Thank you for your passion. It’s going to take this level of passion to change our way of living so that we can preserve the earth, our health and our futures. God bless you, Dr. McDougall and Mary. We love you thank you, thank you thank you.
I can remember 70 years ago in N. Florida we set fires almost every year because we knew what would happen if we didn't. The fuel available for wildfires was kept to a minimum. Now, government entities have, for the most part, has taken control of that activity, and you see the result. That practice, by the way, started centuries ago, and had nothing to do with climate. Just an observation.
The levels of droughts, freak floods, and frequency of wildfires happening worldwide far exceed what was the case 70 years ago. Statistically, they can't and haven't been accounted for by arson either, in case that comes to mind. Controlled burns (or not) to prevent larger wildfires also don't account for the substantial increase either. Extreme weather events are increasing, and the climate and environment are responding to our interference is the statistical probability. We both know it. Mental gymnastics doesn't and won't change that, I'm afraid.
Did you see th videos of power line poles from Aug 8th? Reminded me of PG and E in CA. I still think you cannot rule out arson. The idea of blocking out sunlight! We have had that already, it was a huge volcano around 1816? A terrible idea.
@@pantameowmeow.s.1149 definitely not ruling out arson attacks, as per Hawaii at this stage - but statistically, again arson does not account for the increases in frequency of worldwide wildfires. And it's not blocking out sunlight that is the MEER proposal. It's reflecting it back into space, via widespread specialist mirror deployment across land areas.
@@mcm7518 with respect, kindly take a look at worldwide statistics, and come back to me. Climate deniers have historically tried to cherry pick and disregard widespread data they find inconvenient, as you are likely aware. I don't claim that reduction in controlled brush burns might not have an impact, including in the US, as Heller highlights. There are combinationa of factors in most things. But to put that as the sole factor is stretching credibility past breaking point. As the people of Northwest Canada may also argue, and the people of Australia, and the people of Southern Europe... I could go on.
Love your ever present passion for health of people and planet, your wisdom and knowledge. I agree you and your wife are a great team. The term vegan I understand is now less popular than whole food plant based diet. Please don’t give up on us🙏🍀💚
Another good night with the McDougall's.....good info continues which is appreciated. The Meer Solar Framework Management needs to continue to spread worldwide.....just the same as the Starch Solution for sure. Lives need to be saved....we need our homes. Hawaii is 1 of my happiest places to vacation. Prayers go out to all that are affected 🙏
Very sad about the fires. You SCARED me Dr. McDougall. My A1C is 5. You say 6 is too low! No, I am not on medication. Thank you for adding you are speaking about people who are on medication for glucose.
You may want to listen to Dr. McDougall again on 6% being to low. I think he is saying those who have diabetes and on medication, that 6% is to low. The Doctors can, WITH MEDICATION, get your numbers to the low numbers. That is when people die because of stroke and heart attacks.
Interesting stuff on Me’er, worth investigating. BTW, just FYI, Dr. David Sinclair is co-director of the Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging at Harvard, best known for his work on genes that delay aging (bio from his book).
Dr mc McDougall I love your video about all dairy,chicken fish eggs milk and so on being African and knowing man has been changing the molecular of almost everything on the planet I think starch binds up the system it is carbonic acid don't the body need alkaline foods, sits electrical
I live in the UK & here all GPs have to attend regular training updates. I know nothing about medicine in the US but surely your doctors have the same or better ?
They do have to attend continuing progessional development updates (CPD) , but nutrition doesn't necessarily have to be part of those updates. And if it is, you're almost guaranteed for it to be not whole food plant based education still.
I am not celiac but I don't eat gluten. However, I am very B12 deficient according to the lab blood test results. If it's unlikely for us to become deficient, then should I trust the blood test results? What level of serum B12 is REALLY optimal?
