But the type of lullaby where you've asked your mom multiple times to keep singing even when she's insisted she was done, then proceeds to sing more for you anyway
Theres a tricky gambit to play with white, its called the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit and you get a really BIG Attack so you might wanna try it to get some fast wins.
@@cleetusdiarrheaspewer2774 he named the gambit which is enough. Do you think he can give better advice than what an IM can work out? Do you want him to tediously go through all the main lines that come off the gambit? Stfu
Eric berserked in titled Tuesday against an IM with 20 seconds no increment: I need to play faster! Eric with 9 minutes against subscribers: I need to play faster!
The Omega-Isis gambit. It happens in the Nf3 Dutch when you play 2…e5. It’s completely unknown and a gambit, although I don’t think that there are a ton of good traps in the opening.
I know I will get hate for this but gambits where you get your pieces out quickly lose their meaning when your opponent starts off with the first move, so you won't find any gambits that you like. You'll find that your lead in development doesn't mean anything when White easily trades everything off and is a pawn up in a dry position you have to try not to lose. Any gambit with black can be easily refuted, that being said, playing gambits with white is much more fun and makes more sense. If you want something aggressive as black, for e4 try the sicilian, while with d4 you can try the dutch.
Me after reading "last game is really devastating". Goes through a game "oh well, this was devastating, must have been the last one." But there's another one. After the next game "oh now this was really devastating. So this was the last one." But there's another one. Next game, Eric "Oh no my queen, my beautiful queen!". Me "Yeah right, Eric pulling another Legals mate."
Wtf did the last player think when he took the queen? I mean he took his time to think and he couldn't see the obvious follow up Erik had? I mean a 1600 should be able to see a simple mate in 2.. (like really the most obvious moves to consider) especially if his opponent sacrifices his queen and makes you think why
You wouldn't believe how with peaks at 1650 Blitz and 1800 Rapid I can still encounter these kind of very quick games... And even fall into it sometimes. It just happens, and you rightly feel like a piece of trash after that ^^'
@@danielbrunk9121 I do... And never have I blundered like that.. if someone sacs his queen with such an obvious follow up I've never blundered that I do blunder but it never follows an obvious queen sac
IM Rosen, I am hoping you can address this question please as I am sure many would like to know. Or I welcome feedback from anyone that wishes to do so. Do you allow people to take moves back in your games other than lessons? Thank you
whenever eric rosen gives you a stafford gambit, you better be willing to not give down going heavy on your goals. His voice will scare you and blow your bishops back inside their rooks, and that’ll just be how below his achievements would be going because of his own judgment on provisional sacrifices based on the current standpoint. That will always be from because going up is messing with eric and your dying wishes going to lie right here with you.
I am 1400 rated and went against a 1600, he sacrificed a Knight to open my king pawns and mate me, but he made one blunder, later on I knew he could mate me Quickly so I sacrificed a rook to place my pawn on the middle of the board since I already had 1 there and I thought "he cant stop 2 advanced pawns" so after some exchanges I had king and bishop vs his Queen, but my pawn was already at e7 so I won, I was so proud😁 never did that play before
A trap of chessers is they are usually more jester than doers, yet they are oh so nice about it. They have to, since talk, i.e. creation content, is their specialty. quote from the Origin of Specious by A. So Mouser
A trap of chessers is they are usually more jester than doers, yet they are oh so nice about it. They have to, since talk, i.e. creation content, is their specialty. quote from the Origin of Specious by A. So Mouser also, please leave, Mr Text Generator with creativity turned on to maximum
Why are all opponents blitzing like that,against an IM nonetheless?are they trying to lose faster hoping that the next game they will play someone the can actually beat?
You have to drag a piece to the point where you want it to move. but if i recall correctly, it can be turned off in settings so you should check your settings
Great game Eric, love your videos, huge fan! I have a small youtube channel too, if you have time, take a look, let me know what I could improve on, I would greatly appreciate it! Thank you!
Sufficiently skilled chess players are indiscernable from black magic. I'm struggling to get out of 1100 wondering my opponents never play this poorly. Answer: Because I don't play this well.
