India Today Conclave 2024: 'Secularism Is Dying in India' | The Conclave Debate

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มี.ค. 2024
  • Is secularism dying in India? Do we need to redefine secular values in the country? Watch this fiery debate between panellists from across fields at India Today Conclave 2024
    The India Today Conclave - India's premier thought forum - is entering its 21st year. Over the next two days, Conclave 2024 will bring together visionaries, leaders, and luminaries from across the globe under one roof to delve into the essence of 'Brand Bharat: An Assertive Nation in an Uncertain World'. Spanning over two decades, the conclave has established itself as a premier forum for dissecting the complexities of our times, stimulating intellectual debates, and seeding the ideas that shape our world.
    #IndiaTodayConclave24 #indiatodayconclave #indiatoday #indiatodaylive #SaketGokale #Ashutosh#ShamaMohamed #ShehzadPoonawalla #HindolSengupta #ShehlaRashid #AryamaSundaram #SwapanDasgupta #DeepakVerma
    SUBSCRIBE to India Today Conclave so you don't miss any session and make sure to enable Push Notifications, so you'll never miss a new video. All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!

ความคิดเห็น • 1.8K

  • @ajitnadgouda6079
    @ajitnadgouda6079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +318

    According to Ashutosh a Rapist is secular but if someone asks him why did he rape, then the one who questions is communal.

    • @MrPeaceGuy54
      @MrPeaceGuy54 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      He never said or implied this, but distortions are all too common these days. This is the consequence of the विकृति that Mr Savarkar's ideology has brought.

    • @ajitnadgouda6079
      @ajitnadgouda6079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Ashutosh did say like this. While responding to a question he said, in earlier days Hindu Muslim riots even if Muslims killed or raped Hindus, nobody took names, but nowadays media is taking Muslim name. This means if Muslim rapes its ok. He is secular. But if media questions as to why did he rape, then they are communal. According to him even if Muslim does riots, he remains secular, but if media says he was the person who started riots, then media is communal. Understood now??​@@MrPeaceGuy54

    • @ajitnadgouda6079
      @ajitnadgouda6079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@MrPeaceGuy54Savarkar is not विकृत, but the Nehru family labeling him as anti-national and British agent is विकृत. Savarkar was a Hindu, but did not believe in rituals. He faced Kala Pani for 50 years. But still Nehru demeaned him, because Nehru was a Muslim and Sawarkar strongly opposed Muslims, because they killed Hindus. Therefore Nehru family is विकृत and not Sawarkar.

    • @MrPeaceGuy54
      @MrPeaceGuy54 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ajitnadgouda6079 That was equally applicable. The media usually used to say that there was violence between two communities, which was done to ensure that people unnecessarily did not develop prejudices towards someone. However, nowadays, the media is quite keen to take the name of some people. You can check how a reputable news agency like ANI shared fake news in its hurry to take the name of a particular person, and the same is true for media outlets like OpIndia. None of this implies that someone doing evil is secular or that they should not be questioned. However, their identity is not one-sided.

    • @MrPeaceGuy54
      @MrPeaceGuy54 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ajitnadgouda6079 No, he did not spend 50 years in prison. He was released and confined to Ratnagiri.
      I do agree that he was once Veer, but the man who came out of prison (do keep in mind that he deliberately chose the path of violence, and there were others who chose to remain instead of writing six mercy petitions) had been corrupted morally and intellectually. His idea of a Hindu is almost entirely political. As an atheist, he obviously found little value in spirituality. All he did was to conveniently link nationality with a particular religion and then claim that there was another nation that had to be compelled to live in the same territory. Dr Ambedkar rightly called his position "illogical" and "dangerous" for the safety and security of India ('Pakistan, or, The Partition of India').
      Mr Savarkar's divisive ideology contributed to the partition of India. While he was busy doing things like conspiring to assassinate the Mahatma, asking the Hindus to help the British during the second World War to crush the Quit India movement, people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru were in prison. Both of them willingly gave up lives of comfort and luxury. Mahatma Gandhi risked his own life to save people in Noakhali and Calcutta, and Pandit Nehru did the same in Delhi. However, Mr Savarkar was not there. Mr Savarkar's ideology will cause unimaginable damage to both Bharat and Sanatana Dharma. While people like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru fought for the Vedāntic pluralism of Swami Vivekananda, Mr Savarkar did everything he could to undo it.
      Sadly, our so-called liberal opposition parties have reduced people like Pandit Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi to mere statues. Their ideas have been neglected in favour of appeasement, corruption, and an unending thirst for power. Mrs Gandhi started all of this, and the rot has not been fixed yet. Nevertheless, it remains my conviction that Mr Savarkar is India's (and Hinduism's) most dangerous विकृति. If we don't wake up, then we will pay a heavy price (if people openly praising Mr Godse, a centuries-old place of worship being demolished in Delhi, young children being encouraged to say hateful things, an RPF constable specifically targeting some people, some immoral individuals being garlanded, and a man in Haridwar openly calling for harming others not being punished for years is not enough). This does not mean that we can ignore the other side. Abrahamic religions do need reforms. But we will not do anything meaningful by becoming what we once opposed. Kabir, Maulana Madani (whose descendant recently spoke about the unity of Allah and Om), Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Raskhan, and Maulana Azad also existed.
      May you have a good day!

