This Is How A Nuclear Bomb Works

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2022
  • Tune in to find out how a nuclear bomb works 💣
    Suggest a topic here to be turned into a video: bit.ly/2kwqhuh
    Subscribe for more! ► goo.gl/pgcoq1 ◄
    Stay updated ► goo.gl/JyGcTt goo.gl/5c8dzr ◄
    For copyright queries or general inquiries please get in touch: hello@beamazed.com
    Legal Stuff.
    Unless otherwise created by BeAmazed, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com/sDha7AGa

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @MTWood
    @MTWood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5016

    BTW: The Trinity test bomb was detonated from a platform. Not dropped from a plane. Just sayin’.

    • @billmeade9029
      @billmeade9029 2 ปีที่แล้ว +255

      I caught that also and was going to comment that but I figured someone else would have 👍

    • @dictatorofthecheese
      @dictatorofthecheese 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Did it before I could say the same thing. Lol

    • @ProperLogicalDebate
      @ProperLogicalDebate 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      I had my suspicions and hearing this makes me wonder how much anti-bomb propaganda there will be.
      I also wonder what people will think of my choice of words.

    • @lancerevell5979
      @lancerevell5979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      From wiki.....
      "The Gadget was hoisted to the top of a 100-foot (30 m) steel tower. The height would give a better indication of how the weapon would behave when dropped from a bomber, as detonation in the air would maximize the amount of energy applied directly to the target (as the explosion expanded in a spherical shape) and would generate less nuclear fallout. The tower stood on four legs that went 20 feet (6.1 m) into the ground, with concrete footings."

    • @markclowe
      @markclowe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

      Thanks. I began reading comments for that reason. I knew someone would mention that. It's a very basic fact and calls into question everything else, sadly.

  • @leanrobert9809
    @leanrobert9809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3451

    Respect to that one man who experienced both bombings and still lived to tell the tale.

    • @thepros5151
      @thepros5151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +219

      Yes one Japanese guys survived both Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing, to know more about him just check in infographics show

    • @paulraymond9886
      @paulraymond9886 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Proof it is a hoax....

    • @savage6230
      @savage6230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Anyone saw jelly the TH-camr 5:07

    • @coolguy-wd5vo
      @coolguy-wd5vo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@savage6230 yea

    • @ozymandiasnullifidian5590
      @ozymandiasnullifidian5590 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @@paulraymond9886 What is a hoax? That some people survived both bombings, or that there were nuclear bombings? When the bomb destroyed Hiroshima, what do you think were the closest cities where those who survived or who were injured or sick went? Have you seen on a map how close Hiroshima and Nagasaki are? Who knows how many went or were sent to Nagasaki, so it is very possible that quite a few survived both blasts.

  • @westernmist2808
    @westernmist2808 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +354

    Nuclear engineer here: Gadget (the device exploded in the Trinity Test) wasn’t dropped from a plane, but left on a 100-foot tower and detonated. Scientists at the time where concerned that the detonation might be dangerous to any plane overhead, so they made sure to not put any pilots at risk. Also, the Trinity Site is open to the public twice a year (perfectly safe - exposure is less than half that from an airplane flight).

    • @laz288
      @laz288 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      I was about to say something about it also. Yes this channel should do better fact checking. The Jumbo Bomb weighed 214 tons and a B29 had a 10 ton capacity so there was no aircraft that could even drop that bomb. They used it instead 800 yards from ground zero and it remained intact after the gadget explosion. Wonder how many other videos on You Tube are misleading.

    • @user-tz2zz5ij1s
      @user-tz2zz5ij1s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      You don’t even have to be a nuclear engineer to know this. It’s well documented in unclassified documents.

    • @bobjones304
      @bobjones304 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yep was thinking the same. Less than 3 mins into the video and already multiple things are simply incorrect.

    • @josemiguelojedallerandi9409
      @josemiguelojedallerandi9409 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      That's also how its depicted on the film Oppenheimer

    • @joegamingdud1576
      @joegamingdud1576 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      shut up you watched opennheimer thats the only reason

  • @MrLulu520
    @MrLulu520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    fun fact: the reason nukes make mushroom clouds when they explode is that, because of the shock wave, all of the debris and smoke can only go one direction: up. so, when it goes up, it moves so fast that it not only breaks the sound barrier, but begins to roll into itself because what is on top has lost all momentum and is still being pushed inward from the shock wave. this creates the iconic nuke mushroom cloud effect.

    • @davidtatum8682
      @davidtatum8682 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Any explosion with sufficient yield makes a mushroom cloud. It's not exclusive to nukes.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Understood.

  • @chevtruck1000
    @chevtruck1000 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    The Trinity test was conducted from a tower. Not dropped from an airplane.

    • @wieczor3000
      @wieczor3000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Yes. And power was 18.6 kilotons not 1

    • @nomos_lol
      @nomos_lol 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It is simple and well documented history. I wonder how this detail could not have been caught up in editing or the initial writing for script of this video.

    • @seaturtledog
      @seaturtledog 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nomos_lol It would have been much more risky dropping it from a plane for the pilots and people arounf the area if they missed. The photograph used of the first bomb seems fake as the bomb looks way too big.

    • @michaelbailey4164
      @michaelbailey4164 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seaturtledog That picture is the containment vessel. If the bomb turned out to be a dud it would be placed into the containment vessel called Jumbo.

  • @rhysmodica2892
    @rhysmodica2892 ปีที่แล้ว +405

    For the record, the Trinity test was NOT dropped from an airplane, and the 'Jumbo' container (designed to catch any leftover plutonium in the event of a fizzle) was never used. The bomb (which was of the implosion design) was placed into a tower and detonated there. The gun assembly system as used in 'Little Boy' was not tested first as it was believed to be fool proof (placing two sub-critical parts together to make it critical is somewhat simpler than compressing a smaller sub-critical mass).

    • @rhysmodica2892
      @rhysmodica2892 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Furthermore, it is worth expressing that little boy didn't strictly use compression to set the bomb off. Because the Uranium can never be 100% pure, some other isotopes remained (I can't remember which). These isotopes undergo spontaneous fission meaning that if you assemble enough material in one place, it's bound to go off. Trouble is that this is far from efficient. Compressing a mass and increasing density of plutonium creates a similar but far more efficient design. It is also safer as the material is completely safe unless it is detonated, whereas the gun system could theoretically go off under gravity if something went wrong. Fusion bombs will use the X-rays (in a way that is still rather secret) to remove electrons around styrofoam in order to create a plasma with the heat and pressure required (yes radiation pressure) required to fuse isotopes of hydrogen (deuterium and tritium of which tritium is created on the spot through a reaction with lithium which is also secret as to its workings) together. Once fused, they create even more neutrons that will result in further fission, creating further fusion and this cycle with grow exponentially. Whilst the largest fission bomb was about 500kt, there is no limit to a fusion weapon. The Teller Ulam design was the big game changer.

    • @kanesailor
      @kanesailor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      thank you for putting the correct info in. its an important part of the american history that should be rembered

    • @NLYS27
      @NLYS27 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We were told that the Jumbo was made as a back up incase the bomb couldnt go critical for a explosion. Its extremely thick and very heavy. The walls are 4- 6 inches thick.

    • @heathmcrigsby
      @heathmcrigsby 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I thought I was taking crazy pills when he said it was dropped from a plane lol

    • @rhysmodica2892
      @rhysmodica2892 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@kanesailor I'm glad I could be off help. I'm from the UK but history is important to me and I've been studying nuclear stuff and the cold War independently to make sure I'm up to speed. Nuclear weapons are hard enough to understand without errors in history thrown into the mix. BTW if you wish to put these bangs into perspective, I really recommend nukemap.

