Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video! Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all Buy the ASUS 480Hz OLED: Coming Soon Buy the ASUS 4K 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/3yqKCak Buy the ASUS "Glossy" OLED: amzn.to/4fTbala
@@pirx9798 i mean that's fine i'd probably love glossy too if ever tried one but the way this guy talks about it like all matte monitors should be set on fire
how come you didnt mention the 240hz BFI ? at this refresh rate u will be able to enjoy a astonishing motion clarity with a much more acceptable perfomance cost... at least for me that's the big news about this new monitor
@@thedisplayguy to me i dont see it as that big of an issue, the games that would benefit from constant 240 above are esports games that are still demanding or limiting enough to not reach the 480. that would be say quake, apex etc can use the bfi mode and then for aaa titles where you dont reach 240 or games where you can reach 480 like ow, valo etc you can just leave it normal and let gsync help in the variable frames and enable the vrr flicker setting to resolve the issue and once we go to media consumption we could again keep it normal mode for brightness, and i doubt for apex and quake we need any hdr or brightness to play it.
@@thedisplayguy Which is why 240hz BFI is great news, because you decrease the length of time (the pulse width) in which the black frame is displayed. This benefits brightness greatly. Like a camera shutter but instead your emitting light, not capturing it.
I still have several CRTs on which that test UFO looks completely clear. However, I do find the LG CX and C1 with their 312 Hz motion clarity due to their BFI equivalent (i.e., rolling scan) to already be compelling. A dream monitor really. I think this is because 312 Hz equivalent motion is already enough to bring us from the blur that still is 120 Hz to a place where the image is really starting to resolve. (E.g., can make out on the UFO a solid control stick, defined lines, even I think that there's 3 eyes.) It's just already a night and day difference.
Given how BFI works, would it enable OLEDs to crank their lit frames brighter to offset the black frames' hit to brightness? Ideally, the black frames would also be cooling down the OLED.
Guys we are almost half way to that 1000hz displays! The OLED monitor space is making big advancements in very little time. Hopefully brands continue to push limits further and not slow down.
@@nichronos You are lost, I get stable 1k fps on h2m ( mwr mod client on pc ) at 1440p extra, same goes with any other old cod client. 400 fps on MW2023 at 1440p low/normal. RTX 4080, Ryzen 7 7800x3d. You are clueless if you think we can't hit 1000 fps in games we play the most, including older cod clients, cs2 ( I get 750-800 fps stable on my setup and I'm not even using the lowest settings )
@@nichronos Also " nobody needs 1000hz display " is a crazy thing to say, if we go by that logic then none of us need a 144hz monitor either, or even a monitor at all lol? It isn't about what we literally " need " but it sure does make a massive difference and will make you better at the fps game you play, as long as you can hit your monitor's hz / fps ingame.
High motion clarity is very useful. I have 175 hz and 240 hz. I kinda hate playing in 175 hz on my Samsung G8 OLED. I constantly feel that "this is not quite it", because 240 hz feels better. I've also tried 360 hz and the perceived smoothless is next level. So 480 hz is something I may get.
@@pirx9798 u did not see u never know and u can not know u dont have 480 fps in games and u will not see difference mbr on or off. 240hz mbr on stable 240fps 480hz no need for stable fps u need VRR
Extremely basic video ignoring many of the features etc. But how big of an upgrade this is obviously depends on what you had previously. But at least mention OLED technology benefits, BFI 240hz etc?
so question i have a 7800x3d and a 4080 super. would it be worth going with this monitor or msi mag or mpg 2k 360 hz since right now its on sale for a little over 600?
Ok, so this channel is called "The Display Guy" and cant even talk about the difference response time between normal monitors IPS/TN vs OLED. Because this is the real deal with getting this OLED 480hz monitor, getting the excellent response time at any refresh rate. Also BFI at 240hz. What a waste of a video
Well yeah, the only way you're ever going to hit 480fps is either a very graphically simple esports game or the use of an interpolation technique like DLSS3. Remember, the higher the input framerate the higher the quality of the frame interpolation, and the less the hit to input latency becomes a problem. Something like Lossless Scaling at 4x with a native input frequency of 120fps, you are gonna get a very high quality image and the full advantage of a 480hz panel in terms of persistence blur. Hell, when you showed the 480hz UFO compared to the example, I agree it was extremely sharp, but you could still see some softness to the image compared to the example image. Such is just the limit of sample-and-hold displays.
