Omega Planet Ocean ULTRA DEEP

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 159

  • @itsgarydevlin
    @itsgarydevlin ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I love that you're the only watch nerd getting these frankly ridiculous watches in and giving them such high quality production and presentation. It's easy to tell that you do this stuff for YOU mainly, as well as intriguing audiences with pieces that aren't "normally covered". I certainly appreciate that your not making videos for clicks. Thanks dude - what a badass watch that ultra deep is!

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I'm glad my weird passion is coming through. Also, sorry.

  • @MJ-we5if
    @MJ-we5if ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Look how amazing a planet ocean looks without a manual helium escape valve!

    • @JamesIdentity
      @JamesIdentity ปีที่แล้ว +3

      so true!!

    • @torontowatches9709
      @torontowatches9709 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah because it looks like a Sea Dweller homage lol that's a beautiful watch!

    • @yleexot
      @yleexot ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't hate. Embrace 😊

    • @DeadReckoner
      @DeadReckoner ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And no date! Imagine if they made a PO 300m with the 8912 and no He valve... Yummy!

    • @fredericniang4532
      @fredericniang4532 ปีที่แล้ว

      the helium escape valve is here to stay. it's iconic. Omega's cyclop from Rolex. who else has that?

  • @chrono1g
    @chrono1g ปีที่แล้ว +195

    FINALLY….a watch I can wear in the shower.

    • @beerkegaard
      @beerkegaard ปีที่แล้ว +38

      better take it off just to be safe

    • @lucioledizerot196
      @lucioledizerot196 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      CAREFUL THE SOAP WILL DISSOLVE THE WATCH AND CREATE A BLACK HOLE

    • @TheVeeginator
      @TheVeeginator ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Is this a joke?? You can't wear watches in the water everyone knows that. Also make sure to service it every 6 months.

    • @dingodave3966
      @dingodave3966 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, no….

    • @ryangochuico
      @ryangochuico ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Still cant swim with it. Maybe someday a brand will come up with a watch you can submerge in the pool

  • @Wildcatjames1
    @Wildcatjames1 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I tried the orange version on recently and I was shocked at how much smaller it looked on wrist to what I was expecting. The steel looks fabulous and the fine chamfered edges on the bracelet are extremely well done.

  • @theannouncer5538
    @theannouncer5538 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Finally a watch I’d feel safe walking through the rain in

  • @brunohinst3123
    @brunohinst3123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been wearing this watch for the last 3 years. During that time I have Captained a yacht across the North Pacific and dived regularly to 65m on trimix. Omega never fails to back up my dive computer and will always alow me to have a time profile to count down on my ascent...Cheers

  • @DrRC84
    @DrRC84 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos. Very entertaining and your humor is right up my alley. Oh and this watch is awesome

  • @theshadowman1398
    @theshadowman1398 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Ploprof is such a beautiful watch. Will hopefully add it to my collection in the next couple of years

  • @sumitkar8146
    @sumitkar8146 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this channel especially the subtle humor

    • @fredrik1552
      @fredrik1552 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, me too! It’s the best thing, the part when Ewan uses Helium to change the pitch of his voice hahahaha. Who does that???? Ewan, that is who.

  • @barryvercueil2346
    @barryvercueil2346 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Honestly an incredible watch. I'd buy it if I could afford it. Cheers.

  • @SpaceG95
    @SpaceG95 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a quaint little watch. ❤

  • @espaanderman
    @espaanderman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video!
    Ps.
    DSV stands for diving support vessel.
    The divers stay on board in their saturation chamber their entire trip where they stay under pressure and go up and down to their worksite in what's called a bell.
    Fun fact, DSVs also have hyperbaric lifeboats, so the divers can stay pressurized if they have to abandon ship for whatever emergency.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @attilab9593
    @attilab9593 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations on daring to show us the scratches on the clasp of your Ploprof. I admire your videos, too!

  • @rsavage173
    @rsavage173 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved the decompression explanation 👌

  • @scott-y8f
    @scott-y8f ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the you’re terrific t-shirts, great quality and fit. Lots of funny questions from people who see them. 😎

  • @plexiform1973
    @plexiform1973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing excessive about this at all. Love it. I'd daily wear that. Just slightly larger than my Planet Ocean 600M GMT. People call my watch large but it feels perfect on the wrist.

