2017 Ford Ranger XLT vs Volkswagen Amarok V6 | CarAdvice
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Double-cab pickups have been getting ever closer to their SUV stablemates in terms of comfort, safety and technology... but it seems power hasn't been a huge focus. Until now.
We put the new Volkswagen Amarok V6 up against the Ford Ranger XLT to see if the new car's added oomph is enough to make it king of the utes.
-------------------------------------------------------------
CarAdvice.com is where Australians turn to for the most comprehensive independent reviews of new cars.
Our videos are created by expert and unbiased journalists who are passionate about their work. We have fun making these videos and we hope you enjoy them too.
We welcome the opportunity to answer your questions and encourage discussion. Don’t hesitate to ask us a question in the comments section.
Subscribe to CarAdvice for your regular fix of automotive news, reviews and entertainment.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR TH-cam CHANNEL HERE
th-cam.com/users/sub...
CONNECT WITH US
- / caradvice
- / car_advice
- plus.google.co...
- / caradvice
JOIN OUR EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Get the latest news, reviews and videos fast-tracked to your inbox by registering for 'The Shortcut' here: www.caradvice.c...
LINKHERE/?TH-cam&YT_DESC - Read the article here.
You have failed to test the braking of the two vehicles on gravel. The Amarok has an off road setting for the ABS brakes which makes a huge difference.
Rear airbags, really? 4motion Auto was the reason I did not buy my 4th Ranger and went Amarok. For the family, I don't need features that help in a crash, I prefer features that REDUCE the chance of a crash and the Auto box on the Amarok is leaps ahead of the Ranger......So 4years later, 86 000km covered and not one breakdown for the Amarok, not one issue and still going strong...so the order for the V6 has gone in.
Good luck in a side impact
People won’t understand how good a VW Amarok V6 is until they drive one especially after fitting it out will all the typical 4x4 upgrades. They are awesome. People’s way of thinking needs to evolve with technology. Its by far the safest and most versatile 4x4 I’ve ever driven. Power, Power, Power, get out of my way!
@@aaronclose2325 i drove one of the new amarok v6's yesterday and was actually shocked how good they were compared to the others, the power is crazy
Freshy420 They are great vehicles but the lack of rear airbags is a massive oversight. Even if you’re a fantastic driver, you can’t always account or overcome other drivers actions, it’s far better to have the safety tech included and not needed than than need it when it’s not there.
@@MaZEEZaM for me i couldn't give two fucks about the saftey of it haha
Just gotta keep in mind the Amarok is a 2010 vehicle with a facelift. The reason why its behind in safety is because it was class leading when it came out, everyone else brought out new models catch up and eventually overtook it, some some manufacturers have had 3 models come out in the time amarok has been out.
Not quite - but yes, the Amarok is older than most. However we have spoken to VW engineers who say the car is capable of having rear curtain airbags fitted - so they just need to do it.
Those that have Amaroks know what they have, there is a reason why more and more people move over to them. Eventually people look past the media and let results speak for themself.
You use Isis as a guide to what sort of vehicle you should be buying? hahaha
Well done guys , finally an objective, fair and no bullshit comparison , I recently traded in my 2016 Navara for a Wildtrak , I run a company where we go off road to track and repair pipe lines , my opposite number runs a fleet of Rangers opposed to my Nissan and v6 Amaroks ,Rangers run rings around us in all perspectives
VW Amarok all the way, I do drive one .. Taking it everywhere so car like inside is great and the best payload in the class. VW diesels awesome.
Paul Tighe not for that pricing though.
you said it, CAR like. to low to take off road. Kill people with exhaust gas. pile of shit.
@@oldbloke100 took my v6 amarok to fraser and it did everything as good if not better than most people, full stock vehicle too
@@freshy4204 I'm sure it drifted like you were on a cloud of smoke 420
@@oldbloke100 only drifts were the rangers struggling at inskip
Looking forward to buy one UTE in Greece. Ranger here comes in 2,2 Limited Edition and it costs around 28k euros (for farmers) including Navi, leather heated seats, off road pack and front parking sensors. On the other hand new Amarok costs about 29k, but it lacks all the above accessories, plus rear airbags. But this V6 engine plus the automatic 8 speed gearbox with 4motion (need this more like a car, than a workhorse) make Amarok look soooo tempting, that it makes the obvious decision (ranger) not so obvious finally. Think I'm going for the Ranger, but this engine makes my heart hurt...
