"1st woman lead Star Trek-production"? Ehm what abaout Star Trek Voyager? It`s been whole series with a women lead starship, from the beginning, to the end
People tend to forget history when they try to force a narrative they want. Personally I can care less who leads it just make a good movie with a great story and visuals.
It also says the trailer "will change Star Trek FOREVER!". I get the feeling this isn't actually in the video either. I'm getting so tired of clickbait videos, I'm starting to not watch TH-cam videos like I used to because almost every video title turns out to be a lie.
And Georgiou can't have Kirk as her role model, since she is older. I would in that way say that Kirk had Georgiou as his role model, however, it was more Pike.
As a lifelong Star Trek fan, I can say with absolute certainty that I don't give two shits about a Section 31 movie or TV show, and I doubt that there are many Trekkies that do. Nu Trek completely botched the entire premise of what Section 31 is. It is supposed to be a top secret, clandestine organization that works in the shadows, where only a very few people even know of its existence. They DO NOT have their own combadges, uniforms, super powerful ships, or even a headquarters, hence the super-secret clandestine part.
My personal problem is that 31 was supposed to be an evil whose necessity was up to debate. In DS9 they were almost always the antagonist, sure some of their plots gave the federation an advantage against the Romulans, but they also resorted to bio terrorism and genocide the moment the federation was threatened and it was ultimately Bashir stealing their anti dote that made a peacefull solution possible which they didn't even consider.
Sadly, Star Trek was changed forever when Kurtzman's Secret Hideout was given control of the franchise - and this change was not for the better - were now left with mindless action and stories written by people who consistently display their complete lack of understanding of what Star Trek is supposed to be about - but hey, enough explosions, mindless action sequences, add crying & hugging Starfleet crews and completely nonsensical storylines; maybe nobody will notice! R.I.P. quality Star Trek - something wonderful destroyed by ignorance and greed.
Kate Mulgrew's character Kathrin Janeway WAS the first female Captain both on TV series and on movies (she made a special appearance in one of TNG's movies). But it's true that Michelle Yeoh was one of the only good "things" on Star Trek Discovery and I'll be happy to see her again as Captain Giorgiou. I just hope she's not coming back along with Michael Burnham.
Section 31 ( dont care really ) Discovery S4 ( dont care really ) Starfleet Academy ( dont care ) ** Please make STAR TREK LEGACY **** Terry Matalas the only guy whos made good STAR TREK in 20 years
Yeah..., right. I'll believe it when I see it. Face it, the "NuTrek" shows are NOT "financial blockbusters". As an example, almost 7 years after the debut of "Star Trek: Discover", Paramount STILL hasn't released ANY ratings or viewer ship numbers for that show, which is NEVER a good sign. Additionally, the merchandise is NOT moving. So Section 31 allegedly being in "pre production" means NOTHING.
It would also be interesting to have a plot line where section 31 both exists and does not exist both simultaneously but it is held together somehow by a time paradox loop that must remain intact in order to better protect the timeline so that section 31 can continue to defeat any possible enemy that would threaten not only the timeline but also the universe.
It began as a series. But thinking about a Georgiou-led series, so much had to be re-worked after The Guardian of Forever (Carl) sent her back in time to before the Prime/Terran universes split. Didn't make sense for a series. A movie gave them more options & a definitive end.
@@easyalpha1 so you are saying that there are no other Section 31 people because of their are than your observation is incorrect, Janeway was definitely the lead of that show just like the commanders of every other Star Trek series were even Discovery where Michael was de facto commander from the start
@@chrissegee Nope,I am saying since this is a movie,Michelle's character will be the focus,much like Tom Cruise plays the focus on Mission impossible movies.
@@robertmartinjr.4537 S31 won't be about glorious bright space ships flying around the galaxy....more like black stealth ships doing special ops...eliminating threats....😂
The problems of politics regarding supporting/financing of Ukraine/NATO/EU, Israel, and China could be developed as interesting takes in Section 31 plots similar to what takes Star Treks of old made of world issues of their times.
I'm not enthusiastic for the Section 31 as a movie or series because I see them as a plot device or morally grey concept to be used in contrast /as a mirror for the mainstream Federation citizens and Starfleet members.
Yup. Daniels swept him away and replaced him with a replicated “dead” replacement making him an excellent operative and expert on 23rd century dynamics.
