Bioenergetics Explained! (Glycolysis, Krebs Cycle, Oxidative Phosphorylation)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 132

  • @TheMovementSystem
    @TheMovementSystem  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you're studying for the CSCS Exam, make sure to join my study group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170

    • @dcdelacruise
      @dcdelacruise 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what about if i am studying for a physical instructor course exam? what would your suggestions be on me researching more?

  • @lindaw4534
    @lindaw4534 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    This is by far the most efficient and simple explanation I've seen on bioenergetics related to the NASM program. Thank you so much, I'm currently cramming for my exam in one month!

    • @mathematics5573
      @mathematics5573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Robot Kittyyy! Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

    • @jono1457-qd9ft
      @jono1457-qd9ft หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the ATP counts are wrong. ATP net from glycolysis is closer to 3 because it's mostly from muscle glycogen not blood glucose. Everyone gets this wrong.
      And the net ATP from mitochondrial respiration is around 30 ATP not 34

  • @Richacha.-.p
    @Richacha.-.p ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THIS IS LITERALLY SO HELPFUL, its the best way of explaining everything in detail but also in a short way

  • @edwardofrias8220
    @edwardofrias8220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    WOW! I feel like a boss right now. This material can be overwhelming, yet this breakdown has allowed me to see the light. You have shown me the way like David Goggins has. I wish you exponential success!! I appreciate you!!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow I’m going to call myself the David Goggins of bioenergetics now

  • @omeirbabi
    @omeirbabi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I am gonna take CSCS exam next month, i must tell you i was having a hard time getting clarity about glycolysis but your explanation nailed it ! Thank you for sharing it. God bless you bro 👍

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad it helped! Make sure you join the Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170/

    • @omeirbabi
      @omeirbabi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I already did that moment !

  • @khadijahanum8875
    @khadijahanum8875 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I WAS STUCK N REALLY NEVER STUDDIEDD AND UNDERSTOOD THIS CONCEPT EVERRR BUT THANKS TO YOUU. SOOO GOOD

  • @jefflamb2301
    @jefflamb2301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Man, Im doing my PT cert right now and wow.. thank you so much for being able to lay all this out. The text I have is really hard to digest compared to your explanation. Really man, thanks.

    • @Serenityi413
      @Serenityi413 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm doing mine right now, this was good.

  • @elliewilliams9015
    @elliewilliams9015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was explained so well and was much easier to understand than my lecturer's powerpoint. Thank you so much!!

  • @alyssayoung.2494
    @alyssayoung.2494 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1st year med student here, this video is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ayushibandyopadhyay1766
    @ayushibandyopadhyay1766 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have my University entrance exam in two days... No one has taught Kreb's cycle this smoothly ever to me.. This video was really useful.. Thank you 🙏

  • @melissadrake4339
    @melissadrake4339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm going through nasm for my cpt. I just now started learning this stuff and was soooo confused! This helps me out so much! Thank you!

  • @tishazabin3974
    @tishazabin3974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The way you explained the whole process is just amazing. I was struggling so much. Thank you! 💕

  • @frajill4397
    @frajill4397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I MISS THE NORMAL DAYS. I DON'T LIKE DOING DISCUSSIONS ONLINE, BUT WATCHING YOUR VIDEOS MOTIVATES ME.

  • @von-marieoliva4827
    @von-marieoliva4827 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This completely simplified the topic for me! Thank you for sharing!

  • @mikelowrey1172
    @mikelowrey1172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a better teacher than my professor!

  • @houmous942
    @houmous942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Nice video overall, but there’s a mistake. When pyruvate is decarboxylated into acetylCoA, there is no O2 coming in to bind to C and form CO2. The CO2, i.e. COO, is simply the carboxylic function (COOH) that came from the pyruvate. However you didn’t mention the CoA that comes in at that step to form acetylCoA. O2 only comes into play at the end of the electron transport chain.

    • @LifewithAmairanny
      @LifewithAmairanny 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ugh now im scared to watch the video if its wrong

  • @sarahtakash1
    @sarahtakash1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this! You're really helping me with my NSCA studying!

  • @laddo666
    @laddo666 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video. I love how you explained it. I subscribed. Thanks.

