The iPad from 1998

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 419

  • @lukemiani
    @lukemiani  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    What are some of the coolest old pieces of tech from this era? Plus, check out FREE Download Filmora 13 PC:bit.ly/3x2eSaj

    • @edgarwalk5637
      @edgarwalk5637 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The PSION 5mx.

    • @Nobachu
      @Nobachu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i have no idea

    • @NexGen-3D
      @NexGen-3D 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had a Laptop made by Canon with a built in injet printer, I think from memory, it was a 486 processor and it was the first machine I ran Linux on...yes I'm old, I think it was called a a NoteJet.

    • @NexGen-3D
      @NexGen-3D 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh another one I had, was the Tapwave Zodiac, at the time, this was the most stunning handheld console with almost no games for it, but the few there was, were far better than anything else on the market, and better than anything many years later, ran PalmOS.

    • @NexGen-3D
      @NexGen-3D 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh and don't forget about the HP iPAQ and the Dell Axim, I owned these too, the later had an nVidia GPU too.

  • @iCaveDave
    @iCaveDave 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +395

    When you asked what Access is I was stunned. That was MS Office’s Database application back in the day, did a bunch of work on that in high school

    • @thewubmachine840
      @thewubmachine840 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Now days there are Apple iPads everywhere and you can send mail via the internet.

    • @calorion
      @calorion 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I hated that app so much.

    • @MrCed122
      @MrCed122 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Back in the day? It's still part of the Microsoft 365 suite, we use it at work to modify our PostgreSQL in a more graphical way and to store temporary data. One of our clients was still using it for time management up until 2021.

    • @_sabot
      @_sabot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Entire companies were (or still) based on MS Access. There was always this one dude who knew his way around it, fiddled his strange VBA macros together and was therefore irredeemable.

    • @calorion
      @calorion 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@_sabot You mean "irreplaceable," but I like the idea of Access experts being irredeemable :->

  • @vvgr409
    @vvgr409 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +185

    Good video and nice device. One thing - Windows CE is not based on Windows 95. It is completely separate codebase based on different kernel, not based on Windows 9x or Windows NT. It was created by Microsoft for devices like PDA, mobile phones (mobile Windows up to Windows Phone 7 was based on Windows CE), embedded devices etc. It also doesn't run desktop Windows software. I guess this was the reason why this device wasn't very popular.

    • @orangeyellow-me1pz
      @orangeyellow-me1pz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Windows mobile 6.x and lower was very popular and it was running Windows ce.

    • @ELMASQUELAMONTA
      @ELMASQUELAMONTA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What was the original price

    • @lpemkz
      @lpemkz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I had a Compaq iPAQ and an HP iPAQ with windows CE. A few years later I bought an HTC Phone with a sliding keyboard. I used them as an MP3 Player, to work with Excel sheets and for directions and maps with the Rand McNally road atlas later I used Google Maps.

    • @thewiirocks
      @thewiirocks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Exactly this. Windows CE was the kiss of death for any product. No one took it seriously outside of a small handful of enthusiasts. Microsoft tried to bring the same Kiss of Death to the Dreamcast and caused Sega to back away so fast it would make your head spin.

    • @Epicgamer_Mac
      @Epicgamer_Mac 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Microsoft made devices that were PDA? Naughty Microsoft

  • @Cartagena1
    @Cartagena1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    YOOOOO. OK, so I remember seeing a picture of one of these things appearing in a magazine at my mom’s hair salon when I was in middle school. That was the only time I ever saw any evidence of this thing existing and then NEVER heard about it again, but I remember seeing the ad and thinking it was the coolest computer I’d ever seen and for like a year I wanted it more than anything I’d ever wanted in my entire life at that point (it’s since been replaced by a desire for affordable housing and a viable sense of self-worth, but I digress). After awhile I forgot about it entirely and life went on. I randomly thought about it again sometime in my early 20s during the netbook craze and thought about going online to look for one, but I couldn’t for the life of me remember the model number and nobody I asked had any idea what I was talking about. Completely frustrating. When I tell you as soon as I saw the thumbnail for this video my heart STOPPED. I DIDN’T imagine it after all, it really WAS a thing that existed! VALIDATION

  • @Martin_from_SC
    @Martin_from_SC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    It failed because it was Windows CE. it was extremely limited.

    • @_sabot
      @_sabot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      And CE didn't based on Win95 (and neither on NT), it was it's complete own thing.