1440p 480hz is a waste if the highest bandwidth port on the monitor, video cable, and graphics card port is either displayport 1.4 or hdmi 2.1, instead of displayport 2.1 which can natively support 1440p 480hz WITHOUT compression (display stream compression shouldn't be necessary or should it exist)
can't wait to get this currently on 1440p 360 Hz ulmb2 14900 ks @ 6.0/52r/46e /8600 MHz ddr5 will need better ram and cpu and GPU but man she's beautiful
Waiting for 1440p480 / 5k120 dual mode. The latter at 27 inch is a full retina display that throws apple studio display out of the window when it comes to non gaming use cases and the former, well, this.
The higher the refresh rate the better , you can use gysnc/freesync without locking the fps , because you wont get that fps in most games , so , I just hope for 500hz + monitors.
LS is just great if you have a game that can do 120 and do x4 it will be just smoother, is a win-win, but depending on the monitor, 4k 240hz will make more sense, than 1080p 480hz
I remember when I was one of the early adopters for 144hz monitors, and now I feel like im using ancient tech 😅 Just a little sad that monitors have become so extremely good, that you literally have to pay 1k+to get a good monitor without having the feeling you miss out on something
Is the BFI at 120hz or 240hz? flatpanelshd says 120hz, but tftcentral says up to 240hz. Also, i'm surprised that you didn't mention BFI in the video. That's a major selling point for me, as it doubles the clarity from 240hz to 480hz. I don't mind the reduction in brightness from BFI, at least on my LG C1.
you shouldn't think of latency only that way... there are a lot of other factors, huge differences between panels and monitors of the same refresh, the main difference is the number of images you can see in fast-paced scenarios, like panning the camera hard (and that in part is the blur issue you describe)
People think of Refresh & latency wrong. If your frametime is 3.2ms against a render latency of 3.8ms and you times that by 500 frames. You can see the accumulative effect is actually a lot bigger and why refresh rates matter. Yes motion clarity is better but also the perceived frame pacing. Humans can detect frame pacing up to about 600hz, tests have shown that there’s actually a large deviation in people’s resolution of motion.
There's also the monitor's latency, but OLEDs have this about as close to CRT as possible. I've measured a 360hz IPS display at 2.0ms of latency from signal to output.
you shoulda talked about its world first 240hz ELMB! achieving 480hz motion clarity while only requiring the gpu to output 240hz! Latency is still there but clarity is equivalent to a 480hz display
I hope ASUS reverses and allows HDR selection in its BFI mode. (This combination with RTX HDR on my LG C1 with its effective 312 Hz motion resolution is fantastic.) I know it reduces brightness. I don't care. ASUS please give us the choice.
Hard to achieve that fps in other game than cs and valorant. In bf2042 I have with 7800x3d and 4080 in 2k all on low around 260fps. Goes up over 300 sometimes but avg 260-270fps. Not even near 480 fps 😂 my total frame times in BF are around 2.8-3 ms and it’s on 240 hz OLED
as more of a competitive player, and I don't care about ultra wide or giant curved monitors and the price isn't that steep. I typically play on controller regardless of the game, so a 27" monitor is the perfect size, just a touch bigger than a 24" because I sit farther back in my chair. 480hz will be amazing for a high-end pc, and I plan on getting one of the new 50 series gpus with my 7800x3d, and it will have plenty of power in comp and casual games. W Oled is the best on the market and has the best response times by far with incredible visual quality. I will probably use this for years because I mean, it doesn't get much better once you hit 500hz. Maybe when 4k is the standard I will, but that will be some time yet.
