How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2023
  • Go to get.atlasvpn.com/ModernMuscle to get a 3-year plan for just $1.83 a month. It’s risk free with Atlas’s 30 day money back guarantee!
    Today we’re going explore the unthinkable: How would the United States respond during a Nuclear conflict?
    When we first came up with this concept, we aimed to cover the America's Nuclear Triad and it's Russian Nuclear War Plan in one concise video, but one video turned into three. So here's full version of "How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?" as it was originally intended. Enjoy!
    Sources:
    Probable Nuclear Targets in United Kingdom, 1972: robedwards.typepad.com/files/...
    Probable Nuclear Targets in France: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
    Soviet Union Central European Target List, 1979: brilliantmaps.com/ww3-europe/
    United States Target List, 1956: nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/...
    Probable United States Counterforce Targets: dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/hand...
    US Russian Counterforce Target List:
    www.nrdc.org/sites/default/fi...
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @ModernMuscle213
    @ModernMuscle213  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    Go to get.atlasvpn.com/ModernMuscle to get a 3-year plan for just $1.83 a month. It’s risk free with Atlas’s 30 day money back guarantee!

    • @masternobody1896
      @masternobody1896 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      just use water. you can kill all nukes from russia and china

    • @wartimefuntime
      @wartimefuntime 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Love your briefing videos very informative and professionally done

    • @hystonix
      @hystonix 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      🐀

    • @llibressal
      @llibressal 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's the name of the music?

    • @rogerlemagnifique7415
      @rogerlemagnifique7415 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@WhYArEYouSoSeRiOuS This is what happens when you believe in hollywood, when you think you're exceptional, but the reality is that Marvel don't gonna be there, sorry kids.

  • @dcred123
    @dcred123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3732

    Winning a nuclear war is just as terrible as losing it.

    • @panzerkampfwagenviiimaus7025
      @panzerkampfwagenviiimaus7025 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, the dead loser or the living loser.

    • @kflow1379
      @kflow1379 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +436

      Not really. A better way to say this is that nuclear war is bad for everyone. Winning is obviously better than losing.

    • @Neosapiant
      @Neosapiant 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +251

      @@kflow1379 Or is it better not to start?

    • @kflow1379
      @kflow1379 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

      @@Neosapiant that's what I said but in a different way

    • @j8hi7oj78ju8n
      @j8hi7oj78ju8n 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

      No one wins in a war

  • @DoNotTredOnMe
    @DoNotTredOnMe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +213

    “A strange game”
    “The only winning move is not to play.”

    • @thomasmrf.brunner
      @thomasmrf.brunner หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
      - B.Russell
      The nuclear arsenals of mass destruction, which are still not eliminated in spite of the UN charter, but well maintained and modernized and capable of multiple overkill, with whose deterrence powerful minorities may assert territorial claims to power and thereby put the entire human species and civilization at risk, although after an intentionally or unintentionally triggered nuclear war no more inhabitable territories remain in the following nuclear winter (which indicates an intelligence deficit bordering on mental derangement...)
      need - in contrast to the heavily thematized climate change - with escalating nuclear war only a few days for the irreversible extinction of the human species and civilization - already after 5 hours the entire death rate of the 6 years long raging 2nd world war (thus 60.000.000 dead) would be exceeded .
      That on Monday, the 26th September 1983 this irreversible downfall was prevented by the refusal of a firing order of the lieutenant colonel Stanislaw Petrow, who was on duty by proxy, which took place on wrongly interpreted observation data, is communicated remarkably just as little of the consequence of this decision appropriately for the public as the nuclear self-destruction capacity which is to be measured permanently ready after few days...
      What is to be thought of an "intelligent" species which accepts to be completely threatened with irreversible extinction by powerful minorities for the enforcement of competing power systems, and which invests so much money and technical know-how in the provision and maintenance of its own destruction ?

    • @Aragon9th
      @Aragon9th หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I loved that movie.

    • @Newdivide
      @Newdivide 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Wargames

    • @thomasmrf.brunner
      @thomasmrf.brunner 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      "War does not determine who is right - only who is left." - B.Russell
      The last game...

    • @yeboiepiktrix524
      @yeboiepiktrix524 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      "How about a nice game of chess?"

  • @myeternalsin
    @myeternalsin หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    What’s kind of scary is this is just what’s public knowledge, who knows what else they have created over the years in secret.

  • @zachhoward9099
    @zachhoward9099 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +408

    The fact that humanity could literally undo millennia of progress in less time then it would take you to eat dinner at a sit down restaurant is chilling

    • @loudermusic
      @loudermusic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      humanity? no, just 2 o 3 countries

    • @sketis2012
      @sketis2012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Same applies to many things in life like reputation, relationships etc.

    • @jsdowling1989
      @jsdowling1989 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes.

    • @chriseppler7291
      @chriseppler7291 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@loudermusicHave you heard of radiation? There would be economic collapse that would cause starvation and anarchy globally.

    • @hirensankey8578
      @hirensankey8578 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank God we have IQ tests 😂​@@loudermusic

  • @robertmaybeth3434
    @robertmaybeth3434 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1324

    40 years ago I was a US Air Force pneumatic/hydraulic technician on the Titan II ICBM in the Wichita Kansas area. Our shop not only repaired hydraulic functions on the missile but also the pop-up antenna (that automatically raised after a nuclear attack), plus the locking lugs on the blast doors (these were the huge doors made of ferro-reinforced concrete in between the silo and the launch crew area to protect the crew long enough to turn the keys and launch the missile).
    Since our job was only to make sure the "bird" would actually work if the nuclear apocalypse happened, the Air Force taught us absolutely nothing about surviving a nuclear war, probably since it was pointless, and that was fine by me. Because one thing I realized on my own right away about surviving a nuclear war, is that I have no interest in surviving a nuclear war.

    • @jonjolly253
      @jonjolly253 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

      Yep. There are worse things in life than dying.

    • @The_1ntern3t
      @The_1ntern3t 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Thanks for sharing this! Do you know what would trigger the antenna to raise? Your comment makes me think it was expected for some bunkers to survive and launch after the first incoming nukes had already landed? Fascinating and terrifying at the same time

    • @leeargent58
      @leeargent58 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Ye it's a key turn launch process so why does everyone always say their going to push the fucking button 😂

    • @CertifiedAbyssGazer
      @CertifiedAbyssGazer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

      After a nuclear war, I don't think anyone wants a single american or russian to survive either.

    • @stevent6614
      @stevent6614 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@jonjolly253yes there is. Unjustly destroying a persons life, and then expecting them to try and keep living, is worse than dying, imo.