    • @thelbtlover
      @thelbtlover 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Yeah but you could say the same thing about the iPad. iPads didn't run full Windows software yet they took off. Why? Because people actually built programs for them. Windows CE wasn't the problem, it was the lack of apps. The same thing that killed Windows Phone, Windows RT, and what will kill Windows 11 in S mode. Also, the iPad was treated as a standalone device. Apple didn't expect you to have to plug it into a computer in order to do anything meaningful with it. Just the fact that they felt the need to have this device (and all Windows CE devices) plug into a computer shows you that they didn't take Windows CE seriously as a standalone operating system.

    • @rickiehoxton
      @rickiehoxton 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Win CE was garbage! Vastly inferior to palm and psion. Typical Microsoft

    • @gehteuchnichtsan7911
      @gehteuchnichtsan7911 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol ipad os is even more limited now hahaha

    • @kendricrautomusprime
      @kendricrautomusprime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My words exactly 😆👍

  • @ken1w
    @ken1w 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Also known as “Clio” by Vadem, the company that developed it. I owned one, and used it actively for a few years. Quite usable for basic “office” functions, like word processing, spreadsheets, email, etc. I really liked the keyboard feel although not full-sized. I often used my fingernail on the screen instead of the stylus. The location of stick-like battery also served as a handle to make it easy to grip and hold with one hand in tablet mode, unlike recent iPads with “edge-to-edge” screen. When I pulled it out in a public place, people would ask me about it because it was mostly unknown even when new and being sold by Vadem and Sharp. It failed because it ran Windows CE, the light-weight mobile version of Windows that never caught on.

  • @rfog
    @rfog 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Luke, the "thing" at minute 2:27 is not a VGA but a RS232 Serial Port, or for a mouse or industrial usage. VGA connector has 3 lines of pins.

    • @thomas_xsg
      @thomas_xsg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      When a gen Y talks about 80/90s stuff and gets half of it wrong 😅

    • @kc7klz
      @kc7klz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thomas_xsg Yep, it is a DB-9. A VGA is a DB-15. The cable in the box is probably a serial cable. Most likely a null modem cable so you can attach it to your serial port on your desktop and sync the data from Outlook CE to Outlook on your desktop.

    • @thomas_xsg
      @thomas_xsg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kc7klz wow! This is such a throwback. I used those cables to get emails into my palm device back in the day. Back then it was totally normal and accepted to get your emails via a cable from your desktop. 😂 How far we have come…

  • @DavidWasman
    @DavidWasman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    So, uh, that dongle is a Serial Port. Not VGA.

    • @orangeyellow-me1pz
      @orangeyellow-me1pz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Lol, give him a break. He was much too young to really know what it was.

    • @c0rnd0g_19
      @c0rnd0g_19 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Came down here to say the same.

    • @TheCatherineCC
      @TheCatherineCC 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I hereby call this meeting of the ibuprofen club to order...

    • @jamestomato1744
      @jamestomato1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheCatherineCC (I mean me personally, I'm more of the Acetaminophen club to be honest)...

    • @kc7klz
      @kc7klz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey, I said that when I watched it. You used it to attached to your computer and dump you e-mails and documents that you composed on the road to your desktop computer.

  • @SvenReinck
    @SvenReinck 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This is literally modern archeology ❤

  • @iblackfeathers
    @iblackfeathers 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    1998 was in the decade where decent usb ports didn’t exist yet. that form factor was related to the i-opener, an internet appliance with the same form factor but not portable. it was mean to go in the kitchen or desk and hook with a landline for internet. folks back then were hacking it by multibooting it and making a full blown pc for under $200. that was big back then when average pcs were considered very expensive.

    • @fred-youtube
      @fred-youtube 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To the point that the fompany filed for bankruptcy because the I-openets were sold at a loss.

  • @bionic_warrior
    @bionic_warrior 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Bit sad we didn’t see your dads old one get fired up to see what he used it for back in the day! Very interesting device glad I now know it existed.

    • @takwu0
      @takwu0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      these devices do not have persistent storage, so once the main battery charge is gone, it uses the coin battery to keep the data. once that is gone too, all your data and apps are gone. basically factory reset.
      you could save some files to flash memory card, but that can be accessed with any card reader in another device.

  • @paranoidhumanoid
    @paranoidhumanoid 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I love this. You see the visionary ingenuity of Japanese companies like Sharp long before these form factors became a mainstay.

