Schiff: How To Use Trills For Expression

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ย. 2014
  • Andras Schiff's Piano Masterclass on how to use trills to emphasis expression in Beethoven's Piano Sonatas. The full 170 minute masterclass is available at
    bit.ly/MMFDVDstore
    bit.ly/SchiffBeYT
    The Masterclass Media Foundation films and records world-class musicians giving masterclasses and teaching students.
    The mission is to give both music students and music lovers the chance to benefit from the inspired teaching of great musicians and to create an important archive for future generations.
    Subscribe here: uk.th-cam.com/users/subscription_ce...
    Download store - bit.ly/MMFstore
    DVD store - masterclassfoundation.org/shop
    Facebook - bit.ly/FacebookMMF
    Twitter - bit.ly/TwitterMMF
    G+ - plus.google.com/+MMFmasterclass

ความคิดเห็น • 87

  • @hellomate639
    @hellomate639 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I heard him play op. 109 live last night.
    It was amazing.

  • @Bronzebk
    @Bronzebk 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Sir András Schiff: IMO, atop the Best Pianist ever.

  • @quaver1239
    @quaver1239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Grateful thanks to Andràs Schiff, the Masterclass Media Foundation, and TH-cam. I learn a tremendous amount every time. And Mr Schiff is indeed a master of musicianship.

  • @sebastiansingh3228
    @sebastiansingh3228 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Those curtains are awesome

    • @renelvital
      @renelvital 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sebbie Tirath Thanks

  • @icecube8349
    @icecube8349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are good, you are superb, the way you talk, the way you play the piano, the way you fascinate listeners, I would have liked you as a teacher, I would have been a great musician. I am older now (67) and still am hypnotized by your skills. You are dammed good. Every day I am practising Bach on my piano, a Bechstein, and you are the shadow by TH-cam to give me instructions and patience, feed and power to continue.You are good man. you are the Sunshine of knowledge about so many musicians. I have learned so much due to your way of communication, your way of perception and talk.You are superb.Thank you. I do thank you.Norbert

  • @ShirleyKirsten
    @ShirleyKirsten 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing analysis and playing. Emotion/fused with structure/harmony. I just take exception to the blanket statement that Baroque and Classical trills are "decorative." They are indeed expressive, as Mozart was in particular allied to the opera.

  • @Ramatganski
    @Ramatganski 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Actually there's an expressive usage of trills in Bach's English suite no.6 Gigue.

    • @williamhendy4170
      @williamhendy4170 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ramatganski shmanski Aha wonderful! So much in music owes its origin to Bach!

    • @pengyigu7164
      @pengyigu7164 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      thumb up!

    • @Geopholus
      @Geopholus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rama, You are right ! in fact Bach doesn't use ornaments without an express purpose, for the purpose of expressing powerful musical structures.

    • @willemDiscool
      @willemDiscool 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The prelude in g minor from WTC book 1 has 4 long trills that, in my opinion, also are used for expression. Listen to Schiff's recording and you'll know what I mean

  • @christopherayres164
    @christopherayres164 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trills are the wonderment of mechanical wave without surprise, yet still hidden.

  • @TheBach109
    @TheBach109 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The decay of sound on a harpsichord is/was so fast that the trill gave extended life to a note that would otherwise have been "dead" by the next beat. And the trill, and thus the note, could continue to sound at the composer's discretion.

    • @man0sticks
      @man0sticks ปีที่แล้ว

      Good example of this particular use of the trill would be Invention #4.

  • @ownyourgov
    @ownyourgov 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be helpful to get the distinctions he's making between Beethoven's approach and Bach's rather than his use of words.

  • @pianopera
    @pianopera 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Very interesting analysis, but when the trill comes in the right hand from 5:10, it should sound continuously without all these interruptions. For expressive, fluent trills, I very much prefer Claudio Arrau...