  • @StonerWatchproductions
    @StonerWatchproductions 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    i just saw Oppenheimer at the theaters and the Trinity Test WAS NOT DROPPED FROM A PLANE

  • @scottdakadescot4127
    @scottdakadescot4127 ปีที่แล้ว +440

    Huge respect to that Soviet Navy officer who prevented the launch of ballistic missiles aboard his submarine.

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      I agree with your opinion of Mikhail Arkhipov, but it was a nuclear torpedo they didn't release.

    • @MrTerrrrible
      @MrTerrrrible 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FAKE

    • @gerardribafernandez3671
      @gerardribafernandez3671 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      he is a hero

    • @danouthousemouse
      @danouthousemouse 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The hunt for red October was loosely based on this fact

    • @florantesoriano8737
      @florantesoriano8737 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Is anybody correct if I say not fair for the japanese people civilians are not combatants,why is it ..??😊

  • @rexisnox577
    @rexisnox577 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Quick correction, Hirohito wanted to surrender even before the nukes but the warhawks in his parliment stood their ground, it was only after second that hirohito used the powers that he technically had but never used to overule parliment. 3:49

    • @den264
      @den264 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Correct ! His military heads were for fighting until every Japanese perished. When the Emperor recorded his acquisition speech accepting all the terms the allies promoted, a crazed major in his army organized a mutinous force to overthrow the existing government and take hold of the two recordings. Fortunately they failed and the recordings were played over all of Japanese held territories. Unfortunately because the Emperor spoke in a higher class Japanese toung fewer than ten percent of the population understood.

    • @cheesyfries7703
      @cheesyfries7703 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. No one man should get the blame for this.

    • @Exolotl_0
      @Exolotl_0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They cut the telephone lines!oh great!like they could EVEN surrender! Innocent lives also!they didn’t ask to die !mosters.absolute monsters

    • @americaforever
      @americaforever 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Tojo and his war party were out by 1944. The Japanese had tried to discuss surrender thru the Soviets as intermediates 6 moths before the end of the war. The Soviets never passed the word on to the allies. In short a Japan wasn’t allowed to surrender till the bombs were dropped.

  • @TBNRNikola99
    @TBNRNikola99 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well....we're on several FBI watch lists.....👍

    • @blackhammer5797
      @blackhammer5797 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My “How to make Counterfeit Money” search already got me there

    • @KalienKeides
      @KalienKeides 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not unless we can get that uranium 235....

  • @jasmineprathibha4022
    @jasmineprathibha4022 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    imagine Oppenheimer never stoped making atomic bombs

  • @danny_boi3537
    @danny_boi3537 ปีที่แล้ว +1026

    The terrifying part about the Tsar Bomba was that it was detonated at *half* of its possible power.
    It was capable of delivering a 100-megaton explosion, while they only detonated it at 50 megatons.

    • @xiaohanzhao5120
      @xiaohanzhao5120 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      😨😨😨

    • @danny_boi3537
      @danny_boi3537 ปีที่แล้ว +140

      The good news is that the Soviet Union decided that an explosion that large wasn't practical, so no one has had a warhead like that since then

    • @KingstonTiger
      @KingstonTiger ปีที่แล้ว +79

      @@danny_boi3537 They still has two of them in their garage.

    • @williamvn2928
      @williamvn2928 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the US, Russia or even China has a few of those weapons as that scale or much more powerful in their storages.

    • @RandomFunnyGamer
      @RandomFunnyGamer ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah no wayyyy

  • @blackfang04
    @blackfang04 ปีที่แล้ว +615

    Great way to explain fusion and fission! I had no idea how nuclear weapons actually worked but you laid it out in a really easy-to-understand way.

    • @nuclearpotato6616
      @nuclearpotato6616 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please do not believe him, he got his info off a website that poorly says anything true.

    • @critterfestsanctuary2446
      @critterfestsanctuary2446 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Why do I have a feeling your in your garage building one right now. If so can I help lol.

    • @yungbozz8820
      @yungbozz8820 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@critterfestsanctuary2446 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 lol like seriously

    • @nonamenoname7468
      @nonamenoname7468 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      b e n

    • @iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
      @iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Worry about Iran.

  • @RankSarpac
    @RankSarpac 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I had gotten a lot of this, but your explanation of radioactive decay was very well illustrated and finally clicked being able to visualize that for me. Great explanation.

  • @Kingbimmy
    @Kingbimmy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I knew a decent amount about how nuclear fission and fusion work but this made it much clearer in my mind, thank you 🙏

  • @HeatSGamingXD
    @HeatSGamingXD ปีที่แล้ว +20

    5:10 Did anyone notice Jelly in his green jelly hoodie doing a 'nope' gesture during the UN resolution on calling of A-bombs? Those who did, leave a like here.

    • @Pulsar300
      @Pulsar300 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah i saw that by the way im a fan of him

    • @anthonyr3941
      @anthonyr3941 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here but I'm more of a slogo fan

    • @Pulsar300
      @Pulsar300 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anthonyr3941 yeah ok

    • @Pulsar300
      @Pulsar300 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anthonyr3941 im a fan of jelly cuz he is more funnier

    • @bay6031
      @bay6031 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea

  • @tonyhall3845
    @tonyhall3845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    I met a gentleman 95 years old. he lives in Ransomville, NY. he said he was the last surviving member of the Army unit that was at the Trinity Blast. very nice man, and very smart

    • @rjampiolo32
      @rjampiolo32 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      you should try to interview him, it would be priveless.

    • @COSMIC_SECRET
      @COSMIC_SECRET ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You should ask before sharing personal info like that

    • @tonyhall3845
      @tonyhall3845 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@COSMIC_SECRET i did, MYOB

    • @AngelosGT
      @AngelosGT ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone back from when America was not full of idiots yet🤣

    • @JMoroccoMisterBoy
      @JMoroccoMisterBoy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tonyhall3845 TKs. much.

  • @AndyBonesSynthPro
    @AndyBonesSynthPro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    2 things- the "giant bottle" thing in that photo was not the atomic test device, it was a container they almost used as a casing that the device would be detonated inside, in hopes that if it did not work properly, they would be able to collect & reuse the plutonium that, in the event of a fizzle, would be scattered inside. The device itself was much smaller, spherical and covered in cables that would set off the inner mosaic-like sphere of explosive lenses surrounding the fissile core. They ended up abandoning the idea of the container 2, here's the big one: the Trinity device was not dropped from a plane, it was detonated atop a 100ft. metal tower. This was so all the cameras & sensors would precisely capture the whole process from a controlled area

  • @casperghost1467
    @casperghost1467 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Who’s here after watching Oppenheimer?

    • @mutusinkala3922
      @mutusinkala3922 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Me

    • @dr.shing3504
      @dr.shing3504 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Not me, I’m here because of a famous dinosaur that ate a bomb, might’ve heard of him.

    • @jamiegz6425
      @jamiegz6425 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🙋🏻‍♀️

    • @mrandrew1243
      @mrandrew1243 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Strangely enough I'm here after watching coronation street 🤪

    • @hero4035
      @hero4035 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@dr.shing3504 lizard

  • @paolapaz1486
    @paolapaz1486 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    the trinity test was actually located at an isolated desert NEAR soccoro, mexico called “jornada del muerto”. the bomb was nicknamed, “the gadget” and the bomb was actually detonated on top of a 100 foot tower.