Honestly I'm still down to buy it hopefully in the future that I would have put it in a 32in or 34in 6x10 display format not to mention it's a whole $300 cheaper then ASUS 4K 240hz 32 inch QD OLED monitor
can we do the UFO motion tracking test between a 500 hz 1080p monitor and the 1440p 480 hz monitor? This will test if Display Stream Compression is really affecting the performance Because at 500 hz 1080p displayport 1.4 cables should still be able to run that without stream compression, but 480 hz at 1440p will require stream compression with display port 1.4 I would like to see this test between 500 hz 1080p vs 480 hz 1440p UFO test to confirm how much DSC is affecting latency
thinking about buying this to go with my PG279Q 165hz 4ms as dual monitor setup at 2k 1440p resolution, will need to upgrade my system this winter probably to something like this to hit that : 9950x3d/5090/96gb ddr5 6000mhz cl30/Crucial T705... League of Legends and all the games will look so beautiful and fast I am just afraid a bit of work related task on this with burn in issues or text clarity, we will see once it release
A 1440p monitor definitely makes sense in 2024 as even a 4090 can't run the newest games in 4k native max settings and I doubt the 5090 will be able to either. So at the very least you would need to wait till RDNA 5 to run 4k maxed out and even that's doubtful.
Theoretical latency doesn't directly translate into real world latency. 60 fps doesn't result in a 16.7 ms latency, it's much higher. Same goes for the rest. So relative latency diff is the same, absolute latency diff is higher. That being said, motion clarity is the biggest winner here.
Yeah, 32" is just kinda too big. I'd also consider a 29"! A kind of sweet point where you get "big immersive single-player gaming" (e.g. Cyberpunk 2077), while still being able to easy push away the screen a bit and play e-sports.
I got my hands on the 580hz asus last year. I returned it due to not liking the TN panel. But holy… 580hz such an improvement over my 144hz it’s just something you gotta try for yourself. I was noticeably hitting more shots in games like valorant. I think a monitor like this 480hz oled is worth an upgrade if you’ve got the budget for it and you’re a highly skilled player who can benefit off of the extra frame rate to have an edge over others.
Well, no, not if you're an Overwatch 2 player or CS player. Depends on game. But let's say Cyberpunk 2077 with maxed out graphics at 480 FPS, yea gonna need at least 6090 or preferably 9090. But no one really needs that.
Exactly! QD beats w on colors accuracy, brightness (generally all OLEDs' main weakness) and semi-glossy is better for using it in luminous situationships. Only thing is that contrast (roughly the same) is worse in QD when using in bright rooms. If you play in dark rooms with no lights or very low lighting QD is the better option hands down.
I believe the best way to notice improvement from higher refresh rate is not when upgrading, but when downgrading. I bet that if someone used this 480Hz for a month and then went back to say 240Hz then they would notice the difference right away. Noticing the difference going up from 240Hz is likely much smaller.
probebly never not for oled atleast since the demand for 4k is mostly in 32 icn and higher the demand for 4k 27 inch is basicly none existence almost yes its a demand there but its small compare to does that want 4k 32 inch and ofc make what has most demand so the demand for 4k 27 inch oled need to increase first before they make 1and sorry for my english
Why not make your own superior video instead of anklebiting the author of a video you don't like. You're effectively just generating more traffic for him and helping him grow, lol.
@@fjorddenierbear4832 who said I don’t like him? Being honest and making a suggestion is completely normal. Giving him engagement will be great for him as well. Calm down guy, not every less positive comment means not liking the content creator.
I bought a 4k240 QD-OLED monitor because every dual mode monitor is only WOLED ,QD-OLEDs have more vibrant colours, and that's more important to me than 2ms less in response times. My next upgrade will be something like 4k 540hz OLED. The technology advances so quickly, I bet 2 years, and we will see something like that.
What's the point? Most modern games struggle to hit 60fps at 4k without upscaling and frame gen. There are 5k and 6k 60hz productivity monitors if you really want.
For 27" 1440p is plenty. People have been bamboozled by mobile phone manufacturers into thinking they need more than they really do. The biggest bottleneck for visual clarity is mastering of the content / detail level in games anyway.
$999 is unimaginably cheap for what you get. A decade ago a 1440p 140hz monitor was 2 grand. I'm hoping Samsung comes out with an updated version of the 57" 7680x2160, if they do that'll probably be the next screen I buy.
