Should the US Use its Diplomatic and Military Power Around the Globe to Ensure America’s Security?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @preston3255
    @preston3255 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I hope the cadets at VMI recognize the absolute failure of the policies promoted by Bolton and the rest of the neocon establishment. I also hope that Vivek continues to tour military academies around this country challenging the orthodoxy that has locked us into these debacles of the past 25 years.
    Thank you to Vivek for putting forth a concise argument against this ridiculous foreign policy that our country has maintained. We need someone like you who can talk sense to tomorrow’s military leaders. Please give similar debates and talks at West Point, Annapolis, and Colorado Springs.

  • @DamplyDoo
    @DamplyDoo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's nice to see a debate. And yes I very much detest the neocons and Bolton, but I like that these debates are happening.

  • @jginda1
    @jginda1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Bolton is a ghoul

  • @Roshand-pl9tn
    @Roshand-pl9tn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vivek said it in one of his presidential debates. Experience does not equate with wisdom.

  • @cadee.1948
    @cadee.1948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The fact that Bolton thought he could explain away Afganistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya if only given three more hours is both horrific and comical. This man should never be asked for his opinion again, or he should take his butt and go fight with the troops he advises we should send.

    • @johnnotrealname8168
      @johnnotrealname8168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sending troops can be a valid Foreign-Policy measure.

    • @kirannnnnn
      @kirannnnnn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnnotrealname8168 I read countries are signatory to UN charter
      Country only allowed to send their army under UN peace keepers
      Sanctions are illegal under UN charter
      Only UN has authority to impose sanctions

    • @johnnotrealname8168
      @johnnotrealname8168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kirannnnnn None of that is true. The United Nations is better understood as a Charter to accommodate nations in a framework. Even then sanctions are not illegal and Countries can send forces outside the charter.

    • @kirannnnnn
      @kirannnnnn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnnotrealname8168 After World war two the western countries created a charter to follow international rules based order
      Countries who are signatory to UN charter must abide by the rules based order

    • @johnnotrealname8168
      @johnnotrealname8168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kirannnnnn Dude, idealism is stupid and you know it. The rules have been fudged by signatories the whole time without U.N. reproach.

  • @LazYevgen
    @LazYevgen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In a series of interviews with American film director Oliver Stone, Putin said he inquired about Russia joining the alliance when then U.S. President Bill Clinton visited Moscow in 2000.
    So, there would be no problems at all if the US would accept this idea. Huh?

  • @hritikbishnoi6989
    @hritikbishnoi6989 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    33:00

  • @zeaven1094
    @zeaven1094 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The biggest problem is that Western countries never abide by the various agreements reached. From the Cold War to today, too many treaties have been torn up. Of course, these leaders can use democracy as an excuse, but this also makes it difficult for other countries to trust Western countries.

  • @johnnotrealname8168
    @johnnotrealname8168 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For anyone wondering, Western sources agree that Crimeans would prefer to be a part of Russia. I mean Gallup polls and surveys by Open Democracy I think. Crimea ought to be a bargaining chip to get a deal on the occupied Ukrainian territories.