing evidence for his philosophy Maturidi foundation and why's it's the best way to view Islam. He's smart enough to know that should he do that he risks losing subs. So he serves the sausage without showing how it's made.
you sound so ignorant disparaging and misrepresenting both, Maturidism (which btw is a core element in Sunni Islam) and Dr. Shabir. I have my ocassional disagreements with the shaykh, but I wouldn't go to the extent of making such aspersions about a well intentioned and beloved imam.
@@dandiaz19934 You're just personally criticizing me while never addressing my points. Personalities shouldn't be how you judge ideas. Imam Malik famously said "We can take and leave anyone's words except the man in this grave (then points to Prophet Muhammad's grave PBUH)"
@@mohamedsheikhmohamed5411 Mohammed, again until you demonstrate that have a basic understanding of what Maturidism actually is, you don't get to criticize either Maturidism (which is well established as a valid theological position in Sunni Islam for centuries) nor Dr. Shabir Ally
The Maturidi sect is among the theological schools falling under the umbrella of Ahlul Kalam, a group known for adopting philosophical approaches to Islamic theology. This category encompasses various theological schools, including the Mu'tazilis, Ash'aris, and some Shi'a branches, to name a few. These groups diverge from Ahlul Sunnah, also known as Ahlul Hadith, or Ahlul Athar, and colloquially referred to as Salafis in modern discourse. Ahlul Sunnah places their faith squarely upon Islamic scriptures, whether Qur'an or Sunnah. In contrast, Ahlul Kalam, to which Maturidism belongs, constructs its beliefs upon rational proofs and then endeavors to align the scriptures with these underlying assumptions. A notable exemplar of this approach is found in "Kitab al-Tawhid" by Al-Maturidi, a foundational work for Maturidism. Interestingly, this text predominantly relies on philosophical arguments, with scarce mentions of Quranic verses or Hadiths. The use of the Greek word "Hyle" within Al-Maturidi's book underscores the influence of Greek philosophy on his theological thought. Shabir's recurring assertion that reliance on Hadith is excessive aligns with the Maturidi perspective, which seeks to elevate human opinions above divine revelation. It's worth noting that characterizing Maturidism as a "core" component of Sunni Islam is misleading. Early Islamic scholars, who were the first to encounter the innovation of Ilm al-Kalam, unanimously viewed it negatively. Imam Shafi'i had famously the harshest critisims of kalam. Even Abu Hanifa, the founder of the Hanafi jurisprudential school, expressed opposition to Ilm al-Kalam. Honestly it would be worth researching their opinions on the Kalam. Ultimately, whether you agree or disagree on Maturidis being a deviant sect, maybe we can agree shabir's concealing that he's basically a Maturidi missionary isn't in the interest of full disclosure.
0:56 This is wrong. A person who says he believes but doesn't practice isn't a believer. Belief in Islam is made up of three components: Speech, actions and inner belief. What Shabir does is present the position of the deviant Murji'ah as the correct position i.e. belief is only in the heart. 1:22 He's wrong again. The highest level of proof for Muslims is the Qur'an and Sahih Hadith. Reason being that Hadith is inspired by Allah SWT. 2:19 a Hadith being Mutawatir or not is irrelevant. The Messenger pbuh would many times send a single teacher to Muslim communities outside Medinah. Clearly this single teacher's narration of Hadith is authentic despite not being backed by multiple Sahabas. 5:57 Mu'tazilah are a deviant sect their opinions on Hadith are worthless. "thinking outside the box" and "teasing the boundaries" is what leads to kufr. Follow the Qur'an and Hadith and don't innovate. 7:00 Shabir claims Allah's attributes in the Qur'an are vague, broad but doesn't show how. Claims Allah was forced to use metaphorical attributes in the Qur'an because the common people wouldn't understand him otherwise 🤦♂️. The truth is Allah is perfectly capable of communicating to us his attributes. If what shabir's saying is true Allah could have easily said that in the Qur'an. Starting from 7:26 shabir displays jis6misunderstanding of the usage of plural forms in Arabic. For a man who's debated Christians on the Bible it's shocking how poor his grasp of the Arabic language is. Arabic usage of plural and single are interchangeable. A key indication that Allah's speaking about his actual hands is him using the dual form yadayn. Which in Arabic can never be used to describe anything other than actual hands. Then he goes on having made up his mind that Allah's attributes are metaphorical, to start saying any Hadith that opposes my premise is weak. Clearly, this isn't an objective or rational way to judge Hadiths. The entire video can be summed up as "Allah's attributes are metaphorical therefore Hadiths affirming these attributes as real must be forgeries". The problem is he's never proved that the attributes are metaphorical. He just gave two arguments: 1) saying Allah was forced to give false/misleading attributes to himself so common people can understand him, and another 2) showing his poor understanding of Arabic language.
