Nice, answered the one question I had about the new Chromecast around running emulator games faster! xD Anyways, it's such a kinda weird situation with Android regarding TVs... it has all to do with market logic, making people pay more for stuff, and all the economy around gadgets instead of making hardware advanced enough to cover all bases. I mean, it's counter intuitive that in this day and age, we still have "smart" TVs that have their own hardware and software that are: insecure, outdated, paralyzed in time, with a meager set of apps, with way less features than something like native Android. I bought myself a 55" Samsung smart TV when I moved to the apartment I'm currently living... some 3 to 4 years ago. Since then, the firmware might have been updated once or twice, no fundamental changes. It feels like using a laptop from a decade ago. Almost all apps are extremely outdated. And then when reports came of the whole thing being extremely insecure and easily hackable, I just disconnected it from the network altogether and stopped even trying to use. It's just horrible. And it was never good enough to use anyways... from day one the whole interface was sluggish as hell in a way that you might just use a chromecast or a laptop connected to it. Literally. It has load times reminiscent of Playstation 2. Anyways, back to Android, just think about it. If Android was adapted to run well with a remote control or even a gamepad alone (the entire thing, not just parts of it), and it was simply shoved inside a smart tv, vanilla getting updates directly from Google, no matter how much Android wasn't really made as a TV interface, I have the impression it'd still work way better than almost any solution in the market right now, including Google's own Chromecast. It would be kind of a wonky experience, but it just sounds to me that it'd still be worthwhile. Something that chinese smartwatch manufacturers might be realizing when putting full Android with some interface tweaks there, instead of trying to make a Tizen, or a specific Android Watch OS. Did you know it's kinda possible to run Pokemon Go in one of these chinese smartwatches? Yeah, I was surprised too. They have some models with quadcore CPUs and 1Gb of RAM running Android 5.1 for 100 bucks. Another solution: a docking station for your phone with all the USB OtG capabilities plus MHL. No need to pay for an extra electronic device, just the acessory with the necessary connectors to it. There are some solutions out there, but it's kinda hard to find smartphones that are completely compatible.... Samsung top of the line phones usually are. Of course, if the USB OtG and MHL were implemented thoroughly on all devices instead of having differences here and there, this would make way more sense. Made an experiment last year... bought myself a Roku stick, a Chromecast 2015 and a generic Miracast stick. I kept the Chromecast and the others were given away as xmas gifts for family members. And then the Chromecast proceded to fail on me as soon as I got back from vacation, but oh well. Roku's mirroring was in beta back then, I couldn't make it work with my smartphone, so I just gave it away to someone in the family that wanted to watch content without having to connect the smartphone to it. Miracast gave to people in the family that did not have a good enough internet connection to stream stuff... so it was mostly to put photos and stuff from the smartphone on the big TV. In any case, it's a bit frustrating to see the potential we have with a mobile device with Android, only to understand that the way the market works stops it from reaching it's full potential. If you were so inclined, you could have a powerful Android smartphone, for instance, that could connect directly to your TV with say, a docking station that also charged your device (wireless keyboard and mouse already works well via USB OtG), a laptop style case (like the previously reviewed Kangaroo laptop), a tablet style interface (just a touchscreen panel with a battery with a dock for your smartphone), making it also a gaming device for all cases. It already has native support for several gamepads and bluetooth stuff. This is something that you theoretically could do with several Android smartphones, but because it's not much advertised, because there are differences in implementation of those interfaces, and because brands and manufacturers really don't want you to replace all your gadgets with one device alone... we just fall short of getting there. Also the logic that has been ruining the USB Type-C implementation as well. I just got some USB OtG cables and USB Type-C hubs for my new OnePlus 3... OtG had to be enabled via an almost hidden configuration, and MHL is not supported at all. Waste of money and time. There's nothing stopping us today from having a single (or at most a couple) of devices per person that fullfills several roles... just standardization of protocols and ports, plus killing old practices from a market perspective. Not the sort of mentality that will take us to mars. :P
When you consider the ethernet port in the box it is actually only about $20 more. Regular Chromecast + ethernet/power-chord combo: $35 + $15 = $50 Chromecast Ultra: $70 Did you try out the youtube playback and deck controls via Google Home when you had it, Lon? It's pretty slick. I can't wait for the functionality to launch on Netflix. Hopefully the deck control functions work there too.
Should note that it requires hdcp 2.2. I found out that while my TV supports it my receiver does not even though it does do 4k pass through. So now i have a $70 1080p chromecast until i upgrade my receiver.