@@adiohead Yes that would be the next step, but I am wondering if the medically accepted "range" for "normal" is accurate because Dr. McDougall says that it's unlikely for someone to become B12 deficient and that it takes 30 years... Also I have no symptoms! It was a random finding. I've had repeat tests 6-7 times now to monitor.
i have high blood pressure of 180/90 or sometimes up to 200/ 90. I am ideal weight for my height dont drink alcohol or smoke.Take excerise every day, eat salads for lunch, have seeds and nuts with kefir milk for breakfast. But blood pressure wont go down, Am on Amlodipine 10mg and coversyl 10mg every day, What do i do next to lower the blood pressure
That's a good question. I'd like to know. I get white coat in office. Blood pressure was 150/82. Took again at end of appointment and it was 128/78. At home it's usually always low. Sometimes 98/65. I was prescribed 5mg of amlodipine at one time. I stoo taking it n tried to change diet. Although my cholesterol went down n now they saying I need to go on Statins. Far as I'm concerned if I had to make a choice, I'd rather be on amlodipine than the darn statins. I might look into taking nattinokinase to help lower ldl
If you have some kind of leaky gut, and or allergy/sensitivity that could be one possible cause (back and lower torso are obviously close to the intestines here). There's obviously alternatives to oats and different starch sources are available. Mary's Mini (see McDougall website and Newsletters) might be the smart way to go here. Falling that, medical examination and/or a medically supervised fast. Medical examination might be worthwhile anyway, just to rule out any obvious physical cause. Might also want to try organic grains - some people have reactions to glyphosates used on spraying oats and other grains, and have reported relief through going organic. Good luck.
Maybe because all grains these days are crossed hybrids which give bigger yeilds. This increases gluten content as well because their are more chromosomes in wheat than a hundred years ago. Then there's added herbacides/pesticides which can change your microbiome and cause leaky gut due to the shikamite pathway being affected by the glyphosate in 'Round up' that is sprayed on all our plants. Oats have a high concentration of glyphosate.
Dr. McDougal, it looks as if you've put on a little weight - especially on your face. It looks really good. You look much younger. Did you purposely put weight on?
I said he is having some meat on the side, because I knotice how his face have filled out. He must have had some steak and salmon in Hawaii. I mentioned it but no reply. He looks younger
A lot of scientists have other opinions about climate change. It is important to keep the planet clean but there needs to be more scientific evidence by different brilliant scientists to support the climate change phenomenon. Unfortunately this has been a political issue for many years. Hopefully many other scientists will get the opportunity to speak about this issue.
I think it’s clear that there is no “climate change” in the sense of the agenda, they want the public to believe however, our ionosphere is changing drastically and temperatures are warming because of the exponential leave huge increase in non-native earmuffs, which are microwaves.. we are living in a big microwave and if you look at the burn patterns of these supposed wildfires, that’s exactly what you see metal that is melting, while The trees are standing and burning from the inside out! We need more sun and natural light!
@@retrospiel Where is your evidence that the writer does "not know or care about existing data". That is another emotional, non fact based statement, because you have no idea; and is typical of those promoting an agenda; not those advancing scientific debate. The earth has been around for a long time, and has undergone many cycles of change and there are forces much more power than you , or I , or some cows.
@@scoobydadog246 because science does not care for opinions. Neither mine, nor yours, nor that of "a lot of" scientists. Data is just data, you can't argue with data.