  • @tejaspb24
    @tejaspb24 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +390

    Only Sai deepak was enough to debate for secularism is alive.

    • @tanaystudies
      @tanaystudies 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      He'd Be Too Much For Them

    • @Mr_x957
      @Mr_x957 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Machar marne ke liye kamaan kew laye?

    • @RoniDattaChoudhury
      @RoniDattaChoudhury 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ya log sirf dharm ke name pe hi debate kar sakta hai . Kam ke nae per koi debate nehi kar sakta Issliye india ka press index itna kharab hai😡😡

    • @gyanibaba25
      @gyanibaba25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@RoniDattaChoudhurytu baat karna sandeshkhali me development ka

    • @RoniDattaChoudhury
      @RoniDattaChoudhury 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@gyanibaba25 sale jail me chala gaya or bjp ke member jo wrestlers ke protest ke main waja tha o abhi bhi khula ghum raha hai or modi khula ghumkebhi manipur nehi jaraha. Kya andhbhakt hai be tera malik log case huya bolte hai but main jo culprits hai uska kya huya o nehi batata kya

  • @rajibbiswas1843
    @rajibbiswas1843 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Shahzad .... You are too good for man ... All the best for flying career in politics .... India needs Indians like you in national politics

  • @bindusingh9722
    @bindusingh9722 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I proud of Sahjad Punawala,aapne sequelar ke surmaon ko dho dala.jai Hind.

  • @cherry316316
    @cherry316316 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +153

    Why do they forget about Buddhism, Jainism, Christian, Sikh etc in religion? Only if one community don't get appeasement then secularism is dead

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Joke. They are minority by choice. They chose partition. They chose to be jihadis where more. They chose to leave. Noone pushed them out. Just having Muslims in every seat is not secularism
      We want meritocracy. We want equality, no appeasement. Only meritocracy should rule. Hindus are forced to celebrate all festivals. Do muskims celebrate diwali,holi? Thats secularism. Do muslims say they are Indians first? No. Do muskims respect idols? Hindus say Allah. Will they say bhagwan? Noone can claim any rights on basis of religion. That is secularism. Has anyone heard Owaissi ask hindu voters right of his constituency. He only talks of muslims Muslims. Thats communal. He is communal. No hindu demands rights for being hindu

    • @rajatsingh1375
      @rajatsingh1375 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Perfectly said

    • @sm8315
      @sm8315 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      India has been designated as the most dangerous place for Christian’s with the mass slaughter of Christians in manipur. Don’t forget how Sikhs are labeled khalistanis

    • @tarunvarshney
      @tarunvarshney หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      According to Indian constitution, Buddhism, Sikh and Jainism are considered Hindu already.

    • @pushpeh57
      @pushpeh57 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Par buddhist aur jain to hindu hai na

  • @DreamIAS-lc2ul
    @DreamIAS-lc2ul 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +392

    Shehzad rocks...

    • @user-mh2jp5wn1s
      @user-mh2jp5wn1s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      🤮

    • @user-py7qt5le4y
      @user-py7qt5le4y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      As always

    • @elborrador333
      @elborrador333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he is among top 3-5 political spokespeople across any party today

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He is Chona wala

    • @Jvmlpcvr
      @Jvmlpcvr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      मोदी अपने लिए वीडियो बनाने वालों को 2 लाख रुपए दे रहे हैं मोदी ने लोकतंत्र की हत्या कर दी

  • @Fitsapiens007
    @Fitsapiens007 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Thats how all debates should be well managed and no shouting or cross talking.