I have Dolby Atmos devices for my home theater" : LG 4K TV, Yamaha Receiver, Klipsch 5.1.2 speaker system (waiting on Apple TV tvOS 12) Will Chromecast stream the Dolby audio format properly?
How can you check to see if your TV can automatically broadcast content in 4K? I have a 4K TV and it allows me to connect to various streaming services through the internet using Samsung connectivity. How can I educate myself?
I picked up a Chromecast Ultra today . Main reason being it[s the cheapest device that supports the new HDR format TH-cam has started offering in the last year . Support is still very limited and most devices that support it are more expensive, or it's hit or miss whether or not the TV's built in TH-cam app has support. Simply supporting TH-cam 4k isn't enough . The HDR feature uses a specific codec a lot of devices don't support currently .
Thank you for this concise review. I found all the information I was seeking in the first 60 seconds. Now I am going to go watch your review on the original device.
Hi Lon, I have a question for you, have you ever tried to use the AC ethernet adapter(the one that comes on the Chromecast Ultra) on a Firestick TV ? Do you know if doing this improve the connectivity speed or somehow have a faster connection?
Good review. I have a Samsung TV 4K which is 2 years old. If I watch you tube despite having 100mb broadband, I cannot see 4K on TH-cam. If I was to use this Chromecast 2, would it actually upscale it to 4K?
There is a problem is no one is talking about the Audio as the 5.1 Audio is only compatible to certain TVs as my 2014 4K Samsung it was not. When I hooked it up to this TV you will get a 4K image but only Stereo Audio. Then I hooked it up to my 4K receiver I got 5.1 Sound but then the picture was only 1080P as I don't know why as my Ultra Blu-ray player works fine on it. The reason I got this as I have a Google Home Mini and it was a device that could take advantage of the Mini
Lon, what would be better for streaming to the Chromecast, wireless AC or wired via a powerline network? Trying to determine if it's worth investing in a powerline network or if my synology RT2600AC router will be faster. It's hard to find conclusive information comparing the two. Thanks.
It depends .. I've always been disappointed with Powerline in that it doesn't work consistently. Moca is a good alternative. In full disclosure they're a sponsor now but I really believe it's a good alternative to powerline in that it's almost as good as ethernet. lon.tv/moca
Does ultra version has the same big delays while streaming video from PC or Mobile? I mean cases when chromecast can't get video directly from the Internet.
Hi Lon! I have an Ipad Air. what features on iPad Air can I use with Chromecast? I think there is no screen mirroring. so what else can be done? for example, Can I use TH-cam or cast my whole browser screen (on my iPad) to the Chromecast? It would be great to publish a short movie about this. the title would be "using Ipad with Chromecast, what can be done". tnx.
It must have a hardware HEVC decoder ? Can you test with some 10bjt files on plex ? You might have to alter the plex streaming profile if they haven't updated for this
Interesting, I don't have the Google Photos, FB and Flickr options (+ news but that's probably a regional thing) in my Google Home app on iOS. Is this exclusive to the actual Chromecast? I tried setting up a custom picture backdrop on my Shield TV the other day but could only pick from the Google stock options. Nice review, I hope the Chromecast Ultra will be available before Christmas over here in Europe.
This is an 'Android TV' vs Chromecast proper thing. Not sure if there is any difference with iOS app though. Here is a link to a G+ post pointing to an article about an Android TV app which addresses it. I linked the G+ post rather than directly to the article as the app developer and others have commented on it there. plus.google.com/u/0/+JRRaphael/posts/4EoU4c6zMRU
ETHERNET! Your forgot, I got 1080p but the CAT5e Jack on the charger is worth it for large homes or like me--crowded apartments with many WiFi hotspots.
With the advent of the cheap non smart 4k TVs you can pick up at Costco (Haier) and other retailers, this Chromecast is incredible value. Who needs an LG OLED in their garage?
It does. And I would add that performance is identical on the V2 (2015) version when using the Ethernet adapter; very good. I mesured about 120ms delay on both. Not fast enough for fast paced games like racing or the like, but more than enough for RPGs like FFVII and whatnot.
Is the Chromecast Ultra super buggy like the original Chromecast? I bought that one and it was almost unusable and totally frustrating. It was not a wifi signal problem. It just kept crashing all the time. I have wifi connection two feet away from the chromecast.
hi, my cc 2 when playing back a movie from my plex PC server stutters it's playback somewhat but the TV through dlna is perfect but without metadata, would the cc Ethernet connection solve this issue do you think?
