Awesome video and comparison. It’s so frustrating to watch dyno videos and 99% of the time they will flash the chart up on the screen for about a half a second and it’s extremely blurry and out of focus or so far away it’s illegible. The whole reason for watching dyno videos is to see the chart clearly and understand exactly what it represents. Thank you and very nice work.
Just found your channel, awesome video. As others said, really appreciate you taking the time to share and explain dyno graph. I just got a mk7 gti and installed stage1 eqt. So this is very helpful for future mods. Stage2 vs is38
For everyone first watching this video, I will do you the favor of commenting why you are seeing lower whp and tq numbers in this video per Stage 2 IS20 and IS38. It is because they use SAE corrected numbers. Those numbers are always lower than other dyno numbers.
@@crazycomments8038 depends on what dyno you use a Mustang dyno shows lower numbers than a dynojet but on a dynojet yeah you might see that number if car had FBO's
To get the most out of is38 you really need a high pressure fuel pump to go with the rest of it, I'm running Apr intake, full milltek sports cat resonated pipe, down pipe, clutch, flywheel, race line stage 2 ECU upgrade, but I am on a 99 octane tune
I like the comparison good video. I have a 2019 GTI I have an APR IS38 high torque tune. We did 4 dyno pulls at 70 degrees fahrenheit and 100% humidity at sea level. At the crank average was 399BHP and 430FTLBS. I since added 3 inch exhaust all the way. Taking it to Road Atlanta July 11th and 12th. I'll post a video of track day.
Made 361 whp and 383 torque on the is38. 1100 DA and 83 degree weather. Elevation is 10ft above sea level here also. This is with stock fueling with 2 gallons of e85 and 93 octane. My car does have 80k miles and registered 180-184psi in all 4 cylinders and was tuned since 7k miles.
Appreciate the feedback, and yeah it's tough when all people look for are the highest numbers without understanding the actual data. But if we can help one person understand than that's a start. :)
Great videos, keep it up. Surprised to hear that you guys only get 91 octane. We, in South Africa, get 95 in the coastal areas and 93 inland so I'll stop complaining!
I was wondering if there is a way for them to lower the boost a couple #lbs in 1st and 2nd gear just to help the car walk out of the hole better. Thinking about this upgrade for my new Jetta GLI.
If you check APRs website you will see they focus on overall acceleration, including 0-60. They're not just focused on HP figures but are doing what they can to get as much power to the ground as possible on street tires.
@@COMotorsports Thank you, but I have Stage 1 I.E. and would like to keep it with them. Most cars I watch with all different sort of tunes are still spinning, overwhelming the front tires. I don't want to go buy a set of front drag radials for my car. thank you.
Have you guys done an Alltrack with an is38? I was curious of the power output and reliability. Was toying with the idea of getting an Alltrack and installing an is38, figured it should be at least golf r power. If they made a wagon golf R in the US I’d be pumped!!
It won't quite hit Golf R / GTI numbers due to the Alltrack using a 1.8 liter motor. It'll still be quick though, 352HP / 324 LB-FT at the crank are Unitronic's advertised numbers.
I went IS38 on my Gen 3 MQB 2.0T Audi a3 a little over a month ago, I did not feel any torque loss. Im with Unitronic Stage 2+ IS38 Flash and im pretty happy with it, my buddy has a similar setup and he dyno’d at 356hp and 388tq on 93 octane (which is what Im running). Great video! I love the comparison!
Thanks, it's just peak torque numbers that are generally the same or a bit lower but how much broader the torque is you'd never notice, Infact you'd think there was more because of it. Also what correction factor was your buddies car dyno graph?
I fuckin love these dyno vids, you do a great job man. I also totally love APR even tho they get a lot of hate lately for some reason? I'm mk6 k04 APR high tq so a little different, but I've driven several manufacturers' tunes on a similar setup, and APR's drivability is straight up smoother than stock most of the time.. even if they're a touch down on raw power from other tuners. I was on REVO for Stg 2 and it would just torque spike and blow the wheels off for ANY reason haha, which was kinda fun if I wanted to hop the front end like a pogo stick. But APR does a great job of managing boost in 1st and 2 so it ends up feeling faster cause it just hooks up. There's a lot of value in that.
Feels faster and generally is. There's a reason they're as big as they are. And when you're that big you're bound to have haters. Thanks for the comments.
@@COMotorsports you have no idea how long I've been looking for this answer. If I could buy you a pack of beer I would. I might suggest changing the description of this video to include information about that happening. On a lot of forms specifically talking about the APR tune and the jb4 piggyback people will try to convince others that it is directly surge itself. your video will probably get a lot more views than it already has if you knowingly answer this question in the video.
love these comparison videos, but i have a question, what if someone puts a hybrid is38 on a gti, with s3 injectors to run a high boost application with flex fuel?
@@COMotorsports is38 stock turbo vs is38 hybrid turbo on a gti. also id like to see this gti vs a stock golf 7r? it might be cheaper to get a golf gti and spend money on is38, than buying a golf 7r? www.hpamotorsports.com/hpa-is38
I know you guys are at altitude but because you are using the SAE correction factor, the numbers should be comparable to any Dynojet using the same correction factor right?
We are not at altitude, we're at sea level. In fact, I could almost chuck a rock into the ocean from the shop. Since some of these earlier videos' we've switched to STD correction as the bulk of the internet just look at numbers and nothing more. And since SAE typically displays lower we got tired of answering people that said "that's low" or "my car made X HP more".
@@COMotorsports Yea idk whats up with that. My car made numbers that are in line with these on a friend's dynojet. I've used that dyno for years and it always seems to give "low" numbers for a given car/setup compared to what the internet says. Must be a lot of inflated dynos out there or something.
