When I was in my late teens (mid-90s) a guy I knew was OBSESSED with making a movie of The Silver Key. And I mean obsessed to the point of dressing like (how he imagined) Lovecraft would have, always having 5 notebooks filled with notes for his movie. He eventually shot something on what is genuinely to this day the worst camcorder I’ve ever seen, low definition doesn’t even come close to how bad it was. Once he edited it all together he realised that he had less than ten minutes of usable footage with no comprehendible audio. It was crap, awful, but weirdly it came out as something that really was weirdly Lovecraftian; just not how it was intended. I bring this up because I kind of feel that this movie is very similar to what he would’ve ended up with if he’d tried to fix it with padding, filters, and bloom.
What a disappointment! The Thing on the Doorstep is one of my favourite Lovecraft stories, to learn that a movie was made, AND it was terrible all in one swoop... what a roller coaster. Good review, as always, though!
Honestly you are one of my favourite review channels, especially how you focus on horror, because if you I've really gotten into H.P Lovecraft style horror movies.
Not entirely sure if it's intended, with how poorly this movie is shot (and how overlit and washed out it usually is) but they really nail off kilter lighting in some scenes, adding sometimes subtle otherworldly tones. Asenath descending the staircase drew my eye to it, her shadow just seems /off/ despite having no actual fx work. I think.
I'm not the only one who finds the original story kind of sad, right? We see how Lovecraft Stories are scary everywhere else, but here, it almost feels like a tragedy. We have to see a long painful decline of a young man through the eyes of his best friend and know where it will end. I think that this is why this is a good story.
I've been going through your Lovecraft playlist, watching the movie and yhrn your review. But this one...yeah. I made it to the wedding party before I Noped out and just came here. Glad I wasn't mistaken.
At first I was hesitant to watch this, since I've been intending to watch the movie. However, now I'm glad I did; seems like I dodged a bullet. Low budget/indie-quality movies can still be scary and/or entertaining, but a lack of skill and/or effort is always apparent, regardless of budget.
Thank you for being so accessible to your followers and for giving us another HP Lovecraft month. Your show is one of my favorites. If you ever come to Maine for a Stephen King tour, drinks are on me.
I've started to read Lovecraft. Actually because of your videos on the movies based on them. I haven't got to this one but I think it's one of my favorite reviews from you.
Always love your reviews! One thing I have to say about this one, though... Usually you focus your gaze directly into the camera. It gives a very realistic feeling that you're talking to the audience. In this review, though, you're glancing to the left of the screen (right side of the camera from your perspective). It totally changes the dynamic. It made it feel like you're not aware of the audience watching, and are instead talking to someone off screen in the same room. Just figured I'd mention it. Really hoping you're covering Color Out of Space this Lovecraft Month! It's my favorite of his stories and I loved the movie.
That shouldn't surprise anyone, though. Asylum and Troma are film companies with access to expensive cameras, lighting & audio equipment, unsuccessful but at least semi-competent actors/directors (with movie experience)...and...actual budget. This movie was made with barely if any budget, cheap cameras, no microphones or professional lamps...and... *amateur* actors/directors exclusively.
Dawg I've been watching your stuff for a while an I gotta say you keep putting out some consistent badass content and I always pop up with excitement seeing a new vid
@@deusdeaconReviews Understood. I was just curious since it's one of my favorite adaptations in terms of atmosphere, even if the plot's focused more on LBGT issues. Cheers for the response. Love your reviews.
I watched this on amazon and, as someone who absolutely adores Lovecraft, I wanted to love it. However, I just couldn't sit through the whole thing. Not horrible, just painfully flawed.
Given what Lovecraft was going through around the time he wrote this story, I like to joke that its working title was "No I'm not still Bitter About the Divorce Guys Why do you ask?"
I personally couldn’t find much saying the marriage/divorce was anything particularly bitter, after all they didn’t actually get divorced the papers weren’t filed, so it cant have been that much of an emotional time.
It was interesting since I knew the Lovecraft stories, but I would not think any average horror movie fan could find much in it. Honestly I did wonder if many people unfamiliar with the story or Lovecraft would come of of it really knowing what was going on in the movie.
I watched this movie a while ago, just because it was a Lovecraft movie and all I ever really remember is that 1. I didn't really like it, and 2. the creators really wanted to make sure we knew this was a Lovecraft movie. I was going to rewatch the movie before watching the review but I just couldn't get into it again. In retrospect I wish I had just reread the original story. I enjoyed the review much more than I ever did the movie.
