Having to use DSC on those partially dated connectors (DisplayPort 1.4) means no DSR, which is actually pretty impactful as far as game visuals go depending on the title. Considering this is coming out in 2024 and AMD cards already support DP 2.1 and I'm sure future Nvidia cards will also use it, it seems pretty disappointing to not go with DP 2.1.
@trippalhealicks Please don't get it bruv, bandwidth bottlenecking is no joke. In order to run 4k at 240hz with 8 or 10 bit depth, you're gonna need the 80gbps bandwidth that Displayport 2.1 provides
Yeah, none of the ports support 4K 240Hz *with HDR* even with DSC enabled. Hopefully another OEM does better. What a mundane oversight. Sounds like a suit decision.
DP 1.4 with DSC does support 4K@240Hz HDR @@Mageoftheyear (and of course HDMI 2.1 too, it does 188Hz and 153Hz for 4K SDR/HDR without DSC) See Wiki, look under refresh limits for HDR video, then under "including compression", HBR3 (aka DP1.3+) works 4K@240Hz en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#Refresh_frequency_limits_for_HDR_video I will probably also wait for DP 2.1 monitor though, DSC can cause issues with DSR/DLDSR at high bandwidth display modes too
@@Ranguvar13 You're right. I didn't see that table. My mistake. I'll make sure to mention that going forward. I still find it hard to believe that at this output the compression effect will be negligible. I really would want to see benchmarks - both technical as well as subjective user experience. I hope Hardware Unboxed does some.
@@Ranguvar13 What issues could there be caused with DSR/DLDSR? Currently have a 1440p 165Hz 10-bit and 2160p 144 Hz 12-bit display and planning to use this new one as main display in the middle. the 4000 series should hold, right?
Hope you didn't get any Nvidia card. Dp1.4 doesn't support 4K 240hz. If you want to take advantage you would need 7900xtx or xt, because they have Dp2.1
@@cxngo8124 i forgot about that, though technically my evga 3080 12gb can do 4k 240hz over dp 1.4 with dsc, but i dont want to run dsc, but i can just run lowwler framerates and be fine, then some time in the future ill be ready to full utilize the 240hz
lol stfu, you can use DSC and run 4K 240hz 10bit HDR easily with DP1.4 or HDMI 2.1. Why would he get a 7900xtx to run 4k 240hz when a 4090 will get way more FPS and aactually reach 240fps@@cxngo8124
@@hyxlo_ not all games , the 4090 had some difficulty in majority of triple A games nowadays especially RT on whats more for incoming games with unreal engine. The 1080p and 1440p people are already having fun while u wait for another series. and one more thing VC are so damn expensive then get obsolete all of a sudden in a year or 2
my only concern with this is that I work on my display for 8-10 hours so lots of static windows. Split screening apps on windows etc. Burn in is my big concern with OLED for a productivity/gaming rig. That 240 hz and motion of OLED seems so good. I have been using the 27inch ASUS PG27UQ since 2019; such an epic montior. I'm not sure if I would choose OLED over High Density Mini LED tho to be honest
@@ScottGrunwald Dont go OLED you will likely see burn in, in just 3 to 6 months of usage with that work rate. I know you want it for gaming but seriously its useless if you do far more work than gaming on it.
Awesome to see, finally proper format and high end specs all around! However I do wish it had DP2.1 really odd it doesn't hm. Also DFR would be amazing. As well as ELMB sync.
Unfortunately it's OLED so it's a hard pass. Too dim for a good HDR experience (if you are saying otherwise you have not seen proper HDR on MiniLED), and too many compromises to deal with burn-in.
@@chiefjudge8456 for HDR it would be good in dark room. Not fan of MiniLED it's not per pixel lit and can have horrible haloing, on top they're insanely expensive for what they are. Burn in yeah that is still being a fear getting a monitor. Can only see in time how oled monitors fair long term.
@@chiefjudge8456 which mini led monitor can keep with this up? the ipad has like 10 k dimming zones....all those mini leds monitors have like 200-300, they should learn from apple man
Please release it already so I can throw my money at you guys! 32 is definitely the sweet spot (currently using LG C2 42inch and I think 42inch is still too big)
I’m in the exact same boat. I have a 42 inch c2 and which is so awsome but at times is too big. Especially for those close mouse and keyboard games, controller not so bad as I can sit back. This needs to come asap
@@Captain-Chats Just make sure you start saving up for it, because I have a feeling it's going to sell out really fast and stock will be hard to find once it comes out! Seems a lot of people have been waiting for a 32in OLED model like this! lol
Why make an otherwise perfect monitor and not use Displayport 2.1? The targeted market for this monitor is not going to be thrilled paying 1.5k for a monitor that needs any sort of compression to hit it's native resolution.