  • @user-is6ec7ee5d
    @user-is6ec7ee5d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +192

    Plans look good on paper. Then, the sneaky Chinese drop an anvil on you from a party balloon.

    • @sonicboom4732
      @sonicboom4732 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      At least we know Chinas ICBMs might as well be water balloons 😂

    • @InquisitorMatthewAshcraft
      @InquisitorMatthewAshcraft หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@sonicboom4732 Manufacturer Acme Corporation 😂😅

    • @voidtempering8700
      @voidtempering8700 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@sonicboom4732 People are still spouting this propoganda point. Watch Perun or Sandboxx to learn what is actually happening.

    • @nicolethompson8613
      @nicolethompson8613 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      😂😂😂

  • @tnitty9317
    @tnitty9317 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    That siren noise is the most erie noise ever. That shit is legit scary. Gives me chills

    • @yourfabuloushappymann5154
      @yourfabuloushappymann5154 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's the same siren for tornadoes down here....hair raising...

    • @joshjensen4711
      @joshjensen4711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It makes me physically ill even thinking about that siren

    • @martales8563
      @martales8563 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hope you hear it 😂

    • @Eduard-jg7gt
      @Eduard-jg7gt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ukrainians hearing it every day

    • @majestyne
      @majestyne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      99% sure it's from the game DEFCON. Global thermonuclear war arcade simulator.

  • @painting1989
    @painting1989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    This is absolutely insane to even imagine, I pray this never happens

    • @siyandadlamini496
      @siyandadlamini496 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      You have to play part of it not happening. Politicians weaponize your lack of information and participation in democracy but keeping you busy and misinforming you.

  • @JoannaHammond
    @JoannaHammond 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +716

    The first rule of nuclear war, nobody wins a nuclear war.

    • @dickc.normous6369
      @dickc.normous6369 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not true. We won that one against Japan in the 40s. Nukes were used, ergo, that war went nuclear.
      I believe you meant peer nuclear war

    • @darthsilversith667
      @darthsilversith667 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      *Skynet* has entered the chat:

    • @JoannaHammond
      @JoannaHammond 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@mygirlfriendsbootyphat I don't even think he's crazy enough to start a nuclear war, he'll bluster but I don't think he would. Now Prigozhin just might.

    • @dickc.normous6369
      @dickc.normous6369 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mygirlfriendsbootyphat if he truly didn't give a fuck he would've started using nuclear artillery already

    • @CertifiedAbyssGazer
      @CertifiedAbyssGazer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Misanthropes: lol k

  • @untouchable360x
    @untouchable360x 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1750

    Not nuclear missiles. It's "special military projectiles."

    • @theairdropperhypehouse9290
      @theairdropperhypehouse9290 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      😂😂😂

    • @DrakeingNbakeing
      @DrakeingNbakeing 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Jesus 😂😂😂

    • @skp8748
      @skp8748 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      Its not an illegal invasion its operation Ukrani freedom 😂

    • @cs-rj8ru
      @cs-rj8ru 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      That's funny.....Lets see how funny it is when one hits your hometown of Detroit?

    • @HerculesFit
      @HerculesFit 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂

  • @StephenBoothUK
    @StephenBoothUK 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Interesting to note that when you look at the Russian bases they are mostly very close to borders with other countries, mostly China. Any attack on them would look very much like an attack on the adjoining country.

    • @OlgaJockers
      @OlgaJockers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      had the same thought! at first i was just looking out for how screwed my german ass would be but yeah they really stationed these in a way that would cause major conflicts with pretty much everyone lol

    • @projectadmin5979
      @projectadmin5979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      У нас вся страна - одна большая децентрализованная военная база с массой приколов - вам кажется.

    • @StephenBoothUK
      @StephenBoothUK 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@projectadmin5979 Тем не менее, Россия была вынуждена стоять на месте страной, незначительной по размеру, используя 50-летние западные технологии и чистое мужество. Тем временем их мирные жители мерзнут в своих домах, потому что нет денег на содержание базовой инфраструктуры, в то время как жители Кремля живут в роскоши.

    • @RusRecon007
      @RusRecon007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@StephenBoothUK Insignificant? Ukraine is 2.5 times larger than Great Britain, NATO countries help it with everything it needs, but about heating you are very mistaken, the Soviet Union built an excellent heating infrastructure that still works, I have to open the windows in winter because sometimes it’s too hot, but I pay $40 a month for heating

    • @RusRecon007
      @RusRecon007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The bases are located not far from the railways, which stretch along the borders, in order to transport the army and supplies to the border of the country with which you are fighting as quickly as possible, and even this looks nearby on the map, but in reality it is thousands of kilometers

  • @Dre_Key
    @Dre_Key 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Makes nukes. Shoots at innocent uninvolved civilians. Hides in bunkers… evil and cowardice.

  • @granttyler7746
    @granttyler7746 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +686

    The scariest part of it all is that every leader in charge of the warheads knows they will have a safe place to go indefinitely if nuclear war breaks out.

    • @fromthefire4176
      @fromthefire4176 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

      Idk, they’d be stuck in a bunker with limited food and everything, and if they ever even could come out, the world is destroyed and there is nowhere to go. It’s not so bad, that’s much worse than death, especially for people who live to lord over others from luxury.

    • @elessartelcontar9415
      @elessartelcontar9415 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Nah, Sagan proved nuclear winter for 10 years after would kill us all. That's when the US and USSR started treaties that drastically reduced the obscene numbers of nukes both sides had.

    • @R6-D2
      @R6-D2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@elessartelcontar9415 He didn't prove anything.

    • @perrybb2
      @perrybb2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      ​@@elessartelcontar9415Absolutely no way 2 superpowers would make policy decisions that massive based on the assessment of 1 man.

    • @tonyhendrix8075
      @tonyhendrix8075 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Can anyone please tell me how any country has ever won a war.
      It's totally impossible.

  • @davidsingleton794
    @davidsingleton794 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +779

    I don't think people realize the amount of time and skill it probably took just to make and edit the visual and graphic part of this edit. Well done!

    • @richardslingerland426
      @richardslingerland426 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who gives a shit???

    • @tjhayes5801
      @tjhayes5801 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What program or application is used to create the missile trajectories and animations? I really like for some reason the syncing is really satisfying lol

    • @gg-gamers
      @gg-gamers 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nookalurr war he said

    • @floatinggoose9197
      @floatinggoose9197 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think that's the whole reason they are here. But good job seeming special or observant, giving credit where other comments wouldn't have 😮

    • @edkrstic6423
      @edkrstic6423 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately there will be a response regardless. What would be remaining is questionable at best!

