It's crazy how I am a woman , and I knew the answer was her husband immediately . Look at the Olympic track athlete who was just murdered by her boyfriend ( set on fire ) . This is the reality we live in .
@@luddity Influence is just that. It's not an automatic destination to one outcome. Plenty of children raised in good homes have gone on to select poor spouses. And people with bad upbringings have turned the tide and found a good, supportive spouse. But, as an adult, that's whom they picked. Pick better partners. But the child, as a child, has no options. They have to endure their situation as dependents until they're old enough to make their own decisions.
I thoroughly enjoy your interviews. This one especially as I love evolutionary psychology. I wish this was my professor. I love the goosebumps he’s giving himself. He’s passionate.
the only reason in my opinion women seem to have not evolved the urge for sexual variety is for so long we have been controlled, out of that desir and even killed for doing it.
There's certainly a huge level of cultural support for it. As there is for men being so aggressively invested in their wife's children in western culture. Note that in many other cultures, a man's heirs were his sisters' children, because he knew they were related to him, whereas his wife's children were a mystery. He still *had* a wife, with all the traditional domestic role relationships we westerners would recognise, but her children were her brothers' heirs.
My brain cells died reading your post. Provide evidence such as links or records in history where this took place,otherwise everyone is gonna call out the BS on this@@tealkerberus748
A husband may murder because of suspected or proved infidelity, his or hers. A man who's in unfaithful to a sex partner doesn't trust his sex partner. She can be judged guilty of infidelity but not be guilty because he is not faithful.
@@Yay-hovahWell, let's examine crime statistics. It's all men, top to bottom. So let's keep the focus on the actual criminals in society, which are male.
The most dangerous person to anyone is a narcissist who you have to rely on financially. Be that a husband, a parent or other family member, friend, a welfare system as a whole, a boss who signs the checks, whomever. Try your best early to put yourself in a position to never need anyone financially - or in the case of a toxic boss, get a different job. We all need money to live. Therefore, we are all controlled by it. That's fine...that's a reality of modern life. Kind, mentally healthy people are safe, but do not EVER rely upon a highly narcissistic person or entity for your security. And as I also stated, this includes the government. Welfare isn't a long term solution to anything, it's government control. If you find yourself in these situations, do whatever you have to and get out. It may seem comfortable for a while, but giving away your personal power in the long run is the recipe for a miserable life - emotionally, physically, and financially speaking.
@@teresamagnusson yes for sure. Also any partner who espouses the psychology/attitudes of such husbands. I have a lesbian friend who was beaten to a pulp in her twenties by her girlfriend, and once by a boyfriend she had. The psychology is identical. Also BIIG btw: in moments in history like this year, domestic violence, threats and death go up a lot!
Monogamy is not natural to humans unless they stop acting and thinking like animals and begin to understand that they are a very special creation of God created in His image: intellgent, and rational not acting based on instinc but with reason, with conscience, with love...
Monogamy is natural to humans. Non-monogamy isn’t due to the simple fact that multitasking especially when managing relationships has shown in research to be inefficient. Meaning that if many relationships are being managed, aspects of a relationship or many relationships will be neglected. When children are involved it’s chaos, their needs aren’t ever met. The Bible perfectly demonstrates this with stories of David and Solomon.
Survival is not just about evolution it is about emotion.Whole families on both sides are affected by cheating which means that although children may be produced the generational trauma caused by the event will diminish the line into the future causing more damage. The best option for survival is monogamy. He is on the right lines and mostly right but the most dangerous person is the affair partner as this causes more evolutionary damage long term because of the effect on the family
We’re no longer evolving at all…I think our species is very impressed with ourselves…you can talk yourself into any line of thinking and justify it. Have at it…whatever it is
by definition, the most adaptable-thinking ppl are evolving, and the average thoughtless ppl, aka superficial/shallow in every way, are not, bcuz they indeed are impressed with themselves in a sense, or are attached to those who are, ie narcissistic ppl. I've seen this with women who are with narc. men. I know one such woman. Had to mentally divorce my emotions from her bcuz i knew someday he might murder her, and i'd tried like hell to inform and teach subtely all the logic of how unproductive her marriage was.
It is not about cheating and more about paternal fraud. In early 2000s there was a spike of wives homicides in the middle east and the investigations concluded that the introduction of DNA testing by private labs. Eventually DNA testing without a court order was banned.