  • @ericdhadden
    @ericdhadden ปีที่แล้ว

    You were supposed to tell me this was totally impractical, a fool's errand, and yet here we are...hovering over the "add to cart" button. So much for being the voice of reasonability.

  • @nicolasv99
    @nicolasv99 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One feels it when you really like a watch, and not just having fun with it! (I like it too in the same way I like the Seiko MM300.)

  • @tristantakevideo
    @tristantakevideo ปีที่แล้ว

    This video makes me want to buy this watch to never wear, but always look at. Lovely.

  • @bretkindsvatter3574
    @bretkindsvatter3574 ปีที่แล้ว

    Havent tried this on, but you rock it. I was shocked at how much I liked the wearing experience of the planet ocean 39.5 over the seamaster 300. Omega definitely has more than the SM300

  • @marcuslieberman3577
    @marcuslieberman3577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. It is a good looking watch. I'm packing up my magnets and getting away from it all! 😀

  • @JeffreyMcMahon
    @JeffreyMcMahon ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Omega has made a watch I can never use for its intended purpose while at the same time making me "need" to have one.

  • @wheelsandwatches
    @wheelsandwatches ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos. Another great one.

  • @thebullshittersvonmatterho8512
    @thebullshittersvonmatterho8512 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this doesn’t need a helium escape valve but the 300m does?

  • @matthewehrlich5195
    @matthewehrlich5195 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video. I have the same hate-like for several similarly weird unnecessary pieces. (Aren’t they all). Really surprised the UV light Easter egg didn’t make the video though. I’m sure there’s many many jokes in that.

  • @Harris.Justus
    @Harris.Justus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tell us how you really feel about the helium escape valve.

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I feel like a dermatologist should remove it with a laser.

  • @UnseenHero
    @UnseenHero ปีที่แล้ว

    At first I was expecting you to say o-mega steel with a sound effect only to be proven wrong and then immediately after proven right. Happy you did

  • @atanasdimitrow2578
    @atanasdimitrow2578 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have already ordered this exact model!❤

  • @hobokenarts
    @hobokenarts ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, photography…cinematography? And what a beautiful watch. Omega is finally on the right track with aesthetics….now, if they could just make a BB54-like version. Yeah, I could part with a kidney for that.

    • @TheVeeginator
      @TheVeeginator ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Honestly as much as I love the wave dial on the SMP300 it makes the dial way too busy. Make it 40mm diameter, 13mm thick, 48mm lug to lug, remove the sea wave, give options for date/no date, and offer a number of colours and BOOM

    • @hobokenarts
      @hobokenarts ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All I am going to say @@TheVeeginator is 165.024.

    • @stevestifler4693
      @stevestifler4693 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheVeeginatorso, a Submariner?

    • @TheVeeginator
      @TheVeeginator ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevestifler4693 no, a watch that has good enough proportions to be worn by ANYONE, not just people with 7" wrists
      There are so many other design aspects of the SMP300 which will keep it differentiated from the Sub, your comment is reductionist

  • @captainkirk1983
    @captainkirk1983 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude I love your videos, can you let me know/drop a link in the description for the awesome synthwave tracks you're using for your intro/outro? Cheers!

  • @EdwardViaTomato
    @EdwardViaTomato ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks really good. I think it needs a large wrist, not for the width or lug-to-lug, but for the depth.

  • @DavidDuVivier
    @DavidDuVivier ปีที่แล้ว

    I've tried this watch on a couple times lately and the temptation is growing despite its price. Solid, simple (no useless "complications", and no date to fiddle with, thank God!), tough & durable. That the titanium model can only be worn with NATO straps (I hate them), plus the fact that it has no crown guards, knocks titanium out of the race in my case. But the steel version is not too heavy if you're used to wearing large, heavy strainless steel diver's watches. Only real downside: For wearers of long-sleeve dress shirts it's impracticably thick. Otherwise, this watch is beautiful but straightforward, always readable and simply very practical. Mainly because it's so rock solid... not because anyone expects to go down 6000 meters and come back alive.

  • @mackledee
    @mackledee ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. I have a cal 8500 with the jump hour. I really like setting time. Date can be annoying though. Especially if I don't wear it for a while. With a long power reserve though it doesn't happen much.

  • @j8sdx
    @j8sdx ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I agree its very wearable, my wrist is about 6 and 3/4 and it wears well on it. I have it on the rubber strap as the bracelet model was sold out and considering I paid 40% less than rrp I'm not complaining

    • @AcmeRocket
      @AcmeRocket ปีที่แล้ว

      Will it fit under a cuff?