I bet nobody who has driven the V6 Amarok buys a ranger
I drove them both on the weekend and it’s soo hard to decide
I absolutely loved the smooth drive and tech in the ranger, but that engine in the amarok is really hard to forget.
If I was to buy 1 tho I would probly still go the amarok as although the tech in the ford is cool, do you really need it? Nope
You also need a forklift to get your pallet out of the back.
I just took an Amarok Sportskine, Ranger 3.2 and Ranger 2lt for a test drive yesterday. Loved the V6s power and extra width inside was great. The steering wheel in the Ranger felt a lot better and the Rangers ride was also a lot smoother than the Amarok. I also liked the electronics in the Ranger. The 2 lt Ranger was smoother compared to the 3.2. But the Amarok’s acceleration was awesome. Very hard to decide which to buy.
Stephen Dyer both good utes, im mostly on road use and the Amarok drives like a car. Even the wife loves driving it.
they are completely right the ford ranger has been the best truck since 2012
And I like the previous generation Toyota Hilux SR5 the most :)
Yes, these are better in any measurable way... but the legend is a legend!
Iv test drove both.... Amarok v6 is on order!
There is no comparison.
these videos are always bias, i did the same thing and it wasn't even close, the amarok blew me away
and that why i got 2016 ranger wildtrak , love it
jeffery Pacey is stilll ok
Has your DPF caught on fire?
surely the transmission is cooked by now
Great better than vw dieselgate scandal
Another thing, I'm surprised that so many people in the comments think that Ute's are just for tradies. I think you'll find (I fall into this category) that these flashier Ute's (I just bought a Wildtrak) are used by outdoor professionals like Engineers, architects etc. I for one need a laptop, and in my outgoing Amarok that meant buying an inverter that lived in my glove box. I also have a baby seat in the back for my 2 year old. Now airbags in the back and a 230v outlet are HUGE bonuses for me and I couldn't a flying nuns fuck about putting a pallet in the tray - just as long as I can throw my bike in there and shit from Bunnings on the weekend and when I go camping.
Airbags and babyseats normally don't work, maybe in your country..
They do't mention some of the major issues the Ranger has the headlights like candles. Ford has had some major issues with this diesel engine.
150 watts and a hairdryer. That's going to take a looooong time. :D
Had to admit, I thought this sounded a lot like a Ford ad, until they mentioned all the missing stuff in the amarok, then I could see why the Ranger won.
The Rangers are very thirsty though, and really quite shoddily built (paint, suspension, interior, gearbox) which obviously never finds it's way into a review.
mattheginger I'm on to my second Ranger... never had issues with anything you mentioned. I know there are Rangers out there with problems... but, show me a vehicle that's never had any issues haha
You sound more like a vw fanboy
So the Ranger is the best because it has rear airbags? 0-100 in 10.7 vs 8.2? Wider like a proper truck in the USA? Amarok wins in my book, huge difference in performance. Would pay 10+k for that difference in performance, no contest. Should compare them side by side, it would be a total humiliation in an acceleration test
Grabbed an Ultimate 4 weeks ago and very happy. And yes owned a brace of fords and to me change can be good as a holiday. Quality interior and engine/transmission sold me. Mind you I don't have rear passengers other than a dog. Use mine more as a car with occasional trip to the farm.
I now we have a Ford Ranger
I have the wiltrack, company car and am impressed. VW are very good at disappointing customers when things go wrong (often), bad satisfaction index over a long period of time.
I have a tremedous experience with the ranger. It is the way to go sometimes i forget that im driving a heavy pick truck.
dude with the beard has really improved....well done !
I'm getting a Danger Ranger when the start selling them in the US.
Ok, having looked at a few CarAdvice comparisons now , a few things have come to my attention-
1. Any vehicle can win a comparison depending on the criteria set. eg- which car has the most Ford badges.
2. The trend is listing the number of features rather than the benefits any of these features might provide.
3. A lack of real world facts or evidence as it's faster and easier just to form an opinion.
Any chance of a full comparison? Maybe one with some real world owners or potential buyers.
The ranger is a fantastic car! Glad to see it win again :)
Techrechmac
I
Techrechmac when doesn't it win haha 👌🏿
Jamesy YzTwoStrokeMx true
Techrechmac q
Holdens are better
the brake test in the others test stop at 37 meters way better than ranger, after I drove amarok all the others UTE feels just not ride as good as amarok. amarok wins
Another brilliant report keep up the good work boys.
