“It wasn’t there to witness the activation of Aluber” lmao that sounds so funny. Imagine from a perspective Fenrir is like “aye, I heard you added something illegal when I wasn’t around. You gotta go son” Aluber: “Naw fam, you weren’t even here, how do you know that?” Fenrir: “damn, yous right. Go on.”
Not a fan of the ruling that we apply to Kashmir Shangri-La in being unable to reclaim zones. There are new Firewall/Cyberse cards coming out of Cyberstorm Access, and those cards are not good enough. Now they're gonna get beaten up more by such a ruling.
These videos are absolute gold, thanks for making them, Tom! Hopefully you'll make one for Bystial as there's plenty of interesting interactions with them that might get confusing.
Are the Kashtira monsters effects that say "when your opponent activates a monster effect, you can do this" able to be used on the opponents turn, or are they only able to use their effects on your own turn since it does not say quick effect?
Interested to learn why Fenrir wouldn't see Aluber activating its effect and able to cause its trigger effect in a new chain when summoned as chain link 2, but exosisters can activate Vadis in response to you using d.d. crow to move a card from the grave but the summoned sisters will see that banish and be able to activate their trigger effects in a new chain
That's because Fenrir and the Exosisters have completely different activation triggers. Fenrir only activates when it "sees" a monster activate, which it will miss if you chain to the monster effect and summon. Exosisters, on the other hand, activate when they "see" a card move out of the graveyard, which hasn't happened yet if you chain Vadis to D.D. Crow. A better example would be trying to chain Vadis to the graveyard effect of an Eldlich trap since the Exosisters would also not be able to activate since they wouldn't have been on the field to "see" the card move.
@@Ryuujin721 I see it's because the d.d. crow hasn't resolved yet causing the card to be banished before the exosisters hit the board where in Fenrir's case the monster has already been activated.
Rulingquestion: if I activate dinomischus targeting a face down card my opponent controls, we then realize it has to target a face up card do i have to retarget a legal target if ther is any or can I set it face down? Can someone also send me a lik to an example on the database, i couldnt find something similar
in regards to the question with imperm and preparations if I was to activate preparations with a kashtira monster on field and my opponent chains infinite impermanence (the opposite order than the question) would I be able to activate the effect to banish from hand in a new chain?
I have problems in MD: I have the Kashtira monster(s) already face up since my turn, my Preparations already activated since the opponents standby phase, and the opponent activates cards and effects, but nothing happens with his hand. Any idea about that?
In the hand viewing ruling it says "opponent may gain an advantage". However in this case, the duelist who caused the damaged game state is the one gaining an adventage. Not the opponent :/
i dont believe you can look at the hand with the second example, it says controll a kashtira on field by time the effect of a trap is activated, not resolved. they activated imperm (so the condition was met for activation) and there was no kashtira on the field
Unfortunately, u are incorrect in this. Controlling a Kashtira, only needs to be there by the time of activation. This particular ruling is in the ocg data base and listed specifically. Consider each trigger point as a separate condition, and not one you must simultaneously meet. Firstly, it's a trigger like effect, so it is going to happen in the next chain, like most trigger effects, it needs to meet conditions. Your opponent has to use a trap card/effect, this is something that happens in the previous chain and is restricted to that timing. If you control a Kashtira monsters, a Kashtira just needs to be there at the time the trigger can activate. This card was already face up, really indicating this effect cannot be an activated trap card further indicating this is a trigger like. Typically the condition of " if you control X monster," it just needs to be there at time of activation normally for triggers and ignitions.
Why does the Kashtira Cards Start a New chain? To my knowledge they have to be chained to the activated effect. EXAMPLE: Aluber is summoned, oppenent activates the effect of aluber, chain Fenrir as chainlink 2. In comparison, Ghost Oger has to be chained also to the activated effect.
They are trigger effects. They are spell speed 1. They cannot chain on top of another effect unless they all met their activation at the same time, then you can apply SEGOC.
It’s because they are not quick effects. Trigger effects that trigger when something happens always start in a new chain. Think of something like an Altergeist Multifaker for example.
If I have a set preparations and control a Kashtira fenrir and my opp passes prio in draw phase and I flip up prep and as chain link 2 my opponent goes imperm do I get to rip a card out of hand?
The Fenrir Aluber example can basically just be summarized as "Fenrir wasnt on the board and therefore couldnt chain link 2". Its a "when", so it misses timing basically.
