The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) - Master Monet Thief Scene (1/9) | Movieclips
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2024
- The Thomas Crown Affair movie clips: j.mp/2nUeX7N
BUY THE MOVIE: j.mp/2nLetEj
Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u2y6pr
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Thomas (Pierce Brosnan) steals a Monet from the museum and leaves undetected.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
When a priceless Monet painting is stolen from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the police find themselves wondering which world-class art thief pulled the job. What they don't know is that the thief wasn't a professional, but an amateur. Thomas Crown (Pierce Brosnan) was born poor but made his way through Oxford on a boxing scholarship. With his sharp sense for business and ruthless ambition, Crown has become a self-made billionaire; but despite his wealth and power, he still seeks new challenges, and he steals art not for the profits but for the sheer excitement. However, as fun as art theft might be, it's still illegal, and investigator Catherine Banning (Rene Russo) is brought in to track down the culprit. Certain clues point to Crown, so Banning introduces herself into Crown's social circle. Police detective Michael McCann (Denis Leary) warns Banning against getting too close to Crown. She takes McCann's suggestion lightly -- until she finds herself falling for the suave thief. The Thomas Crown Affair was adapted from the popular 1968 caper film of the same name starring Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway; Dunaway appears in the new film as Crown's analyst.
CREDITS:
TM & © MGM (1999)
Cast: Pierce Brosnan
Director: John McTiernan
Producers: Pierce Brosnan, Bruce Moriarty, Roger Paradiso, Michael Tadross, Beau St. Clair
Screenwriters: Leslie Dixon, Kurt Wimmer, Alan Trustman
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS: bit.ly/1u2yaWd
ComingSoon: bit.ly/1DVpgtR
Indie & Film Festivals: bit.ly/1wbkfYg
Hero Central: bit.ly/1AMUZwv
Extras: bit.ly/1u431fr
Classic Trailers: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Pop-Up Trailers: bit.ly/1z7EtZR
Movie News: bit.ly/1C3Ncd2
Movie Games: bit.ly/1ygDV13
Fandango: bit.ly/1Bl79ye
Fandango FrontRunners: bit.ly/1CggQfC
HIT US UP:
Facebook: on. 1y8M8ax
Twitter: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Pinterest: bit.ly/14wL9De
Tumblr: bit.ly/1vUwhH7
This scene is so good. Pierce has that effortless look of someone who is experienced - patiently waiting for the opportune moment. Great scene in a classic.
Almost like a spy.
@carlosrivas1629 Yeah, he'd be a great Bond. Best pre-21st century one for sure.
I loved the music. It was a key “character” in the whole movie. Watch it whenever I find it!
One of my favourite movies, Pierce Brosnan was at his best & Rene Russo sparkled. I wish Hollywood had higher regards for this genre of movie and acting.
This was such a good film; one of the rare cases where I liked a remake better than the original, and I liked the original. I especially liked how they cast Faye Dunaway, who played the insurance investigator in the original, as Crown's psychiatrist in this one.
Fun fact: on the first day of filming, director John McTiernan noticed that Pierce’s body language was too “Bond”. The next day Pierce came with a completely new set of movements.
Proof that Pierce IS Bond.
Meh what would be the point? Every time he's in an intense sort of scene, wearing a suit, he's always gonna be Bond.
Yes, this is called an adjustment
he is truly a great actor.From comedy,drama and even musical.I first saw him on Mrs Doubtfire and now he played great roles.God bless
@lindildeev5721 Any actor who plays Bond is inevitably connected to it. Connery, Moore, Dalton and Lazenby are strictly remembered for Bond. Only Craig has ever managed to step out of Bond's shadow atleast slightly.
Jesus... Brosnan just can't NOT look like Bond!
that was Intentional...as this Movie came during his Bond Contract...
Agreed. Like at 1:43, something about the way his hand is open as he rolls under the gate just screams 007
He IS Bond, aside from Connery. The two best Bond ever, imho.
@@Alfieliu78 Brosnan and Craig.
Hahahaha true
The three most important parts of this remake is that in all of them they didn't make it a complete remake. It was a different theft, different real motive, and different all around cast. Brosnan and Russo just were absolutely electric in this, and their interactions really felt like foreplay leading up to them getting together.