  • @21Bommi1
    @21Bommi1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very much useful. Explanation and providing attention by deeply pronouncing few terms was really good 👍 Thank you

  • @thephysioscarerapist
    @thephysioscarerapist ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this... I understand this completely now

  • @kcrehkopf
    @kcrehkopf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    om gosh you are so helpful--great concise explanation--plus super easy on the eyes

  • @mjwinterbottom9131
    @mjwinterbottom9131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You made this super easy! Thank you so much! :D

  • @tevii_mahnmegao6145
    @tevii_mahnmegao6145 ปีที่แล้ว

    THAT REALLY HELPED ME. WOW, GREAT JOB.

  • @doraorban3598
    @doraorban3598 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're a very good teacher!

  • @lissetealopezmunguia250
    @lissetealopezmunguia250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well explained! Thanks!

  • @Serenityi413
    @Serenityi413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much! Simply put!

  • @rene7391
    @rene7391 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful simplified explanation 👏 thanks

  • @Gar136
    @Gar136 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Matt!! I’m currently studying for Nasm-cpt certification and this video helped me out a lot thank you!

  • @kyarrajackson5207
    @kyarrajackson5207 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was the best explanation!

  • @1ukasvn
    @1ukasvn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks so much for the clear explanation, you just got a new subscriber! your videos are cool !

  • @arielmejia4743
    @arielmejia4743 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for the great explanation/breakdown! ✨

  • @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624
    @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANKS MAN! I really like this. Very helpful

  • @harsimarsingh3514
    @harsimarsingh3514 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Helping me as always. Thanks alot

  • @harshdinodiya8509
    @harshdinodiya8509 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice its so easy now .. thanks

  • @namulindwavictoria7213
    @namulindwavictoria7213 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, thanks so much. Well explained

  • @nawannabaz3092
    @nawannabaz3092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was fantastic man 👌

  • @Coach_ahmedflefl
    @Coach_ahmedflefl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easy demonstration. Thank you

  • @pjcarfagno6412
    @pjcarfagno6412 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful and easy to follow

  • @mcvheartsjdb
    @mcvheartsjdb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you! This was awesome.

  • @paiger9559
    @paiger9559 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So helpful! Thanks!

  • @nataliea149
    @nataliea149 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Matt! Are you a wizard? Just watched your vids lately and I was thinking to myself "maybe you should ask him to make a bioenergetics vid". lol thank you so much! :)

  • @gavhlev2853
    @gavhlev2853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome!

  • @LakeySmith
    @LakeySmith 7 นาทีที่ผ่านมา

    Where did the 3 and 2 come from that was multiplied before getting the 30 and 4 ATP?

  • @TheYogiworld
    @TheYogiworld 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice...👌

  • @lenajajo2168
    @lenajajo2168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    can you please explain why you are multipling the 10 nadh by three ? and 2 fadhd by 2 ?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When those substrates are oxidized in oxidative phosphorylation that’s how many ATP they produce

  • @eldiego5101
    @eldiego5101 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good topic exlanation

  • @questionme9327
    @questionme9327 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    form 4:30 onwards i just became completely lost. I dont understand the NADH bit and how it correlates to the krebs cycle. And the atp part, 2 extras form glycolysis amd the timsing by 3 to make 30 atp doesnt make sense to me either. Can someone recommems a video to help break this part down. tyy :)

    • @questionme9327
      @questionme9327 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      just watched ur other video breaking it down and i understand it a bit better now thankyou :D

  • @ashiqamhmd2107
    @ashiqamhmd2107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the best explanation vedio i have ever seen...thankyou so much sirr🫠🫠🫠❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

  • @Inyakopon
    @Inyakopon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks sensei

  • @runjoshrun7237
    @runjoshrun7237 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do questions on something like this require absolute recall of all these molecules and complete process or just being familiar with it at a higher level?

  • @abubzk
    @abubzk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks

  • @saahilshaik9024
    @saahilshaik9024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    im a little bit confused. you said that glycolysis doesn't need oxygen. but you wrote above the diagram "aerobic glycolysis" and said that if you didn't have oxygen, you would get lactate.

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. The process of glycolysis is occurring in the cytoplasm without oxygen. It's what happens after glycolysis that determines if it's aerobic or anaerobic. So if after glycolysis is done there is room in the mitochondria for the pyruvate to be metabolized the process is considered aerobic glycolysis and the pyruvate moves onto the Krebs cycle. If there is not oxygen in the mitochondria then the pyruvate will turn into lactate. That is termed anaerobic glycolysis. The terminology is confusing because in both cases the process of glycolysis didn't require oxygen.