I agree that some H.P. Lovecraft stories can only work in the 1920s, but a few stories could work in modern times if the director did their research on the story right, like Color out of Space, the Resurrected, or From Beyond, even though that story had been expanded past it's seven page limit.
oh yeah don’t get me wrong with this i was only talking about this story specifically, A lot of the stories can be modernised with very minimal effort, but this kind of story needed a lot of skill to do right which clearly wasn’t there.
@@deusdeaconReviews I agree. This really did feel cheap, rushed, and edited badly, and that's nothing against the budget, just with the direction and style choices, 'cause yeah, others *can* do a better job with a minimum budget if they do it right. Just look at Robert Rodriguez.
I'm curious what the next review is going to be. We can tell from clips that you will review Color Out Of Space, but that is a direct adaptation of a story so it can't be the "not an adaptation but an expansion of the mythos".
I still think there's such a thing as too accurate for adaptations. Film and books are different mediums, And not everything works going between them. It's essentially an art in itself in knowing what to keep and what to cut, and what to change to make a film adaptation work. See Jurassic Park. Movie totally different from the novel in a lot of ways, but I love both
Speaking of Lovecraftian movies that are not adaptations, I'd recommend Cthulhu (2007 or 2008, I can never remember). The director actually put the whole thing up here on TH-cam for free and heartily endorses you watching it as such.
cthulhu is an adaption, albeit a rather loose one, but an adaption none the less of shadow over innsmouth, which is one of the reason I haven’t looked at it because I looked at Dagon which is the same thing, and adaptions of shadow over innsmouth are far too common.
Great review, as usual! Why not set the film in the 1920's, where it would make far more sense??? Simply put, they didn't want to spend the money/time on set design. The set-houses look like rented air bnb's or, the old stand by, a house of one of the directors/producers. This is far worse than a student film. Really sad as they seemed to want to do the source material justice. But then again, good writing and set design takes care and cash. Neither of which are apparent in this production.
I wonder if you plan to cover Lovecraft Country? I ask because I notice some plot points that were familiar like Heirem, Immortality, and Body Switching. In the show they are Braithwhites and I only assume the language was language of Adam (called in the show)
I think this story can work in modern day just needs some small rewrites. Such as the police do come over but they simply don’t find anything. Just tiny stuff like that.
A shame this movie turned out this way, I know Poe isn’t love craft but this kind of reminds me of a film that just came out based on the house of usher called the bloodhound which takes place in modern day but it still makes the story work., The bloodhound also has the advantage of being only an hour and 11 minutes as well it’s still keep the tone and ideas of the original story but it just happens to take place in modern day.
remake of Call of Cthulhu next week.................im kinda looking forward to it. That particular film is one that im gonna have to overcome a personal bias and actually watch...................
@@deusdeaconReviews i guess 're-imagining' is a better way to put it, but a remote operation that awakens Cthulhu by accident and attempts to kill him at the end is similar enough that I consider it to be an attempt to "modernize" the story with cool concepts like changing the location of R'lyeh from a remote island to the deepest ocean floors.
Again gonna have to disagree, its a story with cthulhu in it thats it, no one is trying to summon cthulhu in the story all the accounts we see are reaction to him waking up naturally, yes cthulhu is “killed” at the end of both, but thats simply not enough, theres also no smaller creatures killing people in the story, the film doesnt have a depiction of ryleh at all as well it does a disservice to the film to label it as a (whatever the word being used) “recreation”.
@@deusdeaconReviews you're probably right. Ill admit that seeing Kristen Stewart as the lead actress made me write it off without seeing it. my understanding was just that it included Cthulhu attacking the deep sea mining platforms and an attempt (most likely unsuccessful attempt) to kill him at the end. I consider it to be themes from the original story, but maybe had too much production troubles to do it properly. either way though, i have no doubt in my mind that your review of it will be illuminating and entertaining like all your work has been!
The Camera-Man on this crapload of a movie thought "well, my camera angles are shit... let's just make it worse by cranking up the contrast to 100%, blowing out the highlights and shadows... this will make it look 'artsy' "
I haven't watched this one yet and I'm already in a lake of boredom from the film. Yeah it sounds like they should've done more work on it and set it during the 1920's.