    • @simon_777
      @simon_777 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well that's incorrect. It was actually in Los Alamos, New México and the bomb was codenamed: Trinity.

    • @LouisRonald3000
      @LouisRonald3000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@simon_777 it was in Los Alamos, the test name was Trinity and the bomb name was "The Gadget"

    • @TheEdwinduarte
      @TheEdwinduarte 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@simon_777 nah nah los alamos was the place where the object was designed, the zero point wasn't los alamos she was right.

    • @TheEdwinduarte
      @TheEdwinduarte 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@LouisRonald3000 nah nah los alamos was the place where the object was designed, the zero point wasn't los alamos she was right.

    • @simon_777
      @simon_777 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheEdwinduarte I see what happened there was a misunderstanding because none of us explained well. The test was indeed in New Mexico but near Mexico. They are right the name is indeed "Gadget"

  • @gsmithy8517
    @gsmithy8517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    This video is loaded with errors….
    1). The Trinity test (first bomb at Alamogordo) was detonated from a 100 ft high tower, not dropped from an airplane
    2) The strength of the first successful US thermonuclear explosion was codenamed Mike at 10.4 MT (not 15 MT)
    3). The yield of the Tsar Bomba was 50 MT not 57 MT
    4) You said that by 1980 the nuclear test countries (other than US / USSR) were Britain, France & China. In fact it was more. Britain (1952), France (1960), China (1964) and INDIA (1974). Shortly afterwards it was Pakistan (1983) and much later North Korea in 2006.
    Shortly after that, I sort of gave up….. Sorry.

    • @spidermight8054
      @spidermight8054 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Exactly! Common knowledge, and easily obtained knowledge.

    • @modyusa1
      @modyusa1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Video has a lot of historical mistakes

    • @johnwalczak9202
      @johnwalczak9202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      exactly, I stopped watching after he said that Trinity was dropped from a plane. Sloppy research - or no research at all

    • @Marsalien100
      @Marsalien100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also the US made the first nuke with the help of German Scientists.

    • @romaniangypsy3640
      @romaniangypsy3640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      50-58mt

  • @josephconnole4222
    @josephconnole4222 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As stated elsewhere, Trinity Test was a platform test, not an aerial test. There were planes airborne over the test site to measure the impact from the sky. The bomb released 25 kilotons of energy, not 1 like the video claims.

  • @MasterofGalaxies4628
    @MasterofGalaxies4628 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As they said in War Games: "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

  • @TrLHW
    @TrLHW 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    This is super interesting. The area my family lived in was hit by the radioactive rain after the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and alot of them died from cancer, there is still a lot to learn about how radiation effects people. nuclear power is not something to toy around with.

    • @kennethkho7165
      @kennethkho7165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I agree, but a lot lot lot more people died from cancer caused by radioactive materials from coal power.

    • @willow3168
      @willow3168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If someone takes in just the right amount of radiation they can die but not for because we all know that cells regularly die and then more cells come in but sometimes the cells that make new cells can all die and u slowly get more and more dead it sound weird but it’s true

    • @lavinialadlass9432
      @lavinialadlass9432 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m sorry to hear that about your family.

    • @CookingwithAdam833
      @CookingwithAdam833 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Facts facts facts facts facts facts facts facts facts facts facts facts

    • @CookingwithAdam833
      @CookingwithAdam833 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry for what happened to your parents hopefully thy are in heaven

  • @jaytalley3715
    @jaytalley3715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +202

    My dad was born in Carazozo NM. He and my grandparents were contaminated by the radio active drift. They ALL had thyroid issues and cancer. A lot of Native Americans were caught up in the radiation as well. When they set off that first bomb they didn't know for sure what was going to happen. There are a lot of victims of the bomb. Many of them right here in the States.

    • @tonyhall3845
      @tonyhall3845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      that's true, they were not sure what was going to happen. some thought the bomb would blow up most of the world's oxygen.

    • @ryanmozert
      @ryanmozert ปีที่แล้ว +2

      they get $

    • @ryanmozert
      @ryanmozert ปีที่แล้ว +3

      or?

    • @jaytalley3715
      @jaytalley3715 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ryanmozert No they/we don't get compensation from the effects of that bomb. Victims of bomb contamination in Nevada, DO get considerable compensation though.

    • @ryanmozert
      @ryanmozert ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jaytalley3715 why nevada

  • @HellsCaretaker
    @HellsCaretaker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The difference between war crimes, mass murder and heroism is always determined by the victor.

  • @miguel-xe1dh
    @miguel-xe1dh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fact:a man in hiroshima survived the explosion from "little boy" and went to his home town,nagasaki,until it was nuked,he survived,he was both lucky and unlucky

  • @Voidy_g
    @Voidy_g ปีที่แล้ว +169

    Fun fact: The tsar bomba was deliberately detonated at only half of its full capacity. That shot you saw was taken over 300 miles from the actual blast site edit: why is this getting so many likes

    • @johnsmith143.
      @johnsmith143. ปีที่แล้ว +3

      bingo

    • @mrbubbarosa
      @mrbubbarosa ปีที่แล้ว +41

      they did that to save the flight crew. The plane would never have survive a full 100mt blast. it barely survived a 52mt blast

    • @voidz7611
      @voidz7611 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      but what will the flight crew do with the 100mt bomb? the are developing the 100mt 'poseidon' bomb.

    • @roblohub
      @roblohub ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@voidz7611 that was years ago today we have new technology so the planes will prob be faster

    • @rajveerkanojiya2985
      @rajveerkanojiya2985 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@roblohub today there are maybe more advanced weapons than this nukes is it possible

  • @maxiandrews8424
    @maxiandrews8424 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    My dad was a UN peace keeper in the new zealand army , taking medical supply's two weeks after the first A bomb went off , the way he had described what he had seen there two weeks after the bombing of hiroshima gave him nightmare's for the rest of his life , which drove him to drink a lot of alcohol , he used to wake up screaming in the middle of the night , My dad was never the same after he come home , he didn't come home alone , he bought something back with that also killed my brother , my brother died of leukaemia at the age of 18yrs old . trust me guys we don't want to use these weapons . life is short enough . the world only gets one chance to get it right , And we're only going to get it wrong one time only.

    • @irustv7674
      @irustv7674 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sad but 65% commentators and 80% politicals dont think so ..

    • @debbielwilliamson8546
      @debbielwilliamson8546 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I'm so sorry for your heartache.
      I agree. No more of these horrible actions.
      World leaders must use their brains and leave their egos at the door.

    • @massimoricciardi6202
      @massimoricciardi6202 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@debbielwilliamson8546 Problem we got assholes in North Korea to deal with and Iran .

    • @lopamudraray4571
      @lopamudraray4571 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      My heart goes out to you. No words to console you for your loss. I worked 6 years with oncologists. Seen much suffering of these cancer patients.

    • @lopamudraray4571
      @lopamudraray4571 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Politicians don't care.

  • @Mikeabq1
    @Mikeabq1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also, not Socorro. Many miles southeast of there. Not dropped. Detonated from a tower.

  • @mrfeather2732
    @mrfeather2732 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    you forgot to mention that the Tsar bomba was reduced by 50% so the crew can escape. the actual bomb was suppose to be twice as powerful lol.