  • @satishdoddaballapurchandra9558
    @satishdoddaballapurchandra9558 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    3 comfortable minutes were appropriate for Mr. Shehzad Poonamwala to explain and expose the difference in secularism between Congress and BJP regimes.

  • @user-mz1mm2gk4d
    @user-mz1mm2gk4d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +243

    The TMC spokesperson should be ashamed of putting allegations against BJP when his party TMC does all that in Bengal !

    • @aayushhh95
      @aayushhh95 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He was the easiest of the lot. All of his points could be proven wrong by simple facts and concepts. He never seemed competent to hold up on his arguments even for a minute

    • @shubhankarhalder9044
      @shubhankarhalder9044 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      We ashamed as a bengali

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bjp should be ashamed for what they are doing in Manipur

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@shubhankarhalder9044 you should be ashamed for Manipur

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What tmc is doing bjp anti bengali party doing nothing drama

  • @BESMARTER-il4kn
    @BESMARTER-il4kn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +140

    WHO IS SHEHZAD??? HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH
    INDIA ADMIRES HIM, THE AUDIANCE CLAP THEIR HANDS FOR HIM
    WE ARE SHARING M SHEHZAD'S TESTIMONY WITH EUROPEAN PROFESSORS

    • @fuse8354
      @fuse8354 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      National spokesperson of bjp

    • @BESMARTER-il4kn
      @BESMARTER-il4kn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@fuse8354 THANKS
      we appreciate his clear and frank account

  • @prakashindorkar4255
    @prakashindorkar4255 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Shahjad what you said is “ Full of Sense, Meaning and Touches the Heart of entire Masses of our country. At par it’s all an Excellent. Jaihind, Jai-BHARAT 🇮🇳🌺🌺🌺🙏

  • @rahilsanjayjain601
    @rahilsanjayjain601 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Shehzaad and sheila killed it with their arguments....❤

  • @manojsharma5837
    @manojsharma5837 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +386

    Shehzad and Sheila Rashid are the real winners for me

    • @bharatdave6288
      @bharatdave6288 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shezad and Ashutosh

    • @elborrador333
      @elborrador333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@bharatdave6288Ashutosh is 1st place from the bottom 😂 😂 😂

    • @striker4072
      @striker4072 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      only lol 😅😅​@@elborrador333

    • @jaishks
      @jaishks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elborrador333womp womp…

    • @ajitnadgouda6079
      @ajitnadgouda6079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bharatdave6288 Andhabhakta...

  • @devendrapandey6047
    @devendrapandey6047 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Shehzad bhai is on fire, as always.

    • @bharatdave6288
      @bharatdave6288 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He is always logical

  • @user-xp5by3jd9g
    @user-xp5by3jd9g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    When Bharat is intact and united, we have a Bharat Jodo yatra. Similarly, when Bharat is secular by its nature, some people think it is their duty to make it secular.

  • @santoshkarekar9357
    @santoshkarekar9357 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow what a selection of panel members to defend the point secularism is not dying in Bharat 🇮🇳

  • @indiasane9420
    @indiasane9420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +251

    Shehzad Poonawala stole the show !! He has to be the winner.

    • @ratanbhattacharjee7233
      @ratanbhattacharjee7233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Godi media ki kamai ki tareef karo Jhuth bolke paisa banata hai.

    • @abrakidabra
      @abrakidabra 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@ratanbhattacharjee7233kaunsa jhoot?

    • @SrcTrustMeBro
      @SrcTrustMeBro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ratanbhattacharjee7233tereko G maartha hai raat ko abdul

    • @Sam-wt7bn
      @Sam-wt7bn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ratanbhattacharjee7233bro you are ostrich 😂😂😂

    • @sarvajanhitaay
      @sarvajanhitaay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shehzad was good in first part. But I think it would have been better to come up with stats to show it is actually secularism is flourishing in India.

  • @ankitkaran_
    @ankitkaran_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +152

    Shehzad Poonawala is the best debater❤

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is choona wala

    • @SaritaSingh-oy8vp
      @SaritaSingh-oy8vp หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He has brains

    • @manzoorahmadlone6552
      @manzoorahmadlone6552 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A Stooge

    • @KB-ci4hg
      @KB-ci4hg หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@manzoorahmadlone6552behead him or what???