  • @ashessynths8136
    @ashessynths8136 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I keep remembering a line from a movie: "It's NU-CLEAR!"
    This is a very well done explanation. Good job, and thank you.

    • @sartainja
      @sartainja 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My personal favorite (that I have fond memories of seeing on tv on a late night movie in July of 1976):
      Major T. J. Kong, Commander of the B-52 Leper Colony:
      “Well, boys, I reckon this is it. New-q-lure combat, toe-to-toe with the Rooskies.”

  • @dropatacoshell
    @dropatacoshell 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    "...in terms of disadvantages: there simply are none"

  • @ImSkittzle
    @ImSkittzle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +780

    I love how we actually think the government lets us know how many missiles we have

    • @11GalleryATV
      @11GalleryATV 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      Right? And where they are ...

    • @maynardburger
      @maynardburger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +212

      There's no reason to hide this man. The whole point of having nuclear weapons is deterrence, so it's best to loudly advertise what we have in this area, unlike with most other military assets and programs.

    • @allen480
      @allen480 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Yep, but they won’t fess up about their knowledge of UFOs

    • @Alphasig336
      @Alphasig336 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      @@maynardburgeryes and counties like Russia are more likely to exaggerate quantity and yield.

    • @Tarquinthetyrant
      @Tarquinthetyrant 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Yeah they probably exaggerate if anything

  • @chrisfox7393
    @chrisfox7393 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +377

    “I know not what weapons ww3 will be fought with, but ww4 will be fought with sticks and stones” - Albert Einstein

    • @user-td9mn4rm9y
      @user-td9mn4rm9y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When did stein made that speech🤔

    • @zachhoward9099
      @zachhoward9099 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@user-td9mn4rm9yit wasn’t in a speech but in an interview he had in 1949

    • @pete5819
      @pete5819 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      In that case, WW4 would most likely not be a war, but small groups of people in a Dystopian society fighting over limited resources. Now that is scary. I'd live in the woods trapping animals & fish. Assuming animals are still alive if some humans survive.

    • @krishgaming9080
      @krishgaming9080 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will survive to austrilia middle desert the most safest country​@@pete5819 during war

    • @BLOODYMOON62
      @BLOODYMOON62 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Call of duty ❤

  • @ChaoticAnswers
    @ChaoticAnswers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    There are submarines right now with the pure total power of WWII roaming around.

  • @joecraw9292
    @joecraw9292 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Would love to see more videos like this.. Thanks!

  • @jebbroham1776
    @jebbroham1776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +462

    A full scale nuclear exchange between all the major powers would basically send us back to the Dark Ages for a time.

    • @nicholaslennon
      @nicholaslennon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

      It would send EVERYTHING back to the dark ages for a time.

    • @TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA
      @TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dark ages? lol how about extinction. people tend to forget that the nuclear fallout will render large swaths of the earth uninhabitable outside of just russia and the usa. + it would cause a nuclear winter which willplunge the earth into darkness causing complete extinction of many plant and animal species worldwide including loss of food crops everywhere, the remainder of the planet that wasnt hit by nukes would slowly starve and suffer radiation. It would make the fallout games look tame. Huamity would be lucky it survived, or unlucky. The suffering pain etc of surviving a nuke is hell itself if you knew one was coming its better to go outside to ground zero where you expect it to hit, relax crack open a beer and wait

    • @opticfloyyyd
      @opticfloyyyd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Depends on which nations were hit. It’s possible some countries will not be affected

    • @treble8921
      @treble8921 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@opticfloyyydI don't think you understand how the global economy works. Every country on the planet would be massively affected by a global nuclear war on this premise alone.
      And that's not considering the environmental implications. It's likely that the entire planet would become uninhabitable, including everywhere that wasn't immediately affected by the weaponry.
      There's no guarantee that life would survive on the planet at any significant scale. Humanity could become entirely extinct.
      All over human greed and confident stupidity. I say pull the trigger before we leave the planet. Humanity in its current form is a cancer.

    • @procybit
      @procybit 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

      @@opticfloyyyd You know, hazards of THIS SCALE could cover the whole world... (because of wind, ocean and animal spreading)

  • @Litepaw
    @Litepaw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +128

    "Ending millions of lives with the push of a button is typically frowned upon"
    Yeah i would say so.

    • @Markos581973
      @Markos581973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Billions

    • @elessartelcontar9415
      @elessartelcontar9415 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "A death or a dozen deaths are tragedies, a million deaths is just a statistic." - Josef Stalin
      You've got to remember that the USSR had 30,000,000 deaths in WWII and he was OK with it as long as he got the end game he wanted, and, he did.

    • @aaz1992
      @aaz1992 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Seems rather haram

    • @benitoamilcare7862
      @benitoamilcare7862 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We could argue that the world leaders are at the same level of god, since they have the possibility to decide if humanity must extinguish or not.
      Therefore Biden is a god for us humans😃.
      P.S i strongly believe that in the year 2080 our civilization will cease to exist.

    • @tedebayer1
      @tedebayer1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't kid yourself, ALL those psychos in power, from everywhere, past and present in reality have little to no regard for human life

  • @supiferous9739
    @supiferous9739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I like the way he says “nookala”
    Makes a subject like this much more digestible

  • @ItzCosmix.
    @ItzCosmix. หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "A strange game, the only winning move is not to play"
    -first strike

  • @manzell
    @manzell 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

    The operators will never get cold feet. They execute the launch procedure every day - always with incorrect codes, so the missiles never fire. It's a daily drill. When the time comes, they'll never know that it's different than any other procedure until it's too late.

    • @darthsilversith667
      @darthsilversith667 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Unless.. they’ve already done their drill for the day and they get the sirens again just hours later.

    • @manzell
      @manzell 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@darthsilversith667 it's several times a day

    • @rigcun
      @rigcun 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      So cool if its true

    • @LegendaryCollektor
      @LegendaryCollektor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Whats ur source?

    • @EarthsGeomancer
      @EarthsGeomancer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@manzellfake expert

  • @boogiewoogie3101
    @boogiewoogie3101 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +254

    Having watched a nuclear war simulation in the command post of the local Air Base, many years ago. I realized that it would be impossible to get far enough away from the base to survive. I decided I’d just twist up a big fatty and go see what I trained for in elementary and middle school. It won’t last long enough to register in my brain before it’s over.

    • @darrinsiberia
      @darrinsiberia 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Even on a dirt bike.