    • @j8sdx
      @j8sdx ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AcmeRocket depends how tight the cuff is I have had no issues

    • @jacobt1027
      @jacobt1027 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@AcmeRocket probably not. but it ain't a dress watch

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, a wizard’s robe cuff.

    • @AcmeRocket
      @AcmeRocket ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelriera6277 😂

  • @BennyLlama
    @BennyLlama ปีที่แล้ว

    Im thinking of getting the summer blue varient and my main concern is the weight. Its a hefty watch ro say the least

  • @Ryan-pu9yw
    @Ryan-pu9yw ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude is making the best videos in the watch game

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I don’t know about that.

  • @WatchGeek
    @WatchGeek ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I also find it so ridiculous that I actually like it!
    Sadly, or luckily, depends how you look at it, my wrist can fit 36,923 times into that depth rating so I can't pull it off 😢

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Now I gotta bust out my calculator.

    • @harrison1056
      @harrison1056 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same size here... try one on, you might be surprised at how not-ridiculous it looks.

  • @cl302
    @cl302 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you tried the James Cameron? Would love to know your take between these two as I own a JC and between the two they seem fairly similar.

  • @wisamal-hakim5531
    @wisamal-hakim5531 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I prefer the ploprof I think that’s an awesome watch. I used to own a seadweller which is also very nice

    • @bloodymarvelous4790
      @bloodymarvelous4790 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I can't think of a better and more capable dive watch than the 116600 Sea-Dweller.
      A modern extreme dive watch that doesn't look like an extreme dive watch.

  • @Brajin1
    @Brajin1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a first gen planet ocean 45.5 mm. I swear it looked half as thick as this one lol. Good looking watch though!!

  • @pollandball5424
    @pollandball5424 ปีที่แล้ว

    I laughed before you speak in your helium voice, the anticipation makes me laugh 😂

  • @Alejosales
    @Alejosales ปีที่แล้ว

    Stunning! ❤❤❤

  • @DanialaAgha
    @DanialaAgha ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it come in 36mm?

  • @axelolsson7591
    @axelolsson7591 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It truly is pretty. When making their new record-breaking diver, I feel like Rolex completely forgot to make something actually good looking or even remotely wearable in the persuit of being top dog. This watch is so much more appealing.

    • @j8sdx
      @j8sdx ปีที่แล้ว

      Omega made a watch that u can wear and Rolex made a clock

  • @r.douglas5695
    @r.douglas5695 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the Deep Sea Killer ! I wish they had a titanium bracelet model😏

  • @underachievingwatchcollect1878
    @underachievingwatchcollect1878 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Extra everything is good 👍!

  • @LosNTime
    @LosNTime ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review man
    The humor was on point
    Be different wear a big ass watch!

  • @verykeen2please
    @verykeen2please ปีที่แล้ว

    what a beautiful beast

  • @watchnerds
    @watchnerds ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my... I wish they made this complete with its bracelet out of platinum+tantalum. A statement piece, armor for the wrist and a fatal blunt weapon.

  • @californiacastle
    @californiacastle ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Avenger 2 Seawolf which has the same measurements and it is a beefy watch. On my 7.5 wrist it fits much better on a strap than bracelet b/c the bracelet makes the thing way too top heavy. I imagine this must be the same. But this is such a good looking piece tho!

  • @chubs41
    @chubs41 ปีที่แล้ว

    This seems better designed that the 300M. I own a blue dial Seamaster 300M and a 41mm black dial Tag Heuer Aquaracer and I find myself reaching for my Tag more often.
    While my 300M has a gorgeous blue ceramic dial, that's where the fun ends. Granted it has the micro adjust that I find very useful throughout the day but two big problems I find are the weight and the massive clasp. The 42mm size just barely fits my 6.5 inch wrist and I'm always aware of the weight of the watch on my wrist. The large clasp means a large area for scratches and fewer links to go around my wrist robbing me of the pleasure of admiring the bracelet. I find the non-tapering bracelet ok but I don't care for the helium escape valve and the tiny date window.
    For all the crap that Tag receives, their Aquaracer is sensibly proportioned, has a decent sized clasp, a magnified date window, lovely matt finished steel bracelet and feels substantial but not so heavy that I'm always aware of it when I wear the watch.