Well dr doing his best to help the tower from collapsing like the twin towers in New York., Muslim don’t see what he doing but they are calling him names when he is trying to maintain and reconstructe the tower.. It is an old building who have been standing for 1400 untouched, no renovation, whatsoever only when the ground shake a there and there, we sense the danger we have to do some réajustement, small renovation and new color in top of the old to covert the tracking.. Muslim called him innovator, Kafir destroying the old building structure when in fact he is trying his best. To help these same people from collapsing! Muslims are so ingrateful and blind side., You should encourage dr sabir from doing the best he can to hold the strings for them.. It is great risk for him, stressful, uncomfortable place he is standing right now.. One have he have the kufar’ and the other hand he have the ummah, in the middle he is standing.. Using his brain while the muslim are sending arrows to him,, and the kufar’s are sending arrows at him too! He is in the cross! Crossroad alone!! He is in the cross, crucified by his own people, crucified but his ennemies.. that is the symbol of the cross of.. you know who!
Why? Kafir? It is time hadiths needs to be looked into. U know how much non muslim are attacking in utube with haddith. Maybe, Dr will have enormous reward from Allah for his work.
سارے فساد قرآن کو چھوڑ کر انسانوں کی لکھی گئیں کتابوں کی وجہ سے ہیں۔ قرآن کے علاوہ لکھی گئیں تمام کتابیں شرک ہیں اور بیشک شرک ظلم عظیم ھے۔ اللہ نے قرآن کو کتاب مبین، کتاب محکم، کتاب میسر، کتاب مفصل اور ہر لحاظ سے مکمل کتاب کہا ھے۔ پاکستان میں آج تک اسلام نافذ نہ ہونے کی وجہ یہی شرکیہ کتابیں ہیں۔ حدیثیں 300 سال کے بعد لکھی گئیں۔ بخاری نے 6 لاکھ ہدیثوں میں سے صرف 4 ہزار حدیثوں کو چن لیا اور باقی 5 لاکھ 96 ہزار کو ردی کی ٹوکری میں ڈال دیا۔ قرآن حدیثوں کو جانتا ھے اور نا پہچانتا ھے۔ حضرت عمر رضی اللہ تعالٰی عنہ نے محمد صل اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم کو پنسل اور کاغذ دینے سے یہ کہہ کر انکار کردیا تھا کہ ہمارے لئے اللہ کی کتاب قرآن جو ہر لحاظ سے مکمل ھے کافی ھے۔ قرآن میں خدا انسانوں سے برائے راست متکلم ھے ، ہمیں اللہ اور اپنے درمیان کسی ملاں ، مفتی ، مفسر، ، اور عالم دین کی ضرورت نہیں ھے۔ ابوبکر صدیق رضی اللہ تعالٰی عنہ سے لیکر آج تک مسلمانوں کی تاریخ ، ان کے اعمال اور ان کی باتیں قرآن کا حصہ نہیں ہیں۔ اللہ کا پیغام صرف قرآن کریم میں ھے۔ ہمیں قرآن کریم کو خود پڑھنا اور اس پر غور کرنا چاہیے۔ یہ کیسے ہو سکتا ہے کہ غور تو ملاں کرے اور سمجھ ہمیں آئے۔ اسلام کی تعلیم حاصل کرنا ہر مسلمان پر فرض ہے اور اس کے لیے صرف ایک ہی کتاب ھے اور وہ ھے قرآن کریم جس کو اللہ تعالٰی نے ہر لحاظ سے مکمل کتاب کہا ھے۔ اللہ پاک ہم سب کو قرآن خود پڑھنے ، خود غور کرنے اور اس پر عمل کرنے کی توفیق عطا فرمائے آمین ثم آمین۔
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j oh OK I understand.. Yes he have power to heal of course.. I understand.. He is sitting at the right hand off God You know what right hand off the power mean...