  • @tedmed7349
    @tedmed7349 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't see the forest for the trees are blocking my sight. So what is good or bad and what should we do about it.

  • @aquakatrin1332
    @aquakatrin1332 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you ❤️

  • @KitchenwithAdeela321
    @KitchenwithAdeela321 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing

  • @johntruong4227
    @johntruong4227 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU!!!!

  • @kitsono8745
    @kitsono8745 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't the first part of the Krebs cycle known as the Links reaction ? Thank you for your explanation!!! it was super helpful

  • @strokesfield
    @strokesfield 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm confused. My textbook says that a net yield of 32 ATP is given "from energy transfer during the complete oxidation of one glucose molecule in glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and electron transport."
    What am I missing here?

  • @heavenlybreeze
    @heavenlybreeze 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro! You're goood!

  • @truth6565
    @truth6565 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey man, just want you to know
    THIS WAS A GOOD VIDEO
    Probably can always get better but this was very good and I’m here totally randomly and a huge critic lol
    In case it helps to know; I Randomly found this searching up “bio energy” which is some jokey new age health nut shit I watched “Philion” make fun of

  • @johndemwell6022
    @johndemwell6022 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How many ATP does aerobic and anaerobic respiration produce?

  • @guchi8884
    @guchi8884 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is the electron chain transport a part of this?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s another name for oxidative phosphorylation

  • @leytonpyett3572
    @leytonpyett3572 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So you get 2 NADH from aerobic glycolsis. 2 NADH x 3 = 6 ATP. If it costs 2 then shouldn't the NET be 4?

  • @-KARMA482
    @-KARMA482 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dont see where the 4 NADHs are in the end of the krebs cycle

  • @varunjirali9272
    @varunjirali9272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can u explain me about what happens if there are more pfk..?

  • @harrisonsmith8616
    @harrisonsmith8616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very useful video, but everywhere I look it shows that only 32 ATP comes from 1 glucose.

  • @madisonhagen7133
    @madisonhagen7133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    did you mean to say anaerobic glycolysis instead of aerobic glycolysis (because you said the aerobic glycolysis doesn't need O2 but the definition of aerobic says it requires O2 and anaerobic doesn't require O2???

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Neither require oxygen actually. These are both done in the cytoplasm without oxygen. Aerobic glycolysis just indicates that once split, the pyruvate will continue on to the mitochondria and use oxygen to break down more in the Krebs cycle. Anaerobic indicates that the pyruvate will turn into lactate.

    • @madisonhagen7133
      @madisonhagen7133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheMovementSystem Thank you so much for the explanation. That makes so much more sense now!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@madisonhagen7133 You're welcome!

  • @Goldo1968
    @Goldo1968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same for lypolisis pls?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here’s my video lipolysis vs. beta oxidation: m.th-cam.com/video/0EUslLbIkXo/w-d-xo.html&feature=emb_logo

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    if I was marking an exam on the Krebs cycle, he had done, if he had written this, I would fail him.

  • @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx
    @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone want to check my work?
    For a 16 chain fatty acid you will make 129ATP.
    Is that correct?

  • @strongbodystrongmiind
    @strongbodystrongmiind 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    how is 4x2 equaling 10?? Am i misinterpreting a step or something?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What part of the video are you referring to?

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Movement System the end where you multiple 4 by 2 for ATP

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@strongbodystrongmiind I'm still not sure what you mean. It's 34 from Oxidative phosphorylation + 2 from Glycolysis + 2 from Krebs cycle = 38

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Movement System ok you have
      4NADH x 2 = 10....

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Movement System ahhhhh never mind.... u explained it at 5:28 mark :))

  • @davidlandy4514
    @davidlandy4514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    isnt there 2.5 ATP per NADH not 3?

  • @lovethememory
    @lovethememory 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @caesarerelmacahilig2611
    @caesarerelmacahilig2611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Elliott Hulse brought me here

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

    • @Akash-ep8yx
      @Akash-ep8yx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is explaining bioenergetics , not creb cycle

  • @MichaelTurany-p9x
    @MichaelTurany-p9x หลายเดือนก่อน

    So basically what you're saying The chalice with the palace holds the brew that is true th-cam.com/video/TJ9f2rnjB84/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NUn54b3lCOkCu6r0

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ang hirap

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    pinagsasabi neto