- 505
- 5 674 424
Steamboat Institute
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2017
The Steamboat Institute promotes America's first principles and inspires active involvement in the defense of liberty. We stand for the following five founding principles:
1) Limited government
2) Limited taxes and fiscal responsibility
3) Free market capitalism
4) Strong national defense
5) Individual rights and responsibilities
The Steamboat Institute is an educational organization recognized as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code-and we are here to educate. We are here to help provide tools, information, and inspiration to those who hold the Founding Principles of the nation dear.
1) Limited government
2) Limited taxes and fiscal responsibility
3) Free market capitalism
4) Strong national defense
5) Individual rights and responsibilities
The Steamboat Institute is an educational organization recognized as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code-and we are here to educate. We are here to help provide tools, information, and inspiration to those who hold the Founding Principles of the nation dear.
Steamboat Institute: What We Do
Inspiring Americans to Greatness since 2008
Visit our website to learn more about our mission and how you can support us: steamboatinstitute.org/
Visit our website to learn more about our mission and how you can support us: steamboatinstitute.org/
มุมมอง: 91
วีดีโอ
Thank you Steamboat Institute!
มุมมอง 14621 วันที่ผ่านมา
If you are interested in learning more about us or supporting our mission, visit our website at: steamboatinstitute.org.
Hear from Tony Blankley Fellow Brad Polumbo!
มุมมอง 43หลายเดือนก่อน
Hear from Tony Blankley Fellow Brad Polumbo!
Happy Colorado Gives Day from The Steamboat Institute!
มุมมอง 45หลายเดือนก่อน
Happy Colorado Gives Day from The Steamboat Institute!
Support The Steamboat Institute on Colorado Gives Day!
มุมมอง 31หลายเดือนก่อน
Support The Steamboat Institute on Colorado Gives Day!
Should the U.S. Reinstate a Draft for Mandatory Military Service?
มุมมอง 249หลายเดือนก่อน
Should the U.S. Reinstate a Draft for Mandatory Military Service?
Will Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains Create a Fairer Economy?
มุมมอง 2082 หลายเดือนก่อน
Will Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains Create a Fairer Economy?
Does Harvard Support Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity?
มุมมอง 9922 หลายเดือนก่อน
Does Harvard Support Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity?
Are Electric Vehicles Good For the Planet?
มุมมอง 2.9K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Are Electric Vehicles Good For the Planet?
Do open borders benefit humanity by reducing poverty and boosting the economy?
มุมมอง 9303 หลายเดือนก่อน
Do open borders benefit humanity by reducing poverty and boosting the economy?
Exclusive interview with John Bolton!
มุมมอง 1613 หลายเดือนก่อน
Exclusive interview with John Bolton!
Exclusive interview with Vivek Ramaswamy!
มุมมอง 2413 หลายเดือนก่อน
Exclusive interview with Vivek Ramaswamy!
Should the US Use its Diplomatic and Military Power Around the Globe to Ensure America’s Security?
มุมมอง 3.2K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
Should the US Use its Diplomatic and Military Power Around the Globe to Ensure America’s Security?
Dr. Patrick Moore - Carbon and Climate Catastrophe
มุมมอง 169K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
Dr. Patrick Moore - Carbon and Climate Catastrophe
Steven E. Koonin, Ph.D.-- What Climate Science Tells Us, What it Doesn't and Why it Matters.
มุมมอง 6K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
Steven E. Koonin, Ph.D. What Climate Science Tells Us, What it Doesn't and Why it Matters.
Bjorn Lomborg-- The Cost of Climate Alarmism
มุมมอง 3.8K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
Bjorn Lomborg The Cost of Climate Alarmism
Kali just wants to indite trunk again immediately
I call this Disaster by Design
Can you please remember the people in North Carolina too?
Democrat policies with democrat results.......yet the city is surprised....really🤔
California would not let fire trucks in to help with fires because of emissions 🎉
You can become blind to wise decisions if you look over and say I want that person's hard worked monies. This is called covetness and greed.