Allah (SWT) is the creator of the universe. He provides our sustenance. He is beyond time and space without any shape and size. He is everywhere and knowledgeable about everything. He is beyond our comprehension. But, we the humans were always susceptible to imagine Him as an anthropomorphic entity. This led to idolatry. I think that the Quran probably throws a challenge to us by metaphorically describing God's attributes in human terms. This may also be a inadequacy of the language (even Arabic). We have fallen victim to this challenge from the beginning. Some of the dominant present day sects in Islam prefer to take these Quranic verses literally and have imposed a confusion on the Ummah by their wealth and power.
Why do non Muslims feel the need to show up and comment if they dislike Islam? You sure love spending your energy where you’re unhappy… miserable bunch 🤡
There is a hadith in Sahi Bukhari which can be the benchmark for all hadiths : Narrated by Aisha:
“The Messenger of Allah said, ‘Why do some people impose some conditions which are not in Allah’s Book? Whoever imposes such a condition as is not in Allah’s laws, then that condition is not valid even he imposes one hundred conditions, for Allah’s conditions are more binding and reliable’.” (Sahi Bukhari, hadith # 2155)
You claim to be a learned person who wrote many books yet still have difficulty in reading comprehension. The Hadith talks about people's conditions which oppose Allah's laws. Allah's laws include those that were revealed by his Messenger pbuh.
Stop commentating on TH-cam and go to a madrassa and get a real education.
That’s why Allah says, “Indeed those who disbelieve - it is all the same for them whether you warn them, or do not warn them - they will not believe. Allah has set a seal upon their hearts, and upon their hearing, and over their vision is a veil. And for them is a great punishment. (Quran 2:6-7)
@@ahmfarooq1823 Allahu Akbar. Using a verse describing kuffar on me. That's exactly what Khawarij were doing to justify their crimes against Muslims.
You clearly don't understand the context of the Hadith. Erroneously interpreting it to reconcile your ideas that Hadith aren't a source of legislation. This raises more questions than answers. The Hadith are chock full of the Messenger pbuh giving guidance and commands not in the Qur'an. You want to cherry pick a Hadith, give it a wrong interpretation then say this is the only true Hadith. Very unserious effort by a lazy mind.
I pray that Allah guides you from this deviant path.
There is a famous quote of Budhidharma:
“Not engaging in ignorance is wisdom.”
@@ahmfarooq1823 You should have done that before misrepresenting the Hadith. Pick a side you either accept Hadith or you don't. Cherry picking isn't an objective process.
On the description of eyes, hands, etc. I never understood it as literal like ours but something to relate to instead.
If a person thinks for a moment, they would come to the conclusion that, Allah(S.W.T.) is beyond our comprehension, his eyes are "not" like ours because he is all seeing, along with his hands, etc. But things are stated in order for us to understand something.
Of all of the episodes on Hadith, I think this video carries the most energy for me. Words fail me in describing the distain and annoyance I feel towards individuals who routinely invoke sunnah and Hadith to support their declarations. Who are these people who seek to impose themselves between my Lord and me? It is a historical fact that Christians invented saints and stories to embellish what they though is the truth. Are we Muslims to be no better than those Christians? If folks want to help this humble revert, share with me techniques that will aid my focus in prayer or endure my fasting with greater consistence. Keep all of these "thou shalt" or "thou shalt not.." for the folks with political and social agendas. 😢
That is a very "Protestant" (mis)description of Islam. From one convert to another: 1) i agree w you. Its annoying when scripture-thumping ppl try to coerce others into how they see the world. 2) our tradition is vast and complex and some of the greatest minds in history have pondered about our legacy. We dont get to just skip thru 1400 years of jurisprudence and theology just like that. There is no "sola scriptura" in Islam. 3) alhamdulillah, God thru Islam gave us commandments to uphold, so whether we like it or not there are some dos and donts. 4) i understand the allergy to "saints" in the christian sense. But our tradition, undeniably, has awliyaa', or pious individuals favoured by God w karamaat, or minor miracles. The diff being that we dont pray to them.
Its taken me years to dig through the richness of our tradition and its complexity, so I encourage humility to keep learning w an open and *empty* mind. And to focus on the basics
I appreciate your comment so much. Reading the Quran for myself freed me from the vexing interruption of my connection with Allah. I am re-learning it in Arabic and it dawned on me that the interpretations of the Arabic language is also flawed. So much scientific parables lost in translations. I have studied the hadiths and I never found them to be credible. They are essentially written exactly like the New Testament. As a lawyer, it’s hard to accept any of them as credible considering they were “collected” centuries after they were allegedly uttered.
