He never said or implied this, but distortions are all too common these days. This is the consequence of the विकृति that Mr Savarkar's ideology has brought.
Ashutosh did say like this. While responding to a question he said, in earlier days Hindu Muslim riots even if Muslims killed or raped Hindus, nobody took names, but nowadays media is taking Muslim name. This means if Muslim rapes its ok. He is secular. But if media questions as to why did he rape, then they are communal. According to him even if Muslim does riots, he remains secular, but if media says he was the person who started riots, then media is communal. Understood now??@@MrPeaceGuy54
@@MrPeaceGuy54Savarkar is not विकृत, but the Nehru family labeling him as anti-national and British agent is विकृत. Savarkar was a Hindu, but did not believe in rituals. He faced Kala Pani for 50 years. But still Nehru demeaned him, because Nehru was a Muslim and Sawarkar strongly opposed Muslims, because they killed Hindus. Therefore Nehru family is विकृत and not Sawarkar.
@@ajitnadgouda6079 That was equally applicable. The media usually used to say that there was violence between two communities, which was done to ensure that people unnecessarily did not develop prejudices towards someone. However, nowadays, the media is quite keen to take the name of some people. You can check how a reputable news agency like ANI shared fake news in its hurry to take the name of a particular person, and the same is true for media outlets like OpIndia. None of this implies that someone doing evil is secular or that they should not be questioned. However, their identity is not one-sided.
@@ajitnadgouda6079 No, he did not spend 50 years in prison. He was released and confined to Ratnagiri. I do agree that he was once Veer, but the man who came out of prison (do keep in mind that he deliberately chose the path of violence, and there were others who chose to remain instead of writing six mercy petitions) had been corrupted morally and intellectually. His idea of a Hindu is almost entirely political. As an atheist, he obviously found little value in spirituality. All he did was to conveniently link nationality with a particular religion and then claim that there was another nation that had to be compelled to live in the same territory. Dr Ambedkar rightly called his position "illogical" and "dangerous" for the safety and security of India ('Pakistan, or, The Partition of India'). Mr Savarkar's divisive ideology contributed to the partition of India. While he was busy doing things like conspiring to assassinate the Mahatma, asking the Hindus to help the British during the second World War to crush the Quit India movement, people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru were in prison. Both of them willingly gave up lives of comfort and luxury. Mahatma Gandhi risked his own life to save people in Noakhali and Calcutta, and Pandit Nehru did the same in Delhi. However, Mr Savarkar was not there. Mr Savarkar's ideology will cause unimaginable damage to both Bharat and Sanatana Dharma. While people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru fought for the Vedāntic pluralism of Swami Vivekananda, Mr Savarkar did everything he could to undo it. Sadly, our so-called liberal opposition parties have reduced people like Pandit Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi to mere statues. Their ideas have been neglected in favour of appeasement, corruption, and an unending thirst for power. Mrs Gandhi started all of this, and the rot has not been fixed yet. Nevertheless, it remains my conviction that Mr Savarkar is India's (and Hinduism's) most dangerous विकृति. If we don't wake up, then we will pay a heavy price (if people openly praising Mr Godse, a centuries-old place of worship being demolished in Delhi, young children being encouraged to say hateful things, an RPF constable specifically targeting some people, some immoral individuals being garlanded, and a man in Haridwar openly calling for harming others not being punished for years is not enough). This does not mean that we can ignore the other side. Abrahamic religions do need reforms. But we will not do anything meaningful by becoming what we once opposed. Kabir, Maulana Madani (whose descendant recently spoke about the unity of Allah and Om), Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Raskhan, and Maulana Azad also existed. May you have a good day!
Joke. They are minority by choice. They chose partition. They chose to be jihadis where more. They chose to leave. Noone pushed them out. Just having Muslims in every seat is not secularism We want meritocracy. We want equality, no appeasement. Only meritocracy should rule. Hindus are forced to celebrate all festivals. Do muskims celebrate diwali,holi? Thats secularism. Do muslims say they are Indians first? No. Do muskims respect idols? Hindus say Allah. Will they say bhagwan? Noone can claim any rights on basis of religion. That is secularism. Has anyone heard Owaissi ask hindu voters right of his constituency. He only talks of muslims Muslims. Thats communal. He is communal. No hindu demands rights for being hindu
India has been designated as the most dangerous place for Christian’s with the mass slaughter of Christians in manipur. Don’t forget how Sikhs are labeled khalistanis
He was the easiest of the lot. All of his points could be proven wrong by simple facts and concepts. He never seemed competent to hold up on his arguments even for a minute
WHO IS SHEHZAD??? HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH INDIA ADMIRES HIM, THE AUDIANCE CLAP THEIR HANDS FOR HIM WE ARE SHARING M SHEHZAD'S TESTIMONY WITH EUROPEAN PROFESSORS
@@gyanibaba25 sale jail me chala gaya or bjp ke member jo wrestlers ke protest ke main waja tha o abhi bhi khula ghum raha hai or modi khula ghumkebhi manipur nehi jaraha. Kya andhbhakt hai be tera malik log case huya bolte hai but main jo culprits hai uska kya huya o nehi batata kya
Shahjad what you said is “ Full of Sense, Meaning and Touches the Heart of entire Masses of our country. At par it’s all an Excellent. Jaihind, Jai-BHARAT 🇮🇳🌺🌺🌺🙏
When Bharat is intact and united, we have a Bharat Jodo yatra. Similarly, when Bharat is secular by its nature, some people think it is their duty to make it secular.