HDMI 2.1 can hit it. However I agree. I want DP 2.1! But that's apple marekting bullshit. Where they purposely don't add it to make you buy the next year's model...
DP 1.4. HDMI 2.1 can do 4K 240Hz with DSC, but that's not with HDR enabled. You'd have to go down to 144Hz for that. Astoundingly bad decision on Asus' part. Wait for another OEM's take on this. Don't settle for anything less than DP 2.1
@@Mageoftheyear Even if the monitor is advertised as HDMI 2.1, most of the time its not even the full spec HDMI 2.1 that tops out at 48GPS, needed for 4k@144 sometimes they are 40 GPS, which is not enough for 4k@120, (full chroma 444) .
@@gohanpcgamer True. We really need A-B visual benchmarks of this monitor at 4K 240Hz HDR to tell us how bad the compression will be (if it even works at all).
This is basically my endgame monitor that before hadn't come out yet in the way I wanted to. Bit confused with this release but we'll see if this is truly the one I'll end up getting. I wanted a 4k 240hz OLED, glossy finish, at 27inches. This one is 32 which isn't a huge deal but harder to have with a triple monitor setup. The thing that worries me here is the last generation OLED plus the connectors not using DP 2.1. Considering you specifically mention "Previous-gen connectors couldn’t offer the bandwidth necessary to make this combination a reality" and use that as a reason to have DP 1.4 makes no sense. I might continue on the waiting game
Dang it! I just bought a Asus ROG PG32UQX mini-LED 144Hz monitor! Well, on the plus side the current 40 series GPUs can only do HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.4, so until the 50 series GPUs come out with DP2.1, getting 240Hz without compression issues will still be an issue with this model. I’ll look at getting one of these when I upgrade to the 5090 GPU. On a side note getting 240 fps in a modern game at 4K Ultra settings will be extremely hard to do and new games will keep pushing GPU hardware to its limits. So 144FPS at ultra settings seems more realistic to me in graphically demanding modern games at ultra settings and ray tracing turned on. I’ll hang on to my Asus ROG PG32UQX for a while, since I don’t have to worry about burn in with a mini-LED display and still get great blacks and contrast.
I have used the PG32UQX side by side with the LG C2, and the difference is not as big as people claim. Most people who make comments have no real world expierence with the hardware. One thing that absolutly it VERY noticable is the brightness and wow factor, not to mention color accuracy on the PG32UQX when compared to the C2.@@paul2609
This is actually insane, I'm craving for a 21:9 version but it's unlikely (imagine, 21:9, QD-OLED, 240Hz, the 4K equivalent to 3440x1440 [should be 2160x5 160]) I don't think this will be done but that's my dream monitor
It’s endgame until they make a GPU that can produce 4K 480hz. But we all know it would take many years before that happens. This is such a great news for all of us gamers!
There is no endgame or final frontiers in technology... everything changes and gets better each year. In few years there will be 8K monitors. Then who knows what.
@@Chasm9 But after a particular resolution like 8k you need very big monitors to actually see the difference so it's nearly end game. They may bring new technologies for better visuals but who knows.
Totally true. And for lower resolutions, 3840x1600 is also a better resolution than 3440x1440. Sadly most of the monitor manufacturers except for LG don't seem to get the idea.
I don't know if any current hardware can push 4K 240hz but hopefully it's a breeze with next generation hardware. I was looking at the PG27AQDM but this may be the next move
You can run 1440p on it and if you cant run 240 you can half it to 120, and itll still run and look amazing, especially since its oled, then when you upgrade you can bump up to the full 4k 240
games don't need to be played at 240 fps to be enjoyed. the resolution of this is more important, as previous monitors were only 1440p or 4K but only at 60 Hz.
it can do it if you play light games like cs go or indie games but not triple A but its not rly a hardware issue its more of optimizesation that what matters at the end of the day how much work they put into optimize the gamethat been proven meny times if you dont put enough work into optimize the game will run like shit
I have been using LG C2 42'' for 9 months, mostly for gaming and movies, but also for work sometimes. It is perfect for gaming. I keep all the pixel-burning protection features enabled - they are not annoying at all as some reviewers say and the panel is still perfect. And 120hz@4k is about the limit my 4090 can handle anyway. HDR/Brightness is good enough. It is great that there are more OLED options which means older models will get cheaper. And burn-in is not a thing anymore unless you use it for work all day on full brightness same content. But for a lot of people 42'' might be too much, so this 32''could be the perfect size/pixel density. Of course the 240hz@4k means you will need to use the DP 1.4 with DSC, but I have a 4k@144Hz LG IPS running DSC and I don't see the difference in quality at all when running it without DSC. Maybe this is more noticeable on OLED, will see.