  • @Garrettdx1988
    @Garrettdx1988 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I had no idea this thing existed and I'm genuinely impressed. Apparently I wouldn't have needed much more power from a computer back in the day because all I did was use Internet Explorer (or AOL) and play those pre-installed games

    • @belstar1128
      @belstar1128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you would need more power even for that lol

  • @hilleldei9174
    @hilleldei9174 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Love the aesthetic.

  • @mibnsharpals
    @mibnsharpals 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    From today's perspective it was modest, but not back then. Windows CE ran on many devices that required little power and were designed for specific purposes.
    Especially, diagnostic devices and POS systems. It was also real-time capable. But it wasn't a universal operating system, but rather modular. If necessary you could also just install the kernel.
    And this device was probably intended more for warehouse management.

  • @karolbabinski
    @karolbabinski 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is just perfect inspiration for a new Magic Keyboard design!

  • @mradford10
    @mradford10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’m the same vintage as your Dad so was there at the time. These types of devices failed for a number of reasons. They were outrageously expensive and you could put that money towards a desktop and get way more functionality - mobile computing was a poor experience to say the least. Devices like this tried to sell a dream. They were horrible at networking, as Windows at the time was horrible at networking just in general. They were janky in that there were lots of drivers and updates, installing applications was tedious and not always completely successful and printing was not enjoyable to say the least. So while this device might trick you into thinking it was an iPad of its day, to compare the two devices is like comparing a Tesla to a potato. I’m not shocked they never succeeded.

  • @manaphyex3964
    @manaphyex3964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    When the PC RAM was smaller than CPU cache memory of today.

    • @Fetidaf
      @Fetidaf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I honestly have more RAM than I did storage 10-15 years ago lol
      Kinda crazy how computers evolve like that and so quickly.

    • @fred-youtube
      @fred-youtube 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just imagine Win CE on a modern system

  • @FactsBeFacts
    @FactsBeFacts 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Don't forget about the Toshiba Libretto from 1996 which ran full fat Windows. That was a netbook years before netbooks.

  • @NomeIndeciso
    @NomeIndeciso 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    At 10:30 -- Now that this is older tech, it's actually almost charming and pretty funny how the audio recording and playback sounds like an early-1900's phonograph.

    • @aarupoudyal1378
      @aarupoudyal1378 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i have a samsung phone from i think 2009 which sounds exactly the same when using the audiorecording and playback

  • @janquieldapper
    @janquieldapper 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Fail for 2 reasons... NO Windows 95 / NO GAMES

  • @gabrielgon3408
    @gabrielgon3408 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love these old devices that got it right decades ago.

  • @Alexander0189
    @Alexander0189 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I actually LOVE this form factor. Would love this form factor in a modern laptop.

  • @taxineil1
    @taxineil1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back in the 90's a friend got a brilliant job testing and selling this sort of gear.One time he came home with a tablet that was A4 size,had a stylus like the s-pen which plugged into the screen.It was nearly 1" thick had its own shoulder bag,weighed a lot! and was never released as it had too many faults.At the time though it was straight out of Star Trek-and he knew it,posing everywhere.He worked for them about six years and retired before he was 40 a full blown millionaire.

  • @kc7klz
    @kc7klz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the late 1990's, I was working for a company that did barcoding equipment, and mobile/handheld computers. With my heavy PC background, I was the one who worked on the PalmOS devices and WindowsCE devices. The touch screen setup screen brings back found memories, and a few nightmares. If the touchscreen won't calibrate, the OS won't boot. The worst part is when the touchscreen calibrates wrong. It is impossible to factory reset the device. I replaced a lot of them in the day.

  • @ftnetops4264
    @ftnetops4264 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had the compaq Tablet in School in 2005, and was the only one with a tablet. It was a killer device with onenote and kept me organized.

  • @christiancarter7563
    @christiancarter7563 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The fact that the battery worked is just 🤯

  • @silvy7394
    @silvy7394 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Electrical engineer here: If the battery has a proper BMS then it definitely can last this long in storage. Those cells can sit at a low SOC for a long time and still work when you try to recharge them, as long as the BMS or self discharge didnt pull the cells under 2.8v. The only degradation that would happen otherwise is callendar aging, in which these batteries are good for at least 25 years if you dont really use them much during that duration.

  • @AshiqurRahman
    @AshiqurRahman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In my opinion, this is the most practical form of a tablet pc. I really need this kind of device. Apple won't make their ipad like this. Because that would make the Macbook obsolete .