Are you guys going to a lower heat range spark plugs for stage 2 GTIs and golf R? I have a mk7 golf R with a eurodyne 91oct stage 2 in Manitoba. Not much support out here
I know its not the same car, but I've got a clubsport gti, stage 2, downpipe, custom 4" intake with 101mm Bmc filter on 95ron tune, car made 267wkw on the most stingy/stiff dyno in our country and on a calibrated dyno car made 306kw
@@COMotorsports Yes. Their data is pretty accurate I wholeheartedly agree. Mk7.5 GTI APR Stage 2 - AMS IC - APR DP - APR TIP - K&N Drop-in w/Snow grate removal - RS7 Sparks gapped .024 @127ft Above Sea Level car dyno'd in at 307whp / 347wtq (Mustang) on 92Oct Pump.
Went from is12 to is20 now thinking of going this route. From a dollar to horsepower perspective is it worth it? Will I notice more of a stronger pull?
More HP yes, not much TQ. Best thing to do is go on APRs website. They have endless dynos to be able to compare each. Even if you're not running their software it's good data and your focus is on the difference between each.
Ahh okay. I have an mk6 gen3 gli apr stage 2 with other things done but have been looking for big turbo options but apr does not seem to have stage 3 for my vehicle. I have seen some jb4 on top of apr tune. Trying to figure out how it was done for future reference. Thanks a lot for the info!
@@COMotorsports because I can’t find anyone that will install APR Stage 2, what are your thoughts on Malone vs APR. I see the mk6 had some decent gains. I just bought my son a mk6 full stage 2 with Malone. Now I have the itch for my mk7
Depends on what turbo, what other mods are required to be installed at that time such as intercooler, exhaust, fueling etc, not too mention which car it's going in. Kinda like asking "how much is it to build a house". There's lots of factors to take into consideration.
My Mk7 made 273hp 289tq on a stage 1 apr tune. That car might have some issues. Did it have a trans tune when it was stage 2? Was it stage 2 with an intercooler or stage 2+?
93 octane. And not sure on the correction factor. Had it Dynoed on KC Max's portable dynojet at SCT. Which was confirmed to be running low by a couple guys that had preset hp tunes on their cars.
@@ringo_fishin SAE Correction, 91oct. The numbers are higher uncorrected or STD correction but it doesn't keep it an even playing field so we always do SAE.
Great video. I think if I had to read 1 more comment you telling people its SAE corrected, I would make it a drinking game and be passed out half way through the comments. Few questions... my '16 mk7 with PP has a few upgrades and a few on the way. No tune yet but I am torn between APR and Uni. Which would be a more safer and consistent of the 2? Also, would in your opinion going hybrid is38 as oppose to oem is38 be better? Aside intake, intercooler and DP, what other mods would you recommend... charge pipes? Oil cooler? Coil packs? Pcv/catch can?
We use quite a few tuning solutions but we've seen nothing but awesome results on these with APR. They're products never cease to impress. As for mods, stage 2, intake, downpipe and intercooler if you can do it.
@@COMotorsports I already have full apr intake, elbow, inlet pipe and down pipe. Adding AWE track exhaust and IE version 2 intercooler. BUT what I always worry about is those other support mods to make things safer and better for flow. Coming from Nissan 350z and tracking that I always worry about oil temps but seems like on GTI its an over looked mod. So wondering if its worth it?
@@COMotorsports Cool beans. I'm entirely stock with my Mk7.5 GTI manual. Thinking of future modifications, want to think through a cohesive, reliable, sensible stage2 package and have been wondering if mid 300's were possible without fancy fuel or secondary fueling.
How much would you say the cost of swapping for Is38+labor? Any recommendations? APR? Squeekytuned? Your response would be really helpful, thank you sir!
They're not. This was SAE corrected numbers which is specified in the desription. I believe this was 330whp STD correction. Also this was a DSG car which we now generally dyno in 5th. This was dynoed in 4th which tends to be lower. In 5th it would have shown more power for sure. With all that said we typically see 330-350whp on stage 2 Rs on our 91oct.
@@COMotorsports the etr is a hybrid is38 as I understand for more than 500 hp but currently I want to test it only with the stage 2 program. I know all the potential of this turbo won't be used but I don't want to break anything
Hard to beat the price of a used IS38. Also we do not have ethanol anywhere here aside from what we/others bring in for race cars. So ethanol is not an option on the regular street cars here.
@@COMotorsports Didn't consider that you guys are based in Nova Scotia, without the option of running on corn the is38 is definitely a good oem option!
Well, to do the turbo upgrade correctly you should have an upgraded downpipe and intake as well. Since those mods are required for stage 2 it only makes sense if you're stage 1 to do the upgrade to stage 2 while you save your pennies for the turbo upgrade.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +1
CO Motorsports copy that. I’m going stage 2 and APR down pipe later this month since I already have the stage 1 and intake. Before he year is over I for sure want the turbo afterwards. Thanks!
@Bryce Czirr unfortunately you're still wrong. If you look at APRs website a little further your will see that stage 2 is no longer available. That's because they no longer sell downpipes, which is the prerequisite for thier stage 2 files up until about a month ago. Now it's just not available for these vehicles. So yes stage 2 on these required a downpipe upgrade, no questions.
CO Motorsports i thought you have a clear cover over your state plate..? Maybe I’m wrong . Bc I have one over my front plate but it’s too dark and yours isn’t as much. It’s a lighter tone.
1. It's 91oct 2. It's SAEv corrected 3. It's WHP not crank HP If you've dynoed 346whp on the same fuel and correction factor please email us your dyno sheets, we'd love to see them. 😉
Like it was stated; if you dyno'd at the same location as this one on 91Oct - you'd be pushing out similar numbers. It's obvious, that using a "346" number, that you haven't dyno'd your vehicle anywhere and simply going off what a Tune File reported.
What are you talking about? When yore talking about power, you mentioned "dont look at the begining, I started dyno at diferent way", but at the same time, when youre talking about torque, you cmprare pick torque just from that begining range with the midle range of torque after turbo replacement.
@@COMotorsports according to the charts, up to 3.5 krpm is worse than before the turbo change. Especcially that this is a typical daily use rpm range. For example, there is avaiable 150 hp at 2.5k rpm before the change, vs only 100hp after the turbo change.
Stage 2 GTI... not R, there is a difference you know. It dyno's pretty much exactly as it should, on 91oct, even with the little PSA at the end of the video.
