Kid Law student: appointed... Mature Kapil: Elected... Kapil Sir corrected it immediately... That's the difference between an experienced person and a beginner... But the intern lawyer asked an important question... I feel that the government must pay for all interns ... whether Medical, Legal, veterinary, engineering or agriculture interns. All students at that stage require some kind of financial assistance. One should not exploit labour in the name of "i am teaching you.. if you want to learn from my experience, just work free for me"
In my opinion...corporate has no responsibility fulfilling a financial assistance requirement of a person present to learn in the corporate situation with mediocre sub par 'labour' that honestly the corporate can do without and is only doing it for the sake of csr laws and metrics and ratings which affect its attractiveness in the politically correct environment but the masses forget that the most attractive part of a corporate setting is its profitability and that's what a majority of masses that are investors actually want from a corporate setting....they don't want that you pay some high school person in a teir3 college who is interning for experience when there are students of teir 1 colleges already ready with that experience or better yet don't require experience as they are by default desired by the corporation. What they ( the investors want) is now against what the political left social justice warriors mainly feminists want that is payment of interns...as payment is expenses on part of the corporation and thus reducing profitability, it's only a matter of 50 years that the csr will be exposed for the sham and facade that it is and corporation will go back to being prioritising profitability and you'll see mass layoffs as there have been this past few years (a result by a number of factors including the ones we are talking about) or worse the corporation would use the opportunity and use the economic shambles that country would be in in such a scenario and leverage the desperation to go on a full scale unhealthy capitalism to exploit labour out of masses ..........the left and the right seem to forget that capitalism should be handled by a mindset that is not on the extremes rather on the midground: the sense of responsibility and morality with touch of practicality and a drizzle of realpolitik like actions recognising reality and actuality of a situation.......a charecteristics that neither of the political factions are known to have any nuance in understanding and is eternally stuck with their ideologies of the extreme......
The student from Zimbabwe was the most articulate speaker than any other Indian student. Perhaps most Indians speak better Hindi but so must the guy from Zimbabwe speak his mother tongue. Was trying to defend the Indians who should improve on their public speaking.
He immediately corrected the student from kashmir politely when he said, "thank you for standing for our cause" by saying...we speak for our clients. He isn't for any cause. No lawyer is. They argue on interpretation and procedure. Even kasab was given a lawyer. You can't say, the lawyer was fighting for his cause. He was simply doing his job.
"Falsified" ? Faking or altering the evidence. Is it proved in court?. Dont conclude everything until the judgement. When you are representing your client..it is about to speak on his behalf of him and even the constitution give opportunity for any accused for a fair trial.
Advocates are not in the court to uphold the truth. They are present to represent their clients, to ‘advocate’ on their behalf. Attorney client privilege is one of the first tenets of this profession.
At 14:30 question relating to stipend is that bar should do something on that but I guess sir took it at personal level and said I will give if someone asked for it but how can someone asked for stipend.I think this is not a proper way and other point is sir said that I can't tell about others lawyers. Question is relating to bar as a body not about sir personally.
All the law student thought kapil sibbal would talk like any leftist and they prepare question like that but kapil sibbal answers all question being neutral advocate😊😂
Sir, PMLA provisions under which Manish Sisodiya..Arvind kejrival are in jail..are not consitutional.. And against freedom. Why it is not challenged before SC as the provisions are violative of citizens fundamental Right??
I am a 62 year old retired govt employee. This was thought provoking. I would Sri. Kapil Sibal to have a series on important Article of the Indian Constitution. Our Constitution is a Great Book for Humanity, akin to the Bhagavad Gita for India. Constitution has presided over this vast and most populated country having mind boggling diversity and seems to have a solution for each and every citizen of this country. It is a fantastic document and there seems to be no parallel for it in this world. Please I request you to do a series on The Constitution of India
@@Dadasahab1234 Amendments have been made by all governments. And Dr. Ambedkar himself included provisions for amendments in the constitution in article 368. However the basic structure of the constitution (like the fundamental rights covered in articles 12-35, principles of secularism derived from article 27 & 28 etc) can not be amended (at least in theory). Thankfully no one has attempted to make such amendments yet. However there is a lot of political rhetoric around the subject specially from the leaders of the BJP. May be they are only using it as political "jumlas" to get votes but this may create an environment where in the future some ultra right wing leaders may come to power and attempt amendments that threaten the basic structure.
@@you_cant_see_me123 pata nhi mujhe kyu laga ye ....Aur kitne boring questions puch rhe h .....Puchna hai toh ye puchte ki practice kaise kare ya phir aur kuch .....Sirf english acchi bolne se inke questions acche nhi ho jaate ......