Seculism is dying when temple is pay jajiya kar, secularism is dying because 60 percent no. Those who are IAS but have to get 80% are not IAS. Secularism is dying because some government is giving quota based on religion. Secularism is dying because some party is saying that first right on this country is of the Muslim
What is secularism in INDIA ? A secular is such a citizen who openly barks against the Hinduism and comment about the Hindu culture , unfollows the Hindu tradition and finally say Hindu laws are unrealistic 😊 and in spite of being non prosecuted for unwarranted talks, concludes there is no secularism in the country …
Secularism had died in India, when Congress brought in WAQF board act. Secularism had died in the country when to allow a procession doesnt let durga puja to be conducted. Secularism had died in the country when the country allow Rohingya refugees in the country and use them as vote banks. Secularism had died in the country when Bangladeshi muslims are allowed to settle in country and use them as vote banks.
Thanks Sure,🙏🙇 Fir your Super Comment. 🙏🙏 ❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩" OUR NATION'S DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY, IS OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST PRIORITY, FIR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY. 🙏🙏❤🇮🇳🇮🇳" OUR NATION FIRST☝
Whereas any Government's achievements must be highlighted, their failures must also be discussed and questioned. Governments are elected by people and they are accountable. Governments must not bulldoze, rather find consensus in decision making. The mainstream media is not questioning the government for their failures and instead questioning the opposition who have already been ousted by the electorate for their misdeeds. That's the irony.
Tax imposed on temple but not on mosque and churches , temple adminstered by state but mosque and church not....is is secularism? In which secular country WAQF ACT , minority commision used to he happen...minority reservation is the identity of secular state?
(१) भारत हिन्दुओं का देश है ; देश के बंटवारे के बाद जब भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप के मुसलमानों के लिए दो मुस्लिम देश बन सकते हैं ( पश्चिमी और पूर्वी पाकिस्तान ) तो बचा हुआ भारत हिन्दुओं के लिए हिन्दू राष्ट्र क्यों नहीं बनना चाहिए ? (२) देश का बंटवारा two nation theory के आधार पर बना तो भारत को आजादी के तुरंत बाद ही हिन्दू राष्ट्र घोषित होना चाहिए था लेकिन गांधी जी और नेहरु की गलती और उनके मुस्लिम परस्त नीतियों के कारण से ये हो नहीं पाया . (३) लेकिन अब देश के हिन्दू जाग चुके हैं और वह समय आ चुका है इसलिए भारत क्यों सेक्युलर रहे ?
Now I perfectly came to know that..nationalist or proud hindu people are more educated and speak on fact rather these leftist or sickular....there is no logic no fact in ashutosh , riju arguments.....now we more convinced that bjp is doing much better for this country and now the true philosophy of secularism is realizing in India...
@@gauravdey4163look at the U.P where bjp is ruling specialy the great monk...and Bihar is not a cow belt it is totally controlled by lallua corrupt and mullas
@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usDo you know the history of constitution? You think Muslims were allowed in India after partition because of constitution?You think Pakistan was formed because of constitution? Are you delusional?
I'm a Christian from Nagaland and what is wrong in saying Bharat Mata ki jai or Vande mataram? Aren't we indian first, followed by our religion. I am a Christian and I am proud to be indian ❤ Jai Hind
M. Hindu virodhi mansikta is ur secularism. Congress gives 100crores /200cr to church and mosques and taxes temples with 10%tax is ur secularism. Shame on all of you. ❤
Temple money Temple gold is nations wealth. Taken by govt. Used for all citizens. But masjid money is not for all. Which govt has touched it. Which govt has taken money from masjids? How much money comes from church? How much money comes from gurdwara?
This Ashutosh guy is a big joke. There is something terribly wrong with his thought process that he thinks everything is wrong. He generalises events perpetrated by small fringe elements and this is very dangerous.
He is extremely prejudiced and always on an one way street and this speaks volumes for his cussed attitude and we can hardly call him a political analyst.
@@chanakyabharat756 Spot on. Those who are sleeping need to be woken up. They most likely suffer from inferiority mindset. They will never answer: If Hindus are no more a majority, will India still be secular??? They need to answer: There are 57 muslim countries that follow Islamic laws, there is 1 country for Jews, there are 117 countries that lean Christian. Hindus have NONE. Why????
They won’t , because they cannot face truth, the bitter truth. The film Kerala story and Kashmir files threw some light on the peaceful community activities in these states. 3 or 300 doesn’t make much difference ,when innocents become victims of treachery . Only the parents of victim dies , but for the doers it is Jihad in the name of religion. Shama Muhammed though being from Kerala fails to see eye to eye , because religion comes first for them and not innocent girls cheated and thrown into gutter.