@@COMotorsports OK thanks a lot. Friend of mine ordered some part but he's selling them. I'll probably buy them. Is38 upgraded turbo. Cts 3.5 downpipe. Intercooler and a bunch of other parts.
It has to do with our fuel, and the correction factor used for these runs. Typically 7rs dyno between 320-350 on our dyno with our 91oct fuel. The higher ones all have upgraded intercoolers.
Bogdan Silyuk Yup ecs front mount, ecs intake, CTs catless downpipe, and all upgraded boostpipes. Car has room for much more on the is38 but need an upgraded high pressure fuel pump!
This is crazy I’ve got 1.8tfsi a3 2014 I got a stage 1 plus map and went from 180bhp and 250nm to 240bhp and 380nm 😂 my stage 2 got me around 330bhp and 410nm I have stock turbo it’s not even a is20 I don’t think
@@COMotorsports I’m in the uk we don’t read fly wheel power only actual whp I’ve never heard anyone quote there engine power they would just get laughed at 😂
You're not making 330 horse power at the wheels on an is20, sorry. Look at all tuning companies websites and you will see the numbers listed are crank house power, which is completely different. Email us your dyno sheet of your car making 330whp on an is20, we'd love to see it.
I’m sorry but I have had mine dyno and I’m on is20 and making 320 hp and could make more on a is38 I could make near 410-430 with the vortex xl u can make 500 plus apr is just not the way to go for tunes
You're sorry that you don't understand the difference between 91oct and SAE correction and the impact it has vs better fuels and different correction factors. Apology accepted. 👍
@@KC_GAMING-cf3fs bring your car here, let me put our 91oct in it and dyno it and site you SAE correction and I will prove you otherwise. You will see it has to do with fuel, all providers we use show similar results here or worse.
great vid. Sucks you have to justify a tune APR created lol. 91 fuel stinks. Consistency is a great factor when most look for peak #'s. Hopefully the owner can mix some Exx in there
We don't need to justify anything, fuel is what limits us on power, not the software. Whether we put APR or any of the other providers on the dyno there's only so much power to be had safely with 91oct on a stock IS38, simple as that.
CO Motorsports I think you took my comment as a knock. I was praising your work. All your comments below are about the shitty gas. That’s kinda justifying the numbers. Either was keep posting 🤘🏼
@@jpshanuson7192 Consistency is what we're after here with these comparisons. It's much hotter today then it was the day we dyno'd the one in this video and I just had another IS38 GTI on the dyno and because it's SAE correction the numbers are near identical to this one. If I change the correction factor, one shows more than the other.
Do you happen to know more about the 2015 Audi TT 8s EA888 engine? I bought the car this week and it came with an ABT stage 1 tune, 310whp 324tq and 98 fuel europe. It is way faster than a stage 1 mk7 GTI or stock R's. Whats the difference of the engine on the TT and the MK7? Also, i really want to go IS38. (AFAIK i know it has the IS20, and the ABT dyno graph is on their website)
The only way is making that power is if it had a K04 upgrade, or a TTS. The is20 and is38 turbos are for a different engine and would not fit your MK2 TT.
If you haven’t installed bigger intacooler and charge pipes really no point having is38 I’m sure you need upgraded transmission and clutch anything more than 400 from what I’ve seen on the old TH-cam master mechanics haha
@@COMotorsports I’ve got an a3 8v 1.8tfsi I done a bunch except intacooler and charge pipes and got it stage 2 and it made 0 power on dyno infect it blew a hole in my thermostat housing and now laying in a heep untill my intacooler and charge pipes and new thermostat housing arives 😂 nothing ever works out for me first time always have to learn the hard way 😅
Man, this has got to be one of the weaker Stage 2 runs I've ever seen from a VII APR file. That's usually Stage 1 wheel output from most dynos reported on forums & YT as well as days I've watched in person. Your IS38 numbers is see from Stage 2 cars. lol Not a dig at you or anything. But that's pretty hilarious. I'm actually going IS38 on mine in about a week. But switching from APR to IE.
Read into the data... you're mistaken. Please dyno your IS38 GTI with 91oct and show me the SAE corrected numbers. You will see similar results. I have dynoed a handful of 7R's on this dyno in FWD with near identical results. We give all results in SAE corrected to keep the dyno numbers comparable. I could have shown you the higher numbers by simply using a different correction factor. But if you want to compare your car to this... put 91oct in it and get results in SAE Correction factor.
@@mik55tv22 You have to remember "DA". Add another 10%whp from the graph + a few more torque and that's what the engine would produce at Sea Level (with proper Air Stream moving through the front).
@@kevondouglas4088 So how can you say we're low when you're not comparing apples to apples. Have him run the car with 91oct in it, and show us SAE corrected numbers. :)
@@kevondouglas4088 no problem at all. It's mentioned in the video, but most don't pay attention as they assume everyone has access to 93oct, so I get it. Unfortunately we do not though.
Awesome video and comparison. It’s so frustrating to watch dyno videos and 99% of the time they will flash the chart up on the screen for about a half a second and it’s extremely blurry and out of focus or so far away it’s illegible. The whole reason for watching dyno videos is to see the chart clearly and understand exactly what it represents. Thank you and very nice work.
Much appreciated, also appreciate the fact that you get it. 👍
lol for real, I hate that, I always have to pause it at exactly the right moment to see the graph.
For real he makes the presentation so on point
Just found your channel, awesome video. As others said, really appreciate you taking the time to share and explain dyno graph. I just got a mk7 gti and installed stage1 eqt. So this is very helpful for future mods. Stage2 vs is38
Appreciate it, best of luck with your project.
Excellent video. People hung up on the numbers are not seeing the big picture: @50hp gained by going to an is38.
exactly.
Thank you, I have been looking for this information for a week. Clearly I have to upgrade the Polo GTI to an IS38. 🎉
‘15 GTI is38 with United Motorsports tune over a year now. Love it! Really woke the car up.
No doubt about it.
For everyone first watching this video, I will do you the favor of commenting why you are seeing lower whp and tq numbers in this video per Stage 2 IS20 and IS38.