Great comparison review video. Not even keen on buying any of these cars but was informative and entertaining enough to watch!
Does Ford Ranger 2016 model still have any transmission issues?
The ranger has quiet enough power. I was in my mates mark two ranger on Frazer island and it pulled a stuck Toyota hilux out like a twig
momentum and traction is what pulls vehicles out of the mess. i have towed a GU AND a GQ out of soft sand with my suzuki vitara. first tug on both instances with both vehicles up to the diffs (GU was in an akward spot on a dune and up to the chassis in sand). zuki only has 107KW and weighs 1390kg. far from powerful. i get 0-100km in sometime next week XD
I don't like many wont agree. I drove both, VW is in its own league, only rear space where there is a slight compromise....Also don't test the brakes with one stop, standard ISO test is min, max and average for 10 stops. Vent discs far superior on Amarok and also the reason Raptor will be specified with Rear Discs....
I love the tech and looks of the ranger, but i love the drivetrain of the amarok more. For me, ill wait a couple of years until either amarok adds the tech or ranger adds a EcoBoost v6 diesel
I am buying a ranger in December as my Christmas gift
Not a fan of you calling it a 'Pickup' we are not American, also not much a fan of the music. Otherwise great review.
If the Ford Ranger had a similar type of engine like the Amarok than it would be better.
Rather odd that the brake test was one application, the test should have been repeated stops or down hill with a load in the back.. I would suggest the Amarok would come out on top in those real world brake tests
Why Me :(
Ahhh.. we got toasted
somebody is blaming you for Leg cutting space and a dementable airbags
and lowering a bed trunk sounds a tin can to get rekt by freight liner trucks
Damn True! and yet My rims so scrawny that even people might wanna vomit
and a typical 4 disc is a bullshit to a ute
Disappointed the Ranger has drum breaks. My Foton Finland has rear disc brakes with dull drums for the park brake
I dont get it. When you guy's did your affordable ute test you said the amarok won by a long shot but the ranger in that test is pretty much the same as a wildtrack. The wildtrack just has some better gadgets and some shiny bits but drives the same and has the same drive train as a xls which was in that test but the v6 highline in this test is a much better car then then the core model that won the other test. So why do you think the ranger is better in every step in the way in the test but it looses to the 4 cylinder amarok?
That's exactly my point too. Why does the Amarok lose this review to the Ranger, when in their 2017 4x4 ute comparison video the Amarok core won against the Ranger and all the other utes? seriously how does that work? Whoever is running the show at CarAdvice clearly has no fucking idea.
It is very obvious that what ever the outcome, you were going to say the Ford Ranger. Very biased video.
Know what is a piss off about being in North America right now, TH-cam is the closest I will get to one of these 1/4 ton pickups
So Australia has the same issue as the United states. Lots of expensive trucks for people that won't use it as a truck haha. I did like the base model Hilux you guys tested. The Isuzu seems to be a good value as well. Better suited for the tradesman.
would like to compare the 2.3 d nissan navara
I've driven these two back to back (I've owned a Gen 1 Amarok for 3 years also) and I have to say that the V6 in the Amarok is amazing; it pulls like a freight train! But in the end, I ended up buying the Ranger (Wildtrak) as it's interior is more practical with the 230v Inverter, Sync 3 is great (though I use Android Auto mostly. But still the 8" screen is larger and more responsive than that in the Amarok), there's no curtain air bags in the Amarok in the rear, and the Ranger cost less.
Seriously though, the Amarok is hugely impressive and a very VERY close second.
ranger vs Colorado?
Wait till 2019 when the ranger comes back to the US.
colorado has been having transmission problems lately
Holy shit you guys are getting robbed in Aussie land. Just did the conversion from AUD to USD. Those mid-size trucks are almost $40k. You can get a real truck for less than that which are more capable, better built, better interior features, and better fuel economy.
Kevin Smith yep I have to agree with you matey
I love the VW amarok I think I am in love with it signed maleeha daughter of zak
SNCF he
♪♪••♥♥♠♠♦♦♣♣
Ford.. 'uses 9L per 100km' - switch to Amarok.. '.. it has 180kw of POWER!'... Couldn't you two have compared more consistently? So how much fuel did that Amarok use?