  • @Porsche9284ever
    @Porsche9284ever ปีที่แล้ว

    What a massive tough watch! I would be totally afraid of scratching it…

  • @justthepip
    @justthepip ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now do a whole video with the helium voice next. Please and thanks.

  • @jimmuisenga5025
    @jimmuisenga5025 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I owned this watch. It was just too much. Now I wish they made this exact watch but 12 MM thick, and 150 M water resistant. Please Omega, please.

    • @rodsalvador3608
      @rodsalvador3608 ปีที่แล้ว

      this is sacrilegious, but i wish the regular seamaster looked like this

  • @robbbbery
    @robbbbery ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This watch mostly makes me wish that they made a planet ocean without a date. And that I could afford one.

  • @KTZ_86
    @KTZ_86 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, Seiko was the first to make a saturation diver without the need of a HE valve. And basically all Seiko/GS divers with a rating above 300m have this feature. It's called an "L" shaped gasket.

  • @LuisOrtizMBA
    @LuisOrtizMBA ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You absolutely do not need to set the hours and minutes separately. 🤣
    The jump hour function is just there if you want to travel.

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's true, but setting the hours and minutes together is very slow on these movements. Takes many rotations.

    • @TheDerisavi
      @TheDerisavi ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@YoureTerrificset the minute hand first and then set the jumping houre, it's faster than the traditional movements.

  • @Mile-long-list
    @Mile-long-list ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The He valve is actually for the bath you'll take in the secondary market

  • @imperialwatchco.1353
    @imperialwatchco.1353 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun review Evan! Loving all the on-wrist shots! Hope all is well and still would love to get you a watch to checkout! We are about to release some super fun new projects that I think you will enjoy, as well as have some others in the works. As always, just say the word and we'll make it happen! Thanks for your support!
    All the best,
    Ben

  • @ryanmcfadin09
    @ryanmcfadin09 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to know I'm not the only person to play disc golf in luxury watches haha. We are not alone

  • @btyc
    @btyc ปีที่แล้ว

    Handsome watch

  • @gld2139
    @gld2139 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks like a winner that will just plough through the complaints.

  • @oni-one574
    @oni-one574 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That thing is so big, it has it's own armed robbers that orbit in the street.

    • @almac9203
      @almac9203 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is quite compact given the specs. The Rolex challenge watch is way bigger and thicker.

  • @tuajay
    @tuajay ปีที่แล้ว

    The water pressure at a depth of 6000 mtrs is eq to 47450 Newtons/sq inch on the watch face, and that pressure is also eq to a waterfall pressure from a height of 593 mtrs …
    this clearly implies that such a Watch is fully capable of withstanding pressure of a crushing 100ft Seawave and/or a Shockwave of 194dB in real life ..
    thus the Watch is fully justified for its construction . . !!!

  • @Comotellamas131
    @Comotellamas131 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope Mrs. Terrific is doing well please tell her I said hi

  • @ruelanfurtado2191
    @ruelanfurtado2191 ปีที่แล้ว

    You knew we would all look at James Cameron's watch!

  • @paulbonaventura4969
    @paulbonaventura4969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *Invicta has entered the chat*

  • @tvo6453
    @tvo6453 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not as ridiculous as the Rolex Deepsea Challenge. The omega size is wearable

  • @PapriceP
    @PapriceP ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the platinum version of this watch on leather.

  • @michaelfierman3256
    @michaelfierman3256 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder why they didn't make them in ceramic to save weight. Maybe it couldn't reach those depths no one can reach?

  • @frankmai1824
    @frankmai1824 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now imagine the planet ocean 39.5mm with no helium escape valve

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว

      Gladly

    • @david12990
      @david12990 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes! I had that watch and really loved the look minus the HE and the thickness. Ended up selling it.

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville ปีที่แล้ว

    All throughout this video all I could think about was the sound this watch would make when I hit it on a door frame.
    Maybe with Omega-steel the watch would be okay but I don't think I would be okay. I'd have emotional problems after that. For instance, _why do I need this watch_ and _what am I worrying about_ and _are my thoughts really in italics?_

  • @GQguy24
    @GQguy24 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:56 it’s NOT “ugly” at all. But hey you do you buddy.

  • @dingodave3966
    @dingodave3966 ปีที่แล้ว

    And strong enough to be used as a hockey puck in case of emergency.

  • @jrbrown1989
    @jrbrown1989 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you mean "you have to set the hours and minutes separately"? Aint nobody forcing you to use that jump hour. Just set it like a normal watch 😅

  • @PapriceP
    @PapriceP ปีที่แล้ว

    Honestly I rarely go deeper than 300 meters when naked snorkelling.