@@retrospiel Oh my dog.. don't get me started. Yes, you can argue with data, and yes; you should! Well, perhaps not argue, but certainly question. Certainly for anything published after the 70s. One huge issue is that 99% of the public does not go look at the original data - actually read papers, attend conferences (where you have a lot of sharing), contact real experts, etc. etc. That is a big problem b/c ppl often get their 'data/info' from a third hand source. I see this constantly, and for just about any topic. Some loose online site will post an article about a study, and it will have a dramatic headline .. here's a real life example I came across. "Dogs given mushroom supplement for Cancer live longer and have slower tumor growth". I'm paraphrasing of course, but that was the gist. The writer then goes on to say that according to said study, a certain dose (the highest) worked the best. It all sounds very wonderful, and they reference a University study; and a particular brand for the supplement (which is very expensive). I then see this info repeated and circulating through the webosphere by bloggers and into every 'dog' website, and even places related to veterinary services - which gives it credibility. Just basically a copy of the original writer's interpretation - a writer who did not understand the study at all (and probably didn't really read it). First thing I do is go to the original paper. I found: 1. this was a pilot study that looked at 12 dogs 2. 4 - only 4, in 3 groups, each given a different dose 3. NO CONTROL group - that is huge, so you have no idea if any did better than if nothing was given! That is a big red flag and if you read pharma funded studies, you need to be careful to look for that. .. which brings up a most imp point - always follow the money. Who funded it. In this case - it was the company that made the mushroom supplement. Go figure. And - if you really looked at the data - you would see that while they reported average life span, they were all over the place. The dog that lived the longest had the lowest dose, there was a dog in the hi dose group that died right away. i.e. what they didn't report was the standard deviation , and the range. - your average might be 10, but you can get that from 11 & 12; or 0 and 20. Anyway, bottom line when you really looked at the study all you could really say was that "maybe this would help" and the lower dose (much less $) could be just as effective". so there was promise, but it needed further study - and a much larger study group. Which is the purpose of pilot studies - to see if something was worth studying, not give answers. So - it is magnified with an issue like "climate" - which is driven by political and other agendas. You have the media and politicians and so many confounding factors that you really have to dig deep to get at the truth. Which is always less exciting and dramatic those trying to profit off of it will make it seem. "Science" is not a person that cares or not. I don't like to use that word in today's climate b/c it has been so weaponized. Of course you should have an opinion. Just be willing to change it as you learn more information. That is wisdom.
The MEER website is easy enough to look up in internet search. I think they said it would be in the chat sidebar (that's only visible though I the livestream), so it might not be below the video.
Well, the most effective propaganda seems to have been that climate change isn't happening, and/or that humans aren't responsible for it. That, sadly, has been very effective in telling people what they want to hear, and still is.
It is! I am sad to see Dr. McDougall falling for this - because he was such a staunch advocate, for truth against the medical tyranny, and the pharmaceutical companies, who basically own the planet. Now technocracy is taking over control, and he is doing exactly what all of the people he has fought against do - accepting an official narrative without questioning it, when it is obviously problematic!
@@scoobydadog246 Very sad to see indeed. If only Dr McDougall would realise that there are people on this planet that are more resourced and more diabolical than the food industry behind this hoax.
Pi understand what you mean...but pls don't NOT listen to the rest of the talk...as usual Dr McDougall gives great helpful info again...especially love his description of the difference bw the 3 types of diabetes.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for your passion. It’s going to take this level of passion to change our way of living so that we can preserve the earth, our health and our futures. God bless you, Dr. McDougall and Mary. We love you thank you, thank you thank you.
I can remember 70 years ago in N. Florida we set fires almost every year because we knew what would happen if we didn't. The fuel available for wildfires was kept to a minimum. Now, government entities have, for the most part, has taken control of that activity, and you see the result. That practice, by the way, started centuries ago, and had nothing to do with climate. Just an observation.
The levels of droughts, freak floods, and frequency of wildfires happening worldwide far exceed what was the case 70 years ago. Statistically, they can't and haven't been accounted for by arson either, in case that comes to mind.
Controlled burns (or not) to prevent larger wildfires also don't account for the substantial increase either.
Extreme weather events are increasing, and the climate and environment are responding to our interference is the statistical probability. We both know it.
Mental gymnastics doesn't and won't change that, I'm afraid.
Did you see th videos of power line poles from Aug 8th? Reminded me of PG and E in CA. I still think you cannot rule out arson.
The idea of blocking out sunlight! We have had that already, it was a huge volcano around 1816? A terrible idea.
@@pantameowmeow.s.1149 definitely not ruling out arson attacks, as per Hawaii at this stage - but statistically, again arson does not account for the increases in frequency of worldwide wildfires.
And it's not blocking out sunlight that is the MEER proposal. It's reflecting it back into space, via widespread specialist mirror deployment across land areas.
I just said that we reduced fuel, plain and simple, without regard to any discussion about climate whatsoever. There's no mental gymnastic in that.
@@mcm7518 with respect, kindly take a look at worldwide statistics, and come back to me.