Once I was freed by the Quran, my relationship with Allah strengthened and I realized that Allah guides intellectuals as the Quran calls you to think and ponder on His Words.
@@user-dq2lu4xv9j how many time do you pray a day though?
Because coran said clearly 3 time only.
If you do 5 you are clearly following the hadith not the Quran
I urge you to only focus on the Quran. Look at multiple translations to see if there’s any ambiguity. Allah will guide your heart to reject what’s not translated accurately, that’s how I realized that the language was misinterpreted too. 😅 But the Quran focuses on purification of the soul and provides stories of past prophets and messengers to show us examples we can pull from to purify our souls. The prayers should be done in your own language as Allah speaks all languages. Any person who tries to tell you how to do salat should be ignored. Worship Allah by prostrating and bowing to the best of your ability. He mainly wants your actions to be corrected and changed for the better. Salah in my humble opinion is an act of worship and that can happen in all ways. Be kind to yourself as you learn. The best thing that you can do is only rely on Allah to guide you and teach you. He knows how fast you learn, what concepts you understood and so He will keep pouring into your heart as you keep seeking at the pace he sets for you. It will become the joy of your life! I’m excited for you! By the way, a lot of “Muslim” people including misguided “scholars” will tell you you’re wrong. Do what Allah guides you to do and don’t follow anything you don’t understand.
Damn, he really thinks hes better than scholars like Avicenna and Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, etc in their understanding of the Quran. That hubris is really bad for learning our tradition.
Ma Sha Allah. Scholarly Series. This deep explanation is long overdue
What scholar have you seen that never gives references to anything?
@@mohamedsheikhmohamed5411
Is the Quran not an enough reference for you?
@@ogunkoyaoa2860 answer my question with a question. how high minded of you 🙄
He is constantly giving references!
Thank you, Dr. Shabir. Somehow I know that eventually you will discuss theology/aqida in the series.
Of course this is not the place to discuss medieval theology, I appreciate how you limit the discussion only to hadith aspect of it.
Im from Facebook Page,Excellent.🎉
Abu Hanifa and Malik and their students would reject many (ahad) hadith, if they seem to contradict the Quran, or qiyas, or istihsan, or maslaha, (or also amal of Medina in the Maliki case), which are all seen as higher sources of fiqh than the hadith. Only Al-Shafii and ibn Hanbal elevated the hadith above other sources of fiqh. It is strange that today Muslims have largely forgotten this, and most of them think and talk about the hadith as if they are Shafiis or Hanbalis (or Salafis) even if they technically belong to the Hanafi or Maliki madhab.
Yeah man you're right, after Imam al-Shafi (R.A) wrote his Risalah, fiqh had changed compared to the earlier two madhabs.
Alhamdulillah ❤
Great video
JazakAllah MashAllah
Dr Shabir, could you please explain the last verse of Surah Al-Tawkir and explain if it relates to divine pre-ordainment/Qadr.
Assalamu Alykum, is there a collection of Mutawatir hadith book available so i can read it? Jzk
What about the Hadith about hoor al ain? Like is my husband really going to cheat on me in heaven? Do I have ANY hope of having a husband who has eyes for only me? Only men get a spouse who has eyes for only him in heaven? This makes my stomach hurt, it’s my worst fear. How can it be that we will have what our heart desires when my heart desires he only has eyes for me? But “you won’t have jealousy”, so then I am modified and not who I am because I am someone who wants him to desire only me. But he will have his heart satisfied by me not cheating on him? I really can’t wrap my head around this.
Jumping ahead of yourself. Get to haven first. You won’t have this body you have you won’t have this dunya mindset you have. If you get to Jannah. Best belief the creator the seven havens and the seven earths will satisfy your heart. In a way that you
Can’t comprehend right. Have faith in Allah to please.
well put brother, trust God and His promise@@mohamedadan5842
And who’s to say that you won’t have your version of what you want in Heaven . Meaning, you might be in heaven with your husband who only wants you but he is also in his heaven with you and others. You’re both getting what you want without knowing any difference. It’s possible, who knows for sure.