For me, 120Hz or 144Hz makes no difference. Anything above 90FPS usually feels the same, for me, except for some FPS games I have tried on a 165Hz monitor and that I could notice. I have never tried more than 165Hz, but I guess the big jump from 120 to 240Hz is very noticeable, 120 to 144 not so much if at all. @1337kaas
@@FuriousLittleLatvian Cool. Thanks for the reply. I'm playing on a 165hz monitor now, so it's gonna be a small downgrade in refresh rate. But having 4k, hdr and oled will be worth it I think. I don't think the jump from 120hz to 240hz is gonna be as noticeable as the jump from 60 to 120.
Sorry, but OLED monitors are a bad idea in theory and in practice they're even worse. Too dim for a good HDR experience (if you are saying otherwise you have not seen proper HDR on MiniLED), and too many compromises to deal with burn-in.
@@ViscaBarca912 already did on my own monitor which uses dsc for a meer 155hz over 144hz, there is noticable fringe on light blue colours and noticable noise on clouds. The games where i noticed this is battlefield 2042, rdr2 and watch dogs: legion
@@ViscaBarca912 It disappears when i turn off DSC so donno what to tell you man, it's just my experience and i make my opinions based on that experience.
This is future proof considering it’s gonna be quite a long time before any pc setup could run triple a game’s at 4k 240hz so this should last a very long time even if it’s overly pricey
@@Davinmk Yes it is, and I hate when idiots say its not. I have owned OLEDs and QDOLEDs and look after them, they will burn in and its inevitable. If it wasn't an issue they wouldn't give you warranty for it, If it wasn't an issue then why do they have so many counter measures for it? That still don't fix it outright. If it wasn't an issue it literally would not happen. It happens, and it happens a lot even with those that take care so please stop telling people its not an issue when it very much is. Not only that but the issue is amplified even more for desktop usage unless you do what I did and hide everything and have no wallpaper. Not an issue but you have to look after the thing far more than any other panel type. Good one.
Thank you for finally doing a 32" monitor with OLED. To really interest me though it needs to be curved. I have a 32" monitor now and the curve really helps my eyes focus on such a large screen. Also, like others have said, it needs DP 2.1. Step in the right direction thouhh.
The only thing missing is a Gigabit Ethernet port so you can get that stable wired internet through that one and only USB-C cable you'll plug into this monitor with.
Looks awesome! Can't wait for Alienware to sell these at 999$ with 3 years burn in warranty! Maybe they'll sell the WOLED variant with 4k 240Hz / 1080p 480Hz DFR as well?
Wonder when exactly this is coming out. Holding off on getting a Samsung G8 for this monitor. Any advice would be much appreciated though. Thanks in advance.
YES!!!, keeping it 16:9 and non curved. 240hz is a bit of an overkill tho , OLED yes!! 32" yes!!! - interested what the response time is and release date
I use two monitors so It'd just be awkward for me to have two different shapes and I just find viewing text more comforting on a flat screen. You have Samsung for that.@@jonathanmoose757
i get that but if you play competitive yes its to big but for emersion wise its nothing called to big thats just your preference becouse for emersion the bigger the better actully i prefer 27 since i play competitive but for single player games most peaple use 32+ so it rly comes down to what you play
My Asus ROG Swift PG27U has been dying for months. It's on life support and barely can keep it going. This needs to hurry up and come out already. I can only get this to turn on so many more times!
This is the exact specs I have wanted thank you
2024Q1: I can't wait! 😍 (starting saving money right now! 😅😋)
Same here!
Its $1500 - not the exact price I wanted
@@gr743g43ggfb4 its asus
same
Having to use DSC on those partially dated connectors (DisplayPort 1.4) means no DSR, which is actually pretty impactful as far as game visuals go depending on the title. Considering this is coming out in 2024 and AMD cards already support DP 2.1 and I'm sure future Nvidia cards will also use it, it seems pretty disappointing to not go with DP 2.1.
If they aren't using DP 2.1, then don't even think about buying it
This is the spec that gives me pause about buying this particular monitor.
@trippalhealicks Please don't get it bruv, bandwidth bottlenecking is no joke. In order to run 4k at 240hz with 8 or 10 bit depth, you're gonna need the 80gbps bandwidth that Displayport 2.1 provides
Wait hold on you were gonna DSR past 4k??? Geez
@@MitchellTheMitch Yeah, I have no plans to. I'm happy with my LG 240Hz OLED monitor.
Seems like just the monitor I have been waiting for, except for DP1.4. I'm probably gonna wait for DP2.1, without the need for compression.
Yeah, none of the ports support 4K 240Hz *with HDR* even with DSC enabled.
Hopefully another OEM does better. What a mundane oversight. Sounds like a suit decision.