She has an awesome character. Massively complex with huge potential from an acting perspective. I am a sociopath because the universe needs me to be a socipath, not because I wanted to be a sociapath. lol Just one correction: 1st woman-lead Star Trek Production MOVIE. 😉
This is one series I've been waiting for..i don't have a problem with a woman lead, if there ever was a more diverse organization, its section 31. Made up from all groups of the federation. Cant keep a federation running, without a black ops group. Hopefully it is written by people who get star trek, not to write their stories
I need to ask a question, what rank would a section 31 officer have in the federation as a star fleet officer ! . And do you join section 31 or are you picked, offered a invitation to become part of this secretive organisation. And what happens to your private life when you are in.
As shown so far 1. A created persona of appropriate rank, or ambasador/civilian position per asignment. Outside of a mission its non a equivilant like off assigmnent a cia operator is under the gaurd duty army private, but may in situ be able to order a general. 2.You are recruited. 3. You are either ghosted or have a cover life with the org having a close eye on any known relations. It is very much a cia/mi6/kgb ect. Equivalent/anolog. Though i suspect the new show, now tv movie will lean closer to a MiB type thing.
"Executive producer Alex Kurtzman" yeah , after that phrase alone all interest dropped 300%. They literally took one of the only concepts in Trek that was unexplained yet there all the time and turned it into a "how the hell are they a secret organization that doesn't care about secrecy, competency or doing something useful" So sad
Gene Roddenberry would be turning in his grave if he knew about this - as it goes against every concept he had of what Star Trek was about.. having said this I for one am looking forward to see if they screw it up or not....
Is star trek a utopia or does someone want to put a big tear in it? My humble opinion, there is plenty to bump heads with and not blow Cannon out the airlock ... 🖖
She still so athletic for her age. I remember seeing her earlier kung fu movies as a Wing Chun Tofu kung fu girl and as co star with Stephen Chow as Court courtesan.
Isn't Paramount/CBS up for sale? Not that this will make Paramount+ profitable. BTW, how is this going to change Star Trek forever? I mean, Section 31 isn't new. And as others have said, first woman-led Star Trek production? Is anyone else as tired about this 'we did it first' news only to be proven wrong seconds later as I am?
Im glad star trek is expanding Into other character advancemnts ty the show is becoming more realistic. Hopeful. Stargate gave startrek a good rate ting whipping back in the day. Thy have learned from tht tytyty
Shhhhhhh remember in Picard Section 31 had Kirk's data in their secret warehouse? You should remember that scene. Cause you're about to get a MAJOR surprise in Section 31 movie!! shhhhhh. I was not here. I did not say this. ;)
No it's in the Prime Universe where her Prime Counter part Captain Georgio was killed because of Burnham, but later on in the series Burnham saves the Terran Universe Georgio last minute and brings her to the Prime Universe where she takes the place of her former Prime counterpart.
@@derrickgoode5434yes. Terran Imperator Gerorgio had an change of heart, because she really love Burnham and that's why she is ally of the Federation. But in her own Way. Best candidate for Section 31
I never like Discovery because it is too far off Roddenbery's Star Trek visión. This new Michele Yeo might just go the same way. A chop-socky ST? I don't think so.
Sigh. Can Paramount make one fing decent Star Trek production? We had to wait for season 3 of Picard for something good and the had to fight for that. Its all crap lately top to bottom.
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.213 | กรีน อัษฎาพร | 3 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3KrlLbCsadI/mqdefault.jpg)
"1st woman lead Star Trek-production"? Ehm what abaout Star Trek Voyager? It`s been whole series with a women lead starship, from the beginning, to the end
People tend to forget history when they try to force a narrative they want. Personally I can care less who leads it just make a good movie with a great story and visuals.
Or Disco! Please, videographers, pay attention.
Wow.
Voyager was a ensemble... S31 is focused on Yeoh.
@@easyalpha1 So literally Doscovery, but Asian.
Star Trek Voyager was the 1st woman lead Star Trek show.
I think the narrator meant star trek movie with a female lead.
I understood they meant lead as a female producer. ...was there already a female director in Star Trek?
This takes place before Voyager in the timeline.
@@jtasakornshe isnt the director, she may be a producer and there have been several female producers
@@chrissegee The context was in Star Trek, she is going to be a 1st female producer.
Wasn't Kate Mulgrew the first woman to lead a ST franchise production?
Kate led a ensemble group. Yeoh is the focus of the movie’s story.
@@easyalpha1 "Put a chick in it and make her gay!"---Cartman
@@easyalpha1key word being led, she was the lead of that show.
@@sigmamale6128She was the skipper of the ship…
Like the skipper in Giligans Island..with a great ensemble cast.
Clickbait... no trailer.
Thank you!
Yes, thank you.
