I’d rather pay for net zero than to line Rishi’s Father-in-laws pockets! Oh hang on I’m already paying a premium for renewable energy, it’s the non-renewables that aren’t paying windfall taxes
He's not moving the net zero date (which is still 2050). This is the date for banning the sale of new petrol/diesel cars, which he's moved back 5 years. No one was planning to introduce net zero by 2030.
Keir Stamer want to stop sourcing jobs to places like India. Very dangerous idea to India economy. Every Indian duty to stop him. Vote Tory we need outsourcing companies to bring more foreign workers to UK. 💪💪🇮🇳 Support Sunak!
How exactly is approving new licenses for North sea oil extraction going to get the UK to net zero. Any claim that this will benefit the UK is nonsense, the only beneficiaries will be the oil and gas companies involved. The tax breaks for extraction will cancel out any benefits for the treasury, and the oil and gas extracted will be sold on the open world market, ensuring that it will not improve UK energy security. Labour may have decided not to cancel the licenses when they gain power, but they could insist that all the oil and gas extracted is hypothecated for use by the UK consumer alone and not sold on the world market. That way the reserve would last longer, and would actually guarantee the UK supply of oil and gas until green energy can take over. Such an arrangement would also reduce UK fossil fuel imports, actually saving the consumer money. If the oil and gas cannot be guaranteed for UK use only, then leave it in the ground.
No more donations from John Cauldwell "It's not just a question of whether I donate, it's a question of whether I support by my vote" 😂😂😂 #NetZero confidence Congratulations 🎉 #EXIT24 Sunak unfit to lead.
I don't trust a word Rishi says he has gone back on all his pledges so Suella for Priminister she tells the truth and has integrity something Rishi will never have
we've gone over the event horizon with regard to costs. renewables are a lot cheaper than Fossil If you delay, it will cost more not less Quote The OBR concludes: the debt impact of future volatility in gas prices is at 13% of the UK gross domestic product (GDP) to 2050. This dwarfs the debt impact of 6% of GDP for investing in net zero. Second, it investigates the potential of new, growing energy solutions to cushion price volatility Quote With the energy price cap below £1,300 throughout 2021, UK households spent around £30 billion on energy during the year. In 2023 the projected spend is around £170 billion. This is equivalent to more than doubling the basic rate of income tax from 20% to 45% or almost doubling VAT from 20% to 38%. Just over 6% of GDP
Keir STAMER wants to stop out sourcing jobs to places like India. Very dangerous idea to India economy. Every Indian duty to stop him. Vote Tory we need outsourcing companies to bring more foreign workers to UK. 💪💪🇮🇳 Support Sunak!
Is pragmatism a conservative equivalent for procrastination? Unfortunately the deadlines for NetZero are not as arbitrary as the PM would like to imply. The human race is facing a global extinction event as a result of global warming. The 2050 deadline may be an arbitrary pragmatic date, but many believe that it is already too late. The technology required to replace fossil fuels is not really not ready, but we are in this position because of government procrastination and willful obstruction by the fossil fuel industry, which has concealed the catastrophe the human is facing for years, in the name of pragmatic preservation of its outrageous profits. Rather than putting back a deadline that already appears too late, the UK government should be putting maximum effort into addressing the technological deficit that decades of lethargy has produced. Even now there is the suspicion that hidden in the relaxation of the NetZero targets is a real goal of maintaining the profits for the governments rich friends in the fossil fuel industry and the property market. The World is facing a global climate emergency, and while the UK meeting net zero alone will not save it, the UK addressing the challenge with urgency would go a long way to making the UK an industrial leader in the new green technologies. It has always been the case that successive UK governments would prefer to waste a pound to extract a penny in extra tax, rather than invest ten pence to save the citizens a pound. As a result there is a litany of myopic decisions that have resulted in missed opportunities that have cost the UK greatly. From the failure to save the north sea oil and gas revenues in a sovereign wealth fund, to a failure to improve building regulations to make UK homes fit for purpose. In every case the decision can be traced to maintaining a maximum profit for a minority of government friends. This is just another example of willful procrastination in the name of short term profits for a few. In the long term it always cost the country a great deal more.
