The OVERBET BLUFF - Old School VS New School Poker Analysis Episode 4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2021
  • Welcome back to Episode 4 of the Old School VS New School Analysis series. This week we're looking at a big Overbet Bluff from a $100,000 Buy in PCA High Roller against Ivan Luca. Do you agree with the Old School take that this was a bad play or was it a High level New School play?
    Catch more great poker content at PokerGO
    USE PROMO CODE DANIEL FOR $10 Off Annual POKERGO MEMBERSHIPS:
    get.pokergo.com/binge/
    Stream Music Playlist: www.epidemicsound.com/playlis...
    Check out my MasterClass: www.masterclass.com/classes/d​...
    Use PROMO CODE KIDPOKER20 to get 20% off at www.contendersclothing.com​
    Check out my DAT Poker Podcast at podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast​... and subscribe on iTunes.
    Follow Me, Daniel Negreanu, Online Here:
    linktr.ee/dnegspoker​
    / realkidpoker​
    / ​
    / ​
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 297

  • @ArthurFonzza
    @ArthurFonzza 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Love hearing these contrasting thought processes. Reminder to those out their applying this stuff - always be aware of how much of a thinking player your opponent is. Changes everything.

  • @TheAaronpope007
    @TheAaronpope007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    New school guy here - I'm enjoying your old vs new series. Seeing your growth during and after the heads-up match has been impressive. Not many people are willing to take such drastic changes as you have. Good job :)

    • @ZeroFate643
      @ZeroFate643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Which heads up match are you referring to? Would love to see what happened to convince Daniel to pivot.

    • @TheAaronpope007
      @TheAaronpope007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ZeroFate643 Doug Polk vs Daniel.

    • @ZeroFate643
      @ZeroFate643 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheAaronpope007 awesome, thx!

  • @matthewadams3438
    @matthewadams3438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Old school Daniel: I beat nothing
    New School Daniel: He beats nothing

  • @WADATAH
    @WADATAH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This analysis series Old School vs New has been especially helpful for me as someone who has not focused on the game for some time and now getting back into it. I have always played an exploitatively and feel adding these new tools to my box will only strengthen my exploits.

  • @BlinDefender
    @BlinDefender 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This video demonstrates just how difficult poker is at the highest levels. Daniel spent over 15 mins explaining the possibilities of this hand. These pros go through this almost every hand, and they do it in a few seconds. Remarkable.

  • @cbo6034
    @cbo6034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I'm still "Old school " and learn something every hand

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Glad to hear it!

  • @JonLaTonaBass
    @JonLaTonaBass 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    As a teacher and someone who used to be a tournament dealer at the bike, I thought you did a really good job of explaining the content. Thanks so much for providing it:) your master class sessions are fantastic too!

    • @JonLaTonaBass
      @JonLaTonaBass 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PS; I’m with the new school these days. Now can you go ahead and take down Hellmuth in the 3rd match??

    • @keithkelso9872
      @keithkelso9872 ปีที่แล้ว

      He didn’t

  • @LG-me5iq
    @LG-me5iq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Keep them coming, I Love the way you explain the thought process

  • @f.prince6642
    @f.prince6642 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m glad you have this channel. I’ve been admiring your poker knowledge for years. Def has helped me make better decisions on the table. Thank you good sir

  • @pixelcultmedia4252
    @pixelcultmedia4252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for posting this stuff, Daniel. Like most people, I played a lot in the early 2000s when Harrington and Greenstein's books were my bibles. So it's really awesome that you're breaking stuff down, by comparison, to see how past observations compare against the modern game theory.

  • @somedudesdad3905
    @somedudesdad3905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved this, well done sir, super engaging, voice pitch dramatics and quality analysis for the common man to absorb.kudos

  • @rocmarc4766
    @rocmarc4766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much for these videos Daniel they are very useful, been watching you forever you are a true legend, keep up all the good work 💯

  • @supersmoo7377
    @supersmoo7377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    D-Negz, loved both breakdowns of the hand. It's great to see how much poker analysis has evolved over the last 5-10 years. Also great to see how you've changed your game with it. Keep making the superb videos, Daniel. Thank you!

  • @dayman2971
    @dayman2971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video! Absolutely love the contrast between old school (which I’m sure a lot of your viewers still identify with) and new school.

  • @johnhammersmith8487
    @johnhammersmith8487 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is helpful. Great teaching points explained very well. Thanks Daniel!