Amarok is powerful, faster (8 sec Amarok VS +11 secs Ranger) and toooo much confortable on the road. And of you like it off -road VW has better tech spects, systems and results. load_ a pallet space vs a old, slower and overated Ranger. Also touch media are modern , they both are the top an the segment,
but overall i prefer the Amarok.
Two turbo system and 8 automatic transmition is a plus on the Wolskwagen Amarok.
I hope he was joking about a 150w outlet running a hair dryer....150w is pretty impressive though!
I got a vw v6 but 😁
Hey guys, I am thinking about buying the Ranger but the XLS, could you tell me the difference between the XLS & the top of the range models mainly the XLT, is there any major differences or are the differences mainly cosmetic ? The main reason I like the XLS is the price .... Thanks Ed
So what is that in foot pounds of torque on the ranger?
Good review, can we please have some men test these things next time however, and I hope the testers didn't find those fire trails and semi rural areas too scary.
+R Soul - Paul did have to rush out and get his hair done... Stay tuned though, we have some proper off-road tests in the plan.
Is it usa truck or another country truck?
VW lies about everything, are you seriously thinking that it has 180kw In over boost. VW just got charged with lying to the customers about the power, torque and the economy
Honestly what has the car world come to?? If Toyota were to produce brand new 2004 model Toyota Hilux's again then I would buy one in a heart beat.
i would take the vw anyday. the rear airbags is an issue but i really do not understand why you need all the technology in the ford
Nathan Cormack
Just keep u safe on road...
2017 thats why
Requirements where I live
yeah nathan that extra power isn't going to keep you safe if a car or another truck hits you and your mates in the back . ild rather safety over power
Just tune the ranger and there you go, more power ! you cant do anything about safety !!
Ah well in 2 years time these two will be the same ute
I want to the see them compared to the bargain Mitsubishi Triton, which is as fast as the Amarok to 100kmh. The D-Max would be good too
Ah. No it isn't. But stay tuned - we put the basic double cab utes together in a mega test, coming soon!
Kindly include 0-100 and braking tests from now on. good stuff, thanks!
CarAdvice.com
After all the crap VW pulled with the Diesel why would anyone want to even buy a VW Diesel anyway.Screw the VW Buy the Ford you can't go wrong with the Ford .
@@automandanrangers are crap in terms of reliability and comfort. Amaroks are better in every way.
The ford interior is BLAND! No way my wife would let me buy one. The VW though is really very nice inside. Also the 3.2 Ford has oil problems plus head gasket problems and even bent chassis problems. Cant find any issues at all when researching the VW.
@Mojo Well she must have thought the bland interior suited you.
Best of luck with vws dieselgate issues and insurance scandals
Well she twisted my arm to buy a Range Rover Vogue instead so probably not. Great car but i miss hosing it out as i did my Defender.
@@timphoto83ec great job they are excellent off roaders
the best: ford ranger
Vw all the way you don’t need the tech that’s in the ranger after all it is a Ute
The Ranger is a better built truck!
I want to see them with the hilux in extreme off road conditions.
lol
It is quite anecdotal that this channel has multiple reviews of these two vehicles and in some VW wins and in some Ranger wins. I have recently had to choose either Mercedes X250d, Amarok V6 and a Ranger. Rangers built quality is abysmal, the ride is horrid and the engine noise is very loud. It was a tough choice between the Amarok and Mercedes, but ultimately Mercedes won because of how fuel efficient it is and the quality of the ride. It was a hard choice, but Ranger wasn’t even in the same decade as these two. I have no clue how people choose Ranger over an Amarok.
Also, it is super funny how in this test they set safety as the main reason why ranger won, yet when they test Mercedes with any other truck, it is never an edge tipping argument?
Best of luck with dieselgate issues. My mate in Australia owns a Toyota hilux for 14 years and bought a ford ranger . Now the ranger is 6 years old He hasn't found any issues on it. A great capable vechile. Vws are trash. Owned them horrible vechiles
@@Dondly sound like a fanboy of vw
Alot of VW fanboys hurt. The ranger won primary because it was better value for the price. Personally I have a Triton, even better value.
Do agree, love the amarok too bits, but the price is horrendous
I really like the Ranger but put it back to basics, Its a work horse not a Rolls Royce. Put that extra shit on as an option. It would probably make the unit $5.000 cheaper
What did they do to the ford ranger we all know and loved 😭 it used to not look like trash
What's wrong with it?