Climate deniers have historically tried to cherry pick and disregard widespread data they find inconvenient, as you are likely aware.
I don't claim that reduction in controlled brush burns might not have an impact, including in the US, as Heller highlights. There are combinationa of factors in most things. But to put that as the sole factor is stretching credibility past breaking point.
As the people of Northwest Canada may also argue, and the people of Australia, and the people of Southern Europe... I could go on.
A very important and moving message. And we love what you've added to the Hawaiian Islands on your wall. ❤
Great stuff. Thank you for the time stamps so useful.
Love your ever present passion for health of people and planet, your wisdom and knowledge. I agree you and your wife are a great team. The term vegan I understand is now less popular than whole food plant based diet. Please don’t give up on us🙏🍀💚
So wonderful to hear directly from the man who is behind this great plan. You have saved my life.
Wow, Dr McDougall, you are beautiful and thank you so much for all the informations you sharing with us. Liane from Québec, Canada.
Thank you for talking about this❤heart breaking about Maui😢
A subject list, optimally with time stamps in the description or pinned comment, would help with such long vids
Great information! Thanks for sharing.😊
Another good night with the McDougall's.....good info continues which is appreciated. The Meer Solar Framework Management needs to continue to spread worldwide.....just the same as the Starch Solution for sure. Lives need to be saved....we need our homes.
Hawaii is 1 of my happiest places to vacation. Prayers go out to all that are affected 🙏
Oh my soul... Dr McDougall looks 10 years younger. Look at his perfect skin!
Thank you for this video, I’m enjoying your book
Taylor Swift could easy afford to pay for the entire MEER project. She's generous with her money.
Sorry I missed this live!
Eat for FUEL, not for FUN.
Another great night with the McDougalls!
Oh my lord, I got chills when you told me about escaping from the fire that destroyed your home, in light of wht we have seen in Lahaina!
Very sad about the fires.
You SCARED me Dr. McDougall. My A1C is 5. You say 6 is too low! No, I am not on medication. Thank you for adding you are speaking about people who are on medication for glucose.
You may want to listen to Dr. McDougall again on 6% being to low. I think he is saying those who have diabetes and on medication, that 6% is to low. The Doctors can, WITH MEDICATION, get your numbers to the low numbers. That is when people die because of stroke and heart attacks.
I love when Dr M says "none" 😂😂
Has anyone heard if Dr Shintani is ok?
Mirrors reflecting sun light into space? Sounds like a solid plan with no down side, lol.
Right. What about air traffic being affected by all the reflected light/heat? And cloud formation, etc
Interesting stuff on Me’er, worth investigating. BTW, just FYI, Dr. David Sinclair is co-director of the Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging at Harvard, best known for his work on genes that delay aging (bio from his book).
Recently diagnosed with essential tremors. Does anything make it worse or lessen it? Caffeine? Alcohol? I am plant-based.
Dr mc McDougall I love your video about all dairy,chicken fish eggs milk and so on being African and knowing man has been changing the molecular of almost everything on the planet I think starch binds up the system it is carbonic acid don't the body need alkaline foods, sits electrical
Could you let me know about Plant based diet with interststional cysts.
This is brilliant! We can't get people to change their ways, so mirrors!!! What a great idea!
I live in the UK & here all GPs have to attend regular training updates. I know nothing about medicine in the US but surely your doctors have the same or better ?
They do have to attend continuing progessional development updates (CPD) , but nutrition doesn't necessarily have to be part of those updates. And if it is, you're almost guaranteed for it to be not whole food plant based education still.
I am not celiac but I don't eat gluten. However, I am very B12 deficient according to the lab blood test results. If it's unlikely for us to become deficient, then should I trust the blood test results? What level of serum B12 is REALLY optimal?
Get some decent b12 supplements. There's some that contain 3 different forms.
You can also get an injection if your levels are that low.
@@adiohead Yes that would be the next step, but I am wondering if the medically accepted "range" for "normal" is accurate because Dr. McDougall says that it's unlikely for someone to become B12 deficient and that it takes 30 years... Also I have no symptoms! It was a random finding. I've had repeat tests 6-7 times now to monitor.