DP 1.4 with DSC does support 4K@240Hz HDR @@Mageoftheyear (and of course HDMI 2.1 too, it does 188Hz and 153Hz for 4K SDR/HDR without DSC)
See Wiki, look under refresh limits for HDR video, then under "including compression", HBR3 (aka DP1.3+) works 4K@240Hz
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#Refresh_frequency_limits_for_HDR_video
I will probably also wait for DP 2.1 monitor though, DSC can cause issues with DSR/DLDSR at high bandwidth display modes too
@@Ranguvar13 You're right. I didn't see that table. My mistake. I'll make sure to mention that going forward.
I still find it hard to believe that at this output the compression effect will be negligible. I really would want to see benchmarks - both technical as well as subjective user experience. I hope Hardware Unboxed does some.
@@MageoftheyearThe tech is visually lossless. Even professionals can’t reliably distinguish between DSC use or not.
@@Ranguvar13 What issues could there be caused with DSR/DLDSR? Currently have a 1440p 165Hz 10-bit and 2160p 144 Hz 12-bit display and planning to use this new one as main display in the middle. the 4000 series should hold, right?
This is truly the chosen one! finally a size that can be used as a computer monitor.
I just ordered the parts for my new build and these are the specs i was looking for! I will be buying day 1, cant wait!
Hope you didn't get any Nvidia card. Dp1.4 doesn't support 4K 240hz. If you want to take advantage you would need 7900xtx or xt, because they have Dp2.1
Me when the 4K gaming card doesn't support 4K 144hz+
@@cxngo8124 i forgot about that, though technically my evga 3080 12gb can do 4k 240hz over dp 1.4 with dsc, but i dont want to run dsc, but i can just run lowwler framerates and be fine, then some time in the future ill be ready to full utilize the 240hz
So you can't use a 4k monitor at 240hz with an Nvidia 4090 ?@@cxngo8124
lol stfu, you can use DSC and run 4K 240hz 10bit HDR easily with DP1.4 or HDMI 2.1. Why would he get a 7900xtx to run 4k 240hz when a 4090 will get way more FPS and aactually reach 240fps@@cxngo8124
The 32 in 4k gaming oled Era has arrived and I am all for it
good luck playing 4K games in 40fps below
@@PestiLencE638have you seen the 4090
@@hyxlo_ have u heard games evolving?
@@PestiLencE638 the 4090 will be 4K ready for a very long time.
@@hyxlo_ not all games , the 4090 had some difficulty in majority of triple A games nowadays especially RT on whats more for incoming games with unreal engine. The 1080p and 1440p people are already having fun while u wait for another series. and one more thing VC are so damn expensive then get obsolete all of a sudden in a year or 2
Glad I held off on buying the Asus ROG Swift PG32UQ IPS model. This is the OLED monitor that I've been waiting for.
Ewww IPS... 🤮🤮🤮
my only concern with this is that I work on my display for 8-10 hours so lots of static windows. Split screening apps on windows etc. Burn in is my big concern with OLED for a productivity/gaming rig. That 240 hz and motion of OLED seems so good. I have been using the 27inch ASUS PG27UQ since 2019; such an epic montior. I'm not sure if I would choose OLED over High Density Mini LED tho to be honest
@@ScottGrunwald Dont go OLED you will likely see burn in, in just 3 to 6 months of usage with that work rate. I know you want it for gaming but seriously its useless if you do far more work than gaming on it.
same here. i like 1440p but lets be honest its not gonna drive an enthusiast gpu.
@@ScottGrunwaldthen buy a productivity monitor
I want to see if the sub pixel structure has changed since it has improved text clarity
Nah, I bet improved text clarity comes from higher resolution and the subpixel structure will stay the same
It has changed for 2nd Gen QD-OLED.
@@alexp3577 this is QD-OLED gen 2, pixel layout is different.
If it's similar to the S95C, then no it won't.
@@paul2609 is there any QD-OLED TV with a different subpixel layout?
Buying it the moment it releases. This is exactly what we’ve been waiting for!!!
I'm waiting for 4k240 oled in 42 inches. And then I'm waiting some more for it to drop to under 1k.
Then RMA it 3 months after due to QD-OLED burn-in.
waiting for an open boxed one at best buy lol @@SaltyMaud
Asus is not a good company. Their motheroboards, Rog ally and laptops all have issues
ur gonna be sorely disappointed when you get burn in
Why is there no DP 2.1?! Otherwise it would have been the perfect monitor…
DP1.4 makes this DoA. Why have the perfect specs and then bottleneck it by cheaping out on the port?!?
"Because five dolla.
Now give $2K."
OH MY GOD IT'S HAPPENING, THE DAY HAS FINALLY ARRIVED.