Holy wah!! + 60k for a mid size pickup?
3.0 V6 550n.m....sounds to me like the Nissan V9X engine.
What would happen if you tow 3501kg in these utes.
End. Of. The. World.
Plain and simple.
Think Planet of the Apes, the Marky Mark one, yeah - that bad.
I have a amarok 2.0 manual my neighboors have a ford each we tug them both with same street tires and they lost..._What?What can you say to me about fords? Amarok is the badass
What a "fluff" piece. These two are more impressed with how many LCD screens and tech that you'll never use and will probably fail rather than driving experience, quality of materials etc,. And yet again these clowns have to mention 3500 towing on the Ranger which is absolutely unusable in the real world - it is a fallacy and is NOT a selling point but they probably had to say it because it was in the script Ford gave them. Hey, show us how you got in the back seat of the Ranger if the Amarok is so bad and then mention that the rear appears bigger only because your legs are propped up closer to your chin because that's how it looks in the video. So the VW loses out because it is faster, has better driving dynamics, more interior room, better fit & finish, higher quality materials, larger tray........but no rear airbags, 'silly' cup holders instead of an outlet for your hairdryer and a 6.4" infotainment screen rather than 7". Yeh right.
John Canalese spot on...i hate how the FR is so overrated....one can even hear the squeaky gear shift from 100m away lol
Alex Alexander just 2 show ponies with features that you won't use ,and if people require these when they are driving a larger vehicle then it would be a good idea not to drive in the first place .Always makes me wonder how long these so called upmarket LCD display screens will last in a pickups in dirty conditions etc I'm sure they won't be cheap as chips to replace, at the end of the day it's just more shit to go wrong and some poor bastard is going to be left to fit the bill .
Well apperently the ranger has had a few recalls about driving off road where stuff gets caught up in the exhaust. Then the exaust heats up the crap and the car bursts into flames
You have valid points, but lack of rear airbags is a showstopper for most people who would put their kids or family in the back
Right on; and don't you forget Amarok's suspension is way more comfortable.
Amarok is better it may drink the gas but its a hell of a car a ranger wont go were an amarok go
I live in the UK and I've had a Ford Ranger Limited double cab pick up for 2 years now, I work in the construction industry and do on and off road driving plus towing as well. I have to say the Ford is a very good vehicle BUT I have also had 2 previous Nissan Navara Tekna double cab pick ups that both did 140 / 150 k miles, don't think there is anything to choose between these two really good 4x4 pick up trucks, before anyone mentions - I haven't had the N300 model.
please compare to the navara d23 np300
Darma Adhitama For three months I've studied/sat in/ read the reviews.I have always been ford. But this time I've chosen the new p300. I'm well pleased :-)
Ranger Wildtrak all the way!
I have to ask you blokes, did you set the front seats the same in both utes? I am 5'2", and could not get into the rear seat of a Ranger when the driver is tall. No matter how far I set the Amarok front seats back, there is always room for some one to sit in the back seats. In the Ranger, even a short arse like me couldn't fit. Seriously! I couldn't even squeeze my little legs in between the back of the front seats and the rear seat! Next question. Not everyone is 6 feet tall. How about you set the front seat of the Ranger to suit a short person. Firstly, can you get in without hitting your head on the sloping A pillar? I doubt it! Does the seat stay in the position you set it? NOPE, every time you get into and out of the Ranger the seat adjuster is pushed down and the seat moves down. If you aren't 6 feet tall, and I doubt your wife is, she will need to adjust the seat EVERY DAMN time she gets into the car! Additionally, she will need to watch her head as she gets in, because she most likely will bump it on the "A" pillar! I drive both an Amarok and a Ranger every day on alternate weeks. Guess which one I put my hard earned dollars on? Neither is perfect, but one doesn't need me to constantly re-adjust the seat. I forgot to mention, the waist height on the Ranger is higher than the Amarok. For short arses like me, the Ranger is bloody dangerous to drive, especially at night. The right side vision is obstructed by the dash, "A" pillar and the rear view mirror. Think about your wife when you choose your next vehicle. Just because you may be able to see clearly doesn't mean she, as usually a shorter driver, is able to do so. The Amarok doesn't have rear seat air bags. It still achieved 5 star ANCAP ratings AND shorter drivers are able to see around the vehicle when driving, are able to get into and out of the vehicle more easily, don't have to constantly reset the seat every time they get in. Think again about which vehicle is safer for your family. You just may change your opinion.