@@autoclearanceuk7191Ahahahahaha!!! Sneaky. Thanks for putting that on blast. Trust and believe, she will find out what you did. And you will still get served with divorce papers.
@@autoclearanceuk7191 then test all kids everywhere anyway because he might have been cheating too and have kids out their with other women whilst his wife is completely unaware and sacrificing all manner of her life raising their kids, while he potentially has other rugrats out there to various other baby mommas. You see what I did there? It goes both ways! Historically it's always been men that are more likely to commit infidelity. Finger pointing at women just illustrates your bias and that you're a potential threat and danger to women.
@@teresamagnusson - Overall, the incidence of misattributed parentage experiences ranges from about 0.4% to 5.9%, though it may be higher in certain populations. Wikipedia
Because all men cheat and the guilt they feel they’ll project onto women and also men know women can easily cheat because men will have sex with anything. Men will believe their own delusions about women to make themselves feel better and super when in reality you’re not. You’re genetically mutated.
@@ALTheFreeMan and the facts are that it's men who have historically been the cheaters, and yet become insanely insecure at the thought of their partners potentially being unfaithful to the point it results in Domestic Violence which is often deadly. Again, it's the cheating males projecting their own guilt onto their partners and then reacting to their self perpetuated insecurities. Males have a lot of evolution to do!
The first mother and the first father are the absence and the presence of time. Female aggression takes you future and male aggression takes your present. Women are attracted to the actions of a man and man is interested in the body of a woman. The curve aims and the corner shoots. Women identify with curves and men with corners. Women walk on their toes and men walk on their heels. Women show their legs and men show their arms. One reveals and one creates. That’s all for now
Great start, talking about a topic that desperately needs to be talked about more, *especially* by men. And then you drift off into making excuses for the number one cause of preventable death of women, instead of ways to PREVENT it!
Have you studied the rate of domestic violence by lesbian women? 68% of lesbian couples have reported DV at some point in their relationship, if not continuous; what about gay men? 11%. 68% is ridiculous!! It makes you wonder how many men are getting physically abused but never report it because ‘you gotta man up,’ especially when the women know there are no consequences for hitting a man.
@@dannydreadnought-xk4qx We have plenty of cultural examples where this pattern doesn't play out - where a man's heirs are his sisters' children, for instance, or where he doesn't have any specific heirs because all the property of the tribe belongs to the whole tribe and not to any individual. It's really only where men try to own women as the means of production of the next generation that men start murdering women on a whim - which suggests it could be just as much "my woman is my property and I can kill my property if I want to" as any anxiety over who fathered her children that is the key feature of men who kill women. Compare how these men treat the wife they think might cheat on them with how they treat the men they think she might cheat with. Objectively those other men are the real threat to their paternity of her children, but other men have a right to life, and men who think they own women don't assign that same right to life to the women they regard as property.
@@teresamagnusson He's a scientist, a behavioural scientist, exploring the root of a human phenomenon. What is he to do with his findings? Scrap them so they can't hurt your feelings?
The repeated mention of Bill Gates as if he is a man women might be presumed to want to marry unsettled me. It made me think that he is not tuned into how misogynistic and obscenely controlling Bill Gates is.
I love this podcast and I listened to this episode in its entirety. I have to say, the thumbnail on this episode is problematic and at a glance, feeds racial stereotypes. Simone made a poor decision to use the image of a black man with a red circle around his face. This podcast is far above clickbait so don’t cheapen the podcast and this episode and its brilliant guest with the use of clickbait thumbnails.
It's not because the two times when women are most often killed point to social and individual psychology, not evolutionary psychology. Women are most likely to be killed when they become pregnant and when they try to leave. And these killers admit that they killed them bc they WERE pregnant with their kid, not bc they suspect they are not. They kill the pregnant woman bc they are not ready to be fathers, which totally goes against the idea that they kill to ensure paternity. This has way more to do with the individual psychology of the man than evolutionary drives. When men who are coercive controllers kill women who are trying to leave, the other reason, it is bc they lose the benefits of that relationship that coercive control ensures. In other words, men who are aggressive sexists (as opposed to benevolent sexists) actively terrorize women they are in relationships because it BENEFITS them. They may or may not protect and provide, but they demand servitude because it benefits them. Check out both Lundy Bancroft and the Duluth model.