The Thing on the Doorstep is actually my favorite Lovecraft story. It executes the ''is the man insane or is the horror real?'' concept the best. Like wise it might be the only Lovecraft story that has some decent characters since most of them are really bland.
I don't know what filter they used to give everything that ethereal sort of effect, but it looks like garbage. Which is fitting, from the sounds of things.
What do you like to be called? Regardless my dude, I feel as if with this budget, 1920s is not happening. The cars alone are a fortune this movie is not going to spend. Still a good point though.
After watching almost the entirety of this series, I just realised the intro song you use for Lovecraft Month is a rendition of Kyrie Eleison. Its a little odd to see a song, I as a Catholic, sing almost every Sunday accompanied with Lovecraft imagery. Great review, though!
Well yes the song is that too, but it’s mainly being its used because its from my favourite lovecraftian video game, and its used there as a kinda of malevolent inversion (my interpretation) so I wanted to do that for these reviews
almost every shot in the house look like the house or backround it self is green screen to me. maybe it just the coloring or somthing but it look like bad assyalm cgi for a room
The film's colour grading, bloom filter and overexposure is so horrendously eye-straining that I've had to retreat down to the comment section and listen to the last 14 minutes of the review.
this looks like my parents and their suburban group of friends decided to make a lovecraft movie in one weekend for some reason
on a flip phone
As always, a truly splendid review! Can't wait for your review of The Colour Out Of Space.
Nor can I. "The Color Out of Space" was such an amazing movie
He did a great job on that too
Your Lovecraft related reviews are one of my most favorite content on YT. Thank you!
When I was in my late teens (mid-90s) a guy I knew was OBSESSED with making a movie of The Silver Key. And I mean obsessed to the point of dressing like (how he imagined) Lovecraft would have, always having 5 notebooks filled with notes for his movie. He eventually shot something on what is genuinely to this day the worst camcorder I’ve ever seen, low definition doesn’t even come close to how bad it was. Once he edited it all together he realised that he had less than ten minutes of usable footage with no comprehendible audio.
It was crap, awful, but weirdly it came out as something that really was weirdly Lovecraftian; just not how it was intended. I bring this up because I kind of feel that this movie is very similar to what he would’ve ended up with if he’d tried to fix it with padding, filters, and bloom.
What a disappointment! The Thing on the Doorstep is one of my favourite Lovecraft stories, to learn that a movie was made, AND it was terrible all in one swoop... what a roller coaster. Good review, as always, though!
Honestly you are one of my favourite review channels, especially how you focus on horror, because if you I've really gotten into H.P Lovecraft style horror movies.
Gosh, I hope you keep doing movie reviews! you're great!
Not entirely sure if it's intended, with how poorly this movie is shot (and how overlit and washed out it usually is) but they really nail off kilter lighting in some scenes, adding sometimes subtle otherworldly tones. Asenath descending the staircase drew my eye to it, her shadow just seems /off/ despite having no actual fx work. I think.
I'm not the only one who finds the original story kind of sad, right? We see how Lovecraft Stories are scary everywhere else, but here, it almost feels like a tragedy. We have to see a long painful decline of a young man through the eyes of his best friend and know where it will end. I think that this is why this is a good story.
Cheers dude thanks!
I've been going through your Lovecraft playlist, watching the movie and yhrn your review. But this one...yeah. I made it to the wedding party before I Noped out and just came here. Glad I wasn't mistaken.
At first I was hesitant to watch this, since I've been intending to watch the movie. However, now I'm glad I did; seems like I dodged a bullet. Low budget/indie-quality movies can still be scary and/or entertaining, but a lack of skill and/or effort is always apparent, regardless of budget.
I have missed new videos on this channel. It has been way to long, glad your back!
by the nine, this movie looks like a homemovie from 2007 youtube
The thing on the doorstep has by far the most bad ass opening line I've ever read in a short story.
Happy to see another video from you. Always enjoy them.
Thank you for being so accessible to your followers and for giving us another HP Lovecraft month. Your show is one of my favorites. If you ever come to Maine for a Stephen King tour, drinks are on me.
Ah I love me some lovecraft shenanigans in the morning. Thank you Deusdaecon for giving me a better morning fix than lukewarm breakroom coffee.
good to have you back man
I've started to read Lovecraft.
Actually because of your videos on the movies based on them.