I am experiencing frame drops 1 or 2 times every minute, both on TH-cam and Netflix and both HD and 4K content. I have tested several videos and compared with casting from my Nvidia Shield. On the shield I experience no frame drops at all. My network is all wired. Can anyone confirm this issue with the CC Ultra?
That depends on what you want to use it for. The Mibox is Android TV meaning it runs the android 6.0 operating system. You can use it to cast but also runs native apps, has a remote with voice search, can be used to play games, etc. All the Chromecast does it cast. Since they are both 4K it would really be up to you if you want something simple or something that can do more. The Mibox being about the same price I would personally go with it.
I am sure they wanted to keep the price down lon, but it takes a heck of a lot stronger hardware to push 4k than 1080 and im sure you know that. Its still by far the cheapest 4k HDR streaming player at 70 bucks, i think you should have mentioned that.
Lon mentions this at 4:30. My wifes father has a new Philips tv with horrible internet abilities and he is very happy with the Chromecast. That tv isn't 4k though. I have no idea how big the market is for this 4k device but the regular chromecast is still a great option for people who just want things to work easy with their tv.
Hey, Lon, great video, as always! I'm looking for a cheap windows mini pc with HDMI 2.0 for video and gaming streaming - anything around 150$, just for streaming. Problem is, HDMI 2.0 seens a relatively common feature for android TV boxes, but unheard off in unexpensive windows mini pcs! Do you know of any good option for me? Thanks!
Maybe, but I really don't need anything fancy, nothing powerfull, just a quiet and small pc to stream for, with HDMI 2.0 for 4k video streaming... If I was satisfied with android ecosystem and interface I would have devices just like I need for less than 50 dollars...
This shit will Not connect to a PC. Google does Not give a telephone technical support and gives you wrong instructions. Chromecast extensions do Not exist anymore on windows 7 and 10.
This guy gets hundreds of comments a week I can't can't answer all of them. And if you want a specific answer you need to ask a more specific question.
I'm so definitely buying a Chromecast whenever I get a Chance and I can't wait
Nice, answered the one question I had about the new Chromecast around running emulator games faster! xD
Anyways, it's such a kinda weird situation with Android regarding TVs... it has all to do with market logic, making people pay more for stuff, and all the economy around gadgets instead of making hardware advanced enough to cover all bases.
I mean, it's counter intuitive that in this day and age, we still have "smart" TVs that have their own hardware and software that are: insecure, outdated, paralyzed in time, with a meager set of apps, with way less features than something like native Android.
I bought myself a 55" Samsung smart TV when I moved to the apartment I'm currently living... some 3 to 4 years ago. Since then, the firmware might have been updated once or twice, no fundamental changes. It feels like using a laptop from a decade ago. Almost all apps are extremely outdated. And then when reports came of the whole thing being extremely insecure and easily hackable, I just disconnected it from the network altogether and stopped even trying to use. It's just horrible. And it was never good enough to use anyways... from day one the whole interface was sluggish as hell in a way that you might just use a chromecast or a laptop connected to it. Literally. It has load times reminiscent of Playstation 2.
Anyways, back to Android, just think about it. If Android was adapted to run well with a remote control or even a gamepad alone (the entire thing, not just parts of it), and it was simply shoved inside a smart tv, vanilla getting updates directly from Google, no matter how much Android wasn't really made as a TV interface, I have the impression it'd still work way better than almost any solution in the market right now, including Google's own Chromecast.
It would be kind of a wonky experience, but it just sounds to me that it'd still be worthwhile. Something that chinese smartwatch manufacturers might be realizing when putting full Android with some interface tweaks there, instead of trying to make a Tizen, or a specific Android Watch OS. Did you know it's kinda possible to run Pokemon Go in one of these chinese smartwatches? Yeah, I was surprised too. They have some models with quadcore CPUs and 1Gb of RAM running Android 5.1 for 100 bucks.
Another solution: a docking station for your phone with all the USB OtG capabilities plus MHL. No need to pay for an extra electronic device, just the acessory with the necessary connectors to it. There are some solutions out there, but it's kinda hard to find smartphones that are completely compatible.... Samsung top of the line phones usually are. Of course, if the USB OtG and MHL were implemented thoroughly on all devices instead of having differences here and there, this would make way more sense.
Made an experiment last year... bought myself a Roku stick, a Chromecast 2015 and a generic Miracast stick. I kept the Chromecast and the others were given away as xmas gifts for family members. And then the Chromecast proceded to fail on me as soon as I got back from vacation, but oh well.