Jesus Christ taught all about heaven
@mohamedadan5842 Amen, Brother. These fears are obviously Human fears and not Spiritual ones. This reminds me of the requirement that beads for Dhikr must be exactly "33" in count. When did we Humans become so concerned with such petty things and forget the whole purpose for Dhikr in the first place?
If Allah is all hearing and listening we accept that fact same way I accept Allah’s face and limbs, he himself mentioned I have no problem believing in it.
One can argue all they want.
Read Surah Ikhlas..
Camers too can see but they re not same as eyes...
What is the process of his seeing humans cant know ever...until he allows.
@@sajid279 Allah SWT allowed us to know his attributes. They include A face, eyes, Hands and feet. We don't know what they look like or how they are we just accept them because Allah revealed them in the texts.
Question to Dr Shabir: are these Hadith you mentioned authentic ones?.
-Allahaha prays to/for Momo:
Quran: 33:43, 33:56, 2:157
Whats wrong with people. If i say to to a 100 years back person that i wrote in notebook , he couldn't understand its a laptop. Similar for Telegram, Apple watch etc. Don't visualize anything. Hand may not be hand, eye may not be eye what you think. Just understand and move on...
Human origin story may need rewriting after discovery of 8.7-million-year-old fossil
The fossil finds add to the proposal that the ancestors of both humans and African apes evolved in Europe before migrating to Africa around nine-seven million years ago. Named Anadoluvius turkae, the ancient specimen was unearthed from within the Çorakyerler vertebrate fossil bed near Çankırı
How many hadith mutawatir do we have ?
The one thing that I think is missing about this series is what is the definition of something "problematic"? And who gets to define what is problematic?
I dont necessarily find the hadith about God creating humans in His image as problematic just bc it happens to resemble material from the Christian/Jewish traditions. Besides, these statements in Christian and Jewish traditions was not thought to be a literal statement in the same way that we dont take statements about God's hands or eyes literally. Isnt it better to try the most charitable readings of hadiths before tossing it aside simply bc it doesnt make sense to people w modern sensibilities today?
It's missing because shabir is intentionally hiding his beliefs. He's a Maturidi. Meaning he puts philosophy above the scriptures. Allah's attributes don't jive with Aristotle/Philo's idea of God so the scriptures are to be reinterpreted to fit his narrative.
Had shabir been an honest person he would have started by providing evidence for his philosophy Maturidi foundation and why's it's the best way to view Islam. He's smart enough to know that should he do that he risks losing subs. So he serves the sausage without showing how it's made.
you sound so ignorant disparaging and misrepresenting both, Maturidism (which btw is a core element in Sunni Islam) and Dr. Shabir. I have my ocassional disagreements with the shaykh, but I wouldn't go to the extent of making such aspersions about a well intentioned and beloved imam.
@@dandiaz19934 You're just personally criticizing me while never addressing my points. Personalities shouldn't be how you judge ideas. Imam Malik famously said "We can take and leave anyone's words except the man in this grave (then points to Prophet Muhammad's grave PBUH)"
@@mohamedsheikhmohamed5411 Mohammed, again until you demonstrate that have a basic understanding of what Maturidism actually is, you don't get to criticize either Maturidism (which is well established as a valid theological position in Sunni Islam for centuries) nor Dr. Shabir Ally
The Maturidi sect is among the theological schools falling under the umbrella of Ahlul Kalam, a group known for adopting philosophical approaches to Islamic theology. This category encompasses various theological schools, including the Mu'tazilis, Ash'aris, and some Shi'a branches, to name a few. These groups diverge from Ahlul Sunnah, also known as Ahlul Hadith, or Ahlul Athar, and colloquially referred to as Salafis in modern discourse. Ahlul Sunnah places their faith squarely upon Islamic scriptures, whether Qur'an or Sunnah.
In contrast, Ahlul Kalam, to which Maturidism belongs, constructs its beliefs upon rational proofs and then endeavors to align the scriptures with these underlying assumptions. A notable exemplar of this approach is found in "Kitab al-Tawhid" by Al-Maturidi, a foundational work for Maturidism. Interestingly, this text predominantly relies on philosophical arguments, with scarce mentions of Quranic verses or Hadiths. The use of the Greek word "Hyle" within Al-Maturidi's book underscores the influence of Greek philosophy on his theological thought.