You know what was missing from this video? All the screaming, ad hominem attacks, dismissive retorts, grievances, contempt, talking over each other, and the general disrespect for another’s opinion, let alone reasoned deductions, and those pesky objective truths and facts that somehow keep popping up in the strangest of places-right where you won’t look. /s 😂
The generalizations are that men cheat due to opportunity, women cheat due to lack of emotional fulfilment from their partner, ie. lack of happiness in the relationship. Men in general are predatory and opportunistic.
What no way I can’t believe this I will tell you that I am 34 and still never had any relations before yes that’s right how can this you came up with be true
It would be oh so terrifying to have Bill as a life long partner and sleep next to him while a great time of vulnerability because his fruits don't project him as a God fearing man 😮
Is that the only criteria for a husband that won't kill you? What about that pastor that killed his wife recently? And not like that's the first one that's done that either...
Marriage evolved in patriarchal society where lineage and property is passed down from father to sons, in a matrilineal society the identity of the father is secondary to the mother. In matrilineal and matriarchal society violence and rape are very low. These women stay in the family home and their children are raised by uncles and brothers. The fathers stay in their family homes and raise their nephews and nieces.
To keep things in perspective. Around 300,000 women die a year from heart disease. Around 5000 are murdered. 4000 by an intimate partner. So your odds of being murdered in the US by your husband is tiny. Of course you increase those odds by behaviors such as sex outside the marriage. Not to mention 15,000 women a year die in car accidents. Arguably those individuals involved would be the more dangerous individual.
I encourage people to listen to Judge Joe Brown talk about Ike Turner and Tina Turner. He was an eye witness to both in LA, and tells a VERY different story as to who was the aggressor in that relationship. But since we are in a society that has a hard time seeing females having the capability of being a perpetrator, and a near impossible time seeing males as victims, we naturally assume the male was the at fault.
@@ccurrie9672 Right. That's the propaganda. Men = Evil, Women = Pure. Purpose? The power grab by women's advocacy groups over the past several decades in business, media, Hollywood, and politics. This is why I encourage people to watch the episode where Judge Joe Brown discusses Tina Turner and how deceptive she was. You will come away understanding Tina was no victim. She was a willing participant and just as violent in that relationship.
Men are more than capable of just walking away from a women. What happened to men are bigger and stronger ect use it and get away and stay away. Also choose better 🙃
First off I find the picture and title racist as hell. All the men who kill their wives is the most dangerous! And god knows their are plenty stories of well know white men who killed their wives . Why no use them? Death would be the most dangerous to me. I am insulted by the picture and stereotype as black men being the dangerous to women!
First off I find the picture and title racist as hell. All the men who kill their wives is the most dangerous! And god knows their are plenty stories of well know white men who killed their wives . Why no use them? Death would be the most dangerous to me. I am insulted by the picture and stereotype as black men being the dangerous to women!
The fact that it is surprising to many people that it is the woman's husband is a testament to how well women are kept safe. Yet all the time they express an apparently irrational fear of strange men.
You really believe men are protectors when your biggest threat is a man. That’s just what they wrote in the Bible to convince you they aren’t dangerous.
This statement is BS in itself. The most dangerous idea that a woman can have is to think that someone else will save and defend her. No can save you except yourself. Men has been trying to manipulate women into thinking that they are lesser beings for thousands of years. This is a gaslight as old as time. th-cam.com/video/h_V5yu1v8oo/w-d-xo.html
He is a Jew. He was born and raised in Iran and fled the civil war in Iran. He now lives in Canada. His name is Dr. Gad Saad. Read his book The Parasitic Mind. It's a good read.
The way women break up w men is horrible, abrupt, surprising, the shock is so fast they drive the man insane to the point he will destroy everything but we only place fault on the man. Man on the other hand break up w women slowly, boring, predictable.
I have to disagree with you. Women break up with men slowly. She will tell the man what is bothering her, ask him to acknowledge the problem and suggest solutions for months, sometimes years. When a woman stops “nagging”, talking about the problems, it’s not because the problems have been solved. It’s because she’s over it and ready to move on. That’s when men should pay attention;when she stops talking/caring about fixing the problems, she’s already moved on.
@@lee48lee68 that’s not breaking up. That’s the same as saying we are all dying, we are all dying from the day we are born. It would be like saying from the day we started going out we started to break up. You couldn’t go to a bank and apply that logic or apply that logic to break up a contract. If u treated a dog like that u would be seen as mean., u condition the dog to a pattern of behaviors , praising the dog for negative behavior, and then one day u change the rules and definitions and take the dog to the pound. We often say women are the most emotionally mature, so couldn’t we see this behavior or soft complaining as a preparation, as a form of practice or rehearsal, till they are ready to finally take the plunge. Meanwhile the men are more and more use to things, maybe even thinking things are better and better.