Regarding the folding, sometimes ya just gotta let go and go with the flow of a magical tale. The whole movie is art in itself. And beauty. Class. I found it extremely stimulating and exciting. That's what it was meant to do. And oh yeah, with a little humor along the way.
are there no famous paintings small enough to fit in a suitcase without folding?
Say what you want about the painting bla bla bla, but I miss bronsin...... no one oozes more class than this man, miss him as bond also!
I agree with but my father and husband measure up.
@Kate Kingston no he hasn't he's the definition of fine wine
David not Bronsin, BROSNAN, by the way I miss him as Bond too, Pierce Brosnan is a great actor and great comment, congratulations!!!
@Kate Kingston katie great comment
Except Steve McQueen, but in a more lad chad way
“Uh... uh... who is the guy slipping under the security gate thingy? That guy right there, in the suit.” Not one person saw him in a crowded hallway wiggling under gate.
"The guy carrying the briefcase that looks just like the one with his fingerprints on it (no gloves) that was specially made to be extra strong to hold up the gate"
2:10 - Pierce Brosnan's charming body movements makes the witnesses go completely blind.
Steve Mcqueen's original was great and sometimes its difficult on the remake to be as good but this is great in a different way. Pierce Brosnan does a excellent job. I think the secret on remakes is put your own stamp on i,; script, music, the lot. Both great films.
This one didn’t have that much suspense. Not only was there drama or romance. I also found it to be like a comedy 🎭
Wholeheartedly agree! I think Steve would’ve liked it.
To this day it drives me crazy how he fits a painting bigger than the briefcase and doesn’t break the wooden frame after he folds it…I always say “crunch” when Crowne folds the briefcase. (I think even John McTiernan said something about it in the commentary.) Crowne goes home, unfolds the briefcase…painting is fine-sets it up in the wall. My mind is going “HOW???!!!”
They should have had him with a case and doing charcoal drawings. So it makes sense he has a bigger case to fit the painting. Besides wouldn’t his finger prints be on the frame?
@@RM-we7pxhe had a glove on that he grabbed the frame with, but totally agree with the larger case
1:55 This is the only flaw in the entire movie. The painting is removed from it's frame but you can clearly see a wooden sub frame supporting the canvas as it is manoeuvred into the magic old masterpiece folding machine. Then, through Hollywood magic, it is folded not once, but twice without damaging it in the least and now fits in a briefcase. This is Hollywood sleight of hand and it goes by quickly. Don't blink or you'll miss it (as the producers intended). When he removes it later there is no damage and not even a crease....
Still a great movie and made all the better by Denis Leary's magnificent deadpan portrayal of the detective. Love it.
Cheers, D.
Yeah that part always annoys me because he is doing the whole job so smoothly and elegantly and then that happens.
Yea, I was like, how is his briefcase folding the painting without damaging or creasing it?
I didn't think it was hidden at all. He even extends the brief case. I just took it as a wink-to-the-audience spy-magic kind of thing to set the tone for the movie.
i wonder why they didn't just give him a long briefcase in the exact dimensions of the painting.
Sort of bothered me for a long time. Well said
One thing I never understood about this scene, is the briefcase he puts the painting in and folds it in half. That is surely destroying it.
I was looking for this comment
I have wondered this for years n year,amazing...
and did anyone wonder how the camera"s" in every corner (in n out the room),didn't catch any view of the thief from any angle? And~before the robbery carried on,why didn't any cam catch the moment he put down the briefcase between the gate,just amazing~ besides those quizzes,love the whole movie,so cool so handsome
I was thinking the same thing
I saw something a week or so ago about there was a scene of him cutting the painting out of the frame that was deleted because producers were afraid it would anger the art enthusiasts showing him damaging the painting. They left it to your imagination how he was able to get the painting in so quickly.
@@Just1Guy1000^yep
Can't beat an original, McQueen and Dunaway motion in tandem in every scene. ❤
He's like a One Man-Oceans 11.