"Alghoul Mazera" vs "Abyss Dweller", Since Alghoul says Banished instead like other cards that activate after being banished & is a separate effect which happens after it's banished, does it mean it activates while banished & not GY or Hand respectively.
At 3:34 you said shangri ira is NOT a continuous effect, but on the wiki it shows that it IS a continuous effect, I also saw on ygorganization that they ruled it that it is NOT a continuous effect. So basically im wondering if its incorrect on the wiki or it's correct but it's just a weird clause or something. Thanks for sharing.
The wiki lists the type of each effect in the order it appears on the card. The Continuous effect is the last effect, where it can detach to protect itself.
please show the card text after the 5 seconds have passed : for shangri-ira, "Each time a card(s) your opponent owns and possesses is banished face-down (except during the Damage Step): You can choose 1 unused Main Monster Zone or Spell & Trap Zone; it cannot be used while this monster is face-up on the field." means that even if it gets imperm'd, well this monster is still face-up on the field so get your book of eclipse ready boys and girls ^^ book of eclipse can work vs spright too as you can wait for him to summon 2 level 2s and then eclipse, so he cant link he cant xyz he cant summon any other spright :D also vs tearlaments he cant use the trap if he doesnt have face-up tearlaments, and tearlaments fusions getting flipped face-down is pretty cool to see :D
I have a ruling question: for Bystial Alba Los, is the skill drain effect for extra deck monsters the same as Shangri-Ira, where the card just checks to ensure that the monster is on board even if it’s negated?
Just curious how Fenrir won't be able to trigger, because he missed the activation despite seeing the resolution, yet World Lecay's Secret will still negate a monster effect even if the monster effect was activated while there were no Mekk-Knights on the field.
Fenrir has to be on field before a monster effect activates to trigger his effect. World Legacy Secret is a continuous effect. Although the question you posed assumes there was no monster AT ALL (even before). In that case Legacy would not work. From your question I would assume you meant a mekk knight was removed from field at activation but yet the Legacy card still negated a monster. This is correct because the mekk knight was still in the same column as the monster at effect activation EVEN if the mekk knight no longer is on field at activation (it got removed via cost for something). ---A monster effect ACTIVATED WHILE THERE WAS a mekk knight in the same column.
@@alextien7661 No, I mean I activate a monster effect while my monster is the only one on the field. My opponent chains Secret by flipping it face-up, to summon a Mekk-Knight from GY in the same column as my monster. Then somehow, at resolution, my monster effect is negated, because NOW there is a Mekk-Knight in its column, even though there was none when the effect was ACTIVATED. Somehow, this is how it works. I just want to know... why?
@@alextien7661 Thats incorrect the mekk knight has to be on the field during the resolution of the effect it doesnt matter if it wasnt their before but it has to be their at the end. Fenrir is worded completely different.
I have a question about the text "spells or effects" and "traps or effects" on some Kashtira cards. Does that mean any effect? like a monster effect? Or only the stated card type effect?
Can Fenrir, Ogre and Unicorn miss timing if the effect being activated wasnt the last thing that happened? Its a when you can effect, but it also says when this card declares an attack, or *if a monster effect is activated* so its also an if you can (???)
question about the first scenario. if the imperm is chained to the effect of the xyz monster preventing it from resolving does that free up your zones? I haven't read the card btw lol sorry
If you mean chained to the activation of the effect, then yes, your zones will be free still since you negated its effects from resolving. However, like Tom was saying, if the kashtira xyz monster effect resolves without interruption, it doesn’t matter what kind of negate you pull AFTER, one of your zones will be blocked lol
Another example I can think that’s similar to this is if opponent used eff of Archnemesis Protos to prevent special summons of light attributes on their turn, when it is your turn and you try to imperm/forbidden droplet the protos, you still won’t be able to special summon light monsters since protos’ effect had already resolved prior and applies until the end of the next turn.
if you chained imperm to the effect of Kashtira XYZ before your zones are locked then you won't be locked. Because it's effect would be negated before resolution.
I don't think the last scenario is evident from it's TCG text. It says "this card is already face up" which means you need it face-up already when the Trap was activated, but you don't need a Kashtira monster until when you would activate the trigger effect of preparations? I guess "this card is already face up" is code phrasing for a trigger-like effect, and controlling the monster is the actual condition.