Roku's mirroring was in beta back then, I couldn't make it work with my smartphone, so I just gave it away to someone in the family that wanted to watch content without having to connect the smartphone to it. Miracast gave to people in the family that did not have a good enough internet connection to stream stuff... so it was mostly to put photos and stuff from the smartphone on the big TV.
In any case, it's a bit frustrating to see the potential we have with a mobile device with Android, only to understand that the way the market works stops it from reaching it's full potential.
If you were so inclined, you could have a powerful Android smartphone, for instance, that could connect directly to your TV with say, a docking station that also charged your device (wireless keyboard and mouse already works well via USB OtG), a laptop style case (like the previously reviewed Kangaroo laptop), a tablet style interface (just a touchscreen panel with a battery with a dock for your smartphone), making it also a gaming device for all cases. It already has native support for several gamepads and bluetooth stuff.
This is something that you theoretically could do with several Android smartphones, but because it's not much advertised, because there are differences in implementation of those interfaces, and because brands and manufacturers really don't want you to replace all your gadgets with one device alone... we just fall short of getting there.
Also the logic that has been ruining the USB Type-C implementation as well. I just got some USB OtG cables and USB Type-C hubs for my new OnePlus 3... OtG had to be enabled via an almost hidden configuration, and MHL is not supported at all. Waste of money and time.
There's nothing stopping us today from having a single (or at most a couple) of devices per person that fullfills several roles... just standardization of protocols and ports, plus killing old practices from a market perspective. Not the sort of mentality that will take us to mars. :P
When you consider the ethernet port in the box it is actually only about $20 more.
Regular Chromecast + ethernet/power-chord combo: $35 + $15 = $50
Chromecast Ultra: $70
Did you try out the youtube playback and deck controls via Google Home when you had it, Lon?
It's pretty slick. I can't wait for the functionality to launch on Netflix. Hopefully the deck control functions work there too.
Should note that it requires hdcp 2.2. I found out that while my TV supports it my receiver does not even though it does do 4k pass through. So now i have a $70 1080p chromecast until i upgrade my receiver.
I have Dolby Atmos devices for my home theater" : LG 4K TV, Yamaha Receiver, Klipsch 5.1.2 speaker system (waiting on Apple TV tvOS 12) Will Chromecast stream the Dolby audio format properly?
How can you check to see if your TV can automatically broadcast content in 4K? I have a 4K TV and it allows me to connect to various streaming services through the internet using Samsung connectivity. How can I educate myself?
When can I watch your review on 4k
I picked up a Chromecast Ultra today . Main reason being it[s the cheapest device that supports the new HDR format TH-cam has started offering in the last year . Support is still very limited and most devices that support it are more expensive, or it's hit or miss whether or not the TV's built in TH-cam app has support. Simply supporting TH-cam 4k isn't enough . The HDR feature uses a specific codec a lot of devices don't support currently .
Thank you for this concise review. I found all the information I was seeking in the first 60 seconds. Now I am going to go watch your review on the original device.
Hi Lon, I have a question for you, have you ever tried to use the AC ethernet adapter(the one that comes on the Chromecast Ultra) on a Firestick TV ? Do you know if doing this improve the connectivity speed or somehow have a faster connection?
Good review. I have a Samsung TV 4K which is 2 years old. If I watch you tube despite having 100mb broadband, I cannot see 4K on TH-cam. If I was to use this Chromecast 2, would it actually upscale it to 4K?
There is a problem is no one is talking about the Audio as the 5.1 Audio is only compatible to certain TVs as my 2014 4K Samsung it was not. When I hooked it up to this TV you will get a 4K image but only Stereo Audio. Then I hooked it up to my 4K receiver I got 5.1 Sound but then the picture was only 1080P as I don't know why as my Ultra Blu-ray player works fine on it. The reason I got this as I have a Google Home Mini and it was a device that could take advantage of the Mini
How long is the power cable for people who mount there TV on the wall who want to use the Ethernet port on the power adapter.
Lon, what would be better for streaming to the Chromecast, wireless AC or wired via a powerline network? Trying to determine if it's worth investing in a powerline network or if my synology RT2600AC router will be faster. It's hard to find conclusive information comparing the two. Thanks.