I believe the canvas was rather gently formed into a "U" inside the suitcase than hard folded into a "V" or worse "I" to leave a crease
I felt pain when he crudely ripped the canvas from the frame....
Danny30011980 ikr, forget the painting give me the frame
It felt like scratching an original record in vinyl !😬🤕
One of the rare examples of a good remake, but it's hard not to notice that the painting would not fit into that specialized suitcase without breaking the wooden frame.
frame doesn't matter. the painting does
and when the wooden frame breaks the painting would rip / crease
Yeah that was a weird scene. At 1:54 you can compare the size of the painting with the suitcase, maybe he could have put it in landscape but then 1:57 he turns suitcase horizontal and trying to fit painting in landscape for some weird reason. MY brain break after that.
@@upcom1ng116 it’s not a suitcase. It’s a briefcase. A suitcase is something you put clothes such as a suit, in. 🤦🏻♂️
I put my briefs in my suitcase and my suit in my briefcase
The alarm is the same one from N64 Goldeneye
90's soundeffects
@@rovhalt6650 interesting
It shall be known as the Brosnan alarm. We do use a digital Brosnan in Goldeneye after all.
This was an excellent film! It left me hanging on the edge of my seat as to what was going to happen next. If you like Pierce and Rene they are at their peak in this performance. Highly recommend for an evening flick!!!!! 👍
Also pierce brosnans hairstyle was also in its prime as well.😁😁 1999 in my opinion is prime pierce brosnan
Okay, what I never got was...he FOLDED IT IN HALF. Unless that's a magic Bag of Holding, he just destroyed the frame at the very least. There'd have been a visible crease in the returned piece.
Exactly.
Surprised ain't nobody asking that question.. & forget about the crease he will have to break the painting in half folding like that.
@OLD SCHOOL GAMING. & Wat about the frame?
@OLD SCHOOL GAMING. U trying hard to keep up 😂. OK.. let's close the deal, shall we? Coz if u have seen the movie then imdt after he steals it he directly goes to his house and place the painting with the frame on the wall after taking it out from the same briefcase while enjoying his wine.
This folding hunts me since 1996.
Originally the film had Crown breaking the frame to allow it to fold (fan theory is that a device in the case did the dirty work) but it didn’t make the film because the director thought that the audience might be put off seeing Crown damage the painting.
I always loved this movie, but the mechanics of the painting in the briefcase scene never did go over well with me.???
It’s canvas, which despite its age is remarkably malleable and sturdy, so yes it can be rolled up or even folded (presuming there was some internal curvature in the spine of the briefcase).
@@spazbot81 ,
But there was a thin wooden subframe that the painting was still attached to after the main frame was removed. Break that subframe by folding and you tear the painting.
I believe I remember hearing that they did film more footage of how he put the painting in the briefcase without destroying the canvas frame but it was cut from the final version. So they put thought into but then dropped the idea.
@@spazbot81 It absolutely 1000% cannot be folded like that hahaha wow. No, the director said it was a mistake they didn't think the audience would notice the briefcase is smaller than the painting. The guy messed up bad.
@@Musicologist365 false
Only pierce Brosnan can do it he is the best 007
The fact the one overseeing all or one of the wings doesn't know the team member (at such an high profile art gallary). The video shot of him triggering the alarm and the physics involved by pulling his arm into it, elbow pulled back adds to the drama been going on.
This is my favorite Pierce Brosnan movie after than James bond franchise.
1: James Bond franchise
2: Thomas crown affair
3: Dante’s peak
4: the matador
5: mrs doubtfire
6: mamma mia
Also after the sunset was decent
SCHWARZENEGGER tailor of Panama was good too.
Dante's peak was my favourite
Did he deserved the Best Actor Oscar for the Matador?
@@muhammadandraaditya4802 I think so.
I think one of his best movies was “The Heist”
Badass museum proctor: 01:25
Oh, that smouldering handsome man folding the Monet in half into a briefcase is *TIGHT!!!* 😂
LOL when the old man museum proctors go on the offensive against the crooks. Not up in here!