Yup, another Con job.
the communist hellhole that they said wouldn't happen because real communism was never tried, had become literally everything everybody has known about communism since the 1800s
Smart young man.
This is how we know the climate crisis isn't real. They aren't pushing real solutions.
It’s all the people getting money created from fake promises of green energy that are at fault.
And it ALL cost more thanks to the Biden administration but not for long. . .
Thats the plan put idiot's in charge. And watch it fail. They know it. i know it. You all know it. Why else would they do it unless thier was a hidden agenda.
WE WON'T HAVE TO LISTEN TO HER WORD SALADS. COMMIE HARRIS TO RUN IN 2028....😅😂
Yep,yep,yep. Asinine!
I’m a firm believer that the far left like human suffering .!!! There’s no other explanation.
Idiots
Correction in our own country plus horrible leadership
Maui all over again
Done on purpose. They say you get what you deserve when you do nothing to fix it . Gavin’s been walking around freely smiling talking to his comrade in Hawaii . They used to hang men in office for treason . Weak men in America ..old saying strong men create easy times easy times create weak men hard times create strong men and there goes the cycle .
Wholly crap.
It's called a setup
But the important thing is they have successfully virtue signal by having an 800 lb battery that's a toxic waste nightmare and fueled by the most polluting nations in the world The actual effect is unimportant, as long as you are appropriately virtuous signaling.
2028 get real
The Olympics are coming! That's what happens when you dry up a lake half the size of the state to build cities, ignore advice and funds to clean up the forests, dump resivors into the ocean destroy 4 water suply dams, don't build the 5 dams voted on & funded in 2014, fire firemen for not taking the COVID jab, hire women that can't do the job bc of WOKEism, & cut funding by $17.5 million! Over 5yrs ago Trump offered to bring down a huge river from Canada if they cleaned up their forests, but nooooo! Governor :"I've had a large team already working on it and we have a plan, we know exactly what we want! It will be great!" The Olympics are coming! Hmmmmmm
Lawsuits are going to bankrupt L.A.!!! Complete negligence!!!
Without carbon dioxide, we could have no plants the first mass extinction was of plants because they produced so much oxygen they couldn’t exist anymore. Then when the mammals came and the animals came and a fish came to place could regrow because they took the oxygen and made it to the carbon dioxide, it’s a cycle of life what is wrong with you people be safe
Totally pointless comment. Stating the obvious does not make AGW wrong.
@ in 1957 I watch the program by a scientist on TV who said if we didn’t start using fossil fuels, we were Going to have a Ice Age In 10 years. They showed the exhaust of the cars And the protrude smoke coming out of the diesel trucks. I like Clean air and water. The tilt of the Earth, the wobble of the Earth. Any orbit of the Earth, have more to do with climate change than anything else. I’m not saying you’re wrong I’m saying look at the whole picture I appreciate every breath I take. And every plant that I eat. The more carbon dioxide is heat the more plants. That’s why the greenhouse was invented. So we could grow plants that we wanted or needed. Be safe.
The Milankovitch cycles have zero impact over 1 century. The orbital parameters you are talking about have cycles of 20k, 40k and 100k years. "in 1957 I watch the program by a scientist .. " Sure but this is irrelevant.
@@kennethcole1551 Starting about 6500 years ago, the Milankovitch Cycles began to cool the earth by about 0.08C per thousand years (Kauffman et al, 2021) and it continued right up until the Industrial Revolution, when the trend reversed. Without our emissions, an 0.08C cooling per thousand years is what we would have faced, meaning that the next reglaciation wouldn't have happened for tens of thousands of years. Scientists in 1957 were still missing a lot if information about the Milankovitch Cycles. Sounds like your guy went way out on a limb and extrapolated to a degree completely unwarranted by the evidence. Try to understand that crackpots and outiers like this do not represent mainstream science.
Is that Robert's son?