Shabir's recurring assertion that reliance on Hadith is excessive aligns with the Maturidi perspective, which seeks to elevate human opinions above divine revelation.
It's worth noting that characterizing Maturidism as a "core" component of Sunni Islam is misleading. Early Islamic scholars, who were the first to encounter the innovation of Ilm al-Kalam, unanimously viewed it negatively. Imam Shafi'i had famously the harshest critisims of kalam. Even Abu Hanifa, the founder of the Hanafi jurisprudential school, expressed opposition to Ilm al-Kalam. Honestly it would be worth researching their opinions on the Kalam.
Ultimately, whether you agree or disagree on Maturidis being a deviant sect, maybe we can agree shabir's concealing that he's basically a Maturidi missionary isn't in the interest of full disclosure.
1:15 bookmark
Fear Allah for your bidah
Please not too speak fast because i am not english speaking people particularly for syafiyah.
0:56 This is wrong. A person who says he believes but doesn't practice isn't a believer. Belief in Islam is made up of three components: Speech, actions and inner belief. What Shabir does is present the position of the deviant Murji'ah as the correct position i.e. belief is only in the heart.
1:22 He's wrong again. The highest level of proof for Muslims is the Qur'an and Sahih Hadith. Reason being that Hadith is inspired by Allah SWT.
2:19 a Hadith being Mutawatir or not is irrelevant. The Messenger pbuh would many times send a single teacher to Muslim communities outside Medinah. Clearly this single teacher's narration of Hadith is authentic despite not being backed by multiple Sahabas.
5:57 Mu'tazilah are a deviant sect their opinions on Hadith are worthless. "thinking outside the box" and "teasing the boundaries" is what leads to kufr. Follow the Qur'an and Hadith and don't innovate.
7:00 Shabir claims Allah's attributes in the Qur'an are vague, broad but doesn't show how. Claims Allah was forced to use metaphorical attributes in the Qur'an because the common people wouldn't understand him otherwise 🤦♂️. The truth is Allah is perfectly capable of communicating to us his attributes. If what shabir's saying is true Allah could have easily said that in the Qur'an.
Starting from 7:26 shabir displays jis6misunderstanding of the usage of plural forms in Arabic. For a man who's debated Christians on the Bible it's shocking how poor his grasp of the Arabic language is. Arabic usage of plural and single are interchangeable. A key indication that Allah's speaking about his actual hands is him using the dual form yadayn. Which in Arabic can never be used to describe anything other than actual hands.
Then he goes on having made up his mind that Allah's attributes are metaphorical, to start saying any Hadith that opposes my premise is weak. Clearly, this isn't an objective or rational way to judge Hadiths. The entire video can be summed up as "Allah's attributes are metaphorical therefore Hadiths affirming these attributes as real must be forgeries". The problem is he's never proved that the attributes are metaphorical. He just gave two arguments: 1) saying Allah was forced to give false/misleading attributes to himself so common people can understand him, and another 2) showing his poor understanding of Arabic language.
Thank you Dr shabir..
We hope you open it up for us..
Soon. You will be called kaffir, in.fact
For 1400 years .. now
Well dr doing his best to help the tower from collapsing like the twin towers in New York.,
Muslim don’t see what he doing but they are calling him names when he is trying to maintain and reconstructe the tower..
It is an old building who have been standing for 1400 untouched, no renovation, whatsoever only when the ground shake a there and there, we sense the danger we have to do some réajustement, small renovation and new color in top of the old to covert the tracking..
Muslim called him innovator, Kafir destroying the old building structure when in fact he is trying his best. To help these same people from collapsing!
Muslims are so ingrateful and blind side.,
You should encourage dr sabir from doing the best he can to hold the strings for them..
It is great risk for him, stressful, uncomfortable place he is standing right now..
One have he have the kufar’ and the other hand he have the ummah, in the middle he is standing..
Using his brain while the muslim are sending arrows to him,, and the kufar’s are sending arrows at him too!
He is in the cross!
Crossroad alone!!
He is in the cross, crucified by his own people, crucified but his ennemies.. that is the symbol of the cross of.. you know who!
Why? Kafir?
It is time hadiths needs to be looked into. U know how much non muslim are attacking in utube with haddith. Maybe, Dr will have enormous reward from Allah for his work.
thankyou doctor shabir,your videos made me dig into the religion and after studying the religion ,i became an exmuslim.
What is wrong with you?