    • @DustDevilRage
      @DustDevilRage 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Puff puff pass

    • @mwt5040
      @mwt5040 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@DustDevilRageno pass id face my last solo

    • @JoseChavez-it3uf
      @JoseChavez-it3uf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      READ REVELATION IN THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. IT WILL TELL YOU ABOUT TOTAL DEVASTATION WORLDWIDE! THE RETURN JESUS CHRIST IS IMMINENT! AMEN. PERIOD!

    • @AwakenedAvocado
      @AwakenedAvocado 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Remember to get under the desk lol

  • @aj.9049
    @aj.9049 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    "In the nuclear age the true enemy is war itself." Denzel Washington in Crimson Tide.

    • @guillaume8437
      @guillaume8437 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "A single inescapable fact -- that mankind united with infinitely greater purpose in pursuit of war than he ever did in pursuit of peace." Equilibrium

  • @Kevan808
    @Kevan808 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Really enjoyed the sound effects with headphones on 👍🏼

  • @mmkr0000
    @mmkr0000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +296

    Don't forget the moles on both sides. Chance of a surprise attack is next to zero. Also each superpowers have backup of backup of backup plans. So, it's highly unlikely that all of their arsenals would be destroyed in a surprise attack no matter how well coordinated that attack might be.

    • @thomasmrf.brunner
      @thomasmrf.brunner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There will be no winners - mankind will have been destroyed for low motives of pretentious powerful minorities on highest technical level.
      Already after 5 hours of nuclear war the total death rate of the 6 years lasting 2nd world war will be exceeded (over 60.000.000 dead)
      - in the mutually assured annihilation there will be no major city with infrastructure on either side,
      the survivors will be wandering in a civilization desert without electricity and communication networks in the following nuclear winter
      realizing the irreversible extinction of their own species and civilization
      and envy the dead ...
      And mind you - this change by a nuclear war is not one of years, but of a few weeks.
      What is to be expected, I suppose, from an "intelligent" species that has taken from powerful minorities
      as an apparently reasonable price for the assertion of competing claims to power
      by means of the ready kept and well-behaved modernized nuclear arsenals of mass destruction
      with irreversible extinction in a nuclear holocaust and the following nuclear winter ?

    • @controversialjoe
      @controversialjoe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      This is the comments I was looking for ❤

    • @thomasmrf.brunner
      @thomasmrf.brunner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@hotchocexpresso
      Winter. Nuclear Winter 🤣

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, also I'm surprised he didn't mention Russia's nuclear Deadhand system designed to release every single nuclear weapon towards the attacker in the case everyone in Russia is dead.

    • @maynardburger
      @maynardburger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Absolutely nobody expects the ability to take out ALL nuclear capabilities of enemy. The point would simply to minimize them as much as possible in order to 'win' and not also suicide yourself completely.

  • @dexterbushrod3176
    @dexterbushrod3176 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Basically, mutual destruction with the land inhabitable even if you do survive. The crazy part is, we keep threatening each other knowing there would be mass destruction.

    • @orkopayp9338
      @orkopayp9338 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in russia working at best 5% of missiles (submarines), in china 15%. These monkeys lost for easy

    • @aaz1992
      @aaz1992 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *Humans!*

    • @AntonioPajeros
      @AntonioPajeros 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Просто политическая элита одной страны так сильно хочет доминировать во всём мире, что ради этой идеи готова уничтожить всё человечество.

    • @YesMan702
      @YesMan702 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@aaz1992politicians* no sane person wants this shit

    • @jsdowling1989
      @jsdowling1989 หลายเดือนก่อน

      M. A. D.

  • @Jay_Bless
    @Jay_Bless หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The assumption is that the Russians will sit back and watch the American missiles come.

    • @Yourbasicinfo
      @Yourbasicinfo วันที่ผ่านมา

      Russians don't have the technology to stop US nukes at Mach 10, US has some but it probably won't intercept most of it given the speed

  • @devoof
    @devoof 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Dude killed it with the visuals

    • @arjandikhoff5201
      @arjandikhoff5201 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I loved the visuals. The sound too. That sub launched attack on Russian cities with the siren noise was terrifying!

  • @rihasanatrofolo2472
    @rihasanatrofolo2472 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    7:28 this simple ilustration was incredibly scary and really puts into perspective how fast we can destroy ourselves

    • @KTO_HUBLOT
      @KTO_HUBLOT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's USSR nuking Baltics and Ukraine, their own members. Watch less of this crap 😂

    • @slimtim9570
      @slimtim9570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KTO_HUBLOTit’s based on old estimates but it’s not like Russia would shy away from nuking Ukraine in an all out war today, I think that’s been made clear by their attitude towards it in recent years

    • @jaygatsby5013
      @jaygatsby5013 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep in mind the UK is 2.5x smaller than Texas, so.

    • @MoratoryBasil
      @MoratoryBasil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@KTO_HUBLOTIt literally says at the bottom of the screen when the nukes hit the Baltics “United States”

    • @rockdesertsun8246
      @rockdesertsun8246 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah it's like "Poof -Kiss Yer Ass G'd Bye!"

  • @Shipfixer
    @Shipfixer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    So what it boils down to is, if there is a large scale nuclear war, we're pretty much screwed.

    • @whatroads4x4
      @whatroads4x4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Maybe if u live in some remote part of the world u wil be ok for sometime..till the nuclear winds get u

    • @realnapster1522
      @realnapster1522 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only western countries are screwed. Rest of the world including Asia, South America and Australia will live on

    • @jaylenflanagan1295
      @jaylenflanagan1295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We”ll all be dead

    • @AwakenedAvocado
      @AwakenedAvocado 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@whatroads4x4well where is remote enough?

    • @whatroads4x4
      @whatroads4x4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@AwakenedAvocado parts of africa, canadian tundra, andes moutains, gobi desert, iceland, greenland, parts of australia.

  • @georgemkirko9645
    @georgemkirko9645 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So good on a paper but in reality we might be all dead...

  • @robertshorthill6836
    @robertshorthill6836 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wanna see a scary movie? Watch an old one with Hank Fonda called Fail Safe. Here's what we face.

  • @jerrys5764
    @jerrys5764 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +628

    Man this series is a scary rollercoaster of emotions and thoughts😅 thanks for the hard work it’s very informative and entertaining but at the same time helps to get perspective on how much of a nightmare we are headed if we are not careful. The siren 🚨 sounds are epic and scary 😂

    • @cappiece3786
      @cappiece3786 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      In other words the end

    • @parishlarry21
      @parishlarry21 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Facts this is chilling🥶🫣

    • @cappiece3786
      @cappiece3786 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@parishlarry21 the end

    • @ryanpayne7707
      @ryanpayne7707 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      When you take your headphones off to ensure the sirens are not real...