See FACT-CHECKING PATRICK MOORE, CLIMATE SCEPTIC. Not a single scientific institution anywhere on earth agrees with him that more CO2 would be good for us. NONE. NADA. ZILCH. Moore isnt a climate scientist, he's a greenwashing PR shill for polluting companies. That includes the oil industry when he headed the CO2 Coalition, which has long been funded by fossil fuel industry investors to promote the use of more gas and oil. Don't be fooled.
He must be related to me ,
He's SOOOO HANDSOME WOW
Heath Ledger makes a great point... although I was shocked to see he was still alive. But what he says is on point and just shows you it is not about climate change, it about globalism and power.
Hypocrisy at its most glorious
Science, the purpose of which is not to understand the world but to legitimize various collectivist ideologies and their perverse goals.The current “scientific consensus” on man-made CO2-driven climate change is just another offshoot of state-funded “nationalized” Science, the purpose of which is not to understand the world but to legitimize various collectivist ideologies and their perverse goals.
Nice
Next time she says "I'm speaking", let her. Her incompetence speaks for itself.
It is NOT about climate control!!!
When will more people wake up! It is a magicians trick. Look over here, not at what my hands are doing.😂
Emissions in any form are very harmful to us humans. If you read, and if you understand chemistry, basic physics and basic human biology. I suggest you read the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration report on emissions. They put a report out every year. Every year they state no car emissions are safe in any amount. “ Rational people, when they learn new information they change. Ignorant people don’t change when they learn new information. “ The people who are in control of the power system and petroleum in America are either ignorant or surrounded by idiots. If we want to truly be the “ Apex Predators “, “ The best “ then we need to do better. We need to create better solutions. No we will not die soon if we don’t. It’s just better to do better. Getting rid of nuclear power because it may go bad is as dumb as keeping gas powered cars. Do we still drive horses and buggy? You know why? Do the math if we all had one and disposed of the waste like we do car fluids now. Yeah poop everywhere. Most people would be just as lazy as they are today. If not, then why do less than 5% of drivers world wide change their own fluids or tires? Why do over 76% of the world’s petroleum producing companies waste gets in our drinking water? Go look this stuff up online. Only an idiot believes the TV and not research for themselves. Most people are lazy and would pay for it even if they could do it. Same with the climate change. A bunch of idiots got together and said “ let’s save the earth from pollution. “ Some other idiots said let’s exploit them. Both groups have the loudest voices and influence. Both groups are in control of the finance system. Both groups control the peoples hero’s. So when scientists and engineers proposed solutions that would solve the problem. The idiots on both sides refused to utilize the solutions. They rather look and sound as if they are doing good, than to actually do good. See the difference. Don’t believe go online and see. Look up the intersection between non biodegradable plastic and African companies who make bricks from them to build forever homes. With steam. Why our governments not do this cheap easy recycling solution? How about the young guy who turn plastic to fuel that’s less harmful to create and higher in energy conversion. All technologies and innovations built from science 60 to 100 years old. The engineering and scientific community have know for almost 200 years how to improve our environment. Over 200 years of solar energy understanding. I can go on and on. Another, use nuclear power to create energy, then store it in batteries. Add Solar to it as well. Tony Seba, former EPA director and more did the math on this. Matter of fact Australia has over decades of data how to store more energy than your population can use. Hell the sun puts out Solar and UV rays. 150 plus Kilowatts a hour everywhere on earth the sun is shining . You can power everything for ever with that. But you will never know nor ever be told the truth. Nor will you go find it. At least most people are lazy and have egos invested in their false beliefs. Facts are facts. Fact our government is run by people who have vested interest in current energy production. Fact non of them want that to change. Fact most Americans want to drive gas cars, until electric cars run on solar. When the energy is cheaper and easier to get. You can say bye to gas.
Um have you never heard of batteries
She's right
Nuclear energy far surpasses wind, hydro and solar energy in every regard and perfectly compliments coal and gas.
