World War 3 (Hour by Hour)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 10K

  • @TheInfographicsShow
    @TheInfographicsShow  2 ปีที่แล้ว +579

    Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days! Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile 💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/TheInfographicsShowWW3

  • @gaminglife9205
    @gaminglife9205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10808

    I love how he ends by talking about nuclear warfare and nukes ending the world, and then starts thanking the sponsor

    • @marshall2q648
      @marshall2q648 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      im thanking that he is thanking the sponsor at the end of the video

    • @aphoriste5067
      @aphoriste5067 2 ปีที่แล้ว +435

      "End with the world in ashes"-- THANKS AGAIN TO OUR SPONSORS

    • @ptlewis2000
      @ptlewis2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      That was startling and sobering. "The world will end and we all die. So hey guys don't forget to to use your promo code, and choose YOUR country to simulate the end of civilization! See ya next time as we explore the history of Sierra Leone!"

    • @Kaniela-xq8vl
      @Kaniela-xq8vl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      “note’s”??? What does the apostrophe do?

    • @gaminglife9205
      @gaminglife9205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Kaniela-xq8vl wrong comment

  • @OneCut1Slash
    @OneCut1Slash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3011

    "... That will end with the world in ashes..."
    Roughly 140 years later the Vault Dweller emerges.

    • @9_1.1
      @9_1.1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +102

      This comment alone made me redownload fallout shelter

    • @LEX_O0880
      @LEX_O0880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@9_1.1 nice

    • @charliechurch5004
      @charliechurch5004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol

    • @Xtank425
      @Xtank425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Vault dwellers, you mean, if you're thinking about more than one fallout game

    • @someoneout-there2165
      @someoneout-there2165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Fallout 2 was absolutely one of the best games I've ever played. You can literally almost do anything you want.

  • @virginiatrains7886
    @virginiatrains7886 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2477

    Anyone else feel like everytime this guy uploads something involving either Russia, Ukraine or WWIII if it happened, it ends up happening?

    • @Slenderlink99
      @Slenderlink99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      yeah i was just thinking ab that

    • @Normal_is_boring25
      @Normal_is_boring25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Now that you mention it yes.

    • @Normal_is_boring25
      @Normal_is_boring25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @Deceased Canadian Goose really? Wow that’s impressive

    • @galaxyminer694
      @galaxyminer694 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @Deceased Canadian Goose what does this comment mean for this

    • @NortheastSurvival911
      @NortheastSurvival911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      As I was sitting here watching that I was thinking pretty much what you just said and then I glanced down and there it was. But yes you are correct. So if he could like maybe make a video about World war 3 not happening and me hitting the lottery you know that'd be great.

  • @tinynekoking6488
    @tinynekoking6488 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    I whole heartedly think they should make an updated version of this video every year. So much changed it would be so interesting to hear any differences or similarities between the years.

    • @JoshMessiCR7
      @JoshMessiCR7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The American government is under control of nuclear warmongering imperialists lee by biden prestige but russia is under an dictator who abuses his position and commits war crimes.

    • @Spectator12
      @Spectator12 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ok no one gonna talk about indie

    • @Military-Games
      @Military-Games 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL😂

  • @luluonly486
    @luluonly486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2758

    This video: Russia takes Europe in a day.
    Russia: can’t take Ukraine in 6 months…
    *this video aged well* 😂

    • @michaelafrank56
      @michaelafrank56 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Lol facts

    • @danielramirez1529
      @danielramirez1529 2 ปีที่แล้ว +159

      Yeah literally I think this creator and similar will need to reevaluate their estimations on the military capabilities and strength of Russia’s forces.

    • @ozPanzer
      @ozPanzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

      @@danielramirez1529 should release a new one where Moscow falls within a week.

    • @thegoingmeiry
      @thegoingmeiry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Actually Russia could take Ukraine easily if they want to. They are only sending their old weapons to Ukraine so that they can use their better weapons against Nato incase they started to attack Russia. And remember they also have hypersonic missile technology that NATO doesn't have so they only need very few hypersonic missiles to attack useful parts of Ukraine and end everything. Remember one hypersonic missile can destroy the capital of Ukraine in less than 30 minute.
      Now I'm not picking sides I'm just saying what could happen so don't come at me with your snowflake attitude.

    • @ozPanzer
      @ozPanzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thegoingmeiry hahahahaha no. They have so few hypersonic missiles it wouldn't make a difference otherwise they would have used them. Russia has been proven to be a paper tiger and the world is now laughing at Russia.
      They have sent T-90 and latest helicopters and strike aircraft and all have been found out. They won't send SU-57 and T-14 because they have so few and will be found to be like everything else Russia has sent to the meat grinder. Not good enough.

  • @writingref
    @writingref 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1773

    The likelihood of China attacking Taiwan at the same time an already devastated Russia decides to go after the rest of NATO is increasingly unlikely- but I will consider this a “what if Ukraine had fallen quickly”

    • @jakeg3126
      @jakeg3126 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      I also don't think it's remotely any of the other stuff could take place or already happen in a few hours not everyone is 100% ready all the time and is attacking with planes in the air, marching through countries and have have time for it to be considering hesitating to attack only a few hours after something happens

    • @berlyngrey9242
      @berlyngrey9242 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@jakeg3126 I couldn't follow any of what you were saying

    • @jakeg3126
      @jakeg3126 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@berlyngrey9242 I should've added comma or something. He mentioned them both attacking and counterattacking at same time. I wordy by saying by hour 1, somehow the attacked countries impossibly got mobilized and was ready to defend itself. I don't think a lot of people would even know something happened for a few hours.
      Everyone was too ready

    • @azersrecordings.3600
      @azersrecordings.3600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @Good nest he’s basically saying some of these events would probably happen farther over time.

    • @JasonCummer
      @JasonCummer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe they are waiting for Russia to fall further so they can annex some of the disputed land on their boarder

  • @iunnor
    @iunnor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1612

    Infographics: “US aircraft carriers are almost impossible to sink!”
    Also infographic: “Yeah the Chinese will sink about 4 or 5 of them”

    • @SalvorCraft
      @SalvorCraft 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      frrr

    • @robertcowan7610
      @robertcowan7610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +163

      The United States' aircraft carriers would not be sunk. Period.

    • @backupdoughboi6822
      @backupdoughboi6822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

      I mean constant bombardment would reshape the earth, highly doubt a ship would be just fine

    • @SalvorCraft
      @SalvorCraft 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@backupdoughboi6822 you have a point but it wouldnt sink

    • @backupdoughboi6822
      @backupdoughboi6822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@SalvorCraft only a matter of time until we see who is right

  • @Adam23165
    @Adam23165 ปีที่แล้ว +1165

    ...he really needs to re-do this one. In the last 7 months since this video was released, the world learned that Russia would be a big no show for WW3.

    • @noonefromnowhere9940
      @noonefromnowhere9940 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      What?

    • @Blackeyemofo
      @Blackeyemofo ปีที่แล้ว +105

      True, their cardboard helmets and inability to refuel their vehicles efficiently has shown to be disastrous. Drone warfare and the javelin supplied by the United States also has been crippling them hard. I don’t think Russia is really trying all that hard although even on a small scale people were expecting Ukraine to be squashed. We since then have been able to reverse engineer some of their tech.

    • @imreloadin
      @imreloadin ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Blackeyemofo Bro you really think they're not trying hard??? I'm sorry but you don't get to say they haven't been trying hard when they've had to vastly widen their conscription efforts and have been having to resort to using bullets from 40 years ago. They are trying REALLY hard but they are just vastly ineffective in both war materials and personnel. They've shown the entire world that their military is mostly bluff at this point due to extensive corruption and ineptitude.

    • @Blackeyemofo
      @Blackeyemofo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imreloadin they havnt even used a 1/5th of their known active personnel. A little under 1/15th of their active plus reserve… if Russia were to be trying they would be sending hoards of dudes with no weapon to charge a machine gun nest like they did in ww2

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its simple. Russia don´t attack, and it don´t happen. The only possible war now is a nuclear war.

  • @TheHockeyKeeper
    @TheHockeyKeeper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +725

    The extent of changes in the world, and new realizations since the release of this video, is staggering.

    • @danielsmithiv1279
      @danielsmithiv1279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      There was no point in all this demonstration of new technology when nukes were going to end up getting used.
      It's all pointless. Might as well kick off the football game with an actual football.

    • @xhippy4682
      @xhippy4682 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Yeah like Finland ans Sweden now members of NATO.