Such a suave, well paced, wonderful film. Brosnan is at his best here, and Rene Russo really shines. Their chemistry is electric and Pierce is a great Thonas Crown
The idiots in this comment sextion bitching about a folded painting in the briefcase--its a MOVIE, not real life. The internet has made yall overly critical and sooooo lame
Regarding the bending of the painting, later when Crown is in his home office placing the painting in the hidden safe, you can see small vertical lines at the top and bottom of the wooden canvas stretcher, almost like butting two pieces of wood together.
With the kind of money, and possible connections (such as the forger's daughter) Crown might have, it's possible that he had a case built to do exactly that.
I wonder if a Deleted Scene might have shown the briefcase with a type of mechanism that could have cleanly split the wooden stretcher without damaging the canvas.
This is one of my favorite Pierce Brosnon Bond (Non-Bond) movies
one of Pierce Brosnan's best movies
Now this is a man that loves his job and or loves art.
This movie has a bunch of holes in the plot. It's still one of my all-time favorite movies. And I agree it's better (in my opinion) than the original.
1:44
Being Bond has it's own advantages..
Brosnan makes a much better villain than a hero.
It's a fabulous movie but this scene makes me wince. It is an oil painting nailed around a wooden stretcher when he puts it in the brief case it would be impossible to fold it in two and even it he could folding a canvas that old would cause the paint to flake off seriously damaging the work.
It's his Knives out. Like Craig was immensely popular for being 007, but Knives Out is considered by many as THE masterpiece. Same for Brosnan here.
Me parece una buena película..., Con sus error y todo , como el guante roto , el marco de la pintura de madera que no se rajó , y sus huellas en la reja y el piso al salir.
Síiii, tiene errores!! Cuando coloca la pintura en la maleta, está pegada a un bastidor que es rígido, pero luego parece que LA DOBLARA, eso no tiene sentido!
Por cierto, me encanta que haya sido un hispanohablante quien lo haya notado... En inglés no he visto comentario parecido :)
When he snapped the painting in half I almost threw up.
I remember seeing this on family movie night. My mom gasped at that scene.
How to steal a painting like a boss.
So he opens his brief case, takes the painting off the wall, takes off frame and puts the stretched canvas in a frame into his brief case . . . and folds the briefcase closed. Just how is that supposed to work? He folds the painting... someone please explain!
I love the song 🎧
O sinner man !
One of the best songs ever made
1:44 i almost expected the 007 theme to start playing.
Like no one noticed him sliidng under the gate with a briefcase in his hand?
Ever had to evacuate a building in the middle of a legit emergency? That's chaotic as hell. Everyone's focused on themselves and their immediate companions and getting the f OUT. Nobody's looking at the floor unless it's on fire, and maybe not even then. Crown's just taking advantage of human self-interest.
@@brentage5000I just feel like if that happened to me in a museum I'd assume it's because it was about to be robbed and I'd be on the lookout for guys like him sliding under doors. But maybe I watch too many movies.
@@melanienelson1148 lol yeah, it's ironic. WE know the things to look out for after seeing them in movies, but the people in the universe of these movies who presumably also have movies never once think, "....huh. that's odd."😊
I fall in love.
Es excelente tienen justo la pareja veanla es imperdible
Who’s watching in 2020 ?
July 2 2020
sup breh I love this movie :)
Damn, is this 007
Museum security with stun sticks😮 When they say "please exit the premises", you better exit the premises🤕
Everybody worried about folding the canvas. Number one: it's oil on canvas. Half the point of oil on canvas is durability; it's not watercolor on paper. Oil on canvas CAN be folded in half for a brief time without suffering much damage, obviously assuming you're not pressing along the crease to make a tight fold. Number two: he did NOT fold it in half. If you watch the actual scene, he clearly folds one third of the case over half of the painting and then bends the second half of the painting not in a crease but OVER the thickness of that first third of the case. The screenwriters clearly thought about this and if a canvas can be rolled with no problem, there should be no issues at all with the radius of curvature shown in this clip, which is probably like 3/8".
You're all worried about the folding of the canvas and not the much more glaring problem: pretty easy to probe people's recollections and perhaps video for who was carrying a briefcase matching the description of the one that was (a) specially designed for strength (b) blocked the security gate and (c) was left behind at the scene.