27" 4K oled with lg oled glossy "features" maybe premium glass? only one is available and its dough and not 4K(and still not available anywhere). when you see difference in PPI 27" is the best size. i dont want to wait till 2026 for a monitor like this to arrive.
@@naan9522 ive seen 1440p 32 vs 27. still prefer the 32. ppi only matters if your reading the whole time. and i dont want the performance hit of 4k against my 4080...
In anything higher hertz, will be better. It seems you did not understand the laws of the Universe! Like 98% of this lost world. 1000hz will be better in anything that you do on a screen. 10.000 even more. 100.000 even more, infinite, MORE!!!!
@@archiver22 It's smoother but just barely and not as noticeable as going from 60 to 120. It won't make you play any better and It's not worth the performance requirement. Unless you like to waste money on "smoothness" then keep chasing the hertz, maybe one day you play fornite or whatever at 1000hz and it'll feel soooo smoooth...
120Hz is still just a fraction of what is needed to approximate the analog wave forms human vision expects. Hence the blur. Though I agree massive improvements are already seen well short of 1000Hz.
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Buy the ASUS 480Hz OLED: Coming Soon
Buy the ASUS 4K 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/3yqKCak
Buy the ASUS "Glossy" OLED: amzn.to/4fTbala
What's the name of the song you're using in the background ?
I listened to almost every titles of david cutter and can't find it.
A 6 minute video with basically nothing useful said. BFI not even mentioned.
Cause it’s a paid ad and he’s trying to just push the video out
@@BeegBeegYoshi.because he is a clic*bai*y duche
I own multiple Asus OLEDs and they're not bad.
PG32UCDM is my best so far.
I also have the AQDM, and considering the AQDP.
let me guess somebody's gonna cry about matte coating let's see
Surprisingly not this time lmao
Wait this monitor has a matte coating?? Nah I'm good 🤮🤮🤮
I do, I'd definitely get that monitor but matte is a bummer
In this comment section? That's like 95% of people here.
@@pirx9798 i mean that's fine i'd probably love glossy too if ever tried one but the way this guy talks about it like all matte monitors should be set on fire
how come you didnt mention the 240hz BFI ? at this refresh rate u will be able to enjoy a astonishing motion clarity with a much more acceptable perfomance cost... at least for me that's the big news about this new monitor
Yes, but typically brightness greatly suffers which is already a problem for OLED.
@@thedisplayguy to me i dont see it as that big of an issue, the games that would benefit from constant 240 above are esports games that are still demanding or limiting enough to not reach the 480. that would be say quake, apex etc can use the bfi mode
and then for aaa titles where you dont reach 240 or games where you can reach 480 like ow, valo etc you can just leave it normal and let gsync help in the variable frames and enable the vrr flicker setting to resolve the issue
and once we go to media consumption we could again keep it normal mode for brightness, and i doubt for apex and quake we need any hdr or brightness to play it.
@@thedisplayguy Which is why 240hz BFI is great news, because you decrease the length of time (the pulse width) in which the black frame is displayed. This benefits brightness greatly. Like a camera shutter but instead your emitting light, not capturing it.
I still have several CRTs on which that test UFO looks completely clear. However, I do find the LG CX and C1 with their 312 Hz motion clarity due to their BFI equivalent (i.e., rolling scan) to already be compelling. A dream monitor really. I think this is because 312 Hz equivalent motion is already enough to bring us from the blur that still is 120 Hz to a place where the image is really starting to resolve. (E.g., can make out on the UFO a solid control stick, defined lines, even I think that there's 3 eyes.) It's just already a night and day difference.
Given how BFI works, would it enable OLEDs to crank their lit frames brighter to offset the black frames' hit to brightness? Ideally, the black frames would also be cooling down the OLED.
Guys we are almost half way to that 1000hz displays! The OLED monitor space is making big advancements in very little time. Hopefully brands continue to push limits further and not slow down.