  • @ro4eva
    @ro4eva ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Making such a trivial error as claiming Trinity was dropped from a bomber -- it was actually detonated on a platform -- is amazing.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Points out that the rest of the video may be equally as unreliable...

  • @benjypineapple2570
    @benjypineapple2570 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I love how someone discovered a way to create a lot of energy FIRST thought how can we use it as a weapon

    • @facelessandnameless
      @facelessandnameless 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The world was at war. It’s not surprising.

  • @kastellan1324
    @kastellan1324 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Many historians say the bombings did not lead to the Japanese surrender, and the Soviet declaration of war on Japan two days later was a bigger shock. It put an end to any hope the Soviets would negotiate a favourable surrender for Japan

  • @webstartergurus4463
    @webstartergurus4463 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for this simple explanation of fusion and fission atomic bomb.. hasn't understand this stuff since high school ..

  • @addisonlippold1852
    @addisonlippold1852 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    he was like: "hey here's how a nuke works." and TH-cam was completely okay with it, yet TH-cam will copyright strike a stream when the streamer walks by a coffee shop playing a copyrighted song.

    • @bigstuff52
      @bigstuff52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Addison..There is a ton of technical behind what they're saying that most people wouldn't understand it anyway

    • @brucekamps6970
      @brucekamps6970 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TH-cam doesn't mind missinformation.

    • @rajveerkanojiya2985
      @rajveerkanojiya2985 ปีที่แล้ว

      what really who's the streamer 🙂

  • @thearmyflyer4905
    @thearmyflyer4905 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The bomb at Trinity was not dropped from a plane, it was atop a 100 foot steel tower. Been there, very interesting place

  • @erikt1713
    @erikt1713 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The most impressive image contains a common error of magnitude. At 7:30 we see a Tsar bomb that is 5 times higher, wider and deeper than the 10 MT bomb. It is labelled with 57 MT. However, the energy would have to be about 1250 MT to match this representation, i.e. an error of more than factor 20. A 57 MT bomb should have a cloud that is "only" 78% bigger in each of the three dimensions.

  • @jonathondelemos4609
    @jonathondelemos4609 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Feynman wrote he (Nobel Laureate) watched an atomic bomb explode without any apparent safety precautions. People saw these things in real time. Not just the Japanese survivors were the only spectators

  • @jacobthomason2428
    @jacobthomason2428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The first nuclear test was The Gadget, it wasn’t dropped from a plane. It was tested from atop a tower. Also, it wasn’t in the city of Socorro. Just Socorro County. The Trinity test sight is closer to Alamogordo or Bingham. Currently in White Sands MR, you can visit the site a few times a year and see the obelisk erected in 1965.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez ปีที่แล้ว

      Trinity is closer to Socorro than Alamagordo. Trinity is about 37 miles from Socorro and about 58 miles from Alamagordo in straight lines. Bingham is about 12 miles. Bingham consists of 1-2 houses, and at that time (1945), was a general store and trading post.

  • @mr.duanesharpe
    @mr.duanesharpe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    A great man once said:
    “It’s easy to destroy but hard to build!”
    Point: imagine if humans dedicated all this to health and space travel!?!?

    • @TheRealWaffles1
      @TheRealWaffles1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      This was the worst take ive ever seen

    • @blu-rae864
      @blu-rae864 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They do

    • @dennisny6439
      @dennisny6439 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Space travel doesn't add any tangible value to the human race. You should have said things like poverty eradication, environment conservation, fresh food supply, better education, health technologies, living standards improvement etc

    • @sauravrathi2799
      @sauravrathi2799 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheRealWaffles1 nah you are just being mean

    • @lazmo4941
      @lazmo4941 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sauravrathi2799 he is right.

  • @mervyfaith4876
    @mervyfaith4876 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for explaining how lethal these monstrous weapons are

  • @TroyWajda
    @TroyWajda ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Enjoyable account of our brief history into nuclear weapons. Overall well done. A couple of things I would like to clarify, though overall probably not the most important:
    Trinity Test: The device wasn't quite a bomb in it's final form. It was a contraption that was piecemealed together and literally in some places held together with tape. It was not dropped from an airplane, but instead was lifted via wench to the top of a tower and detonated.
    Tsar Bomba: was originally designed and created to be 100 MT, however due to it's absolute assurance that no pilot could survive dropping the bomb they then lowered it's payload to only be 50 MT.
    When you talk about diseases you can get from acute radiation you say "leukemia or cancers". Leukemia is cancer. It would be like if I told you, "You can have a honeycrisp or an apple."

    • @charlesdayon8420
      @charlesdayon8420 ปีที่แล้ว

      Virgin Mary appeared in Necedah, Wisconsin and said that Leukemia was not cancer but a completely different disease. She also said the method of curing cancer that was condemned and is now practiced in Tijuana, Mexico is a effective cure for cancer.
      Hail Mary full of grace the lord is with thee, Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus, Holy Mary Mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen. O'my Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy mercy. Amen

    • @jcsbronx1846
      @jcsbronx1846 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In addition, it was NOT dropped from a plane, it was perched on a tower. How did this get passed everyone who worked on it???

    • @captaincat1743
      @captaincat1743 ปีที่แล้ว

      good points, you're right on all of them, as far as cancers go, leukaemia is pretty unique because it is not localized, it is spread throughout the whole body from day one, as I'm sure you know. I have often heard of it categorized apart from other forms of cancer in medical texts.

    • @mattricks1334
      @mattricks1334 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice fairytale Charles

    • @gregcoste5332
      @gregcoste5332 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jcsbronx1846 yes the Trinty bomb was a gadget (not a bomb) and was detonated on top of a tower, NOT dropped from an airplane!

  • @wm.tomlinson1434
    @wm.tomlinson1434 2 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Dude, get your history straight. The "Trinity" bomb was set on a tower, NOT dropped from a plane. Also, it was based in Los Alamos, not NY

    • @mark-kg7wg
      @mark-kg7wg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Good catches but not everything he got wrong .. Einstein sent a letter to the president too ..etc

    • @MilesTippett
      @MilesTippett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Also Trinity was detonated in Alamogordo New Mexico, not Socorro.

    • @isaiahoconnor8236
      @isaiahoconnor8236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! You beat me to it!

    • @pjduker05
      @pjduker05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that. And somebody else said they're using this for a school project, well somebody is getting an F in the history portion of their project.

    • @milopepper2559
      @milopepper2559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And as for innocent people? Every member of the Japanese society was part of the military by order of the Emperor! That included children, in fact at this time children in Japan were being trained to clutch a mine roll under a US tank and push the detonator!

  • @awjb3
    @awjb3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    also, the scientist that created the Tzar Bomba, was originally going to make it twice it's big, but realized that most of the blast would just escape into space, so resolved to leave it at around half the size.

    • @betatest5789
      @betatest5789 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ohhh he was worried about it going to space? Not at all caring about what might be the consequence on humans and animals? What a psycho

    • @realbruh850
      @realbruh850 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@betatest5789 well US was the first one to test a nuclear warhead

    • @jamjardj1974
      @jamjardj1974 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It wasn’t engineered that way. Technically it fizzled.