It's not that I do not understand the "why it works this way" after the explaination. It's more like that for me - how the card is written, everything before the ":" seemed like the trigger and activation requirement. But if I understand it correctly, everything before the first comma, is trigger requirement?
Here's my question....can you Super Poly that Kashtira xyz with another another monster your opponent controls to free up a zone or are you still bound by its lock out effect?
I think you need a monster zone available first to be able to conduct the summon. If you don’t have a zone, you can’t super poly. I could be wrong though
the moment you start judging you will learn that rulings is only 5%. Dealing with players going: "I did this" and then they say "No I didn't" becomes the other 95%. Or when a friend of yours does something sketchy and now you have to make a decision to report on them.. OR when a player is purposefully abusing the policy and they are technically right but you have to also penalize them to a more serious extent due to their unsporting conduct. Judges aren't all about the rulings. Players start to muddy the truth to make it more sound favorable to them. This is to be expected.
@@MSTTV ah I see, so when I become a judge I'm gonna need to have to go thru a lot of things. That would eventually make me seem disliked towards the person I ruled a ruling on. That can interrupt my status as a judge, yeah judging seems very hard
no it isnt. it's a trigger effect that waits until the chain is resolved to be able to activate and does not and cannot be chained to the effect. it can also miss the activation timing because it is a "when....you can effect"
@@VyaxUltima that's not how that works at all. it's the same as abyss actor leading lady. the entire effect is a when effect. The if simply states another condition but does not change that it's a "when...you can" effect. PSCT is weird like that. Regardless because it's not a quick effect, all current quick effects have the denotion of them being quick or not in brackets, it will wait for the chain to resolve before being able to activate.
I think the same. I wanted to make the deck but too expensive for casual like me, and i think Fenrir will be limited during 2023 because decent/good/too strong in many decks!
Kashtira gonna ruin the meta game. That entire archetype is one sided as shit. Post PHHY just lock out 4 zones and extend a hand. Ghost reaper about to be a game changing hand trap
Use my link to install ✅ BLOODLINE for Free: app.adjust.com/1q0ywhg_1hxmh2e ✅ and receive a $20 worth starter pack!
“It wasn’t there to witness the activation of Aluber” lmao that sounds so funny. Imagine from a perspective Fenrir is like “aye, I heard you added something illegal when I wasn’t around. You gotta go son” Aluber: “Naw fam, you weren’t even here, how do you know that?” Fenrir: “damn, yous right. Go on.”
Fenrir: if my opponent declares an attack, does he trigger too?
Thank you for clarifying the trigger effects for the Kashtira monsters, and acknowledging that the other video is wrong.
Not a fan of the ruling that we apply to Kashmir Shangri-La in being unable to reclaim zones. There are new Firewall/Cyberse cards coming out of Cyberstorm Access, and those cards are not good enough. Now they're gonna get beaten up more by such a ruling.
These videos are absolute gold, thanks for making them, Tom! Hopefully you'll make one for Bystial as there's plenty of interesting interactions with them that might get confusing.
Are the Kashtira monsters effects that say "when your opponent activates a monster effect, you can do this" able to be used on the opponents turn, or are they only able to use their effects on your own turn since it does not say quick effect?
Both turns, except during damage step
Maybe if this was released a few days ago that finals may of went differently.
Interested to learn why Fenrir wouldn't see Aluber activating its effect and able to cause its trigger effect in a new chain when summoned as chain link 2, but exosisters can activate Vadis in response to you using d.d. crow to move a card from the grave but the summoned sisters will see that banish and be able to activate their trigger effects in a new chain
That's because Fenrir and the Exosisters have completely different activation triggers. Fenrir only activates when it "sees" a monster activate, which it will miss if you chain to the monster effect and summon. Exosisters, on the other hand, activate when they "see" a card move out of the graveyard, which hasn't happened yet if you chain Vadis to D.D. Crow. A better example would be trying to chain Vadis to the graveyard effect of an Eldlich trap since the Exosisters would also not be able to activate since they wouldn't have been on the field to "see" the card move.
@@Ryuujin721 I see it's because the d.d. crow hasn't resolved yet causing the card to be banished before the exosisters hit the board where in Fenrir's case the monster has already been activated.
Also just an fyi, crow doesnt activate exosisters except for martha.
@@maxdemjancik6676 That only applies to the Exosister player's D.D. Crow. If the opponent does it then all the Exosisters can activate.
