2015 Ford F-150 2.7L EcoBoost takes on the Grueling IKE Gauntlet Towing Test Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.พ. 2015
  • ( www.TFLtruck.com ) ( www.TFLtruck.com ) The 2015 Ford F-150 2.7L pickup with the small turbo-charged EcoBoost engine may not seem like a great towing truck or at least so we suspected. After all a 2.7L engine in a traditional half ton V8 truck seems like a recipe for underpowered towing. So we decided to find out by taking Ford's smallest displacement truck engine and loading it to the max up the Ike Gauntlet grueling towing test review.
    The Ike Gauntlet is a timed run up one of America's steepest highways from 9,000 feet above sea level to the top of the mountain at entrance to the Eisenhower Tunnel in Colorado.
    ( / tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck.
    Check us out on:
    Facebook: ( / tflcar )
    Twitter: ( / tflcar )
    and now even Truck Videos on TH-cam at:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tflcar )
    and classic cars as well at:
    TFLClassics ( / classicsunleashed )
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 893

  • @1FiftyOverland
    @1FiftyOverland หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Coming back 8 years later, after I got my 2105 2.7l ecobeast. It now has 155,000 miles and still runs great no major issues.

  • @AJourneyOfYourSoul
    @AJourneyOfYourSoul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    It’s 2021 and the 2.7 is turning out to be one of the most reliable f150 engines.
    Pretty ironic considering what everyone was saying when it came out.

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yea the war cry from the five oh crowd is tiresome, “just wait till those turbos go out”. Well they haven’t yet but there is a big problem with the five oh rattling and high oil consumption 🤕

    • @cnoyes72
      @cnoyes72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@paulhunter9613 Yeah, though Ford did have "teething" problems with the first gen ecoboost, they are now very reliable engines. I'm wondering how much longer the 3.3l base engine will stick around, though (wondering if the 2.7l will become the new base engine for ford, like the 2.7l I4 did for GM).

    • @angrywhistlingcock5209
      @angrywhistlingcock5209 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@paulhunter9613 I had a turbo go out on my 2.7 F150. I went to LKQ and spent $250 for a used low mileage driver side turbo and 45 minutes later I was good. What's the big deal? It was a cheap and fast replacement.
      The original turbo started passing oil and causing the truck to smoke on startup after it has been sitting.

    • @alextran8188
      @alextran8188 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cnoyes72 my guess it'll stick around for awhile. Especially since ford sells lots of trucks to fleets. Although I've seen a couple 2.7 fleet trucks in for service.

    • @danh8302
      @danh8302 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@paulhunter9613 i have experienced this quite a bit too, the thing I don’t get, you never hear anyone say “but the turbos” about a diesel.

  • @rdsii64
    @rdsii64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I'm from the Future. The second generation 2.7L mated to a 10 speed is beyond awesome.
    I can tow more weight than I will ever need to and get a solid 25 mpg on the highway. This is with a 2018 supercrew 4x4 with a 355's

  • @adrianlanderos6298
    @adrianlanderos6298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    You guys should test the 2.7 again, now that they make an extra 25lb ft and is paired with the 10 speed. Compare it with this one

    • @Mike-Capz83
      @Mike-Capz83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I wanna know too!

    • @69yenko65
      @69yenko65 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Same

    • @seagullsbtn
      @seagullsbtn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ditto

    • @AZ_Franco
      @AZ_Franco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Going to buy a light travel trailer soon so I would be interested in watching a detailed tow review on the 10spd too. 👌🏽

    • @mikemcc1156
      @mikemcc1156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love my 2015, but Insist I could have waited for that 10speed

  • @thedailydrive5058
    @thedailydrive5058 9 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    This is coming from a Chevy guy.. I'm SOLD on this new F-150. The aluminum body and tt engine just can't be beat. Little to no rust, and a way lighter engine with 5.3 V8 numbers. Yeah, this new truck is badass.

    • @philipketchum1407
      @philipketchum1407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I was a Silverado guy until I tested a f-150 Ecoboost. I never looked back. I just picked up my second one. Traded my 3.5L for a new 2018 2.7L. It is cat quick and fun to drive. And yes I live in Michigan and rust is a major issue.

    • @josephkool8411
      @josephkool8411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the Chevy pushrod is around the same weight if not lighter, but I'm not sure so don't ridicule me if I'm wrong.

    • @Lucky8s
      @Lucky8s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@josephkool8411
      Just from a quick search, the F150 ranges from 1846 kg to 2236 kg. 1500 is 2129 kg to 2338 kg. If you get a similarly equipped truck, I think the difference in weight is going to be significant.

    • @timothycc711
      @timothycc711 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@philipketchum1407 Just be sure to keep washing the under carriage. Dam salt slurry. The power and economy if my 2016 F150 2.7 tt is really awesome considering it's a 4wd model. Love it!.

    • @bobsundquist2039
      @bobsundquist2039 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The downside to an aluminum body is the cost of repair if you get in an accdent or ding it.