@@nichronos it’s right around the corner, and yes that hardware does exist, just not to the general public
@@nichronos You are lost, I get stable 1k fps on h2m ( mwr mod client on pc ) at 1440p extra, same goes with any other old cod client. 400 fps on MW2023 at 1440p low/normal. RTX 4080, Ryzen 7 7800x3d. You are clueless if you think we can't hit 1000 fps in games we play the most, including older cod clients, cs2 ( I get 750-800 fps stable on my setup and I'm not even using the lowest settings )
@@nichronos Also " nobody needs 1000hz display " is a crazy thing to say, if we go by that logic then none of us need a 144hz monitor either, or even a monitor at all lol? It isn't about what we literally " need " but it sure does make a massive difference and will make you better at the fps game you play, as long as you can hit your monitor's hz / fps ingame.
High motion clarity is very useful.
I have 175 hz and 240 hz. I kinda hate playing in 175 hz on my Samsung G8 OLED.
I constantly feel that "this is not quite it", because 240 hz feels better.
I've also tried 360 hz and the perceived smoothless is next level.
So 480 hz is something I may get.
it's only worth it if all you do is play online shooters. I only play campaign games so I value graphics more thus why I game on a FO32U2P.
As demanding as 480Hz is, the good thing is you can fall back to 240Hz BFI with a hit to brightness.
Indeed, and 240 Hz with BFI looks as clear as 480 Hz without
@@pirx9798 u did not see u never know and u can not know u dont have 480 fps in games and u will not see difference mbr on or off. 240hz mbr on stable 240fps 480hz no need for stable fps u need VRR
Makeshift learn english before you tell me what to do 😠
I don't think this monitor supports 240Hz BFI, I think it's only 120Hz BFI?
@@arthur78 Where did you get that info lol, it 100% supports 240Hz BFI
Extremely basic video ignoring many of the features etc. But how big of an upgrade this is obviously depends on what you had previously. But at least mention OLED technology benefits, BFI 240hz etc?
I'm in doubt between Asus XG27AQDMG or LG 27GS95QE or Samsung G60SD, someone can help me?
so question i have a 7800x3d and a 4080 super. would it be worth going with this monitor or msi mag or mpg 2k 360 hz since right now its on sale for a little over 600?
Ok, so this channel is called "The Display Guy" and cant even talk about the difference response time between normal monitors IPS/TN vs OLED. Because this is the real deal with getting this OLED 480hz monitor, getting the excellent response time at any refresh rate. Also BFI at 240hz. What a waste of a video
Well yeah, the only way you're ever going to hit 480fps is either a very graphically simple esports game or the use of an interpolation technique like DLSS3. Remember, the higher the input framerate the higher the quality of the frame interpolation, and the less the hit to input latency becomes a problem. Something like Lossless Scaling at 4x with a native input frequency of 120fps, you are gonna get a very high quality image and the full advantage of a 480hz panel in terms of persistence blur. Hell, when you showed the 480hz UFO compared to the example, I agree it was extremely sharp, but you could still see some softness to the image compared to the example image. Such is just the limit of sample-and-hold displays.
i mean the monitor is made for esports gamers not AAA single player gamers
il put it like this everyone that see 480 hz shoud understand its for esports gamers becouse you dont need 480 hz for single player games
1440p 480hz is a waste if the highest bandwidth port on the monitor, video cable, and graphics card port is either displayport 1.4 or hdmi 2.1, instead of displayport 2.1 which can natively support 1440p 480hz WITHOUT compression (display stream compression shouldn't be necessary or should it exist)
can't wait to get this
currently on 1440p 360 Hz ulmb2
14900 ks @ 6.0/52r/46e /8600 MHz ddr5
will need better ram and cpu and GPU but man she's beautiful
Waiting for 1440p480 / 5k120 dual mode.
The latter at 27 inch is a full retina display that throws apple studio display out of the window when it comes to non gaming use cases and the former, well, this.
The higher the refresh rate the better , you can use gysnc/freesync without locking the fps , because you wont get that fps in most games , so , I just hope for 500hz + monitors.
What do you think about lossless scaling 120x4 fos with this? Pointless?
LS is just great if you have a game that can do 120 and do x4 it will be just smoother, is a win-win, but depending on the monitor, 4k 240hz will make more sense, than 1080p 480hz
Please notice me senpai: try Lossless Scaling Frame Generation (in performance mode) with this monitor!
