ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
- Windows 32-bit vs 64-bit Speed Test. How do the two different architectures compare in speed and performance from benchmarks, real world tests, and more!
Timestamps:
Intro 0:00
Startup 0:34
Storage 1:39
RAM Management 1:58
CPU Management 2:28
Battery Life 3:06
Wi-fi Speed 3:52
Opening Applications 4:21
Audio Editing 5:50
Video Editing 6:13
Web Browsing 6:46
File Transfer 7:01
Virus Scan 7:26
Benchmarks 7:44
Conclusion 8:56
Windows Comparisons Playlist: • Windows Speed Tests
Similar to Windows XP vs Windows Vista vs Windows 7 vs Windows 8.1 vs Windows 10 speed comparison test, but a 32-bit vs 64-bit comparison instead. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
I can't believe I'm saying this but I'm really wondering how I said "4x the speed of 32-bit" when it's not even 3x (more like 2.8x)
pls windows 10 21h1 vs 20h2 pls
I have a question. Will you ever upgrade to Windows 11 when it releases?
Edit: Nvidia is also ending support for Windows 7.
WinDOWS 11 plEASE!?!??!?!/1/1/1/1/?!/1/1/1/
Excellent video my friend... it would be cool a "Vs." of Windows XP 64bit .. against Windows 7 64bits.. :-)
There’s no such thing as x32! Is x86!
I feel like I need to address something that is causing some confusion in the comments. The test was being done on the same exact laptop, these aren't two different machines. The reason why there are two laptops on the video is because I edited two separate videos and combined it into one so everything is synchronized and it could give everyone a better idea of what to expect. I guess when I kept saying "laptops" or "both laptops", it made it sound like these were two separate machines. Everything was done on the same laptop, I just edited two different takes together. Just wanted to point that out :)
Also, yes, I know it's x86, not x32. I thought they were referred to the same thing, only to find out that x32 is not even a thing. Thank you comments section for pointing this out, because this was genuinely something I had mistaken. This is what happens when we assume lol.
You mist pin this comment
ok
4gb x86 vs 8gb x64.it's not fair
@@toi1204 he did say that he would limit the 64bit with 4gb ram , maybe he swapped it out.
you gonna change the thumbnail?
*I hope 128bit OS will soon be here!*
in a million years 😂
It will probably be supported by Windows 36
Probably until 2076
I'll wait for 512 Mbit OS instead
It is happens only when factories be able to produce memory planks at least 2^49 bytes capacity each. The most capacitance HDD now is 18TB=2^44.
“Don’t get a 32 bit windows”
Windows XP 32 bit: Am I a joke to you?
lol
the 32-bit was more popular than the 64-bit for windows xp. I guess it was just known better back then.
@@lemurmad That might have something to do with 64 bit CPUs not existing in the consumer market until 2003
@@ImDelphox Yeah, that's true. The 64-bit ver came out in 2005.
@@lemurmad wasn't that just windows 2003 server with server part removed though?
@@kokodin5895 Ive used the 64 bit version on a vm and its the exact same as the 32 bit, apart from the semi custom wallpaper saying 64-bit
The 32-bit RAM is only recognized as 3.99G, so no matter how many times you increase the RAM, it only supports 3.99G.
Not even, for some reason Windows 32bit only let you use 3.0 Gb, what I mean is that it is done on purpose by Microsoft, even if you install 4Gb ( I know that a 32bit OS should recognize 4gb) but not for Windows 32
@@AriannaEuryaleMusic I believe that's due to having to reserve a block of memory space for mapping the peripheral IO devices (video display RAM, PCI bus, etc.).
It's possible to have more than 4GB of RAM in a 32-bit OS and make use of it, but no single process will be able to allocate more than 4GB.
There is something called segmentation that lets use more than 4G
There is a fix for this for many years already, just download the fix files.
