CAA : J Sai Deepak Interview | 'CAA Illegality Claim Dissected " | CAA Implementation | News18
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มี.ค. 2024
- The amendments to the citizenship law - passed by Parliament in 2019 and notified by the government Monday evening, to come into effect weeks before the general election - have triggered a back-and-forth with the opposition accusing the ruling BJP of polarising voters, and the government, hitting back.
#CAA #anticaaprotest #legality #news18
n18oc_politics
![ช้างศึกสู้ต่อไป!! พาเปียโน ดูบอลไทยครั้งแรก ตกรอบแบบโคตรเสียดาย!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4WloIH645Lg/mqdefault.jpg)
SC should concentrate on pending cases . Please note that 1000 of people are staying in jail not knowing their case
Not staying in jail hut in jail.
Abhinav is CJI's son so obviously he do not care about rights of Indian citizens of getting timely justice.
They are as important as Bonds issue if not more -pendency 0f civil cases 30years plus. Disgraceful.
@@abhianusaeesoman4182Yeah, yeah, only the BJP cares about Indians. All others are anti-national bigots aren't they. Laughable!
@@123XTSKFast tracking cases will hurt justice itself. Yes there is need to make sure that all people find justice as soon as possible but it isn't that easy.
Also the bonds case was of national importance, and it will always supercede individual justice (sadly), but that is something that is generally accepted on all forums. Otherwise, the same argument could be used against the Ram Mandir verdict, that why is this matter being given importance all of a sudden when there are hundreds of cases pending.
Why there is muslim personal law? If our country is secular
Every religion has its own personal laws not only Muslims. Hindus, Christians, Parsi, Jews have their own personal laws also. Secularism does not prohibit any religion from having its own personal laws. It simply excludes a State from having a particular religion.
@@debarshisarkar4418 Thats a bullshit logic. Why does muslims get 4 marriages and the ability to marry under 18 girls. What kind of secularism is that?
debarshisarkar4418 hmmm in Secular country Muslims and other can have their person laws practices but not for Hindus the same applies to the money of every Mandirs and many such examples....
@@debarshisarkar4418 ya but hindu personal law restricts the hindus in a different way regarding marriage divorce etc. On the other hand muslim law allows any garbage they follow as faith... And triple thalak was one of that permitted laws!!!😂
Secular word was not supposed to be in the constitution. It was added by IG by 42nd constitutional ammendment 1976 during her emergency rule. And later on none had the 2/3 majority in both houses to get rid of it by another amendment.
We need UCC. The society need to move towards progressive ideas.
First stop collegium system 👍
Judicial reforms are a must. SC is the most pampered and privileged institution in the world
Yes, so that govts cannot behave like dictators and put oppn behind bars and run washing machines
Agree but most pampered one is SC OF INDIA
Stupid
@@crankmishra3861 U literally told the same thing
They have screwed every organisation - CBI, ED, IT, EC, Banking, Foreign Trade etc, and now they want the Judiciary to also screw it and screw with it. Really ?
last 6 years so many Individuals of pakistan, Afghan, and Bangladesh so many got Indian citizenship.. CAA is speical specific and limited group... so CAA is right
It's based Nehru Liaquat agreement that deals with Muslims and non Muslims of erstwhile India after partition. It applies to persecuted minorities in Pak and India.
Is the objections that we are not giving citizenship for entire Pakistan, Bangladesh and afghanistan citizen.
@@ramachandrannair4554 It seems. Junior Chandrachud is Lutyens, Islamists and evangelists inspired anti national.Is.Chandrachud different? How did he release Zubair? Jr Chndrachud's influence was there? His speech raises doubts.
@@subbaraotanguturu9271 I think water is being tested by the speech of Junior Chandrachud to estimate the public mood
While international pressure is mounting on India on the drug issue the junior has specifically selected ,I doubt , CAA,NPR&NRC in order for him not to antagonise the right wing supporters /friends but only to gain popularity.
@@seeniinn1You mean he spoke for RW, the Hindus!? He supported Lutyens, muslims and conversion mafia than so called RW people. All Hindus who support their own cause are RWs for them and are worse than jihadis, evangelists, who are more dangerous than jihadis filled muslims. They converted the entire NE while Muslims one Kashmir presently. WB is on the way out. Now Christians to grab another Christian state from Manipur. They killed Meteis but blaming them, BJP, government and Hindus as a whole.