    • @Wodion_Yt
      @Wodion_Yt 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One of the sounds are from the SCP foundation game in Roblox

  • @theNoNNo
    @theNoNNo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    and you also forgot to include Russia's failsafe in the event of a nuclear attack on Russia. in an attack on russia, russia will automatically respond by sending weapons back and if the enemy had managed to hit strategic targets in russia, the deadhand would have been activated and it would have resulted in all active nuclear weapons being sent to pre-programmed targets. mutual assured destruction

    • @orkopayp9338
      @orkopayp9338 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in russia working at best 5% of missiles (submarines), in china 15%. These monkeys lost for easy

    • @letsplaywar
      @letsplaywar 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Do you mean this? and I can only imagine how the system works to be honest.
      Fail-deadly is a concept in nuclear military strategy that encourages deterrence by guaranteeing an immediate, automatic, and overwhelming response to an attack, even if there is no one to trigger such retaliation. The term fail-deadly was coined as a contrast to fail-safe.

  • @chinitoyt3251
    @chinitoyt3251 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this was beautiful presented

  • @kevinjenkins8169
    @kevinjenkins8169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Plot twist: All nukes are actually a deterrent for alien species, and we never actually had any plans to use them on ourselves

    • @RipRLeeErmey
      @RipRLeeErmey 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Honestly, I could see aliens being totally blindsided by nukes because they never developed such "barbaric" weaponry after realizing what it could mean for their species as a whole

    • @warmtoast1408
      @warmtoast1408 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Except we already did, twice.

    • @kevinjenkins8169
      @kevinjenkins8169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@warmtoast1408 minor details

    • @AndreyShulen
      @AndreyShulen หลายเดือนก่อน

      Инопланетяне под пиво и рыбу смотрят сериал и делают ставки на то в каком веке человечество уничтожит себя.

    • @thomasmrf.brunner
      @thomasmrf.brunner หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
      - B.Russell
      The nuclear arsenals of mass destruction, which are still not eliminated in spite of the UN charter, but well maintained and modernized and capable of multiple overkill, with whose deterrence powerful minorities may assert territorial claims to power and thereby put the entire human species and civilization at risk, although after an intentionally or unintentionally triggered nuclear war no more inhabitable territories remain in the following nuclear winter (which indicates an intelligence deficit bordering on mental derangement...)
      need - in contrast to the heavily thematized climate change - with escalating nuclear war only a few days for the irreversible extinction of the human species and civilization - already after 5 hours the entire death rate of the 6 years long raging 2nd world war (thus 60.000.000 dead) would be exceeded .
      That on Monday, the 26th September 1983 this irreversible downfall was prevented by the refusal of a firing order of the lieutenant colonel Stanislaw Petrow, who was on duty by proxy, which took place on wrongly interpreted observation data, is communicated remarkably just as little of the consequence of this decision appropriately for the public as the nuclear self-destruction capacity which is to be measured permanently ready after few days...
      What is to be thought of an "intelligent" species which accepts to be completely threatened with irreversible extinction by powerful minorities for the enforcement of competing power systems, and which invests so much money and technical know-how in the provision and maintenance of its own destruction ?

  • @AJ-pc5ln
    @AJ-pc5ln 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    For perspective the Atomic weapon dropped on Hiroshima was 16kt and the one on Nagasaki was 21kt. 300kt -800kt nukes is apocalyptic type destruction terrifying weapons.

    • @DeathCluntch
      @DeathCluntch 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So it’s proof American politicians are the only crazy people enough to think nuclear war can be won .

    • @orhan74415
      @orhan74415 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      now there are megatons

    • @matthewsmiley3630
      @matthewsmiley3630 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Yep, and there are even megaton ones now. Ridiculous man

    • @MikesGarageReviews
      @MikesGarageReviews 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It should be 2000 Mega tons for Russia

    • @Triggatra4258
      @Triggatra4258 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@MikesGarageReviews...... There is no such thing. Biggest ever was 100 Megaton Tsar bomba from Russia. Stop making stuff up.

  • @ronfhs58
    @ronfhs58 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    The worst part of these conflicts is having to hear the "word" nukuler over and over.

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      It's so easy to practice vocal articulation and yet ... "summarines"

    • @jimarcher1437
      @jimarcher1437 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Came to say this. Made it hard to stay focused...

    • @mecdude
      @mecdude 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      nukuhler, summarines and subbarines. I just can’t do it lol

    • @ANelsonViolin
      @ANelsonViolin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fucking agree hard

  • @obo7707
    @obo7707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ive never realized the scale of a nuclear war , only data of potential targets , weapons used...but boy o boy , putting it all together with ALL the targets and ALL the weapons-is truly terrifying. Its like there would be not much left of either country-then factor in the other countries that could participate...wow

    • @user-tw9in7pc7l
      @user-tw9in7pc7l 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Америке хватит 10 ракет, России с её площадью 20 ракет, повезёт тому кто сразу умрёт остальные умрут от голода и радиации, будет всё заражено.

  • @Crimson_Hawk_01
    @Crimson_Hawk_01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The real question you missed is, how long would it take Joe Biden to find the launch codes?

  • @jemsq
    @jemsq 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +573

    Damn, the effort put into this series is exemplary. Excellent additional info and animations. Keep it up. Cant wait for the next.

    • @charge8sr
      @charge8sr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      lmao

    • @stuart6478
      @stuart6478 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      cartoons are real life

    • @FBidenFlagGuy
      @FBidenFlagGuy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yea, except he makes it look like Russia is all the way off the east coast of America when, in all actuality, Russia is off the coast of Alaska. 😂

    • @alerokilla419
      @alerokilla419 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He doesn’t know geographically where North Dakota and Montana are. And it’s “Nu-Clear” not “New-Q-Lur”

    • @MatthewLittle
      @MatthewLittle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Minot AFB is to the east of Malmstrom AFM, not the other way around.

  • @MGIndahouse100
    @MGIndahouse100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

    The scariest thing about nuclear war isn't how destructive the weapons are. Its how little time you have to say goodbye to loved ones 💔

    • @theschmedaparadox1018
      @theschmedaparadox1018 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's just stupid

    • @kennyc388
      @kennyc388 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      What loved ones ?

    • @EarthsGeomancer
      @EarthsGeomancer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Emotional

    • @carlosortega5130
      @carlosortega5130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah 15 minutes so better have a good bug out bag lols what a joke gimmick....