  • @calebwardenburg4727
    @calebwardenburg4727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I bought my 2018 XLT 2.7 L Ecoboost last year and it’s incredible. The truck has regularly pulled everything I’ve put behind it. On the highway I get 26+ mpg and I’ve seen around 650 miles of range with a 23 gallon tank. I’ll be keeping this thing for a long time.

    • @deifor
      @deifor ปีที่แล้ว +2

      are you still liking it?

    • @jrpriller
      @jrpriller ปีที่แล้ว

      Have towed with your 2.7 f150 and what milage did you get

    • @calebwardenburg4727
      @calebwardenburg4727 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@deifor love it. Just got home actually and 5 inch snow covered roads are no match for it with BFG KO2s in 4H. No reason to hesitate either when going out in bad weather responding to the firehouse because of my truck.

    • @calebwardenburg4727
      @calebwardenburg4727 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jrpriller yeah I’ve towed +7k many times and it takes it like a champ. 2nd gear is a workhorse going up hills and the supplemental cooler for the transmission keeps temps within safe ranges always. To be honest I haven’t really ever pulled long distance/paid attention to mileage when towing. My next trip I’ll let you know!

    • @Painfulwhale360
      @Painfulwhale360 ปีที่แล้ว

      Update?!

  • @tedschmitt178
    @tedschmitt178 7 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    People, it's not like Ford just took an existing engine and stuck a couple of turbos on it like they did in the 70's. The 2.7 was DESIGNED from the start AS A TURBO ENGINE. And they have been THOROUGHLY tested, NOT like they did in the 70's. Do more reading before assuming anything.

    • @jcortes3930
      @jcortes3930 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TED Schmitt ok

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yeah, I give Ford a lot of credit for the engineering in the 2.7 EB. The compacted graphite iron block insert is unique in the industry.

    • @josephkool8411
      @josephkool8411 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Iron block ftw

    • @shitloveaduck
      @shitloveaduck 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I have been saying this often! Yeah, the 2.7 was built like a V6 turbo diesel is built, operating as a single unit.
      I have 2 of the 2.7s on my farm and a 5.0 as my personal farm truck. We work off-road the vast majority of the time and since we work in the lower gears and lower rpms, the altitude here is 3600 - 4500 ft. The 2.7 routinely outperforms the 5.0. I was sceptical but am sold now. They were part of a package deal on 4 trucks, all 2019s. 4th truck is a F350 diesel.

    • @josephkool8411
      @josephkool8411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know

  • @blueovaltrucker
    @blueovaltrucker 9 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Just reading some comments from some of the aluminum haters here and you just have to laugh. The cabs on all of the class 8 trucks are aluminum and have been for 50 years or more and a lot of them have millions of miles on them. My father drove an old KW conventional way back in 72 until 79 or so with a co-driver with over 4 million miles on it. He rebuilt the engine several times but never had to touch the cab other than a paint job. Im pretty sure it wasnt military grade aluminum either.

    • @blueovaltrucker
      @blueovaltrucker 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Im not positive if they use military grade aluminum on the entire truck but Im sure the the thicker gauge aluminum is used for the bed area and rocker panels and such. Aluminum has been a proven alloy for so many different types of vehichles and aviation for so many years I just dont understand some of the dislike for it now.

    • @blueovaltrucker
      @blueovaltrucker 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Aluminum does not corrode to the best of my knowledge but instead oxidizes and once that occurs nothing else happens and it stays very stable.

    • @rxonmymind8362
      @rxonmymind8362 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are correct. The great example of this are Airstream trailers. 70% of all Airstream trailers that have been sold are still on the road. Some of the original ones are over 80 years old. Aluminum last.

    • @yodawg3469
      @yodawg3469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Military grade is a joke,the military buys from the lowest bidder.

    • @mmholling87
      @mmholling87 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Ben Daulton For galvanic corrosion to take place you need two disamilar metals plus an electrolyte present. In real world applications aluminum will last longer than steel. I've never seen a monell solid rivet in carbon fiber, we only use hi-locks and maxibolts. Monells are mostly used in firewalls in my experience. Ford used 6xxx series aluminum on the body of the F150. In aerospace we mostly use 2024T3 but it's not great for compound curves which is where 6xxx aluminum shines.

  • @mikecoulter5243
    @mikecoulter5243 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The 2.7 EB is the GOAT modern truck motor across all platforms, including gas and diesel. This engine paired with the 6 speed (not 10) is going to go down as one of the greats many years from now. Engineering at its finest.

    • @69yenko65
      @69yenko65 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What's wrong with the 10 speed? Closer ratios, trans is only an inch longer than the 6r80e. Co designed between two of the largest auto makers. Sign me up

    • @kalebmcdaniel9147
      @kalebmcdaniel9147 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unreliable and breaks more often

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kalebmcdaniel9147 the 10 spd is very reliable, obviously you don’t own one

  • @neilcarter77
    @neilcarter77 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, I’m from 2023/24. Turbos are everywhere and the Ranger exists with the 2.3, 2.7 and 3.0 ecoboost!