This is why the SC MyLords need Collegium system for their kith and kin.
🤡🤡
Collegium should stop first. Otherwise this junior will be the next judge
High Courts and Supreme Court are the worst examples of dynastic rule. Not just judge but this guy could become future CJI. CJI D Y Chandrachud after all is the son of former CJI Y V Chandrachud an open supporter of Indira Gandhi's draconian emergency rule.
nepotism of highest order.
Nepo kid supreamcourtmacy
exactly !!
it's time for clean up...these people make us lose faith in the judiciary! Biased guys should not be allowed as judges. Like USA there should be an agency to take control of these kind of people! They are not god and such judges should never be allowed to take decisions on their own....
Sai Deepak sir is the best person to reply to these headless chickens.
chandrchud's son is walking argument against nepotism in legal field
😂😂both chandrachuds actually look like chickens if tbh
Without the partition background the argument is incomplete
And unfortunately, partition and it's terrifying consequences are a fact and an important part of the discussion whether one agrees or not.
The views of Son could be a proxy for the father! So the bias can be seen right now! We don’t have to wait for a decision
👏👏👏
True!!!! Chip of the old, woke, clueless block eh!!😂😂
Lol...do you even know what bias means?😂😂 What Mr Chandrachud Jr. Said is absolutely rational and true
@@user-xk4jz1hy9x that’s precisely what bias means. You got it
then I'm guessing you're one of those who chanted "Go corona Go" to chase away the corona virus😂😂😂
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree in case of CJI’s son🤢🤮🤮😡
It’s not even an apple, it’s a diseased leaf.
Well said!
So it doesn't matter if persecuted people from these 3 Islamic paradise nations are stopped from coming here on grounds of equality..as "long I argue and shine in front of the world"
You are right, both are mentioned of Integrity and not Andh bhakts.
No they are biased against certain groups and their judgement is not fair in many cases. s@@dhiraj7892
Mr chandrachur junior needs to understand the caa law as it shows he is ignorant to the real and specific issues
True
Was eagerly waiting for JSD to blast the ARGUMENTS made by Abhinav Chandrachud.
Me 2
@@ritusingh8880me 3😂
Ab smjh aega ki paala kisse pada h....jsd waiting for this child😅
chandrachud family is purely name worth. CHUDIYA.
Actually he will be future CJI n JSD will be adv 😢@@varahamihir_
J Sai Deepak is always so well articulated 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Brahmin Power rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 😂
@@LaPlaya-rw1cp what else can you crib on.
@@LaPlaya-rw1cp are bhai band karo ab salo aise hi karte rahe kahin ka nahin rahoge
He is a moron and a bigot
@@LaPlaya-rw1cp i'm Brahmin too but stfu...u may not even the hindu
A Parsi from Iran does not come under the category of the ‘Partition Debt’ unlike the others 3 countries in CAA
kkurran 4.97 clearly says that living in a kkuffar country ( India) is hharram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.
When were Parsis not included in this country and when were they not protected. India is the perhaps the only country with Parsis flourishing and not living as 2nd class citizens. So, please refrain from talking about the rights of Parsis. Some of our best people have been parsis
@@monadebata5223
Moron. Parsi we’re not part of partition. Partition happened because of Islam and affected persons were other religions. How many Parsi are there in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bsngladesh,
Idiot. Read history.
@@monadebata5223 whatever acc. to kkurran 4.97 living in a kkuffar country ( India)is haarram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.
@@monadebata5223They're not criticising the Parsi community, they're just stating the reason behind non inclusion of Parsi refugees from Iran in the law.
If Supreme Court wants to interfere in every affairs then why don't Supreme Court takeover has a government right wing and start ruling instead?
True 100%well said
Yes, meddling in everything and always stepping over boundaries!!
Right u have SC when it against you . Remember SC gave Legitimacy for ram temple case . Then i ,m sure u didn't object to SC ruling
Wrong , SC had no choice but to give it to the Hindus. The evidences were stacked so high that it could find no excuse to delay or deny the truth that was glaring them in face. These evidences were present since decades, only now the SC was asked to stand accountable for the delayment. That compelled them to give the final judgement, otherwise the SC had done a fine job of ignoring it since ages .