    • @berlinzerberus
      @berlinzerberus 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I entirely agree!
      Die Trillerkette in dieser Schlussvariation zu unterbrechen ist eine rein technische Maßnahme und keine musikalische, um die 'stars' sicher zu treffen. Triller in Beethovens Spätwerk dienen entweder der ätherischen Verklärung oder der dramatisierenden Impulsgebung. Hier ist wohl das Letztere gemeint: auf einem schnellen rotierenden ununterbrochen sich bewegenden Triller haben die Einzeltöne, die wie gewichtige Funken klingen, die auf die Erde fallen, eine kolossale Wirkung. Ich würde diese Einzeltöne auch nicht 'Sterne' nennen, die für Schiff wahrscheinlich durch die technische Erleichterung so wirken mögen, aber doch eher schwach leuchtend. Manchmal bringt allerdings das vermeintlich Schwierigere im Ergebnis eine größere Wirkung mit sich, weil sie dadurch erst entstehen kann.
      Arrau als profundes Beispiel für die richtige Ausführung des langen Trillers am Schluss der Sonate zu nennen, kann ich nur bestätigen, denn ich habe sie meisterhaft von ihm live gehört.

    • @pianopera
      @pianopera 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      berlinzerberus Exactly! There are similar ethereal trills in the famous Arietta (opus 111), where the right hand has to play them continuously, combined with the theme, while the left hand is playing figuration -- not at all easy. I have never heard that passage more beautifully than in Arrau's version.
      Sorry to say, but when a well-known concert pianist gives a Masterclass about trills in Beethoven's Sonatas, I expect him to have overcome any technical difficulties... it really sounds a bit clumsy this way!

    • @Dechuoubenii
      @Dechuoubenii 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      pianopera
      Anything a pianist of that level does is a conscious choice and not a technical difficulty he didn't outpass... Understanding why he did that choice would be the interresting thing.

    • @pianopera
      @pianopera 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dechuoubenii If it's a conscious choice, it's a very bad one. From 5:54 you can see clearly that his trill technique in his right hand is not sufficient to play a fluent, uninterrupted trill. It should be played with the fingering 1-2.

    • @doodyaviv
      @doodyaviv 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      pianopera he is one of the best beethoven piano player in the world! he know all 32 (and hundreds more pices) by heart and never make mistakes.. its not difficult to him

  • @man0sticks
    @man0sticks ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Schiff’s critics are engaging in semantic nit picking. The distinction Schiff is making is perfectly clear. Ornamental vs. expressive is not a perfect dichotomy, but I wish more native speakers of English had Schiff’s command of the language. Of course every note should be expressive of something! Consider BWV 775. The trills are there primarily to sustain a single note on a harpsichord. Gould does not play them at all, as being unnecessary on a modern piano. Dinnerstein slows the piece down and plays them in a beautifully romantic way that would be impossible on a harpsichord. In the end, it’s the music that matters, not the imperfect way in which we talk about it.

  • @shayesteberahman
    @shayesteberahman 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What sonata was this?

    • @neilkrzeski6431
      @neilkrzeski6431 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shayeste Berahman Beeethoven Sonata No.30, Op. 109

  • @bakuto.1055
    @bakuto.1055 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the name of the sonata? 1st one

    • @WitheredBreak81
      @WitheredBreak81 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sonata op 109 in E major

    • @WitheredBreak81
      @WitheredBreak81 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He only plays this sonata btw

  • @mypianofavourites1635
    @mypianofavourites1635 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Please State ....The EXACT Name of Beethoven Sonata....
    I am interested in it for TWO 2 Main Reasons.
    Reason A) It has some Boogie Woogie Type Hand Configurations in Parts.
    Reason B) I want to Explore...The Shining Stars Effect you talk about.
    Please Respond

    • @MMFmasterclass
      @MMFmasterclass  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there, It's Beethoven's Sonata no.32, Thanks for watching!

    • @calmeforet1
      @calmeforet1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The Masterclass Media Foundation No.30 Op.109, not No.32

    • @user-cy9lu9dm6n
      @user-cy9lu9dm6n 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Images Oubliées because op111 has some boogie woogie feel in the second movement that's why they misunderstood it

    • @jonathandifiore4478
      @jonathandifiore4478 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      My Piano Favourites it Is the 30 piano sonata

    • @albertomartin4812
      @albertomartin4812 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      As Jason said, check out op. 111 for some really awesome boogie woogie time.