  • @MichiganPowersports
    @MichiganPowersports 5 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Just bought a 2018 f150 with the 2.7eb. This thing is absolutely incredible. The best part about having an ecoboost is ripping apart the people who hate on them. These are the best engines ive ever seen. Absolutely hands down 10/10

    • @fmxinsane
      @fmxinsane 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Any problems yet?

    • @charliethompson4378
      @charliethompson4378 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      fmxinsane I have a 2016 2.7L eco boost. It now has 24k miles and absolutely zero problems.

    • @airtexaco
      @airtexaco 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2018- zero issues.

    • @billymc2681
      @billymc2681 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      2015 XLT with 55,xxx miles with 2.7 EcoBoost. No issues or problems.

    • @RobertWilliams-ox4hz
      @RobertWilliams-ox4hz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kinda mileage are you guys getting?

  • @cperine39
    @cperine39 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "This thing is either gonna be a beer can or a fighter jet, we're gonna find out." Mr. Truck is the absolute best! Love your guys' videos so much and thank you for all you do to bring us these great reviews. And the scenery up in the beautiful Colorado mountains just makes them that much better. Keep up the good work Fast Lane Truck!

  • @dslfrk59
    @dslfrk59 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Always love watching this video. As a proud owner on a 2017 2.7 f150 I understand how peppy this engine is and how well it tows. At 39k miles no issues and still puts a smile on my face.

    • @michaelH0000
      @michaelH0000 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right!! Same here i got a xlt 2015 2.7 with 71k not one issue totally bone stock. I love it

  • @davidkoeppen3121
    @davidkoeppen3121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The crazy thing about my 2018 2.7 f 150 is it produces 400 lbs of torque @ 2750 rpms. That's almost 1000 rpms lower than the 3.5 and 2000 rpms lower than the 5.0 which equates to easy highway towing rpms. I tow a 5000 lb travel trailer and in 8th gear in tow mode its going about 65 mph at 2100 rpm and it never needs to down shift. I had to get on the interstate this week with a short on ramp with a semi in the right lane slowing down to let me in and I punched it and I was really suprised how well it merged into traffic.

  • @hawkdaddy64
    @hawkdaddy64 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I towed a 7x16 Haulmark 6' 6" interior height trailer with a headwind of 25mph and I could easily maintain 70 mph with my 2.7 2015 F150.

  • @johngarcia3920
    @johngarcia3920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    5 years no issues yet on my little 2.7 :)

    • @cameronshackelton3404
      @cameronshackelton3404 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not having any reliability issues like a lot of people claim?

  • @DS-TRUCKS
    @DS-TRUCKS 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can't wait to see the 2018 with its improved work take on the challenge!

  • @user-fz3sz2dj4r
    @user-fz3sz2dj4r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kent proved to be dead on with his analysis. Mr Truck living up to his name

  • @greatsaiyaguy271
    @greatsaiyaguy271 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The 2018 and newer 2.7 turbo ecoboosts have more power than this model year. The HP is the same (325 horses) but the torque was increased from 375 lb ft up until the 2017 model to 400 lb ft in the 2018 & newer years. Glad to see that, I always felt the 325 horses was adequate especially for a smaller displacement engine (I drove a 2005 f150 lariat 4x4 w/ the 3 valve 5.4 Triton V8 for years and still have it). That ‘05 f150 had 300 HP & 365 lbs tq. Pretty good for the era and it towed pretty well for what I needed. I drove it daily and towed a 6,250 lb boat atleast once a month for way over a decade...coming up on 14 years!!! I’ve always found the 5.4s power to be fine. It was never the fastest, most reactive, fuel efficient, powerful engine out there but it was always reliable to me (has nearly 230,000 miles now) and rarely had mechanical issues. When I heard the newer 2015+ era f150s would offer a very lightweight, smaller ecoboost as a cheaper option to the powerful 3.5 ecoboost I was curious. When I heard it would have 325 horses and 375 lb ft of tq I was very impressed. A super small 2.7 v6 twin turbocharged to produce 25 more horses and 10 more lbs tq than my big 5.4 V8?!?! Count me in. And now the engine is even more powerful with 400 lbs tq

  • @markp9247
    @markp9247 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid guys, impressive Ecoboost engine, looking forward to Ecodiesel!...

  • @jonathanroberson122
    @jonathanroberson122 9 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Nice job Ford. Just like the 3.5 Ecoboost I bet there's gonna be so many haters not willing to accept that a turbo v6 can outperform a v8

    • @MarkJones-sk6vk
      @MarkJones-sk6vk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, but can it out perform a turbo V8?

    • @visevise9492
      @visevise9492 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      No, but what company makes turbo v8s stock?

    • @kyjoe9
      @kyjoe9 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Porsche

    • @Rj-to8qm
      @Rj-to8qm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kyjoe9 what truck company

    • @Sig721Tau
      @Sig721Tau 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kyjoe9
      What a dumb ass statement to make on a video about trucks. Smh..