@@user-jh9kj5hk8h he should answer first as he wants to remove something that is already included in constitution. So.. why remove the word secularism? You want the nation to include only one religion?
@@ashishdhiwar6226 'secular' term was not present in Original Constitution. It was added during Emergency by 42nd CAA. Similar is the word "socialist'. These are token terms for appeasement, nothing else. If you read Fundamental Rights, DPSPs - you will realize our Constitution already has the essence of being secular and socialist. Also, Originally, certain segments of Constitutional provisions were meant for that purpose -- that too socialist tendencies were in DPSPs, left to govt to implement when appropriate. Forcefully putting them in Preamble is a desperate vote catching attempt. The illusion these terms have created is astounding. Numerous Religion-specific laws have been created and their existence justified by holding these terms to ransom. Wakf Act, Places of Worship Act, Muslim Personal Law and so on. Today distortion has exceeded so much that 'secularism' is loosely translated as of Muslim nature, due to un-counted appeasements.
@@raghvendrasingh9675 *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.* *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan* *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.* *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.* *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.* *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.* *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.* *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.* *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.* *Follow only Science and Humanism.* *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.* *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."* *-Christopher Hitchens* *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."* *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism* *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram* *These poor people, who are so fond of religion, they don't understand that it's the religion, the very religion they're defending, it's that religion that kills people.* *All Humanists are friends of all humanists. Sanatani, Sikh, Christian, Musalman these all are hoax. All these religions and religious identities are fabricated. Find the human in you, and in the other person, even if it's Kaffir or Musalman.* *Leave Religion, accept Humanism. Don't be a Musalman, be a Human.*
Aashutosh is really a visionary Today's right winger will not understand what he quoted that the country is heading to the historical disaster. And every single Indian will pay a heavy price. ❤
Great job Ponawala! Thank you from bottom of my heart to clarify what Secularism really means; it is not the appeasement but equal opportunities for every one.
Ashutosh should speak about the atrocities perpetrated on Hindu women by a certain Shah Jahan and how the secular TMC defended him. This is secularism for Ashutosh.
My question to congress debator. entire parliaments of World have prayers of Sanatan Dharm books whether it's US,uk Germany, middle East, Australia....
Not to forget!..secularism in fact not dying in INDIA which means still the citizens of India wants to remains the same democracy ideology...So no one or no political party members can change the constitution of India by the undemocratic and unreligious ideologies.As far as the majority votes of secularism is concerns as in the debates show at the conclave,we are proud to be Indians always. Long live secularism INDIA!!...🎉🎉 0:56
THANKS,🙏🙇TO, " INDIA TODAY CONCLAVE " FOR GIVING SUCH A GREAT DEBATE . ❤❤ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🐯🦁🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉🕉🚩🚩" OUR SANATANI NATION'S, DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY " IS OUR FIRST PRIORITY ,& OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST RESPONSIBILITY, FOR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY. " SANATANI HINDU RASHTRA ( BHARAT ) IS THE ONLY ONE COUNTRY , " SAVE OUR HINDU RASHTRA , FROM " TERRORIST " & MAFIA'S ,. " THIS IS MY REQUEST🙏😊 TO, , ALL " PATRIOTIC " CITIZEN'S OF " BHARAT." ( INDIA )🇮🇳❤🇮🇳🙏
Hinduism is polytheistic-pluralistic -religion ,culture and civilization from 1000s of years we have given refuge to Parsi ,Shia Muslim ,jew ,polish christian and many more and defeated two intolerant and hateful bullies and colonizer's and we still remain Hindu rastra.
India was ruled by Muslim invaders for more than 500 plus years. The Cristian invaders for more than 200 years. was the secularism not dying/dead then? We had one party Congress rule after independence for nearly 50 plus years. Was Dictator/autocratic rule was never felt then? the most misunderstood word is secularism and only request the speakers to define Secularism.
Shama.mohammmed..lol..she was thrashed in kerala by congress itself..she asked why women are thrashed in congress and the openly said she is a nobody in congress..hahahah
THE FERVERITY WITH WHICH WE CELEBRATE FESTIVALS TOGETHER FEELING LOVED AND CHERISHING THE TOGETHERNESS OF SEPERATE CULTURES AND BEAUTY OF BEING TOGETHER.
The greatest sign of this country is secular that the side who claimed to be abused have gone to population nos. greater than any Muslim country in the world. Rohingyas, Bangladeshi muslim don't go to Muslim country and they come to India and surprisingly no Muslim from India switch over to Pakistan or Bangladesh. The debate was more political. A gentleman like J.Saideepak would have made wonders of this subject and educated all.
The title (Secularism is dying in India) itself is prejudicial. How can they form that opinion before beginning of the debate? Who are they to decide that the Secularism is dying? The title should be 'Status of Secularism India'
According to Ashutosh a Rapist is secular but if someone asks him why did he rape, then the one who questions is communal.
He never said or implied this, but distortions are all too common these days. This is the consequence of the विकृति that Mr Savarkar's ideology has brought.