It is because they use SAE corrected numbers. Those numbers are always lower than other dyno numbers.
Not enough people are reading your comment first lol.
What kind of numbers should be showing? I am curious because I have the same setup.
@@crazycomments8038 with that setup it should be around 300hp and 320TQ or a lil more ive seen them as high as 350hp and 360 TQ
@@mik55tv22 APR shows 396 hp
@@crazycomments8038 depends on what dyno you use a Mustang dyno shows lower numbers than a dynojet but on a dynojet yeah you might see that number if car had FBO's
To get the most out of is38 you really need a high pressure fuel pump to go with the rest of it, I'm running Apr intake, full milltek sports cat resonated pipe, down pipe, clutch, flywheel, race line stage 2 ECU upgrade, but I am on a 99 octane tune
I like the comparison good video. I have a 2019 GTI I have an APR IS38 high torque tune. We did 4 dyno pulls at 70 degrees fahrenheit and 100% humidity at sea level. At the crank average was 399BHP and 430FTLBS. I since added 3 inch exhaust all the way. Taking it to Road Atlanta July 11th and 12th. I'll post a video of track day.
Any fueling mods? We're you running 93?
@@coreytelfer4566 no fuel mods and I only use 93.
You're dsg?
@@Bawla187 yes I have DSG.
Made 361 whp and 383 torque on the is38. 1100 DA and 83 degree weather. Elevation is 10ft above sea level here also. This is with stock fueling with 2 gallons of e85 and 93 octane. My car does have 80k miles and registered 180-184psi in all 4 cylinders and was tuned since 7k miles.
Ethanol is no where the same as 91oct, so that's not surprising.
10 ft . Hahaha . Like those are gonna make any difference.
Fabian Nova it does when da is under 1000 most of the time.
Did you run that fuel mixture on APR file or are you EQT?
jUST DOING is38 now, i appreciate the shit out of this video
Thanks!!
Love it, amazing break down
Thank you for the content.
Appreciate the love. Thanks 👍
Great content. It sucks that you have to keep explaining to people how true wheel hp is measured. Keep up the good work!
Appreciate the feedback, and yeah it's tough when all people look for are the highest numbers without understanding the actual data. But if we can help one person understand than that's a start. :)
Great videos, keep it up. Surprised to hear that you guys only get 91 octane. We, in South Africa, get 95 in the coastal areas and 93 inland so I'll stop complaining!
The octane rating is a bit different. Our 91 is your 95 Ron.
I was wondering if there is a way for them to lower the boost a couple #lbs in 1st and 2nd gear just to help the car walk out of the hole better. Thinking about this upgrade for my new Jetta GLI.
If you check APRs website you will see they focus on overall acceleration, including 0-60. They're not just focused on HP figures but are doing what they can to get as much power to the ground as possible on street tires.
@@COMotorsports Thank you, but I have Stage 1 I.E. and would like to keep it with them. Most cars I watch with all different sort of tunes are still spinning, overwhelming the front tires. I don't want to go buy a set of front drag radials for my car. thank you.
great video!! Keep them coming
Thanks, we're trying.
Have you guys done an Alltrack with an is38? I was curious of the power output and reliability. Was toying with the idea of getting an Alltrack and installing an is38, figured it should be at least golf r power. If they made a wagon golf R in the US I’d be pumped!!
Not yet, sorry.
@@COMotorsports ok no problem 😔😢😜
It won't quite hit Golf R / GTI numbers due to the Alltrack using a 1.8 liter motor. It'll still be quick though, 352HP / 324 LB-FT at the crank are Unitronic's advertised numbers.
I went IS38 on my Gen 3 MQB 2.0T Audi a3 a little over a month ago, I did not feel any torque loss. Im with Unitronic Stage 2+ IS38 Flash and im pretty happy with it, my buddy has a similar setup and he dyno’d at 356hp and 388tq on 93 octane (which is what Im running).
Great video! I love the comparison!
Thanks, it's just peak torque numbers that are generally the same or a bit lower but how much broader the torque is you'd never notice, Infact you'd think there was more because of it. Also what correction factor was your buddies car dyno graph?
What’s your mod list for the unitronic stage 2+? Recommend that over apr’s? Looking to do the same for my A3
@@itsJayru I wouldn't.
CO Motorsports and why’s that? Not worth the cost or the numbers don’t justify the gains?
@@itsJayru No No stage 2 is a wicked upgrade, we do them all the time on these things.
Good video! *Congrats!!*
great video
Appreciate it.
I'm intrigued, what does the shirt say? Love the content!
There's 3 shirts in the video.
Race More/B!tch Less.
Build it, run it, break it, fix it, repeat
V8S ARE SLO
All our t shirts of ours. :)
@@COMotorsports thanks, yes it was for the V8 one. Very cool, I'll check them out!
Nice video, so what's the best mods for MK6 GTI
All comes down to budget. But tuning it is at the top of the list.
One torque, haha! Great vid.
Just one. Lol. Thanks👍
Oh yea stoked on this
I fuckin love these dyno vids, you do a great job man. I also totally love APR even tho they get a lot of hate lately for some reason? I'm mk6 k04 APR high tq so a little different, but I've driven several manufacturers' tunes on a similar setup, and APR's drivability is straight up smoother than stock most of the time.. even if they're a touch down on raw power from other tuners.
I was on REVO for Stg 2 and it would just torque spike and blow the wheels off for ANY reason haha, which was kinda fun if I wanted to hop the front end like a pogo stick. But APR does a great job of managing boost in 1st and 2 so it ends up feeling faster cause it just hooks up. There's a lot of value in that.
Feels faster and generally is. There's a reason they're as big as they are. And when you're that big you're bound to have haters. Thanks for the comments.
Amazing Work 👍
What was that stuttering/chattering sound when you finally got a good pull in 4th?
It's the ECU controlling boost to prevent surge.