  • @kavierocks
    @kavierocks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You know someone is young when they don't know what Microsoft Access is.

  • @mrspocksson9687
    @mrspocksson9687 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had the MainSteet Networks Clio version of this device. Loved it except for WinCE. Not sure why I don’t have it today as it was a great form factor. Lack of WiFi was also a challenge, so was much more useful with a wifi card. Thanks for allowing me to reminisce. - Typed on a Handspring Prism with the cellular Springboard module.

  • @user_data_missing
    @user_data_missing 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I would really like to see a teardown of this thing

    • @RichWithTech
      @RichWithTech 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's gonna be less effort to open than convertable

  • @MichaelBelisarioDG
    @MichaelBelisarioDG 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Interesting. I see similarities to the Apple eMate which was out in 1997.

    • @pankometa
      @pankometa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nah, it was much better than eMate. eMate was more of a calculator on steroids. This was a full-sized notebook / handheld.

  • @petersziraki7672
    @petersziraki7672 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like these old-tech videos! Please do more :) .

  • @rogerlai3197
    @rogerlai3197 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used a Sharp PDA back in the late 80's and early 90's, and then late 90's I used PDA like HP, NEC, etc running Windows CE, and they weree great products. Of course when come to comparing the iPad launched back in 2007 and later, these vintage PDAs were going nowhere, but they did a great age for mobile Digital Assistants to tons of business executives. Thanks to Sharp and a few good companies like HP, Compaq, Microsoft, etc.

  • @andresbravo2003
    @andresbravo2003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Geez this was old! Windows CE might not been my favorite, but I would prefer the modern iPad.

  • @S33kPlayer
    @S33kPlayer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is why I watch your channel from time to time

  • @JoeBruin1999
    @JoeBruin1999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your dad was alive in 1998! Impressive. That sounds mathematically... correct.
    This is the same WinCE I had on my HP Jornada. Look it up. It was super kewl, and impossible to touch type because they forgot one thing: you can't shrink human hands.
    Same reason the Toshiba Libretto never caught on. Look that up too. It's called "Human Factors" in Psychology or "Ergonomics" in Engineering.
    The 1990s was the computer miniaturization Inflection Point. We could finally make a laptop and keyboard smaller that the human hands could use.
    Final example of kewl but too small: HP Omnibook 800. It even had a pop out mouse! But the computer was way too small to use.
    BTW, you forgot to lose your mind at 3% battery. Cheers.

  • @dibyadip
    @dibyadip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Luke! Experiencing déjà vu in your video! I distinctly recall Windows XP tablet PCs from the early 2000s, roughly between 2001 and 2003. So, tablet PCs definitely existed back then. It feels like DELL and HP were the top hardware manufacturers during that time.

  • @Lontokka
    @Lontokka 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Apple in 2024: "No, it's impossible to have a computer OS on a tablet!"

  • @johngossman1497
    @johngossman1497 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Access was a database. And if your database out grew it used Visual Basic Script (which was very powerful, if a little clunky) and could ODBC into SqlServer, Oracle, etc. I automated my companies entire data production system using it.

  • @elrey7608
    @elrey7608 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hey Luke it would have been cool to review those word/excel/powerpoint pocket editions to see how far/close they are to the desktop counterparts, and if they were anywhere close, it'd definitely one-up the iPad.

  • @Professorke
    @Professorke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had I known that this existed then, I would have bought it, but here in Belgium they are always far behind with modern stuff, but with the arrival of the Internet it has improved and so you keep up with the times.

  • @f0gman75
    @f0gman75 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My cousin worked at Vadem and brought the Clio to my house that I got to borrow for a couple weeks when it was just released on the market. At the time I had a Newton MP2000 so he knew I would be interested as the PDA niche was extremely geeky. Other than the larger color screen and the nifty folding mechanism, it was inferior to the Newton mostly because of limited software capability. But to this day I still wonder about having an iPad version of the Clio with the obvious silicon improvements made over the last 20+ years.

