Quantum Psychology | Is There Science Behind Intuition?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025
- #Perception #Potential #Knowing
By examining how the quantum world operates beyond certainty, this reflection reveals how intuition-a seemingly irrational and instantaneous form of insight-mirrors the mysterious mechanisms at work in quantum systems.
Quantum mechanics challenges the way we perceive reality, suggesting that observation itself shapes outcomes. Similarly, intuition transcends linear, logical thought, offering insights that arise without conscious reasoning. It allows us to “sense” truths before they can be articulated. Like the quantum observer who influences the system simply by measuring it, intuition seems to collapse possibilities into perception, making what is abstract feel real and immediate.
In quantum systems, particles exist in a state of superposition-many potentials at once-until a single outcome is realized. Intuition operates in much the same way, accessing the field of possibilities beyond conscious awareness. Whether we call it a gut feeling, a hunch, or inner knowing, intuition navigates this sea of potential, pulling insights from places our logical minds may overlook. It thrives on the hidden connections within ourselves, others, and the world, revealing paths that seem “felt” before they are seen.
Quantum intuition reflects a deeper kind of knowing-one that transcends logic but often proves accurate. Just as quantum entanglement connects particles across vast distances instantaneously, intuitive knowing can bypass steps of reasoning, delivering answers or truths seemingly “out of nowhere.” This form of knowing aligns with our innate connection to the universe, where knowledge arises not from calculation but from alignment with underlying patterns and energies.
Perception, potential, and knowing are intricately linked in quantum psychology’s exploration of intuition. Perception shapes our experience, potential offers infinite options, and knowing collapses those options into a felt reality. Intuition embodies these processes, acting as a bridge between the conscious and the unseen, the known and the possible.
I gave an extremely technical speech on the analysis of the neurology and the way electronics work to come up with a metaphysical theory that was spot on enough that someone else came to watch my speech to see if I was making shit up or credible since I didn't use any sources because I don't need them since I'm right
I have the ultimate test I have wanted to conduct. Get an arena filled with people, have everyone in the arena imagine a certain card lets say the "ace of spades", so now you have a deck, and for the next 10 hours we shuffle and draw cards and we figure out how frequently our card occurs, then you do it with no people, etc...... To see if the card appears more frequently when you have many people working together focused on the hope of it appearing.
Interesting!
I agree with this point, but also disagree with your method: "randomness is the principal of the universe". It suggests that randomness is a fundamental, governing force in the universe, meaning that unpredictable events play a significant role in how the cosmos operates, particularly at the quantum level where certain outcomes are inherently probabilistic rather than deterministic; this is a concept supported by many physicists today, but there is still something missing in their mind. They have a blockage when it comes to "infinity". Their blockage stems from the concept of Mathematics, that does not allow the logical conclusion: If 1/2 is half of one and then 1/1 is one and 1/.01 is hundred times that one, then let's apply logic and move n (the denominator) to ever smaller numbers until n reaches zero. So, what is 1/0? There are two answers: A mathematician will say "not defined you idiot". My response to the math freaks is: "infinity you idiots". Who is right and follows a consistent logic!? Why does the mathematician say "not defined"? Because he cannot use 1/0 in any equation! So he says "infinity is not defined", it makes no sense and does not fit in our mind.
❤❤❤ ✨✨✨✨ 🌙🌙🌙 💫
To predict an incoming phone call is not "intuition". Intuition is not a result of "coincidence", it is a result of "research". It does not come out of "nowhere". I have intuitively known known many things, e.g. that Hubble and the Big Bang are completely wrong. I have been trying to convince people the universe is an infinite and timeless phenomenon. I have always known that mankind takes itself way too important. I would have most likely been burnt on the stake like Giordano Bruno in Rome, but I was born in a "better time", where such tortures are a thing of the past. Only time makes better places - research does only the groundwork before the "building" is constructed. There is no such thing as "Quantum Psychology". Your approach is also wrong. And I bet I am not the only one who knows that, I'm just one of the few not afraid to talk about it. Not afraid to criticize certain "scientists". You are close though - with your comparison to the collapse of the wave function. But it has nothing to do with "observation" and "superposition". The "leap" happens when you accept things you have doubted or even denied, when you bring all your known points into a big picture filled with "pixels" of different colors and at some point it makes a clear, full picture. It kind of "explains" a new vision - you call it intuition. You still make many mistakes in your video - but you are on the right track. If you are honest to yourself you will eliminate your incorrect approaches - or rather they will replace themselves - and that's when your mind "intuitively" finds a solution. You will find it out, just don't block your mind - let the possibilities exist and allow your mind to move in the right direction. When you do that you will see what I mean.
They would have did a "bruno", on me. That is why I waited so long to share. I know to much.