Are you an atheist now?
سارے فساد قرآن کو چھوڑ کر انسانوں کی لکھی گئیں کتابوں کی وجہ سے ہیں۔ قرآن کے علاوہ لکھی گئیں تمام کتابیں شرک ہیں اور بیشک شرک ظلم عظیم ھے۔
اللہ نے قرآن کو کتاب مبین، کتاب محکم، کتاب میسر، کتاب مفصل اور ہر لحاظ سے مکمل کتاب کہا ھے۔
پاکستان میں آج تک اسلام نافذ نہ ہونے کی وجہ یہی شرکیہ کتابیں ہیں۔
حدیثیں 300 سال کے بعد لکھی گئیں۔ بخاری نے 6 لاکھ ہدیثوں میں سے صرف 4 ہزار حدیثوں کو چن لیا اور باقی 5 لاکھ 96 ہزار کو ردی کی ٹوکری میں ڈال دیا۔
قرآن حدیثوں کو جانتا ھے اور نا پہچانتا ھے۔
حضرت عمر رضی اللہ تعالٰی عنہ نے محمد صل اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم کو پنسل اور کاغذ دینے سے یہ کہہ کر انکار کردیا تھا کہ ہمارے لئے اللہ کی کتاب قرآن جو ہر لحاظ سے مکمل ھے کافی ھے۔
قرآن میں خدا انسانوں سے برائے راست متکلم ھے ، ہمیں اللہ اور اپنے درمیان کسی ملاں ، مفتی ، مفسر، ، اور عالم دین کی ضرورت نہیں ھے۔
ابوبکر صدیق رضی اللہ تعالٰی عنہ سے لیکر آج تک مسلمانوں کی تاریخ ، ان کے اعمال اور ان کی باتیں قرآن کا حصہ نہیں ہیں۔
اللہ کا پیغام صرف قرآن کریم میں ھے۔ ہمیں قرآن کریم کو خود پڑھنا اور اس پر غور کرنا چاہیے۔
یہ کیسے ہو سکتا ہے کہ غور تو ملاں کرے اور سمجھ ہمیں آئے۔
اسلام کی تعلیم حاصل کرنا ہر مسلمان پر فرض ہے اور اس کے لیے صرف ایک ہی کتاب ھے اور وہ ھے قرآن کریم جس کو اللہ تعالٰی نے ہر لحاظ سے مکمل کتاب کہا ھے۔
اللہ پاک ہم سب کو قرآن خود پڑھنے ، خود غور کرنے اور اس پر عمل کرنے کی توفیق عطا فرمائے آمین ثم آمین۔
quran bi fasad he .quran ki ayat 9:29 and 4:34 ne mujhe islam chorne pe majboor kr diya
@@namra7957MashAllah
If Prophet Jesus Christ second time coming is he Alive dead people 🤔
He us alive.. in heaven.
The Bible say so too,ong before Quran came in..
@@whoisthispleasefathmah8963 I mean to say if prophet Isa second time coming he have a power to heal some one & Alive death people 🤔
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j oh OK I understand..
Yes he have power to heal of course..
I understand..
He is sitting at the right hand off God
You know what right hand off the power mean...
@@whoisthispleasefathmah8963 who is Anti chirst 🤔
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j the anti christ is the onebwho deny the father and son .....
1 John 2:22)
Allah (SWT) is the creator of the universe. He provides our sustenance. He is beyond time and space without any shape and size. He is everywhere and knowledgeable about everything. He is beyond our comprehension. But, we the humans were always susceptible to imagine Him as an anthropomorphic entity. This led to idolatry. I think that the Quran probably throws a challenge to us by metaphorically describing God's attributes in human terms. This may also be a inadequacy of the language (even Arabic). We have fallen victim to this challenge from the beginning. Some of the dominant present day sects in Islam prefer to take these Quranic verses literally and have imposed a confusion on the Ummah by their wealth and power.
Finally, a Muslim got the guts to expose his religion
He's not a Muslim.
And he's been doing it for the longest time... The thing is, the more you're to expose the weakest point. That's new in Islam...
@@Black.Seed. Who isn't Muslim?
What do you mean? To dissect the religion? "Expose" is making it like something bad.
Why do non Muslims feel the need to show up and comment if they dislike Islam? You sure love spending your energy where you’re unhappy… miserable bunch 🤡