@@eval7952 I respectfully disagree. When you said women break up abruptly, it implies that woman get up one day and decide the man doesn’t matter. What I tried to explain about women, because I am one, is the breakup seems abrupt but we’ve given you chance after chance until we realize we’re wasting our time. It seems abrupt but it’s been in the making for a long time.
@@lee48lee68 oh no, I completely agree w you, women plan and plan ahead of time, and they know they’re leaving, they’re waiting for the right time. but the men do not know. The reason why men freak out when they’re broken ho is the shock, u can only be shocked if u don’t expect it.
📺 Watch the full episode here
th-cam.com/video/1g9VX34MSUA/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=TheDiaryOfACEO
I am so happy to be 62 and invisible to the opposite sex . It is a freedom I yearned for.
Really? My mother is 64 and still going strong. These theories don't work.
@@valentina47734 These theories ? Different people have different lives , there is no unifying theory between individuals and I did not propose one .
Lmao guys aren't exactly chasing 40 yr old women around looking for anything serious! Let alone alone a 60 something!! Delusional!!! Level 10
Tell that to Jlo or salma hyack...😂.@@christophernichols9707
It's crazy how I am a woman , and I knew the answer was her husband immediately . Look at the Olympic track athlete who was just murdered by her boyfriend ( set on fire ) .
This is the reality we live in .
Ladies, stay safe out there. Avoid males unless you know for certain you can trust them. Ask him point blank, what is your reaction to infidelity?
@@teresamagnusson I agree you should definitely ask him that. 🤣
i'm a middle aged man who also immediatley knew the answer.
@@GrumpyCodeMonkeyI always do.
@ChunkietaOf course. I've never cheated, and my reaction to infidelity is to walk away. I don't harm cheaters. I just leave them all the way alone.
What a pleasant guy, he just seems like he'd be someone fun to hang out with
Dangerous people are materialists and exploiters. Heart qualities missing. They might be smart, but wisdom comes only from a HEART!!
Heart is smarter than the mind it always wins.....
This entire episode was one of my favorites! I loved this guest and how knowledgeable he was. Please keep bringing people like him on the show
His name is Dr. Gad Saad. Please read his book The Parasidic Mind. It's a great read and life altering.
The most dangerous person can be a parent.
Absolutely. Children don't have a choice who they're born to. She had s choice to pick or not pick her mate.
@@bamboosho0t Mate choices are heavily influenced by parenting.
@@luddity Influence is just that. It's not an automatic destination to one outcome. Plenty of children raised in good homes have gone on to select poor spouses. And people with bad upbringings have turned the tide and found a good, supportive spouse. But, as an adult, that's whom they picked. Pick better partners.
But the child, as a child, has no options. They have to endure their situation as dependents until they're old enough to make their own decisions.
This conversation is about adult women meeting their most dangerous person.
@@bamboosho0tThis conversation is about adult women.
This whole interview was one of my favorites on this channel. Thanks!
My guy just snitched on his friends. Bet their GFs, BFs, and Spouses are wondering is he talking about me? 😂
Humans have a lot of growing to do.
Isn’t that the truth….
Nope! Evolving.
Straight up animals now
Just because something is justified doesn’t make it just.
Justified = Just
@@mgtowski395It's neither justified nor just.
It's not justified.
I thoroughly enjoy your interviews. This one especially as I love evolutionary psychology. I wish this was my professor. I love the goosebumps he’s giving himself. He’s passionate.
The most dangerous person I met is my Mom.
And still, yep.
The most dangerous person I ever met was my mother, too.
My heart goes out to all of you ❤️
Same and now one my sister tops her
Big facts! 😂
Bill Gates doesn't know if he should be complimented or insulted 😅😅
He’s too busy trying to reduce the world’s population by less than a third.
the only reason in my opinion women seem to have not evolved the urge for sexual variety is for so long we have been controlled, out of that desir and even killed for doing it.
no wonder. ever since wahmen got the vote the western world has gone to 💩💩 good job
Just watched the full episode and it went sideways at the end and was so off-putting, so glad I heard it all ....and everyone should
Yeah, he is crazy. He revealed his support for Donald Trump and his rationale. Now, it makes me doubt everything he says.