  • @jaimemulligan4096
    @jaimemulligan4096 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Manhattan project they figured out a way to split the atom, then put radioactive stuff into the bomb like uranium all that stuff, and that creates a huge explosion

  • @Dr.M.VincentCurley
    @Dr.M.VincentCurley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Okay, so you need to edit this video. Not sure where you got your information:
    1) Trinity had to be detonated from scaffolding, for obvious reasons. No bomber/plane was used.
    2) Trinity was in the "neighborhood" of 25 kilotons of yield.
    3) U-235 is the only fissionable isotope of Uranium, and it only makes up less than 1% of all Uranium ore. Thus the need for large centrifuges. As most of Uranium is U-238.
    4) "Purification" of isotopes of Plutonium (man made element) are required for a uniform fission explosion. Although technically, almost any of the isotopes could be used.
    5) Hydrogen is typically "fused" to He (Helium) but fusion also is required for other elemental formation. All the way up to Fe (Iron if I'm not mistaken).
    6) Since at the time, Hydrogen was the only element we believed we could "fuse", hydrogen isotopes such as deuterium (2) and Tritium (3) were used.
    7) The location of the United States during world war II was CRITICAL in the development of the "Atomic" bomb as more than 30 different locations within the United States and Canada were used to develop the fissionable material and other components. If any of these sites were to have been "bombed" then the setback would have cost the development team. This is a big reason why Germany never had a chance.
    8) The introduction of Fusion to the atomic bomb made it so that the actual destructive power of "nuclear" weapons was "limitless".
    9) The amount of radiation caused by Fusion bombs/aka Thermonuclear devices, is exponential compared to that of fission weapons such as little boy and fat man. Both cities in Japan have been re-inhabited, however the Bikini atoll islands in the Pacific remain uninhabitable to this day.
    10) The "Doomsday" device that has been theorized consists of a 5-7 stage cobolt salted fusion device that takes advantage of ever expanding/increasing heat. The myth follows that such a device has been developed in secret near the American seaboard and could be housed in a warehouse building without detection. This device, if detonated would destroy most if not all of the eastern coast of the United States if they were to launch a pre-emptive strike.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No centrifuges were used to separate U235 from U238 during the Manhattan Project. The separation was done at Oak Ridge using gaseous diffusion, thermal diffusion, and calutrons (cyclotrons made specifically to separate uranium). Centrifuges could not be built at that time that would work as the technology (such as air bearings) had not been developed.

  • @SMELLGOODER
    @SMELLGOODER 2 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    Even though most informed adults - world wide - realize that nuclear weapons are unimaginably destructive, I really don't think that they KNOW, just what kind of awful, horrific, catastrophic atrocities that a nuclear war would entail. Literally, there aren't enough adjectives to describe the result. You made a valiant effort with this video, and I appreciate the content. I really do. But I hope, for mankind's sake, that no one will EVER find out. 👍🇺🇲🌎🌏🌍✌️

    • @phildillard4298
      @phildillard4298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Nuclear winter would destroy humans if the fire didn’t kill em first.

    • @SMELLGOODER
      @SMELLGOODER 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@phildillard4298 undoubtedly true.

    • @liquidacid1983
      @liquidacid1983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phildillard4298 You would literally need to mine and weaponize every single bit of uranium on the planet then detonate it all at once to come close to causing a real nuclear winter. There have been hundreds of studies that did out the math.

    • @phildillard4298
      @phildillard4298 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In a US/Russia nuclear war situation nuclear winter would happen. That’s at least what google said. It wouldn’t be like the ice age if that’s what you are saying…

    • @FREEDOMGUNNER
      @FREEDOMGUNNER 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only one adjective needed. ANNIHILATION!

  • @biggiesmalls7939
    @biggiesmalls7939 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2:00 - 2:09 all of that information is incorrect. The "gadget" from the Trinity Test had an estimated yield of about 19 kilotons. It was also hoisted up on a 100 foot tower and detonated remotely. The picture shown at 2:01 wasn't the bomb. That was an encasing they wanted to put the bomb in, in case it didn't achieve nuclear fission. They decided not to go with this, due to the HIGH amount of fragmentation it would've produced. It would've sent radioactive material for tens of miles across the desert.

  • @Alumni6042
    @Alumni6042 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes the trinity test was fired from a tower. I think the 1 kilo ton yield confusion was that prior to the test shot of the nuclear weapon, they fired a test of 1,000lb of dynamite.

  • @johno9507
    @johno9507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:11 The Trinity bomb wasn't dropped from a aircraft, it was detonated from the top of a 100 foot tower.

  • @AyuuuuuSannnnn
    @AyuuuuuSannnnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Nuclear Bombs are truly scary. The quote, "I have become death, Destroyer of Worlds" is so true.
    Love the video, by the way. Keep it up.

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're right. It's a far higher class of utterance than "One step for a man..." which I've concluded was scripted by a committee far less educated and well-read than Oppenheimer.

  • @konradgehrer4659
    @konradgehrer4659 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Manhattan project didnt take place in Manhattan. They worked in Los Alamos

  • @Evan_Bell
    @Evan_Bell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    1:56 The trinity test did not yield 1 kiloton, it yielded 24.8 (+-2) kilotons.
    The device shown isn't a weapon, it's Jumbo, a device meant to contain the weapon if it failed. It was never used.
    The Trinity device wasn't dropped from a plane, it was detonated atop a tower.
    Sometimes I'm baffled by where TH-camrs get their information from. Even Wikipedia gets these details right.
    Why's the primary at 7:40 edited to appear like its glowing green?
    18:40 several thousand pounds of conventional explosive wasn't detonated in little boy, just 8lbs of cordite.
    18:52 The uranium wasn't compressed to any meaningful degree. A change in density of the fuel isn't what initiated the reaction.
    19:25 more powerful gun type weapons have been produced. The Mk-8 and Mk-11, for example.

    • @TheClumsyFairy
      @TheClumsyFairy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, that got me pretty mad too, like how on earth do you get it that wrong, it's almost like they deliberately put BS in their videos to get mugs like us to comment.

    • @jamesthreadgill7651
      @jamesthreadgill7651 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This video should be removed as "fake" media.

  • @williamfong5427
    @williamfong5427 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Hey, wait a minute. You say the first atomic bomb was a prototype dropped from a plane. But all the history books, Wikipedia and videos say it was detonated atop a steel tower -- which was vaporized in the explosion. What the !! ?? How can you make such a howler of a mistake in military technological history? Who wrote this script?

    • @bomcstoots1
      @bomcstoots1 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was dropped from a plane

    • @user-vm3ie6ft9g
      @user-vm3ie6ft9g 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bomcstoots1nope, it was not.

  • @krombopulusdave
    @krombopulusdave 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Y'all ought to check your facts. The trinity test was not dropped from an airplane, but a tall steel tower in Alamogordo, NM. And the Department of Energy states that the destructive power was just under 19 kilotons, not one kiloton. Other than that, great video!

  • @michaelkantner6420
    @michaelkantner6420 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First off, the first atomic test in America, was not air dropped, it was a device suspended from a tower, and that test was called "Trinity"

  • @russellcarson4207
    @russellcarson4207 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There is a feature-length documentary film that would go well as a companion piece to this one. The title is "Trinity and beyond: The atomic bomb movie." There is not a lot of humor in it, but it still presents technical information in a format that isn't too hard to understand. And, like this short documentary, it starts with the Trinity shot. And yes, the nuke wasn't dropped. It was on top of a tower when it was detonated. The next two were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. After that the USA, and a few years later, the USSR, were setting these things off like fireworks in a variety of places - including the sea, high in the atmosphere, underground (and not just in Nevada), and space. One of the most interesting test shots was that of the US Army's "Atomic Cannon." It was a rather large piece of artillery, though not nearly as big as some freaky big guns the Germans used in World War One and Two. Of course it didn't have to be. It used conventional explosives to fire a shell that weighed, I think, around 750 pounds, and when it detonated seven miles downrange it yielded a 15 kiloton blast. That was the first and last time it was fired, even though a few more were built and equipped with nuclear ammo, and deployed. The history of this weapon gets a bit foggy after that. The guns and their shells were retired after a few years. This was in the 1950s. The rapid development of guided missiles, whether launched on land, at sea, or in the air made it obsolete even before it fired that first shot. I found a copy of the movie on DVD at our local library. It's probably available on a streaming site, maybe even TH-cam. I only had to see it once. I'm 79 years old, and thus part of the "duck and cover" generation. During the wild, wild period of nuclear testing we saw movies about it in school, watched them on television, and read about them in newspapers and magazines. Fun at the time, if you weren't too close to the tests. Not fun if you were.