  • @kapuceto
    @kapuceto 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this new truck . My next truck for sure

  • @CubanRider
    @CubanRider 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Almost 30k miles on my 2.7L baby Ecoobost '15 F150. Bought it thanks in great part to this review. I love it so far. I just use it to load up a 500 lbs bike in the back for the most part, so I'm not a heavy user. Looking forward to keeping this one for a long time.

    • @MAGirlable
      @MAGirlable 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kind of deal did you get on yours from the dealership?

    • @DS-TRUCKS
      @DS-TRUCKS 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cuban Rider that's awesome!

    • @emmanuelhernandez3335
      @emmanuelhernandez3335 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is also my dream truck. I hope they don't discontinue this model in years to come. Making this small engine perform like a huge truck is like Steve Jobs starting the Iphone in the early days when nobody knew the benefits of a Windows technology. Only a Steve or a Tomas Edison like persistence and dedication can produce this 2.7L Ecoboost engine in an all aluminium body. But I would not mind if Ford would further shrink the size of the engine from 2.7L to 2.0L or even 1.6L. That would have reached the level of perfection to an art. We truck lovers will be blessed.

    • @christiangarcia4789
      @christiangarcia4789 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      $10k off on mine with a 49k msrp

    • @RedWingsninetyone
      @RedWingsninetyone 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is it holding up?

  • @theobrown1309
    @theobrown1309 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just got myself a very similar rig and if it is reliable long term it's definitely worth every dollar

  • @Fishingforbasstv
    @Fishingforbasstv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hey fellas! Love the vidoes! We need an updated 2022 f150 2.7 gauntlet 🙏

  • @gmrtg1414
    @gmrtg1414 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    One EPIC truck towing a CLASSIC truck. I like it!!

  • @1guyin10
    @1guyin10 9 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    The little 2.7 seems more than capable of doing what it needs to do. Sure will miss the V-8 rumble though.

    • @gregoryfaulkner5345
      @gregoryfaulkner5345 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Why would anyone miss the V8 unless they chose the 2.7 already? It's still the top-chosen engine and is going nowhere, because Ford wouldn't lose that market share for nothing? The 5.0 is still available and still in all the same trim levels and configurations as the 2.7 (actually more, because the 2.7 becomes unavailable at certain higher trim levels; I think anything above the Lariat; whereas the 5.0 is available from the smallest-configured XL, all the way up to King Ranch if I'm not mistaken), and it's only a few hundred dollars more than the 2.7 upgrade price. Now personally, I'm not a V8 muscle head; I much prefer the torque boost down low that turbo gas engines provide, and the added mpg that comes from smaller displacement employing them when not under heavy load; but if I were a naturally-aspired, muscle head wannabe, I'd just have chosen the Coyote V8 and would never have to miss it.

    • @dennisreynolds6915
      @dennisreynolds6915 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's gonna blow up

    • @MichiganPowersports
      @MichiganPowersports 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@dennisreynolds6915Funny how they are holding value better after 4 years than the v8s... i guess the v8s blow up a lot more.

    • @RedWingsninetyone
      @RedWingsninetyone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@MichiganPowersports research I've done shows the 2.7 is more reliable than the 3.5 or the 5.0.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dennisreynolds6915 and you were wrong

  • @MrKeyboardCommando
    @MrKeyboardCommando 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    One of the major advantages the F-150 seems to possess over the opposition is a gearbox that is willing to change down when the revs start to drop. Other trucks TFL have tested seem to hang on to a high gear long after they should have changed down.

    • @gmrtg1414
      @gmrtg1414 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I agree Ford seems to have the 6 speed down to a science and it works perfect. When they do these towing challenges with the GM 6.2 the 8 speed is always searching for the right gear which is horrible for a tranny.

    • @MrKeyboardCommando
      @MrKeyboardCommando 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** I've noticed that about GM trucks. They've got eight speeds and a bloody big V8 and don't use either of them because of the lousy programming of the gearbox.

    • @jdorf40
      @jdorf40 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MrKeyboardCommando True. But they have to set them up that way so they can tout their fuel efficiency.

    • @MrKeyboardCommando
      @MrKeyboardCommando 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Justin Giersdorf Don'y you mean, try and hide their trucks' dipsomania ?

    • @seigell9500
      @seigell9500 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Funny, because I spent the whole F-150 2.7EB Video listening to the Engine Note and watching the Tach... The Tach was fluttering between 3 and 4K, and the Exhaust Note was going Up and Down to Match... I was anxious to see if Mr Truck was going to cycle through the EIC to look at the Tranny Temp, because I was sure the Excess Shifting was going to be an Issue...

  • @tphelan86
    @tphelan86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am honestly impressed by this 2.7 eb. I think they are 100% correct that this is the engine of the future. I have a 2019 5.0. now but the 2.7 is my next choice . The 3.5 is more for the almost daily tow veh.