@@COMotorsports you have no idea how long I've been looking for this answer. If I could buy you a pack of beer I would. I might suggest changing the description of this video to include information about that happening. On a lot of forms specifically talking about the APR tune and the jb4 piggyback people will try to convince others that it is directly surge itself. your video will probably get a lot more views than it already has if you knowingly answer this question in the video.
@@allthemani852 we like beer and rum :)
@@allthemani852 I was told compressor surge sounds more like birds chirping. That was more of wastegate chatter IMO.
love these comparison videos, but i have a question, what if someone puts a hybrid is38 on a gti, with s3 injectors to run a high boost application with flex fuel?
What if, what exactly?
@@COMotorsports is38 stock turbo vs is38 hybrid turbo on a gti. also id like to see this gti vs a stock golf 7r? it might be cheaper to get a golf gti and spend money on is38, than buying a golf 7r?
www.hpamotorsports.com/hpa-is38
@@road_2_pow_r as mentioned in the video. The IS38 GTI with downpipe makes the same power as a stage 2 MK7R.
Road_2_Pow_R don’t forget to add insurance when u do the math, the auto insurance on the golf R was ridiculous for me, in Ny.
@@eval7952 I'm in Africa our insurance is totally different on this side. Modified Vechicles is still a grey area
I want to go is38 in my manual 17' SE🙏🏾.. Gotta save up 🤑🙏🏾
Definitely a good upgrade.
Me too man, can't wait.
How much is for that turbo
@@nephton15 not that much. Second hand $600 bucks
Very dope
I know you guys are at altitude but because you are using the SAE correction factor, the numbers should be comparable to any Dynojet using the same correction factor right?
We are not at altitude, we're at sea level. In fact, I could almost chuck a rock into the ocean from the shop. Since some of these earlier videos' we've switched to STD correction as the bulk of the internet just look at numbers and nothing more. And since SAE typically displays lower we got tired of answering people that said "that's low" or "my car made X HP more".
@@COMotorsports Yea idk whats up with that. My car made numbers that are in line with these on a friend's dynojet. I've used that dyno for years and it always seems to give "low" numbers for a given car/setup compared to what the internet says. Must be a lot of inflated dynos out there or something.
Are you guys going to a lower heat range spark plugs for stage 2 GTIs and golf R? I have a mk7 golf R with a eurodyne 91oct stage 2 in Manitoba. Not much support out here
This one we did cause the client wanted to put a new fresh set in, but typically not needed on the 91 file from what we've seen.
@@COMotorsports so you guys are using the stock plugs with the stock heat range. Just to clarify
@@nosturbo69 On most regular stage 1/2 vehicles only running 91 yes.
That thing sounds amazing.... any idea what exhaust is on it??
I don't remember sorry.
I know its not the same car, but I've got a clubsport gti, stage 2, downpipe, custom 4" intake with 101mm Bmc filter on 95ron tune, car made 267wkw on the most stingy/stiff dyno in our country and on a calibrated dyno car made 306kw
👍
What type of front splitter is that?
No clue, sorry.
I am interested to see the "Low Torque" file. The IS38 files do hold a pretty steady torque plateau on the APR side though....interesting.
Most of the data on APR's website is good for comparison.
@@COMotorsports Yes. Their data is pretty accurate I wholeheartedly agree.
Mk7.5 GTI APR Stage 2
- AMS IC
- APR DP
- APR TIP
- K&N Drop-in w/Snow grate removal
- RS7 Sparks gapped .024
@127ft Above Sea Level car dyno'd in at 307whp / 347wtq (Mustang) on 92Oct Pump.
Went from is12 to is20 now thinking of going this route. From a dollar to horsepower perspective is it worth it? Will I notice more of a stronger pull?
More HP yes, not much TQ. Best thing to do is go on APRs website. They have endless dynos to be able to compare each. Even if you're not running their software it's good data and your focus is on the difference between each.
Are you still on stage 2? Just adjusted the tune? I know on the site cts says to go stage 3 for the turbo
Proper file is on the car for the upgrades. Meaning is38 file.
Ahh okay. I have an mk6 gen3 gli apr stage 2 with other things done but have been looking for big turbo options but apr does not seem to have stage 3 for my vehicle. I have seen some jb4 on top of apr tune. Trying to figure out how it was done for future reference. Thanks a lot for the info!
@@marcuspatterson2925 the GLI is a weird bird which is why.
I have an existing APR Stage 1 tune on my mk7. Do I need to flash it back to stock before flashing a Malone Stage 2 via Tunezilla?
The answer to that is why are you switching?
@@COMotorsports because I can’t find anyone that will install APR Stage 2, what are your thoughts on Malone vs APR. I see the mk6 had some decent gains. I just bought my son a mk6 full stage 2 with Malone. Now I have the itch for my mk7
This is the exact point I'm at... do I upgrade to a is38 now
Great option for sure, but if you want more power there's other decent bolt on options as well to take you further.
Is20 left the chat... so yes is38 now 🤣
Nice dyno comparisons! How many hrs labour would a turbo swap be?
Depends on what turbo, what other mods are required to be installed at that time such as intercooler, exhaust, fueling etc, not too mention which car it's going in. Kinda like asking "how much is it to build a house". There's lots of factors to take into consideration.
@@COMotorsports Simple IS38 from IS12 in Alltrack. Nothing else.
@@Zharsergey I would highly suggest, upgraded downpipe, intercooler and intake.
My Mk7 made 273hp 289tq on a stage 1 apr tune. That car might have some issues. Did it have a trans tune when it was stage 2? Was it stage 2 with an intercooler or stage 2+?
On what fuel? And what correction factor on the dyno?
93 octane. And not sure on the correction factor. Had it Dynoed on KC Max's portable dynojet at SCT. Which was confirmed to be running low by a couple guys that had preset hp tunes on their cars.
@@ringo_fishin unlikely SAE correction, and different fuel. So not comparable at all.
@@COMotorsports what was the correction factor? I might go have it dynoed again. I haven't dynoed it after upgrading to stage 2.
@@ringo_fishin SAE Correction, 91oct. The numbers are higher uncorrected or STD correction but it doesn't keep it an even playing field so we always do SAE.