Konami really looked at Link Jokers in Cardfight! Vanguard and said "I can break that"
Rulingquestion: if I activate dinomischus targeting a face down card my opponent controls, we then realize it has to target a face up card do i have to retarget a legal target if ther is any or can I set it face down?
Can someone also send me a lik to an example on the database, i couldnt find something similar
you should show the card text on screen when asking these questions.
in regards to the question with imperm and preparations if I was to activate preparations with a kashtira monster on field and my opponent chains infinite impermanence (the opposite order than the question) would I be able to activate the effect to banish from hand in a new chain?
Tom, you are so amazing with these explanations. Thank you for all your effect!
I have problems in MD: I have the Kashtira monster(s) already face up since my turn, my Preparations already activated since the opponents standby phase, and the opponent activates cards and effects, but nothing happens with his hand. Any idea about that?
In the hand viewing ruling it says "opponent may gain an advantage". However in this case, the duelist who caused the damaged game state is the one gaining an adventage. Not the opponent :/
i dont believe you can look at the hand with the second example, it says controll a kashtira on field by time the effect of a trap is activated, not resolved. they activated imperm (so the condition was met for activation) and there was no kashtira on the field
Unfortunately, u are incorrect in this. Controlling a Kashtira, only needs to be there by the time of activation.
This particular ruling is in the ocg data base and listed specifically.
Consider each trigger point as a separate condition, and not one you must simultaneously meet.
Firstly, it's a trigger like effect, so it is going to happen in the next chain, like most trigger effects, it needs to meet conditions.
Your opponent has to use a trap card/effect, this is something that happens in the previous chain and is restricted to that timing.
If you control a Kashtira monsters, a Kashtira just needs to be there at the time the trigger can activate.
This card was already face up, really indicating this effect cannot be an activated trap card further indicating this is a trigger like.
Typically the condition of " if you control X monster," it just needs to be there at time of activation normally for triggers and ignitions.
Why does the Kashtira Cards Start a New chain? To my knowledge they have to be chained to the activated effect. EXAMPLE: Aluber is summoned, oppenent activates the effect of aluber, chain Fenrir as chainlink 2.
In comparison, Ghost Oger has to be chained also to the activated effect.
thats not right at all
@@Gavvi2552 and i want to know why
They are trigger effects. They are spell speed 1. They cannot chain on top of another effect unless they all met their activation at the same time, then you can apply SEGOC.
It’s because they are not quick effects. Trigger effects that trigger when something happens always start in a new chain. Think of something like an Altergeist Multifaker for example.
If I have a set preparations and control a Kashtira fenrir and my opp passes prio in draw phase and I flip up prep and as chain link 2 my opponent goes imperm do I get to rip a card out of hand?
The Fenrir Aluber example can basically just be summarized as "Fenrir wasnt on the board and therefore couldnt chain link 2".
Its a "when", so it misses timing basically.
Incorrect
"Alghoul Mazera" vs "Abyss Dweller", Since Alghoul says Banished instead like other cards that activate after being banished & is a separate effect which happens after it's banished, does it mean it activates while banished & not GY or Hand respectively.
At 3:34 you said shangri ira is NOT a continuous effect, but on the wiki it shows that it IS a continuous effect, I also saw on ygorganization that they ruled it that it is NOT a continuous effect. So basically im wondering if its incorrect on the wiki or it's correct but it's just a weird clause or something. Thanks for sharing.
The wiki lists the type of each effect in the order it appears on the card. The Continuous effect is the last effect, where it can detach to protect itself.
@@RegiRuler ahh ok I understand, thanks for clarifying.
Zone locking is NOT continuous, Self protection is.
This is perfect, thanks for this video was great as I’m learning to play this deck and I’m slowly building it. It’s awesome
Nice. But it’d help to put the card text up when trying to answer cuz I have no clue without reading the card.
please show the card text after the 5 seconds have passed :
for shangri-ira, "Each time a card(s) your opponent owns and possesses is banished face-down (except during the Damage Step): You can choose 1 unused Main Monster Zone or Spell & Trap Zone; it cannot be used while this monster is face-up on the field."
means that even if it gets imperm'd, well this monster is still face-up on the field
so get your book of eclipse ready boys and girls ^^
book of eclipse can work vs spright too as you can wait for him to summon 2 level 2s and then eclipse, so he cant link he cant xyz he cant summon any other spright :D
also vs tearlaments he cant use the trap if he doesnt have face-up tearlaments, and tearlaments fusions getting flipped face-down is pretty cool to see :D
I have a ruling question: for Bystial Alba Los, is the skill drain effect for extra deck monsters the same as Shangri-Ira, where the card just checks to ensure that the monster is on board even if it’s negated?