I haven't got to this one but I think it's one of my favorite reviews from you.
Loving the Quara-beard! So happy its Lovecraft month! Been waiting for these reviews all year.
There's a really good German adaptation of The Color Out of Space called Die Farbe. I highly recommend it if you don't mind subtitles.
Good to see you back man!! Always look forward to your videos!!
UNDERWATA!! PUSHIN DOWN ON ME!! PUSHING DOWN ON YOU! Oh wait there’s cuthlu
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 I love waking up to this!!!! Thank you for all that you do!!!!
HP Lovecraft month! Yay! Glad to see more of your work :)
Always love your reviews! One thing I have to say about this one, though... Usually you focus your gaze directly into the camera. It gives a very realistic feeling that you're talking to the audience. In this review, though, you're glancing to the left of the screen (right side of the camera from your perspective). It totally changes the dynamic. It made it feel like you're not aware of the audience watching, and are instead talking to someone off screen in the same room. Just figured I'd mention it. Really hoping you're covering Color Out of Space this Lovecraft Month! It's my favorite of his stories and I loved the movie.
This looks cheaper than any Asylum or Troma movie I've seen.
You take that back!
No one is cheaper than Troma.
No one!
@@tsinestexicthdauwraum9082 🤣🤣🤣
That shouldn't surprise anyone, though.
Asylum and Troma are film companies with access to expensive cameras, lighting & audio equipment, unsuccessful but at least semi-competent actors/directors (with movie experience)...and...actual budget.
This movie was made with barely if any budget, cheap cameras, no microphones or professional lamps...and... *amateur* actors/directors exclusively.
@@tsinestexicthdauwraum9082 I'm almost surprised that Lloyd Kaufman himself didn't make this comment. XD
@@michaelwilson5114 I did hear the idea in his voice.
God damn, send the photographer back to class.! There's this thing called ISO that's photography 101.
A great review Dues
I really like all of your reviews.
Another quality video, Deus! I absolutely love(craft) it.
I'll see myself out...
Why is everything, in this movie, so yellow? And the day lights are shining too bright.
Someone pissed into the filters.
@@DinoDave150 That might have just improved the film.
Insightful and enjoyable review as always mate, also the comb over suits you.
Omg one of my favorite stories 😍
You know, A series faithfully adapting various lovecraft stories in like 1.5hour episodes would be lit
Dawg I've been watching your stuff for a while an I gotta say you keep putting out some consistent badass content and I always pop up with excitement seeing a new vid
12k views in 4 days already, damn! Well deserved my friend! 💯
Still waiting on a review of 2007's Cthulhu, but thanks for warning me off this one so fervently.
I doubt ill review that one anytime soon, cause its just shadow over innsmouth again with minor changes, that stories been done to death.
@@deusdeaconReviews Understood. I was just curious since it's one of my favorite adaptations in terms of atmosphere, even if the plot's focused more on LBGT issues. Cheers for the response. Love your reviews.
I watched this on amazon and, as someone who absolutely adores Lovecraft, I wanted to love it. However, I just couldn't sit through the whole thing. Not horrible, just painfully flawed.
Hooray!!! Enjoyed the video
17:56 lol that unintended runny rose.
Given what Lovecraft was going through around the time he wrote this story, I like to joke that its working title was "No I'm not still Bitter About the Divorce Guys Why do you ask?"
I personally couldn’t find much saying the marriage/divorce was anything particularly bitter, after all they didn’t actually get divorced the papers weren’t filed, so it cant have been that much of an emotional time.
When papa bear uploads a video. Baby bears gonna watch. Thank you for the video Chief
It was interesting since I knew the Lovecraft stories, but I would not think any average horror movie fan could find much in it. Honestly I did wonder if many people unfamiliar with the story or Lovecraft would come of of it really knowing what was going on in the movie.
Oh how I’ve missed your videos!!!!
I watched this movie a while ago, just because it was a Lovecraft movie and all I ever really remember is that 1. I didn't really like it, and 2. the creators really wanted to make sure we knew this was a Lovecraft movie.
I was going to rewatch the movie before watching the review but I just couldn't get into it again. In retrospect I wish I had just reread the original story. I enjoyed the review much more than I ever did the movie.
I need to get more into Lovecraft.
Why is it so green and yellow. Oh my god. What even is this movie
Looks like someone peed on the film.