  • @malladidattatreya9492
    @malladidattatreya9492 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Its a fact that secularism is alive.

  • @kprajendran-oz9bc
    @kprajendran-oz9bc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Earlier the "appeasement secularism" ends, the better. Let equality prevail

  • @nationalistsanghi5897
    @nationalistsanghi5897 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

    Tax imposed on temple but not on mosque and churches , temple adminstered by state but mosque and church not....is is secularism? In which secular country WAQF ACT , minority commision used to he happen...minority reservation is the identity of secular state?

    • @Avant-garde1611
      @Avant-garde1611 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Utopian genre of secularism goinn on..still some complaining about it

    • @Biztalkcontrolcenter
      @Biztalkcontrolcenter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      C🎉🎉perfect

    • @thiruvetti
      @thiruvetti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Their only reply will be Brahmin patriarchy or Andhbhakt and running away. No Liberandu will have answers to your slapping questions.

    • @unknown00808
      @unknown00808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did u ever see PM inaugurate mosque or church, but he did for ram madir , so securlism don't apply there

    • @yourstrulytk12
      @yourstrulytk12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@unknown00808
      I don't know...
      Is a non Muslim allowed to inaugurate a mosque? (Curious. Not trying to prove a point.)

  • @PrateekUmrao-dm5dy
    @PrateekUmrao-dm5dy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +150

    Seculism is dying when temple is pay jajiya kar, secularism is dying because 60 percent no. Those who are IAS but have to get 80% are not IAS. Secularism is dying because some government is giving quota based on religion. Secularism is dying because some party is saying that first right on this country is of the Muslim

    • @BharathiFromSouth
      @BharathiFromSouth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      #FreeHinduTemples

    • @saratsaratchandran3085
      @saratsaratchandran3085 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      👍👏🏼👏🏼💐‼️

    • @imanand11
      @imanand11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which party is saying that? Bro its 2024 not 1947.

    • @Karthikeyansundar-rl5ym
      @Karthikeyansundar-rl5ym 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@imanand11Are you uneducated… Go and at least do a simple google search, it was said by our ex-prime minister Mr. Manmohan Singh..

    • @imanand11
      @imanand11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Karthikeyansundar-rl5ym I dont edorse quota in religion and caste... The current form of Wuota itself is injustice.

  • @vgkashyap6680
    @vgkashyap6680 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What is secularism in INDIA ? A secular is such a citizen who openly barks against the Hinduism and comment about the Hindu culture , unfollows the Hindu tradition and finally say Hindu laws are unrealistic 😊 and in spite of being non prosecuted for unwarranted talks, concludes there is no secularism in the country …

  • @rahulpathania8846
    @rahulpathania8846 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Missing Sai Deepak 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @DreamIAS-lc2ul
    @DreamIAS-lc2ul 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +207

    Now I perfectly came to know that..nationalist or proud hindu people are more educated and speak on fact rather these leftist or sickular....there is no logic no fact in ashutosh , riju arguments.....now we more convinced that bjp is doing much better for this country and now the true philosophy of secularism is realizing in India...

    • @arthuranydonuts923
      @arthuranydonuts923 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LeLis can't debate, they can only say Andhbhakt when someone calls them out and feel proud of their stupidity.

    • @Avant-garde1611
      @Avant-garde1611 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Truly 💯

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We don't need this we have our bengali nationalism

    • @mayankjhunjhunwala2625
      @mayankjhunjhunwala2625 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@gauravdey4163😂

    • @mmsdesigners8463
      @mmsdesigners8463 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Then Brother say Abki bar 400 par 😊🔥

  • @dharamwwe
    @dharamwwe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Shahzad is one of the finest speakers and staunch nationalist

    • @ddb0831
      @ddb0831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏

  • @venkatavendidandi207
    @venkatavendidandi207 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Is Bharath Maatha Ki Jai" is unsecular? What type of mentality is this?

  • @nepurohit8951
    @nepurohit8951 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    जय 🙏श्रीराम

  • @ashokbraroo8845
    @ashokbraroo8845 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    M. Hindu virodhi mansikta is ur secularism. Congress gives 100crores /200cr to church and mosques and taxes temples with 10%tax is ur secularism. Shame on all of you. ❤

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Temple money
      Temple gold is nations wealth. Taken by govt. Used for all citizens. But masjid money is not for all. Which govt has touched it. Which govt has taken money from masjids? How much money comes from church? How much money comes from gurdwara?