Can it possibly to upgrade on mk6 gli to iS38 or you have to upgrade other parts as well
Not so cut and dry but possible. You just need a lot more stuff.
Great video. I think if I had to read 1 more comment you telling people its SAE corrected, I would make it a drinking game and be passed out half way through the comments.
Few questions... my '16 mk7 with PP has a few upgrades and a few on the way. No tune yet but I am torn between APR and Uni. Which would be a more safer and consistent of the 2? Also, would in your opinion going hybrid is38 as oppose to oem is38 be better?
Aside intake, intercooler and DP, what other mods would you recommend... charge pipes? Oil cooler? Coil packs? Pcv/catch can?
We use quite a few tuning solutions but we've seen nothing but awesome results on these with APR. They're products never cease to impress. As for mods, stage 2, intake, downpipe and intercooler if you can do it.
@@COMotorsports I already have full apr intake, elbow, inlet pipe and down pipe. Adding AWE track exhaust and IE version 2 intercooler. BUT what I always worry about is those other support mods to make things safer and better for flow.
Coming from Nissan 350z and tracking that I always worry about oil temps but seems like on GTI its an over looked mod. So wondering if its worth it?
Anyone have any good thoughts on mambatek turbos?
Wonder if it's possible to make 350 wheel HP on 91 octane with the best hardware and tune....
We've made 350whp on Rs (stock turbo) on 91oct. So possible.
@@COMotorsports Cool beans. I'm entirely stock with my Mk7.5 GTI manual. Thinking of future modifications, want to think through a cohesive, reliable, sensible stage2 package and have been wondering if mid 300's were possible without fancy fuel or secondary fueling.
@@exothermal.sprocket with an R turbo yes it's possible.
@@COMotorsports So basically:
Upgraded intake
Upgraded IC
IS38
Downpipe, high flow cat
Catback exhaust
Tune
Catch canister
Supporting clutch/brakes/fluids/plugs
How much would you say the cost of swapping for Is38+labor? Any recommendations? APR? Squeekytuned? Your response would be really helpful, thank you sir!
Never even heard of squeaky tuned so that should tell you something. APR or UM would by my go to.
@@COMotorsports he meant sneekytuned and EQT is becoming the go to instead of APR
@@priscillatrujillo5189 there's always gonna be a new flavor of the week. There's only so much power to be had out of a turbo (whichever that is).
What spark plugs Shoukd i use with my apr 2 is38 on my gti
They're listed on APRs website.
Why are the numbers so low compared to others?
They're not. This was SAE corrected numbers which is specified in the desription. I believe this was 330whp STD correction. Also this was a DSG car which we now generally dyno in 5th. This was dynoed in 4th which tends to be lower. In 5th it would have shown more power for sure. With all that said we typically see 330-350whp on stage 2 Rs on our 91oct.
what a good video. nice
Thanks
Does DSG need a tune when you go stage 3?
Yes
Great Video, my IS38 setup runs slower than my IS20 low output setup.😔 If only all service providers check the cars before they send it out.
Thanks 👍
Currently I have revo stage 2 with is20, is there a problem if I replace this turbo with revo etr turbo maintaining the same program?
I don't know anything about Revo turbos. But rule of thumb is software should match hardware.
@@COMotorsports the etr is a hybrid is38 as I understand for more than 500 hp but currently I want to test it only with the stage 2 program. I know all the potential of this turbo won't be used but I don't want to break anything
@@aldoalberto1609 why risk it? Makes no sense
Sweet ride
Highly recommend going straight hybrid vs going is38 if you are stage 2 already. Going e30 on stage 2 is a better value than just a pump is38 setup.
Hard to beat the price of a used IS38. Also we do not have ethanol anywhere here aside from what we/others bring in for race cars. So ethanol is not an option on the regular street cars here.
@@COMotorsports Didn't consider that you guys are based in Nova Scotia, without the option of running on corn the is38 is definitely a good oem option!
Just curious? Do you know the whp/tq numbers on stg 2 e30 mk7 gti? I have that set up on an audi a3 8v but haven't hit the dyno yet.
@@ogpunkbuster Should be similar to is38 on pump gas. 350+ whp
@@afknoob123 nice!! Thanks for the info
So is it recommended to go full stage 2 first before upgrading the turbo, or is stage 2 not necessary?
Well, to do the turbo upgrade correctly you should have an upgraded downpipe and intake as well. Since those mods are required for stage 2 it only makes sense if you're stage 1 to do the upgrade to stage 2 while you save your pennies for the turbo upgrade.
CO Motorsports copy that. I’m going stage 2 and APR down pipe later this month since I already have the stage 1 and intake. Before he year is over I for sure want the turbo afterwards. Thanks!
@ no problem, good luck with your project.
@Bryce Czirr thanks man, we've only been an APR dealer for 13 years. For their software it was required, no false info here.
@Bryce Czirr unfortunately you're still wrong. If you look at APRs website a little further your will see that stage 2 is no longer available. That's because they no longer sell downpipes, which is the prerequisite for thier stage 2 files up until about a month ago. Now it's just not available for these vehicles. So yes stage 2 on these required a downpipe upgrade, no questions.
Hey where did you purchase your plate cover?
Not sure what you mean. We're not required to run a front plate in this province. So there's nothing at all.
CO Motorsports i thought you have a clear cover over your state plate..? Maybe I’m wrong . Bc I have one over my front plate but it’s too dark and yours isn’t as much. It’s a lighter tone.
@@christiancastro8635 We have no plates on the front of our vehicles, meaning there's no cover or anything. Just fresh untouched bumper. :)
@@COMotorsports he’s speaking of the clear cover over your rear plate.
@@corbin4258 No idea where it's from sorry.
How is this stage 2 and only 273hp?
Mine has 346 with stage 2, full milltek and an intake??
1. It's 91oct
2. It's SAEv corrected
3. It's WHP not crank HP
If you've dynoed 346whp on the same fuel and correction factor please email us your dyno sheets, we'd love to see them. 😉
Like it was stated; if you dyno'd at the same location as this one on 91Oct - you'd be pushing out similar numbers.