Batu Keras mans gotta get what a mans gotta get! I have a super cab ranger and I can just about fit in the back and I'm just over 6ft
Dumbest comment here. I'm 6ft 4 and can sit in the back with the seat in my driving position. Are you some kind of super midget? And dude, the ranger is built better, got more tech and will outlast the VW by miles. To quote the other dreamer here but correct him, the Ford is lightyears ahead. If Ford wanted to put more power in it, they could. That's the only trumpet VW can blow but it's a non issue.
im 6'1" and was easily able to sit in the back of a ranger with the front seat slid back. i was amazed at how much room there was. far more than a bloody triton. can barely fit a child in them
yea, "if ford wanted to put more power in it, they could", well sir, they did. you can get the Tickford ranger with more power and you can get the Raptor series with many engine options.
I'm 194cm tall and can sit in the back of my Ranger... obviously wouldn't want to do it for 10 hours, but it's my Ranger so I don't need to 🤗
Also... my wife drives her own car so no dramas there 😂
I drove both, the VW is the winner for performance. It is. I completion but with no airbags in the back, the wives won't go for that for the kids in the back. Fail. Next one will no doubt learn and I will buy then...
Ranger nr 1
A Wildtrack would be a better choise for comparison.
A stupied question.
But why does it seems that australians like pickups so much? Is that because of tax benefits or is there a cultural reason?
that its the truth ford its the best for now
ford ranger still wins amarok is noting but a better engine.My money is on ford ranger
Ford for more lights, switches and lcd screen rather then: more powerfull, better roaddynamics, better front seats, more load space etc.
I’d like to see audi use the Amarok, just to match mercedes.
Dessin amaroc et very good
You two are just about the only ones i know that pics a ford above a v6 wolf. Ford drives like a wooden wagon in comparrison
Welcome to bullshit Australian journalism.
Ford makes the world best SUV
the ford is one of the wors out there cant compete offroad or onroad how do you even want to compare it to the v6 its pointles and the amarok has allot more space then you guys showed if got 2 and im 1,8 meters long and my legs dont even come near the seats dont know where you were sitting
So why does the Amarok lose this review to the Ranger, when in your 2017 4x4 ute comparision video the Amarok wonagaisnt the Ranger and all the other utes? seriously how the fuck does that work?
Anybody thought about muting the frickin music so you can hear what theyre talking about FFS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Amarok is kind of pointless tbf, worse off-road (no low range wtf????) Less planted while towing, even more unreliable and less safe
can we have a real comparison with real information for the perspective buyer
Why do you need all that Tec shit. Something else to go wrong. The most important gauge is the temp! Where is it? If you need lane assist then you need to get a real license. Sorry fellers another case of manufactures making something you don’t need which makes the truck more expensive. Later down the track when I buy a new cell phone will it connect to the system? How long will Ford give the updates for the aging system? Hh I forgot, when the ashtrays a full you suppose to buy a new truck.
And do not forget the DPF (Diesel Partial Filter) that has not been perfected properly which when blocked will cost $7.000 to replace on the Ranger. Another Australian government technology first. Every time they change the emission laws the consumer pays. It’s all good to have these things in place but who pays for it. You could pay half the money and restore an older truck and go just as good for much longer.
Ranger has problems i have heard
landcruiser or patrol if u want a real 4x4 just saying
what a petrol patrol...? no thanks. Maybe the Y61 turbo diesel, but geez how old are they getting now.
Ford All the goodies .no good in the bush
Put 4 people in ute some gear in the back and 3500 towing has gone
60 mm holy shit thats way bigger lol
Too bad Ford Wants so much for there Rangers..
Ford ranger is good
amarok is the best
Not even in your dreams
you took the lower end amarok and all amaroks even the 2l 4 silinder comes with cruse control. you guys dont know shit
It doesnt have ADAPTIVE cruise control.... The ranger has ADAPTIVE cruise control. Amarok does have cruise control but it is not adaptive. derp
if the amarok didn't have regular cruise control that would be highly laughable. my 2000 honda odyssey had cruise control standard
fukthegoog what would those cars be? curious to know.