    • @ctg4818
      @ctg4818 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Plain to see real life is just Hearts of Iron 5

    • @jmupp2876
      @jmupp2876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@xhippy4682 yes and also the ineffectiveness of Russia

    • @jamama3218
      @jamama3218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@danielsmithiv1279 You are extremely naive if you believe that kid..

  • @jaredcolon4535
    @jaredcolon4535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1233

    This was an absolute and totally captivating story line. And I honestly think it would be a worth while series to produce monthly. To play this actually out and use declassified info and get input from military strategist act and retired. I will say though that was a very optimistic outcome china taking out that many carriers so quickly. Maybe maybe that many over two months or three but not in the open especially not against the next generation carriers

    • @parkourcentral7194
      @parkourcentral7194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes yes yes

    • @zsarimaxim692
      @zsarimaxim692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Would be more entertaining if the guy has better knowledge of how military equipment actually works.

    • @raylopez99
      @raylopez99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Nope, this Infographics Show video is bogus. I did not watch the video, but it's probably inaccurate if it deals with nuclear war. Extensive war gaming has found that in a ICBM nuclear exchange (i.e., not a tactical nuke situation) the most likely areas to be hit are NOT the USA or Russia or China, but rather...the Pacific Ocean or some other uninhabited area. This is because for the first round, "saber rattling" is common rather than actual strikes. The USA actually though about doing the same thing in WWII, but because it only had two bombs, it did not risk a "demonstration" strike. However, today, with thousands of nuclear missiles on each side, it's feasible to do such demonstration strikes. Upvote me if you found this informative and if the Infographic Show failed to mention this (I'm not going to watch this long episode).

    • @manoloorz
      @manoloorz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@zsarimaxim692 he doesn't write the episodes, he's just the narrator, infographics is a big team of people, not just him

    • @damien991
      @damien991 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@raylopez99 They briefly mention it in the last 30 seconds, with no real detail. At least watch the a video before you criticise it. I don't care if you don't want to watch a long video (Listen to it in the background if you must). They went to the effort of making it so at least go to the effort of watching their video. It take can easily take 100+ man hours to make a video this long all it cost you is 30 minutes.
      Worst of all you didn't even bother jumping to the end of video to see if they mention nuclear wars it would have taken what 1-2 minutes max. You probably spent at least 10 writing that ill informed comment.

  • @henrytang2203
    @henrytang2203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +837

    This hypothetical situation could only arise at the peak of the USSR's power. The majority of Russian youth today want to emigrate and the vast majority of Russian conscripts don't want to be there. I doubt Russia could effectively take on NATO without nukes. As for China and Taiwan, I think it'll more likely persist as a North/South Korea arrangement; lots of threats but war is too costly.

    • @bradleyisclutch
      @bradleyisclutch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      that’s the problem. They wouldn’t have a chance without nuclear weapons. Which is why a war with NATO Vs Russia would result in nuclear disaster :(

    • @xxxcool2565
      @xxxcool2565 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would Russia have any qualms to use Nukes? What do they have to lose? West pushed them against the wall.

    • @isaowater
      @isaowater 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@bradleyisclutch Exactly, it's horrifying what will happen to europe and the world when such a thing happens.

    • @JordanBlue1
      @JordanBlue1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You sounds hopeful, and scared.

    • @ericherrmann3799
      @ericherrmann3799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I think your right USSR today could never beat NATO, like you said though they have the nukes, and if there losing the war really what do you think they're going to do 13000 nukes worldwide and no one going to use them in WW3 I bet the nukes will start flying in less than a week. Guess will see ?

  • @christopherreynolds5783
    @christopherreynolds5783 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    Such a sad story. We all just want to take care of our kids.

    • @childskites6346
      @childskites6346 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Same but its not fair when leadership makes the rules

    • @sirleme6522
      @sirleme6522 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      YEAH TAKE CARE OF OUR KIDS WHILE WE ARE BEING UNJUST TO OTHER PEOPLE AND MAKING OTHER PEOPLE SUFFER BECAUSE OF US INCLUDING OUR KIDS

    • @holdenparker179
      @holdenparker179 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@childskites6346 who then would make the rules? losers?

    • @mrdatnigg
      @mrdatnigg ปีที่แล้ว

      @Holden Parker So if you aren't a leader you're automatically a loser? Care to explain why?

    • @holdenparker179
      @holdenparker179 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrdatnigg Any person in a society loses to a leader of its society. The Leader is one and only. Means he or she or it is above the society and any other from this society. Which means that they lose to the leader. Which means they are losers. Of course, they can try to make up the majority, change the game, even change the society. Bit then again, the system is built up and creates a new leader with more power. Again, the leader rules and everyone is a loser against him/her/it.

  • @Andy-WanKenobi
    @Andy-WanKenobi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +914

    I have several problems with this the biggest being we knew the build up of Russian forces far before the war started and the way this is shown is basically a surprise attack which I find extremely doubtful considering we would be able to see the buildup of Chinese boats before they get the chance to set sail

    • @williamwchuang
      @williamwchuang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      We would mine the seas between China and Taiwan.

    • @FrankBUILTperformance
      @FrankBUILTperformance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Exactly. These kinds of invasions don’t take weeks to prep. You would see the major uptick in activity / build up.

    • @thehorsecockexpress1068
      @thehorsecockexpress1068 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah the US have known all of Russia's movements and numbers months before the Ukraine conflict. NATO and the US would clap China

    • @nickt600
      @nickt600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@williamwchuang Taiwan isn't part of NATO so i doubt they would get any help defending against China

    • @DexWeapons
      @DexWeapons 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      @@nickt600 Taiwan japan and South Korea are in an alliance called SEATO which is a pacific defense alliance with the USA in it as well

  • @marshaltito7232
    @marshaltito7232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1426

    Probably not the most realistic, but this was a fun all out scenario that really took me through it!

    • @Kopie0830
      @Kopie0830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Yep, possible nuclear warfare is fun...

    • @Ghost0fPakistan
      @Ghost0fPakistan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      Probably? Almost all of it is a frikin joke. He's just doing this for bias entertainment.

    • @JP-hj2gs
      @JP-hj2gs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Ghost0fPakistan Then please tell us what you would forecast for WWIII

    • @ThorSuzuki1
      @ThorSuzuki1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@Ghost0fPakistan Think he is clearly quite unbiased. It's no secret Russia stands NO chance against Nato, Putin himself said it. China is a difficult one as China has never fought a modern war. And not at this scale with their unproven tech.

    • @emanueldelacruz1101
      @emanueldelacruz1101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@ThorSuzuki1
      China Russia alliance would destroy NATO. Both China and Russia have allies that this guy conviniently Left out. North Corea alone. Whole make a whole to the NATO. No to mention Iran

  • @dorkking100
    @dorkking100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +583

    It's crazy to me to think people actually believe russia could take the entire baltics in a day. If every city just surrendered, it'd still take a week. Same with taiwan. First day they might not even invade taiwan themselves. Unless the island just surrendered, it could take years to fully conquer.

    • @foolroblox3231
      @foolroblox3231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yet again, the Taliban took over in like 1 month after that offensive

    • @Dodsodalo
      @Dodsodalo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

      @@foolroblox3231 America left the defense of Afghanistan to the official Army and government.
      Who just.... Left.
      I think there is a difference there.

    • @kennethJAO96
      @kennethJAO96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it will vary on the day they'll deploy their militaries power. take note that china is one of the great powers with lots of military equipment and personnel's. I just hope that if this happen that great countries have a way to neutralize them without using nukes.

    • @robertives973
      @robertives973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think if it came down to it, the west would be foolish to underestimate China. Russia obviously isn’t what it used to be but China has tons of tech and tons of money. Of course, it would be hard for the US to conquer the baltics within a day too so I think you’re pretty right there.

    • @danielc9967
      @danielc9967 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, China and Russia are just paper tigers, their armies would all cave unless they resort to Nukes, hasn’t the Ukraine conflict thought everyone that? If Russia hasn’t been able to conquer Ukraine, there’s no way they’ll last even a month against Nato.

  • @kylethecatholic
    @kylethecatholic ปีที่แล้ว +63

    The one thing I think that’s wrong with this scenario, Belarus is not included as a belligerent, or at the very least, is not included as a Russian jumping off point for their invasion of Poland.

    • @maxpowsey3763
      @maxpowsey3763 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@afterawordfromoursponsor @1:53

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The poles aren't idiots they've been thinking about this scenario for decades.
      They're the least likely to be caught by surprise by any hypothetical situation in this video

  • @nathanbrammer8471
    @nathanbrammer8471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +558

    I think you are being very generous to the Russians especially and also the Chinese. Also this would probably go nuclear a lot quicker.