It's like we're back in the Matrix movies, except I'd really much like to see the tentacled monsters in those movies rather than this one.
It’s lemon/lime.
I listened to a TH-cam audiobook of this story a couple weeks ago
Whats that thing on the doorsteph... oh it's the script.
That movie make To Boldly Flee look like it had an actual budget
I love those reviews, you should review every single movie there is :) plenty to choose from
I agree that some H.P. Lovecraft stories can only work in the 1920s, but a few stories could work in modern times if the director did their research on the story right, like Color out of Space, the Resurrected, or From Beyond, even though that story had been expanded past it's seven page limit.
oh yeah don’t get me wrong with this i was only talking about this story specifically, A lot of the stories can be modernised with very minimal effort, but this kind of story needed a lot of skill to do right which clearly wasn’t there.
@@deusdeaconReviews I agree. This really did feel cheap, rushed, and edited badly, and that's nothing against the budget, just with the direction and style choices, 'cause yeah, others *can* do a better job with a minimum budget if they do it right. Just look at Robert Rodriguez.
I'm curious what the next review is going to be. We can tell from clips that you will review Color Out Of Space, but that is a direct adaptation of a story so it can't be the "not an adaptation but an expansion of the mythos".
Underwater
@@deusdeaconReviews Oh cool. I liked that movie.
I didn't realize they made a film out of this one.
I still think there's such a thing as too accurate for adaptations. Film and books are different mediums, And not everything works going between them. It's essentially an art in itself in knowing what to keep and what to cut, and what to change to make a film adaptation work. See Jurassic Park. Movie totally different from the novel in a lot of ways, but I love both
This story really doesn't work on a modern setting, so jarring
The death of Charles Dexter Ward could work with a modern setting, most the the"present day" stuff are in a hospital
“the case of Charles dexter ward” has already been modernised in the film the resurrected which I’ve also reviewed
You can tell its a bad movie when they dial up the bloom and slap on a filter on the entire movie.
Speaking of Lovecraftian movies that are not adaptations, I'd recommend Cthulhu (2007 or 2008, I can never remember). The director actually put the whole thing up here on TH-cam for free and heartily endorses you watching it as such.
cthulhu is an adaption, albeit a rather loose one, but an adaption none the less of shadow over innsmouth, which is one of the reason I haven’t looked at it because I looked at Dagon which is the same thing, and adaptions of shadow over innsmouth are far too common.
@@deusdeaconReviews I loved Dagon, but they are very different films in both theme and execution.
Yeah but it’s still an adaption of SoI and I’d rather look at something I haven’t talked about
Great review, as usual! Why not set the film in the 1920's, where it would make far more sense??? Simply put, they didn't want to spend the money/time on set design. The set-houses look like rented air bnb's or, the old stand by, a house of one of the directors/producers. This is far worse than a student film. Really sad as they seemed to want to do the source material justice. But then again, good writing and set design takes care and cash. Neither of which are apparent in this production.
For sure your the best u tuber on the PLANET Brother.....
Hi. Please check out The Endless or Blackmountain Side. Both could be called lovecraftian in their own twist and ideas.
the endless would need resolution first if i was ever going to look at that film
There is another version of this story filmed as well. Though it may be hard to find.
I wonder if you plan to cover Lovecraft Country? I ask because I notice some plot points that were familiar like Heirem, Immortality, and Body Switching. In the show they are Braithwhites and I only assume the language was language of Adam (called in the show)
Great Video. I would really like to know your thoughts on the movie version of "The whisperer in the dark".
i'm super digging the beard bro. good look.
Some Lovecraft stories can work in a modern setting. This is, not one of them.
And yeah, Asenath looks WAY too generic here.
I think this story can work in modern day just needs some small rewrites. Such as the police do come over but they simply don’t find anything. Just tiny stuff like that.
Quick everybody!!! HIT THAT LIKE!!!!
The weird soft focus and lighting in the house almost gives the impression of bad green screen.
Have you reviewed Cthulhu (2007)? I'd like to hear your thoughts on that one.
I didn't know this movie existed
sorry to ruin that for you
A shame this movie turned out this way, I know Poe isn’t love craft but this kind of reminds me of a film that just came out based on the house of usher called the bloodhound which takes place in modern day but it still makes the story work., The bloodhound also has the advantage of being only an hour and 11 minutes as well it’s still keep the tone and ideas of the original story but it just happens to take place in modern day.
remake of Call of Cthulhu next week.................im kinda looking forward to it. That particular film is one that im gonna have to overcome a personal bias and actually watch...................