Do puzzles on a daily basis. Take your time to solve them correctly. Play slow time format and try to respect opening principles, avoid playing gambits and try instead to learn a solid yet simple opening (Ruy lopez or Italian) and a solid defense not overly complicated (Sicilian/Caro-Kahn/French...). Develop quickly, protect your pieces and pawns, control the center, try to "calculate" a bit and try to guess after each move what your opponent is up to, try not to overlook his moves because you're in tunnel vision masterminding your perfect mating sequence but not seeing the pending mate in one your opponent has. With a bit of practice you'll reach 1400 pretty quickly. I can assure you on every chess website the 1000>1200 rating range is muddy waters, most of the players are in this range, there are a lot of smurfers, sandbaggers, straight up cheaters and generally speaking simply more players. if you're consistent enough you will reach a less troubled area around 1300.
It's considered Rapid IRL, but in lichess 20+10 is considered Classical. That's because online games are typically just for fun and not that serious, they're also marketed towards people glued to their screens (A.K.A. short attention span) thus faster-paced.
lichess calls this classical, everything is more rapid on the internet because nobody has time to play hour long games with randos that can waste time out of spite.
Feel sorry for the opponents. It is unclear why Rosen is playing in this tournament - Play 15 minute timeframe against similar ranked opponents. Still like your content!
The last game was the most Rosen way he could've possibly finished the tournament haha.
some sort of inverted Legal mate. Crazy
Against a Levi acolyte no less
Legal's mate. So beautiful.
Okay but what if white had taken the knight instead of the queen, and after Qxg5 then Nxc7+, forking the king and rook?
@@fcusaforever2008 Lagel’s Mate
“I’m calculating… checkmate.”
LMAO.
There is a funny line where you quit chess forever after playing Eric Rosen
Lol
no then I'll be more interested in chess
@@skibidiSigma69Real ?
if i ever come across IM rosen, i’ll resign on 1d4
@@pretty_flaco i’ll resign at e4😂
I can't get enough of Rosen's lullaby voice juxtaposed with his hyper-aggressive torture your opponents play style
You’re the reason I want to get better at chess. You’re content is the best out of all the masters on TH-cam by far. Keep doing the great work my man.
💯💯💯
Levy's voice is a cup of coffee, Eric's is a lullaby.
hot chocolate
Pingas
Perfectly explained. My thoughts exactly
But the type of lullaby where you've asked your mom multiple times to keep singing even when she's insisted she was done, then proceeds to sing more for you anyway
Levy is coffee
Eric is tea
8:49
Donation:
Also this is absolutely quackalicious.
Also quack
Also hi
Also quack
Eric: also checkmate
LOL
Eric the GOAT
2w8www
It's so frustrating how little time people spend on their moves when they have twenty minutes on the clock.
Sometimes you just don't want to deal with the effort of calculating a move
@@mouwersor Then you can also play blitz :/
coz, tournament is ending in less than 20 mins?
@@nephandi2316 no, blitz makes me anxious on move 5 and I just wanna chill and see my opponent take more time than me to move.
@@nephandi2316 Yes that would be wiser.
It really truly never gets old. Has to be the best catch phrase in all of chess.
Oh no my queen! My beautiful queen!
His voice and his chess style are literally polar opposites.
I love how he can’t contain his happiness when an “Oh no, my queen!” opportunity arises
last game was so satisfying it deserves its own video
Theres a tricky gambit to play with white, its called the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit and you get a really BIG Attack so you might wanna try it to get some fast wins.
Good idea tell him it's name then say nothing else
@@cleetusdiarrheaspewer2774 chillax
@@cleetusdiarrheaspewer2774 he named the gambit which is enough. Do you think he can give better advice than what an IM can work out? Do you want him to tediously go through all the main lines that come off the gambit? Stfu
Eric already knows about this gambit and has talked about it before in a video
How do you all knows such gambits and I wonder how do he knows all the gambits lines,I want to just know from where he study all that tricky gambits
"What was I thinking!... or was I thinking... check-mate." Ha ha - brilliant.
Eric's glee when he tricks and traps his opponent literally makes my day :)
"I'll show the funny mate after the game"
-Proceeds to show the funny mate
These big smiles after each checkmate... so priceless. That's fun at work.
As a 1500 rated Caro player, you savaged me vicariously with that quick mate in your 2nd or 3rd match this video. Loved it!
I lol'd at that last game. Well played sir. - In all honesty your opponent played moves I would've xD
Eric's acting is getting better
Yessss my Sunday just got better
Opponent with White is up +7.5:
Eric: Uuh, I can win the rook, it's still interesting.
This is for sure the most content filled Eric video yet
Eric, I have been watching you for 3 years now. I started playing the stafford & won a couple of times by sacrificing my queen. Thank you ☝🏽
5:38 Lmaoooooooo. You're Evil Eric
everybody gangsta until eric finds a funny line
"oh no, my queen" followed by the checkmate was epic ! 😁
Eric Rosen is the
Check Norris of chess
😁😁😁
The last opponent deserved it. When Eric Rosen blunders his queen you DO NOT TAKE HIS QUEEN.