@@evec2022 In the past he used to say 3 years, not 30, but he always recommended taking a supplement.
David Sinclair is a live extension researcher.
i have high blood pressure of 180/90 or sometimes up to 200/ 90. I am ideal weight for my height dont drink alcohol or smoke.Take excerise every day, eat salads for lunch, have seeds and nuts with kefir milk for breakfast. But blood pressure wont go down, Am on Amlodipine 10mg and coversyl 10mg every day, What do i do next to lower the blood pressure
That's a good question. I'd like to know. I get white coat in office. Blood pressure was 150/82. Took again at end of appointment and it was 128/78. At home it's usually always low. Sometimes 98/65. I was prescribed 5mg of amlodipine at one time. I stoo taking it n tried to change diet. Although my cholesterol went down n now they saying I need to go on Statins. Far as I'm concerned if I had to make a choice, I'd rather be on amlodipine than the darn statins. I might look into taking nattinokinase to help lower ldl
I like the beard!
Good
💥💥💥💯
Why do I get stabbing back pain when I eat grains? Oats especially and usually within the hour...
If you have some kind of leaky gut, and or allergy/sensitivity that could be one possible cause (back and lower torso are obviously close to the intestines here).
There's obviously alternatives to oats and different starch sources are available. Mary's Mini (see McDougall website and Newsletters) might be the smart way to go here.
Falling that, medical examination and/or a medically supervised fast. Medical examination might be worthwhile anyway, just to rule out any obvious physical cause.
Might also want to try organic grains - some people have reactions to glyphosates used on spraying oats and other grains, and have reported relief through going organic.
Good luck.
Maybe because all grains these days are crossed hybrids which give bigger yeilds. This increases gluten content as well because their are more chromosomes in wheat than a hundred years ago. Then there's added herbacides/pesticides which can change your microbiome and cause leaky gut due to the shikamite pathway being affected by the glyphosate in 'Round up' that is sprayed on all our plants. Oats have a high concentration of glyphosate.
Dr. McDougal, it looks as if you've put on a little weight - especially on your face. It looks really good. You look much younger. Did you purposely put weight on?
I said he is having some meat on the side, because I knotice how his face have filled out. He must have had some steak and salmon in Hawaii.
I mentioned it but no reply. He looks younger
He doesn't eat animal products for health and environmental reasons. He was eating nuts to add weight previously
@@sandray7609 well as some one who eats 300 grams of almonds a day, I don't know because I have no weight gain, but it's ok
He and Mary have a trainer for exercise. Don't know, but I think that has helped.
@@station247365 Interesting - I thought they were just doing their daily walks
global warming hoax is a scam but the diet stuff is interesting
Wow! With all the "solutions" how to "save our planet" we definitely this planet destroy!
The brown sugar islands turned into ashes.
A lot of scientists have other opinions about climate change. It is important to keep the planet clean but there needs to be more scientific evidence by different brilliant scientists to support the climate change phenomenon. Unfortunately this has been a political issue for many years. Hopefully many other scientists will get the opportunity to speak about this issue.
You just do not know or care for the existing data.
I think it’s clear that there is no “climate change” in the sense of the agenda, they want the public to believe however, our ionosphere is changing drastically and temperatures are warming because of the exponential leave huge increase in non-native earmuffs, which are microwaves.. we are living in a big microwave and if you look at the burn patterns of these supposed wildfires, that’s exactly what you see metal that is melting, while The trees are standing and burning from the inside out! We need more sun and natural light!
@@retrospiel Where is your evidence that the writer does "not know or care about existing data". That is another emotional, non fact based statement, because you have no idea; and is typical of those promoting an agenda; not those advancing scientific debate. The earth has been around for a long time, and has undergone many cycles of change and there are forces much more power than you , or I , or some cows.
@@scoobydadog246 because science does not care for opinions. Neither mine, nor yours, nor that of "a lot of" scientists. Data is just data, you can't argue with data.