  • @MegaJohnhammond
    @MegaJohnhammond 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the curtains

  • @Kumagoroo23
    @Kumagoroo23 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What piece is it??

    • @kuanhouchio9881
      @kuanhouchio9881 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Beethoven's piano sonata no 30

    • @Kumagoroo23
      @Kumagoroo23 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      chio glenn thanks a lot

  • @assafsommer
    @assafsommer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Trills in Baroque didn't have any expressive quality?! Is this what he really thinks? Hard to believe

  • @sirdicaudore
    @sirdicaudore 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "Trill in Baroque and Early classical music has always been decorative" ????? That is the wrongest think that one can ever say! With all respect Andras, apoggiatura and trill (written by the composer or improvised by the interpreter) in early music are the most important and the most expressive elements of an ornamented "canto" and the absolute first thing a "baroque" player or singer has to learn and study! It is not "only a pleasing/beautiful effect" The dissonant nature of these ornaments creates tension and a variety of great dramatic effects! In one word EXPRESSION. You certainly know it well and you do it perfectly when you play Bach or Scarlatti! Why do you say the opposite?

    • @henrywang6931
      @henrywang6931 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      I think what he meant was: Trill in Baroque and early classical can be neglected, but the music would still exist, since ornaments are added upon the base notes. But if you neglect the trill in Beethoven's music, the music would lose its essence, and cease to exist.

    • @Geopholus
      @Geopholus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      sirdicaudore. I couldn't agree with YOU MORE !!! I expressly came to this video because I wondered what Schiff could possibly have to say about ornamentation, since for the last twenty years or so he has abused them so badly when playing Bach ! Now I know the reason ! He views them as decoration ! Bach includes at the beginning of Anna Magdalena notebook a table of ornaments, and he usually specifies them, in each piece, but as the last and greatest exponent of Baroque counterpoint, he came out of an improvisatory tradition, where composers who performed needed to know how to use them. For Bach they are a very important part of 'sound', voice leading and maintenance of a cogent harmonic structure. So many times Bach uses ornaments to avoid open fifths or octaves and sometimes parallel fifths and octaves, when a stress point is required in the music, but it would spoil clean melodic voice leading to use another harmony. Schiff's superfluous use of them , including wrong ornaments when needed, and lots of extras when completely unneeded, have made it difficult for me to listen to him anymore. Clearly he 'was' (perhaps IS) a top Bach interpreter, and a very intelligent man, with a great knowledge of music,...but sometimes too much knowledge hides simple TRUTH,... sorry Sergio, judge me and others for the merits of our ideas. To those much blessed ,.. much is required... this includes Schiff,.. please bear the mantle of maestro with humility. In Bach virtually nothing is superfluous, which doesn't mean the ornaments are cast in stone,... as many great performers have proven!

    • @henrywang6931
      @henrywang6931 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting point. Thank you Geopholus.

    • @xenolalia
      @xenolalia 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And, of course, it was strictly verboten until 1750 to be at all expressive when wooing, worshiping, or showing off :^).

    • @gauriblomeyer1835
      @gauriblomeyer1835 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I admire the "Besserwisser" here. What bull.... ! It is really amazing how clever the critics are. I haven't got the ears to hear all this. For me it is more important to enjoy the happy atmosphere which Schiff creates. There are different interpreters, some are great in their technical performance others - even those which do not master difficult passages - can bring you unending joy.

  • @jongleurette
    @jongleurette 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I never thought I would ever have anything to say to Mr. Schiff that I disagree with, but I do. Ornaments, graces, etc. in the Baroque Era were used for both rhythmic and harmonic interest. Very early Baroque, and before, ornaments were used melodically, melismatically. The Classic Era also featured ornaments for both harmonic and rhythmic interest, however, playing on the beat caused an apoggiatura effect, which allowed for dissonances to be played in acceptable ways. Sorry, but I have done extensive studies in this area.

    • @TheNissanr33
      @TheNissanr33 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +jongleurette Yes but a faster, more decorative trill in the lower register would be a sea of unpalatable mess for the ears...would it not? The interpretation is that beethoven couldn't have wanted a trill any faster than, what sounds like triplet time per beat, as this tempo has just enough uneasiness but with expressive qualities, without drowning the right hand melody too much.