It's obvious, that using a "346" number, that you haven't dyno'd your vehicle anywhere and simply going off what a Tune File reported.
I'm finding that hard to believe.
Awesome , would be great if you could do a 95 ron map comparison too
We do not have here.
I believe 91 octane is the equivalent of 95ron based on APR's website
@@jclepe1754 correct
What are you talking about? When yore talking about power, you mentioned "dont look at the begining, I started dyno at diferent way", but at the same time, when youre talking about torque, you cmprare pick torque just from that begining range with the midle range of torque after turbo replacement.
Basically the point is no one starts a race or pull on the highway in 4th gear starting at 2000rpm in a dyno run isn't really comparable.
@@COMotorsports according to the charts, up to 3.5 krpm is worse than before the turbo change. Especcially that this is a typical daily use rpm range. For example, there is avaiable 150 hp at 2.5k rpm before the change, vs only 100hp after the turbo change.
@@rsmiech6691 have you never seen a lager turbo upgrade before?
@@COMotorsports it was the first time I saw such cheated charts and the use of dyno.
@@rsmiech6691 what the heck are you talking about?
That’s so strange, Stage 2 making less power than Stage 1? Idk if it’s your dyno, but that doesn’t seem right
Stage 2 GTI... not R, there is a difference you know. It dyno's pretty much exactly as it should, on 91oct, even with the little PSA at the end of the video.
Where are you guys located?
East coast Canada
What does SAE correction mean?
Google "SAE Correction Factor"
what front lip is that
Ebay or something, nothing special.
Does is38 have a different size for downpipe or uses the same size downpipe as gti turbo?
Same size.
@@COMotorsports OK thanks a lot. Friend of mine ordered some part but he's selling them. I'll probably buy them. Is38 upgraded turbo. Cts 3.5 downpipe. Intercooler and a bunch of other parts.
@@M-28xD you'll definitely enjoy.
how only make 320 on is38 when mk7 stage 2 they go over 300
It has to do with our fuel, and the correction factor used for these runs. Typically 7rs dyno between 320-350 on our dyno with our 91oct fuel. The higher ones all have upgraded intercoolers.
Decent numbers for 91 octane💪. Could definitely benefit from a UM tune 🤔
nsf VW how so....
@@tuduvuca besides more power theres also the adjustable launch control and supports other mods like fueling, and other turbos
nsf VW their website shows about the same numbers at apr O_o apr supports bigger turbo and fueling O_o
@@tuduvuca 😂
@@tuduvuca APR isn’t that good. Pretty slow if you ask me. UM is a different animal, plus they have a flex fuel tune on top of that
Will this void my warranty?
depends what kind of warranty you have.
Wut year this car
Not 100% sure but they made the Mk7 GTI platform from 2015+ here in Canada.
I wonder how much it would be on 93 octane
Unfortunately we don't get 93oct here.
@@COMotorsports can you add some E85 in there?
93 would be around 400 whp, have a mk7 gti with eurodyne is38 made 398 whp on a mustang dyno!
noli biza upgraded intercooler?
Bogdan Silyuk Yup ecs front mount, ecs intake, CTs catless downpipe, and all upgraded boostpipes. Car has room for much more on the is38 but need an upgraded high pressure fuel pump!
Is this oe is38 ?
Came factory with is20. This is Golf R is38.
This is crazy I’ve got 1.8tfsi a3 2014 I got a stage 1 plus map and went from 180bhp and 250nm to 240bhp and 380nm 😂 my stage 2 got me around 330bhp and 410nm I have stock turbo it’s not even a is20 I don’t think
Whp is different then bhp.
@@COMotorsports I’m in the uk we don’t read fly wheel power only actual whp I’ve never heard anyone quote there engine power they would just get laughed at 😂
so you have 330whp on a 1.8 tfsi with stage 2😂😂 maybe after 6 beers @@gazza8596
Nice video, can i email you guys my dyno sheet? Thanks.
Of course.
@@COMotorsports Sorry, what is your guys email?
@@2saucymk7.5 it's on our website, but you can send it to dave(at)comotorsports.ca
@@COMotorsports Thank you
MPI?
Not needed for this.
Great video, the numbers are weak sadly! I run about 330 on my Is20 with Uni S2. Even on their website Uni runs IS38 @ 380 WHP. Cool video tho :)
You're not making 330 horse power at the wheels on an is20, sorry. Look at all tuning companies websites and you will see the numbers listed are crank house power, which is completely different. Email us your dyno sheet of your car making 330whp on an is20, we'd love to see it.
CO Motorsports well actually you can make 380whp on an is20, but running full e85 😉 and over 400whp on is38 on e85
2:09 probably hit the kick down pedal
No probably's about it. :)
I’m sorry but I have had mine dyno and I’m on is20 and making 320 hp and could make more on a is38 I could make near 410-430 with the vortex xl u can make 500 plus apr is just not the way to go for tunes
You're sorry that you don't understand the difference between 91oct and SAE correction and the impact it has vs better fuels and different correction factors. Apology accepted. 👍
CO Motorsports no I understand apr is trash 🙄 all I gotta say
@@KC_GAMING-cf3fs bring your car here, let me put our 91oct in it and dyno it and site you SAE correction and I will prove you otherwise. You will see it has to do with fuel, all providers we use show similar results here or worse.
@@KC_GAMING-cf3fs Do you feel better now? If you PUFF your chest out further, you're definitely on your way to being the better man.
Dang so those advertised hp gains of 93hp off a stage 1 tune for a gti were p much lies then :(
The numbers are on par. These are whp numbers on 91oct, SAE corrected.
@@COMotorsports thats quite a bit of parasitic loss to the transmission sheesh
@@poyo3582 the numbers all equal out, based on the fuel, and correction factor.
Why are these numbers extremely low
They're not... read the comments.
Y’all need a maestro 7 license.