“Also, checkmate” 😎
The brutal hover at 8:50, somebody report this man for stalling haha
Your channel has being the best so far Eric ❤
Thanks for all the videos, I've also learnt a lot of good openings I'm using online now
3:42 why didn’t white take the knight with the king?
Ah if you look closely you can see Rosen utilizing the twinkle in his eye gambit
Eric berserked in titled Tuesday against an IM with 20 seconds no increment: I need to play faster!
Eric with 9 minutes against subscribers: I need to play faster!
"Oh no, my Queen" doesn't help against stream snipers when it is delivered with a devilish grin.
_“Oh no, my queen.. anyways”_
Nice work Eric
Any recommendations for gambits for black that I can learn? Other than the Stafford of course
The Omega-Isis gambit. It happens in the Nf3 Dutch when you play 2…e5. It’s completely unknown and a gambit, although I don’t think that there are a ton of good traps in the opening.
englund gambit
I know I will get hate for this but gambits where you get your pieces out quickly lose their meaning when your opponent starts off with the first move, so you won't find any gambits that you like. You'll find that your lead in development doesn't mean anything when White easily trades everything off and is a pawn up in a dry position you have to try not to lose. Any gambit with black can be easily refuted, that being said, playing gambits with white is much more fun and makes more sense. If you want something aggressive as black, for e4 try the sicilian, while with d4 you can try the dutch.
"Are you not ENTERTAINED?!!"
-the last game
have you ever expanded on what types of situations are more or less "positional"?
That last one was so brutal it should be ilLégal
Black and White swapped but yeah.
The last game is the definition of Eric Rosen
“Also quack, also quack, also mate” Eric Rosen
That little gasp Rosen did really sold it
The finesse was savage.
At 3:12, if KD1 why not fork with the knight to win the queen and preserve the knight?
Maybe he wanted to keep the bishop
Maybe he wanted to keep the bishop
@@taquangat2633 Ah. Missed that, thanks..
Love these vids!
Oh no, my beautiful queen... pretty funny, you almost had me.
Oh no my beautiful queen 🤣
*reads levi* "Thank you for the game LEVY, I wonder if he's related to LEVI rozman" the utter disrespect
Me after reading "last game is really devastating".
Goes through a game "oh well, this was devastating, must have been the last one." But there's another one.
After the next game "oh now this was really devastating. So this was the last one." But there's another one.
Next game, Eric "Oh no my queen, my beautiful queen!". Me "Yeah right, Eric pulling another Legals mate."
Wtf did the last player think when he took the queen? I mean he took his time to think and he couldn't see the obvious follow up Erik had? I mean a 1600 should be able to see a simple mate in 2.. (like really the most obvious moves to consider) especially if his opponent sacrifices his queen and makes you think why
they thought it was a mouseslip? maybe
You wouldn't believe how with peaks at 1650 Blitz and 1800 Rapid I can still encounter these kind of very quick games... And even fall into it sometimes. It just happens, and you rightly feel like a piece of trash after that ^^'
Play chess for yourself and you will know why
@@danielbrunk9121 I do... And never have I blundered like that.. if someone sacs his queen with such an obvious follow up I've never blundered that
I do blunder but it never follows an obvious queen sac
@@stvia Ok Kasparov.
IM Rosen, I am hoping you can address this question please as I am sure many would like to know. Or I welcome feedback from anyone that wishes to do so. Do you allow people to take moves back in your games other than lessons?
Thank you
E
@@kartedward3058 what does E mean?
I’m so angry that I actually believed you blundered a queen
It never gets old!
>calls 1300s beginners
>me: 😬
Eric, Big fan from Nepal. Play and point out mistakes made by 1600-1800 players.. I am stuck at around 1600.
whenever eric rosen gives you a stafford gambit, you better be willing to not give down going heavy on your goals. His voice will scare you and blow your bishops back inside their rooks, and that’ll just be how below his achievements would be going because of his own judgment on provisional sacrifices based on the current standpoint. That will always be from because going up is messing with eric and your dying wishes going to lie right here with you.
This guy thinks way ahead of me ha ha love the videos
Lol...it never gets old!
For a second I thought he actually blundered it 😂
How many times do we have to tell you, if Eric rosen "blunders" a queen... DONT TAKE IT
Your choice is between seeing a cool checkmate being up a queen, or seeing a 50-move endgame being down a pawn. I'd take it.