Will Fenrir trigger on attack declaration banished the attacked monster will there be a replay then?
When you attack with Fenrir you can activate his effect to banish then after resolution you can then replay attack.
If I control a Kashtira monster and Kashtira Overlap is banished, can I target and negate a monster during my opponent’s turn?
Just curious how Fenrir won't be able to trigger, because he missed the activation despite seeing the resolution, yet World Lecay's Secret will still negate a monster effect even if the monster effect was activated while there were no Mekk-Knights on the field.
secret negates on resolution thats why
Fenrir has to be on field before a monster effect activates to trigger his effect.
World Legacy Secret is a continuous effect. Although the question you posed assumes there was no monster AT ALL (even before). In that case Legacy would not work.
From your question I would assume you meant a mekk knight was removed from field at activation but yet the Legacy card still negated a monster.
This is correct because the mekk knight was still in the same column as the monster at effect activation EVEN if the mekk knight no longer is on field at activation (it got removed via cost for something).
---A monster effect ACTIVATED WHILE THERE WAS a mekk knight in the same column.
@@alextien7661 No, I mean I activate a monster effect while my monster is the only one on the field.
My opponent chains Secret by flipping it face-up, to summon a Mekk-Knight from GY in the same column as my monster.
Then somehow, at resolution, my monster effect is negated, because NOW there is a Mekk-Knight in its column, even though there was none when the effect was ACTIVATED.
Somehow, this is how it works.
I just want to know... why?
@@alextien7661 Thats incorrect the mekk knight has to be on the field during the resolution of the effect it doesnt matter if it wasnt their before but it has to be their at the end. Fenrir is worded completely different.
I have a question about the text "spells or effects" and "traps or effects" on some Kashtira cards. Does that mean any effect? like a monster effect? Or only the stated card type effect?
spell or effect spell , trap e effect traps, no monster
Yup, I asked for my friend and we got the answer a while ago, thanks anyways
Can Fenrir, Ogre and Unicorn miss timing if the effect being activated wasnt the last thing that happened? Its a when you can effect, but it also says when this card declares an attack, or *if a monster effect is activated* so its also an if you can (???)
It won't miss timing, if you are talking about the banish effect.
@@MSTTV i was talking about that effect. Thanks for the reply (only saw that now, sorry)
@MSTTV question when fenrir, unicorn, or ogre attacks and a mirror force actives, can their effect still apply?
question about the first scenario. if the imperm is chained to the effect of the xyz monster preventing it from resolving does that free up your zones? I haven't read the card btw lol sorry
Any zones that were already blocked before using Imperm will remain blocked.
If you mean chained to the activation of the effect, then yes, your zones will be free still since you negated its effects from resolving. However, like Tom was saying, if the kashtira xyz monster effect resolves without interruption, it doesn’t matter what kind of negate you pull AFTER, one of your zones will be blocked lol
Another example I can think that’s similar to this is if opponent used eff of Archnemesis Protos to prevent special summons of light attributes on their turn, when it is your turn and you try to imperm/forbidden droplet the protos, you still won’t be able to special summon light monsters since protos’ effect had already resolved prior and applies until the end of the next turn.
if you chained imperm to the effect of Kashtira XYZ before your zones are locked then you won't be locked. Because it's effect would be negated before resolution.
Got the last one wrong...
sometimes reading YGO cards is a tough challenge XD
I don't think the last scenario is evident from it's TCG text. It says "this card is already face up" which means you need it face-up already when the Trap was activated, but you don't need a Kashtira monster until when you would activate the trigger effect of preparations? I guess "this card is already face up" is code phrasing for a trigger-like effect, and controlling the monster is the actual condition.
It's not that I do not understand the "why it works this way" after the explaination. It's more like that for me - how the card is written, everything before the ":" seemed like the trigger and activation requirement.
But if I understand it correctly, everything before the first comma, is trigger requirement?
I think U can chain Fenrir in aluber. IT worked Out in Edo pro, or Not?
Can u upload another video about kashtira spell and xyz ruling ?
How would Fenrirs banish resolve on the small Floowandereeze birds?