we've gone over the event horizon with regard to costs. renewables are a lot cheaper than Fossil If you delay, it will cost more not less Quote The OBR concludes: the debt impact of future volatility in gas prices is at 13% of the UK gross domestic product (GDP) to 2050. This dwarfs the debt impact of 6% of GDP for investing in net zero. Second, it investigates the potential of new, growing energy solutions to cushion price volatility Quote With the energy price cap below £1,300 throughout 2021, UK households spent around £30 billion on energy during the year. In 2023 the projected spend is around £170 billion. This is equivalent to more than doubling the basic rate of income tax from 20% to 45% or almost doubling VAT from 20% to 38%. Just over 6% of GDP
@@SlowhandGreg The PM policies are being driven by the rapidly approaching general election. The government will try and put in place policies that favour it's friends, knowing it is unlikely to be in power after the general election. Labour could stop further north sea oil and gas extraction by simply saying that it will revoke the extraction license. Since the UK will receive little advantage from the extraction, there seems no reason not to block the process. Labour argues that it's a matter of sticking to government commitments, but by making a clear statement now that a labour government will revoke the permission for extraction, the companies involved will likely not go ahead with the plan. It would be at their risk if they did. The issue would be less clear if all the oil extracted was guaranteed for UK use only, and not to be offered on the world market.
When is the no confidence vote? This country can't take any more of you.
Sunak losing his seat the next election would be poetic justice to this planet 😂
Love our Britain 🇬🇧 vote Reform 😃
I’d rather pay for net zero than to line Rishi’s Father-in-laws pockets! Oh hang on I’m already paying a premium for renewable energy, it’s the non-renewables that aren’t paying windfall taxes
Always had confidence Rishi would bring the petrol sale forward another 5 years, Labour wouldn't have achieved net-zero In 7 years no chance
He's not moving the net zero date (which is still 2050). This is the date for banning the sale of new petrol/diesel cars, which he's moved back 5 years. No one was planning to introduce net zero by 2030.
@@jackpearson5285 i meant the petrol sale, and labour's manifesto involves net zero 2030, whereas Conservative is 2050 as planned
Keir Stamer want to stop sourcing jobs to places like India. Very dangerous idea to India economy. Every Indian duty to stop him. Vote Tory we need outsourcing companies to bring more foreign workers to UK. 💪💪🇮🇳 Support Sunak!
VOTE REFORM !
I done three days worth of beef dinners into a plastic bag .
Fishy rishi GO
Zero seats zero mercy! / from public incoming 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Honesty, from the conservatives 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lair lair 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 desperate lies
How exactly is approving new licenses for North sea oil extraction going to get the UK to net zero. Any claim that this will benefit the UK is nonsense, the only beneficiaries will be the oil and gas companies involved. The tax breaks for extraction will cancel out any benefits for the treasury, and the oil and gas extracted will be sold on the open world market, ensuring that it will not improve UK energy security.
Labour may have decided not to cancel the licenses when they gain power, but they could insist that all the oil and gas extracted is hypothecated for use by the UK consumer alone and not sold on the world market. That way the reserve would last longer, and would actually guarantee the UK supply of oil and gas until green energy can take over. Such an arrangement would also reduce UK fossil fuel imports, actually saving the consumer money.
If the oil and gas cannot be guaranteed for UK use only, then leave it in the ground.
Zero seats?
No more donations from John Cauldwell "It's not just a question of whether I donate, it's a question of whether I support by my vote"
😂😂😂 #NetZero confidence Congratulations 🎉 #EXIT24 Sunak unfit to lead.
Why would families be more affected than people?
Get the Tories out…NOW!
Enoch was right.
Enoch was a fascist.