I remember when I was one of the early adopters for 144hz monitors, and now I feel like im using ancient tech 😅
Just a little sad that monitors have become so extremely good, that you literally have to pay 1k+to get a good monitor without having the feeling you miss out on something
When will 4k 480hz oled come?
2 years atleast.
Unless your trying to play at high competitive level on low demanding games, 480hz makes sence. But for high demanding games 240hz is more than enough
Is the BFI at 120hz or 240hz?
flatpanelshd says 120hz, but tftcentral says up to 240hz.
Also, i'm surprised that you didn't mention BFI in the video. That's a major selling point for me, as it doubles the clarity from 240hz to 480hz. I don't mind the reduction in brightness from BFI, at least on my LG C1.
you shouldn't think of latency only that way... there are a lot of other factors, huge differences between panels and monitors of the same refresh, the main difference is the number of images you can see in fast-paced scenarios, like panning the camera hard (and that in part is the blur issue you describe)
BFI at 240Hz is the real killer feature, the clarity at that still insanely competitive framerate is what got me to buy one asap
What is this game at 1 m 14 sec ?
People think of Refresh & latency wrong. If your frametime is 3.2ms against a render latency of 3.8ms and you times that by 500 frames. You can see the accumulative effect is actually a lot bigger and why refresh rates matter. Yes motion clarity is better but also the perceived frame pacing. Humans can detect frame pacing up to about 600hz, tests have shown that there’s actually a large deviation in people’s resolution of motion.
There's also the monitor's latency, but OLEDs have this about as close to CRT as possible. I've measured a 360hz IPS display at 2.0ms of latency from signal to output.
240hx with black frame insertion got me looking
you shoulda talked about its world first 240hz ELMB! achieving 480hz motion clarity while only requiring the gpu to output 240hz! Latency is still there but clarity is equivalent to a 480hz display
I hope ASUS reverses and allows HDR selection in its BFI mode. (This combination with RTX HDR on my LG C1 with its effective 312 Hz motion resolution is fantastic.) I know it reduces brightness. I don't care. ASUS please give us the choice.
Seems like black frame insertion at 240hz on this monitor would be very useful. Some games only play at 240 and many you can’t reach over 240.
Hard to achieve that fps in other game than cs and valorant. In bf2042 I have with 7800x3d and 4080 in 2k all on low around 260fps. Goes up over 300 sometimes but avg 260-270fps. Not even near 480 fps 😂 my total frame times in BF are around 2.8-3 ms and it’s on 240 hz OLED
as more of a competitive player, and I don't care about ultra wide or giant curved monitors and the price isn't that steep. I typically play on controller regardless of the game, so a 27" monitor is the perfect size, just a touch bigger than a 24" because I sit farther back in my chair. 480hz will be amazing for a high-end pc, and I plan on getting one of the new 50 series gpus with my 7800x3d, and it will have plenty of power in comp and casual games. W Oled is the best on the market and has the best response times by far with incredible visual quality. I will probably use this for years because I mean, it doesn't get much better once you hit 500hz. Maybe when 4k is the standard I will, but that will be some time yet.
Honestly I'm still down to buy it hopefully in the future that I would have put it in a 32in or 34in 6x10 display format not to mention it's a whole $300 cheaper then ASUS 4K 240hz 32 inch QD OLED monitor
can we do the UFO motion tracking test between a 500 hz 1080p monitor and the 1440p 480 hz monitor? This will test if Display Stream Compression is really affecting the performance
Because at 500 hz 1080p displayport 1.4 cables should still be able to run that without stream compression, but 480 hz at 1440p will require stream compression with display port 1.4
I would like to see this test between 500 hz 1080p vs 480 hz 1440p UFO test to confirm how much DSC is affecting latency
Atm you can get an LG monitor with Oled, wqhd 240hz for 600€.