I am pondering about my rights. I am a PWD, and there is a less debate on rpwd.. if possible, would you please talk on rpwd in your incoming sessions..
Discussion is the essence of democracy. Law should be enacted by consulation with the stakeholders and through debate in the parliament. Article 370, National education policy, New Criminal laws passed is not discussed enough, reasonable and appropriate.
He's correct. The moment you enter china. WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, TH-cam, Instagram doesn't work. Whatever they have allowed, is incredibly controlled and benefits them mutually to a large extent without killing their dominance in the market. So compared to India, china is indeed difficult to enter.
I truly appreciate this student and him to bring this episode and bring some great topics, but most importantly crisis of injustice going on right like the pune porch case, RG kar college and much more had to the prime focus.
Judiciary follows the constitution so blame the constitution? So if I want the law to change then blame the parliament? Parliament means blame your elected MLAs and MPs
It was so good to listen to the conversation. But i still think that privacy is point which need to be debated in the context of the state as today the state that is central government holds alot of power and violation of privacy has been done multiple time using adhaar card, upi etc. caused alot of problems.
How much fee for a case in SC for a lawyer Is it possible for a common man come to SC? How is it possible witness are saying true for taking final decession? What is value of document?
How interpreting a subject matter goes in right angle? It can be twisted as they need. Judiciary system must be very specific in deciding a case based on clear cut rulings without unnecessary arguments.
It's a really great initiative by Mr. Kapil Sibbal to come out on social media and interact with the budding lawyers candidly, but I strongly felt that he has been trying to be politically correct to some of the most sought-after issues of national importance.
*Law and Lawyers!* Law is not doing anything.. law cannot do anything... Being inert, Law alone is not going to bring any big change. The experts who are operating these laws should handle them for the good of the society/country. If the experts are not honest/ don't work for the good of the society, the law alone cannot bring down crimes. The experts have to think and examine their own mind-dynamics honestly and find out the answer for the question, "who is breeding, mainly, the crimes ? - "Who is strengthening the criminals ?!" Let the experts work with honesty and with their own intelligence to do good to the society. A law cannot speak of its own - advocacy done by advocates brings the ability for the laws to speak. Can we please think with an open mind !
I really want his views on: Why don't we have any law of compensation for victims of Wrongful Prosecution? With how long the usual case takes in court, the process turns out to be the punishment.
कितने ही परिवर्तन कर लीजिए कानूनों में. माननीय के दिलों में परिवर्तन की ज़रूरत है. सालों साल सुनवाई नहीं... जमानत नहीं... धारा 120 B(पिछले कानून के अनुसार) में conspiracy का आरोप लगा दिया तो बड़ा वकील भी जमानत नहीं करा सकता. #कानून #unlawful #ipc #bnss #bns #indianevidanceact
Appreciate the new initiative but what they ask to sir ....even they know the gravity of topics...what they ask is totally fake.....nobody ask about legal profession ...they know everything... I thing 😅
Such politically polarised indi MPs should not be allowed in to SC!? Because such MP/ lawer care for his party interest, but can not keep up the judicial justice ethically!?
Sir from m point of view it is not giving justice to d client and most od lawyers r giving wrong information hw can a client approach a advocate like u so that his r her case ll be listened carefullu
Kapil are you fighting for truth or justice or pro opposition agenda. I have yet to see you having an argument in court for justice for victims of rape, victims of corruption, or politics. Your arguments could be seen as vows but making court judgement criticism in media?
This lawyer has earned huge amount of money fighting in Supreme/High court. Surprisingly he has mostly fought for Corrupted people. Hence a Lawer fighting for unlawful activities. Shame
The base in his voice is just incredible 😮
Westerners usually have thay deep voice
it is bass not base. 🙏
Don't pronounce the base in writing. Its bass!
Yes I agree
Same man trying to potect the rapist of Kolkata and gov. Of west bengal😢
He is doing his job
He's only representing the WB government, not the accused.
he will sell his mom. Not surprised
@@sunny123kWB Government tempered with evidence and hindered the investigation..what would you say about that?
Modi hands not tied bro
Please encounter as your wish ...take a law in modi hands.....
Kapil Sibbal is a brilliant mind but I wish he would've spoken in favour of minimum wages for young lawyers.
He is just a genius.... Unlimitedly intelligent.
Kid Law student: appointed... Mature Kapil: Elected... Kapil Sir corrected it immediately... That's the difference between an experienced person and a beginner... But the intern lawyer asked an important question... I feel that the government must pay for all interns ... whether Medical, Legal, veterinary, engineering or agriculture interns. All students at that stage require some kind of financial assistance. One should not exploit labour in the name of "i am teaching you.. if you want to learn from my experience, just work free for me"
wheres that part ??