  • @michaeltremarco8062
    @michaeltremarco8062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love watching these videos, really insightful. Keep em coming DNegs

  • @edb7742
    @edb7742 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the analysis Daniel and I would love to see more like this. Thank you!

  • @pedrodvm
    @pedrodvm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great job!! Can you do an episode where you go over the time where you first came to Vegas and had to go back home to recover your bankroll and then came back to Vegas and conquered the world? What worked, what was different, how did you cope? That's the mark of a true champion, to get back up when down!! Would love to hear more about that time!

    • @nez14526
      @nez14526 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Daniel touches on this anecdote briefly in his Masterclass series, but you're probably looking for more :)

  • @bossbear7187
    @bossbear7187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great concept bro. There's something to be said for getting to the same conclusion using both approaches.
    love it.

  • @nickbnash
    @nickbnash 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this series! Thanks for the great video.

  • @davidhudson22
    @davidhudson22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this series you are doing. Not only am is it helpful to analyzing my play but it's really gotten me considering other's play based on their game theory old vs nee school

  • @robertcousens7250
    @robertcousens7250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This old/new breakdown is very helpful analysis for understanding actions. Thanks D!

  • @yikemoo
    @yikemoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It kind of sounds like a high school physics teacher trying to explain quantum mechanics. It all sounds kinda right, yet all somehow wrong.

  • @sillyarms8493
    @sillyarms8493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Who gave grandpa the solver? He's gonna kill us now.

  • @XpectedValue
    @XpectedValue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This analysis is so good. Great format. Notifications turned on sir 👍

  • @TheBinyaminyo
    @TheBinyaminyo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Daniel this is one of the best I heard, you explain everything in a great way, thank you
    Yossi from israel

  • @hanzolo8068
    @hanzolo8068 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep up the good stuff! I'm really enjoying these hand analysis videos

  • @andrewramassovalacca6950
    @andrewramassovalacca6950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful series I think about some of these hand reviews in the middle of hands

  • @Trayeeshb
    @Trayeeshb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an awesome concept Daniel! We want more💯

  • @kleinlupo86
    @kleinlupo86 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yooo awesome videos love watching you play and explain your thinking

  • @truevulgarian
    @truevulgarian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think you said you were in a unique position to do the "old school / new school" comparison.
    I remember watching you many times back in the day and you were better than almost anyone at guessing your oponent's hand. You seemed to look at it in terms of "what story is my oponent telling me? what hand can they have that makes sense based on their bets?" That seems like the starting place for the newer school thinking of ranges vs hands. I was a little confused when I started watching poker vids recently (Brad Ownen) and a little shocked by how much the game theory had advanced.

  • @lukeforbes2008
    @lukeforbes2008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice hand Dnegs and even better video that taught me a lot

  • @seansweat9451
    @seansweat9451 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very insightful. Wise to implement both old and new school approaches

  • @robzwu8463
    @robzwu8463 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So thanks for such a successful man spending time doing such thorough analyst , not many people have ability to do this , let alone willing to do this, really respect about this , and really appreciate.

  • @brodieross975
    @brodieross975 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    love these analysis vids dnegs, keep em coming

  • @willtcox
    @willtcox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've always wanted to see this exact sort of analysis series, Daniel. I always imagined a long form discussion discussing all the great poker theory through the years and what parts they got right or wrong in modern theory and range construction.
    Of course it would be fun just trying to pick the best book from any decade.
    70's: Super System (and arguably remained the best book into the 90's)
    80's: Hold'em for Advanced Players?
    90's: Pick the best poker book (Sklansky has many! Theory of Poker?)
    2000's: Harrington on Hold'em was way ahead of its time in promoting mixed strategies (in 2004!), and holds up very well for deep stack play. But nothing changed my game like Professional No Limit Hold'em Vol 1.
    2010's: So many GTO books started to get written in this timeframe it's hard to pick the best one. I'm quite partial to Jonathan Little's books, but curious if there are better ones?

  • @infinitefilms8759
    @infinitefilms8759 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    love you videos!!! keep up the good work!!

  • @KOT-KOTOFEYICH
    @KOT-KOTOFEYICH 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Daniel, I'm your huge fan from Russia. Your videos are wonderful, informative and useful for both beginners and those who have been playing for a long time. I learn from your videos and dream of mastering at least 10-20% of the skills you know. Thank you!

  • @matt22blaster
    @matt22blaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hell yeah! so glad you got a better mic. Thanks for the vid

  • @sco9932
    @sco9932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a really good video concept!