SC ruling India = Anti National Opposition ruling India.
Is SC above president and Parliament.
NO
No
no, but certainly not below.
The real question is, is Supreme Court above the will of the citizens and security of the nation.
@@sydneyjay2465 Necessary question is are politicians so well read and intellectual as Supreme court judges 😂 answer is no.. they'll never be especially the actors who won bcoz of fame so judges know what they're doing unlike emotional leaders.
End the collegium system in judiciary.
we need to reform our justice system which is defunct. reform supreme court, judges selection and whole lot of judicial systematic-deseases in this country. Have great respect for J. Saideepak Sir. Weel done News 18.
Why don't judges declare their incomes and assets?? So we all get a glimpse into their personal details when they want others to be forthcoming and open to the public!! If CJI owns a Mercedes, are the SC judges well paid??
In fact
SC now has become totally Anti BJP and Anti Modi institution.
Very biassed in their verdicts in many cases
So true I wish next time when they appoint judge they should check his views Muslims and others. They should check who are pro bjp. If they are pro bjp and anti Muslims then definetly they are qualified as judges and lawyers. Because modi and bjp are our angles who came from heaven to protect us.
Reason enough for the collegium needs to go. Why are most Harvard, Oxford educated people always anti India???
Most of HARVARD ,OXFORD educated literate monsters loose touch with reality of Indian society because they analyse facts with EUROPEAN ADOPTED "MASTERS "EYES .
Another baggage which has to be removed from our JUDICIARY SYSTEM .
Such half baked intellectuals are burden to INDIAN SOCIETY .The HARVARD ,OXFORD groups must be given classes about indian culture based on HINDU SECULARISM .
Read "Snakes in the Ganga"
These institutions are funded by anti India garbage
Because if one has to accepted into the Havard circle ..the person has to have Anti Indian attitude..
You mean anti BJP?
Sai deepak s awesome best judicial explanation have heard up to now
Means u r as dumb as him
The CJI upon request from Mr Kapil Sibal has decided to hear all the petitions from 19th March..and it shows how quick the CJI on such cases..where thousands of cases are pending in SC
Abinav is son of CJI. He is having westeren bent of mind. I am surprising about his foolish narrative. The decision of Govt is depends on countrys security, courts should not interfere. In recent days the courts are interfering in Admn. Is courts are superior to President. The order promulagated by the President is challenged ? Is courts are beyond the authority of President ?
We are given citizenship to the persons who persecuted in Islamic coutries. It is humanitarian aspect.
But some people are critising CAA. I feel these people are pak agents ? Such people should be sent to Pakisthan and they dont have right to stay in India.
i dont know how are they becoming lawyers an average worst student of law also know that equality is among equals, like there are certain privileges for s.c and other groups which are not given to o.c. so what this moron studied
Ya he had the privilege to.study in harward😮
True
A hol ur h g d u
"cOurTs sHoUld noT inTerFerE" 😂😂 You get educated first and then speak😂
Dear me!! Junior appears to be as woke, liberandu and clueless as Senior!! Or more......😂😂
Hopefully, BJP will get rid of the collegium so that Junior is stopped in his tracks to become a privileged judge just because Senior is there!! We need a strong filter system and a proper method of picking and appointing truly deserving candidates as judges!!
Lol u want politicians to pic judges? To give favorable judgement to ruling parties?
@@astlinjCommon sense over wokeness is the need of the hour.
junior chandrachud is more scary
@@astlinjwho said did politicians to pick judges? he said we should change the collegium where judge chooses judge. We can make new process for judge election. By we, i mean, people chosen by us.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 what else can he be
Who wants J Sai Deepak to become CJI one day?? ❤🇮🇳
Me me me
Yes i support J Sai Deepak as CJI
Me❤
Of course
What nonsense. JSD as CJI itseems:’D
People have lost their minds… not knowing who is on the right side and who isn’t.
Article 14 matter for only for Indian not outsider...
Read this u will learn :
Article 14 in Constitution of India
14. Equality before law
The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.
Editorial Comment -Article 14 rejects any type of discrimination based on caste, race, and religion, place of birth or sex. This Article is having a wide ambit and applicability to safeguard the rights of people residing in India.