Around 15@@aadityanirmale1404
@@aadityanirmale140414:15
Yes, in every field. Corporate sector should also pay to law students
In my opinion...corporate has no responsibility fulfilling a financial assistance requirement of a person present to learn in the corporate situation with mediocre sub par 'labour' that honestly the corporate can do without and is only doing it for the sake of csr laws and metrics and ratings which affect its attractiveness in the politically correct environment but the masses forget that the most attractive part of a corporate setting is its profitability and that's what a majority of masses that are investors actually want from a corporate setting....they don't want that you pay some high school person in a teir3 college who is interning for experience when there are students of teir 1 colleges already ready with that experience or better yet don't require experience as they are by default desired by the corporation. What they ( the investors want) is now against what the political left social justice warriors mainly feminists want that is payment of interns...as payment is expenses on part of the corporation and thus reducing profitability, it's only a matter of 50 years that the csr will be exposed for the sham and facade that it is and corporation will go back to being prioritising profitability and you'll see mass layoffs as there have been this past few years (a result by a number of factors including the ones we are talking about) or worse the corporation would use the opportunity and use the economic shambles that country would be in in such a scenario and leverage the desperation to go on a full scale unhealthy capitalism to exploit labour out of masses ..........the left and the right seem to forget that capitalism should be handled by a mindset that is not on the extremes rather on the midground: the sense of responsibility and morality with touch of practicality and a drizzle of realpolitik like actions recognising reality and actuality of a situation.......a charecteristics that neither of the political factions are known to have any nuance in understanding and is eternally stuck with their ideologies of the extreme......
Thanks
Congratulations to Law Students for having discussion with Superb Constitutional Bench Advocate good luck to you all❤❤❤
The student from Zimbabwe was the most articulate speaker than any other Indian student. Perhaps most Indians speak better Hindi but so must the guy from Zimbabwe speak his mother tongue. Was trying to defend the Indians who should improve on their public speaking.
@@vanlalzapichhangte8653 Advocate like sibbal took birth one in hundred years . I am 70 years old, never saw sibbal appears for just cause.
Excellent Session thanks for the Organization.
Good effort and such frequent interaction will be highly appreciated.
Everyone has to uphold the "Letter and Spirit" of the Indian Constitution.
He immediately corrected the student from kashmir politely when he said, "thank you for standing for our cause" by saying...we speak for our clients. He isn't for any cause. No lawyer is. They argue on interpretation and procedure. Even kasab was given a lawyer. You can't say, the lawyer was fighting for his cause. He was simply doing his job.
Kali yug ka shukracharya😂
Don't take coaching from him . He will teach you how a right case can be falsified to protect your client. Please take oath to uphold truth.
"Falsified" ? Faking or altering the evidence. Is it proved in court?. Dont conclude everything until the judgement. When you are representing your client..it is about to speak on his behalf of him and even the constitution give opportunity for any accused for a fair trial.
Advocates are not in the court to uphold the truth. They are present to represent their clients, to ‘advocate’ on their behalf. Attorney client privilege is one of the first tenets of this profession.
@@kalhail7253 Just thinking according to your argument... What would have happened if kapil sibal was the lawer of kasab
Jaa na lvvde. Constitution gave the right to defend to everyone.
@@kalhail7253don't forget why law is there,it's to provide justice
Thank you Sir, such a mind-blowing interaction with law students..👌🙏
Good effort.. Sibbalji. To prepare future of india in judiciary and Law
To prepare defenders to protect criminals and rapists
Shame on this law students
Paisa ka liya apni ma bahan ko BHI road pa lakar ayaga ya log
😡
At 14:30 question relating to stipend is that bar should do something on that but I guess sir took it at personal level and said I will give if someone asked for it but how can someone asked for stipend.I think this is not a proper way and other point is sir said that I can't tell about others lawyers. Question is relating to bar as a body not about sir personally.
"Justice too long delayed is justice Denied"
Very interesting logic, I collected from this session. Thanks Sibbal sir.
fantastic and useful discussions | debates.
Looks like some questions were just handed out to them. Cmon don't do this, let them ask whatever they want!
All the law student thought kapil sibbal would talk like any leftist and they prepare question like that but kapil sibbal answers all question being neutral advocate😊😂
Thank you to all those who spoke English...at least Law students from other countries like me were able to gain something ❤☺️
Very Informative, thank you Kapil Sir for such a great interaction❤
Sir,
PMLA provisions under which Manish Sisodiya..Arvind kejrival are in jail..are not consitutional.. And against freedom. Why it is not challenged before SC as the provisions are violative of citizens fundamental Right??