    • @bobmills2049
      @bobmills2049 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You've had almost 2 years

  • @PKellyC
    @PKellyC หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for sharing this information to our enemies. I can’t wait

  • @danielescobar7618
    @danielescobar7618 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Have you ever seen the videos or interviews of regular bomber crews watching their payloads hit? Its devastating. No one wins in this one. Its a hard job. I was air force as a maintainer. I appreciate those guys. Its not easy.. maybe when its insurgents you know wouldnt think twice, but bombs on workers and geound crew is a rough one.

  • @roberthunter479
    @roberthunter479 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    To quote War Games, "The only winning move is not to play".

    • @artificerdrachen6908
      @artificerdrachen6908 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Though nuclear war is the only game you can lose even if you don't play, thanks to the incoming nuclear winter.

  • @chopchop1488
    @chopchop1488 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    This was scarier then a lot of horror movies

    • @wcbranitly0692
      @wcbranitly0692 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Than*

    • @chopchop1488
      @chopchop1488 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wcbranitly0692 no! I have no respect for this English k

    • @ltmundy1164
      @ltmundy1164 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Fiction needs to sound plausible, however reality has no such restrictions.

    • @FasterthanSpeed414
      @FasterthanSpeed414 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      than*

  • @chancedafox2466
    @chancedafox2466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want the next part of the series so badly!

  • @alexmontgomery255
    @alexmontgomery255 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    If there’s going to be a nuclear war I’m glad that A: I’m an old man and B: I live a millisecond away from a major military installation.

    • @owenbradford9746
      @owenbradford9746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Might not be the best thing

    • @seanmg-_-1138
      @seanmg-_-1138 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@owenbradford9746 option one: die instantly and painlessly
      Option two: live in a nuclear destroyed planet. Absolute chaos, barely any livable resources, radiation everywhere, people who are left fight each other for survival over the smallest things you take for granted today.
      I’ll take option one.

    • @drinkswatere
      @drinkswatere 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seanmg-_-1138from what I’ve heard it would be the northern hemisphere that would deal with the nuclear fallout. Southern wouldn’t be too bad. So if you can get down south you might be able to live okay. That’s just what I’ve heard but idk.

    • @gabrielsidani7038
      @gabrielsidani7038 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@drinkswatere i live in the south hemisphere and i dont want this shitshow!!

    • @ViburaBlanca
      @ViburaBlanca 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Option B isn’t even that good

  • @RaceCarFriends
    @RaceCarFriends 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +234

    Imagine if humans were actually focused on peace.

    • @nicholaslennon
      @nicholaslennon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      Imagine if we focused on nuclear power production as hard as we have nuclear weapon production. We would have achieved nuclear fusion power by now.

    • @bakedcookiezzz
      @bakedcookiezzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quit saying this, the US is trying to get peace but other nations want to take control under their ruling n ideology’s, n The other countries just wants to nuke the US in general 👁️👄👁️

    • @bakedcookiezzz
      @bakedcookiezzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nato is the closest thing we have for peace!, haven’t seen Europe in war for 75 years until “Russians” decided to rule a “special military operation” which is basically their invading phrase

    • @bakedcookiezzz
      @bakedcookiezzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the US never conducted a special military operation Mexico while the cartels are destroying our country with drug smuggling the US doesn’t even want War, we need the force to keep us safe from invaders

    • @alexkukhtevych3056
      @alexkukhtevych3056 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@nicholaslennon it's already there since December 2022

  • @johnstephanos1128
    @johnstephanos1128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There's no chance that the US or Russia would engage in a nuclear war due to the harmful impact it would have on people and the environment. Despite possessing thousands of nuclear weapons, they could only safely use a small portion of them. This is because nuclear blasts would lead to a drop in global temperature, caused by burning cities and soot blocking sunlight. This would result in food shortages and a severely damaged atmosphere. In the event of multiple nuclear strikes, cities would burn, and the resulting smoke would block sunlight for decades, leading to worldwide food shortages and starvation.

    • @letsplaywar
      @letsplaywar 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      While traditional agriculture heavily relies on sunlight for photosynthesis, there are alternative methods for food production that do not require direct sunlight. Indoor farming techniques such as hydroponics, aquaponics, and vertical farming can be implemented in controlled environments like underground bunkers or buildings with artificial lighting. These methods allow for the cultivation of various crops without relying on natural sunlight. Additionally, efforts to develop lab-grown or synthetic food products are ongoing, which could provide alternative sources of nutrition in post-nuclear scenarios.

  • @patrick4857
    @patrick4857 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Holy shit, you have very accurate information!

  • @RoySATX
    @RoySATX 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    As someone who grew up during the cold war many of the comments are terrifying. When I was young no one ever said a nuclear war might be a positive thing, ever. We had respect for the tragedy that would be.We put value in life. All life including human. No one who had any love of this planet and the life on it ever suggested the world would be better off after a nuclear war, no one. What is in the minds of today's youth that they would conclude a nuclear war would reduce the human population therefore the Earth would be better off? If the Earth would fare better with fewer people then maybe it's these homicidal sociopaths who should leave first.

    • @seanmg-_-1138
      @seanmg-_-1138 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I mean the world would be better off with less people. But not caused in a situation like this that’s just nuts. Maybe by limiting the number of children you can have. The planet is way overpopulated and it’s still growing. What’s gonna happen when we bleed this planet and it’s resources dry? Something is gonna happen eventually that’s going to be devastating to humanity either caused by us or by our lack of change/actions we didn’t take.

    • @mike6335
      @mike6335 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Birth rates in the US have been in massive decline since the 70’s. Many countries including the US are at a negative birth rate. Last I looked the US is right below 2 births per woman.
      China is under extreme pressure because of their old birth policy. Last I checked They were at a 3 child policy because their replacement rates were not sustainable.
      These are just two examples of many. It’s a common misunderstanding that is repeated.

    • @owensthilaire8189
      @owensthilaire8189 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Actually the modern era of nuclear weapons technology and application is a lot less destructive in the long term with regards to fall out.
      The powers the be have spent a lot of time and money figuring out ways to make a nuclear war " do-able".
      Unfortunately.