  • @josephkool8411
    @josephkool8411 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mine will be here in 2-4 more weeks. It takes 6-8 weeks when you order them. I got the regular cab, 6.5' bed , 4x4, vinyl seats, dark grey, 3.73 locking rear, 2.7 Ecoboost and air conditioning. I can't wait, I'm driving a 2004 Neon I bought brand new and this will a big upgrade for me, but I'm still keeping the peon because it's special to me. I'll use it for to go to work in and leave the truck at home.

    • @josephkool8411
      @josephkool8411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it has cruise control too, but I'm I'm not sure. Should be here any day now. 47 days and counting....

  • @Ron-bo6tb
    @Ron-bo6tb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have two vehicles with the 2.7 Eco engine, a 2019 F150 STX extended cab and a 2020 Lincoln Nautilus, I love both vehicles, very reliable so far.

  • @jetdust
    @jetdust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’ll be doing the Ike tomorrow with my 2018 2.7 eco pulling my 3k# trailer on my way back to Chicago... I’m sure it’ll do fine, so far the hills I’ve hit don’t even slow me down and has had more than enough power...

    • @jetdust
      @jetdust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Update, the bumpy bad condition of the gauntlet was the worst part of the drive. Stayed in 6/7 gear the entire way up didn’t break a sweat @ 65/70 mph although semi’s were almost at a stand still

  • @Molasses90
    @Molasses90 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't wait to see the all-new Super Duty trucks for 2016.

  • @jorgenwu
    @jorgenwu 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm genuinely impressed by that 2.7L. The 2015 F150 doesn't look too bad either.

  • @jippyoo7
    @jippyoo7 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    F150 = The Best

  • @Fabian7024
    @Fabian7024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just a guy that loves trucks, best job in the world.

  • @k3v015Mk
    @k3v015Mk 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good towing test guys. 2.7 is definitely a beast.

  • @dlg5485
    @dlg5485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Have you guys tested the 2nd gen 2.7 that came out in 2018? Ford made some pretty extensive upgrades, so it has more power and torque now. I'm curious if it tows any differently.

  • @Mattbr02
    @Mattbr02 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah I agree they need to do a new Ike Gauntlet with the 2018 and newer 2.7 ecoboost up and down the mountain cause it has that new 10 speed trans and more torque.

  • @codyschadegg9590
    @codyschadegg9590 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    First-every newer model ford pickup I've driven that has the gauge cluster productivity screen-11f150 xlt, 12f150 platinum, 12f250 diesel and 15f350 diesel-has a truck app screen where you can adjust trailer brake gain from the steering wheel controls. So you complain that the brake controller is in a poor location but the switch is just a redundancy. Besides who uses the brake gain lever when you're hauling butt down the road?? Pretty sure I'm checking that out at slow speed before hitting the highway. I'm not trying to argue that there aren't things ford could make more ergonomical, I'm just questioning your reason for the critique. And I'll agree, the set-up in the ram is nice. Also, you spoke about GM and an 8 speed; I thought they were working on the same 10 speed gear box with ford?
    Ultimately would love to be able to test out these new rigs like you guys do. I'm digging how the manufacturers are all pushing each other to innovate! Aluminum and gas motor forced induction from the Oval, air ride, four corner coil over and half ton diesel from ram. Nissan is still trying so that's cool (very much not sold on their body design...) not sure what GM and Toyota will come up with in the near future but I don't imagine they will sit idle. Looking forward to your towing throw down next month.

  • @JsGarage
    @JsGarage 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You can spin the tires because of all the power down low. A larger diesel pulling that weight would likely be able to lose traction too.

  • @mstripling86
    @mstripling86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I own a 2.7l v6 EcoBoost and so far I love it. I'm not sure how it will pan out long term but from what I've heard as long as you maintain them right they can last well over 200,000 miles.

    • @RedWingsninetyone
      @RedWingsninetyone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From what I've been told is just make sure you change your oil regularly (5k miles or so with full synthetic) and don't be afraid to get on it every once in a while to work those waste gates so they don't get stuck. After all that, it should be good for a long time.

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @redwings
      Oh those wastegates on my truck will never get stuck, believe me! 😬

  • @northgeorgiagaragedoor568
    @northgeorgiagaragedoor568 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What was MPG?
    With the Canyon you also did cabin sound. Knowing the ford cabin is quieter, how much quieter (under hard acceleration) ?
    And an unsolicited suggestion, when comparing similar class trucks/cars on different/separate videos, would you consider a pop-up window showing (Ike G for example) Time/MPG for each vehicle. Save me from having go back to old video and try to guess where at the end the time is to compare. Great video though

  • @ADS_DIECAST
    @ADS_DIECAST 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the new v6 in the f150 and even better it actually sounds like a turbo grand national

  • @longlivethe80s
    @longlivethe80s 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have you guys thought of doing a test with truck campers up the gauntlet?