    • @kamilwolny
      @kamilwolny 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      There is no reason to youse nuclear weapon, Z Chinese want Taiwan in one peace

    • @ianburns1175
      @ianburns1175 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think it would go nuclear quickly....mutual destruction is suicide....as long as they have hope no one will use nukes....now once a side loses hope that's when nukes will be used. Before you beat them they will want to inflict as much pain as possible

    • @justplanes295
      @justplanes295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@kamilwolny Russia doesn’t seem to be so thorough though

    • @agarrikr2996
      @agarrikr2996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justplanes295 none of them can, no country will want war, this isn’t Lego or UFC. even if a country will beat another, it’ll sustain heavy damages.
      Let’s say Russia and US decide to go nuclear, and Us wins, cool it wins.
      But now it wouldn’t be a world wide power, and it will be like Pakistan or some third world country. Win but at what cost ? Leaders are smart, not children. It’s only us talking about wars

    • @qweqwe-qe9ty
      @qweqwe-qe9ty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Not really, given that 7 months into Ukraine invasion nukes are still not used. He said nukes within a week, which is extremely early

  • @tryep5567
    @tryep5567 2 ปีที่แล้ว +417

    I'm okay with most of this as it's all just speculation. However, expecting the people of Russia or China to rise up and do more than small protests against their governments over military aggression means you vastly overestimate the willingness of people to risk their lives

    • @gunslinger9171
      @gunslinger9171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Yeah Hong Kong would totally revolt and a civil war would occur so China would have to deal with that too.

    • @johnpaul3099
      @johnpaul3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Furthermore war with NATO would focus support from the people nobody wants to see their country destroyed regardless of the regime

    • @bhatkat
      @bhatkat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yeah, any dissenters will know enough to keep low, they will know the consequences of challenging the popular lies. Even in an open society like the USA they had very little effect during the oil wars. And the "right to life" people will be screaming for blood of course.

    • @amhuman5138
      @amhuman5138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gunslinger9171 I would personally revive the 'mandate of the emperor' concept and make the position democratic, then rule China by sheer power of not understanding their politics!

    • @jasonlib1996
      @jasonlib1996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      You underestimate the level of resistance of general populations once they're seeing large volumes of their country men killed.
      The Ukraine war has show massive public outcries and protests against the Russian government. as well as troops who were misinformed of their tasks, and object significantly to the point of critically low morale and desertion. This has been the reality in Ukraine, whilst they are against an almost infinitely motivated opponent fighting strongly for their freedoms from occupation, including civilians who have been fighting, or erecting obstacles and traps.

  • @dcap1
    @dcap1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    End of the video: "...in an escalatory ladder that will end with the world in ashes. Thanks again to our sponsor, conflict of nations."

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Conflicts of nations is usually the backbone of their videos.

    • @beenaplumber8379
      @beenaplumber8379 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, it's nice they got around to acknowledging nukes in a video about WWIII. I mean, it's cool to see all this stuff about how it could play out today. All the best nuclear holocaust movies include a scenario for the start of the war, and it's nice to see that updated. But really, nukes are kinda the assumption for WWIII, and I was really looking for a description of how that might play out. Instead we get a fascinating premise for a video game.

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@beenaplumber8379 I don’t think either side would actually launch the apocalyptic exchange that movies describe. I’d bet limited exchange with deaths in the millions, maybe tens of millions (including from radiation, climate disruption, food shortages, etc.). I think that would be enough to get both sides to back away from the table.

    • @luckyus4377
      @luckyus4377 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      have a look at Patrick Lancaster or Graham Phillips channels, they report from the front lines, so we can see some truth.

    • @warrenreid6109
      @warrenreid6109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea, I got that too.

  • @spacetragedy
    @spacetragedy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Hour 1 war starts, hour 2 France surrenders...again...😂😂😂

    • @ChuckMccanless-hk4rw
      @ChuckMccanless-hk4rw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Canada surrendering quickly after France

    • @zachtaylor8222
      @zachtaylor8222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      France is a top 5 military power with the strongest historical military tradition who has the second highest amount of experience in fighting wars over the last 40 years.
      Yall need to read a GD history book that isn't about the one bad war they had.

    • @kevinvangils5065
      @kevinvangils5065 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zachtaylor8222 You’re the one needing to read a history book. France has the 11th best military as of 2024

  • @felixnyamongo
    @felixnyamongo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    We need a remake of this video. In light of recent events.

    • @Bearstat
      @Bearstat ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russia is winning here lol

    • @gentleminion2849
      @gentleminion2849 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Bearstat in a realistic scenario russia will fall within 5 months

    • @user_mcl_28
      @user_mcl_28 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No matter what happens, this man takes the side of the West and pushes the video towards the victory of the West because he is an American himself

  • @Meloncholymadness
    @Meloncholymadness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    6:00 Imagine being a tank driver and assigned to one of Russia's cold era tanks... It'd be like knowing you're literally canon fodder..

    • @Theorginalherobrine772
      @Theorginalherobrine772 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Command wouldn't tell them they are...just like the conscripts and the equipment they sent to Ukraine in the first weeks was literally canon fodder but Russian government told the the conscripts it was just "a special operation and that Ukraine would welcome them"

    • @Meloncholymadness
      @Meloncholymadness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@Theorginalherobrine772 That's a Western propaganda narrative.

    • @adrinathegreat3095
      @adrinathegreat3095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      True, you could also say the same thing with nato infantry, Low iq cannon fodder.
      The ones waging the war wouldn't be the ones fighting

    • @meloney
      @meloney 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Meloncholymadness The fact that they were canon fodder is not though. Thats just reality with conscripts going into a war the first days.

    • @chriszachary8104
      @chriszachary8104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I wouldnt wanna be a driver of russian anything in ukraine right now st.javalin is watching
      🤣🇺🇦🇺🇦

  • @matthewjacob5174
    @matthewjacob5174 2 ปีที่แล้ว +655

    I'm both fascinated and scared bc this is interesting but scared bc it might become a reality

    • @Dylan-uz4nq
      @Dylan-uz4nq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      If you live in America you don’t need to be scared we good lol

    • @fuzzbuzz2968
      @fuzzbuzz2968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Dylan-uz4nq Canada gang 🥱

    • @lordtark6736
      @lordtark6736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      If this channel is talking about it. You bet it's going to freaking happen 😭

    • @Tanker000
      @Tanker000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Blame on Joe Biden for not doing his job right

    • @11th_defender51
      @11th_defender51 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@fuzzbuzz2968 bro we are part of NATO. Which means Canada has to help.

  • @myservicesride6086
    @myservicesride6086 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    After this video was released, the Philippines agreed and allowed 4 new "bases US can use". This is a game changer, to the detriment of China.

    • @ReeseW313
      @ReeseW313 ปีที่แล้ว

      That part ‼️ 🤓

  • @leonard6536
    @leonard6536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    When I’m nervous about this stuff I come to this channel to lighten the mood but then it is all back again before the sponsors are thanked.

  • @Justin-bv3gi
    @Justin-bv3gi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1381

    Feel like he’s giving away everyone’s secret defense tactics with this.

    • @matthewnewton8812
      @matthewnewton8812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +162

      If they were secrets, he wouldn’t have known them….duh…

    • @philipwade2103
      @philipwade2103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      There’s no way he’s giving up Classified material. He’s giving up general information that is already known by all sides. There’s so much we don’t know that’s kept Top Secret.

    • @your_-_mom
      @your_-_mom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@philipwade2103 it was a joke…

    • @mohamednorizam5027
      @mohamednorizam5027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Relax dude… Dis is juz another GI Joe cartoon.. 😂

    • @zofferz0
      @zofferz0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Most of the tactics in the video are for training/what they might do by the book. In reality its not gonna go anywhere near the video different tactics for different times adding in the amount of resources they have at the moment

  • @mcain2911
    @mcain2911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    The critique I have is that I highly doubt it would take that long to get the American military into the places it was needed. We knew what Russia intended to do months before they did it. I would imagine there would be an obvious and not so obvious buildup of forces in anticipation of the scenarios shown.

    • @spvillano
      @spvillano 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We have two primary deployment modes. Airborne mode, with somewhat limited assets deployable and while granted, it's an impressive capability, a full army it is not. Then, there's marine transportation mode, which can take weeks to get shiploads of angry men and angrier equipment.