    • @LegendaryCollektor
      @LegendaryCollektor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Cope boomer

    • @northpeace
      @northpeace 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Come on lets have a cook-off Sodom versus the Eastern Kingdoms

  • @rickythegreat1
    @rickythegreat1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I've never been so terrified of KSP b-roll

    • @Joyce_Aneila
      @Joyce_Aneila 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I see sr2/jno

  • @DEATH-THE-GOAT
    @DEATH-THE-GOAT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Literally, Oppenheimer's quote comes to life
    _"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”_

  • @MrGoogleChill
    @MrGoogleChill หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think we would win a "nukyalur war" but nobody wins a "nuclear war"

    • @barrysilvertone2896
      @barrysilvertone2896 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      google the dead hand system, the whole US would be a giant crater before the first missile hits russia lol

    • @nikita-fm7ij
      @nikita-fm7ij 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@barrysilvertone2896Pretty sure the system works by using different systems to determine whether there was a nuclear attack which depends on the detonations occuring first before it can make the order to retaliate. A kind of back up Incase the government gets taken out before a response can be ordered. That's just what I heard though, I don't work in the Kremlin.

  • @HPG45
    @HPG45 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    You just combined the last three videos, which granted are great, but that "To Be Continued" part about an attack on the US, we're jonesing for it lol.

    • @borghorsa1902
      @borghorsa1902 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russian channel, account and building are registered to FSB in Moscow

    • @jeffspicoli5399
      @jeffspicoli5399 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@borghorsa1902 Yeah so what ... We still want to see it.

    • @R-UBBERD-UCK
      @R-UBBERD-UCK 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@borghorsa1902proof?

    • @paultorbert6929
      @paultorbert6929 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It doesn’t matter….. The Russian hardware is so flawed and poorly maintained, most of their nuclear devices will detonate in their own country……

    • @hydra70
      @hydra70 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@borghorsa1902 Seeing as youtube accounts aren't registered to locations at all, I'm really curious how you know that this account is registered to the FSB in Moscow.

  • @Damaged7
    @Damaged7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    You should have shown all of the attacks back to back, or as you would believe they would happen, all together at the end to really show the scale of what the entire attack would be like.

    • @julian_david4556
      @julian_david4556 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he does around 5 minutes

  • @pier-oliviermarquis3006
    @pier-oliviermarquis3006 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Can we get the source of the soundtrack? Looking for the track at 16:00.

    • @thekwispytoastman
      @thekwispytoastman หลายเดือนก่อน

      Following - I would like the info too

  • @live_your_best_life_now
    @live_your_best_life_now 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks well done

  • @JoeJoe-to3ed
    @JoeJoe-to3ed 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Overwhelmingly and sadly sickening. That we can end life just like that. This is horrifying. Murder to it's fullest. It actually made me cry for any nation.

    • @jaygatsby5013
      @jaygatsby5013 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      War has been around since the dawn of man, death hasn’t changed

    • @93PinkShawty
      @93PinkShawty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jaygatsby5013nah really wow. It’s still disgusting.

    • @august4215
      @august4215 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Correct you cant just do it like that russians would retaliate and we would get exact same thing.

    • @aaz1992
      @aaz1992 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The clowns and freaks in charge love this stuff

  • @machack95
    @machack95 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Its daunting to imagine that a large chunk of the worlds population could be gone within an hour of the first launch 😮

    • @voodoovince8001
      @voodoovince8001 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      That is why it is believed that ww3 would last at minimum an hour as all nuclear powers glassed each other.

    • @WatchFelineSpine
      @WatchFelineSpine 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😦

    • @cjnicholl8559
      @cjnicholl8559 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@voodoovince8001minimum an hour or maximum? Serious question lol

    • @warlordgg6585
      @warlordgg6585 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Чувак, 300 млн это не половина населения 🤣

    • @TheNotSoOrdinaryCarGuy
      @TheNotSoOrdinaryCarGuy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s scary but perhaps this is the worlds way of population control. It knows our flaws will lead us to eventually wiping out virtually all of ourselves and after nuclear winter, the earth will start anew. ???? Just a thought. 😂

  • @googleadmin2
    @googleadmin2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i only feel sorry for all the innocent animals and plants that would go extinct
    ....not so much for humanity, who doesnt deserve to live on this beautiful planet!

  • @roin.1999
    @roin.1999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The fact is that results like this would be in Hollywood movies. 😂

  • @_example
    @_example 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The production here is just incredible. Bravo!

  • @pythonjosh361
    @pythonjosh361 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    My quota of how many times I hear "Nucular" in a day has been exceeded.

  • @PoesHill
    @PoesHill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Knowledge is power.
    And power is having enough knowledge to know that you will never have enough power.
    Poe Baron

  • @MrBundemall
    @MrBundemall 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please release part 2 😢 🙏

  • @flippopotamuss
    @flippopotamuss 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    You did a phenomenal job with this sir. Well done!

  • @scorchstorm588
    @scorchstorm588 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    This has to be one of the best videos I have ever seen! Not to mention it’s also one of the most informative! This is great! I can’t wait for part 2!

    • @frankp7411
      @frankp7411 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They left off the part about America having civil war 2

    • @MM-tw7pu
      @MM-tw7pu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frankp7411Russians would still retaliate nuking the hell outta the US. The civil war in what was once America happens in the Mad Max era to follow for mainly food, drinkable water, and women 😅

    • @frankp7411
      @frankp7411 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MM-tw7pu perhaps if America's satanic leaders in Washington hit the button before losing control, but otherwise Russia would likely be close allies and supporters of the rebels, even if that did happen

    • @alicorn3924
      @alicorn3924 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@frankp7411what?

    • @nathanielracine
      @nathanielracine 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Part 2 is the death of the world

  • @exposingunjust
    @exposingunjust 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And I’ll never forget it. I see one of those submarines on first Avenue by the FDR.

  • @jonathonvince561
    @jonathonvince561 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This all assumes that satalights wouldn't be knocked out first and all of these guidance systems would still work. Noone truely knows what the other happens to have until its too late.

    • @reverands571
      @reverands571 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Missiles use inertial guidence, not GPS.

  • @TR-zx1lc
    @TR-zx1lc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    39:00 You mixed up Bulgaria and Hungary. Early on you also mixed up the locations of North Dakota and Montana. Minor issues. Excellent work though.

    • @gneshvdev
      @gneshvdev 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s the indication of this presentation is prepared by Chinese. Go figure!

  • @MA-db1el
    @MA-db1el 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Amazing depth and breadth of information- my new favorite channel!

  • @KaiserPanzerM42
    @KaiserPanzerM42 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    18:43-19:05 Listened to this part on repeat countless times.

  • @williambrennan104
    @williambrennan104 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wouldn't a disadvantage of the subs be that it's easier to disrupt communication with them?

  • @roywood9683
    @roywood9683 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    there is NO winner in an exchange of weapons like this. life on planet would end.

  • @RayMosier
    @RayMosier 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

    The amount of information. And the delivery. Amazing. Well done. Excellent content.