It depends .. I've always been disappointed with Powerline in that it doesn't work consistently. Moca is a good alternative. In full disclosure they're a sponsor now but I really believe it's a good alternative to powerline in that it's almost as good as ethernet. lon.tv/moca
Thanks for the review Lon, would it support direct play using plex? Most of my movies are on MKV :)
I think your Plex server will likely have to do some transcoding, I'll take a look at that as my Plex films are mostly MKVs too :)
Lon.TV tank you so much, that's going to help me a lot to bring my dad's old TV into the plex world without maxing out my asustor NAS :)
wait does the 35 dollar one also run in 60fps?
No - it looks like that is one thing the Ultra can do that the other one cannot. I'll add this to the errata for Monday's wrap up.
Lon.TV Ok thanks for the reply.
I'm late, but the Chromecast 2 (and maybe the first one, too) can (finally) stream TH-cam videos at 60 fps now.
I like your old school background. I am a subscriber. Peace and blessings.
Will this make Sling TV run in 4K resolution and sharper video since it supports 4k ?
Does ultra version has the same big delays while streaming video from PC or Mobile? I mean cases when chromecast can't get video directly from the Internet.
so this device is not necessary if you have a smart tv?
What about the chromecast 3 with ethernet with a desktop with ethernet, mirror casting? What is the latency for that?
I like the classic Mac in the background. How much is that worth to a collector??
what is that screen do you use to demonstrate in this video at 3.18?
Hi Lon! I have an Ipad Air. what features on iPad Air can I use with Chromecast? I think there is no screen mirroring. so what else can be done? for example, Can I use TH-cam or cast my whole browser screen (on my iPad) to the Chromecast? It would be great to publish a short movie about this. the title would be "using Ipad with Chromecast, what can be done". tnx.
It must have a hardware HEVC decoder ? Can you test with some 10bjt files on plex ? You might have to alter the plex streaming profile if they haven't updated for this
Can you browse the web on your tv with this?
Interesting, I don't have the Google Photos, FB and Flickr options (+ news but that's probably a regional thing) in my Google Home app on iOS. Is this exclusive to the actual Chromecast? I tried setting up a custom picture backdrop on my Shield TV the other day but could only pick from the Google stock options.
Nice review, I hope the Chromecast Ultra will be available before Christmas over here in Europe.
This is an 'Android TV' vs Chromecast proper thing. Not sure if there is any difference with iOS app though.
Here is a link to a G+ post pointing to an article about an Android TV app which addresses it.
I linked the G+ post rather than directly to the article as the app developer and others have commented on it there.
plus.google.com/u/0/+JRRaphael/posts/4EoU4c6zMRU
*****
Oh thank you very much! This seems very promising. What a weird thing to omit by Google...
Does it support bitstreaming DTS MA or Dolby True HD audio this time around? Also noticed in the video it has 50hz option but still no 24hz.
From the thumbnail it looked like this was a review for a pan!
Are you going to review the Nintendo Classic or PS4 Pro??
I always enjoy watching your videos , very informative, thank you
Hey lon,
Which one is a better deal between Mi Box and Chromecast Ultra?
chasedoe MiBox
chasedoe Mi Box. I will slowly be replacing my old CC with Mi Box. already have an Nvidia Shield TV so no rush at this point.
does it make sens to have a 4k smart (android or not) tv with this Chromecast Ultra ?!?!???!!?
Danke, super einfach erklärt und mit den richtigen Bildern
Does it lag? While mirroring smartphone screen?
ETHERNET! Your forgot, I got 1080p but the CAT5e Jack on the charger is worth it for large homes or like me--crowded apartments with many WiFi hotspots.
+Robert Taylor I covered Ethernet in the video. It's also available on the original via an additional accessory - also mentioned
With the advent of the cheap non smart 4k TVs you can pick up at Costco (Haier) and other retailers, this Chromecast is incredible value. Who needs an LG OLED in their garage?
Hey Lon!
Does the casting/mirroring work when Chromecast is connected to the network via ethernet?
It does. And I would add that performance is identical on the V2 (2015) version when using the Ethernet adapter; very good. I mesured about 120ms delay on both. Not fast enough for fast paced games like racing or the like, but more than enough for RPGs like FFVII and whatnot.
Thanks Man!
how can you do game streaming when the screen is off ?
Is the Chromecast Ultra super buggy like the original Chromecast? I bought that one and it was almost unusable and totally frustrating. It was not a wifi signal problem. It just kept crashing all the time. I have wifi connection two feet away from the chromecast.
hi, my cc 2 when playing back a movie from my plex PC server stutters it's playback somewhat but the TV through dlna is perfect but without metadata, would the cc Ethernet connection solve this issue do you think?