I think this is because some men feel as though they own their wives. Im sure there's an evolutionary explanation for that. ❤
There's certainly a huge level of cultural support for it. As there is for men being so aggressively invested in their wife's children in western culture.
Note that in many other cultures, a man's heirs were his sisters' children, because he knew they were related to him, whereas his wife's children were a mystery. He still *had* a wife, with all the traditional domestic role relationships we westerners would recognise, but her children were her brothers' heirs.
000ĺ @@tealkerberus748
My brain cells died reading your post. Provide evidence such as links or records in history where this took place,otherwise everyone is gonna call out the BS on this@@tealkerberus748
He told you the reason, because men want to guarantee that their DNA gets passed down rather than the gardeners.
@@scottverge938Well, making sure of that creates a lot of human rights violations toward women.
A husband may murder because of suspected or proved infidelity, his or hers. A man who's in unfaithful to a sex partner doesn't trust his sex partner. She can be judged guilty of infidelity but not be guilty because he is not faithful.
Same for a woman. She will project her guilt on to him.
@@Cougs2894Yes, but women don't unalive him.
Look at Chris Watts. He didn't just unalive his pregnant wife, he took his daughters out too.
@@teresamagnusson Yes women do. Not as often as men, but it happens.
@@Yay-hovahWell, let's examine crime statistics. It's all men, top to bottom. So let's keep the focus on the actual criminals in society, which are male.
The most dangerous person to anyone is a narcissist who you have to rely on financially. Be that a husband, a parent or other family member, friend, a welfare system as a whole, a boss who signs the checks, whomever. Try your best early to put yourself in a position to never need anyone financially - or in the case of a toxic boss, get a different job. We all need money to live. Therefore, we are all controlled by it. That's fine...that's a reality of modern life. Kind, mentally healthy people are safe, but do not EVER rely upon a highly narcissistic person or entity for your security. And as I also stated, this includes the government. Welfare isn't a long term solution to anything, it's government control. If you find yourself in these situations, do whatever you have to and get out. It may seem comfortable for a while, but giving away your personal power in the long run is the recipe for a miserable life - emotionally, physically, and financially speaking.
Let's not distract from the point. Husbands are a danger.
@@teresamagnusson yes for sure. Also any partner who espouses the psychology/attitudes of such husbands. I have a lesbian friend who was beaten to a pulp in her twenties by her girlfriend, and once by a boyfriend she had. The psychology is identical. Also BIIG btw: in moments in history like this year, domestic violence, threats and death go up a lot!
Monogamy is not natural to humans unless they stop acting and thinking like animals and begin to understand that they are a very special creation of God created in His image: intellgent, and rational not acting based on instinc but with reason, with conscience, with love...
Monogamy is natural to humans. Non-monogamy isn’t due to the simple fact that multitasking especially when managing relationships has shown in research to be inefficient. Meaning that if many relationships are being managed, aspects of a relationship or many relationships will be neglected. When children are involved it’s chaos, their needs aren’t ever met. The Bible perfectly demonstrates this with stories of David and Solomon.
Lifetime monogamy might not be natural but serial monogamy might be. There is no god and we are absolutely still animals.
Exactly
shopping for superior genes? give it time...bioengineering is working on it.
Stop with the bible thumping, please.
Survival is not just about evolution it is about emotion.Whole families on both sides are affected by cheating which means that although children may be produced the generational trauma caused by the event will diminish the line into the future causing more damage. The best option for survival is monogamy. He is on the right lines and mostly right but the most dangerous person is the affair partner as this causes more evolutionary damage long term because of the effect on the family
The unhinged husband is the one who is the most damaging.
We’re no longer evolving at all…I think our species is very impressed with ourselves…you can talk yourself into any line of thinking and justify it. Have at it…whatever it is
by definition, the most adaptable-thinking ppl are evolving, and the average thoughtless ppl, aka superficial/shallow in every way, are not, bcuz they indeed are impressed with themselves in a sense, or are attached to those who are, ie narcissistic ppl. I've seen this with women who are with narc. men. I know one such woman. Had to mentally divorce my emotions from her bcuz i knew someday he might murder her, and i'd tried like hell to inform and teach subtely all the logic of how unproductive her marriage was.
Personally I would rather go for an intelligent and then a sporty man. Cheating will always be a selfish decision someone makes.
