Very useful video. Even I’m also chief officer of bulk carrier and found good content. Can you pls give link to all the forms you have used for calculation.
@@funnel2tunnel360 Thanks you for everything and if possible, please share the knowledge of real situation on Panama Canal transiting limited draft 12.04m with real scenario videos
As i observed sir base on your draft 12.0m at density 1.020 and you get the displacement at hydrostatic, at what corresponding draft in the hydrostatic you take? as we knew that draft at hydrostatic table are based in seawater density which is 1.025
Why is the Displacement at Sea the same as the Displacement at (Hansaport FW Density being 1) whereas the Density of water at sea is SW 1.025 or at Murmansk BW 1.02 ? Please clarify as I am a little confused.
Hi Dinos! Note that the leg ECA area to Hansaport (just before the arrival port) is considered to be out at Sea therefore the density is taken as 1.025. However, the next row showing the Port Arrvival at Hansaport we have taken the density to be 1. Similarly, for the leg At Sea-Murmansk (just before arrival port) is taken at sea with density 1.025 However, at port Murmarnsk we have taken the density as 1.02. BUT THE ONLY LIMITING POINT AT MURMANSK IS DRAFT WHICH IS 12.00 MTRS, AND PRE-STOW PLAN IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT LIMIT. Hope it clears!
@@funnel2tunnel360 im also still consufes same question with dinos. your calculation displacement from 76837 to arrival port using consumption etc is correct 76731. but is based on density water 1.020. in arrival port is 1.000. so we need correction of density . (76731 x 1.000 ) / 1.020 = 75226. so conclusion is whats correct arrival displacement is 76731 (1.020) or 75226 ( 1.000 ) ? please explain to us..
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
I paid 200 dollar for this lecture. And yet its all in your 3 video.
Thank you very much
It's really worth watching it. Please post some videos on performance claims. Factors influencing the performance ( WF , Currents) . Tks
Very useful video. Even I’m also chief officer of bulk carrier and found good content. Can you pls give link to all the forms you have used for calculation.
Thanks for your video sharing! Could you guide how to make pre-stowage plan for break-bulk cargoes.
Please explain about the concept of hog/sag allowance
We shall be covering the topic soon!
@@funnel2tunnel360 Thanks you for everything and if possible, please share the knowledge of real situation on Panama Canal transiting limited draft 12.04m with real scenario videos
Great channel Sir, keep sharing good stuff
As i observed sir base on your draft 12.0m at density 1.020 and you get the displacement at hydrostatic, at what corresponding draft in the hydrostatic you take? as we knew that draft at hydrostatic table are based in seawater density which is 1.025
nice and easy explanation
Why is the Displacement at Sea the same as the Displacement at (Hansaport FW Density being 1) whereas the Density of water at sea is SW 1.025 or at Murmansk BW 1.02 ? Please clarify as I am a little confused.
Hi Dinos! Note that the leg ECA area to Hansaport (just before the arrival port) is considered to be out at Sea therefore the density is taken as 1.025. However, the next row showing the Port Arrvival at Hansaport we have taken the density to be 1.
Similarly, for the leg At Sea-Murmansk (just before arrival port) is taken at sea with density 1.025
However, at port Murmarnsk we have taken the density as 1.02.
BUT THE ONLY LIMITING POINT AT MURMANSK IS DRAFT WHICH IS 12.00 MTRS, AND PRE-STOW PLAN IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT LIMIT.
Hope it clears!
@@funnel2tunnel360 im also still consufes same question with dinos. your calculation displacement from 76837 to arrival port using consumption etc is correct 76731. but is based on density water 1.020. in arrival port is 1.000. so we need correction of density . (76731 x 1.000 ) / 1.020 = 75226. so conclusion is whats correct arrival displacement is 76731 (1.020) or 75226 ( 1.000 ) ? please explain to us..
Yes even I am confused, kindly explain it in brief arrival displacement and draft
how did you changed the displacement 77214.36 to 76837
The displacement of 76837 mt is the displacement corrected for density 1.020.
please can u explain the role of DWA in deadweight calculation. also about sag allowance for VLOC SHIP..
We are making a separate video focusing on DWA and SAG ALLOWANCE. Stay tuned!
Sir i have a doubt at 11:00...... The displacement obtained at arrival hansaport 76731 is calculated at what specific gravity??
How do you get calculated draft... What is the basis? Sir..
can you please share the table or link for the same, that will be rally helfull
Pls explain how u calculate corrected Displacement 76837@1.020 density of water, give formula pls
very good video 🎉
Very informative mate, Can I ask a copy of your Excel file?
Please put some videos on loading upto marks
the draft at hansaport port with density is 12.22 MT NOT correct 12.31 sir!
What does mean draft at c.f.?
Please clarify, that on load port final displacement is based on density 1.020 or 1.025. Density correction is necessary or not?
Yes the final displacement at Loading port will always be based on the density of water in which the ship is floating.
All three video in part 1, 2, 3 have almost same explanation.... nothing new