@@retrospiel Oh my dog.. don't get me started. Yes, you can argue with data, and yes; you should! Well, perhaps not argue, but certainly question. Certainly for anything published after the 70s. One huge issue is that 99% of the public does not go look at the original data - actually read papers, attend conferences (where you have a lot of sharing), contact real experts, etc. etc. That is a big problem b/c ppl often get their 'data/info' from a third hand source. I see this constantly, and for just about any topic. Some loose online site will post an article about a study, and it will have a dramatic headline .. here's a real life example I came across. "Dogs given mushroom supplement for Cancer live longer and have slower tumor growth". I'm paraphrasing of course, but that was the gist. The writer then goes on to say that according to said study, a certain dose (the highest) worked the best. It all sounds very wonderful, and they reference a University study; and a particular brand for the supplement (which is very expensive). I then see this info repeated and circulating through the webosphere by bloggers and into every 'dog' website, and even places related to veterinary services - which gives it credibility. Just basically a copy of the original writer's interpretation - a writer who did not understand the study at all (and probably didn't really read it).
First thing I do is go to the original paper. I found: 1. this was a pilot study that looked at 12 dogs 2. 4 - only 4, in 3 groups, each given a different dose 3. NO CONTROL group - that is huge, so you have no idea if any did better than if nothing was given! That is a big red flag and if you read pharma funded studies, you need to be careful to look for that. .. which brings up a most imp point - always follow the money. Who funded it. In this case - it was the company that made the mushroom supplement. Go figure. And - if you really looked at the data - you would see that while they reported average life span, they were all over the place. The dog that lived the longest had the lowest dose, there was a dog in the hi dose group that died right away. i.e. what they didn't report was the standard deviation , and the range. - your average might be 10, but you can get that from 11 & 12; or 0 and 20. Anyway, bottom line when you really looked at the study all you could really say was that "maybe this would help" and the lower dose (much less $) could be just as effective". so there was promise, but it needed further study - and a much larger study group. Which is the purpose of pilot studies - to see if something was worth studying, not give answers.
So - it is magnified with an issue like "climate" - which is driven by political and other agendas. You have the media and politicians and so many confounding factors that you really have to dig deep to get at the truth. Which is always less exciting and dramatic those trying to profit off of it will make it seem.
"Science" is not a person that cares or not. I don't like to use that word in today's climate b/c it has been so weaponized. Of course you should have an opinion. Just be willing to change it as you learn more information. That is wisdom.
Where is the link to the video Dr McDougall showed in the beginning of the live lecture about Meer technology, mirrors reflecting heat off the planet?
The MEER website is easy enough to look up in internet search. I think they said it would be in the chat sidebar (that's only visible though I the livestream), so it might not be below the video.
LOL, I wish the doc would learn to spell saponification 😄
Eye witnesses/residents will tell you what happened. It is exactly what I thought.
David Sinclair, who?
😂😂😂
Maybe Open Sinclair..!!
Mcdougall doesn't give a shit about David Sinclair !
Oh please. This is ridiculous. I'm gone.
Closing 800 or 900 US bases would go a long way in helping the Earth, too.
Especially helping with peace.
Absolutely!@@Gieszkanne
When I saw the video I switched off. It reminds me of propaganda.
People using the word propaganda reminds me of wilful ignorance
Well, the most effective propaganda seems to have been that climate change isn't happening, and/or that humans aren't responsible for it.
That, sadly, has been very effective in telling people what they want to hear, and still is.
It is! I am sad to see Dr. McDougall falling for this - because he was such a staunch advocate, for truth against the medical tyranny, and the pharmaceutical companies, who basically own the planet. Now technocracy is taking over control, and he is doing exactly what all of the people he has fought against do - accepting an official narrative without questioning it, when it is obviously problematic!
@@scoobydadog246 Very sad to see indeed. If only Dr McDougall would realise that there are people on this planet that are more resourced and more diabolical than the food industry behind this hoax.
Pi understand what you mean...but pls don't NOT listen to the rest of the talk...as usual Dr McDougall gives great helpful info again...especially love his description of the difference bw the 3 types of diabetes.
What God have to say to these scientists are they hearing from God or they own intellectual apathy
Where is the link on global warming to share?