The whole briefcase painting thing ruins a whole lot of the movie. What a dumb decision.
Guard is Linda kozlowskis dad in crocodile dundee
Love this movie, highly recommended.
They just couldn't explain why a businessman would use a briefcase large enough to fit a painting, so they just pretended it did 🤷♂️
he folded it.
@@jimmytumbles9640 You mean he broke it
@@rovhalt6650 Why would oil on canvas break if folded?
This movie is just relatively better than the original.
I’ve never understood the part @ 2minutes. He puts the painting in the briefcase and then closes the briefcase in turn FOLDING the painting?!? A) the canvas is that flimsy that it can be folded? B) wouldn’t that ruin the painting and (in turn) make it worthless?? Somebody please explain if you can.
It snaps the frame.
You’re right. It would crack the work.
Look again. The briefcase was small then adjusted to fit the size of the painting. I thought he folding the painting too XD
The Redemption “watch again,” 😆 even in ‘slow-mo’ still see him folding down that painting... I’m missing something 🤷♀️
@@buttaflybex3872 came back to watch this again and yeah he did fold it XD. My bad.
Y'all can have 007 I'll take Thomas Crown. Lol 😂🤣😭
Great Movie TRULY enjoyed THIS Car an mouse game between and the insurance investigator actress Russo. Really have fun with themselves with THEIR Sharp wits about them. Ohhhh yea!!! Nothing like chasing them being chased. Amen 😁👍⭐✅
if you fold that oil painting like that, it will crack the painting, thats for sure
1:57 is a great example of a film-making error that completely takes one out of the film and breaks its spell. Until this point, Crown is "real", the museum is "real", the thieves are "real". When he takes a wooden framed painting and folds it in half without breaking the wood and damaging the painting, and does it without any effort, the observant movie watcher is brought up short as they are informed that this is not real at all. It makes no sense in our world or in the world of the movie. A big distraction and a big flaw.
He removed the wood of course, and only folded the canvas which you can fold. Do you really think a master thief and a art lover would risk damaging the painting. Of course not. Just because you don't see every single step of a progress doesn't mean it does not happen.
@@jaimy_games this was my thought process as well. I figured he has a full restoration setup in some undisclosed location where he repaired/restored it then reframed it and returned it before anyone noticed. Similar to the movie Bad Boys toward the end where Martin Lawrence got the car and rescued Will Smith. I actually had a dream that he was hobbling to the car with Tea Leoni's help and he humorously tries to slide over the hood to get to the driver's side. "It really tied the scene together."😎
Its a canvas painting, so can bend.
Watch it again. There is still a woden frame in the paint when he puts it in the case.
@@rc1982 That's not a frame, those are called stretchers. And in the scene that follows, when he hangs it up at home, the stretchers show a cut across them right where the whole thing was bent in the case. In the original edit they just had a small cutting tool or something to zap those in half, I assume.
ONE ODD SCENE IS THIS ONE AS CROWN TRIES TO PUT THAT MONET PAINTING INTO A CASE THAT IS WAY TOO SMALL. IT LOOKS LIKE HE'S FOLDING IT AND THIS CAN'T HAPPEN TO A $100 MIL PAINTING!!
In this appeares a reply: "If he is a thief then he is romanian".
When something is said is better to be based on serious investigation and knowledge.
Is equivalent to say about USA "If is a drugged than is USA"
BTW !! Hello from Romania.
You can say much worse things about the USA than that.
Giallorossa insensibile privo di scrupoli ma gli attori sono in grande forma. Orgoglio italiano per i ristoranti "le Cirque" e"Harry Cipriani"
But the cameras in the room would have filmed him, they would know who did it?
You need to watch the movie to understand why the cameras didn't pick him up ;)
Awwww, look at little remington steele go
This remake, with mannish Russo, just seemed pallid compared to the 1968 version
Hires a crew to steal a painting.
Stakes out the gallery until his hire hits it.
Rats them out.
Uses the distraction they create to heist it himself.
That's real 4D chess, kids.
E4 mafia lol
Is it me or is the alarm the same as is one of the main ones on an iPhone today?