It also says the trailer "will change Star Trek FOREVER!". I get the feeling this isn't actually in the video either. I'm getting so tired of clickbait videos, I'm starting to not watch TH-cam videos like I used to because almost every video title turns out to be a lie.
It's probably for the best under the circumstances...
So…you lied about there being a trailer? Click bait. Got it.
They’re determined to turn Star Trek into a dystopia 🥺
So.... trailer??? or just cuts from discovery and the promo poster that everyone has already seen....
misleading... fail..
Clickbait trash
And Georgiou can't have Kirk as her role model, since she is older. I would in that way say that Kirk had Georgiou as his role model, however, it was more Pike.
Also take in her Original Background. She is way more Badass as Kirk
Thank you Ms. Yeoh for keeping your promise. Love her.
As a lifelong Star Trek fan, I can say with absolute certainty that I don't give two shits about a Section 31 movie or TV show, and I doubt that there are many Trekkies that do. Nu Trek completely botched the entire premise of what Section 31 is. It is supposed to be a top secret, clandestine organization that works in the shadows, where only a very few people even know of its existence. They DO NOT have their own combadges, uniforms, super powerful ships, or even a headquarters, hence the super-secret clandestine part.
My personal problem is that 31 was supposed to be an evil whose necessity was up to debate. In DS9 they were almost always the antagonist, sure some of their plots gave the federation an advantage against the Romulans, but they also resorted to bio terrorism and genocide the moment the federation was threatened and it was ultimately Bashir stealing their anti dote that made a peacefull solution possible which they didn't even consider.
Sadly, Star Trek was changed forever when Kurtzman's Secret Hideout was given control of the franchise - and this change was not for the better - were now left with mindless action and stories written by people who consistently display their complete lack of understanding of what Star Trek is supposed to be about - but hey, enough explosions, mindless action sequences, add crying & hugging Starfleet crews and completely nonsensical storylines; maybe nobody will notice!
R.I.P. quality Star Trek - something wonderful destroyed by ignorance and greed.
"Her role model James T. Kirk" the Emperor's role model is a LT. she's never met
The first woman led Star Trek? Never heard of Voyager? And the show she literally came from was a woman led show.
Leading is one thing, Being the focus is diffrent.
Kate Mulgrew's character Kathrin Janeway WAS the first female Captain both on TV series and on movies (she made a special appearance in one of TNG's movies). But it's true that Michelle Yeoh was one of the only good "things" on Star Trek Discovery and I'll be happy to see her again as Captain Giorgiou. I just hope she's not coming back along with Michael Burnham.
Star Treks first Woman lead project....... erm Voyager ?
Section 31 ( dont care really ) Discovery S4 ( dont care really ) Starfleet Academy ( dont care ) ** Please make STAR TREK LEGACY **** Terry Matalas the only guy whos made good STAR TREK in 20 years
Not a trailer. it's just clickbait. very disappointed.
Who wrote this? the amount of things it gets wrong is embarrassing for a trek channel.
Figure out how to have William Shatner in it and i’ll support it
First Star Trek woman led show? So we are ignoring Star Trek Voyager are we?
This movie is focusing only on Yeoh and Georguio character.
I would rather have as a series...Too much to cram into a move!!!
The most interesting stuff in space utopia was always in contact, and especially special circumstances.
Clickbait title. No actual trailer.
Yeah..., right. I'll believe it when I see it. Face it, the "NuTrek" shows are NOT "financial blockbusters". As an example, almost 7 years after the debut of "Star Trek: Discover", Paramount STILL hasn't released ANY ratings or viewer ship numbers for that show, which is NEVER a good sign. Additionally, the merchandise is NOT moving. So Section 31 allegedly being in "pre production" means NOTHING.
It should be a solid production. Excellent actors, let's hope the writers did their part. Star Trek keeps getting better!
It would also be interesting to have a plot line where section 31 both exists and does not exist both simultaneously but it is held together somehow by a time paradox loop that must remain intact in order to better protect the timeline so that section 31 can continue to defeat any possible enemy that would threaten not only the timeline but also the universe.
How? Do we get TWO Michael Burnhams? Is Spock a girl now? Or (now I´m reachin far) will we get proper Star Trek stories at last?
I thought it was a Series!!!
Originally it was going to be. But then they changed it to a Movie. Probably because they're coming out with Star Trek: Academy as a TV Show.
Decided to make it a movie instead.
It began as a series. But thinking about a Georgiou-led series, so much had to be re-worked after The Guardian of Forever (Carl) sent her back in time to before the Prime/Terran universes split. Didn't make sense for a series. A movie gave them more options & a definitive end.
What is the exact timeline for the Section 31 movie?