It is pending in sc
the provision of twin test is mentioned in it
One of the corrupted lawyers of India.Shame on you.
Excellent session 👏
Good thought of sharing experience with junior's for future 👏
But SC doesn't touch anything of the verdict but transfer the honorable bench.
very good discussion, wish more questions were asked
didn't even realise 1 hour was already up. such a cool interaction!
Thanks.sir'ji'''all''mji'thanks❤👏🇮🇳
seriuosly dream to become a lawyer like kapil sibal
I am a 62 year old retired govt employee. This was thought provoking. I would Sri. Kapil Sibal to have a series on important Article of the Indian Constitution. Our Constitution is a Great Book for Humanity, akin to the Bhagavad Gita for India. Constitution has presided over this vast and most populated country having mind boggling diversity and seems to have a solution for each and every citizen of this country. It is a fantastic document and there seems to be no parallel for it in this world. Please I request you to do a series on The Constitution of India
Congress government s made so many amendments in the constitution during their rule that it is no more Ambedkar s constitution.
@@Dadasahab1234 Amendments have been made by all governments. And Dr. Ambedkar himself included provisions for amendments in the constitution in article 368. However the basic structure of the constitution (like the fundamental rights covered in articles 12-35, principles of secularism derived from article 27 & 28 etc) can not be amended (at least in theory).
Thankfully no one has attempted to make such amendments yet. However there is a lot of political rhetoric around the subject specially from the leaders of the BJP. May be they are only using it as political "jumlas" to get votes but this may create an environment where in the future some ultra right wing leaders may come to power and attempt amendments that threaten the basic structure.
Arre ye students itne bade bade kyu lag rhe h .....Kitne bekar questions puche h yrrr .....
@@chinmaysogani6050 Kahan bade lag rahe hai ? sab early 20s ke hi dikh rahe hai.
@@you_cant_see_me123 pata nhi mujhe kyu laga ye ....Aur kitne boring questions puch rhe h .....Puchna hai toh ye puchte ki practice kaise kare ya phir aur kuch .....Sirf english acchi bolne se inke questions acche nhi ho jaate ......
Very well said about article 370
Every senior must paaaaayyyyy !!!!!!!
😂😂😂😂😂
Consider it done.
I am pondering about my rights. I am a PWD, and there is a less debate on rpwd.. if possible, would you please talk on rpwd in your incoming sessions..
Very informative and such a great interaction.
Great and pertinent endeavor ❤
Thanks kapil sibal sir guidance
Discussion is the essence of democracy. Law should be enacted by consulation with the stakeholders and through debate in the parliament. Article 370, National education policy, New Criminal laws passed is not discussed enough, reasonable and appropriate.
12:07 It's difficult to enter China. What I am listening? 😂
He's correct. The moment you enter china. WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, TH-cam, Instagram doesn't work. Whatever they have allowed, is incredibly controlled and benefits them mutually to a large extent without killing their dominance in the market.
So compared to India, china is indeed difficult to enter.
@@Doobedoobedoobahow come TH-cam has china video's if it's banned
I think this is a high time that sir as a president of bar, must do something related to stipend.
Very interesting and informative discussion.
Wishes to Kabel sibel for his service..
Kabel sibel 😂😅🤣
😂@@lalitpawar1094
45:31-52:50 Bliss
Very nice
I truly appreciate this student and him to bring this episode and bring some great topics, but most importantly crisis of injustice going on right like the pune porch case, RG kar college and much more had to the prime focus.
Basic Laws & constitution should be in schools starting from 6 th std onwards ...
Big fan of you sir ❤❤❤
Salute 🫡 Kapil ji his every word has some value
If I had the chance to sit there, I'd ask him - " why do you want to save the culprits of RG Kar case" .
What a man ❤❤
Good effort ❤
A very good effort!
What if executive surpasses the power of judiciary,
Did someone ask about how judiciary is capable of giving 300 words essay for killing people.
Judiciary follows the constitution so blame the constitution? So if I want the law to change then blame the parliament? Parliament means blame your elected MLAs and MPs
In which law it's said to write 300 words essays for killing people ..inhuman argument@@Qwerboy-zv1mk
great conversation
It was so good to listen to the conversation.
But i still think that privacy is point which need to be debated in the context of the state as today the state that is central government holds alot of power and violation of privacy has been done multiple time using adhaar card, upi etc. caused alot of problems.
Respected Sir,
When its prima facie; the view of your goodself then why the Constitutional Validity of aforesaid PMLA Law; is not challenged ??
Money is greater than honor. This man is the rotten side of Indian Judicial system.