However, nuclear has some problems, namely: 1) the cost is more than any other type of power and is typically borne by the taxpayer; 2) there is the risk of an accident such as Chernobyl and Fukushima; although it's a minimal risk, the impact can be huge if it occurs; 3) there is the problem of radioactive waste -- namely where to put it, and will future generations be negatively impacted by it. 4) the byproduct of nuclear power can be used -- and is used in some places - to make nuclear weapons by countries that should not have them. 5) uranium mining is very damaging environmentally
@thinkforyourself2109 The taxpayers have always paid the price of energy because only taxpayers actually make money. We fund all governments. Risk to safety is minimal and as humans learn becomes even less of a problem. Also as humans learn, waste is managed much more safely and could even become a useful byproduct. Nuclear arms have shown to NOT be the everlasting nuclear Armageddon still spoken of by the less informed. Just look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki today. Both beautiful, bustling cities. Mining for elements for the batteries used for solar is one of the worst slow motion disasters in history and it's happening right now plus used batteries are extremely dangerous and no feasible solution has been found to handle them. Wind turbines actually use more resources to produce less energy and their short approximate 10 year life leaves a huge amount of toxic rubble to deal with. And last but not least, the power grid is not maintained and will probably be wiped out completely by a solar flare, the solar wind or a CME in the next 20 years. Then we'll all be reduced to cavemen without a hint of what to do. Billions will die and humanity will start over.
@@justnana2256 Nuclear energy when it came out was promoted as free energy, but it's turned out to be the most expensive form of energy, by far. It is a said to be a "low risk, high impact" type of risk -- meaning that while the incidence of failures is not many, when they do fail it's catastrophic for entire regions. There are many great claims for the new efficient reactors but only a few are in use. They're still experimental. The idea that all the problems will be solved is a good example of what's called "technological optimism" -- which has brought us a great many problems from new technologies that held huge promise but the negative side-effects were unknown, leading to cost-benefit analyses that can put the public at risk for the sake. I am not against nuclear energy but think the grand claims made for it should be toned down a bit, because there are a lot of problems with it that remain unsolved. I also forgot to mention in the last comment that nuclear power plants have the potential to be targets for terrorist attacks.
@@thinkforyourself2109 1) actually nuclear can be the cheapest of any. Ridiculous government involvement increases cost, but it is cheapest before the government screws it up. 2) in the US with the regulations in place there is zero chance of those things happening. 3) This is not an issue. It is such a small amount all the waste from every plant in the US since its inception can easily be stored in one small location. 4) The byproduct CANNOT be used for weapons unless you are talking a dirty bomb from spent fuel. And that would do little to no damage or loss of life. Fertilizer is way more effective and common for example. So that is really a BS reason. Also, the spent fuel is majorly protected. It is easier to rob a hundred banks than get access to one spent rod. 5) All mining is damaging. But uraminum mining is more environmentally friendly than mining for solar panel items needed. It is also more environmentally friendly than the huge waste from the windmills.
@@thinkforyourself2109the ones with the names like think for yourself always be the ones echoing the mainstream media/activists. 😂😂 😂
DEI CRT Cancel Cultures are ALL divided mind-controlled craps! They only confuse those mindless or iliterate !!!😮😢
DEI CRT Cancel Cultures are ALL divided mind-controlled craps! They only confuse those mindless or iliterate !!!😮😢
DEI CRT Cancel Cultures are ALL divided mind-controlled craps! They only confuse those mindless or iliterate !!!😮😢
Lord, kid. You need to get your facts straight before you speak into a mic. Lord!
My brothers and I were hosing down roofs in the path of the 82' fire storm in Anaheim ! And in all these years and all the fires since then this is how prepared they were! This is not a democrat or republican problem, this is corruption at work on both sides! 750k to someone checking fire hydrants , ,no water in the reservoirs ? I left California 30 years ago and can see nothing has changed for the better! Sorry for all the people who lost their life and lost everything! And for the animals That got hurt also!
First of all US Pentagon is guilty of having so heavy dangerous nuclear waste because they let industry only sell the power plants that have weapon capable waste at the end the radiation will go on for a million yrs instead of a view thousand yrs.
Thats democrats for ya California you ppl voted for this hope you vote different this go around yt delete my comments cuz i speek the truth
Hypocrites