We're a Eurodyne dealer for many years. You will see other videos on our channel where we use Measto on plenty of vehicles.
great vid. Sucks you have to justify a tune APR created lol. 91 fuel stinks. Consistency is a great factor when most look for peak #'s. Hopefully the owner can mix some Exx in there
We don't need to justify anything, fuel is what limits us on power, not the software. Whether we put APR or any of the other providers on the dyno there's only so much power to be had safely with 91oct on a stock IS38, simple as that.
CO Motorsports I think you took my comment as a knock. I was praising your work. All your comments below are about the shitty gas. That’s kinda justifying the numbers. Either was keep posting 🤘🏼
@@jpshanuson7192 Lol, sorry man too many dyno professionals in the comments. Thanks for comments.
CO Motorsports all good brother. Everyone always wants to see peak #’s to brag. I’ll take reliability over that.
@@jpshanuson7192 Consistency is what we're after here with these comparisons. It's much hotter today then it was the day we dyno'd the one in this video and I just had another IS38 GTI on the dyno and because it's SAE correction the numbers are near identical to this one. If I change the correction factor, one shows more than the other.
mmh that's odd cause i have a jb4 and downpipe and i pulling around 300/310whp
Not really that odd, I find that jb4 definitely doesn’t offer an as aggressive of a tune compared to Uni/Apr/IE
What correction factor, what fuel? Those two things will make a huge difference. Also what turbo are you referring too? IS20 or IS38.
@@DAlexander96E yeah but mine's more agressive thats what weird...
@@COMotorsports im is20 yours should be around 330whp at least... Im using 94aki and boosting 25psi (vaccum) at my peak so 7 more than stock..
@@COMotorsports and with the is38 idk honestly but i think you should be way higher... Like 400 or close
Do you happen to know more about the 2015 Audi TT 8s EA888 engine? I bought the car this week and it came with an ABT stage 1 tune, 310whp 324tq and 98 fuel europe. It is way faster than a stage 1 mk7 GTI or stock R's. Whats the difference of the engine on the TT and the MK7? Also, i really want to go IS38. (AFAIK i know it has the IS20, and the ABT dyno graph is on their website)
The only way is making that power is if it had a K04 upgrade, or a TTS. The is20 and is38 turbos are for a different engine and would not fit your MK2 TT.
@@COMotorsports well, its a 8s, and not MK2. It's a MK3 (newest model, it has the virtual cockpit etc)
@@VuBeClan ah MK3. Makes more sense. 👍
@@COMotorsports Do you happen to have any experience with REVO? They claim their Stage 2 tune can bring the car's 0-60 to 3.9/4.0 seconds
@@VuBeClan my experience with Revo has been very little.
If you haven’t installed bigger intacooler and charge pipes really no point having is38 I’m sure you need upgraded transmission and clutch anything more than 400 from what I’ve seen on the old TH-cam master mechanics haha
100% intercooler is recommended. Why dyno these all the time intercooler makes a difference even on stock turbo.
@@COMotorsports I’ve got an a3 8v 1.8tfsi I done a bunch except intacooler and charge pipes and got it stage 2 and it made 0 power on dyno infect it blew a hole in my thermostat housing and now laying in a heep untill my intacooler and charge pipes and new thermostat housing arives 😂 nothing ever works out for me first time always have to learn the hard way 😅
My stage 2 is20 is 357bhp 412 nm so I'm kinda disappointed for you for stage 3
Cool, but what fuel are you referring too what correction factor and dyno. You're leaving out the key things that significant change those numbers.
Bhp is completely different from whp... your probably in the same range as him or lower
@@ezekielmartinez2789 yes completely different.
That is whp
That's an E30 tune - do you read?
Man, this has got to be one of the weaker Stage 2 runs I've ever seen from a VII APR file. That's usually Stage 1 wheel output from most dynos reported on forums & YT as well as days I've watched in person.
Your IS38 numbers is see from Stage 2 cars. lol
Not a dig at you or anything. But that's pretty hilarious. I'm actually going IS38 on mine in about a week. But switching from APR to IE.
Read into the data... you're mistaken. Please dyno your IS38 GTI with 91oct and show me the SAE corrected numbers. You will see similar results. I have dynoed a handful of 7R's on this dyno in FWD with near identical results. We give all results in SAE corrected to keep the dyno numbers comparable. I could have shown you the higher numbers by simply using a different correction factor. But if you want to compare your car to this... put 91oct in it and get results in SAE Correction factor.
@@COMotorsports yeah I believe he's thinking of a 93 octane file.... Got to love them huh 😂
Those are low numbers for that setup especially with the DSG which usually posts up higher numbers
No
@@COMotorsports ok buddy lol
@@mik55tv22 how many mk7 GTIs have you dynoed? How many have you dynoed with 91oct?
@@mik55tv22 You have to remember "DA". Add another 10%whp from the graph + a few more torque and that's what the engine would produce at Sea Level (with proper Air Stream moving through the front).
You will beat golf R beacause the gti is 300kg lighter a proper FWD hot hatch
Revo stage 1 with is20 turbo make 305-315hp
Not on 91oct it didn't.
@@COMotorsports in Croatia is only written 95 oct on the fuel station😂😂😂
Our 95 is maybe your 91
My 16' APR is38 map is
343WHP
379'#TQ
Cool, but you left out what fuel, and what correction factor your dyno graph was in.
GOLT FOREVER A NEVER
MEJOR MK-6
LOL user error
My friend has the same car he made 306whp and 388ft on the stock is20 stage 2 your alittle low
Lol. Did he make it on 91oct and SAE corrected? Which is why the difference.
@@COMotorsports he is on 93
@@kevondouglas4088 So how can you say we're low when you're not comparing apples to apples. Have him run the car with 91oct in it, and show us SAE corrected numbers. :)
@@COMotorsports i dont mean anything by it just wondering why it was so low but i didn't know u was on 91 so I'll take that back
@@kevondouglas4088 no problem at all. It's mentioned in the video, but most don't pay attention as they assume everyone has access to 93oct, so I get it. Unfortunately we do not though.
Go pro stop recording
My gti is stage 1 and i have 330 whp 😛
Which octane fuel and correction factor?
Is38 should be at least 360whp. Apr is weak lol
You clearly are missing some things.
APR Eww Gross