It is not about cheating and more about paternal fraud. In early 2000s there was a spike of wives homicides in the middle east and the investigations concluded that the introduction of DNA testing by private labs. Eventually DNA testing without a court order was banned.
at your age you get what you get lady. you´re not 20 anymore
Her son. Childbirth death rate is higher than any murder rate.
You just caused a whole lotta issues for your friends…
Can't cause something they didn't allow
We don't all have the desire to stray.
Women don't even like men compared with how much men like women
When it comes to self-destruction and sabotaging, one might say that they are the most dangerous person to themselves
Test the kids DNA guys.
And get served with divorce papers. Women are no longer tolerating this nonsense.
@@teresamagnusson - do not tell her of course.
Unless the kid is not yours, then tell her in front of her whole family.
@@autoclearanceuk7191Ahahahahaha!!! Sneaky. Thanks for putting that on blast. Trust and believe, she will find out what you did. And you will still get served with divorce papers.
@@autoclearanceuk7191 then test all kids everywhere anyway because he might have been cheating too and have kids out their with other women whilst his wife is completely unaware and sacrificing all manner of her life raising their kids, while he potentially has other rugrats out there to various other baby mommas. You see what I did there? It goes both ways!
Historically it's always been men that are more likely to commit infidelity. Finger pointing at women just illustrates your bias and that you're a potential threat and danger to women.
@@teresamagnusson - Overall, the incidence of misattributed parentage experiences ranges from about 0.4% to 5.9%, though it may be higher in certain populations. Wikipedia
A psychopath.
The red pill community has been having this discussion for years!
Because all men cheat and the guilt they feel they’ll project onto women and also men know women can easily cheat because men will have sex with anything. Men will believe their own delusions about women to make themselves feel better and super when in reality you’re not. You’re genetically mutated.
From the unhinged male's point of view.
@@teresamagnusson Maybe so, but the facts remain the same!
@@ALTheFreeManUnhinged males can't understand or discuss factual information. They're too unhinged.
@@ALTheFreeMan and the facts are that it's men who have historically been the cheaters, and yet become insanely insecure at the thought of their partners potentially being unfaithful to the point it results in Domestic Violence which is often deadly. Again, it's the cheating males projecting their own guilt onto their partners and then reacting to their self perpetuated insecurities.
Males have a lot of evolution to do!
The first mother and the first father are the absence and the presence of time. Female aggression takes you future and male aggression takes your present. Women are attracted to the actions of a man and man is interested in the body of a woman.
The curve aims and the corner shoots.
Women identify with curves and men with corners.
Women walk on their toes and men walk on their heels. Women show their legs and men show their arms. One reveals and one creates. That’s all for now
Unhinged rambling
I love what you wrote ! Abstract , stunning.
Explain the "corner" part. Thanks
I wonder who the most dangerous person in a man's life is
He has a right to his opinion, but I disagree.
His opinion is based in studies and not anecdotes.
What part of this do you disagree with?
A man who says No
Heyyy Joe
Great start, talking about a topic that desperately needs to be talked about more, *especially* by men.
And then you drift off into making excuses for the number one cause of preventable death of women, instead of ways to PREVENT it!
Have you studied the rate of domestic violence by lesbian women? 68% of lesbian couples have reported DV at some point in their relationship, if not continuous; what about gay men? 11%.
68% is ridiculous!! It makes you wonder how many men are getting physically abused but never report it because ‘you gotta man up,’ especially when the women know there are no consequences for hitting a man.
I'm not sure that an explanation is an excuse.
@@dannydreadnought-xk4qx We have plenty of cultural examples where this pattern doesn't play out - where a man's heirs are his sisters' children, for instance, or where he doesn't have any specific heirs because all the property of the tribe belongs to the whole tribe and not to any individual.
It's really only where men try to own women as the means of production of the next generation that men start murdering women on a whim - which suggests it could be just as much "my woman is my property and I can kill my property if I want to" as any anxiety over who fathered her children that is the key feature of men who kill women.
Compare how these men treat the wife they think might cheat on them with how they treat the men they think she might cheat with. Objectively those other men are the real threat to their paternity of her children, but other men have a right to life, and men who think they own women don't assign that same right to life to the women they regard as property.
@@dannydreadnought-xk4qxIn this case, it is.
@@teresamagnusson He's a scientist, a behavioural scientist, exploring the root of a human phenomenon. What is he to do with his findings? Scrap them so they can't hurt your feelings?
