The quality of your production is over top notch! God bless you! I am just looking for a mic for my 200-400mm lens and wildlife adventures. Mostly I want to focus on birds. I consider MKE 600 because of the battery and 3.5mm connection option to Canon R5. I wish MKH 416 had battery phantom power.
So much talk about so little data! I was really curious if these two mics would differ in background rejection relatively to source pick-up in real-life scenario for wildlife recording. You had a gear but you set this test up in a way that gave no meaningful answers. It would be enough if you repeat the test at 20m and 10m. None EVER uses shotgun mics for recording anything from 40m! At that distances you need to use parabolic mic or a wireless lav mic. But also who would ever record a subject that is 20x further from the mic than such a loud noise source is? Noone would ever set it up like this. This is completely unrealistic scenario.
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Studio lightings 😮💨🤌🏻👌🏻 chef 👨🍳kiss 🤌🏻
Thanking you kindly 🤌🤌
I think Seinnheiser is my preferred mic but that’s just for my non-trained non-professional ears. Beautiful shots too ! 😍
The quality of your production is over top notch! God bless you! I am just looking for a mic for my 200-400mm lens and wildlife adventures. Mostly I want to focus on birds. I consider MKE 600 because of the battery and 3.5mm connection option to Canon R5. I wish MKH 416 had battery phantom power.
Thanks
So invented a new language 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣. Thanks for the video
Ha yeah
I was hoping to see a comparison with the two mics, not you just talking in the whole video. Am I missing something?
Maybe more on the field outside is what I would be expecting 😃
What
What
Can you compare these side by side with different distances?
Ha no
Hello! Have you ever tryed the neumann km184?
Could be a good competitor vs your mkh416
Sould be around 650 euro on thomann
No I have not I am still sticking with 416, never really found the need for anything better since
Który leszy według Ciebie?
Eh?
So much talk about so little data! I was really curious if these two mics would differ in background rejection relatively to source pick-up in real-life scenario for wildlife recording. You had a gear but you set this test up in a way that gave no meaningful answers. It would be enough if you repeat the test at 20m and 10m. None EVER uses shotgun mics for recording anything from 40m! At that distances you need to use parabolic mic or a wireless lav mic. But also who would ever record a subject that is 20x further from the mic than such a loud noise source is? Noone would ever set it up like this. This is completely unrealistic scenario.
Tldr
Pawlawk