No exact timeline. Filming hasn't even started yet. Check IMDb for status.
Ummm Captain Janeway was the first female lead…….
Georgiou is the story, Janeway was a captain but not the story.
@@easyalpha1 so you are saying that there are no other Section 31 people because of their are than your observation is incorrect, Janeway was definitely the lead of that show just like the commanders of every other Star Trek series were even Discovery where Michael was de facto commander from the start
@@easyalpha1section 31 won't come close to the legacy that Voyager has in Star Trek lore😂
@@chrissegee Nope,I am saying since this is a movie,Michelle's character will be the focus,much like Tom Cruise plays the focus on Mission impossible movies.
@@robertmartinjr.4537 S31 won't be about glorious bright space ships flying around the galaxy....more like black stealth ships doing special ops...eliminating threats....😂
The problems of politics regarding supporting/financing of Ukraine/NATO/EU, Israel, and China could be developed as interesting takes in Section 31 plots similar to what takes Star Treks of old made of world issues of their times.
I'm not enthusiastic for the Section 31 as a movie or series because I see them as a plot device or morally grey concept to be used in contrast /as a mirror for the mainstream Federation citizens and Starfleet members.
Please. We need Trip Tucker's story retconned as part of this.
No one ever needs retcon… retcon is just lazy writing.
Yup. Daniels swept him away and replaced him with a replicated “dead” replacement making him an excellent operative and expert on 23rd century dynamics.
Leave Trip as "dead". Make his sacrifice to mean something. Its already a 'joke' that people don't stay dead in the STU.
I'm looking forward to seeing Section 31. It should be good.
Modern SF does dark well, so certainly has potential. Can imagine it will have things that contradict “lore” which may bother some people (not me).
Perhaps, perhaps not
@@Scottlp2and exactly what does San Francisco, and Data's brother Lore have to do with any of this ?
Let the competition commence!!
Your challenge… to share nothing of any value, whilst talking continuously for a maximum of 10 mins.
GO!
Trailer? Where? Click Bait Title is not appreciated. Not subscribed and won't!
She has an awesome character. Massively complex with huge potential from an acting perspective. I am a sociopath because the universe needs me to be a socipath, not because I wanted to be a sociapath. lol
Just one correction: 1st woman-lead Star Trek Production MOVIE. 😉
This is one series I've been waiting for..i don't have a problem with a woman lead, if there ever was a more diverse organization, its section 31. Made up from all groups of the federation. Cant keep a federation running, without a black ops group. Hopefully it is written by people who get star trek, not to write their stories
Thank you Chris for your approval on a woman lead 😂
I need to ask a question, what rank would a section 31 officer have in the federation as a star fleet officer ! . And do you join section 31 or are you picked, offered a invitation to become part of this secretive organisation. And what happens to your private life when you are in.
As shown so far 1. A created persona of appropriate rank, or ambasador/civilian position per asignment. Outside of a mission its non a equivilant like off assigmnent a cia operator is under the gaurd duty army private, but may in situ be able to order a general. 2.You are recruited. 3. You are either ghosted or have a cover life with the org having a close eye on any known relations.
It is very much a cia/mi6/kgb ect. Equivalent/anolog. Though i suspect the new show, now tv movie will lean closer to a MiB type thing.
Bashir and O'Brian know first hand, they almost got stuck in Sloan's mind
It should be a series ❤
It would be awesome if William Sadler could reprise his section 31 role from Deep Space Nine in a time paradox loop.
"Executive producer Alex Kurtzman" yeah , after that phrase alone all interest dropped 300%. They literally took one of the only concepts in Trek that was unexplained yet there all the time and turned it into a "how the hell are they a secret organization that doesn't care about secrecy, competency or doing something useful" So sad
Who asked you to change Star Trek forever?
Wasn't Discovery bad enough?
Click bait title
Boims is right, why would they go around advertising who they are. S31 is secretive, wtf is their a tv show
I don't think we need anything related to STAR TREK DISASTER,I mean discovery. Let go boldly someplace else.
Gene Roddenberry would be turning in his grave if he knew about this - as it goes against every concept he had of what Star Trek was about.. having said this I for one am looking forward to see if they screw it up or not....
Good ol Rick Dees to explain everything Star Trek
AI.
The funky "clandestine" pronunciation gives it away.
I remember that guy from LA radio years ago
Is star trek a utopia or does someone want to put a big tear in it? My humble opinion, there is plenty to bump heads with and not blow Cannon out the airlock ... 🖖
wow u guys dont know nothing man star trek voyager had the first woman captain lead
Voyager. Star Trek: Voyager. Kate Mulgrew captained the first woman-led Star Trek series.