This article is divided into two parts:
Equality before the Law: This part of the article indicates that all are to be treated equally in the eyes of the law. This is a negative concept as it implies the absence of any privilege in favor of any person. This is a substantive part of the article.
Equal protection of the Laws: This part means that the same law will be applied to all the people equally across the society. This is a positive concept as it expects a positive action from the state. This is a procedural part of article 14.
@@phantomnetwork1217What about the waqt board, the Hindu bill, the temple taxes, the special quotas, the minority privileges. If equality is is before law for everyone, then everything mentioned above should be abolished. And if equality is to be practiced to such an extent in case of citizenship , then borders from all the nations who follow secularism should be removed. Borders are fundamentally against the very nature of art 14 , as it discriminates between PPL and restricts them from entering any place named as a 'country'. Is this your argument ?
Article 14 applies all legal residents of India
article 14 is not absolute in nature...it means you cannot bring article 14 in every contest and it should have a reasonable meanings@@phantomnetwork1217
u true@@Truth_is__Bitter
Realistically, CAA is justified in every aspect. People like DY Chandrachud Jr are rich brats who have not seen ground reality and hence lecture under the presumption of a utopian state at ideal. As a taxpayer in Bengal, today I have Bangladeshis somehow coming and buying property, staying and even going to government colleges over here; don't ask me how. Tax ki baatein toh jaane hi do. If such things are not checked the people of the country become the second class citizens.
We stand by you Jai saideep,your one of the finest intellects,scholars and advocates I have ever seen,emerge victorious. Plz do school half baked Jr.Chandrachud, teach him a lesson that he remembers for life time.
If total equality is reqd every where amend constitution to remove all special provisions to minority trials and also women. Otherwise shut up and not be biased.
preach!❤❤
First Remove this kinda Collegium system in indian Judiciary system .. who cares this paid milords seriously ??
Sai Deepak...such Clarity of thought and articulation...This man is an Angel send to protect the idea of Bharat
Ab court chalayega Desh !! Kahe Democracy ka NANGA NACH kar rahe ho??
Chandrachuda Junior thinks being born in the family of CJI is sole repository of wisdom and knowledge. Any well lettered person knows well that Article 14 is applicable only to persons who are already bonafide citizens of India not to those who wish to avail citizenship of India.
CAA is neither intended nor equipped to deal with persons who already are citizen of India. It's as simple as that/
I do know that " Global Left Ecosystem" is the greatest threat to India and SC is " controlled" by this very " ecosystem"... However, your point is not correct....
Article 14 talks about state not denying equal rights to " person". Here the key word is " person" and do not mention " Citizen". So, you cannot counter this product of " Left ecosystem" by saying it is applicable only to " Indian Citizen"....
kkurran 4.97 -- clearly states that living in a kkuffar country ( india) is hharram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.
No buddy a foreigner coming into India on a valid visa is also given equality treatment.
It is the right of the government to decide who can enter and who cannot enter India. Any person/foreigner who enters secretly without government approval cannot get protection under article 14. The treatment is decided by the government as it seems fit on case to case or certain policy decisions depending on the situation in the best interest of India as a country
@@shanthalakshmi2082 kkurran 4.97 clearly states that living in a kkuffar country ( India) is hharram so mmosslim were not included in a CAA bill.
This is why we need judicial reforms and bloody damn make sure that judges are appointed by the govt and a inclusive body
Chandrachud jr is giving Woke arguments. School debate type. Is he a lawyer ?
the apple does not fall far from the tree. in this case, the rotten apple of a rotten tree.
Grandfather was also rotten. He became CJI by overlooking 3 seniors. Why. Because he supported Indira saying Emergency was justified unlike other 3 judges. Once he became CJI then came the collegium. Then started the muska Chaska service
He is not Chandrachud Jr sir. Pl bear in mind He is the future CJI designate!
When Sai says bharat bharat bharat instead of India, it sends goosebumps
Thank you for pointing out the Nuance Deepakji. When thought process has zero depth like it does in some institutions , Coherence becomes the first casualty
Nobody wants inequality, everybody wants to see equality, but it should not be selective. You cannot quote Article 14 when it comes to CAA and has a differential treatment when it comes to minorities in India.