Why does this not have DP2.1?
thank god you made it gloss!!!!! gaming on an LG OLED TV for 3 years and this is what ive been waiting to upgrade to!!!!
Awesome to see, finally proper format and high end specs all around! However I do wish it had DP2.1 really odd it doesn't hm. Also DFR would be amazing. As well as ELMB sync.
Unfortunately it's OLED so it's a hard pass. Too dim for a good HDR experience (if you are saying otherwise you have not seen proper HDR on MiniLED), and too many compromises to deal with burn-in.
@@chiefjudge8456 for HDR it would be good in dark room. Not fan of MiniLED it's not per pixel lit and can have horrible haloing, on top they're insanely expensive for what they are. Burn in yeah that is still being a fear getting a monitor. Can only see in time how oled monitors fair long term.
are you just commenting on everyone's comment the same exact thing? super strange@@chiefjudge8456
@@chiefjudge8456 which mini led monitor can keep with this up? the ipad has like 10 k dimming zones....all those mini leds monitors have like 200-300, they should learn from apple man
because it is not necessarywont be until 8K monitors are a thing. 1.4 gives it all the data transfer it needs.
Please release it already so I can throw my money at you guys!
32 is definitely the sweet spot (currently using LG C2 42inch and I think 42inch is still too big)
I’m in the exact same boat. I have a 42 inch c2 and which is so awsome but at times is too big. Especially for those close mouse and keyboard games, controller not so bad as I can sit back. This needs to come asap
@@Captain-Chats Just make sure you start saving up for it, because I have a feeling it's going to sell out really fast and stock will be hard to find once it comes out! Seems a lot of people have been waiting for a 32in OLED model like this! lol
27 inch is the best
Why make an otherwise perfect monitor and not use Displayport 2.1?
The targeted market for this monitor is not going to be thrilled paying 1.5k for a monitor that needs any sort of compression to hit it's native resolution.
Yup. Designers must've had a stroke when deciding which version of display port to use.
HDMI 2.1 can hit it. However I agree. I want DP 2.1! But that's apple marekting bullshit. Where they purposely don't add it to make you buy the next year's model...
@@DefensiveLimestone The Tech Chap got hands on with it and had that confirmed by the staff at the booth.
@@DefensiveLimestone multiple places it says dp1.4
DSC is loseless, why does it matter?
Can’t wait for mine to show up! Definitely looking forward to 27” versions
I hope 27 inch ones come out soon
4K on a 27in is completely overkill stays at 2k res on a 27in
@@ImSimpIicity Not with OLED's pentile matrix subpixels, especially with text
@@ImSimpIicitycasual take. It's not overkill at all.
Thats years away. 32 is pushing it for OLED.
Does it have Displayport 2.1? As I wants this for my Radeon 7900 XTX.
DP 1.4.
HDMI 2.1 can do 4K 240Hz with DSC, but that's not with HDR enabled.
You'd have to go down to 144Hz for that.
Astoundingly bad decision on Asus' part. Wait for another OEM's take on this. Don't settle for anything less than DP 2.1
@@Mageoftheyear Even if the monitor is advertised as HDMI 2.1, most of the time its not even the full spec HDMI 2.1 that tops out at 48GPS, needed for 4k@144 sometimes they are 40 GPS, which is not enough for 4k@120, (full chroma 444) .
@@gohanpcgamer True. We really need A-B visual benchmarks of this monitor at 4K 240Hz HDR to tell us how bad the compression will be (if it even works at all).
Please, please have a Glossy variant!
This is basically my endgame monitor that before hadn't come out yet in the way I wanted to.
Bit confused with this release but we'll see if this is truly the one I'll end up getting.
I wanted a 4k 240hz OLED, glossy finish, at 27inches. This one is 32 which isn't a huge deal but harder to have with a triple monitor setup. The thing that worries me here is the last generation OLED plus the connectors not using DP 2.1.
Considering you specifically mention "Previous-gen connectors couldn’t offer the bandwidth necessary to make this combination a reality" and use that as a reason to have DP 1.4 makes no sense. I might continue on the waiting game
Dang it! I just bought a Asus ROG PG32UQX mini-LED 144Hz monitor! Well, on the plus side the current 40 series GPUs can only do HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.4, so until the 50 series GPUs come out with DP2.1, getting 240Hz without compression issues will still be an issue with this model. I’ll look at getting one of these when I upgrade to the 5090 GPU.
On a side note getting 240 fps in a modern game at 4K Ultra settings will be extremely hard to do and new games will keep pushing GPU hardware to its limits. So 144FPS at ultra settings seems more realistic to me in graphically demanding modern games at ultra settings and ray tracing turned on. I’ll hang on to my Asus ROG PG32UQX for a while, since I don’t have to worry about burn in with a mini-LED display and still get great blacks and contrast.