    • @RENOWN55CHARGE
      @RENOWN55CHARGE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuke-u-lar

    • @stevensowards8077
      @stevensowards8077 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      To much info they need to shut up

    • @tyantisamuels9461
      @tyantisamuels9461 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah helping the enemy. You people are weird

    • @stevensowards8077
      @stevensowards8077 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@tyantisamuels9461 my thoughts exactly 💯

    • @shaunobrien6425
      @shaunobrien6425 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevensowards8077 You think this person who found all this info about nukes online has more info then our adversaries who have the same internet access and a lot of other resources?

  • @Ballox
    @Ballox หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where is part 2

  • @tedebayer1
    @tedebayer1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ever wonder why they put all those silo's through the plains as opposed to northern Alaska? Wouldn't it be a much shorter distance to travel, and make the first-strike target area well outside the continental heartland? This would also be a lot less missiles to try to sort out-intercept as they head toward military bases and population centers as well, should it elevate to that point.

  • @charliefrancis6438
    @charliefrancis6438 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This should be required viewing for anyone going into politics or the military

  • @Whatisright
    @Whatisright 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    Watched a few videos breaking down a nuclear exchange. None mentioned what kind of cyber warfare would take place to slow down or cut off early warnings or alerts. Wonder if in such a situation there’s even time to engage in anything like that.

    • @whitehorse4318
      @whitehorse4318 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      The United States military has satellites that have the capability to neutralize both ICBMs and enemy satellites.
      Why destroy enemy satellites, satellites is what guides ICBMs. Secondly, when the "Star Wars" program was proposed. America has satellites with nuclear payloads. When any of our enemies launches a ICBM at us, our satellites will incept incoming ICBMs in high Earth orbit.
      The United States currently has 3400 satellites orbiting earth.
      China comes in second with 550 and Russia only has 170.

    • @1968.5
      @1968.5 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@whitehorse4318 space will be extinguished first

    • @whitehorse4318
      @whitehorse4318 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@1968.5 I totally agree with you. Then what will guide your missiles?

    • @1968.5
      @1968.5 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@whitehorse4318 well, we've already seen it. Who are you listening to? Now there are too many experts. What he didn't mention about early warning stations. They see over 6000 km. The United States will not be able to shoot and forget.

    • @TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA
      @TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia has a contengiceny for that called dead hand, that in the case it was destroyed its nuclear weapons would auto deploy. Its a kill switch if russian command doesnt not respond to this system x amount of times per day it will start a launch

  • @betraid
    @betraid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's time to move to live in Australia, grabbing a chair and popcorn waiting till the show getting started

  • @bryoncooley5156
    @bryoncooley5156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    By not having one...when it comes down to it nobody wins, just a bunch people that have never met each other nor even have a problem with, killing each other because their government tells em too, sad part is that if we met alot of the people off the battle field, we'd probably get along just fine...Afghanistan and WW1 and 2 were about some of the only justifiable wars but even then, there really was no winners,

  • @caspa7
    @caspa7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The music, the braaaa, the drama, the flamboyant yet apocalyptic voice over… perfection.

  • @Think503
    @Think503 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I feel like if you showed this to a top general during the Cold War the would imprison you for espionage

    • @ltmundy1164
      @ltmundy1164 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How can I know that the orders I receive to launch my missiles came from a sane president?
      - Major Harold L Hering USAF

  • @MoratoryBasil
    @MoratoryBasil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the random clips of Kerbal Space Program

  • @darewin1300
    @darewin1300 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Sub'd great explanation

  • @richardseager6065
    @richardseager6065 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Imagine trying to organise this madness within the hour or so of it taking place, even with decades of planning it would be a giant shitshow of disorganised panic. The worst day in history.

  • @denimdan908
    @denimdan908 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I wouldn't know whether or not nuclear missiles are kept there, but I live about 45 minutes West of Whiteman Air Force Base outside Warrensburg, MO. That's where the majority of the stealth bombers are kept. I work in Warrensburg and if you pay attention you'll see the stealths flying around the area almost every day. Could only imagine how many were mistaken as UFOs till they became public knowledge...

  • @ChrisSmith-lo2kp
    @ChrisSmith-lo2kp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i believe it was machiavelli in the prince who said that democracies always have better weapons because of the free market incentive and enforceable contracts to produce stuff that actually works

  • @jeffwako77
    @jeffwako77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this must have been hard work,good job dude👍👍👍👍

  • @Condor1970
    @Condor1970 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    At 8:15, it's public knowledge that the Trident II carries up to 14 warheads each. Usually only 10 per treaty, and 4 decoys, with up to 24 missiles per ship.
    That's 240 warheads per ship, and 14 submarines, providing a total of up to 3,360 MIRV's in the fleet.

    • @joshuaortiz2031
      @joshuaortiz2031 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought we stopped using MIRVs on our submarine based missiles. I might not be remembering that right tho

    • @Ricardo-kh7fb
      @Ricardo-kh7fb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@joshuaortiz2031 yes! Of course! We don't have any MIRVs in our submarines -wink wink

    • @joshuaortiz2031
      @joshuaortiz2031 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ricardo-kh7fb that makes a lot more sense

    • @ericmcmanus5179
      @ericmcmanus5179 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was thinking the same thing.

    • @starmnsixty1209
      @starmnsixty1209 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And the Moon is made of cheese. Green cheese at that.

  • @karenskowronski1580
    @karenskowronski1580 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    I have a feeling this information might be old. I can’t imagine our military leaking precise US nuclear sites so easily. We must have bigger and badder things in place.

    • @brandonbowerstx
      @brandonbowerstx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      800+ kps NEFP weapons coming in from high orbit.

    • @RangerB66
      @RangerB66 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are an open society with a free press; this information is not classified, google 'nuclear posture review 2023', you'll see every single bit of info down to the last detail.
      It doesn't need to be secret; in fact it's better that others know, that way there's no, "oops, I didn't know they had those weapons, I'd have never tried to attack if I knew that."
      As long as the sites are protected and the systems continuously tested for reliability, it's not a problem.

    • @dcred123
      @dcred123 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the wonder of Mutually Assured Destruction. They know where our nukes are. We know where theirs' are. We both know what they can do.

    • @bomjahed
      @bomjahed 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@brandonbowerstx if only these were real lol

    • @mnemonicpie
      @mnemonicpie 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your military industrial complex is a laundering scheme for decades now, honey

  • @mitchdaytonam3
    @mitchdaytonam3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your split of one MIRV Bus is far too generous. A Trident can’t drop its MIRVs over an area as wide as some of your depictions show.

  • @jamjardj1974
    @jamjardj1974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Staggering to think these weapons have been with us for 79 years.