  • @riot_act9919
    @riot_act9919 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the analysis . Keep it coming

  • @abiwigglewagle
    @abiwigglewagle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Dnegs these video's are sweet! It's just great to see content from you! Can you share a hand where you lost the pot and the new school method would have changed that possibility?

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      I'll look and see if we can find some

  • @jOpaaD
    @jOpaaD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video Dnegs, you have a knack for explaining these concepts in a more understandable way.

  • @prithvirajdutta3346
    @prithvirajdutta3346 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing as always!!!

  • @TheVillagediot
    @TheVillagediot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Daniel I am really beginning to get this

  • @otgerperich8732
    @otgerperich8732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great content, Daniel.

  • @UGAfan8908
    @UGAfan8908 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love it. Would really like to know where to get charts to study, as well as, how to learn the new school exploitative way to play

    • @AH17293
      @AH17293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can Google 6 max or full ring charts and get answers. However you would need to do you own solver study as well

  • @blantant
    @blantant 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like this series. Keep it up

  • @julianproleiko1544
    @julianproleiko1544 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video! I've become a fan Daniel.

  • @dwarner9158
    @dwarner9158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the raise on the flop. Strong hand and alot of equity going to the turn vs a standard C bet

  • @billchambers4281
    @billchambers4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like the thought process and the bluff.

  • @adamo1178
    @adamo1178 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, great video 😎

  • @mattboydad5285
    @mattboydad5285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New school analysis was very well delivered their Daniel Son!

  • @MihailTokmakov
    @MihailTokmakov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i think you should also add the combinations of 5 6 that got a bit counterfitted on the turn with overpairs now beating them but overall very good vid

  • @casper5379
    @casper5379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poker was on late at night in the UK at the weekend when i was a kid, used to watch it with my dad but never had any idea what was happening lol. Awesome to see the career you have had Dnegs 👍

  • @Alanaboo912
    @Alanaboo912 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was in high school during the wsop when C Moneymaker won, and poker has changed so much. I watched poker on ESPN all the time. Its great to see you all thriving.

  • @nicodurr729
    @nicodurr729 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah also bet/check/bet looks a lot like value. I think it's the 8 on the river that opens up for that play. What if a king or ace came up? Would you still take the spot and maybe size even bigger?

  • @Morgandrake
    @Morgandrake 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    honestly these videos are comedy keep pumping them out man

  • @nicknick2236
    @nicknick2236 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poker kid vs d negs, love the 2 different lines of thought for the same hand! Can see just how much more complicated a poker mind has to be now

  • @ericchevrier6670
    @ericchevrier6670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good video. The only thing is that for that bet size, the theory advocates 60% of bluff combos--8 of them.

  • @moldigiani
    @moldigiani 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like this alot,,,Keep them comming

  • @jimmygu8388
    @jimmygu8388 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome analysis

  • @zivdascalu4145
    @zivdascalu4145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really like the old vs new videos

  • @Pow3rGaming
    @Pow3rGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good stuff. Ty DNEGS

  • @dilsadmeraler
    @dilsadmeraler 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love these videos

  • @Adrenaline-Dream
    @Adrenaline-Dream ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, thank you very much for your content. I apreciate it a lot. Would you please elaborate this spot from the view of Luca? Should he call the river more often with 99 because of the blockers to 97s as your value and without blocking Kq as your bluff or should he call with FH and straigts only? Thanks again and wish you good luck at the tables.

  • @paparahzi113
    @paparahzi113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    love the glasses DNegs... nice colour

  • @VodinhVlogs
    @VodinhVlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love the analysis. I dont agree thinking you have the combos of 79 suited due to position but agree all 33,55,66,88 combos.

    • @fabianroberntz3545
      @fabianroberntz3545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well he was the one playing so if he says he'd have it he prolly would.

    • @VodinhVlogs
      @VodinhVlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fabianroberntz3545 I’d be surprised if DNegs flatted 79 suited from +2 after a +1 open.

    • @fabianroberntz3545
      @fabianroberntz3545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VodinhVlogs not sayimg its good but he probably knows his then range then you

    • @VodinhVlogs
      @VodinhVlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fabianroberntz3545 Let’s dumb it down for you. If DNegs is a winning tourney player in the long run, a flat from an UTG/+1 open in +2 with 6 players left to act with a suited one gapper is a HUGE losing play in the long run. And DNegs is not a long term losing player. Therefore, he should rarely have 79 suited in his +2 flatting range.