Don't bother. It's DP 1.4 still
@@mz1929 really?!! That’s absolutely idiotic in my opinion. We need DisplayPort 2.1 gaming monitors and Nvidia GPUs with 2.1.
The Mini LED is going to still be the flagship! Trust me.
@@connor040606 Not if you want absolutely best motion clarity.
I have used the PG32UQX side by side with the LG C2, and the difference is not as big as people claim. Most people who make comments have no real world expierence with the hardware. One thing that absolutly it VERY noticable is the brightness and wow factor, not to mention color accuracy on the PG32UQX when compared to the C2.@@paul2609
Thank You for giving us such specifications
I'll stick with the LG C2 at least if has HDMI 2.1. The fact you guys did not add DP 2.1 is disappointing
THANK YOU (however is it a clarity-ruining matte finish, or a clear beautiful gloss display?)
I've been waiting for these specs for years, finally!
This is actually insane, I'm craving for a 21:9 version but it's unlikely (imagine, 21:9, QD-OLED, 240Hz, the 4K equivalent to 3440x1440 [should be 2160x5 160])
I don't think this will be done but that's my dream monitor
same. a widescreen qd-oled monitor that's 4k and 1440, would be a dream come true.
@@josephkim007 yes, even if it would cost 2500+
I'm actually waiting for this to replace my ultrawide QD-Oled, I just can't get on with it, I find it annoying more times than anything.
Alienware did that
@@Takkion it's the 1440p one right? Alienware AW3423DW QD OLED? imagine that one but 4k
No DisplayPort 2.1 is just a total fail in what seems to be a great piece of gear apart from that :(
When is this dropping? I can’t find any hard dates anywhere
Asus... you had the home-run in your freaking hands. Then... DisplayPort 1.4 🤨
my dream specs, cant wait for this panel
Why no displayport 2.1? This monitor should have released along next gen gpus.. guess i’ll wait for lg and others to add dp 2.1 in their panels
Bc Apple Marketing strategies
This is it, this is the monitor I have been waiting for
It’s endgame until they make a GPU that can produce 4K 480hz. But we all know it would take many years before that happens. This is such a great news for all of us gamers!
There is no endgame or final frontiers in technology... everything changes and gets better each year. In few years there will be 8K monitors. Then who knows what.
@@Chasm9 virtual reality or augmented reality
@@Chasm9 But after a particular resolution like 8k you need very big monitors to actually see the difference so it's nearly end game. They may bring new technologies for better visuals but who knows.
I would love this as a 5k2k ultrawide. 38-40" ultrawide is just perfect.
Totally true. And for lower resolutions, 3840x1600 is also a better resolution than 3440x1440. Sadly most of the monitor manufacturers except for LG don't seem to get the idea.
I don't know if any current hardware can push 4K 240hz but hopefully it's a breeze with next generation hardware. I was looking at the PG27AQDM but this may be the next move
You can run 1440p on it and if you cant run 240 you can half it to 120, and itll still run and look amazing, especially since its oled, then when you upgrade you can bump up to the full 4k 240
I am able to run most games on 4K >180FPS Ultra on RTX 4090 so it's doable.
games don't need to be played at 240 fps to be enjoyed. the resolution of this is more important, as previous monitors were only 1440p or 4K but only at 60 Hz.
Especually if it has gsync or at least is compatible, itll be an amazing monitor
it can do it if you play light games like cs go or indie games but not triple A but its not rly a hardware issue its more of optimizesation that what matters at the end of the day how much work they put into optimize the gamethat been proven meny times if you dont put enough work into optimize the game will run like shit
ROG Desk Mount Kit ACL01 is it compatible with ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM
I have been using LG C2 42'' for 9 months, mostly for gaming and movies, but also for work sometimes. It is perfect for gaming. I keep all the pixel-burning protection features enabled - they are not annoying at all as some reviewers say and the panel is still perfect. And 120hz@4k is about the limit my 4090 can handle anyway. HDR/Brightness is good enough. It is great that there are more OLED options which means older models will get cheaper. And burn-in is not a thing anymore unless you use it for work all day on full brightness same content. But for a lot of people 42'' might be too much, so this 32''could be the perfect size/pixel density. Of course the 240hz@4k means you will need to use the DP 1.4 with DSC, but I have a 4k@144Hz LG IPS running DSC and I don't see the difference in quality at all when running it without DSC. Maybe this is more noticeable on OLED, will see.
Thanks for the confirmation. Just ordered a c3 for the price of the c2. It'll probably blow everything out of the water. Do you miss the 144hz?