  • @josephkool8411
    @josephkool8411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love that color

  • @Fordguy1997
    @Fordguy1997 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Lmao Roman. You just had to say "That's what she said" after "2 inches." ... Freaking hilarious
    On a different note, I assume that GMC Denali sneaking alongside you guys is going to appear in an Ike Gauntlet video soon? You guys should make a video that outlines all of the previous Ike Gauntlet times over the past two years and explain which ones are comparable based on trailer weight and which ones had heavier weight. I'm pretty confused on all of the different trailers that you've used and how much each weighed.

  • @Chris-ut6eq
    @Chris-ut6eq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is so old Andre might still be in school. Did not realize Mr Truck had an assistant before Andre.
    Lol, push button start on 'high-end' trucks, like it's a big new thing. I have 2010 cheapest version with push button start. Trucks then and now lag way behind in car interior features.

  • @ThePhotographyHobbyist
    @ThePhotographyHobbyist 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sort of wished I had waited a little longer and got the 2015 2.7 instead of the 2014 3.5. I don't need towing capacity but the 2.7 is very impressive towing. I would have liked the newer styling and less weight/better MPG of the 2015.

  • @cornypeters428
    @cornypeters428 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey you guys should do a video from the 2000 to 2007 ford and ram and chevy half tons up the IKE Gauntlet

  • @noahvargas3324
    @noahvargas3324 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like that it is essentially a 2 door with those 2 little doors than a full size 4 door

  • @Tom-ic7hw
    @Tom-ic7hw ปีที่แล้ว

    it 2023 I would love to see you drive that same truck again

  • @MrAnalFace
    @MrAnalFace 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, but I wish you would put a list of the times for the different trucks in the same class at the end of every video.

    • @TFLcar
      @TFLcar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We do this. You'll find it on TFLTruck.com.

  • @JsGarage
    @JsGarage 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really hard to beat an ecoboost for towing. Really impressed that a smaller gas turbo engine blows away a slightly larger diesel engine in performance anyways.

  • @bubbabusta8373
    @bubbabusta8373 8 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Best idea bring the ranger stick the 2.7l in it! it would kill the gm twins.

    • @brandondannys-menary3678
      @brandondannys-menary3678 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bubba busta they are all nice trucks, as long as it's American

    • @madchiller1985
      @madchiller1985 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Stuff stuff and More stuff define American. Tundra has 20% more domestic parts than either of GM’s trucks and is built in Texas. The Titan is built in Mississippi and it’s motor in Tennessee.

    • @dansuper6103
      @dansuper6103 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@madchiller1985 Buying cars from American car companies that assemble vehicles in Mexico, still do more for the US economy and jobs than buying a foreign companys car that is assembled in the US

    • @madchiller1985
      @madchiller1985 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dansuper6103 explain how. Nissan invested in a factory in Tennessee which created 7,000 direct jobs, then another 25,000 jobs through vendors and the supply chain. If no one buys those trucks it'll cost over 30,000 US jobs, that's not including their dealer network. If you give your money to a Japanese company and they reinvest it in our economy it's good for everyone

    • @willie9397
      @willie9397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ranger recently took the crown as the most American made vehicle/truck

  • @theobrown1309
    @theobrown1309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It really does get an averagepg of 20 mpg even with a trailer very impressive compared to my 2001

  • @dchawk81
    @dchawk81 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Crazy impressive truck. Almost makes me want to voluntarily get ripped off by new vehicle pricing.

  • @ericpinter29
    @ericpinter29 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    All those ecoboost engines use the speakers to make engine noise, so the motor does not really sound like what it does in the cab, open the door and rev it up and it eliminates the speaker noise. I watched that on this channel. Funny you didn't mention it.

  • @knightrider1545
    @knightrider1545 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Now they should make 1.5L twin turbo 3 cylinder ecoboost with 4.10's stock

    • @Oogiddyboogway
      @Oogiddyboogway 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They already make those they're called Honda civics

  • @motorhead883_8
    @motorhead883_8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you guys have a video with the 2019 or anyone with the 2.7 and the 10 speed?

  • @darrinallison9866
    @darrinallison9866 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wish you guys would tell people about the the new oil change cost on the Ram 3.0D and the Chevy 5.3.

  • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
    @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 3.5 ecoboost kicking the crap out of the competition in pulling is no surprise to all the people that have even experienced one. Should be of no surprise then that the 2.7 would at least be on par if not also beat the other heel biters.

  • @djayt1215
    @djayt1215 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why would you be messing with the break controls on the fly anywau?

  • @T0astedR0asted
    @T0astedR0asted 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, you guys were hinting the new Bronco having the 2.7 right in the thumbnail

  • @MarcMonson
    @MarcMonson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Fast Lane Truck next time you do an ecoboost test put a gopro in the engine bay pointed at the turbo, to see those puppies glow

  • @ericmarriott5274
    @ericmarriott5274 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think this will be my new truck

  • @Mebob2001
    @Mebob2001 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    so re-test the chev 5.3l on this since there both in the same class, and also retest the 6.2l with 8 speed, put more weight on the trailer

  • @hondaguy425able
    @hondaguy425able 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 2015 ford expedition with the 3.5l ecoboost. I was trying to tow a cadillac fleetwood like this and was told it was too much any advice?