    • @k.lisaswensen9877
      @k.lisaswensen9877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed.

    • @rustyreese4006
      @rustyreese4006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@spvillano it depends on the theater of the conflict. The US has forward deployed equipment in several places that's all maintained and wouldn't take weeks to deploy. Also several nations use equipment the US has sold them so they could use them while waiting. Plus a bunch of other logistics stuff that we probably don't have a clue about. Then there's the weapons that have been developed tested and never needed that people never think about. One of those things is a reason I don't think China would be very effective at the extreme long range missile strikes against the navy. About the only accurate thing in this video is most likely the very end.

    • @bigj9761
      @bigj9761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Russia wouldn't last a week and ill give china two weeks

    • @emanueldelacruz1101
      @emanueldelacruz1101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Russia and China have allies. The East is just too strong

  • @pahtar7189
    @pahtar7189 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    China making a declaration of war would be an admission that Taiwan is an independent nation, so there's no way they'd do this.

  • @desertzillions4171
    @desertzillions4171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    Hind sight being 20/20, it is doubtful Russia could have performed as stated in this. Chance are Russia would get beat quickly due to the extreme challenges in supply chain. From what I understand, China's ability to move troops is very limited and the Navy is still very incapable. It is also very unlikely that he U.S Navy would just walk into China's missile range without attempting to take out capabilities with stealth and other first strike weapons.

    • @ScpDrRisha
      @ScpDrRisha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes...though,I always feared this would happen! I'm even more frightened in the fact Russia could (might not) attack the UK where I'm from as I've got my whole future ahead and it's scary being in a country that is helping Ukraine to attack Russia! Even scarier to be in a country AT war! The more Russia fights the more country's that get involved and it gets more dangerous...there is a matter of time when Britain goes to war....I think this war would go on for quite a couple of years as it did for ww2 might not though as greater technology is being made
      So yeah

    • @_R-R
      @_R-R 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      While the PLAN is not on the same footing as the USN in capability, that gap is steadily closing. Yet in terms of sheer numbers, the PLAN is the global leader.

    • @kevinbarry4325
      @kevinbarry4325 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Finally,a knowledgeable person…we are simply the best. War is our business,we have been at war for 100 yrs somewhere..we are the supreme warlords of this planet.

    • @stephenluo8620
      @stephenluo8620 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Russia has more nukes than USA. Means better not defeat Russia, or everyone dies together. You got it?

    • @xdcamikazie1217
      @xdcamikazie1217 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@ScpDrRisha ukraine isn’t attacking russia mate

  • @kennethn3179
    @kennethn3179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +384

    I think this channel gives Russia a lot more credit than it's actually capable of.

    • @johnpaul3099
      @johnpaul3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      What European country has the ability to take over the Ukraine?

    • @danielc9967
      @danielc9967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@johnpaul3099 Germany, France the UK even Poland could all take Ukraine easily

    • @danielc9967
      @danielc9967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@johnpaul3099 even Russia could have taken Ukraine if they weren’t so disorganized and incompetent

    • @johnpaul3099
      @johnpaul3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@danielc9967 Only France and Turkey have that ability . Germany bwahaha

    • @matthewb5364
      @matthewb5364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Best to overestimate and then "never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake."

  • @iphoneman1231
    @iphoneman1231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    Hey just wanted to let ya know when you showed the pictures for the f22 and f35, those were both the f35! The F-22 isn't a single thruster jet like the F35! Just wanted to clarify for other viewing, no biggie; love your videos!

    • @nicholasniemann1176
      @nicholasniemann1176 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also a bunch of country’s have f35s

    • @bryanpayton1168
      @bryanpayton1168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought someone else had to notice that, lol.

    • @ewyattgd5411
      @ewyattgd5411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the vertical and horizontal stabilizers are also different

    • @iphoneman1231
      @iphoneman1231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ewyattgd5411 there are a LOT of key differences, but I figured thrusters was just the easiest thing I could point out that the average person (who doesent know anything about jets) would understand as a visual difference between the two.

    • @awesomealol0
      @awesomealol0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      nerds

  • @sisuriffs
    @sisuriffs ปีที่แล้ว +10

    After doing so much in WW2, looks like Canada pretty much sits this one out, except as generalized NATO forces (English and French) until that last Doctor Strangelove hour of course.
    Intriguing video. Excellent work!

    • @deanfirnatine7814
      @deanfirnatine7814 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trudeau has let the Canadian military wither away to nothing

  • @hanzo8120
    @hanzo8120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    The ending is hilarous, I mean we would turn this planet into nuclear dust and just doing nuclear holocaust to ourselves in WW3. but thank you for the sponsors of the game world war 3 etc., was just the icing on the cake.👌👍

    • @SeraphusInferis
      @SeraphusInferis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      There's no way that was an accident! LOL

    • @Tijaayy
      @Tijaayy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The game is literally just this video but you control it😂

    • @PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945
      @PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like that ending, no more suffering

    • @jedi4049
      @jedi4049 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PatrickMenesesYTOfficial4945 underrated ending lol

    • @seiji-kun9488
      @seiji-kun9488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      we're just a dust in the universe. i guess a nuclear dust is much cooler.

  • @Powderlover1
    @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    i love how this is basically a battle between Russia and not the US, but the US’s ability to get to the battlefield.

    • @FrankBUILTperformance
      @FrankBUILTperformance 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I doubt the us would be caught so off guard. We’re always looking for a war, we would be much more ready. At least on one front lol

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@FrankBUILTperformance I paid $85 for a 3 minute doctors visit and antibiotic yesterday. That better be for a reason.

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @LibtardsStillCant SilenceMe20 actually I give in, you recognize in the UK, if you have a heart attack you don’t have to wait, right? General wait times for doctor visits are equal to the US, as is emergency response/intake. And for specialist visits it’s determined on an as needed basis, if you have an emergency you get in, same as the US. What does have higher wait times are elective and nonemergency surgeries, think colonoscopy, which have about double our wait times. However you fail to realize a nationalized system would cut OUR direct health expense by about 40%, that’s about a new car for me. That’s how much more efficient a system like the NHS is. As for death panels, no, just fake news, and as for forced abortions, no you do not, unless you know someone in China, but that’s not exactly on their healthcare system. Goodbye bot.

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh that 40% is if you have an average HMO plan, if you’re uninsured it could be 100’s of thousands.

    • @Powderlover1
      @Powderlover1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@JeikuAnimeReview of value, absolutely. $100 an aspirin at the hospital, or 3k for a 5 min ride in a glorified bus, not at all. Our system is built for the rich, and why our infant mortality rate is ranked so much lower than European countries’.

  • @joellyneham1987
    @joellyneham1987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    As an Aussie, I love how you refer to us as a ‘major power’ 😂😂

    • @richardofrijole6309
      @richardofrijole6309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      When the United States is your close allie then you are world power.

    • @braddles5639
      @braddles5639 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      As a fellow Aussie, I actually came looking for this comment as I thought the same thing haha. I did look it up though. The Global Fire power Index has is at no. 17, between Germany and Israel.

    • @Kryojenix
      @Kryojenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      'Straya!

    • @joellyneham1987
      @joellyneham1987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@braddles5639 so we are above Israel, which has nuclear weapons? Wow I have new respect for our defence forces.

    • @jacksonpettit4690
      @jacksonpettit4690 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@joellyneham1987 that's because a treaty between the USA and the UK allows Australia to have nuclear armed fleets

  • @xavie-san-3334
    @xavie-san-3334 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Well... This video aged like milk.

  • @repostifyou9457
    @repostifyou9457 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    Plot twist: This isn't an alternate universe.

    • @boomyoulookingforthis1362
      @boomyoulookingforthis1362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      POV: This isn’t a point of view but the world you actually live in.

    • @ShagWitTheBag
      @ShagWitTheBag 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@boomyoulookingforthis1362 no way this would go down like this

  • @alexmarrs7762
    @alexmarrs7762 2 ปีที่แล้ว +355

    Eh....this relies too heavily on a "perfect scenario." Simply put, Russia would suffer immense logistical and attritional problems and it cannot launch a coordinated attack between it's sea, air & land forces. China has serious equipment issues, no body armor and most of it's troops consist of "spoiled brats." There is an actual term for it, I just can't recall it. Not to mention the lack of drone warfare. Simply put, Russia and China would not be able to pull off anything to that scale. Maybe in the next 50 years or so.