For me, 120Hz or 144Hz makes no difference. Anything above 90FPS usually feels the same, for me, except for some FPS games I have tried on a 165Hz monitor and that I could notice. I have never tried more than 165Hz, but I guess the big jump from 120 to 240Hz is very noticeable, 120 to 144 not so much if at all. @1337kaas
@@FuriousLittleLatvian Cool. Thanks for the reply. I'm playing on a 165hz monitor now, so it's gonna be a small downgrade in refresh rate. But having 4k, hdr and oled will be worth it I think. I don't think the jump from 120hz to 240hz is gonna be as noticeable as the jump from 60 to 120.
you're definitely not good enough at any video game to need 240hz shut up lmao @PlanetH0PE
Sorry, but OLED monitors are a bad idea in theory and in practice they're even worse. Too dim for a good HDR experience (if you are saying otherwise you have not seen proper HDR on MiniLED), and too many compromises to deal with burn-in.
Still waiting for 27" 4K 240Hz. Maybe one day..
I think those specs would not be possible because 32 inch is becoming a basic standard for 4k now.
Finally, the monitor I've been waiting for! Please keep it within my budget :)
Dude, it's gonna be top of the line product so be prepared to spend some $$ on this shit.
Probably around $1,5-2k 😅
$3000+ wouldn’t surprise me
I am pretty sure they have already said it's going to be around $1500
When will be available?
4k 240hz is not something i want until Displayport 2.0 comes out... I avoid DSC at all cost...
Ill give you $100 dollars if you can pass a blind test between DSC and native
@@ViscaBarca912 already did on my own monitor which uses dsc for a meer 155hz over 144hz, there is noticable fringe on light blue colours and noticable noise on clouds. The games where i noticed this is battlefield 2042, rdr2 and watch dogs: legion
that is probably an issue with your monitor or setup, DSC is lossless @@IrrationalThings
@@ViscaBarca912 It disappears when i turn off DSC so donno what to tell you man, it's just my experience and i make my opinions based on that experience.
thats fair, ive also used DSC on my 4K monitor and haven't noticed any differences @@IrrationalThings
Still with DP 1.4? Can you guys please update the outdated ports of your monitors already.
This is future proof considering it’s gonna be quite a long time before any pc setup could run triple a game’s at 4k 240hz so this should last a very long time even if it’s overly pricey
Seeing as this is QD-OLED you might get burn in even before you see any game that can fully take advantage of this 😅
@@Pandemonium088burn in really isn’t that much of an issue anymore
This is more about running games in 4k 120hz for casual titles and 1440p 240hz for competitive titles
You aint playing future AAA at 240fps as game tech will keep pushing hardware a lot still. Its more for “competitive” gaming
@@Davinmk Yes it is, and I hate when idiots say its not. I have owned OLEDs and QDOLEDs and look after them, they will burn in and its inevitable. If it wasn't an issue they wouldn't give you warranty for it, If it wasn't an issue then why do they have so many counter measures for it? That still don't fix it outright. If it wasn't an issue it literally would not happen. It happens, and it happens a lot even with those that take care so please stop telling people its not an issue when it very much is. Not only that but the issue is amplified even more for desktop usage unless you do what I did and hide everything and have no wallpaper. Not an issue but you have to look after the thing far more than any other panel type. Good one.
Do firmware updates still void your warranty?
Mind officially blown! 🤯 Unbelievably stunning gaming monitor, a true masterpiece! 🖥
You aren't going to wait for independent 3rd party reviews or first hand experience before reaching conclusions? 🤦♂️
I'll even go a step further - the press release video 'is' unbelievable, a true PR masterpiece. while the monitor itself; well it doesn't exist yet.
@@GatorRican if it doesn't exist, then what were the press tech reviewers looking at?
It hasn't officially released yet is what he meant.@@tsdbhg
@@YavNe Really? 🤦♂️
When will this great Thing Released?
THIS is the monitor I want but I'm sure it's gonna cost more than a 4090
Around $1500 USD is the price another TH-camr listed
lol
@@goodcat3437
Hope there could be a 27“ 4K or even 5K ROG OLED monitor.
27 is to small for 4k
@@XeqtrM1 32" is too big for a pc monitor
@@drasyte7017 It's fine, it's about the distance you sit from the monitor.
That's for him to decide now isn't it?@@XeqtrM1
@@XeqtrM1 Having bad eyesight would be the only legitimate reason for saying "27" is too small for 4K".
USB-C with PD of how many Watts? 90-100W 🤞🙏
this shits going to be like 3000$
+$1,000 for Asus Tax
Price is suppose to be $1,500.
Is it better than Samsung Odyssy G8 NEO 240Hz? I've G8 Neo 32" 240Hz I don't think I need to upgrade
Would really like a high gloss 27" variant.
DisplayPort 1.4.....