Ashutosh did say like this. While responding to a question he said, in earlier days Hindu Muslim riots even if Muslims killed or raped Hindus, nobody took names, but nowadays media is taking Muslim name. This means if Muslim rapes its ok. He is secular. But if media questions as to why did he rape, then they are communal. According to him even if Muslim does riots, he remains secular, but if media says he was the person who started riots, then media is communal. Understood now??@@MrPeaceGuy54
@@MrPeaceGuy54Savarkar is not विकृत, but the Nehru family labeling him as anti-national and British agent is विकृत. Savarkar was a Hindu, but did not believe in rituals. He faced Kala Pani for 50 years. But still Nehru demeaned him, because Nehru was a Muslim and Sawarkar strongly opposed Muslims, because they killed Hindus. Therefore Nehru family is विकृत and not Sawarkar.
@@ajitnadgouda6079 That was equally applicable. The media usually used to say that there was violence between two communities, which was done to ensure that people unnecessarily did not develop prejudices towards someone. However, nowadays, the media is quite keen to take the name of some people. You can check how a reputable news agency like ANI shared fake news in its hurry to take the name of a particular person, and the same is true for media outlets like OpIndia. None of this implies that someone doing evil is secular or that they should not be questioned. However, their identity is not one-sided.
@@ajitnadgouda6079 No, he did not spend 50 years in prison. He was released and confined to Ratnagiri.
I do agree that he was once Veer, but the man who came out of prison (do keep in mind that he deliberately chose the path of violence, and there were others who chose to remain instead of writing six mercy petitions) had been corrupted morally and intellectually. His idea of a Hindu is almost entirely political. As an atheist, he obviously found little value in spirituality. All he did was to conveniently link nationality with a particular religion and then claim that there was another nation that had to be compelled to live in the same territory. Dr Ambedkar rightly called his position "illogical" and "dangerous" for the safety and security of India ('Pakistan, or, The Partition of India').
Mr Savarkar's divisive ideology contributed to the partition of India. While he was busy doing things like conspiring to assassinate the Mahatma, asking the Hindus to help the British during the second World War to crush the Quit India movement, people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru were in prison. Both of them willingly gave up lives of comfort and luxury. Mahatma Gandhi risked his own life to save people in Noakhali and Calcutta, and Pandit Nehru did the same in Delhi. However, Mr Savarkar was not there. Mr Savarkar's ideology will cause unimaginable damage to both Bharat and Sanatana Dharma. While people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru fought for the Vedāntic pluralism of Swami Vivekananda, Mr Savarkar did everything he could to undo it.
Sadly, our so-called liberal opposition parties have reduced people like Pandit Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi to mere statues. Their ideas have been neglected in favour of appeasement, corruption, and an unending thirst for power. Mrs Gandhi started all of this, and the rot has not been fixed yet. Nevertheless, it remains my conviction that Mr Savarkar is India's (and Hinduism's) most dangerous विकृति. If we don't wake up, then we will pay a heavy price (if people openly praising Mr Godse, a centuries-old place of worship being demolished in Delhi, young children being encouraged to say hateful things, an RPF constable specifically targeting some people, some immoral individuals being garlanded, and a man in Haridwar openly calling for harming others not being punished for years is not enough). This does not mean that we can ignore the other side. Abrahamic religions do need reforms. But we will not do anything meaningful by becoming what we once opposed. Kabir, Maulana Madani (whose descendant recently spoke about the unity of Allah and Om), Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Raskhan, and Maulana Azad also existed.
May you have a good day!
Shahzad .... You are too good for man ... All the best for flying career in politics .... India needs Indians like you in national politics
Why do they forget about Buddhism, Jainism, Christian, Sikh etc in religion? Only if one community don't get appeasement then secularism is dead
Joke. They are minority by choice. They chose partition. They chose to be jihadis where more. They chose to leave. Noone pushed them out. Just having Muslims in every seat is not secularism
We want meritocracy. We want equality, no appeasement. Only meritocracy should rule. Hindus are forced to celebrate all festivals. Do muskims celebrate diwali,holi? Thats secularism. Do muslims say they are Indians first? No. Do muskims respect idols? Hindus say Allah. Will they say bhagwan? Noone can claim any rights on basis of religion. That is secularism. Has anyone heard Owaissi ask hindu voters right of his constituency. He only talks of muslims Muslims. Thats communal. He is communal. No hindu demands rights for being hindu
Perfectly said
India has been designated as the most dangerous place for Christian’s with the mass slaughter of Christians in manipur. Don’t forget how Sikhs are labeled khalistanis
According to Indian constitution, Buddhism, Sikh and Jainism are considered Hindu already.
Par buddhist aur jain to hindu hai na
I proud of Sahjad Punawala,aapne sequelar ke surmaon ko dho dala.jai Hind.
The TMC spokesperson should be ashamed of putting allegations against BJP when his party TMC does all that in Bengal !