Even when we know that we have a significant link to this region or when we know for certain that the minorities were mistreated???. So much for minority rights
Listening to Chandrachud Jr., makes it all the more important why the Law and order System of Bharat has to be updated, which includes the appointment of Judges by other Judges ! We need more Brilliant people like Jai Sai Deepak in Bharat !
Hindus need to see these opposers as enemies
Save Hindus being persecuted in our peaceful neighbouring countries
If the son of CJI is openly taking a political stance, it is difficult to see how his father would be impartial. SC verdicts should not be framed by CJI's personal opinion
Collegium system must be done away with .
Can anyone say about waqf act and Hindu temples control by government . Is it equality?
Listening and reading J. Sai Deepak everytime is such a pleasure! Hoping for the 3rd book asap.❤
Now we know why collegium is not repealed..
Baccha bhi kabhi judge banega..
The father's words are mouthed by the son it seems.
Hope Judicial reforms happen before Jr CJI becomes CJI automatically. This is the most critical thing to be addressed in the country. This is urgent for the country.
Greatest programme ever
Nepotism vs Pure Talent❤
Bang on Jai Sai Deepak ji . Thanks for the clarification. You cleared all my cobwebs of mind.
I wish to see Sai Deepak as our law minister 🎉❤
Sc is not above parliament
Is Jr Chandrachur is a proxy for CJI?
Why you didnt call Abhinav to this interview for counter
Rahul Shivshankar doesn't have the balls to do that
Chandrachud jr argument under article 14 in this case shows his legal illiteracy. This is similar to basic structure argument applied these days by Supreme Court on laws which they donot like.
It is scary to think this Jr will become our CJI in the futrue. Which is guarenteed that he will become.
One look at chanachur junior, and you remember that boy at school who would cry and complain to the class teacher when not allowed a window seat. And his father would then throw his weight to ensure that his child always gets the window seat. Guys this is how lame that child
Grows into.
Anti CAA is Anti Bharat
First constitutional amendment and the limitation of interference of SC is must
Deepak is right jr chandrachur is hubris
Beware, this is yet another sample of what kind of future CJI we may end up with.....
Judiciary must be reformed
I don't think there are two sides Rahul one is a liberal, privileged, anti- Bharat parroting what his masters have told him to say and the other is a partriot.
Oh it means a nepokid of judiciary already started the vomit
The son of the CJI is a perfect example how a WOKE should argument. He in the process of countering the CAA forgot India's partition history.
CAA relates to "immigration". Use the word immigration, tell them immigration policies are internal to a country.
Gora is very sensitive to the word Immigration, refugees, and they will shut their mouth once they hear such words.
What a shame.
Son of CJI and another advocate.....fails to understand the law. Even layman like me can clearly understand that art 14 applies only for citizens of Bharath.
and also equality does not mean all are equal, in simple terms it is equality among equals
@@chiragarjun3270 I don't understand why don't these people even attempt to read the provision itself:
>Acc citz act 1955 all kinds people still are eligible to become citizen with approx 11 yrs cooling period...it still stands upright.
>Considering the grave decline of minorities in pre-independent Bharat...we are just accelerating the process for those chosen 6 communities for 6 yrs.
>If we also allow Muslims as well in this(that too dominant communities who choose to break my country and messed up themselves like Pak and Bangla on religion basis)...what's the point. Do we need to allow both prey and predator?
>How the muslims of Bharath are victims here?(NRC is not gonna happen now..that's different topic togather)
>Even lawmakers and we'll educated people itself fail to understand this..what a woke idiots they are.
>Funny part is asking that trans people to be allowed from Pak and Afg 😂. Can you even find one🤌
You’re utterly wrong poor layman. One suggestion for you: find a book called Indian polity by lakshmikant and freaking read properly the chapter on fundamental rights
@@DileepRajaMashapari Sure my dear educated man I will go through Lakshmikanthan rather than following Rajinikanth....but I don't understand....
1.Why do we need to treat aggressor and Victim equally. Allow both pray and predator into our country?
2.Groups like Ahamedias are poineers who have pitched for separate nation based on religious lines. Now all those are so called proud islamic republics, they never stood by their minorities. Now they too want preferential treatment what are you pitching for bro.