  • @daringdevil101
    @daringdevil101 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    FAST LANE TRUCK, I heard you guys saying that the Ram gets better mileage with the ecodiesel which is what diesels are known for. But my question is, does the ecodiesel get good enough mpg to outweigh the price difference between gasoline (mpg for the f-150) and diesel???

  • @dwood2010
    @dwood2010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crazy that this was 8 years ago.

  • @msalazar89
    @msalazar89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love my 19 stx 2.7

  • @Mixwell1983
    @Mixwell1983 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And my ranger was a 3.0 v6 with 146hp and less than 200ft lb torque

  • @Brock_Landers
    @Brock_Landers 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now, I have a 2014 Ram 3500 single rear tire and the brake control in at the bottom of the center stack in the middle, do any of the other Ram models have them placed elsewhere? Also, my truck's GVWR is 12,500 and I am always pulling gooseneck trailers that have a GVWR in the neighborhood of 25,000 lbs and the truck pulls it just fine, the suspension is a different story but the Cummins is one of the best diesels ever made. I did tow a 26,000 lb gooseneck today with my other truck, a 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 with the Duramax and it handled the trailer better than my Ram did. Suspension and power. Even accelerated much quicker with the trailer.

  • @richardwillis6971
    @richardwillis6971 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I keep a truck for a long time. I presently own a 2005 Tundra. I like the Ecoboost engine but is a turbo engine good for long term ownership? Thanks

  • @Tony-ek5pf
    @Tony-ek5pf 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any data points from IKE without the trailer?

  • @l3arrett82
    @l3arrett82 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how come yall dont try cruise control?

  • @colefakename4574
    @colefakename4574 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Highlight of this entire video 3:24 All you need to see.
    How will that gage screen work in -40C? I think all gages always should be needles.
    Aluminum costs twice the amount to repair.
    Tail lights run at $800 a piece. WOW!! (LEDs are great though)
    Glad the vents are a different shape I hated the circle vents ALOT!

    • @kingdaniel3519
      @kingdaniel3519 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't suppose you are using that Edmunds video for a basis of price for the tail lights are you?

  • @5556ranger
    @5556ranger ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope you're running mobile one in that baby!

  • @Monster23700
    @Monster23700 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Pete S They put the mpg in the video and it said 4.3 mpg

  • @Pablo-ds6ip
    @Pablo-ds6ip 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys should test and challenge the trucks on off roading. It should be the F150 FX4 vs Ram 1500 TRX4 vs Chevy 1500 Z71 vs Tundra TRD and also the PRO-4 Nissan Titan?

  • @brucie7350
    @brucie7350 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    One thing I think would be useful is if they included engine and transmission temperatures during these tests. Its one thing to put your foot to the floor and climb a hill but if your transmission is cooking at 175 degrees or the coolant temperature is like 260 degrees or more, then obviously the truck isn't up to the task.

    • @hawkdaddy64
      @hawkdaddy64 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      With my above post I had a 203 degrees reading the whole way.

    • @mrhvac5393
      @mrhvac5393 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      175 is far from cooking a transmission.

    • @michaelmccracken79
      @michaelmccracken79 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well my 16 5.0 trans run 194-205 at all times towing or not, however my 07 hd 6.0 rarely goes over 155.. I've seen 206 once but I was grossing 32k

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know how you drive your truck, Brucie, but I would back out of it when the coolant temp exceeded 220F.

    • @billandalona
      @billandalona 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know your post is six years old but I just took my 2016 2.7 with a 2 1/2 inch leveling kit and 33’s on a 900 mile road trip with a 31 foot travel trailer. My temperatures transmission or radiator coolant never went above half I don’t have a digital reading. Thing I was most impressed about was I got 12.6 miles per gallon I was expecting 6 to 8 towing the trailer.

  • @mikeaziz2410
    @mikeaziz2410 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the interior of the new F150

  • @Creelyblades
    @Creelyblades 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I don't think is is fair to compare diesel mpg to gas mpg without mentioning that diesel is $.50- .80 more per gallon (or about 25%).
    Conservatively speaking a diesel's mpg has to be 20% better to be at parity with fuel costs of the equivalent gas vehicle. The Ram turbo gets a combined rating of 22 versus the fords 20, or about 10% better.
    So to pay 20% more for diesel fuel to achieve a 10% mpg advantage does not make the Ram the fuel efficiency winner.
    In a related matter the 2.7 ecoboost is a $800 option, the eco diesel is $4200.

    • @ponygt6629
      @ponygt6629 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats true, the RAM will definitely get over 8 mpg even while towing, there is nothing surprising there, but there is 1 significant loss, POWER

  • @kevinbroadway5398
    @kevinbroadway5398 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    its funny driving down the road i would never think these guys are just driving around testing trucks

  • @joshhernandez9652
    @joshhernandez9652 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you guys going to test the new Colorado or Canyon with the new diesel?