What are always welcome to the answer to society world law
10:20 camera man focused
How does one participate in such conversations
How much fee for a case in SC for a lawyer
Is it possible for a common man come to SC?
How is it possible witness are saying true for taking final decession?
What is value of document?
Sir,Suppose if judiciary does not do it's job or if it is inactive can executive take interference ?
Sir ine if the amazing video 😮😮❤🎉
ANY AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF SRI SIBAL?
How interpreting a subject matter goes in right angle? It can be twisted as they need. Judiciary system must be very specific in deciding a case based on clear cut rulings without unnecessary arguments.
Boycott this criminal who support /give releave the criminals in exchange of money.
52:00
It's a really great initiative by Mr. Kapil Sibbal to come out on social media and interact with the budding lawyers candidly, but I strongly felt that he has been trying to be politically correct to some of the most sought-after issues of national importance.
Did anyone hear that favourite case law of Kapil sir
15:47 😂😂😂 Kashmir cry for art 370 and 35A is still there. 370 and 35A is history. Make it clear.
Invite students of Law Faculty, Delhi University also
Bss dukki pdho apniii
*Law and Lawyers!*
Law is not doing anything.. law cannot do anything... Being inert, Law alone is not going to bring any big change.
The experts who are operating these laws should handle them for the good of the society/country.
If the experts are not honest/ don't work for the good of the society, the law alone cannot bring down crimes.
The experts have to think and examine their own mind-dynamics honestly and find out the answer for the question, "who is breeding, mainly, the crimes ? - "Who is strengthening the criminals ?!"
Let the experts work with honesty and with their own intelligence to do good to the society.
A law cannot speak of its own - advocacy done by advocates brings the ability for the laws to speak.
Can we please think with an open mind !
48:30 is just personal
Sibal sir sound is purity
not a single muslim, sikh or a christian among those students who asked questions , yet they dont understand.
I really want his views on: Why don't we have any law of compensation for victims of Wrongful Prosecution? With how long the usual case takes in court, the process turns out to be the punishment.
Sir ji please come to supreme court case against NTA officials and neet paper leak.
Case law : Impeachment of Ramaswamy
I would have asked what his take on rtd Judges joining political parties.
Respected Sir
Mujhe aapki guidelines ki bahut jarurat hai,,,,
Mere pe galt FIR hui hai
कितने ही परिवर्तन कर लीजिए कानूनों में.
माननीय के दिलों में परिवर्तन की ज़रूरत है.
सालों साल सुनवाई नहीं... जमानत नहीं...
धारा 120 B(पिछले कानून के अनुसार) में conspiracy का आरोप लगा दिया तो बड़ा वकील भी जमानत नहीं करा सकता.
#कानून
#unlawful
#ipc
#bnss
#bns
#indianevidanceact
गुरू जी हिंदी और अंग्रेजी दोनों भाषाओं में चर्चा होना चाहिए
धन्यवाद गुरु जी
Appreciate the new initiative but what they ask to sir ....even they know the gravity of topics...what they ask is totally fake.....nobody ask about legal profession ...they know everything... I thing 😅
true
That’s not the case. I am one of them who spoke at 14:18 and nothing was decided before hand and they were all random questions.
Pdji'no'''cks'''m'ts❤
Lawyer against education policy article 370
and against ram mandir
He's even against sc st reservation but not against casteism
What is law.
Sir from arunachal also pls
How much level the policy of reservation and job security is responsible for inactive administration in overall govt.departments ?
Such politically polarised indi MPs should not be allowed in to SC!? Because such MP/ lawer care for his party interest, but can not keep up the judicial justice ethically!?
Sir from m point of view it is not giving justice to d client and most od lawyers r giving wrong information hw can a client approach a advocate like u so that his r her case ll be listened carefullu
One of the most cunning mind of India.
The great 0 loss of 2G Scam.
Kapil sibbal ji is pride of our national judiciary just like a university of law in his personality
❤️
B4 giving sagacity. raise both hands and legs fingers ur side.....
Ur not fit for lawer...... 1:54
Kapil are you fighting for truth or justice or pro opposition agenda. I have yet to see you having an argument in court for justice for victims of rape, victims of corruption, or politics. Your arguments could be seen as vows but making court judgement criticism in media?
As a lawyer he fights his client cases in court, why don't you ask feku to approach sibal to be the prosecutor in rape cases etc
PR works for damge in Kalkatta Horror!
10:22
1:30
This lawyer has earned huge amount of money fighting in Supreme/High court. Surprisingly he has mostly fought for Corrupted people. Hence a Lawer fighting for unlawful activities. Shame