I am experiencing frame drops 1 or 2 times every minute, both on TH-cam and Netflix and both HD and 4K content. I have tested several videos and compared with casting from my Nvidia Shield. On the shield I experience no frame drops at all. My network is all wired. Can anyone confirm this issue with the CC Ultra?
How it will work with wired ethernet connection, i mean how the android phone interact with chromecast when its wired ??
It works the same way, the only difference is that the chromecast is hard wired to the network.
Lon.TV will my phone be able to detect chromecast ultra without wifi ?? As it is ethernet connected, do i hv to turn on location ??
Hi There, good video thank you. Do you know what hdmi version this uses? I can’t find it anywhere. Thanks again.
Not sure you mean, which version?
Lon.TV hiya Lon, I mean HDMI 1.4, 2.0a, 2.0b etc. I'm also wondering if it's HDCP 2.2 compatible. Thanks!
Which one wud u recommend this or the mibox???
That depends on what you want to use it for. The Mibox is Android TV meaning it runs the android 6.0 operating system. You can use it to cast but also runs native apps, has a remote with voice search, can be used to play games, etc. All the Chromecast does it cast. Since they are both 4K it would really be up to you if you want something simple or something that can do more. The Mibox being about the same price I would personally go with it.
Rishab Agarwal The Mi Box also has Chromecast built in. Go with the Mi box
I thought he is reviewing frying pan based on video picture 😂
Hey Lon, did you try out the Ethernet port?
Yes all of the demoing I did with the Chromecast in the video was done with the ethernet connection. I'll talk more about it on the wrapup this week.
OK. Thanks! I guess I didn't catch you connecting it that way. I'll watch the recap.
Makes the fire Tv 4k look a lot more attractive
I am sure they wanted to keep the price down lon, but it takes a heck of a lot stronger hardware to push 4k than 1080 and im sure you know that. Its still by far the cheapest 4k HDR streaming player at 70 bucks, i think you should have mentioned that.
streaming hdr10 content ... how?
which hdr10 media player can stream at this moment? ...
Wait wtf. Wouldn't most 4k TV's be smart TV's that have youtube and netflix apps anyways?!
Sure, but a Chromecast can do much more than only youtube and netflix..
I guess, I can't imagine many people using it for more than that though
Lon mentions this at 4:30. My wifes father has a new Philips tv with horrible internet abilities and he is very happy with the Chromecast. That tv isn't 4k though. I have no idea how big the market is for this 4k device but the regular chromecast is still a great option for people who just want things to work easy with their tv.
iFayt9034 Yes, but you get much more with the Chromecast. also, the Smart UI is horrible on both Vizio and Samsung. Too slow.
iFayt9034
Hey, Lon, great video, as always! I'm looking for a cheap windows mini pc with HDMI 2.0 for video and gaming streaming - anything around 150$, just for streaming. Problem is, HDMI 2.0 seens a relatively common feature for android TV boxes, but unheard off in unexpensive windows mini pcs! Do you know of any good option for me? Thanks!
Maybe, but I really don't need anything fancy, nothing powerfull, just a quiet and small pc to stream for, with HDMI 2.0 for 4k video streaming... If I was satisfied with android ecosystem and interface I would have devices just like I need for less than 50 dollars...
Can you run Koby on chromecast
Bo Rerun you can shoot Kodi media to a Chromecast, just google Chromecast Kodi.
The irony is I am watching this on a Chromecast (original).
Why no talk about the sound?
My god is nobody going to mention the amount of app pages he has on his iPhone.
Mines keep buffering and stuttering
Lon. Please review the Acer Chromebook R13
DETahaX He just did
I would think ... all 4k TVs now days are smart TVs that could already do this ... no ?
Great review!
yeah definitely skipping this one I have the 35 one and it's great
Great video ot helped a lot Thanks 😊
$70. just for a resolution?
I think I will stick with the nvidia shield
Thank you for this video. I think I'm going to skip out of this one. $70 I can spent my money on something better.
cool review thank you
Farhan was here
Thanks Lon :-)
This shit will Not connect to a PC. Google does Not give a telephone technical support and gives you wrong instructions. Chromecast extensions do Not exist anymore on windows 7 and 10.
Corrections: Chromecast extensions do Not exist anymore on the latest Google Chrome
who is watching on a chromecast
Seems this guy doesn't answer any questions!
This guy gets hundreds of comments a week I can't can't answer all of them. And if you want a specific answer you need to ask a more specific question.