11:00 Treba Society (Polyandry)
As a woman, bringing bill gates in the picture makes me feel sick. Overall I don’t feel good with the way this man is speaking.
Trust your gut
He is dodgy Zionist
What did he say that upset you? That Bill Gates isn't the type of man most women would want to have children with?
Same. He is off for sure.
The repeated mention of Bill Gates as if he is a man women might be presumed to want to marry unsettled me. It made me think that he is not tuned into how misogynistic and obscenely controlling Bill Gates is.
Yeah nah this ain't it not saying it's ok but I think enough time and empathy has been given on the subject doc
Why Ike and Tina as clickbait??🙄
Probably because he mentioned Detroit in his spiel.
Also very well documented DV by a single pic
Isn’t that exponentially obvious?!
@@robynography7487 it could be ANYONE really... I thought there was an exponential reference...
Lmfao, yeah….probably not the best choice - but maybe the right one?
I got it!
I love this podcast and I listened to this episode in its entirety. I have to say, the thumbnail on this episode is problematic and at a glance, feeds racial stereotypes. Simone made a poor decision to use the image of a black man with a red circle around his face. This podcast is far above clickbait so don’t cheapen the podcast and this episode and its brilliant guest with the use of clickbait thumbnails.
That is no random black man with a red circle around his face; that is notorious wife abuser Ike Turner, hence relevant to this discussion.
Is this not common sense?
Common sense ain't so common
It's not because the two times when women are most often killed point to social and individual psychology, not evolutionary psychology. Women are most likely to be killed when they become pregnant and when they try to leave. And these killers admit that they killed them bc they WERE pregnant with their kid, not bc they suspect they are not. They kill the pregnant woman bc they are not ready to be fathers, which totally goes against the idea that they kill to ensure paternity. This has way more to do with the individual psychology of the man than evolutionary drives. When men who are coercive controllers kill women who are trying to leave, the other reason, it is bc they lose the benefits of that relationship that coercive control ensures. In other words, men who are aggressive sexists (as opposed to benevolent sexists) actively terrorize women they are in relationships because it BENEFITS them. They may or may not protect and provide, but they demand servitude because it benefits them. Check out both Lundy Bancroft and the Duluth model.
You know what was missing from this video?
All the screaming, ad hominem attacks, dismissive retorts, grievances, contempt, talking over each other, and the general disrespect for another’s opinion, let alone reasoned deductions, and those pesky objective truths and facts that somehow keep popping up in the strangest of places-right where you won’t look.
/s 😂
Mostly suspected infidelity. Tell the truth 🤷🏾♀️🙄
A liberal
The podcasts demonstrate how much time they spend thinking about smex.
Women also cheat coz of financial troubles. 😶🤯
The generalizations are that men cheat due to opportunity, women cheat due to lack of emotional fulfilment from their partner, ie. lack of happiness in the relationship. Men in general are predatory and opportunistic.
Her husband
Who women were victorian prudes? Men discovered years ago in this new centry of sex, internet and variety. Look around dude.
Dude what bullshit. Have you seen the wife today
What no way I can’t believe this I will tell you that I am 34 and still never had any relations before yes that’s right how can this you came up with be true
It would be oh so terrifying to have Bill as a life long partner and sleep next to him while a great time of vulnerability because his fruits don't project him as a God fearing man 😮
Is that the only criteria for a husband that won't kill you? What about that pastor that killed his wife recently? And not like that's the first one that's done that either...
Marriage evolved in patriarchal society where lineage and property is passed down from father to sons, in a matrilineal society the identity of the father is secondary to the mother. In matrilineal and matriarchal society violence and rape are very low. These women stay in the family home and their children are raised by uncles and brothers. The fathers stay in their family homes and raise their nephews and nieces.
To keep things in perspective. Around 300,000 women die a year from heart disease. Around 5000 are murdered. 4000 by an intimate partner. So your odds of being murdered in the US by your husband is tiny. Of course you increase those odds by behaviors such as sex outside the marriage. Not to mention 15,000 women a year die in car accidents. Arguably those individuals involved would be the more dangerous individual.
I encourage people to listen to Judge Joe Brown talk about Ike Turner and Tina Turner. He was an eye witness to both in LA, and tells a VERY different story as to who was the aggressor in that relationship. But since we are in a society that has a hard time seeing females having the capability of being a perpetrator, and a near impossible time seeing males as victims, we naturally assume the male was the at fault.