  • @ishyy416
    @ishyy416 2 ปีที่แล้ว +438

    WOW! I am literally doing a project on nuclear power and this was exactly what I needed! You explained every detail very well. Thank you very much! :D

    • @isablame1263
      @isablame1263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Nuclear power is definitely powerful yet it is hard to get rid of the waste. It is non renewable..

    • @rodger3641
      @rodger3641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@isablame1263 They use sulphuric acid to slurp the urainum from below, they drill a hole into the uranium, send down the acid at a pH of 1, then suck it back up, just hope it doesn't get into the water table....

    • @gvndual84
      @gvndual84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      There’s just one problem (so far): the video is wrong. 2:00 The first bomb was not dropped from an aircraft, it was perched at the top of a tower. And the site is not still radioactive.

    • @Evan_Bell
      @Evan_Bell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@gvndual84 Also it didn't yield a kiloton. The site is radioactive. Everywhere on Earth is radioactive.

    • @Evan_Bell
      @Evan_Bell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Some things you should know about nuclear energy. It has the lowest carbon intensity of any source. Causes the fewest deaths, uses least amount of resources and least land area per unit energy produced of any source. It also has the highest capacity factor of any source.

  • @0xHiromasa
    @0xHiromasa 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Who's here after oppenheimer

  • @lawrencedarmawan3164
    @lawrencedarmawan3164 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dont feel bad for the soviet pilot who dropped the bomb feel bad for the scientists who made the bomb.

  • @willhindereeds2590
    @willhindereeds2590 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Otto Hahn technically didn’t figure that out, he performed the experiments but I’m pretty sure that Lise Meitner was the physicist who actually figured out what was happening

  • @sandradelaney8827
    @sandradelaney8827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +313

    Thank you for explaining how nuclear fission and fusion work, as well as the difference between atomic and thermonuclear explosions. This was the only time that I’ve been able to understand it. My husband will be so impressed!

    • @i_love_anarchy
      @i_love_anarchy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      can you dumb this down it hurt my brain

    • @jajatikeshariswain9533
      @jajatikeshariswain9533 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did u see jelly 5:08

    • @kennethkho7165
      @kennethkho7165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@i_love_anarchy fission: splitting uraniums; fusion: merging hydrogens.

    • @onlyWASABI
      @onlyWASABI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sadly this video has A LOT of wrong information in it so maybe quote your husband something else, because this video is a joke!

    • @PucciAttainsHeaven
      @PucciAttainsHeaven 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@onlyWASABI it’s not meant for actual lessons, it’s there for entertainment

  • @vinniedixon1140
    @vinniedixon1140 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tsar Bomba was small to what the Russians were capable of creating. If that 57mt hydrogen bomb had included a uranium-238 tamper, the yield of the explosion would have been in excess of 100mt.

  • @TheNOCUZZY
    @TheNOCUZZY 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shlawg did not do his research.
    1: Trinity was not dropped from a bomb.
    2: Truman did not order the bombing of Nagasaki, he ordered the bombing of Kokura, but due to whether and smoke, they couldn't find the target so they went for Nagasaki.
    3:the Japanese surrendered because the Soviets declared war on them.

  • @Morachnyion
    @Morachnyion ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The first bomb. Known as the gadget, was on a platform. Not dropped

  • @michaeltheoret8913
    @michaeltheoret8913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Trinity Device was actually staged upon a metal tower and detonated . It was not dropped from a plane. The first time an atomic bomb was dropped by plane was on Hiroshima on 6 August 1945.

    • @Tzunamii777
      @Tzunamii777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's nuts they would get this so wrong. Perhaps it was intern night when they researched and approved this.

  • @tanmaypalkar9861
    @tanmaypalkar9861 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's one value packed video, thank you.

  • @bryancunningham5071
    @bryancunningham5071 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The Trinity test was a tower shot of around 21 kilo tonnes and not the one kiloton airdrop that you have misleadingly stated. With regards to the second attack, Nagasaki was the secondary target after poor visibility spared the primary target Kokura. Running low on fuel, the fat man weapon was dropped around 3 maybe 4 miles from the intended target landing near the hills to the northeast and resulting in less damage even though the weapon was nearly 50% more powerful than the little boy weapon which had flattened Hiroshima. This is still regarded as a war crime by many outside of the United States. Many believe that this second attack brought the Second world war to an end. This is only partly true, as when the Soviet Union ended their neutrality with the Japanese empire and declared war and then invaded Manchuria with plans to take the Northern island of Hokkaido, the high command could see that the military situation was now impossibly hopeless. They were holding out for a conditional surrender to the allies in which they may keep the emperor Hirohito in place. This was accepted by the US administration although they still called it the unconditional surrender of the Japanese empire.

    • @mayankchauhan7558
      @mayankchauhan7558 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine developing an atomic bomb but miscalculating the fuel consumption 💀 tbh allied were so hypocrites and always doing war crimes. Nazis bombed london by mistake and regarding colonialism by japan& Germans, what is up with british colonies where they treat other nations people aa their slaves and forcing them to fight for them?

    • @medore13
      @medore13 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. It seems more like "common knowledge" than a myth that only the 2 bombs ended WW2... but the Soviet Union was very important here

    • @danknoll4657
      @danknoll4657 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      25KT. Was larger than Nagasaki by 4KT.

  • @gregorytobin5754
    @gregorytobin5754 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The "bomb" we see at around 1:50 is actually a giant metal casing that was going to be place around the Trinity bomb called "jumbo". The idea was to place the bomb inside it to catch any of the nuclear material incase the bomb didn't work.
    But then someone suggested that if the bomb did work, and it was encased in a giant metal cylinder - it would become the world's largest frag grenade. So they decided not to use it.
    It was blown up years later, and the remains of it can be seen near the Trinity bomb test site today.

  • @WhatABangerYT
    @WhatABangerYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ah yes, thank you for explaining how to build a hydrogen bomb.

  • @michaelsowden5892
    @michaelsowden5892 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Already mentioned several times it wasn’t dropped.
    But it also was not dropped over Socorro NM. It detonated on a tower about 60 miles north of White Sands NM.

  • @John-eh6jg
    @John-eh6jg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Thank you for breaking these videos down simple enough for someone like myself. Scary to think about especially with everyone on edge these days . Great video nonetheless

    • @dako5005
      @dako5005 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The video is wrong on many things. If you want legit info on how those work you should watch some other video because this one has A LOT of errors and straight up BS out of thin air.

    • @user-tz2zz5ij1s
      @user-tz2zz5ij1s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dako5005you aren’t going to learn how a nuclear weapon works by watching any video…. You need to know physics and chemistry to even remotely understand. And to do that you’d need college classes, engineering core physics and chemistry, and then advanced nuclear specific classes. There is no video to “check out”.