He was the easiest of the lot. All of his points could be proven wrong by simple facts and concepts. He never seemed competent to hold up on his arguments even for a minute
We ashamed as a bengali
Bjp should be ashamed for what they are doing in Manipur
@@shubhankarhalder9044 you should be ashamed for Manipur
What tmc is doing bjp anti bengali party doing nothing drama
3 comfortable minutes were appropriate for Mr. Shehzad Poonamwala to explain and expose the difference in secularism between Congress and BJP regimes.
WHO IS SHEHZAD??? HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH
INDIA ADMIRES HIM, THE AUDIANCE CLAP THEIR HANDS FOR HIM
WE ARE SHARING M SHEHZAD'S TESTIMONY WITH EUROPEAN PROFESSORS
National spokesperson of bjp
@@fuse8354 THANKS
we appreciate his clear and frank account
Thats how all debates should be well managed and no shouting or cross talking.
Only Sai deepak was enough to debate for secularism is alive.
He'd Be Too Much For Them
Machar marne ke liye kamaan kew laye?
Ya log sirf dharm ke name pe hi debate kar sakta hai . Kam ke nae per koi debate nehi kar sakta Issliye india ka press index itna kharab hai😡😡
@@Delhikabetatu baat karna sandeshkhali me development ka
@@gyanibaba25 sale jail me chala gaya or bjp ke member jo wrestlers ke protest ke main waja tha o abhi bhi khula ghum raha hai or modi khula ghumkebhi manipur nehi jaraha. Kya andhbhakt hai be tera malik log case huya bolte hai but main jo culprits hai uska kya huya o nehi batata kya
Shahjad what you said is “ Full of Sense, Meaning and Touches the Heart of entire Masses of our country. At par it’s all an Excellent. Jaihind, Jai-BHARAT 🇮🇳🌺🌺🌺🙏
Shehzad and Sheila Rashid are the real winners for me
Shezad and Ashutosh
@@bharatdave6288Ashutosh is 1st place from the bottom 😂 😂 😂
only lol 😅😅@@elborrador333
@@elborrador333womp womp…
@@bharatdave6288 Andhabhakta...
Poonawala stole the show. Asserting truth.
Shehzad Poonawala stole the show !! He has to be the winner.
Godi media ki kamai ki tareef karo Jhuth bolke paisa banata hai.
@@ratanbhattacharjee7233kaunsa jhoot?
@@ratanbhattacharjee7233tereko G maartha hai raat ko abdul
@@ratanbhattacharjee7233bro you are ostrich 😂😂😂
Shehzad was good in first part. But I think it would have been better to come up with stats to show it is actually secularism is flourishing in India.
When Bharat is intact and united, we have a Bharat Jodo yatra. Similarly, when Bharat is secular by its nature, some people think it is their duty to make it secular.
Seculism is dying when temple is pay jajiya kar, secularism is dying because 60 percent no. Those who are IAS but have to get 80% are not IAS. Secularism is dying because some government is giving quota based on religion. Secularism is dying because some party is saying that first right on this country is of the Muslim
#FreeHinduTemples
👍👏🏼👏🏼💐‼️
Which party is saying that? Bro its 2024 not 1947.
@@imanand11Are you uneducated… Go and at least do a simple google search, it was said by our ex-prime minister Mr. Manmohan Singh..
@@Karthikeyansundar-rl5ym I dont edorse quota in religion and caste... The current form of Wuota itself is injustice.
What is secularism in INDIA ? A secular is such a citizen who openly barks against the Hinduism and comment about the Hindu culture , unfollows the Hindu tradition and finally say Hindu laws are unrealistic 😊 and in spite of being non prosecuted for unwarranted talks, concludes there is no secularism in the country …
Shehzad rocks...
🤮
As always
he is among top 3-5 political spokespeople across any party today
He is Chona wala
मोदी अपने लिए वीडियो बनाने वालों को 2 लाख रुपए दे रहे हैं मोदी ने लोकतंत्र की हत्या कर दी
Wow what a selection of panel members to defend the point secularism is not dying in Bharat 🇮🇳
Shehzad Poonawala is the best debater❤
He is choona wala
He has brains
A Stooge
@@manzoorahmadlone6552behead him or what???
Mr BLIND Ashutosh.. Junior Pappu.. .. cant you see the same done with Hindus??!!!!
Secularism had died in India, when Congress brought in WAQF board act. Secularism had died in the country when to allow a procession doesnt let durga puja to be conducted. Secularism had died in the country when the country allow Rohingya refugees in the country and use them as vote banks. Secularism had died in the country when Bangladeshi muslims are allowed to settle in country and use them as vote banks.
What About So called RSS which is terrorist organisation!!!
What about your so called RSS that is terrorist organisation ...
Thanks Sure,🙏🙇 Fir your Super Comment. 🙏🙏
❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩" OUR NATION'S DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY, IS OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST PRIORITY, FIR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY. 🙏🙏❤🇮🇳🇮🇳" OUR NATION FIRST☝
I agree.
I agree
Whereas any Government's achievements must be highlighted, their failures must also be discussed and questioned. Governments are elected by people and they are accountable. Governments must not bulldoze, rather find consensus in decision making. The mainstream media is not questioning the government for their failures and instead questioning the opposition who have already been ousted by the electorate for their misdeeds. That's the irony.