  • @michaelriera6277
    @michaelriera6277 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don’t own this watch, but if I did, I’d sell it.

  • @wachtmeistereder
    @wachtmeistereder ปีที่แล้ว

    🎉🎉🎉 SEVEN INCH WRIST 🎉🎉🎉

  • @rodsalvador3608
    @rodsalvador3608 ปีที่แล้ว

    So deep, so deep. Put my bank account to sleep.

  • @kevinkohler2750
    @kevinkohler2750 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Omega, Please use this design for a regular Seamaster. Lume the arabics, NO FAUXTINA, and I'll prolly buy one.

  • @alexhemsath6235
    @alexhemsath6235 ปีที่แล้ว

    I WANT ONE

  • @hyogomarume8345
    @hyogomarume8345 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well how are you supposed to go treasrue hunting at the bottom of the ocean if the watch isn't resistant to magnets. lol

  • @michaelschwartz4306
    @michaelschwartz4306 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not 1 day per 100 feet. It's more like 1 day per 350 feet.

  • @N.S.56
    @N.S.56 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For the same money, I’d get the deep sea because it looks better, as far as depth, it’s like having two cars - one goes 225mph and one goes 210mph, you’ll never get that fast so what’s the other factors…

  • @loganholmberg2295
    @loganholmberg2295 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just dont see the point of this watch the deepest a human could theoretically go is 1000m for saturation diving but for practical purposes they don't go beyond 300m. I rather they lighten the watch for a practclie depth so its easier to wear. A 200 mph Ferrari might not be practical but I can at least you can use it at a track (although who bothers when there's plenty of highway available). I feel like they just made these for guys like James camron or people who've don't the titanic sub dive.

  • @sinan325
    @sinan325 ปีที่แล้ว

    Compare this to SEIKO King Turtle.

  • @mukkundsunjii
    @mukkundsunjii ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Buuuut…can it withstand the depth of my desk though?

  • @gospizana
    @gospizana ปีที่แล้ว

    Decompressing from 20,000 feet at 100 feet per day is 200 days, not 1,600.

    • @YoureTerrific
      @YoureTerrific  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How are you the first person to correct me and how did I mess up that easy math so terribly? I must have converted to wrist lengths somehow.

  • @JJ-rp2df
    @JJ-rp2df 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subways can be tough...

  • @williamstalvey6920
    @williamstalvey6920 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only Men need apply to wear it , love it and dont bitch about how big and thick this Cool watch is!!

  • @anonymouswatchguy4223
    @anonymouswatchguy4223 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your left arm is now swole AF.. nice watch though

  • @JohnH-mo5mb
    @JohnH-mo5mb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m not a diver, and you’re a smart guy, but at 100 feet per day, decompression time at a depth rating of 20,000 feet is very simply 200 days, not 1600.

  • @patricktepezano
    @patricktepezano 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gorgeous watch. Your wrist is too small? Start working out

  • @bloodymarvelous4790
    @bloodymarvelous4790 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's "wearable" like a pair of MSCHF Big Red Boots are "wearable".

  • @UltraDoug
    @UltraDoug ปีที่แล้ว

    I like almost everything about it, it just needs to be seriously flattened out to 10/11 mm.

  • @RK-zo9vs
    @RK-zo9vs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, I'll take one, in proper man size thanks!

  • @BM-si2ei
    @BM-si2ei ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This watch is based off such a laughable concept. But, considering how laughable mechanical wrist watches that cost more than $20 are, it fits right in.

  • @wristopia4101
    @wristopia4101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So you were wrong in your initial opinion?
    There are a lot things more pointless in a watch.
    Nobody actually uses a chronograph.
    Compass bezel is the most pointless.
    You could always get a Rolex Deepsea if you want something more wearable ; )

  • @drkesrf
    @drkesrf ปีที่แล้ว

    There’s a 38mm version now……

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 ปีที่แล้ว

      How tall? If too tall the proportions can be way off.

    • @drkesrf
      @drkesrf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelriera6277 I meant 39.5. It’s 14mm thick. Considering the dept rh rating that’s not bad.

  • @Dialandhands
    @Dialandhands ปีที่แล้ว

    Fuuuuucccckkkk! This thing is so much cooler than the Rolex seadweller. It’s just dummy cool!!…and dummy thiccc🤣