    • @psychomormon4932
      @psychomormon4932 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol. This video is full of misinformation starting with the “dropping the Trinity bomb from a plane”, lol.

  • @bosoxno201
    @bosoxno201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    The mind it took to discover and weaponize Nuclear fission/fusion is terrifying

    • @Sonofwill
      @Sonofwill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Llp

    • @Bennahr_Fett
      @Bennahr_Fett ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LORD.. I know right?

    • @hoot1141
      @hoot1141 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not really. The concept is very simple. The problem needed an engineering solution. It’s not really terrifying at all. Nuclear fission is the energy of the universe.

    • @bdasaw
      @bdasaw ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The dude that discovered nuclear energy prolly died of radiation poisoning.......

    • @ptribbs1
      @ptribbs1 ปีที่แล้ว

      The mind it took to be a Nazi or side with one is considerably more terrifying.

  • @cypsrp7924
    @cypsrp7924 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also, nuclear power is not 100% environmentally friendly. There's always the used up fissionable material that has to be disposed of (ie. buried until it's radiation reaches a half life safe enough for exposure (read: 100s of years)). But, of course, IF CONTAINED, nuclear power is great.

  • @dinorocker8647
    @dinorocker8647 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "And Hirohito still refused to surrender." Seriously, did this guy ever watch Last Samurai and Emperor, in those films we found out the Emperors of Japan were just figurehead leaders without any real power, the Prime Ministers were really the ones with the power, Hideki Tojo was the real bad guy in WW2 in the Pacific, of course we rightly dealt with him after WW2 ended.

  • @yourweeklydoseofbadcontent2156
    @yourweeklydoseofbadcontent2156 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Dude be here teaching us how to make a nuke

    • @James-ef5hi
      @James-ef5hi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fr tho 😂😂😂

    • @jendoi
      @jendoi ปีที่แล้ว

      20 years from now, we would be seeing DYI nuke videos..

    • @Blueesteel_
      @Blueesteel_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No he didn’t… he explained how it works. Very different things.

    • @TerriazeCAPCUTeditor
      @TerriazeCAPCUTeditor ปีที่แล้ว

      >:)

    • @isaacsdreamyworld9093
      @isaacsdreamyworld9093 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Blueesteel_ killjoy

  • @Xehemoth
    @Xehemoth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Imagine surviving Hiroshima and trying to explain what happened to people in Nagasaki just moments before the second bomb went off. Not exactly the time you want to say "Hey look! I told you so! we are about to be vaporized!"

    • @uplinktruck
      @uplinktruck ปีที่แล้ว +7

      There were several hundred who experienced that very scenario. The Japanese have a name for people who managed to get hit twice. Alas, it's been too many years since I heard the term and cannot remember what it was.

    • @stepfraser8375
      @stepfraser8375 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@uplinktruck As I recall,in Japanese they were termed "Shitoutalucka"

    • @fandroid6491
      @fandroid6491 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stepfraser8375 "Shitotalucka"? Wait, isn't the correct term "hibakusha" or (Japanese: 被爆者 or 被曝者; lit. "person affected by a bomb" or "person affected by exposure [to radioactivity]"). If that was sarcasm, feel free to r/woooosh me 💀

    • @DoggosGames
      @DoggosGames ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fandroid6491 It's referring satirically to "sh* out of luck"

    • @Xehemoth
      @Xehemoth ปีที่แล้ว

      @Idris Ali I am not reading any of that nonsense.

  • @zigml
    @zigml 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Britain's first atomic bomb was detonated on 3 October 1952. The mud-laden cauliflower explosion. Britain developed its own atom bomb to remain a great power and avoid complete dependence on the United States, which was refusing to share atomic information

  • @taotzu1339
    @taotzu1339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indiana Jones survived a nuclear blast by hiding in a refrigerator. Shows you how tough GE refrigerators are and why they don't seem to degrade in junk yards.

  • @luckyedwards4870
    @luckyedwards4870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Wow, I'm very surprised to hear u promoting nuclear energy. It's definitely a good thing when done properly, and thusly it's good that u show that. Absolute thumbs up.

    • @Aquesius
      @Aquesius 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Unless you use it the "fun" way

    • @oofman1911
      @oofman1911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Aquesius 😁

    • @stmon12
      @stmon12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nuclear energy is the ultimate green energy.

    • @austinb1824
      @austinb1824 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thumbs down on the comment 🤮

    • @Aquesius
      @Aquesius 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@austinb1824 oh wow its not like your overreacting

  • @royd209
    @royd209 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    it is said that the tsar bomba lost half it's destructive capability after the lead scientist behind the project feared that at it's full potential, the bomb could irreversibly damage the planet

    • @UnyahPe1601
      @UnyahPe1601 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      YES, The World need's 10,000 Tsar Bomba to Destroy 8billion plus of Dinosaurs on this Planet, VERY2 GOOD IDEA. Let's Build them!!! 👍👍👍💖💝🥳🥰🤩😍🤩😂🤣

    • @pedroks7756
      @pedroks7756 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@UnyahPe1601 what?

    • @rajveerkanojiya2985
      @rajveerkanojiya2985 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UnyahPe1601 they have more technology than that

    • @fandroid6491
      @fandroid6491 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UnyahPe1601 No, let's nuke the corrupt political figures instead

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 ปีที่แล้ว

      *_Not true_* He was perfectly well aware that its blast would crash the bomber.

  • @mrillis9259
    @mrillis9259 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember the Platoon director breaking down the timeline, and it showed that between the bombings and the surrender that it was the Soviet victorys in the east that lead to the surrender.

  • @souvikbose1627
    @souvikbose1627 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sorry but the "splitting" of the U nucleus and the fact that the mass loss observed during fission is converted to energy was explained for the first time by Lise Meitner!!

    • @eloquentlyemma
      @eloquentlyemma 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought that was Ernest Rutherford - a New Zealand scientist working at Cambridge University in England in about 1911 (not sure if the date is correct though).

    • @souvikbose1627
      @souvikbose1627 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eloquentlyemma No, Rutherford, in 1911, discovered the alpha particle and established the fact that an atom is mostly empty with about >99% mass concentrated in its "center" which was termed as the nucleus (consisting of protons and neutrons) and the rest consists of electrons. What I am referring to is what happened during Otto Han's era and the experiment that concerned Han in this video. This is sometime around early 1940s. Lise Meitner was exiled from Nazi Germany (she used to work with Otto Han) and Han used to collaborate with her through letters. And it was during this time Lise Meitner was able to explain the mass loss when U was bombarded with neutrons.

  • @Daralyndk
    @Daralyndk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    It should also be noted that standard ICBM (Intercontinental Balistic Missile) which is what most people would imagine under "a nuke" can carry up to 12 or so MIRVs with idependent payloads that can pepper the target area with nukes like carpet bomb...so the number of active misiles greatly underrestimate the destructive potential
    You're welcome

    • @Aatell764
      @Aatell764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep the consensus was done that a single giant nuclear warhead is less effective at destroying a large target like a city then multiple smaller warheads spread out across the entire metropolitan area.