Guess who’s back guys ! Bro I was watching al of your old videos finally you make one after 2 months
It would be great to see the systems preforming with the opposite configurations as CPU speed variations could play a big role.
@@firstdayversion1015 No 2 processors run at the same speed so I was curious about reversing the config to see if that was a factor.
Nice test, surprising results. But when you say won by some time x, you should also mention total time, so we can estimate percentage. Also for multicore benchmarks it is almost 3 times higher score not 4. Overall good video.
Wow! The results are remarkable! Great vid by the way.
This is the first time I've heard other people talk about VSDC. I used to use it a lot before lol
Per your internet up/download speeds the difference is in the drivers. Since you are running identical hardware your system that has the 32 bit version running will naturally run into some pretty severe optimization problems as it's not really controlling the device (NIC) correctly. Most hardware will run either version of the drivers properly, however NIC's are particularly susceptible to this problem due to the way in which they operate. If you were to run this test on a true 32 bit machine, the issue would basically disappear assuming that machine doesn't introduce any other bottleneck issues not present on the 64 bit hardware.
The CPU-Z benchmark difference could be because CPU-Z throws a bunch of 64-bit integers at both OSs. On 64-bit, you need only a single instruction to add two 64-bit integers, on 32-bit you need multiple, Hence the giant gap.
Nice to see another video from you! I'd love to see a video detailing the differances between Win10 64 and 32 bit though... I mean, 32 bit windows 10 sounds.... exotic lol
@@danieleremin1924 why not ? Doesn"t it support all 32 bit programs except some issues on xp ones?
32 bit 10?... waste of time.
more bit= large size update = less storage
@@garyr7027 Not if you have a 32 bit CPU. I have several old 32 bit PCs running Win 10. They are still perfectly functional, and useful for the tasks I want to run on them. I also have 32 bit Linux on some, and even 32 bit Win XP. Why? Because I want to.
@@another3997 well in that case 32 bit is your only option, since a 64 bit OS won't even install on a 32 bit CPU... LOL.
See you in a few years when this has millions of views!
Ahh yes, the commenter that wants likes so he makes an unoriginal comment
same
.
just hit 1m
да что ты бл@@ть такое несёшь.
The most underrated TH-cam is back
Yes
He's gone again
Ah yes, The most underrated TH-cam
I made the mistake of thinking an old computer was running on a x86 32-processor because that OEM installed a 32-bit XP, so when I replaced XP I picked out 32-bit version of Mint only to find the computer had a 64 bit processor. I switched to the 64-bit version of the distro and there was definitely a difference in speed.
This is a great video! I have always been interested in knowing this. Thanks
The main difference is pointer size and it does make a big difference in RAM usage (on 32-bit, pointers are 4 bytes long, whereas on 64-bit they are 8)
the cpu can detect that problem
not only that it dont move 32 bits nor 64 bits it rather move 256 or more bits (quad pumped)
for this the instruction buffer is readed and analized
often that buffer TLB ect. remembers some addresses, that can speed up instructions severial times
that "machine code" is then converted to different transfers and can move a lot more data
32 bit have segments , im not certain why 32 bit dont use segments (what it actually got)
in a 8 bit instruction cpu a 16 bit bus is used for 65 k ram but with segments up to 1 MB
The legend is back
And I'm glad he is!
_visible hapi_
Yes
@@yahshua1073 thanks
lol yes
Nice video dude :D hope to see more!
Nice! I love these kinds of videos!
To clearly see the difference between x32 and x64 you need a suitable config, for example the x64 allows you to put 8 or 16gb of RAM.
I haven't looked at the config of Lenovo's X200s, but by putting SSDs in laptops, this allows the x64 to remove virtual memory which uses disk access as additional RAM, and therefore operation is much better .
Note that some of the software being used may be more optimized for 64bit Windows, and may be the reason why some of the results goes in favour of 64 bit os.