Tax imposed on temple but not on mosque and churches , temple adminstered by state but mosque and church not....is is secularism? In which secular country WAQF ACT , minority commision used to he happen...minority reservation is the identity of secular state?
Utopian genre of secularism goinn on..still some complaining about it
C🎉🎉perfect
Their only reply will be Brahmin patriarchy or Andhbhakt and running away. No Liberandu will have answers to your slapping questions.
Did u ever see PM inaugurate mosque or church, but he did for ram madir , so securlism don't apply there
@@unknown00808
I don't know...
Is a non Muslim allowed to inaugurate a mosque? (Curious. Not trying to prove a point.)
(१) भारत हिन्दुओं का देश है ; देश के बंटवारे के बाद जब भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप के मुसलमानों के लिए दो मुस्लिम देश बन सकते हैं ( पश्चिमी और पूर्वी पाकिस्तान ) तो बचा हुआ भारत हिन्दुओं के लिए हिन्दू राष्ट्र क्यों नहीं बनना चाहिए ? (२) देश का बंटवारा two nation theory के आधार पर बना तो भारत को आजादी के तुरंत बाद ही हिन्दू राष्ट्र घोषित होना चाहिए था लेकिन गांधी जी और नेहरु की गलती और उनके मुस्लिम परस्त नीतियों के कारण से ये हो नहीं पाया . (३) लेकिन अब देश के हिन्दू जाग चुके हैं और वह समय आ चुका है इसलिए भारत क्यों सेक्युलर रहे ?
इस debate को shehzad, शेहला rasheed ने जीत लिया...fact और logic पर बात रखी...जबकि कोंग्रेसी ने सिर्फ bla बला कुछ भी...
ticket chahiye 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm totally agree with you 👍
@@sumantkumar7079Haan, de
Now I perfectly came to know that..nationalist or proud hindu people are more educated and speak on fact rather these leftist or sickular....there is no logic no fact in ashutosh , riju arguments.....now we more convinced that bjp is doing much better for this country and now the true philosophy of secularism is realizing in India...
LeLis can't debate, they can only say Andhbhakt when someone calls them out and feel proud of their stupidity.
Truly 💯
We don't need this we have our bengali nationalism
@@gauravdey4163😂
Then Brother say Abki bar 400 par 😊🔥
"Is Bharath Maatha Ki Jai" is unsecular? What type of mentality is this?
Shehzad bhai is on fire, as always.
He is always logical
Its a fact that secularism is alive.
Bengal is the most communal place in India today .
Bengal = Bhikaris
There's one more state in the South.
@@atokimruk937 up bihar cow belts is bimaru bikhari producing population
@@gauravdey4163 did Momtaz bano kept her ROZA today?
@@gauravdey4163look at the U.P where bjp is ruling specialy the great monk...and Bihar is not a cow belt it is totally controlled by lallua corrupt and mullas
When they are in minority they ask for secularism. Majority me aate hi Islamic mulk chahiye.
Secularism will be alive till Hindu is in majority.
It is because of Hindus that we can talk about secularism in India otherwise which other religion allows this much liberty.
My dirty mind thoughts about 57 Muslim countries and their secularism 🤣🤣🤣
I thought it was the constitution of India..
@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usDo you know the history of constitution? You think Muslims were allowed in India after partition because of constitution?You think Pakistan was formed because of constitution? Are you delusional?
@@funfactz5605 Bro chill..I was just talking about this debate..
@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usconvert detected opinion rejected!
Earlier the "appeasement secularism" ends, the better. Let equality prevail
Shahzad is one of the finest speakers and staunch nationalist
I'm a Christian from Nagaland and what is wrong in saying Bharat Mata ki jai or Vande mataram? Aren't we indian first, followed by our religion.
I am a Christian and I am proud to be indian ❤ Jai Hind
M. Hindu virodhi mansikta is ur secularism. Congress gives 100crores /200cr to church and mosques and taxes temples with 10%tax is ur secularism. Shame on all of you. ❤
Temple money
Temple gold is nations wealth. Taken by govt. Used for all citizens. But masjid money is not for all. Which govt has touched it. Which govt has taken money from masjids? How much money comes from church? How much money comes from gurdwara?
@@induchopra3014 to church or masjid ko kyu de rahe hai 😡🤬😠 baap ka maal hai
Very rightly said Shehzad!
Without lust islam dust 😂😂😂
@@faultlines3399 54 year old Mohammed rap^d 6 year old Ayesha
#exmuslim sahil youtube Chanel
@@faultlines3399 6 saal ki bachchi se 🤡🤡🤡
#exmuslim sahil
@@faultlines3399what hard evidence you have that God actually spoke to Muhammad? 😂 flying donkey?
@@faultlines3399
?
@@faultlines3399 hinduism precedes ram by thousands of years. pisslam started with popat
Swapan Dasgupta go and check in Europe what is secularism. Then you will realize.
Shehla, Shehzad & Sengupta totally decimated the "Secularism is dying gang".