    • @alvarohernandez8287
      @alvarohernandez8287 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      but the outcome would be the same if they declared war, no? talking about the use of nuclear weapons

    • @Minamoto_1
      @Minamoto_1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Little emperors

    • @seanthomxx2694
      @seanthomxx2694 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Thank you. Also, it seems weird that Infographic is giving the Chinese air power so much credibility when they did a video about their failures, including the J-10 and their trying master carrier landings.

    • @zenpai5998
      @zenpai5998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@seanthomxx2694 it just came out that Chinas population will start to decline this year as opposed to next decade so maybe they’re being paid off to give china a handicap.

    • @coleanderson8035
      @coleanderson8035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And what this shows especially at the start shows nato amd specifically the us doing absolutely nothing until china already strikes which is extremely unrealistic

  • @fredriks91
    @fredriks91 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Language is not an issue. Italians Germans and Poles etc have become significantly better at English just over the two-three decades I've been able to observe.
    And remember: some might sound broken in spontaneous conversations with a lot of random topics with words and phrases some might haven't thought of in English before.
    But speaking around industry topics and jargons is a piece of cake.

    • @puranapuu4252
      @puranapuu4252 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude, Italians who lives even in Aust NZ US UK having difficulty speaking English

    • @Neverest.
      @Neverest. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats cool but your observations are irrelevant. Language is an issue and translation is needed. Only about 34% of Italians can speak English for example, and some of those peoples levels are quite low. Less than 40% of Polish speak English and under 10% speak it fluently. In a world war, translation is needed because language is an issue. You're just wrong with this comment.

    • @zarbi64
      @zarbi64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@puranapuu4252 It's not hard to understand basic broke english

    • @fuzzblightyear145
      @fuzzblightyear145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      honestly, I know plenty of Europeans who speak better english than many locals I know 😁😁

    • @J-C.Denton
      @J-C.Denton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fuzzblightyear145 Why wouldn't they be fluent and well versed at English? English is an official language of the European Union and English was literally invented in Europe. lol

  • @AzHwk
    @AzHwk ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Interesting video, you've told us the "how" now tell us the "why". 🤔 what's wrong with the places that they've got that makes leaders feel the need to invade other countries?

    • @getgggged123
      @getgggged123 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I asked my dad about this when I was a teen. his response ill never forget.
      "so long as two men exist that are aware of each others existance, war is inevitable"
      it's in our nature.

    • @N.O.V.V
      @N.O.V.V ปีที่แล้ว +2

      money

    • @saiya2521
      @saiya2521 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@getgggged123
      “Only the dead have seen the end of war.”
      Plato

    • @donaldpaluga
      @donaldpaluga ปีที่แล้ว +1

      War. War never changes

    • @Geckorawasg
      @Geckorawasg ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Resources

  • @slyfox8900
    @slyfox8900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Wow, that ending though, "end with the world in ashes" - "THANKS TO OUR SPONSOR!"

  • @Oweywiwy
    @Oweywiwy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Putin be like: interesting idea can't wait to try it

    • @wcw209suck
      @wcw209suck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You had been watching too much main stream media. Had you watch independence media? There are peoples like Aaron Mate who are not paid by the government like CNN and NBC and are trying to find the truth.

    • @doggydude2668
      @doggydude2668 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ik it's a joke but bro this is *world* war💀

    • @zubzero9593
      @zubzero9593 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@doggydude2668 russia cant even beat Ukraine in 2 months let alone the entire EU 💀

    • @soupbae3542
      @soupbae3542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@zubzero9593 it's because Russia is the aggresor and they use tanks while their counterpart are just hiding and waiting to attack. Russia is being cautious to civilians.

    • @soupbae3542
      @soupbae3542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zubzero9593 ukraine ranks 22 in most powerful military in the world. Russia are not underestimating that.

  • @SageTempest
    @SageTempest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    I really like these type of videos

  • @andrewwallace2576
    @andrewwallace2576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At the time of writing, I am only 19 minutes in. However, I have to say, I enjoy The Infographics Show neutrality when creating videos like this. They do not choose sides necessarily, and they do not beat around the bush on a lot of their videos.
    Watching at 31 minutes I cannot get over the fact that they have not really expressed the idea of Africa and South America in this video. The issue these days is that a world war is simply that... a world war. Not only will we experience tension with those that we "US" deal with daily. We acquire new threats everywhere. Whether these threats can be dealt with and potentially turned with us against our enemy is one thing. But we still have to take into consideration of these two continents. (Whether they're capable of doing any harm to us or not)

  • @marketslice5030
    @marketslice5030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    a little strange infographics shows us real-world scenarios BEFORE they happen, and then these events end up happening

    • @SteezusKhrist
      @SteezusKhrist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      tbh this channel teaches me how to observe what goes on in life and predict the outcomes that could happen

    • @evanoconnell9448
      @evanoconnell9448 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aaaaaand dont actuwlly happen anything like how infographics say it would.
      Which is not surprising given the propagamda style lies like in this video. Hour 2.....crippling sanctions againat russia for taking crimea.....nope. thats a flat out lie!

    • @kmg9359
      @kmg9359 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@codyspencer7047 why ):

    • @Andrew-wh4qm
      @Andrew-wh4qm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tbh I'm hoping it doesn't happen just to see the pessimists getting dunked on

    • @c.eastonnn
      @c.eastonnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oh nah dont say that 💀

  • @soupbae3542
    @soupbae3542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Already imagining WW3. No electricity, no internet, scarcity of food, loud missile noises every minute, living in the dark.

    • @Indrid__Cold
      @Indrid__Cold 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It won't really be "living" just marking time. I'd rather be vaporized.

    • @cherokeevolfusa2891
      @cherokeevolfusa2891 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you live in the americas you will be untouched until nukes fly. Then if you don't live in major cities you still won't be touched.

    • @arvintyree1109
      @arvintyree1109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Basically the dark ages but with fallout

    • @HylianJayAppears
      @HylianJayAppears 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      So...what Ukraine is going through right now?

    • @idontmakecontent4870
      @idontmakecontent4870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@HylianJayAppears yeah but worse

  • @LA-nl7ip
    @LA-nl7ip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    I feel like you’re giving far more credit to red missiles and missile defence systems then they deserve

    • @hamsterfromabove8905
      @hamsterfromabove8905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      China is much more competent at warfare than Russia is. It's better to be prepared for a very dangerous fight.

    • @topspot4834
      @topspot4834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Probably cause this was 6 months ago ... Russia's incompetence and China's inexperience will certainly have an impact.

    • @nibbax7772
      @nibbax7772 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@topspot4834 yup they’ll definitely use nukes and then nato and us will use nukes and then we’ll all die

    • @victorbudz8157
      @victorbudz8157 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, i guess thats his opinion

    • @rickmoore4776
      @rickmoore4776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what makes you think that? China and Russia are super powers with thousands of nukes.

  • @proteus404
    @proteus404 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Next you should do World War 4 .. Crickets vs Cockroaches

    • @Yippee-kiyay-Mclain
      @Yippee-kiyay-Mclain 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The crickets would win, with their high numbers of support ants, as the inferior support for the cockroaches from the beetles means that the war would end rather quickly

  • @thelyonsden4937
    @thelyonsden4937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    This video is five months old, but knowing what we know now, this video gives way too much credit to Russia’s armed forces.

    • @theapple3160
      @theapple3160 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      not really, ukraine has fully nato aid and support, without this it would cease to exist, if world war 3 started ukraine would not get as much of the vital aid as it would go to countries like poland and be spread out, rather than a bottleneck for russia in ukraine

    • @chriswho12345
      @chriswho12345 ปีที่แล้ว

      better safe than sorry. same for the other power.

    • @didon8460
      @didon8460 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theapple3160 not so sure, it has nato support in term of technologic weaponary, but not so much in significative numbers. we also see that russian army is experiencing some huge problem due to corruption and logistic capabilities. You don't need technologic superiority to hold a front if your opponent is not capable of supllying his primar needs in ammunitions and material. Maybe no counterattacks, but holding the defences, gaining some time.
      26 billions have been sent to ukraine, it is already a lot, but not so much compared to NATO financial capacities. US were spending 20 billions in irak each year just for the climatisation supply. imagine if it were really fully supplied in ukraine...

    • @ServantofErra
      @ServantofErra ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theapple3160 Believe it or not, no. NATO and the US has been deliberately sending Ukraine gimped munitions and weapon system. The oldest stuff they have in stock in order to avoid any advanced stuff falling into Russian, and therefore, Chinese and Iranian hands, as well as to avoid escalating the war.
      Ukraine has been holding easily with 40 to 50 year old systems.