  • @WanderingSoleTV
    @WanderingSoleTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    haha love the shirt! Greetings from BC!

  • @bluemagnum5005
    @bluemagnum5005 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great videos

  • @quan196
    @quan196 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Daniel

  • @javkthong7113
    @javkthong7113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great evaluation and break down of a new and old school hand analysis took a few year of me comming back to poker to get with these adjustments poker really has changed with charts excetra
    I came back playing to low - from high before and got dominated ,untill i adjusted so this new school playing style.
    It is not just at the higher bb's 2-4 5-10 or 10-20 like i used to play
    there all playing this way , because even 50c/$1 online plays have all these tools these day ,back in the day that was a level where no one had any idea of anything and was easily beatable if you could be bothered grinding it
    Now that level is 20c-40c 😂😂👍 and even there has a few with advanced thinking

  • @philipsheldon7815
    @philipsheldon7815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the shirt!!

  • @maksimburov3224
    @maksimburov3224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the best!

  • @carloswiedmaierlavin9462
    @carloswiedmaierlavin9462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks daniel, a real genious, saludos desde chile sorry formy eanglish

  • @DSing83
    @DSing83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the shirt!

  • @troymcjessy7493
    @troymcjessy7493 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think you have bluffs on the river with Axs with a straight draw and backdoor flush or pair plus backdoor flush ever?

  • @Zseventyone
    @Zseventyone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Is there a video that really explains new school theory and why "seeing where you are" is no longer en vouge?

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Try the video I did on "Ranges Explained"

    • @kyleargue1969
      @kyleargue1969 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at Jonathan Little's poker coaching videos, they are excellent!

    • @Zseventyone
      @Zseventyone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dnegspoker will do! Grumpy to think I will need to relearn poker to be competitive.

    • @MaximusMerideus
      @MaximusMerideus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr. Smith, how are you? Are you still living in Newcastle?

    • @kevinyang9014
      @kevinyang9014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I rewatched that video and couldn't really find anything explicit about this, but this is my interpretation:
      Luca opening +1 in this scenario is quite strong, his range is uncapped (can have the best hands AK+) after Daniel just calls. For this specific flop which is 536 rainbow, the majority of hands that are opening +1 in this position are still beating Daniel. When Daniel 'raises for information' and receives a call, he really doesn't gain that much information as most of Luca's range preflop that bet the board would have made the call facing a raise. So 'seeing where you are' didn't provide any new information and it's likely that you are beat by your opponent.
      I think the main idea is that you can gain knowledge based on all of your opponent's actions and 'raising to see where you are' is a very expensive way of gaining little new knowledge.

  • @llsrrll6930
    @llsrrll6930 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff! Wish I could find a video on what the new school theory actually is. I am piecing it together with these vids but I have issues determining how you figure out what a persons range would be and stuff like that. Im going to guess that its based on prior experiences playing against these guys.

    • @nez14526
      @nez14526 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are some range tables developed for pre-flop play that take into account a lot of things like when you call or raise against player at X spot, that hopefully your range will be close to 50/50 equity on a broad range of flop textures.
      This is why Daniel said that his range did not really support aces, kings, AK, pocket jacks etc because those oftentimes would have 3-bet pre-flop rather than call the opening bet.
      Post-flop play gets a bit more complicated (at least to me) and I'm still learning :)

  • @pedromilioni6314
    @pedromilioni6314 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think that there is a difference if you are short and go all in on the river? Or if he is short and you go all in. Is this move specific for the amount of chips you both have?

  • @jaycummings3349
    @jaycummings3349 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well anything that works...but your analysis being good points out the best scenario for an opponent fold relies on you making this play often enough to be called with the goods and win there also. I am wondering what you think that % of bluff for this scenario should be to get more folds. I am also a fan of Mike Caro working hard to elicit the response you happen to want from the opponent also. Thanks if you can respond. I am 60 and learned playing no limit loball in CA near the early 80's.

  • @themaestro3222
    @themaestro3222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazingly explained! #Dneg WP✌🏻

  • @GuidoSmeets385
    @GuidoSmeets385 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any suggestions for a good book on modern poker theory?

  • @HabermanMichael
    @HabermanMichael 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Daniel, do you think new school strategies can be applied against novice players? Our assumption on ranges may be off as they play different from what we expect.
    And also your videos are great!