    • @rickm6076
      @rickm6076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But they don’t. Neither Russian nor American land based missiles are fully loaded anymore, and neither are sub-based missiles, though they are closer to fully loaded

    • @Daralyndk
      @Daralyndk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rickm6076 true, and theyyare not extremely precise either, but if you hit the dense urban area, or close to it... you don't need them to be fully loaded anyway. Each of those payload is in and on itself stronger than bombs dropen on Japan back in the day
      And you know what they say
      Near hit is enough in shells... and nuclear weapons

    • @rickm6076
      @rickm6076 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If Russia launched a first strike right now they have to spend most of their warheads trying to get minutemen missiles, and then certain high value air bases (Eppley in Omaha, and Whiteman in Missouri) and sub bases, namely Kings Bay in Georgia and Bangor in Washington.

    • @neogenmatrix6162
      @neogenmatrix6162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Trident missiles SLBM's carry 14 mirv warheads while minuteman III ICBM's can carry up to 3.

  • @im2kul74
    @im2kul74 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Great explanation that doesn't require a lot of scientific understanding of how fission and fusion works. Thanks!

    • @mikemann1960
      @mikemann1960 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Imagine what they are doing at C.E.R.N..

    • @phavan3360
      @phavan3360 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mikemann19608 HCG ZAA

  • @RiseAtlantis
    @RiseAtlantis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It makes me think what Cern is doing particle smashing to possibly create a black hole or blow the whole world up

  • @user-mq3wy1dy9k
    @user-mq3wy1dy9k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Now I am become death. Destroyer of worlds”. - Julius Robert Oppenheimer

  • @demonwalker01
    @demonwalker01 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    It wasn’t the Japanese emperor that refused to surrender it was the military command. It was unheard of for the emperor to go around the military like he did to surrender and the leadership tried to kill him to stop him from doing it. Also Tsar Bombba’s core was reduced by half at the last second. It could have been at least twice as strong or more.

    • @jman4083
      @jman4083 ปีที่แล้ว

      Screw the Japanese ruler. He was a mad man hell bent on dominating most of Asia or all of it and the Pacific ocean islands. I think many lives would of been saved if he was taken out of power.

    • @rhysmodica2892
      @rhysmodica2892 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What they did was remove the Uranium tamper which would double yield at the expense of tremendous fallout. Instead they used lead which produced almost no fallout whatsoever.

  • @misak_ying8127
    @misak_ying8127 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I think it’s really evil how they kept testing the bomb without having any care for the environmental or human lives :(

  • @905Metalhead
    @905Metalhead 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Trinity wasn’t dropped from a plane, and the site is safe to visit today, open to the public twice a year.

  • @harrycarrey5124
    @harrycarrey5124 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    for the record the Trinity bomb as not dropped from a B 29 it was dropped from a hot air balloon so it could stay aloft and film the mushroom cloud .

  • @jjthejetplane11
    @jjthejetplane11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    BTW: the Bockscar was actually ordered to drop Fat Man on Kokura. The plane was re-routed due to bad weather and smoke. So the bomb was dropped on Nagasaki instead.

  • @4everhealthwellness344
    @4everhealthwellness344 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    So hard to believe that just 20 pounds of matter can make an explosion powerful enough to destroy a large city

    • @alazkaalazka6087
      @alazkaalazka6087 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s so horrifically Absurd you can’t even comprehend it

    • @Sixstringman
      @Sixstringman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And that's at a 1% rate of matter to energy conversion

  • @fjg2896
    @fjg2896 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Correction at 15:58. Hydrogen atoms are neutral, not positively charged. The nuclei are positive, as mentioned.

  • @cmconley33
    @cmconley33 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is interesting is that Tsar Bomba was deliberately scaled back by half by its designer: it could have been equivalent to greater than 100 MT of TNT if they had used the designed load of deuterium. Ironically, the Soviets were worried about the very same thing some of the American designers of the bomb were worried about: an unstoppable chain fusion reaction of the gases in Earth’s atmosphere, which would have burnt Earth to charcoal.
    And just like J. Robert Oppenheimer was eventually persecuted by the U.S. government in part for advocating against the design of more powerful bombs, the Russian designer of Tsar Bomba was persecuted by the Soviet authorities for advocating the same thing.

  • @vizardman135
    @vizardman135 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thanks! I was so curious how that all worked and you explained it perfectly!

    • @spondoolie6450
      @spondoolie6450 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I, too, was wondering what would happen if I ate a bunch of curry.

    • @nuclearpotato6616
      @nuclearpotato6616 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry Vizard he did not explain a lot of it correctly he got his info of a poor quality website where the dev's just put in random numbers.

    • @chrisconley8583
      @chrisconley8583 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except this video has mistakes and is more opinion than fact or history.
      It’s credibility being lost starts at the “Trinity Test”. The bomb didn’t detonate from being dropped from a plane, they built a tower.
      It’s narration about Cold War you can tell is told by someone that wasn’t alive during it because it moralizes the way things are now and totally discounts how things really were at the time.

  • @ybloc1428
    @ybloc1428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I think there's a bit of context missing. Leading up to the dropping of the bomb on Japan, any time Americans won over several islands not only the Japanese soldiers would kill themselves out of shame because they believed their leader was a god but the mother's would walk themselves and their children off cliffs. Hence when the leader asked for soldiers to fly camacazi planes and they'd "be rewarded in the after-life". If American soldiers were to take over by land and their leader never gave up, anyone in that believe would be dead even if they never fought themselves which was everyonein that culture. By using the bomb, it scared the leader because nobody knew how much we had or what else we could do and by surrendering himself the people then saw it was ok to surrender themselves and that he was no more than a human himself. Yes it was a horrifying invention, but it was also used in a horrifying time.

    • @MrMash-mh9dy
      @MrMash-mh9dy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Japanese culture itself was why they did surrender after the bombs dropped. They were all willing to die for their country....but none were ready to die without fighting first. The martyr is not a new concept by any means or exclusive to any one religion or country. To not even fight before death would be the most dishonorable way to die for a Japanese citizen and with the power of the A-bombs, the realization of there would be no fighting on the home soil, only massacres from above made the Emporer finally relent.
      The disgrace and extreme dishonor of disobeying the emperor's will were what made them follow so blindly. Honor was everything in traditional Japanese culture. Dishonor was a fate worse than death. And there are no gods in Shintoism, only deities. He was considered a living deity, which is not quite the same thing as being a god. It's more in line with Roman mythology than Christian mythology. The Roman Emperor was seen as the closest man in the empire to the gods...but he was not considered a god. A few Roman emperors even tried and they were all pretty quickly assassinated afterward. The Memento Mori was a reminder as well as a warning given in one breath.

    • @Aatell764
      @Aatell764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah way back in highschool we had to do an essay about whether or not the bombings were justified, I always thought they were. Japan wouldn't have given up and more then likely an entirely new war between the US and Japan would have raged on with insane amounts of casualties on both sides.

    • @swaggychicken.
      @swaggychicken. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Aatell764 but that doesn't justify the efectx of nukes still expericanced and civvilains dont deserve to die for political reasons so this is not just

    • @Aatell764
      @Aatell764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@swaggychicken. The citizens would have battled to the death if a full invasion would have happened, so they would have died in the millions. Besides the effects of nuclear radiation wasnt well understood at the time. It was the second and third nuclear bomb ever dropped and the only ones where humans were actually directly affected by the blast.

    • @swaggychicken.
      @swaggychicken. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Aatell764 but still no justification

  • @julianbentham3989
    @julianbentham3989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    really good, understandable explanation of how nuclear weapons work.

  • @ibrahimadamu5178
    @ibrahimadamu5178 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks man
    I really learned Alot