    • @tt128556
      @tt128556 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@theapple3160 It's far from full NATO support, they haven't even sent a single tank yet. Full support would mean sending fighter jets and other long-range weapon systems to really turn the tables.

  • @Leifthrasir
    @Leifthrasir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    The Gripen, Rafale, and Eurofighter are partial stealth planes as they are built out of radar absorbing composite materials, giving them a much greater reduced radar cross section compared to other 4th gen planes. Though not as reduced as the F-22 or F-35.

    • @spvillano
      @spvillano 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      True, they also failed to mention CAPTOR mines. A nice blanket of those, originally intended for the GIUK gap would do nicely in the Black Sea and in the strait along the Taiwanese coast.

    • @hoghogwild
      @hoghogwild 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As is the B-1B bomber. It has an RCS 100 times smaller than a B-52.

    • @flair500
      @flair500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      F-22 and F-35 dont have as good radar "hiding" abilities as Rafale I think

    • @didierpaya9069
      @didierpaya9069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      american channel, so...

    • @makeitrain8812
      @makeitrain8812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@flair500 Rafale is nothing compared to f35 what

  • @lucasplaygames1313
    @lucasplaygames1313 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I play Conflict of Nations since 2020 and this video give me an idea to win the half of the world in CON WW3!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!

  • @kevin9218
    @kevin9218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    The only thing I disagree with is the Chinese missile strike sinking one and heavily damaging multiple carriers. Looking at a carrier you might think such a hulking beast should be easy to hit, but when you consider the difficulty of targeting something from such range in the middle of the ocean moving in unpredictable ways, and the lack of ability to change the trajectory of a post-reentry hypersonic missile.. the number of missiles you would need to saturate a large enough area of ocean to have a decent chance of landing even a single hit is staggering.

    • @shemyazadrolfossendam8156
      @shemyazadrolfossendam8156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The aircraft Carrier is the modern equivalent of the battleship it is far more vulnerable to attack and would not Prove as decisive as it has been in prior military engagements

    • @rameira2716
      @rameira2716 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shemyazadrolfossendam8156 Yeah, an aircraft carrier is the modern equivalent of a ship that uses a completely different weapons system and doctrine to hit its targets and to defend itself. ????????????????????????????
      This is ignoring the fact they have uranium reactors, a classified top speed that eclipses most ships of its class, CIWS, air assets, the ability to not need refueling for the better half of TWO decades, advanced radar, and an entire complimentary element to further defend them from "hypersonic missile threats".
      ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
      Yeah bro, just the battleship of our time.

    • @AsreiMurasame
      @AsreiMurasame 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@shemyazadrolfossendam8156 With one major exception it moves far faster than a battleship (top known is 41 knots but actual top speed is classified) aka they can go faster than 41 knots at full speed and they're loaded with CIWS's.

    • @MichaelSmith-lm5sl
      @MichaelSmith-lm5sl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Also they have laser now

    • @jc2782
      @jc2782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That was the least believable part, the author bought into Chinese missile cope as well as Russian Air defence cope. The only way those numbers are remotely possible is if the carriers where immediately near Taiwan engaging the Chinese navy nit in the pacific dodging "600" missiles.

  • @getgaijoobed6219
    @getgaijoobed6219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Some of the things mentioned in this video are absolute best case scenario outcomes. For example, yes, Taiwan has diesel electric submarines (10:38), but they date from WW2 (though they have a modern one in development). Another example is that in a conflict in the Pacific, China would probably target the in air refueling tankers using their J-20s (which was literally designed to be a stealthy long-range missile bus, perfect for this role) instead of engaging superior US air power head on, thus bringing the curse of distance on the USAF.

    • @samuelelrod7421
      @samuelelrod7421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But the tankers would have escorts. Plus us satellites watching anything coming their way. They could leave or have interceptors come in.

    • @sixwingproductions
      @sixwingproductions 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i highly doubt chian has enough j-20's to even deploy them. like right now russia isn't deploying it's latest gear when it wouled be the perfect time to show what it can do. the problem is all the new toys can't do what china and russia are claiming and exsist in very small numbers likely not even being operational due to political corruption in arms procurment in these countries.

    • @getgaijoobed6219
      @getgaijoobed6219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@samuelelrod7421yes, they will probably be escorted. I’m just saying that’s probably what the J-20 was designed for, considering that the bay on that thing is approximately the same size as the long range PL-15. I disagree with the satellite thing though, even ships are hard to detect via satellite alone, so I’m curious as to what makes you think that satellites (even ones in geostationary orbits) would be able to immediately pick up and track fast moving jets?

    • @Oppteekap
      @Oppteekap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@getgaijoobed6219 it is possible to track planes via satellites. However expensive and impractical that is

    • @downix
      @downix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@samuelelrod7421 satellites are not real-time. Sure, they can tell you 8 hours later, but for real time you would need AWACS, which would be less useful against the J-20.

  • @jynxyouowemeasoda5066
    @jynxyouowemeasoda5066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    I love how this channel went from just facts to theoretical with facts looked at to make possible outcomes it makes it interesting

    • @shanep2369
      @shanep2369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤣 right 🤭

    • @necrogenesis1981
      @necrogenesis1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This isn't a theory, this is the inevitable future at this rate.

    • @EmperorProd
      @EmperorProd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@necrogenesis1981 if Russia nukes America or Ukrainie

    • @necrogenesis1981
      @necrogenesis1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@EmperorProd which is going to happen, Putin is crazy. I might as well skip writing my will since nobody will be left anyway.

    • @EmperorProd
      @EmperorProd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@necrogenesis1981 might as well try to enjoy life while we can

  • @StevenSeagull6969
    @StevenSeagull6969 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Putin would launch all his nukes in the first hour of WW3 and then go hide in an underground bunker.

  • @kdakan
    @kdakan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Each hour in this video should be a day or so in a real war. Ground operations are never that fast, every capturing of a city or even a town must be calculated based on intelligence collected, a battle is not a fist fight but rather a chess play.

    • @SarcasticTruth117
      @SarcasticTruth117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I agree. This video is mostly based on paper stats. For example, the amount of tanks and missiles each country holds. It's more of a show of brut force and nothing else. I doubt Russia and China would be half as successful as this video shows.

    • @matthewbarlow982
      @matthewbarlow982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@SarcasticTruth117 init evidence that this vid isn’t accurate is literally happening right now in Ukraine. Were they can’t even beat a singular country nvm 30 odd

    • @CakePrincessCelestia
      @CakePrincessCelestia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was my first thought as well, maybe even a week looking at how a certain operation currently is going...

    • @python5827
      @python5827 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SarcasticTruth117 i doubt us would practically survive even a month if ww3 starts. Chinese will because they are Asians who can survive in nature. USA will be wiped out of world within 15 days if china and russia join hands

  • @DovydasRybakas
    @DovydasRybakas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    I love how for the end you hope a good ending.
    "And the world will end up in ashes..."

    • @Defender78
      @Defender78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the burning oil in the sea 16:12 yikes! good idea tho

    • @epic_moments1000
      @epic_moments1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      african countries will survive.!!!!

    • @DovydasRybakas
      @DovydasRybakas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@epic_moments1000 survive what?

  • @darenstroud6254
    @darenstroud6254 2 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    I think this video over estimates the abilities of the Russian and Chinese military.

    • @kyliepechler
      @kyliepechler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Not to mention it leaves out the use of nukes being deployed very early on.

    • @benwatso
      @benwatso 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yea, it’s pretty biased

    • @ghostofantarctica8216
      @ghostofantarctica8216 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe Russia, but Idk about China. Only China knows whats going on in China.

    • @ghostofantarctica8216
      @ghostofantarctica8216 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chinas policy is to get Taiwan to join China peacefully. If all efforts fail, military force will be used as a last resort

    • @Today97129
      @Today97129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Yea overestimating is better than underestimating

  • @Sometimes_Happiness
    @Sometimes_Happiness 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    So which interstate problems that are currently ongoing could combine to create WW3? I've got the following:
    1. China v. Taiwan
    2. Russia v. NATO
    3. North Korea v. South Korea
    4. Pakistan v. India
    5. Iran v. Israel
    6. Iran v. Saudi Arabia
    7. Russia v. Japan
    8. China v. Vietnam
    .... am I missing any?

    • @CodeUK93
      @CodeUK93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Britain v. Argentina (Fawklands 2.0) seems like a possibility (china has recently been backing Argentina’s claim to the island(s).