    • @mayankindian3750
      @mayankindian3750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@induchopra3014 to church or masjid ko kyu de rahe hai 😡🤬😠 baap ka maal hai

  • @asutosh413
    @asutosh413 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +138

    Bengal is the most communal place in India today .

    • @atokimruk937
      @atokimruk937 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Bengal = Bhikaris

    • @cosmoshercules8436
      @cosmoshercules8436 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      There's one more state in the South.

    • @gauravdey4163
      @gauravdey4163 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@atokimruk937 up bihar cow belts is bimaru bikhari producing population

    • @niceboy9806
      @niceboy9806 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@gauravdey4163 did Momtaz bano kept her ROZA today?

    • @gyanibaba25
      @gyanibaba25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@gauravdey4163look at the U.P where bjp is ruling specialy the great monk...and Bihar is not a cow belt it is totally controlled by lallua corrupt and mullas

  • @boringlife7745
    @boringlife7745 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why only India was forced to become secular?

  • @BHALAMAN
    @BHALAMAN 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When they are in minority they ask for secularism. Majority me aate hi Islamic mulk chahiye.
    Secularism will be alive till Hindu is in majority.

  • @rajv9921
    @rajv9921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Secularism had died in India, when Congress brought in WAQF board act. Secularism had died in the country when to allow a procession doesnt let durga puja to be conducted. Secularism had died in the country when the country allow Rohingya refugees in the country and use them as vote banks. Secularism had died in the country when Bangladeshi muslims are allowed to settle in country and use them as vote banks.

    • @Zakir-Raza
      @Zakir-Raza หลายเดือนก่อน

      What About So called RSS which is terrorist organisation!!!

    • @Zakir-Raza
      @Zakir-Raza หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about your so called RSS that is terrorist organisation ...

    • @user-bb4qt8xo4u
      @user-bb4qt8xo4u หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Sure,🙏🙇 Fir your Super Comment. 🙏🙏
      ❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩" OUR NATION'S DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY, IS OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST PRIORITY, FIR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY. 🙏🙏❤🇮🇳🇮🇳" OUR NATION FIRST☝

    • @t.sudarsanpatro4883
      @t.sudarsanpatro4883 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree.

    • @supermanku2852
      @supermanku2852 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree

  • @arungokulvs
    @arungokulvs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Shehla, Shehzad & Sengupta totally decimated the "Secularism is dying gang".

  • @MayurBKoli
    @MayurBKoli 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ponanawa rock🤘 and team is also brilliant👍

  • @shails98
    @shails98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    It is because of Hindus that we can talk about secularism in India otherwise which other religion allows this much liberty.

    • @shubhankarhalder9044
      @shubhankarhalder9044 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      My dirty mind thoughts about 57 Muslim countries and their secularism 🤣🤣🤣

    • @MohdRiyaz-wp7us
      @MohdRiyaz-wp7us 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought it was the constitution of India..

    • @funfactz5605
      @funfactz5605 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usDo you know the history of constitution? You think Muslims were allowed in India after partition because of constitution?You think Pakistan was formed because of constitution? Are you delusional?

    • @MohdRiyaz-wp7us
      @MohdRiyaz-wp7us 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@funfactz5605 Bro chill..I was just talking about this debate..

    • @ps93747
      @ps93747 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@MohdRiyaz-wp7usconvert detected opinion rejected!

  • @vishnushabaraya2489
    @vishnushabaraya2489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Secularism is dying only for india today

    • @atulkumar-pr4yo
      @atulkumar-pr4yo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is secularism? Will u please define?😂

    • @EvolveYourBrain
      @EvolveYourBrain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If secularism is dying it’s only because the tolerant are tired of appeasement of the intolerants.