  • @knightofcups9042
    @knightofcups9042 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great analysis although i'd speculate that you'd always be raising TT here? And 99 a decent amount of the time which would increase his range adv on flop quite a bit.

  • @sid7607
    @sid7607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loving these videos. Replaced the polker hands content very well. 😬. Just do us a favour and beat up hellmuth one time please. Backing you till the end.

  • @balazspinter3407
    @balazspinter3407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @DNegs what programs do professionals use nowadays to analyse? Do you have access to poker AIs like Libratus or Pluribus?
    Anyway, cool vid.

    • @AH17293
      @AH17293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is most likely a fair few websites that cover study strats for advanced play. Most will use piosolver to crunch the numbers as far as I know

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Piosolver

  • @parapilot09
    @parapilot09 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed this Daniel.👍 You can also add the 6 combo's of 7's to your bluffing range. So, 14 combo's of value and 18 + of bluffs.

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are 77 really a bluff though? 77 beat a lot more hands he could open with and flop a pair

    • @parapilot09
      @parapilot09 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dnegspoker👍🏼 that's a fair question, but once you bet 1.4x on the river, you're turning 77 into a bluff because as you say with that sizing, you're polarized and not merging.

    • @luisbenites4825
      @luisbenites4825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If we are tuning 22,44,77 into bluffs then we are bluffing with all non value hands, so that can't be right. What are you checking that loses sometimes?

  • @SteveWhipp
    @SteveWhipp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My biggest weakness is not bluffing enough. I'm working on it. Fully on board with "New School" range theory, just once the cards fly I tighten up too much.

  • @joeymorini7685
    @joeymorini7685 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both styles have merit, if you have a great feel for the game and experience old school is very effective, especially in person when you can read your opponent

  • @brba1978
    @brba1978 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Poker truly became a deep thinking game these years. Looks like a chess game's analysis. I'm so ignorant about poker, I could never talk about a poker hand for 18 minutes . 'Two 9s and two 2s go into a bar....' that's my analysis

  • @erics498
    @erics498 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this is a great explanation for this type of game of high stakes pros. However, in most cash games that are under $5,000 buy in, the dynamic changes and bluffs are much harder to get through. Even someone who understands GTO calls the raise with the pocket nines every time there. Why? They get paid more often than not and they are curious and it isn’t enough money to get them to worry about being wrong when they are wrong.

  • @dennycote6339
    @dennycote6339 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Daniel,
    Thank you for your humility. The fact that you're casually talking about a $100,000 buy in surprised me.
    You're so normal I forget you're one of the most successful and powerful poker players on earth.

  • @SuperYtc1
    @SuperYtc1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Bonamo sitting there already in a 2021 skill level. XD Probably on a 2030 skill level now.

  • @andrewdelacalzada6802
    @andrewdelacalzada6802 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the analaysis of both new and old school

  • @whiterose3263
    @whiterose3263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love u!

  • @UtopssAKAPJ
    @UtopssAKAPJ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm all about the new school, still learning

    • @dnegspoker
      @dnegspoker  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's a lot more complicated, but it's definitely a superior way to think about strategy.

    • @UtopssAKAPJ
      @UtopssAKAPJ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dnegspoker it so is

  • @udashin82
    @udashin82 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can u do the hand against esfandiari where he folds st.flush.......board
    was A2354 all spades . we couldn't see ur cards so i have guess of ur
    holdings. FYI....if u need the hand video i can send it to u......tnx

  • @jb-rx2ig
    @jb-rx2ig 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    22 is a fold preflop gto wise vs open right?

  • @FuzzypupPoker
    @FuzzypupPoker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is how I have been thinking before solvers. I'd look at combinatorics. Before solvers I'd use Flopzilla and Pokerstove to figure this out. Now it is natural in my head. I still do the work though. I don't have a solver because I don't have time to do it as poker is now recreational. So I watch other people do it for me.
    Most players I meet don't even think on this level, even pros. But I play 2/5 or 1/2. I could play 5/10 but then I'd be playing uncomfortably as I am pretty frugal with money. Also why play tougher opposition when I am perfectly happy making a ton of money per hour at lower stakes.
    I have made over 6 figures playing poker, all reported to the IRS, the last 15 years part time. I went pro for a while but it was too much stress. So I opened my own company and now work for myself enjoying poker for fun. Sadly I haven't been at the tables since COVID.
    Once my entire family is vaccinated I'm back.
    BTW DN, I am older than you are... but in my head I am younger. Good job on moving up to new school.