    • @jongleurette
      @jongleurette 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I understand what you are pointing out. However, my comment was directed at Schiff's statement that ornamentation had less meaning in earlier music.

    • @TheNissanr33
      @TheNissanr33 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Aah o.k, got you!!...my mistake! It makes sense with that conversation, yes. Thanks.

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      jongleurette : And you imagine that András Schiff has not done extensive studies in this area?!

  • @MuckyGhost
    @MuckyGhost 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so i'm no expert, but there's no way he's screwing up those trills so flagrantly (from about 5:50) by accident. it's strange that he doesn't just do it, though...? you get the feeling he's concentrating more on his words than his playing.

    • @wallacecarvalho5032
      @wallacecarvalho5032 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think that he does this to accentuate the notes played with the pinky. He must be able to play this without screwing up the trills, he's certainly technically capable of it.

    • @yurimeyrowitz6788
      @yurimeyrowitz6788 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There's a difference between a lecture and a concert performance... this is the former...

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is not a performance; it’s a teaching session which we are fortunate enough to experience.

  • @dressedtosmellgood
    @dressedtosmellgood 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    less steinway more bosendorfer plz

  • @noiselesspatient
    @noiselesspatient 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Goldberg var 28... should the Bach be played as free trills? No pianist would dare 🤔

  • @99Grigor
    @99Grigor 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Pianopera is correct. His trill is too measured in the RH. But interesting analysis. He is a deep thinker much like Barenboim.

  • @davidjanson9900
    @davidjanson9900 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    no thrill in the trill

  • @michaelp4657
    @michaelp4657 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think I might understand what he's trying to say about the difference between this Beethovian trill and other ornamental trills. His use of the word "expressive" is definitely questionable in my opinion, as well as his historical proclamation. Think of the 'metric acceleration' to a trill in Bach's famous G minor prelude from WTC Book 1, or the trill in the D minor two part invention. I do not think Schiff is stupid, though, I wonder if he's just searching his English vocabulary. I have also accidentally tripped over proper word choice when trying to speak, ad-hoc, in front of people, about a piece of music.

    • @quaver1239
      @quaver1239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How nice of you: You don’t think Schiff is stupid. What a kind person you are. Wow.

  • @martin8uq
    @martin8uq 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is that insufferable noise in the back ground? creaking chairs?

    • @VereBirdIII
      @VereBirdIII 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +martin8uq Must be a thrill

  • @leopoldpoldi6815
    @leopoldpoldi6815 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    "The trill in baroque and classical music didn't have any expressive quality"....What??? I didn't expect to hear something so wrong.

    • @JumpDiffusion
      @JumpDiffusion 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ah, what does this Schiff guy know, right?? LOL )))

    • @NoiseOverMusic
      @NoiseOverMusic 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey! Leopold Poldi! You are a moron!

    • @wojtas2524
      @wojtas2524 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, because violins can't sustain notes

    • @greatmomentsofopera7170
      @greatmomentsofopera7170 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes I found this very strange. countless moments when trills are highly expressive, not merely decorative.

    • @ShirleyKirsten
      @ShirleyKirsten 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the only part of Schiff's video that I took exception with... Trills are expressive in Mozart, for example--as he emulated the opera.. and a convincing opera singer would think of them as fast MELODY. Same for pianists and other instrumentalists.

  • @Brandon-a-writer
    @Brandon-a-writer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chopin's trills were less decorative than Beethoven's :-/

    • @tomerpianist
      @tomerpianist 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brandon Nobles I agree

    • @MrBeen992
      @MrBeen992 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...because in Chopins music trills are are inexorably intertwined in the musical structure

    • @ternitamas
      @ternitamas 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      can you cite an example so I can grasp better your idea

  • @slakva.school
    @slakva.school 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Isn't he genius..?

  • @matthewvarney6214
    @matthewvarney6214 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Going from quavers to triplets to semi quavers is my least favourite concept

  • @shaythiele1320
    @shaythiele1320 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    666 likes yikes