She still so athletic for her age. I remember seeing her earlier kung fu movies as a Wing Chun Tofu kung fu girl and as co star with Stephen Chow as Court courtesan.
Isn't Paramount/CBS up for sale?
Not that this will make Paramount+ profitable.
BTW, how is this going to change Star Trek forever? I mean, Section 31 isn't new.
And as others have said, first woman-led Star Trek production? Is anyone else as tired about this 'we did it first' news only to be proven wrong seconds later as I am?
"First woman-led Star Trek project"??? Apparently Voyager's Captain Janeway was a figment of our imaginations for 7 years.
Jane was a captain of a ensemble series....Geo is the focus of this film.
They brought back Phil Coulson in AOS, why not Philippa Georgiou. It wouldn't be the first time a character faked their death.
So.....Section 31 is Starfleet's version of the CIA? 🤔
No,that will be Starfleet Intelligence
What a waste of time, reported for scamming people of their time.
No trailer, just clickbait.
Im glad star trek is expanding
Into other character advancemnts ty the show is becoming more realistic. Hopeful.
Stargate gave startrek a good rate ting whipping back in the day. Thy have learned from tht tytyty
What?!
Star Trek ended 2005. After that there are only Bad Reboot Productions.
Humbug
Yeah ...that trailer click bait trick was kinda dirty!
Completely incorrect. Voyager was woman led. How can you not know that?
Where's the trailer
In the trailer court
I've always considered Section 31 to be the Impossible Missions Force on steroids.
This is NOT a trailer. Nice clip reel, but you could just call it what it is.
there is no Trailer...just a word meant to serve as Click Bait.
Is William Sandler going to be in it (the head terrorist, from the second die hard movie)?
Shhhhhhh remember in Picard Section 31 had Kirk's data in their secret warehouse? You should remember that scene. Cause you're about to get a MAJOR surprise in Section 31 movie!! shhhhhh. I was not here. I did not say this. ;)
Not a trailer as stated in the name it's just some guy with his opinions and old footage.
Couldn't rely on content he had to be misleading
Not going to pay for Paramount Plus. 🤷
Misleading title. There is NO TRAILER! Don’t bother.
Click bait, this is not a trailer.
Get some reading comperension
Fans aren't "giddy", they're NAUSEATED. No one wants a villain-based Star Trek, esp not with #StarTrekLegacy left in to rot...
Where is the damn trailer??????
This is not a trailer and this is not the first time you've done this. Clickbait is oldschool.
Look Section 31 is not good, but the character ex Terran Ruler Phillip Geogio will make it interesting. Besides it is just a movie.
Imagine thinking of those things as "extreme measures" .
Technically, MIRROR Georgiou…
i'd prefer a series to a single movie. that's one just over an hour episode over multiple episodes that'd last over more time, but that's just me. 😒
Ffs, lots of repeats and insipid comments in this presentation that should have been one minute.
No filming - no trailer - clickbait
I bailed at the 7 minute mark. You take way too long to say what there is for you to say.
Janeway would say different
Never watched Discovery, but I assume this takes place outside of the prime universe
No it's in the Prime Universe where her Prime Counter part Captain Georgio was killed because of Burnham, but later on in the series Burnham saves the Terran Universe Georgio last minute and brings her to the Prime Universe where she takes the place of her former Prime counterpart.
@@derrickgoode5434yes. Terran Imperator Gerorgio had an change of heart, because she really love Burnham and that's why she is ally of the Federation. But in her own Way. Best candidate for Section 31
💯
Janeway?
The Emperor Protects!
Isn't she great
A woman to be respected! Can’t wait!
Can "materialize in 2023" ???? but the video wasn't posted till halfway through feb 2024, what kind of time travel shenanigans are going on here?
Oh dear.
Can’t wait
I never like Discovery because it is too far off Roddenbery's Star Trek visión. This new Michele Yeo might just go the same way. A chop-socky ST? I don't think so.
Sigh. Can Paramount make one fing decent Star Trek production? We had to wait for season 3 of Picard for something good and the had to fight for that. Its all crap lately top to bottom.
Protect the hive?
Clickbait
She was my favorite character in Discovery.
This is not a trailer. So dont call it that
They are going to have to try very haerd to make 'Section 31'a flop. Mivchelle Yeoh inhabits every role she plays effortlessly.
All these new Star Treks are craap.
Clickbait title, no trailer, endless babbling, misinformation ("first woman lead Star Trek production").. your typical TH-cam "news" channel.
Keep the clickbait up and you'll still be at 5k subscribers in 5 years..👌🏽