Million times better deal.
thinking about buying this to go with my PG279Q 165hz 4ms as dual monitor setup at 2k 1440p resolution, will need to upgrade my system this winter probably to something like this to hit that : 9950x3d/5090/96gb ddr5 6000mhz cl30/Crucial T705... League of Legends and all the games will look so beautiful and fast I am just afraid a bit of work related task on this with burn in issues or text clarity, we will see once it release
... NO! Even if you have the high-end hardware optimized for a single instance to make this happen... what are we talking about here?
A 1440p monitor definitely makes sense in 2024 as even a 4090 can't run the newest games in 4k native max settings and I doubt the 5090 will be able to either. So at the very least you would need to wait till RDNA 5 to run 4k maxed out and even that's doubtful.
Theoretical latency doesn't directly translate into real world latency. 60 fps doesn't result in a 16.7 ms latency, it's much higher. Same goes for the rest. So relative latency diff is the same, absolute latency diff is higher. That being said, motion clarity is the biggest winner here.
I need the 4k version but In 27” 😢😩
Yeah, 32" is just kinda too big. I'd also consider a 29"!
A kind of sweet point where you get "big immersive single-player gaming" (e.g. Cyberpunk 2077), while still being able to easy push away the screen a bit and play e-sports.
“Best Motion clarity of any monitor money can buy?” What about CRT?
Please recommend some 1080p monitor (GLOSSY)
Still waiting on that LG 45" 5k ultrawide OLED...
How do I access the discord? I’m part of the Patreon
I love the fact that it has RGWB for the text clarity, but not glossy, if it was would be an insta cop
I got my hands on the 580hz asus last year. I returned it due to not liking the TN panel. But holy… 580hz such an improvement over my 144hz it’s just something you gotta try for yourself. I was noticeably hitting more shots in games like valorant. I think a monitor like this 480hz oled is worth an upgrade if you’ve got the budget for it and you’re a highly skilled player who can benefit off of the extra frame rate to have an edge over others.
There is no 580Hz, yet. There are 540Hz options.
@@Raivo_K Mb typo
So if I’m on a lower end of I benefit nothing right ?
just saw an asus coverage of gamescom where they said that it will bei 1300€ in europe XD good luck on the shelves with that one
It's 1100 €, already available for pre-order.
it is a waste, because it is dp 1.4
480hz requires a Rtx 6090 and a Amd 10800 x3d
11800x3d*
Well, no, not if you're an Overwatch 2 player or CS player.
Depends on game.
But let's say Cyberpunk 2077 with maxed out graphics at 480 FPS, yea gonna need at least 6090 or preferably 9090.
But no one really needs that.
do we know if this beast has sharpness setting?
What’s better: ASUS’s glossy WOLED or semi glossy QD-OLED?
Semi glossy qd oled
Exactly! QD beats w on colors accuracy, brightness (generally all OLEDs' main weakness) and semi-glossy is better for using it in luminous situationships.
Only thing is that contrast (roughly the same) is worse in QD when using in bright rooms. If you play in dark rooms with no lights or very low lighting QD is the better option hands down.
Mines arrived today!
I think I need at least 7800x3d for that 480+ fps
Most decent desktops can hit 480+ in Overwatch 2 and CS.
Even my laptop can do that.
But for many games I would not even try to reach 480.
THIS IS ENDGAME
gsync pulsar?
Click bait
I believe the best way to notice improvement from higher refresh rate is not when upgrading, but when downgrading. I bet that if someone used this 480Hz for a month and then went back to say 240Hz then they would notice the difference right away. Noticing the difference going up from 240Hz is likely much smaller.
When 4K 27 inch 360 hz ??
probebly never not for oled atleast since the demand for 4k is mostly in 32 icn and higher the demand for 4k 27 inch is basicly none existence almost yes its a demand there but its small compare to does that want 4k 32 inch and ofc make what has most demand so the demand for 4k 27 inch oled need to increase first before they make 1and sorry for my english
you would not touch 360hz on 4k, for atleast 2 next generations of gpu
What game is that at 1:20?
The Finals
How much is it?
A grant
32" 4K @480 Hz is no longer a dream?! Tell this in coming next!
3 years from now.
Is this a WOLED or QD OLED?
WOLED.
Not bad!