Nice reverse Legal's mate!
Againdt nc3 you gotta play the luchini gambit
Oh no! My Queen! She's broken...
Declothing white king side lmao
The funny thing in the last one is that Nxe4 is a blunder. Because dxe4 Qxg4 Nxc7+ And Black is down a Rook.
Can we get a vid on Stafford Gambit declined? XD
the last game was actually the first game my father taught me
Also quak also checkmate!!!😌😂
Let's go Brandon!!!
I laughed so hard at the last game hhahahahahah
I am 1400 rated and went against a 1600, he sacrificed a Knight to open my king pawns and mate me, but he made one blunder, later on I knew he could mate me Quickly so I sacrificed a rook to place my pawn on the middle of the board since I already had 1 there and I thought "he cant stop 2 advanced pawns" so after some exchanges I had king and bishop vs his Queen, but my pawn was already at e7 so I won, I was so proud😁 never did that play before
6:38 couldn't black knight fork Eric's rook and queen?
Bishop defends
A trap of chessers is they are usually more jester than doers, yet they are oh so nice about it. They have to, since talk, i.e. creation content, is their specialty. quote from the Origin of Specious by A. So Mouser
wut?
A trap of chessers is they are usually more jester than doers, yet they are oh so nice about it. They have to, since talk, i.e. creation content, is their specialty. quote from the Origin of Specious by A. So Mouser
also, please leave, Mr Text Generator with creativity turned on to maximum
now i have cancer.
i agree, extremely cromulent point David.
oh no! my beautiful queen :/
Nice 👍🏼
Yeah i'm around 1k but i really cannot understand those 1300s playing such wtf moves, even after thinking for so long
I AM SPEEEED
Play with high rated players. It would be good lesson for us
Wtf last one is nearly 1700 and fall for the legal trap??
He missed quackmate the second game 🙄
Good to know that 1388 rating is beginner
Obviously, especially on lichess and slow time format.
More TH-cam vids please! Eric.... please?
Why are all opponents blitzing like that,against an IM nonetheless?are they trying to lose faster hoping that the next game they will play someone the can actually beat?
how can i pre move?
Are you playing on pc or phone?
You have to drag a piece to the point where you want it to move. but if i recall correctly, it can be turned off in settings so you should check your settings
@@jestfullgremblim8002 alr thanks ♥
Does this trap work if you are white instead?
Great game Eric, love your videos, huge fan! I have a small youtube channel too, if you have time, take a look, let me know what I could improve on, I would greatly appreciate it! Thank you!
Day 12 of translating Eric's titles to Groot: "I am Groot (I am Groot)"
Sufficiently skilled chess players are indiscernable from black magic. I'm struggling to get out of 1100 wondering my opponents never play this poorly.
Answer: Because I don't play this well.
Do puzzles on a daily basis. Take your time to solve them correctly. Play slow time format and try to respect opening principles, avoid playing gambits and try instead to learn a solid yet simple opening (Ruy lopez or Italian) and a solid defense not overly complicated (Sicilian/Caro-Kahn/French...).
Develop quickly, protect your pieces and pawns, control the center, try to "calculate" a bit and try to guess after each move what your opponent is up to, try not to overlook his moves because you're in tunnel vision masterminding your perfect mating sequence but not seeing the pending mate in one your opponent has.
With a bit of practice you'll reach 1400 pretty quickly. I can assure you on every chess website the 1000>1200 rating range is muddy waters, most of the players are in this range, there are a lot of smurfers, sandbaggers, straight up cheaters and generally speaking simply more players. if you're consistent enough you will reach a less troubled area around 1300.
I don't see the point of crushing lower player!
what's he supposed to do? let them win?
Woww
This is rapid, not classical
Classical bro with 10 sec increment,🙄
It's considered Rapid IRL, but in lichess 20+10 is considered Classical. That's because online games are typically just for fun and not that serious, they're also marketed towards people glued to their screens (A.K.A. short attention span) thus faster-paced.
lichess calls this classical, everything is more rapid on the internet because nobody has time to play hour long games with randos that can waste time out of spite.
well I'm early
20+10 is rapid not classical wtf lichess
Feel sorry for the opponents. It is unclear why Rosen is playing in this tournament - Play 15 minute timeframe against similar ranked opponents. Still like your content!
First!
WHY DO YOU TALK SOOO S L O W L Y
Pin me
Okay
Okay
Let's go Brandon!!