We were told he was at fault, we were told he beat her.........................
@@ccurrie9672 Right. That's the propaganda. Men = Evil, Women = Pure. Purpose? The power grab by women's advocacy groups over the past several decades in business, media, Hollywood, and politics. This is why I encourage people to watch the episode where Judge Joe Brown discusses Tina Turner and how deceptive she was. You will come away understanding Tina was no victim. She was a willing participant and just as violent in that relationship.
Men are more than capable of just walking away from a women. What happened to men are bigger and stronger ect use it and get away and stay away. Also choose better 🙃
First off I find the picture and title racist as hell. All the men who kill their wives is the most dangerous! And god knows their are plenty stories of well know white men who killed their wives . Why no use them? Death would be the most dangerous to me. I am insulted by the picture and stereotype as black men being the dangerous to women!
First off I find the picture and title racist as hell. All the men who kill their wives is the most dangerous! And god knows their are plenty stories of well know white men who killed their wives . Why no use them? Death would be the most dangerous to me. I am insulted by the picture and stereotype as black men being the dangerous to women!
A man. Any man.
A white male...
The fact that it is surprising to many people that it is the woman's husband is a testament to how well women are kept safe. Yet all the time they express an apparently irrational fear of strange men.
FemiNarcissists
Ok Gadd!!! Thank U R Typically so right wing I turn you off but this In enjoyed
God made men as caretakers and defenders. Only if you reject God does this BS make sense.. 🙄
Some women just cannot be saved....smh
@@GepsenLuvMales were never caretakers or defenders.
You really believe men are protectors when your biggest threat is a man. That’s just what they wrote in the Bible to convince you they aren’t dangerous.
This statement is BS in itself. The most dangerous idea that a woman can have is to think that someone else will save and defend her. No can save you except yourself. Men has been trying to manipulate women into thinking that they are lesser beings for thousands of years. This is a gaslight as old as time. th-cam.com/video/h_V5yu1v8oo/w-d-xo.html
I was thinking a Muslim man
He is a Jew. He was born and raised in Iran and fled the civil war in Iran. He now lives in Canada. His name is Dr. Gad Saad. Read his book The Parasitic Mind. It's a good read.
@@elizabethpieters7798Abrahamic religions make men very dangerous.
@@elizabethpieters7798 I was answering the question to the video.
First ❤
Evolutionary perspectives miss the point by farrr.
The way women break up w men is horrible, abrupt, surprising, the shock is so fast they drive the man insane to the point he will destroy everything but we only place fault on the man.
Man on the other hand break up w women slowly, boring, predictable.
I have to disagree with you. Women break up with men slowly. She will tell the man what is bothering her, ask him to acknowledge the problem and suggest solutions for months, sometimes years. When a woman stops “nagging”, talking about the problems, it’s not because the problems have been solved. It’s because she’s over it and ready to move on. That’s when men should pay attention;when she stops talking/caring about fixing the problems, she’s already moved on.
@@lee48lee68 that’s not breaking up.
That’s the same as saying we are all dying, we are all dying from the day we are born.
It would be like saying from the day we started going out we started to break up.
You couldn’t go to a bank and apply that logic or apply that logic to break up a contract.
If u treated a dog like that u would be seen as mean.,
u condition the dog to a pattern of behaviors , praising the dog for negative behavior, and then one day u change the rules and definitions and take the dog to the pound.
We often say women are the most emotionally mature, so couldn’t we see this behavior or soft complaining as a preparation, as a form of practice or rehearsal, till they are ready to finally take the plunge. Meanwhile the men are more and more use to things, maybe even thinking things are better and better.
@@eval7952 I respectfully disagree. When you said women break up abruptly, it implies that woman get up one day and decide the man doesn’t matter. What I tried to explain about women, because I am one, is the breakup seems abrupt but we’ve given you chance after chance until we realize we’re wasting our time. It seems abrupt but it’s been in the making for a long time.
@@lee48lee68 oh no, I completely agree w you, women plan and plan ahead of time, and they know they’re leaving, they’re waiting for the right time.
but the men do not know. The reason why men freak out when they’re broken ho is the shock, u can only be shocked if u don’t expect it.
Love Gad Saad…😂 King Honey Badger himself. He is funny and pleasant and so not putting up with any BS. Respect.🫡
The most dangerous person I’ve ever met is my mom 🩴💥 😮
Lol
Which is exactly why you probably hate women and that make you even more dangerous than the average man.