  • @dezmonasg6708
    @dezmonasg6708 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey guys ,one thing I did notice is that the ford 2.7 eco bust is noticeably louder than the 3.0 l ram going up the Ike ,the engine noise was noticeable

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you notice the 2.7 is a gas engine and the 3.0 is a diesel?
      Perhaps your whining complaint about that, you could contact ford

  • @wattcy89
    @wattcy89 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video guys, good job, cant wait for the eco diesel and sierra Ike trips. I really like the way you do the gauntlet now not giving to much credit to time because speaking for myself, when I'm towing in my truck I tend to baby it a tad in the name of mechanical empathy, I understand logistically it would be difficult, but I would love to see how the 2.7 tows in comparison to the 5.3 ect at sea level where the turbo's don't have a massive advantage, I feel a 2.7 v6 would have to be significantly better in most regards on a level playing field to make me consider this over a v8 and I doubt it will.

    • @cadillacman6305
      @cadillacman6305 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If I'm going to get bad fuel economy might as well do it with a v8.

    • @ponygt6629
      @ponygt6629 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      at sea level too the 2.7 is super fast at 1st pl;ace
      secondly, the 2.7 while costing will give amazing mpg despite its dinosaur 6 speed

    • @3rdGenGuy
      @3rdGenGuy 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cadillac Car Guy true that 2.7 got the same mpg as the chevy 6.2L
      with a lighter truck and payload.

    • @cadillacman6305
      @cadillacman6305 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sanic Exactly and the 6.2 sounds Hella better.

    • @ryancrow2876
      @ryancrow2876 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cadillac Car Guy 2.7l v6 with a 6 speed tows better at lower rpm than a 6.2l v8 8 speed and you still find something to complain about. i cant watch a single one of these videos without seeing your name all over the comments section. youre a chevy fanboy and when fords 10 speed comes out youll have nothing left to complain about except "well my piece of shit chevy still sounds better" i cant wait.

  • @paisteplayer1040
    @paisteplayer1040 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are some aftermarket cat back exhausts that make the eco's sound far better than stock.

  • @Johnsmith46392
    @Johnsmith46392 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wished they’d use this engine in the hybrid system.

  • @tgilldesign
    @tgilldesign 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any 'REAL WORLD' mpg numbers on the 2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew with 2.7 Ecoboost? What's with the 4.3 mpg that your phone showed in the video, Roman?? Is it really *that bad* of mpg when towing??

  • @777x777x777x777
    @777x777x777x777 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How come you didn't report the fuel mileage when you hit the top?

  • @MarcMonson
    @MarcMonson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the "ecodiesel" has to get better than 5.3mpg to cost less in fuel than the 2.7

  • @irishiz1258
    @irishiz1258 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I know this is a late post with that said, my question is u say you don't favor ram but the power wagon got a 77 score up the Ike the same as the f150 2.7L. The ford did it in less time, less braking, and better gas mileage, and could have done it in a even faster time. So tell me how they both get the same score. Oh, and the fords engine is less than Half the size.

    • @AD-sp5cv
      @AD-sp5cv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This truck is like a white guy it has a small penis but it gets hard and gets the job done !:)

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry about your luck dude..

  • @mikerocheleau1168
    @mikerocheleau1168 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any truck can do this once but how long will it last making it work on a regular basis

  • @herpaovang
    @herpaovang 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happened to no replacement for displacement

  • @andrewe.7907
    @andrewe.7907 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any update to 2023???
    And I know this tunnel very well. did you go over vail pass??

  • @MrChevypower
    @MrChevypower 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In another way. crew cabs with the longest beds make the best tow trucks, because the longer wheelbase adds stability

    • @1guyin10
      @1guyin10 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does take away some capacity though. Back in the 60's and 70's Ford made a "Camper Special" that was a long bed 3/4 ton standard cab (because almost every truck was std. cab) with the rear axle pushed back an extra foot or so. It was really surprising how much that helped with a heavy trailer behind it.

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember seeing those on the street back in the day

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It does make them harder to maneuver in tighter areas tho,I’m finding that out now with my 150, with stores making the slots for parking narrower for the newer nano subcompacts

  • @680ecks
    @680ecks 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just got a 2014 3.7 couldn't justify the extra cost for the engine I tow two or three times a year. I'm getting 18 mpg driving to work no highway. I wasn't sure about the aluminium being new and insurance costs didn't think there was enough advantage. I got an xlt with a bunch of stuff on it for 30k with rebates 17k more couldn't justify . I use it on weekends and to go back and forth to work maybe if it was more for work or a lot of towing ?

  • @Golden3ye
    @Golden3ye 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    what do you mean by you have to slam the doors to make sure they seal upright?

  • @ts9271
    @ts9271 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    6 years later, who knew hybrids and electric trucks would be the future