    • @tomfooIeryz
      @tomfooIeryz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Israel v. Palestine

    • @soupbae3542
      @soupbae3542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      China vs america
      China vs Southeast asian countries.

    • @fault.
      @fault. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Me v You 😤😤

    • @__Man_
      @__Man_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm assuming Russia and Nato. Russia has threatened the west repeatedly, and ordered that the west stop supplying equipment to Ukraine. Russia state news has said that the sinking of the Moskva has already started WWIII, since the west supplied the missiles that sunk it.

  • @di-vini-ty876
    @di-vini-ty876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    hello info show! love this channel, hope y’all doing well

  • @phantomizer3542
    @phantomizer3542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I love the fact that the gun australia is holding is actually upsidedown

  • @The.Sages.Corner
    @The.Sages.Corner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only thing here is the Geneva Convention forbid nukes. Granted War is War, but if any country wanted to "redraw lines"; then nukes wouldnt be used for occupancy.

  • @ProfessorxVile
    @ProfessorxVile 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    1) Watch the movie "Threads"
    2) Use this as motivation to develop an 'exit plan' that can be quickly enacted in the event of nuclear war
    3) Sit back and wait, you've done all you can do

    • @randomtransportguyx4397
      @randomtransportguyx4397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I live in Sheffield I'm not making that mistake again

    • @dmarino1752
      @dmarino1752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If it’s any consolation, most nukes these days aren’t city busters so they only affect somewhere in between 7-20 miles I think. Not to mention most targets would be military targets rather than just attacking every city.

    • @LionofMandalore
      @LionofMandalore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dmarino1752 Military locations and large food supplies. RIP wheat fields 🌾

    • @evorock
      @evorock 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randomtransportguyx4397 have you been listening to 4 minutes of threads by the atomic hobo. If not, I strongly recommend it. It's a fantastic podcast!

    • @33Donner77
      @33Donner77 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd be in the bureucratic bunker, and quietly go to sleep for lack of air.

  • @DavidJr.11
    @DavidJr.11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Thanks for the Help! You just increased my Anxiety!

    • @jordaniansniper934
      @jordaniansniper934 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then turn on your brain and think.... Russia wont touch any other country for YEARS, for sure as war in Ukraine is total failure for them: 0 major objectives during 56 days, heavy losses and their economy is being destroyed. So dont live in unnecessary fear and enjoy ur life....

    • @DavidJr.11
      @DavidJr.11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not all wars was Fought out of logic and comprehensible reasons and it's a Fact!

  • @diversejoe617
    @diversejoe617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ww3: it's only a matter of time
    Ww4 and 5: *Coming soon to theaters*

  • @Gabo135790
    @Gabo135790 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Watching this a year later is so much fun xD

  • @Wonkabar007
    @Wonkabar007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    And it all ends with a "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" Alpha-Omega cobalt bomb 🙈💥

    • @gabormarkhardy7324
      @gabormarkhardy7324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With bomb worshipping mind reading mutants

    • @MrGean83
      @MrGean83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Called Monkeypox lol

    • @kaziu312
      @kaziu312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🗽

  • @Max-jy9qb
    @Max-jy9qb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Finland: am I a joke to you?
    Great video but seriously, how did they manage to ignore Finland so hard?

    • @therealpinkyskull
      @therealpinkyskull 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      because the fins are still using Viking equipment.

    • @CakePrincessCelestia
      @CakePrincessCelestia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Give the Finns all those Note 7s and they'll mop the floor with the Russian Army :)

    • @davidd6972
      @davidd6972 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha! Funny Meme!

    • @ReZaReKtA340
      @ReZaReKtA340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're so right , Finland would be capital if there was a conflict with Russia...

    • @KyleBc95
      @KyleBc95 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There wouldnt be much special about finland during world war 3 they would back nato and thats it.. I'm from canada and the same. We would just back the USA

  • @samuelwojciak8037
    @samuelwojciak8037 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I appreciate the process that have gone into making this video, really, thumbs up.

    • @crankychris2
      @crankychris2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, the mid 90's graphics and narrative remind me of teaching an A/V class at West Junior High School.
      Seriously, I have a Dell computer with Windows 98 that I can donate to you, it will really enhance your video production quality over what you are using now. ;))

    • @samuelwojciak8037
      @samuelwojciak8037 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crankychris2 I was on about the actual content, research and thought

  • @bluesea2023
    @bluesea2023 ปีที่แล้ว

    best last 42 seconds to a YT video ever!!!

  • @robbiebankz
    @robbiebankz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    I can only imagine how much work this videos took to create. Awesome work🙌 These videos are more intense then a lot of Hollywood movies. Imagine if all of this where to happen. Nothing short of intense.

    • @screechingonions2365
      @screechingonions2365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think your favorite word is intense

    • @pepedon1924
      @pepedon1924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Intense hehe

    • @ouiouimonami8704
      @ouiouimonami8704 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trolllolololol

    • @randallvickers8509
      @randallvickers8509 ปีที่แล้ว

      He just gives Russia and China too much credit got to remember America's been at war for 20 years they're pretty good at it

    • @The_Conqueeftador
      @The_Conqueeftador ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even just 4 months ago you should of known how silly this video was based on Russia's performance.

  • @nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262
    @nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo1262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    KEEP ON DOING THE GREAT WORK MAN

  • @nareeeely
    @nareeeely 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Day by day would be more accurate than hour by hour. Awesome work.

    • @billy2069
      @billy2069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I disagree hour by hours makes sense. This stuff has to happen quick if the attacks are over Taiwan and Western Europe. If they do it slow and allow NATO and Allies to mobilize it could be a massive loss of lives with no result creating unrest from within the attacking countries.

    • @alexaxy3328
      @alexaxy3328 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome work? This guy thinks Russia will defeat the whole Europe ...
      Meanwhile, Russia is losing to Ukraine.

    • @nareeeely
      @nareeeely 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexaxy3328 Theyre not, actually NATO is losing. Their economy is going down energy prices are at their highest, the UK prime minister just resigned. Dont listen to CNN just watch the broader picture.

    • @alexaxy3328
      @alexaxy3328 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nareeeely nice try, troll.

    • @nareeeely
      @nareeeely 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexaxy3328 lol ok

  • @Substitutor
    @Substitutor ปีที่แล้ว

    What an uplifting video

  • @skittlemen1
    @skittlemen1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I love videos like this! Great work! You guys should make another one is these but have it be like an hour long! Lol

  • @jonathanbell306
    @jonathanbell306 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    If only we directed all that effort, energy and money into massages, mushrooms and pizza we'd all be so much better off

    • @tylerredforge5563
      @tylerredforge5563 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm all for that, except mushrooms

    • @davidfinch7407
      @davidfinch7407 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not so sure. One B-1 bomber can cost &1,000,000,000. That is a terrifying amount of massages we would all have to endure, and we would all be dead from trying to ingest all that pizza.

  • @PutingPinoy
    @PutingPinoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Weird to have a video sponsorship (or was that just part of the editing/script) about WW3 as it is possibly nigh at hand.

  • @LawrenceKennard
    @LawrenceKennard ปีที่แล้ว

    The end of the video was supreme!

  • @stefantsarev4442
    @stefantsarev4442 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video had some major misses:
    - Iran was not included in the picture. They have signed a strategic partnership with Russia to aid each other in case of a war. Iran will aid with oil and other supplies, but more importantly, it has a strong Navy which implements swarm tactics specifically designed to battle US Navy Carrier groups. It may either attack the US 5th fleet in Bahrain directly, or block the Strait of Hormuz, thus preventing reinforcements;
    - India has been a strong strategic ally to Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. Russia has supplied the Indian Forces with many weapons, including an aircraft carrier (INS Vikramiditya is a Kiev-class carrier, the same as Admiral Kusnetsov) and SU-57 5th gen fighters. With an agreement to split the Indian Ocean into areas of influence, India, Iran and China may block the US Navy from getting any aid from its 5th Fleet in Bahrain.
    - Turkey is part of NATO, but has strong economic ties with Russia and is often pressured by the European Union. It is possible that it may change sides, in order to solidify its area of influence and help Iran as a fellow Islamic state;
    - South Korea, as a strong ally to NATO, will aid Taiwan, and that may be an issue, because that will trigger a response from North Korea, forcing the country to fight on two fronts: defending its own border and helping the Allied forces of US, Japan and Australia against China. The South Korean forces are great and well-prepared, so they will be a significant aid to the Allies.
    - North Korea, being a strong ally to China, will aid China in its pursuit to conquer Taiwan, as well as defend itself against the Allied forces. It will also use this as an opportunity to cross the 38th Parallel to "reclaim" South Korea, effectively re-igniting the Korean War. North Korean hackers will aid China against any Western breaches, which will significantly strengthen The Great Firewall of China;
    - We may even see the Taliban join China, since they recently became allies;
    - It is very important to notice that most of the NATO forces, specifically the US Pacific fleet in San Diego and Pearl Harbor, may have serious issues with navigating towards Taiwan in their process to send reinforcements. Why? Because they won't have GPS: in case of World War III, one of the first things that will be taken out will be the satellites used for navigation.
    Ultimately, we may see several fronts in the advancement of WWIII - a Polish, a Taiwanese, a Korean and a Persian, possibly one in the Balkans as well if Turkey switches sides. Either way, the war is going to be much more interesting and versatile than the video shows.