I don't trust a word Rishi says he has gone back on all his pledges so Suella for Priminister she tells the truth and has integrity something Rishi will never have
Tories out
we've gone over the event horizon with regard to costs. renewables are a lot cheaper than Fossil
If you delay, it will cost more not less
Quote
The OBR concludes: the debt impact of future volatility in gas prices is at 13% of the UK gross domestic product (GDP) to 2050. This dwarfs the debt impact of 6% of GDP for investing in net zero. Second, it investigates the potential of new, growing energy solutions to cushion price volatility
Quote
With the energy price cap below £1,300 throughout 2021, UK households spent around £30 billion on energy during the year. In 2023 the projected spend is around £170 billion. This is equivalent to more than doubling the basic rate of income tax from 20% to 45% or almost doubling VAT from 20% to 38%. Just over 6% of GDP
Of course, we as Conservatives should be pragmatic.
Keir STAMER wants to stop out sourcing jobs to places like India. Very dangerous idea to India economy. Every Indian duty to stop him. Vote Tory we need outsourcing companies to bring more foreign workers to UK. 💪💪🇮🇳 Support Sunak!
Pragmatic? That's Tory code for piss off and be thankful I haven't made your existence illegal yet.
Partisans and delegates are profiting from empty homes, lets, legalise cannabis. TAX, into the armed forces
Amen.
Is pragmatism a conservative equivalent for procrastination? Unfortunately the deadlines for NetZero are not as arbitrary as the PM would like to imply. The human race is facing a global extinction event as a result of global warming. The 2050 deadline may be an arbitrary pragmatic date, but many believe that it is already too late.
The technology required to replace fossil fuels is not really not ready, but we are in this position because of government procrastination and willful obstruction by the fossil fuel industry, which has concealed the catastrophe the human is facing for years, in the name of pragmatic preservation of its outrageous profits.
Rather than putting back a deadline that already appears too late, the UK government should be putting maximum effort into addressing the technological deficit that decades of lethargy has produced.
Even now there is the suspicion that hidden in the relaxation of the NetZero targets is a real goal of maintaining the profits for the governments rich friends in the fossil fuel industry and the property market. The World is facing a global climate emergency, and while the UK meeting net zero alone will not save it, the UK addressing the challenge with urgency would go a long way to making the UK an industrial leader in the new green technologies.
It has always been the case that successive UK governments would prefer to waste a pound to extract a penny in extra tax, rather than invest ten pence to save the citizens a pound.
As a result there is a litany of myopic decisions that have resulted in missed opportunities that have cost the UK greatly. From the failure to save the north sea oil and gas revenues in a sovereign wealth fund, to a failure to improve building regulations to make UK homes fit for purpose. In every case the decision can be traced to maintaining a maximum profit for a minority of government friends. This is just another example of willful procrastination in the name of short term profits for a few. In the long term it always cost the country a great deal more.
we've gone over the event horizon with regard to costs. renewables are a lot cheaper than Fossil
If you delay, it will cost more not less
Quote
The OBR concludes: the debt impact of future volatility in gas prices is at 13% of the UK gross domestic product (GDP) to 2050. This dwarfs the debt impact of 6% of GDP for investing in net zero. Second, it investigates the potential of new, growing energy solutions to cushion price volatility
Quote
With the energy price cap below £1,300 throughout 2021, UK households spent around £30 billion on energy during the year. In 2023 the projected spend is around £170 billion. This is equivalent to more than doubling the basic rate of income tax from 20% to 45% or almost doubling VAT from 20% to 38%. Just over 6% of GDP
@@SlowhandGreg The PM policies are being driven by the rapidly approaching general election. The government will try and put in place policies that favour it's friends, knowing it is unlikely to be in power after the general election. Labour could stop further north sea oil and gas extraction by simply saying that it will revoke the extraction license. Since the UK will receive little advantage from the extraction, there seems no reason not to block the process. Labour argues that it's a matter of sticking to government commitments, but by making a clear statement now that a labour government will revoke the permission for extraction, the companies involved will likely not go ahead with the plan. It would be at their risk if they did.
The issue would be less clear if all the oil extracted was guaranteed for UK use only, and not to be offered on the world market.
First
Love our Britain 🇬🇧 vote Reform 😃
Love our Britain 🇬🇧 vote Reform 😃
Love our Britain 🇬🇧 vote Reform 😃