3.Looking for trans people in these 3 countries 🤣....the woke imports
4. No victim card called Art 14 comes in when reservations sys prevails, preferential treatment prevails on religious lines .....but something good is happening for other groups there comes art 14.
A foreigner coming into India on a valid visa is also given equality treatment.
It is the right of the government to decide who can enter and who cannot enter India. Any person/foreigner who enters secretly without government approval cannot get protection under article 14. The treatment is decided by the government as it deems fit on case to case or on certain policy decisions depending on the situation in the best interest of India as a country
Kudos to Mr Sai Deepak for explaining the contested law in clear terms😊😊
Hope Jr CJI applies such wisdom in the case of inherited judicial system. Is it a fair procees ? Let him present it to the public
The CJI who has said that RTI is principal right of citizens, which is wrong. How u except about his son.
CAA is a lifeline for those in an existential threat due to severe persecution.
It's based on the merit of the individual seeking acceptance.
India cannot be arm twisted through missing the spirit of CAA.
Roll out CAA right away.
Superb Sanju Verma, they do not have the courage to speak out against. Great points Ms Sanju
Pedigree is seen for Horses and animals, it does not apply for Humans. Just because someone has a pedigree does not mean we need to heed their words.
CJIs should be selected basis voting in parliament
Why are you not covering the Electoral Bond Scam?
I salute Sai Deepak for his fabulous knowledge and humanitarian, nationalist approach.
First of all for any foreigner getting citizenship in India or for that matter in any country where the person is taking asylum is a PRIVILEGE and not a RIGHT. The host country can deny the citizenship entirely based on it's will.
Many many ammendments in our Constitution are required to keep the national interest at the top.
The freedom of speech should be allowed with some raiders.
Discuss about the SBI electoral bonds
JSD is the kind of teacher, i would have loved during my school days.
oh my god, what great backdrop that is being build to destroy the concept of hindu natio.
Excellent J Sai Best Wishes
The reply to the last two point didn't make any sense to me
How did SC give a date quick when lacs of cases are pending for years.
1. A refugee not covered by CAA, is allowed to stay in India and then seek citizenship after a while. No refugee is being thrown out or ill treated just because he is not covered by CAA. In fact, such illegal migrants are enjoying all the privileges of the Indian State and political hospitality!! This preferential treatment for citizenship is due to the peculiar circumstances of the fallout of partition and subsequent mistreatment of minorities by Pakistan, Bangla Desh and Afghanistan along with Gandhi's assurances, Nehru Liqayat Ali Pact etc. 2. Politically, those parties who want to give such accelerated rights to others like Jews, LGBT, or any one can always say that when they come to power, they will amend CAA further and will allow anyone from anywhere in the world to become citizen of India anytime. After all, India is the home to all the persecuted from times immemorial!! But a nationalist BJP Govt will and should NOT.
Great debate. Bold topic. Brilliant arguments.
Declare Hindu Rastra 🙏🏻🚩
aptly addressed the confusion around article 14 and its implications👍
If article 14 is the only basis then why do we have reservations on caste basis
Jr. Chandracood is a fool.
In addition to all this first-rate explanation by J. Sai Deepak, I would implore fellow Indians not to cite the Lautenberg Amendment of the United States. We have no need to abide by foreign standards.
Even if the Lautenberg Amendment had not been there, it would have been no moral obstacle. Our civilizational duty to Hindus is entirely our thing; no one else has any locus standi, parallel example or not.
BASIC PRINCIPLE ON CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF LAW :- CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NORMALLY TAKES THAT LAW IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS . ONUS TO PROVE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAW LIES WITH APPEALENT.
Courts only know to deliver orders, but not keeping the cases in order to deliver justice in time.
Very nicely and precisely put the point across in convoncing manner.i also heard CJI son speaking it conveyed something emotional and very criptic on CAA, but ineer fine content is missed, that being answered very clearly by Sai Deepak.
Sai J Deepak put it in such a simple way, even those unfamiliar with the letter of law would comprehend it.
So, i don't know why the speech of the CJI's son became 'viral' when it was so clearly lacking in substance.
Just goes to show that names, lineage and titles still matter in India.
We should rid ourselves of that affliction first.
Well done, Sai J Deepak ji, as always.👏🏼🙏🏼