This Ashutosh guy is a big joke. There is something terribly wrong with his thought process that he thinks everything is wrong. He generalises events perpetrated by small fringe elements and this is very dangerous.
He is extremely prejudiced and always on an one way street and this speaks volumes for his cussed attitude and we can hardly call him a political analyst.
There are crores of such people😂😂
😂😂
Even Delhi mayor Kejriwal couldn't stand Ashutosh, kicked him out of AAP😂😂
@@chanakyabharat756 Spot on. Those who are sleeping need to be woken up. They most likely suffer from inferiority mindset. They will never answer: If Hindus are no more a majority, will India still be secular??? They need to answer: There are 57 muslim countries that follow Islamic laws, there is 1 country for Jews, there are 117 countries that lean Christian. Hindus have NONE. Why????
Thank you Shehzad Poonawala ❤
Why don't the Ashutosh and company discuss Kashmir , Kerala, Bengal killings
They won’t , because they cannot face truth, the bitter truth. The film Kerala story and Kashmir files threw some light on the peaceful community activities in these states. 3 or 300 doesn’t make much difference ,when innocents become victims of treachery . Only the parents of victim dies , but for the doers it is Jihad in the name of religion. Shama Muhammed though being from Kerala fails to see eye to eye , because religion comes first for them and not innocent girls cheated and thrown into gutter.
First speaker from WB doesn't know what is happening in the name of secularism in his own state. Very funny chap.
Bro Sai Deepak and Ranganath sir would have demolished tmc and Ashutosh
Sai ok but Ranganath is bluff
Captains for the finals😅
@@chanakyabharat756 How is he a bluff, please elaborate...🤔🤔
Secularism is dying only for india today
What is secularism? Will u please define?😂
If secularism is dying it’s only because the tolerant are tired of appeasement of the intolerants.
@@atulkumar-pr4yosecularism is majority ko chutiya bnao
Sahi kaha bhai, Rahul doesn't seem to be very happy with the result. 😂😂
The word Secularism should be removed from constitution by Members of Parliament
why
Why not
@@user-jh9kj5hk8h he should answer first as he wants to remove something that is already included in constitution. So.. why remove the word secularism? You want the nation to include only one religion?
@@ashishdhiwar6226 'secular' term was not present in Original Constitution. It was added during Emergency by 42nd CAA. Similar is the word "socialist'.
These are token terms for appeasement, nothing else. If you read Fundamental Rights, DPSPs - you will realize our Constitution already has the essence of being secular and socialist.
Also, Originally, certain segments of Constitutional provisions were meant for that purpose -- that too socialist tendencies were in DPSPs, left to govt to implement when appropriate. Forcefully putting them in Preamble is a desperate vote catching attempt.
The illusion these terms have created is astounding. Numerous Religion-specific laws have been created and their existence justified by holding these terms to ransom. Wakf Act, Places of Worship Act, Muslim Personal Law and so on.
Today distortion has exceeded so much that 'secularism' is loosely translated as of Muslim nature, due to un-counted appeasements.
@@raghvendrasingh9675 *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.*
*Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan*
*Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.*
*Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.*
*There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.*
*No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.*
*All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.*
*All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.*
*Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.*
*Follow only Science and Humanism.*
*Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.*
*"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."*
*-Christopher Hitchens*
*"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."*
*-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism*
*Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram*
*These poor people, who are so fond of religion, they don't understand that it's the religion, the very religion they're defending, it's that religion that kills people.*
*All Humanists are friends of all humanists. Sanatani, Sikh, Christian, Musalman these all are hoax. All these religions and religious identities are fabricated. Find the human in you, and in the other person, even if it's Kaffir or Musalman.*
*Leave Religion, accept Humanism. Don't be a Musalman, be a Human.*
So many Rahuls are in Support for Secularism😂😂😂😂
Kharghosh anchor👍
15:18 it is true
Godse was a patriot. Nobody can raise question about that.
And he wasn't a terrorist but at max a murderer.
Godse was a terrorist. This is known to Everyone, nothing new.
Missing Sai Deepak 😂😂😂😂😂
All Opposition Debater Vs Shehjad.
Shehjad just Nailed everyone.
TMC spokesperson was spitting absolutely shit, how they are talking about secularism when all they do is for one community
Aashutosh is really a visionary
Today's right winger will not understand what he quoted that the country is heading to the historical disaster. And every single Indian will pay a heavy price.
❤
For him yes, disaster, for us golden era.
@@JkKingclan what do you mean
Great job Ponawala! Thank you from bottom of my heart to clarify what Secularism really means; it is not the appeasement but equal opportunities for every one.
जय 🙏श्रीराम
Hindol and Shehzad by far the best debaters by a long distance…congress spokesperson needs a lot of practice.
It's not about good or bad debaters when you don't have anything truth to say.
Ashutosh should speak about the atrocities perpetrated on Hindu women by a certain Shah Jahan and how the secular TMC defended him. This is secularism for Ashutosh.
Sai deepak supposed to be there ,, then you would know this term Secularism invented from where and inserted in india,, this is word used by church
Yupp he would have raised the bar of this debate really highh
My question to congress debator. entire parliaments of World have prayers of Sanatan Dharm books whether it's US,uk Germany, middle East, Australia....