  • @shadowace104
    @shadowace104 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i had a dell inspiron duo around 2011 and at the time i thought it was very futuristic. never thought the exact same idea existed 13 years earlier

  • @smiththers2
    @smiththers2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a laptop from 1998 with the original battery that works still, so I wouldn't be blown away if that one still works

  • @SamAlexander1
    @SamAlexander1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I worked at a hospital around 2000 and was tasked to maintain about 30 of these for our medical staff. They were nice, but they had their limits. When the batteries were totally drained they lost all data, that was the biggest catch. Also wireless didn't exist so they had to be wired by ethernet though dialip didn work well. When I went on call I took one with me and used it for a few years with a Windows CE RDP client or Citrix client to dial into network and remote into servers or apps. It was a nice drive and yes way ahead of it's time. If screen was better, fewer issues with batteries, and if wireless was a thing then maybe it would have lasted better. Amazing doe business use, not so much for consumers.

  • @JackStavris
    @JackStavris 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People seem to conveniently forget that Microsoft and their partners were in the tablet game for over 15 years before current day Apple was ever making these devices (I say current day because they did have the Newton, but it was also a failure). Between PalmTop PCs, PDAs, and even the Sega Dreamcast, Windows CE was everywhere and was the basis of Microsoft's mobile platform until Windows Phone 7.
    Even post-Windows CE there was always an effort to run regular Windows on tablets dating all the way back to Windows 3.1 which had a specific version called "Windows 3.1 for Pen Computing". Windows XP had a dedicated Tablet PC Edition as well, and starting with Windows 7, full multi-touch support was added (even though the UI wasn't suited for it). People only remember Windows 8 "copying the iPad" which was never true. Sure, they adapted regular Windows with a mobile-oriented touch UI, but as far as Microsoft's efforts in the tablet game, they've been there since day 0 in the early 1990s. It's a shame they never actually succeeded.

    • @orangeyellow-me1pz
      @orangeyellow-me1pz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They did succeed for a while. Windows Mobile controlled 42% of the market at one point. That's definitely winning.

    • @belstar1128
      @belstar1128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yea but the problem was that windows was clunky with a touch screen and they kept trying to do silly things like handwriting recognition instead of an on screen keyboard. and the screens themselves were bad there is a reason why crts were the norm untill the mid 2000s

  • @dewaynehowse231
    @dewaynehowse231 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had one. It was amazing. Very slow but awesome.

    • @RKingis
      @RKingis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Definitely one of the coolest WinCE devices around then.

  • @timr.2257
    @timr.2257 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The key thing was how much at launch? And Sharp isn't a niche company lol

    • @orangeyellow-me1pz
      @orangeyellow-me1pz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Especially back then. The kid just doesn't know.

    • @jwmcateer3284
      @jwmcateer3284 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had one of these and they weren’t cheap compared to a fully powered laptop. I think retail was $1200 and I got mine new/on sale a year or two after they came out for $800. Windows CE was a huge limitation. Basically it was a big Personal Digital Assistant. I absolutely loved the form factor though. I think it was about 3lbs with most of the weight in the hinge/battery. It’d be cool to mod an iPad mini into the screen or something. The keyboard was small but I enjoyed it. Cool to see that dug out of the ashes. I wonder how much Luke had to pay for it?

  • @KevinTumlinson
    @KevinTumlinson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Right now, among writers, there's a trend of dedicated writing machines. This would be perfect for focused writing.

  • @PaulPhillipsUK
    @PaulPhillipsUK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's one of the most impressive retro finds I've ever seen

  • @junevortexmusic7950
    @junevortexmusic7950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Waoooo. I remember this . That design was decades ahead of.

  • @saulgoodman2018
    @saulgoodman2018 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    These young kids today.
    They were other touch screen laptops in the early 2000's
    Why do young kids think that the iPad was the first tablet?

    • @breaky73
      @breaky73 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because that is what Apple likes people to think. That they are original and any other tech company doesn't matter.

  • @skisavoie
    @skisavoie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My favourite at the time was the Psion range of PDA’s. Their Symbian operating system also powered the many Nokia “smart” phones in the late 1990’s early 2000’s, before Apple blew them all away with the first iPhone. Great video, thanks.

    • @Pasi123
      @Pasi123 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Symbian was still around in the early 2010's too. Nokia 808 from 2012 was the last Symbian smartphone

  • @OmarAlKhatan
    @OmarAlKhatan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's no surprise that it's still functioning flawlessly after all these years, even amidst advancements in technology. The reason? It's Japanese craftsmanship at its finest!

  • @siting1178
    @siting1178 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nontheless, the design of this laptop looks so slick and elegant, just purely beautiful.