See you in a few years when this has millions of views :)
I think that the main difference between 32bit and 64bit system is the fact that 64bit system runs 64-bit instructions, which, as the name goes, carries as much as double the data compared to a 32-bit instruction which 32-bit OS uses => which is why program load up on 64-bit is often times faster.
Much more than double the data actually. Indeed it carries 2^32 times the data.
I'm rocking Windows 7 64 bit in my x230. It totally works like a charm (no Windows 10 nagging me for updates, no Cortana, etc). I'll be trying Windows LTSC 2019 soon though as browser and other apps' compatibility with Windows 7 is now slowly dwindling.
try 8.1 if u wont want 7 in a few years
@@marioandluigi2000XD windows 8.1? Why not use windows 8.1 on a virtual machine instead?
@@ZrixE_69420 because virtual machines crash all the time..
either the audio doesn't work, or theres graphical glitches in games, programs don't work ect. that happens most of the time in virtual machines
@@marioandluigi2000XD That depends on a lot of factors, such as which VM app you use, the resources available to your actual PC OS, and the resources allocated to the VM too. Some CPUs have hardware to help with virtualisation, some do not. I can assure you, there are VMs out there that run for months, 24 hours a day, without crashing.
YASSSS I WAS WAITING FOR THIS!!!!
"What"
This just solid information, the fact he did such seamless editing, guides you through everything, had to REINSTALL Windows 7 and apps twice, it's insane the little subscriber count you have. :( But, at least I have been a long term subscriber and always will be ;)
Hi TrigrZolt! I can tell you that I used to have Windows 7 but it broke this year so now I'm on a Windows 10 laptop! I missed how Windows 7 worked so thanks for showing this!
I had Microsoft Windows XP Professional with my first computer in 2002. In 2017, I purchased my second computer, which a Dell, complete with Microsoft Windows 10 Home Edition, and Microsoft Office 2016. Today, it has Microsoft Windows 10 Pro and Microsoft Office 2019 Professional. My Dell is my first computer to bear an operating system with 64-bits. This keyboard runs very well. Software problems become temporary and petty. I hope that Microsoft Windows 10 would last a lifetime.
I have a Windows 7 VM on Limbo PC x86
And why don't you create a VM that's running Windows 7
@@wctcasc 1 year later, I do have a windows 7 vm created using vmware workstation pro
@@Justarandomchineseguy And this year, I have Windows 7 on Limbo PC Emulator x86
64 bits, 32 bits, 16 bits, 8 bits, 4 bits, 2 bits, 1 bit, half of bit!, quarter of bit!!, THE WRIST GAMEEEEE!!!!
32 and 64 bit refers to the CPU bus width. It means the CPU carry out instructions, level1/2 cache, access memory in 32bits or 64bits at a time. The OS may be 64bit but it can run 32bit apps as well. Where you will see the most difference is in CPU intensive operations. Loading files, reading/writing to disk, network transfers, the bottle neck will be the i/o.
Yes I saw my laptop having 64 bits but didn't know about it, thanks for this video :)
Did you use 32bit office for both tests or 64bit office on the 64bit Windows? Also would like to see a comparison of 32bit office compared to 64 bit office on a Windows 64 installation. Would be an interesting comparison as well.
8:08 *almost three times, because if you multiply x32 result by 3, you will get a number, bigger than 64x result
Even I noticed that
ngl I like how you can run both 32 bit and 64 bit OS's on a 64 bit machine
If you have a 64-bit processor, you can install both versions, but obviously it will be better with the 64-bit one
@@Tashy0116 yeah lol
can you spend bioth $5 and $10 from $10?