🤣🤣🤣
HARD PASS!!!
cant go back to flat 32 INCHES, after i finally got neo g8 with his curvature... pretty happy with it
Thank you for finally doing a 32" monitor with OLED. To really interest me though it needs to be curved. I have a 32" monitor now and the curve really helps my eyes focus on such a large screen. Also, like others have said, it needs DP 2.1. Step in the right direction thouhh.
ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM
This one is curved. 1440p, not 4k.
Don't buy it then lol. I'm buying one day of release.
Flat all the way.
The only thing missing is a Gigabit Ethernet port so you can get that stable wired internet through that one and only USB-C cable you'll plug into this monitor with.
Bruh just give it DP 2.1 and thank god it's a glossy finish.
Wow--this is basically a GOD Mode Monitor. What kind of HDR Specs are we talking here? Please tell me their good and that this has a glossy screen!!
damn this monitor alone costs more than my pc😅
What is the best gaming monitor for ps5 and Xbox series x
Looks awesome! Can't wait for Alienware to sell these at 999$ with 3 years burn in warranty! Maybe they'll sell the WOLED variant with 4k 240Hz / 1080p 480Hz DFR as well?
Dreaming
Wonder when exactly this is coming out. Holding off on getting a Samsung G8 for this monitor. Any advice would be much appreciated though. Thanks in advance.
YES!!!, keeping it 16:9 and non curved. 240hz is a bit of an overkill tho , OLED yes!! 32" yes!!! - interested what the response time is and release date
Help me with it not being curved is a good thing. I'm on the verge of buying a new monitor. I have a AMD Radeon 6950xt for GPU.
Victory!!
I use two monitors so It'd just be awkward for me to have two different shapes and I just find viewing text more comforting on a flat screen. You have Samsung for that.@@jonathanmoose757
240 hz isn't overkill at all for ROG lmfao
@@thomascarson4677 lol, depending what games you play i suppose, coz i play quite a fair bit of AAA fps games and they are demanding
Is it glossy?
DP 1.4 = HARD PASS
Is this monitors available?
Bought the 27 Zoll 1440p OLED a few weeks ago, and waiting for the 4k 27 Inch Version. 32 ist to big for gaming.
i get that but if you play competitive yes its to big but for emersion wise its nothing called to big thats just your preference becouse for emersion the bigger the better actully i prefer 27 since i play competitive but for single player games most peaple use 32+ so it rly comes down to what you play
27 is too small for gaming
@@masonopick9688 most competitive FPS players prefer 24"
You are just tossing out one bullshit comment after the next aren't ya?@@XeqtrM1
@@paul2609Them preferring doesn't mean anything.
With the way you treated customers ASUS with your motherboard.... I'm not daring becoming your tester...
You should've seen my Asus monitor. They had production issues and released it with issues.
This!!! Their motherboards, Rog Ally, and laptops all have issues unlike others... Stay away from Asus!
How is this not using displayport 2.1? DP 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 don’t have anywhere near the bandwidth throughout needed for 4K @ 240 hz.
pointless if you dont slap 2 200mm noctuas at the back, have better things to do than get it replaced every 3 months
Is it vesa HDR certified?
It is HDR 400 True Black certified
I know that it is mostly for gaming, but can you still use it to also draw on it?
yes you can draw on it, it has touch support and you can use a pen to draw if you press hard enough
God damn! I'm happy with my AW3423DW but shieeet this looks good. I guess pairing it up with a 5090 or whatever down the line would hit the sweet spot
I’ve waited for so long time for a monitor with these specs, I will buy this one among the 3 new Asus monitors
I was waiting for this exact specs to release, now I can get my hands on to this piece.
Samsung qd oled panels are gorgeous. Just saw a samsung qd oled 77" tv in best buy, insane colors on true black.
I was looking for so long for a monitor and this one is it!. I definitly going to buy it.
RGB pixel layout or BGR?
Does it support dolby vision?
is there a preorder ? i need this
My Asus ROG Swift PG27U has been dying for months. It's on life support and barely can keep it going. This needs to hurry up and come out already. I can only get this to turn on so many more times!
When does it release?
THIS IS PERFECT , now please put the price reasonably
So when will it fully release?
Is this still projected to come out this year? I didnt see it at CES.
Yes Feb 16
Is this QD-OLED gen 2 though?
Should be, as the G9 has the same "improved sub pixel layout" advertising so that means new panel
I want this so bad
Glossy?
release date to buy ?
ohhhh SO AMAZING !!!! Im in love!!!!
Is it glass? I don't want matte
When it comes?
Release ??? Price ???
what about hdr and freesync?
Where’s the link to buy it
Does anyone know what month in 2024 this monitor might go on sale??????😊😊😊😊😊
Finally, the perfect monitor!!!
perfect specifications I was looking for