  • @NewtonDKC
    @NewtonDKC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh I remember that device, or rather the original,it is based on. I believe the original was called the Vadem Clio (updated: oh nostalgia, Vadem licensed their orototu]yep design. To Hsarp, so sharp was first, Vadem re-acquired the license to their design and released 2. Versions of the Clio, both 640x480…a 3 version was planned running the Handheld PC version of WinCE and would have featured upgrades to the screen 800x600 and the switch to an ARM processor! My dream! Sadly it was a dream and never made it to production. Really though, the concept is solid; if Apple could engineer a hinge on the

  • @lg.-
    @lg.- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What an excellent video, Luke! Can't believe this thing existed back in 98, way ahead of its time indeed!

  • @massimodileo7169
    @massimodileo7169 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    dear Luke, this thing failed because it was so terribly slow and under powered, with poor software support, it really didn’t make any sense at all. None would have been able to use as a laptop replacement, and it was too big for being a pc companion (like the first handheld/palmtop were meant to be). Believe I was there. Cheers.

  • @mrocob83
    @mrocob83 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To me this would have been something I'd totally get. It's design is pretty cool. I wonder how videos look playing in it. You could have used it like a tablet in the car

  • @RichardSmithers
    @RichardSmithers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had one of these. It was great - for a little while. Eventually it was really only useful for very basic word processing and playing what games you could find and that would run at a decent speed. Speed was definitely and issue. Windows CE with lack of compatible apps was another issue. Also connectivity. I remember it being finicky to sync and so very slow when it did work. It does have a PC card slot and I did find a network adaptor that helped with browsing speed. Overall, it was a great idea and design, but the hardware just wasn't quite ready yet rendering it as little more that a big PDA. This was also when Palm Pilot and Windows CE handhelds were on the market. Better supported and more portable.

  • @lovedfriend2020
    @lovedfriend2020 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW, a guy who only does Apple things doing a Windows laptop! YES! more please

  • @kendricrautomusprime
    @kendricrautomusprime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Luke you need to go back in time to 1995 and go forward from there when box computer stores were nearly everywhere you would be amazed what was coming out back then.

  • @orlevene9964
    @orlevene9964 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the hinge mechanism and the ‏flexible screen positioning

  • @j1000a
    @j1000a 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would like to see you mod this with a modern day touch screen and a Raspberry Pi stuffed inside.

  • @bricktasticanimations4834
    @bricktasticanimations4834 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is officially the coolest thing that I've seen today so far! WOW!

  • @kakegarcia8056
    @kakegarcia8056 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is interesting to see how old devices proven to really be future proof with less technology since they can operate FOREVER without needing updates and just needing batteries to fully operate and do what they were designed for, still so much to learn about what really tech is and how things can last… Bests regards from a Venezuelan follower in Panama!

  • @darryljames0111
    @darryljames0111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮 It's like a Microsoft surface studio from the 90!

  • @sas999LLJW
    @sas999LLJW 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    early version of the surface laptop studio 1/2🤫

  • @ChrisPTY507
    @ChrisPTY507 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    wow this device was waaaay ahead of its time, so future proof! I am not surprised that it failed to sell because it was way ahead of what people needed back in the late 90s.

    • @td_kdname5197
      @td_kdname5197 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was affordable too. The list price was around $899 or $999. It had a lot of RAM memory for the time at 16MB but no hard drive storage. Maybe that was why it failed to sell.

    • @belstar1128
      @belstar1128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the problem was that windows ce cant multitask or run normal windows programs and you need to get everything off cd so that would get very annoying. if it ran windows 95 it would have been better but then you still have the cd problem

  • @OctavioGaitan
    @OctavioGaitan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly, if it was x86-based and capable of running Windows 95/98/98SE, the device woulda skyrocketed in popularity.

  • @TomT-bn1lm
    @TomT-bn1lm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's mostly about timing and price. This was probably very expensive and ahead of its time. It also ran on Windows CE, which was great, but limited for compatibility to any apps on regular Windows.

  • @titianobsidian6549
    @titianobsidian6549 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    HO NO, it's 1998! You will have to cope with the millennium bug 😱 Planes will fall from the sky, cars chill crash into walls, we're all doomed! Get your survival underground shelter together and arm yourself. Good luck!

  • @neversaynever5157
    @neversaynever5157 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video i wish i had 1 of those at that time , my 1st computer was a Nokia Ngage Phone/Game Deck it took me over a year to learn all the basic features it still runs today i bought it in 2004 i still love to use it for game play when i can even though im 56 🙂👍

  • @cell718
    @cell718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There was nothing on the internet yet and no apps yet. It really was ahead of its time.