What happened to the cameras in the gallery?
M encanta ver peliculas de robo de artes
Brosnan's best Bond film.
Say what you want about the painting bla bla bla, but I miss bronsin...... no oozes more class than this man, miss him as bond also!
2:21 the alarm blaring sounds awfully familiar... N64 anyone??
Awesome Movie! But how can he close the breifcase without breaking it.
He's a billionaire?
Hollywood!
Haha…”oh yes…”
Fun fact: pierce Brosnan released another james bond movie after this was released🎉
Wow very interesting film😎
This was the best scene. It got hella boring after
Now THIS is a Bond movie
Does he fold it in half? Doesn't that spoil it?
When this scene was originally shot they showed Crown tearing the canvas loose from the wooden frame before stuffing it into his case. However, the studio didn't like the idea of treating a Monet like that (even a fake one) so they reshot the scene without him breaking the wooden frame and hoped that audiences wouldn't pay attention. They did though, lol.
I think it's a fake in the movie: his adopted daughter had painted over the original in a run off water color. So, in this version of the story, Thomas Crown never stole anything. He simply moved the paintings around. That's why I kind of like this version better than the Steve McQueen version.
Dirtcheapmeal assistir o vídeo completo dublado
A arte do crime de 1999
MiSt has it right: according to the behind-the-scenes info, they tested a version where they showed Crown breaking the frame without damaging the canvas, but the focus group audience was horrified that he did that to a Monet, so the studio edited it out. (Personally, I agree - old paint cracks, there's no way there wouldn't be some damage; I'm not okay with the watercolor painting on top, either, and the water damage to the canvas when the fire sprinklers go off. For heaven's sake, the wrong degree of humidity or wavelength light can damage paintings!) To address another comment, this is the "real" Monet in this scene. Crown then loans the museum another painting temporarily to take the place of the missing Monet, and that painting turns out to be the real Monet under a watercolor copy of the loaned painting. So he only had the Monet in his possession for about 5 days. The whole thing was about the thrill of it for the man who has everything.
I always hear a "crunch" in my head when he does that.
All works are in the hands of fine collecting folks
Bond at his best!
This was ridiculous. I never understood this heist. He would have had to fold the painting in half and it's on wooden stretchers. Plus, there's no way something like a security switch wouldn't be confirmed. So dumb.
So he just folded the painting completely in half inside the briefcase? And not one person noticed him sliding on the ground out from under the security gate that just happened to not close all the way? What the heck man lol
and no video cams anywhere . .. hmmm
if he wasn't bond during the time of Forever and Batman and Robin I would love to have seen him play Bruce Wayne/Batman.
How do you fold a painting without ruining it?
... how does it fold???
OH YEAH!
So surveillance cameras wasn't a thing back then or?
apparently!
whats the background score after he rips off the painting from the frame
Nina Simone - Sinnerman. This part of the song starts at around 04:50. th-cam.com/video/1vDZsABHUbQ/w-d-xo.html
Fun film
No one saw him crawling out?
what about crawling in?
@harrylongbaugh1 wont be able to pull off the same stunt now with CCTV all over the place in and out of buildings
Billions of dollars of art and he didn't pop up on camera either. But they made up for this gaff when Rene Russo joined the party.
this movie has some plot holes.
they couldn't rewind the video to see who placed the suitcase under the bench? I mean before the increased room temperature rendered the cameras useless? furthermore, they wouldn't be able to review the CCTV footage on the day of the heist to see if anyone snuck in or out of the exhibit during the lockdown?
Placing a briefcase under a bench is hardly a crime.
Yeah just in this scene alone there are some plot holes. Or rather, extremely high risk, uncontrollable aspects that no professional thief would tolerate.
For instance, there's a "robbery attempt" in this gallery, but Crowne's plan relies on not a single security person trying to lock down the area personally or standing at the gates. And then, a crowd of people are walking down the hall to leave, and a man carrying a suitcase crawls under the wedged-open gate right next to them and... no one notices him?
The Briefcase holding the painting makes no sense.
Did he fold that priceless painting in the briefcase?
It was a good movie