@@adisonmasih I mean yeah, but you also get change back, unlike a computer where you don't get change back when you use a 32 bit OS, how would that even work lol
@@theusersf your goals are beyond my understanding
I got windows 7 up and running on my laptop, you inspired me to do it :D
lucky for you my only can OS start from windows 10 home 64bit. screw windows 10 unable to stop updates
@@koushikraj9815 Its easy to download windows 7 without usb or dvd
Ah, to be a kid again. I did this test fifteen plus years ago. And yes, I can say that when I first installed 64-bit Windows XP compared to 32-bit Windows XP everything was faster! And similarly for Windows 7.
i think a minor impacting issue was that 32bit can handle a little bit more than 4gb ram, exactly 4.2gb, and you limited the 64 bit machine to 4gb
Windows 7 was such a good looking OS.. Windows 11 is gradually brining back a nice looking GUI to Windows.
you finally back
I think you should have tried both versions on both laptops, especially when it comes to battery life.
it's the same exact laptop just recorded twice and then merged together, and you can see that in some of the footage where his hand shows on one side but seemingly disappears after going to the other side
@@alphag4mer909 While the picture is clearly cut in the middle to be able to make some comparisons I think he would have stated that it is the same device, but he is talking about "two laptops" and "both laptops". If he used only one device, the angle of the camera onto the devices would also be the same as he would most likely put the camera centered to the screen, but you can see that the alignment on the left and right is different ;)
@@logiarhythm6285 in a comment above he said it’s the same device
Could the difference be caused by the CPU? I'd suppose the CPU was expected to be mainly run 64-bit software, so perhaps it was optimized for running 64-bit code?
Let me make the video simpler
So 32 bit uses the Hard Disk to give the "files" to the RAM and then to the cpu
64 bit uses the RAM and then to the CPU. Which means "Its Faster"
An excellent test ... as well as the others by the way!
Gracias, yo tengo la teoría pero no había podido comprobarlo por no tener dos equipos iguales, la teoría es que el sistema de 64 bits usa todas las instrucciones del procesador, el de 32bits tiene que recurrir a usar instrucciones antiguas y no puede usar toda la potencia del procesador, de allí que sea mas lento e ineficiente.
You should try this test again but limiting both to only two gigs of ram.
64 bit should be inherently faster at anything that involves moving large amounts of memory around, because assembly level commands like STOSQ or MOVSQ are moving 8 bytes per word vs. 32 bit's STOSD / MOVSD. This simple optimization easily explains the faster network throughput, faster application start, and the single threaded test. Any scenario where data is being shoved around by the CPU on the data bus the 64 bit platform is twice as fast and efficient.
The higher memory use simply being a factor of the fact that for optimal performance, variables would likely be aligned on 64 bit boundaries meaning that small variables often take up the full 64 bits even when not in use. This is a natural side-effect and factor of any increase in bit-width. This can even be found on the old 16 bit architecture where bytes are often pushed as word width for alignment speed purposes. Even with its eight bit bus, the old 8088 was still faster reading from memory aligned on even numbered bytes, so odd numbered bytes were oft left empty on things like function call arguments. This was even more true on real 16 bit processors like the 8086 and 80286, where the 16 bit bus made reading just 8 bits at a time inefficient.
Much akin to how ARM's orthagnoal RISC architecture makes it many times less memory and caching efficient for code than x86/x64, but doing so gains it energy and silicon density efficiency.
asm and os dev :)
the apple and oranges in the background got me
Legend is back once again. This is a nice interesting video. It helped me understand 32x and 64x much better.
No it didn't. How could you when this guy making the video has clearly no clue what it means himself.
It's not x32 it's x86
@@sandoumir4348 its just interesting
@@JordanISmith x32 is for amd64 cpus
X32 abi
The reason everything runs faster on x64 is because the CPU is actually able to process data and instruction sets in 64bit chunks while a x32 is physically limited to half the work in the same amount of time, so it's quite possible that internet download speeds could see an improvement since the OS is performing better.
Not quite correct, as in this case, the CPU itself is 64 bit regardless of the OS. If you were comparing a 32 bit with a 64 bit CPU, then yes, you're correct. But here, internally, the CPU will organise and process data as efficiently as it can, whether 32 or 64 bit code. However, for several types of CPU operation, the 32 bit OS does indeed hold back the CPU.