  • @whophd
    @whophd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I owned and used a Newton eMate 300, this product was the natural choice for a replacement. It would have only got me halfway to the iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard in 2018 though. I suppose the 11-inch MacBook Air could maybe fill the gap in the second decade, but it had terrible battery life compared to ARM, whether in Macs, Newtons or Windows CE.

  • @Jester5110
    @Jester5110 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After watching the other two, of your videos on the subject (first beeing from July 4th, 2015), I'd say the second one is the best produced one. It's going more deeply into the technical aspect of that device.
    But one can clearly see, how much you are personally into this little machine, considering you went to the trouble of purchasing a brand new device for your third video. :o)

  • @andrewstones2921
    @andrewstones2921 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should research the Psion MC400 from almost 10 years earlier.. that was amazing but again let down by the screen

  • @wesschmunk5783
    @wesschmunk5783 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had one of these that I bought at a yard sale. It had never been used. I was always amazed at the battery life. I had a serial to usb dongle, which made it easy to interface with a pc.

  • @underover101
    @underover101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That screen made me thought that my screen was too dark for a moment.

  • @darylcheshire1618
    @darylcheshire1618 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    reminds me of The Sleeper starring Woody Allen. He sleeps for 50 years and wakes up and eventually goes into the garage and starts the VW Beetle which starts immediately.

  • @davidsucesso2419
    @davidsucesso2419 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    your dad has good taste for technology. i have news for you apple is not the only one reinventing the wheel 😂

  • @thelthrythquezada8397
    @thelthrythquezada8397 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back when tech was fun vs today where people feel obligated to buy the "it" thing in order not to be teased in school.

  • @Xpurple
    @Xpurple 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used WinCE for years. It was rather limited, but worked fine for what it did. Granted, I mostly used mine as an eBook reader and to take notes.

  • @Lmanyakaa
    @Lmanyakaa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Access at some point was (and still is for those who didn't upgrade) almost like Visual Basic 6. I cannot believe now they provided all that custom Windows forms capabilities in it.

  • @robertmaxey5406
    @robertmaxey5406 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a technical writer. The Clio and the Tri Pad are perfect for my needs. I use an iPad, but it is actually overkill. Thirty year old tech is all I need to earn my pay.

    • @fred-youtube
      @fred-youtube 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The iPad lets you upload to the internet on modern websites, has a modern copy of Word with support for .docx, lets you use whatever BT keyboard you want, etc, so it's still better for the task.

  • @MD-01
    @MD-01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Impressive. In 1998 , I would definitely have bought it and installed chrome ASAP

  • @yebjharsevran8204
    @yebjharsevran8204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yeah "filmora translates good", then you have filmora saying "it allows you to translate your video to other videos", and "simply click on the button for learn the language"

  • @SilverSpoon_
    @SilverSpoon_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    one BIG difference,
    you can type text on it, and draw on it.
    well, i have a thinkpad X61t so... but 20 years ago i wanted a Fujitsu Stylistic.

  • @Ntyler01mil
    @Ntyler01mil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the most interesting aspect of this device is the unique way the screen is mounted to the body of the laptop.

  • @JessicaFEREM
    @JessicaFEREM 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the irony of calling anything "pocket" and having it be "handheld" edition on this behemoth of a laptop

  • @sharatwilliams
    @sharatwilliams 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “…pocket access, whatever that is…” 😂😂😂

  • @wokecults
    @wokecults 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing device. I didn't know about it.

  • @rickiehoxton
    @rickiehoxton 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “What’s access”…? Way to make me feel old!

  • @bepriceless
    @bepriceless 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You're so young. It's like you're on an archeological dig. I still use a VCR that's older than that thing. But, cool find anyway.

  • @dctaken
    @dctaken 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reminds me of a Dell Inspiron mini duo that I loved.

  • @PumpedSmartass
    @PumpedSmartass 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not gonna lie, this is pretty slick

  • @2short99
    @2short99 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could’ve been the price that made it a niche thing. These apparently ran for $899 when they first came out which is a little over $1700 today that’s double what most iPads cost.

  • @destructodisk9074
    @destructodisk9074 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I maintain the grey menu Windows versions were all great, and I would happily use them today if they could only handle the web.