They are banished face-up by their own effect, as they are leaving the field.
the same way they interact with evenly match, which banishes them faceup
They banish FACE UP!
why no blackwings
Here's my question....can you Super Poly that Kashtira xyz with another another monster your opponent controls to free up a zone or are you still bound by its lock out effect?
Shangri-Ira only blocks zones while it's face-up on the field. Removing it unblocks the zone.
I think you need a monster zone available first to be able to conduct the summon. If you don’t have a zone, you can’t super poly. I could be wrong though
@@Harrowing999 i think so too
@@Harrowing999 the Extra Monster Zone would be available. But yes, you do need a free zone.
@@VyaxUltima ah yes it only locks main monster zones. The EMZ is free
So book of moon buy outs?
Awesomeness info. Thanksgiving you!
So the Kashtira main deck monsters can activate on the opponents turn?
If the trigger is met, yes.
So it like amazement guy I forgot his name
Thanks for the vid tom
yesss we finally got a sponsor!
Wait, is this the first sponsor you've seen?
Very helpful bud. Building a kashtira deck, need every bit of info I can get 😂
that should be a major they see your hand thats so dumb
Thanks Tom! I always enjoy these ruling video's 😁👍 keep it up brother!!
Kashtira? Cash Tier? Is Konmai trolling us? 🤔
Why would i watch these illegal plays i don’t want to go to jail
4min só ygo pro has a wrong ruling lol, nice to know thanks
Maybe I should sign up to be a judge and do the rc test. Cause holy I keep getting these correct easily
the moment you start judging you will learn that rulings is only 5%.
Dealing with players going: "I did this" and then they say "No I didn't"
becomes the other 95%.
Or when a friend of yours does something sketchy and now you have to make a decision to report on them..
OR when a player is purposefully abusing the policy and they are technically right but you have to also penalize them to a more serious extent due to their unsporting conduct.
Judges aren't all about the rulings.
Players start to muddy the truth to make it more sound favorable to them. This is to be expected.
@@MSTTV ah I see, so when I become a judge I'm gonna need to have to go thru a lot of things. That would eventually make me seem disliked towards the person I ruled a ruling on. That can interrupt my status as a judge, yeah judging seems very hard
1.Marco
2.law
3.sabo
4.Zoro
Oh wow that's why people aren't playing dark ruler in the OCG... jeez
Shangri-la is actually wack hooooly
They? Are you playing against multiple people at the same time?
And that's a problem why? What make it illegal if it's allowed to be done?
ace attorney animations lol
fenrir is a quick effect....
no it isnt. it's a trigger effect that waits until the chain is resolved to be able to activate and does not and cannot be chained to the effect. it can also miss the activation timing because it is a "when....you can effect"
@@potatoexe5410 the "when" is only on attacking. Triggering from an effect activation is "if".
@@VyaxUltima that's not how that works at all. it's the same as abyss actor leading lady. the entire effect is a when effect. The if simply states another condition but does not change that it's a "when...you can" effect. PSCT is weird like that. Regardless because it's not a quick effect, all current quick effects have the denotion of them being quick or not in brackets, it will wait for the chain to resolve before being able to activate.
They reall screw up these card names didnt they.
my theory is that kashtira deck will get fully banned sadly cause its to strong
I think the same. I wanted to make the deck but too expensive for casual like me, and i think Fenrir will be limited during 2023 because decent/good/too strong in many decks!
Saludos desde Perú
Archetype is still toxic when the new support comes out…
Y’all say that every card in the game is toxic so boring
@@athenaproductions3569 so don’t comment if you find comments like this boring. Also what card am I talking about? I clearly wrote archetype 😓
@@kevinoviedo7280 you’re so toxic so don’t comment if you don’t like this type of comments
@@athenaproductions3569 where is the toxicity? Can’t handle the truth about cards with bad design?
Kashtira gonna ruin the meta game. That entire archetype is one sided as shit.
Post PHHY just lock out 4 zones and extend a hand.
Ghost reaper about to be a game changing hand trap
Not the precious meta! Oh no, 😭 lamo
Bansh cards face-down is a red flag in card design
kashtira is weak to a lot of HTs and board breakers, youll be ok
Kashtira new support combo do exactly 5 summons with no negate so you can just Nibiru them.
💥
👨⚖️
Yeah, I'm doing the right thing to not play YGO for the next few formats.
algo comment