I’m glad your looking forward to it, although i completely disagree its a call of Cthulhu remake
@@deusdeaconReviews i guess 're-imagining' is a better way to put it, but a remote operation that awakens Cthulhu by accident and attempts to kill him at the end is similar enough that I consider it to be an attempt to "modernize" the story with cool concepts like changing the location of R'lyeh from a remote island to the deepest ocean floors.
Again gonna have to disagree, its a story with cthulhu in it thats it, no one is trying to summon cthulhu in the story all the accounts we see are reaction to him waking up naturally, yes cthulhu is “killed” at the end of both, but thats simply not enough, theres also no smaller creatures killing people in the story, the film doesnt have a depiction of ryleh at all as well it does a disservice to the film to label it as a (whatever the word being used) “recreation”.
@@deusdeaconReviews you're probably right. Ill admit that seeing Kristen Stewart as the lead actress made me write it off without seeing it. my understanding was just that it included Cthulhu attacking the deep sea mining platforms and an attempt (most likely unsuccessful attempt) to kill him at the end. I consider it to be themes from the original story, but maybe had too much production troubles to do it properly.
either way though, i have no doubt in my mind that your review of it will be illuminating and entertaining like all your work has been!
I so glad i watched this before i wasted my time on the movie
I love H.P. Lovrcraft month.
The Camera-Man on this crapload of a movie thought "well, my camera angles are shit... let's just make it worse by cranking up the contrast to 100%, blowing out the highlights and shadows... this will make it look 'artsy' "
Just when I thought my day was good it became great. Great work mate. Want a cup'a?
I didn't know this was a movie. I think i will skip this one haha. Good vid bro.
27:00 Wasn't there another "Thing on the Doorstep" movie released in 2003?
I could only find the one, and frankly one was enough.
I haven't watched this one yet and I'm already in a lake of boredom from the film. Yeah it sounds like they should've done more work on it and set it during the 1920's.
I honestly have never heard of this film.
Kinda why I chose it because someone had to talk about it eventually.
@@deusdeaconReviews lol
The Thing on the Doorstep is actually my favorite Lovecraft story. It executes the ''is the man insane or is the horror real?'' concept the best. Like wise it might be the only Lovecraft story that has some decent characters since most of them are really bland.
Like and comment because i can't watch the whole thing because of spoilers omg i had no idea this film existed!!!! Ok brb
Maybe Derby doesn't want a shave and a haircut?
Hey I know it’s not your regular style but is it at all possible you do the carmilla web series’ first season
This movie is still better done than a movie just called things. Trust me after you watch even just a review on it.
This is the ugliest film I have ever witnessed with my own two eyes.
After last season is the ugliest trust me.
@@icommentoneverything7032 ohhh noooo 🙁
I don't know what filter they used to give everything that ethereal sort of effect, but it looks like garbage. Which is fitting, from the sounds of things.
Are we sure this movie isn't a porno I'm getting step bro vibes
What do you like to be called? Regardless my dude, I feel as if with this budget, 1920s is not happening. The cars alone are a fortune this movie is not going to spend. Still a good point though.
Your way funnier then ANYBODy who's mainstream!!
I’d really have to disagree with you, Although i do appreciate the compliment
Updating the setting of Lovecraft is rarely a good idea.
Please do The Void its so good.
and thus it magically is done, check the channels back catalogue
After watching almost the entirety of this series, I just realised the intro song you use for Lovecraft Month is a rendition of Kyrie Eleison. Its a little odd to see a song, I as a Catholic, sing almost every Sunday accompanied with Lovecraft imagery. Great review, though!
Well yes the song is that too, but it’s mainly being its used because its from my favourite lovecraftian video game, and its used there as a kinda of malevolent inversion (my interpretation) so I wanted to do that for these reviews
almost every shot in the house look like the house or backround it self is green screen to me. maybe it just the coloring or somthing but it look like bad assyalm cgi for a room
Is Underwater next? I hope so.
yes
so dude, are you 'back' back, or just here for Halloween?
The film's colour grading, bloom filter and overexposure is so horrendously eye-straining that I've had to retreat down to the comment section and listen to the last 14 minutes of the review.
fan films i saw on public access as a kid were higher quality than this film.