This was a waste of time. 6 minutes of nothingness, in a new monitor video. This should be a separate video altogether.
Why not make your own superior video instead of anklebiting the author of a video you don't like. You're effectively just generating more traffic for him and helping him grow, lol.
@@fjorddenierbear4832 who said I don’t like him? Being honest and making a suggestion is completely normal. Giving him engagement will be great for him as well. Calm down guy, not every less positive comment means not liking the content creator.
I bought a 4k240 QD-OLED monitor because every dual mode monitor is only WOLED ,QD-OLEDs have more vibrant colours, and that's more important to me than 2ms less in response times. My next upgrade will be something like 4k 540hz OLED. The technology advances so quickly, I bet 2 years, and we will see something like that.
I'd like a 29" 4K 540 hz OLED :) End-game.
no review of the pg27aqdp
badseed tech has
Just more low resolution monitors. When are we going to see 5k and above?
What's the point? Most modern games struggle to hit 60fps at 4k without upscaling and frame gen. There are 5k and 6k 60hz productivity monitors if you really want.
For 27" 1440p is plenty. People have been bamboozled by mobile phone manufacturers into thinking they need more than they really do. The biggest bottleneck for visual clarity is mastering of the content / detail level in games anyway.
One of my fav channels at the moment ngl. Heavily informative but not too verbose. Perfection
$999 is unimaginably cheap for what you get. A decade ago a 1440p 140hz monitor was 2 grand.
I'm hoping Samsung comes out with an updated version of the 57" 7680x2160, if they do that'll probably be the next screen I buy.
Wonder if this screen can run custom res 2304x1440 at 480hz 🤔
Do you think samsung g8 ultrawide from 2022 is still viable at 500$?
The g8 oled came out in 2023 ? But 500$ for it is a very low price
@@znoozaros afaik it came out in late 2022, but still I was worried about the magenta blacks
@@catalyst9568 hey it's not perfect but it's still a perfectly viable and excellent monitor!
This guy always finds something to cry about.
Look idk if you know but every marketing agent said more big number equal more better.
waiting for them 32" 1440p oleds
I play COD competitive. Would you suggest the MSI MAG 321UPX or the MSI MPG 271QRX??
321 is 32” 4k 240Hz
271 is 27” 1440p 360Hz
27" 4K oled with lg oled glossy "features" maybe premium glass? only one is available and its dough and not 4K(and still not available anywhere). when you see difference in PPI 27" is the best size. i dont want to wait till 2026 for a monitor like this to arrive.
@@naan9522 ive seen 1440p 32 vs 27. still prefer the 32. ppi only matters if your reading the whole time. and i dont want the performance hit of 4k against my 4080...
120hz is fine, motion clarity only comes into play when your whipping your mouse around in a game. In non esports games its a waste.
In anything higher hertz, will be better. It seems you did not understand the laws of the Universe! Like 98% of this lost world. 1000hz will be better in anything that you do on a screen. 10.000 even more. 100.000 even more, infinite, MORE!!!!
its smoother also, nearly the same jump as it was from 60hz to 120hz
They said the same about 30hz once upon a time. Tech moves on.
@@archiver22 It's smoother but just barely and not as noticeable as going from 60 to 120. It won't make you play any better and It's not worth the performance requirement. Unless you like to waste money on "smoothness" then keep chasing the hertz, maybe one day you play fornite or whatever at 1000hz and it'll feel soooo smoooth...
120Hz is still just a fraction of what is needed to approximate the analog wave forms human vision expects. Hence the blur. Though I agree massive improvements are already seen well short of 1000Hz.
I’m struggling to get anything like 4k/240 with my rtx 4090, I even overclocked my i7 2600k to 5ghz, so i preordered the 5090 from an ebay seller
That's a joke, right? Your CPU sounds ancient!
Shouldn't you get a 7800X3D before going for 5090?
2k OLED is a waste on it’s own
for you :)
no?
Wouldn’t go that far. It’s good for esport-centric gamers
I only game at 480hz 4k Monitor scaled down to 720p 45hz. On a Intel itanium cpu with onboard graphics going through no less than 5 adapters.
How? It sells better than 4K OLED monitors.