Great debate by Shazaad . Great to listen to this program.Always goodluck for BJP.
Wow Shehzad wow👍🏻👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Hindus in the debate fighting for Muslims and muslims fighting for Hindus, how much more secularism you want to see.
Poonawalla beautiful speak
Yay!! shehzaaad!!!!❤
Exactly
Not to forget!..secularism in fact not dying in INDIA which means still the citizens of India wants to remains the same democracy ideology...So no one or no political party members can change the constitution of India by the undemocratic and unreligious ideologies.As far as the majority votes of secularism is concerns as in the debates show at the conclave,we are proud to be Indians always. Long live secularism INDIA!!...🎉🎉 0:56
Debate is the culture of Bharat, thanks for organizing it.
Shehzad Poonawala is the best speaker!
Bravo! India Today is certainly setting standards for debate.
THANKS,🙏🙇TO, " INDIA TODAY CONCLAVE " FOR GIVING SUCH A GREAT DEBATE .
❤❤ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🐯🦁🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉🕉🚩🚩" OUR SANATANI NATION'S, DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY " IS OUR FIRST PRIORITY ,& OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST RESPONSIBILITY, FOR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY.
" SANATANI HINDU RASHTRA ( BHARAT ) IS THE ONLY ONE COUNTRY , " SAVE OUR HINDU RASHTRA , FROM " TERRORIST " & MAFIA'S ,.
" THIS IS MY REQUEST🙏😊 TO,
, ALL " PATRIOTIC " CITIZEN'S OF " BHARAT." ( INDIA )🇮🇳❤🇮🇳🙏
Secularism is not dying but definitely muslim appeasement nd vote bank politics dying
They were outstanding both...... Sheila and shehzad❤❤
Shehzad wow wow just wow👏👏
Hindu Jago Congress hatao Desh bachao please 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩🚩
Shehzaad and sheila killed it with their arguments....❤
Best debate and Shehzad and Sheila ❤is best🎉
Hinduism is polytheistic-pluralistic -religion ,culture and civilization from 1000s of years we have given refuge to Parsi ,Shia Muslim ,jew ,polish christian and many more and defeated two intolerant and hateful bullies and colonizer's and we still remain Hindu rastra.
Yes 💪✊😌🥰🇮🇳✊❤️🕉️
Shehzad pulled debate to a big win itself is a sign of secularism in Bharat 🚩
27:30
Shezada Poonawalla ji
🔥 🔥 🔥
agenda chalu rakho, modiji hi aa rahe hai, advance me badhaiya bhartiya janta
sehzad wins the days thats it
They are debating secularism is dyning in india infront of hindus 😂😂.
Hinduo kuch to jago thoda sa 😂
Shehjad and Shehla has won the Debate. Opposition has not a single good debater.
Secularism is equal to Muslim appeasement
Ponanawa rock🤘 and team is also brilliant👍
If u think secularism is dying ,this debate will not occur
SECULARISM IS STRONGLY ALIVE IN BHARAT BECAUSE HINDUS ARE NOT LEAVING BHARAT LEAVING THEIR WIFE AND DAUGHERS BACK!
AND ASHUTOSH IS NOT CRYING YET!
Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏
Jai Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏
Shama is taking out her personal anger😅😅😅😅😅
India was ruled by Muslim invaders for more than 500 plus years. The Cristian invaders for more than 200 years. was the secularism not dying/dead then? We had one party Congress rule after independence for nearly 50 plus years. Was
Dictator/autocratic rule was never felt then? the most misunderstood word is secularism and only request the speakers to define Secularism.
Shama.mohammmed..lol..she was thrashed in kerala by congress itself..she asked why women are thrashed in congress and the openly said she is a nobody in congress..hahahah
HA U PRAH...
Secularism is dying what they are debating liberally & saying secularism is dying is hypocrisy 😂😂 khangress nahi sudhrega
Shama Muhammad pointed out the real subject.🎉
Secularism is dying in India...
if dead can´t to organiz like this conclave debate in future
Secularism ka matlb hi bta do bhai 🙂
😂🎉@@mayankindian3750
THE FERVERITY WITH WHICH WE CELEBRATE FESTIVALS TOGETHER
FEELING LOVED AND CHERISHING
THE TOGETHERNESS OF SEPERATE CULTURES AND BEAUTY OF BEING TOGETHER.
The greatest sign of this country is secular that the side who claimed to be abused have gone to population nos. greater than any Muslim country in the world. Rohingyas, Bangladeshi muslim don't go to Muslim country and they come to India and surprisingly no Muslim from India switch over to Pakistan or Bangladesh. The debate was more political. A gentleman like J.Saideepak would have made wonders of this subject and educated all.
The title (Secularism is dying in India) itself is prejudicial. How can they form that opinion before beginning of the debate? Who are they to decide that the Secularism is dying? The title should be 'Status of Secularism India'
Shehzad The best
Shehzhad left others by miles.. Congress lost him
Shahzad is brilliant! Shella is equally talented,