@@another3997👎👎😂✅😛💋💋🤭🤭👹👹🫡🫡👺
I have a 32 bit windows 7 computer and to me, 64 bit and 32 bits versions don't matter to me. I mean, yes 32 bit windows 7 is slow, but at least you can find something else to do while you wait =). What I'm mostly worried about windows 7 computer is the design of it, and I like windows 7 designs. Thanks for posting the video btw!
Obviously, the 64-bit versions will always be better than the 32-bit versions, whether in Windows Vista, 7, 8 or 10, because the 32-bit versions are only for low-resource PCs.
Good video TrigrZolt.
epic. i really love this comparation, its a biggest change become win
I've been watching yours vids sense windows 8.1 into 7.
You should repeat the test with the OS swapped between the two laptops...just be make sure that the individual laptops did not make any difference to the performance. Even with the same hardware, performance could differ. A repeat test will clear all doubts.
Absolutely this one! Without doing this, the test is completely useless. Even though it's the same model of laptop, they have different used batteries, difference is cooling because of dirt etc. Even the temp-differences tells me that the "32-bit" laptop will CPU throttle and therefor give different benchmark results. Seriously useless test. He should have run the tests on ONE and the SAME laptop. Swapping out drives would be one way to do it.
@@dtesta Its the same laptop he did the videos separately and merged it to together
@@TechKhaled No, he did not. He even said it in the beginning that it's 2 different laptops. Did you even watch the video??
@@dtesta He postes a comment saying it's the same laptop
@@dtesta did you? it shows theyre both thinkpad x220s right there...
I was taught in school, and unless I’m forgetting something, that pretty much the only difference between 32 bit and 64 bit is that 64 bit supports more than 4 gb of ram on your computer, and 32 is only up to 4. As I got older, I realize that this is probably only relevant to older operating systems or something, because I’ve seen the difference in 64 bit architecture being more than just higher ram support
Yes
In 32-bit mode, data is read from memory 4 bytes at the same time, where as a 64-bit OS reads 8 bytes at the same time. For anything that is crunching numbers, like video conversions, memory I/O speed can be a major bottleneck. Also, when you ran 32-bit Word, Excel, etc. on both versions of the OS, it appears that the WOW64 layer that allows a 32-bit app to even run in 64-bit mode, is doing a pretty good job of supporting those apps.
The original IBM PC came with a 16-processor that runs on an otherwise 8-bit memory motherboard. The 8088 was the 8086 with half as many memory data bits. This was partly to save money, but also because the 16-bit support chips were too new to get enough. So the 8088 could only read one byte at a time, while the 8086 reads 2 bytes at a time.
@@BradHouser Actually, if you have a Pentium or any socket 7 CPU, data is read and written 64 bit at a time even if the CPU is 32 bit.
The memory bus is different than addressing.
When DDR came out, data is read and written 128 bit at a time, if you have RAM pairs.
My intel core m CPU though supports,x86 it refuses to boot iso operating systems that are 32bit
Great test!
That is right.
Monitoring temperatures in different laptops doesn't make much sense to me unless the thermal paste has been recently changed on both
It was the same laptop each time.
Nice video bro.
Nowadays windows 10 21H1 uses 2.5 - 3.0 GB of ram when idle. When I open Microsoft edge it maxes out my RAM to 4GB which is the RAM capacity I have in my 5th gen intel laptop.
You are back!! 🥳🥳
Pretty interesting, thanks!
Finally ur back!
I love u and ur content bro 💖
Fun fact: This video is older than most of the people playing Roblox.
Lol
Incoming 500,000 r/whooshes
Im i
Edit: 5000 haters incoming
fact: i am 8
you are funny.
Nice test. There are some differences, but in my opinion there is nothing to kill for.