  • @fusiondrip
    @fusiondrip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Choose your strategy wisely, will you:
    1. Focus on building up country's economic might
    2. Politics game and forge long lasting alliances
    3. Declaring war on everyone and rely on military prowess
    Also Putin: 3 is not that bad tho

    • @raidang
      @raidang 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He did all of the above what a chad

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      First strategy is the best

    • @anasqader3851
      @anasqader3851 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      China is doing the first one

  • @omsymosh
    @omsymosh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Very captivating, kudos to the scriptwriter they got me hooked for 33 minutes.

    • @stephenlade5574
      @stephenlade5574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't help but wonder if this is some fuktup cia site......

    • @JasonMomos
      @JasonMomos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Propaganda have to be enticing.

  • @Moldova-Ball
    @Moldova-Ball 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was really confused when I clicked on an infographics video and saw the conflict of nations logo.
    Best game

  • @matttuballa4907
    @matttuballa4907 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    There’s always no happy ending when it comes to war 😢

    • @berennicholas5003
      @berennicholas5003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what if no one gets injured no building or anything damaged and all that happens is the sudden advancement in tech due to the wartime we get a new iphone

    • @dumbshit2353
      @dumbshit2353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@berennicholas5003 so whats the name of the new drug you are high on rn

    • @zoomzoom3510
      @zoomzoom3510 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      in fact we are advancing a lot i tech , soon Artificial Intelligence AI of Elon Musk is advancing a lot and phones are the most used , TV soon won't be needed

    • @TheIndispensableOpposition
      @TheIndispensableOpposition 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@berennicholas5003 I don't think you know what war is

    • @kodeska8784
      @kodeska8784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Beast titan: "Isn't war such a terrible thing"

  • @user-jb4hs4op7y
    @user-jb4hs4op7y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Interesting event. Do you guys know when it is going to be hosted? Looks like a lot of fun

    • @layachaz7318
      @layachaz7318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Can't wait for the 4K movie aren't you? 😏

    • @unskilled822
      @unskilled822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      i bet there will be alot of aliens just outside earth with popcorn looking how apes go apesh1t

    • @zero-ui1ew
      @zero-ui1ew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TODAY at 13:00 am get ready

    • @angryaromatisse1801
      @angryaromatisse1801 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm sure it'll be sometime in our lifetime :0

  • @troutwarrior6735
    @troutwarrior6735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I think Russian capabilities were highly overstated in this scenario

    • @eclkt
      @eclkt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yup, Russia can’t even beat Ukraine.

    • @thegalhorowitz
      @thegalhorowitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Even Germany and Turkey alone could hold Russia down just 1-2 members of Nato. Its all about high level collaboration, newest technology ( which Russia doesnt produce and morale is extremely low which is the main issue... )

    • @princeguillermo347
      @princeguillermo347 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eclkt yea without US they can obliterate Ukraine in a week or so

    • @sanjuro1180
      @sanjuro1180 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thegalhorowitz Would the morale also be very low when the Nato tanks will drive into Russia? i don't think so.. so it better is not to count in moral in a video like this.

    • @Taed
      @Taed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well you gotta think about it the entire world was fooled by Russias TRUE military might...On paper the video is pretty accurate but in reality we have seen that Russia isn't nearly as formidable as we all thought...I still think China would prove to be a different beast on its own though

  • @airprok8328
    @airprok8328 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    F 18’s are also low on radar visibility compared to normal 4th gen especially working with growlers and lightings

  • @Eyebagdude
    @Eyebagdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    DONT GIVE ME A HEAT ATTACK LIKE THAT

    • @kmg9359
      @kmg9359 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But whyyy ):

    • @Eyebagdude
      @Eyebagdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kmg9359 I thought that I was gonna die at the hands of the Russians sorry if a was a bit mad at them

    • @jordaniansniper934
      @jordaniansniper934 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Eyebagdude but russia wont win conventional war vs NATO in any scenerio xd and nuclear war is suicide for them so that's impossible too. Do you see what's happening in Ukraine? Their losses are huge, it takes time to make it up and still 0 major objectives during 56 days... So Russia wont do anything to NATO territory and ur fear is unnecessary

  • @rhbhero5656
    @rhbhero5656 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Bro I watch your video in the shower to start my day. Very noice videos.

    • @ajcates9136
      @ajcates9136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep I like the content too it’s pretty good

    • @Finalizor
      @Finalizor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I hope your phone is waterproof

    • @ajcates9136
      @ajcates9136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Finalizor lol

    • @rhbhero5656
      @rhbhero5656 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @RBT THUNDER I put my phone in a pocket meant for showers 😂

    • @rhbhero5656
      @rhbhero5656 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Finalizor water resistance

  • @streamer_services
    @streamer_services 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    As it is with most things in life.... Not the ending that you want but the ending that you will probably get and deserve.

  • @samscharp3367
    @samscharp3367 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This video hasn't aged well. Russia was given wayyyyyy too much credit for competence. I don't see the Chinese impacting the US navy this bad either.

  • @adnanadil4498
    @adnanadil4498 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The title- "World War III" and the end- "Goodbye, wonderful world", say it all. :)

  • @theodoredy
    @theodoredy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Meanwhile Russia trying to conquer one Ukrainian city for 3 month: 🗿

    • @astonTH
      @astonTH 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Deliberately. If they wanted to they could. Rather elongate the war & bring the world into financial ruin (currently happening and a lot more evident a month further on)

    • @philipbarton2056
      @philipbarton2056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Six months ago I would have agreed with him but Ukraine has shown that the Russian threat is massively over estimated.

  • @TheDCGuitar13
    @TheDCGuitar13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    The part of war people never think about is even when outclassed, the enemy will inevitably take sons away from their mothers. Our advanced gear doesent come with 9 lives

    • @onegoodthought6581
      @onegoodthought6581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Policy in US says any new draft shall be gender neutral. So next time sons and daughters will be going to war.

    • @MrArthoz
      @MrArthoz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taking sons away is the least of the problem. Nukes will take everything away...all life and all hope for a future in an irradiated environment. Well, hopefully just the region around Russia, China, Europe and USA...we in the Southeast Asia would just sit back and wait for the show to end.
      It will be a future of hardship and economic disaster...but at least we'll come out intact compared to any other nations foolish enough to get involved with ww3. I guess being the only civilized world left, Asia, Africa and South America would be the future world power next.
      Also pray there won't be a decade of nuclear winter. Here in the tropics we might just finally get to know what snow is like...colder climates might suffer terribly. In history of past natural disaster, there have been recorded of year without summer. Terrible time of sickness, famine and death.

  • @WineOnTheDime
    @WineOnTheDime ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Well...that was a casually neutral tone for the ending...

  • @muhammadluqmanal-hakimbina2804
    @muhammadluqmanal-hakimbina2804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Never been this early

    • @tr1nity278
      @tr1nity278 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to the club

  • @ivanrizzo5513
    @ivanrizzo5513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was more entretaiment than a hollywood movie . Seeing this at this moment in time makes me think how humanity is walking on very thin line and things can go south in a moment.

  • @JarradSager
    @JarradSager 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Definitely would like to see more videos like this one!!!

  • @chuckgan
    @chuckgan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This game seriously interests me. I am just now seeing the video, but do you know if it is still available? What platforms?

  • @pantoastado1264
    @pantoastado1264 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It shocks me more people don't realize we keep getting closer day by day

    • @superyamky
      @superyamky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I already realised it ever since the invasion of Ukraine started

    • @brandonfaubert7180
      @brandonfaubert7180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea I get that. We are 3 months since your comment and we are that much closer.

    • @pantoastado1264
      @pantoastado1264 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brandonfaubert7180 It just keeps escalating 😭😭