I wanted this comparison but I never knew I wanted it
th-cam.com/video/hResISwK-V8/w-d-xo.html
I recommend installing Windows 7 Home Premium x32 for home use, on machines with only 2GB of RAM, since the 64-bit one would work very slow in certain circumstances and would require a lot of tweaking to make it acceptable, but with 3GB or 4GB or more, go for the 64bit version disabling unnecessary services and disabling graphical system animations. With 4GB of RAM they can also go with Windows 10x64 also taking into account the processor (CPU) that we have.
PS: in win7x32 (also apply tweaking and disable graphic animations and unnecessary services), same for Win10x64.
PD2: in general for all systems, use light antivirus NOD32 v5,6,8 and a good defragmenter like Auslogics Disk Defrag, and in case of using SATA1 hard disk always use win7, now if it is SATA2, it goes well with win10 ( win10 with sata1 disk is slower).
Bro I installed windows 7 professional x64 with goddamn 512 mb of ram
@@cliffhanger5777 how
@@cliffhanger5777 Yes installed, but does it work though? I think barely. Windows 10 x64 on my laptop with 4 gb of ram worked like shit.
@@Stuntmandouble08 it has nothing to do with RAM. Install and SSD.
even if you have 1GB of RAM, it's recommended to install 64bit Windows.
Yay! The Trigr is back. And when I installed windows 7, it completely recked my computer. 😡
maybe you have a UEFI BIOS instead of legacy
Maybe your CPU doesn't support it, or maybe you didn't have CSM enabled, or maybe you just didn't have compatible drivers
Modern desktops and laptop doesn't have compatibility with windows 7 and before
@@KrishnaPosts i think this too. i installed windows 7 works weird, but w10 works slow too.
Sooooooo nice! Thanks to you!❤️❤️❤️
Allow me to reply to all these questions. 32bit and 64bit have something that makes them different depending on any windows version is the amount of instructions processed. Higher the number more the amount of instructions to be processed. This instruction processing depends on many more factors which make a machine work faster or slower.
You're talking about the hardware differences between 32 and 64 bit CPU's internal architecture and memory bus etc. However, all these tests were run on the same 64 bit CPU, which deals with and optimises both 32 and 64 bit operations internally without any problems. The 32 bit OS can only work with 32 values, necessitating SOME things to be broken in to 32 bit chunks, where the 64 bit OS doesn't have to. That's why there isn't ALWAYS a 2x increase in speed.
@@another3997 I totally agree with you that is is what I meant to say.
Congratulation
Почему на этом комментарии нет лайков?
@@tanshveersingh8676 ага
Well... I do think there’s a difference when computer was made for 64 bit It is probably default it to 32 but emulation
No, x86_64 proccesors can run 16 bit code, 32 bit code and 64 bit code
Oh I didn’t know that thanks for tell that
I love your windows test
Dude literally mentioned VSDC ONCE. Best few second of my life, unlike MLT based editors such as Kdenlive and Shotcut, It supports FULL NVENC on FREAKIN WINDOWS. thanks bro you may have very well saved my main channel.
Windows 32-bit vs 64-bit speed test. Why to choose? Get all in one
96-bit
@@JadynSmells I think he was saying dual boot. But your reply is lol😂😂
64 bit
HE IS BACK!
Did you then swap and run tests? Thermal paste and other factors could be in effect here. Yes, they'll be differences but swapping the OS for the laptops *might* just paint a truer picture.
It's the same laptop, it's edited side by side
Imagine watching this video back in early 90's when the first WinNT was just released
3:55 why did you blur your 64bit taskbar?
because he wanted to hide his IP and ISP
Check your Maths for the Multi-Threaded CPU-Z Score. 64Bit is less than 3X the score of 32Bit. It is actually 2.788X the score of the 32Bit OS.
X32 abi should fix that
Is the hard drives fragmented differently? Or did you defrag the os before the test?
Yes,
I had 32 bit Win7 on my intel G2020 2.9Ghz dual core desktop.
Upgraded to 64 bit Win7 and it's really fast.
(note: I didn't knew my CPU was a 64 bit one. )
La diferencia puede ser debido a que el disco duro del pc con Win32 bits este con sectores dañados y por ende demora un poco mas
No. El explico en un comentario mas arriba que es la misma notebook pero edito el video para que puedas ver los resultados a la ves y puedas comparar. Es la misma PC corriendo ambas versiones de Windows.
Having a 32-bit processor or a 64-bit processor doesn't necessarily boost your performance or computer speed. It is just that a 32-bit processor can only use 4gb ram and not beyond it whereas a 64-bit processor can use 16eb (or exabytes)of ram , so technically you will not any difference between them unless you use a app which can consume more than 4gb of ram. Hope that helps! :)
So if I have 4gb ram I will only have 32 bit?
x32 is here
note: x32 != i386(x86)
@@dreamyghostunderthemoon No, You can have 4gb ram on any architecture (x86 or x64)
I used to think, 32bit works faster on 64 bit processor. 😅
I've 6GB ram, which is better for me.
32bit windows 8
Or
64bit windows 7 🤔🤔
can you run same test while both notebooks have 2gb ram module? and also i realized, if i install 64 bit windows 7 as uefi it is way faster than legacy boot. not boot time only, it is generally faster. so did you install 64 bit one as uefi?
Thanks for this video. Please upload same test video on laptop having 4gb ram. I really need that 🙏
In 50 years: 128 bit vs 256bit
It might be true, dude
I have a Laptop Lenovo E450 with Windows 10.. which I hate. Now my desktop has Windows 7. How do I down grade from Windows 10 to a Windows 7 on a Lenovo E450?
Can I just copy my Winows 7 from my desktop on a Flash drive and transfer it ti the Lenovo? My desktop Windows 7 is definitely 64gb.
You'd have to do a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit on the laptop.
even if you want to run 16 bits just use the compatibility mode in windows 10 it allows you to emulate a 16 bit or legacy architectures easily
soo cool
Did the 32 bit version of Windows have access to all of the cores?
yes
@@divyamthakur hmm then can you use a 32 bit windows on a pc whoch has 64 cores??
@@RRareGaming yep
@@RRareGaming cores has nothin tk do with bits,only amount of ram
@@RRareGaming
If you are going to use a TR or EPYC, it won't work. Why? Because Windows 7 or any OS that is 32-bit is too outdated and is not going to support modern TR/EPYC Chipsets. And you cannot really add support of that just like that.
Hey Trigr! Windows 11 Dev Beta release came out! So could you try and review it? If so that would be great! It is also known as Windows 11 SE according to some
Maybe the 32-bit PC has more dust in it and therefore the CPU gets warmer and the slows down for cooling more often.
If the hardware is as identicly as it could be swap the disks and make at least some of the tests again...
are these running the exact same hardware including the same models of hard drives? cause if the 64 is on a 7200 rom drive and the 32 bit windows is on a 5400rpm drive then you would naturally see a huge difference in performance. a different network card would also make a big difference although 6mbps these days is rather negligible.
Yes. It was explained above that all tests were run on the same machine, and edited to appear side by side.
You should swap the disks and run the tests again.
Ayyye he's back with another banger
nice job dude u got featured in plainrock124's video
Nice video.. Please make videos on speed test on ubuntu and windows 10
Hey, can you do the same but with newer operating systems like Windows 8 or Windows 10?
The reason is that windows 10 32 bit
has virtually no program compatibility.
@@imranqadir6544 What does it mean bro? Can you explain it a little?
@@KrishnaPosts it means that 32 bit version of windows 10 doesn't support many apps
@@divyamthakur Thankyou brother.
@@KrishnaPosts welcome 💐
You should test with 2gb or even 1gb to see if there's a noticeable difference, because i think 64bit performs badly with less than 4gb
Yea
At 4:14 he says that the max speed of 32 bit windows on the upload test was 50.82mbps when we can see it is clearly higher then that...