    • @gyanibaba25
      @gyanibaba25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@atulkumar-pr4yosecularism is majority ko chutiya bnao

    • @palaksdarji
      @palaksdarji 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sahi kaha bhai, Rahul doesn't seem to be very happy with the result. 😂😂

  • @user-bb4qt8xo4u
    @user-bb4qt8xo4u หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THANKS,🙏🙇TO, " INDIA TODAY CONCLAVE " FOR GIVING SUCH A GREAT DEBATE .
    ❤❤ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🐯🦁🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉🕉🚩🚩" OUR SANATANI NATION'S, DEVELOPMENT, & SAFETY & SECURITY " IS OUR FIRST PRIORITY ,& OUR EACH CITIZEN'S FIRST RESPONSIBILITY, FOR OUR FUTURE YOUNGER CHILDREN'S LIFE PROSPERITY.
    " SANATANI HINDU RASHTRA ( BHARAT ) IS THE ONLY ONE COUNTRY , " SAVE OUR HINDU RASHTRA , FROM " TERRORIST " & MAFIA'S ,.
    " THIS IS MY REQUEST🙏😊 TO,
    , ALL " PATRIOTIC " CITIZEN'S OF " BHARAT." ( INDIA )🇮🇳❤🇮🇳🙏

  • @user-vg9ml3ug1g
    @user-vg9ml3ug1g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I blame Nehru for today's situation.... What we are as a hindu🕉️

  • @nagendarbabu111
    @nagendarbabu111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Why don't the Ashutosh and company discuss Kashmir , Kerala, Bengal killings

    • @rathivarma9649
      @rathivarma9649 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They won’t , because they cannot face truth, the bitter truth. The film Kerala story and Kashmir files threw some light on the peaceful community activities in these states. 3 or 300 doesn’t make much difference ,when innocents become victims of treachery . Only the parents of victim dies , but for the doers it is Jihad in the name of religion. Shama Muhammed though being from Kerala fails to see eye to eye , because religion comes first for them and not innocent girls cheated and thrown into gutter.

  • @user-mz1mm2gk4d
    @user-mz1mm2gk4d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    This Ashutosh guy is a big joke. There is something terribly wrong with his thought process that he thinks everything is wrong. He generalises events perpetrated by small fringe elements and this is very dangerous.

    • @pichumanisankar2617
      @pichumanisankar2617 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He is extremely prejudiced and always on an one way street and this speaks volumes for his cussed attitude and we can hardly call him a political analyst.

    • @chanakyabharat756
      @chanakyabharat756 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      There are crores of such people😂😂

    • @riteshattam620
      @riteshattam620 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂

    • @rajaramakutty9088
      @rajaramakutty9088 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Even Delhi mayor Kejriwal couldn't stand Ashutosh, kicked him out of AAP😂😂

    • @VK-md7jm
      @VK-md7jm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chanakyabharat756 Spot on. Those who are sleeping need to be woken up. They most likely suffer from inferiority mindset. They will never answer: If Hindus are no more a majority, will India still be secular??? They need to answer: There are 57 muslim countries that follow Islamic laws, there is 1 country for Jews, there are 117 countries that lean Christian. Hindus have NONE. Why????

  • @sunithaacharya4340
    @sunithaacharya4340 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ashutosh should speak about the atrocities perpetrated on Hindu women by a certain Shah Jahan and how the secular TMC defended him. This is secularism for Ashutosh.

  • @kgmuralidharan07
    @kgmuralidharan07 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hindal Sengupta spoke very well. Enjoyed it. Spoken as an Indian as he put it.

  • @Mrbombastic614
    @Mrbombastic614 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Bro Sai Deepak and Ranganath sir would have demolished tmc and Ashutosh

    • @chanakyabharat756
      @chanakyabharat756 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sai ok but Ranganath is bluff

    • @ss74blr
      @ss74blr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why shoot a brahmastra on a sparrow?

    • @rajkumarkaul8028
      @rajkumarkaul8028 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Captains for the finals😅

    • @jayaduttabhoumik784
      @jayaduttabhoumik784 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chanakyabharat756 How is he a bluff, please elaborate...🤔🤔

  • @aniketsharma9388
    @aniketsharma9388 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +408

    Without lust islam dust 😂😂😂

    • @aniketsharma9388
      @aniketsharma9388 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      @@faultlines3399 54 year old Mohammed rap^d 6 year old Ayesha
      #exmuslim sahil youtube Chanel

    • @aniketsharma9388
      @aniketsharma9388 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      @@faultlines3399 6 saal ki bachchi se 🤡🤡🤡
      #exmuslim sahil

    • @jaishks
      @jaishks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@faultlines3399what hard evidence you have that God actually spoke to Muhammad? 😂 flying donkey?

    • @yourstrulytk12
      @yourstrulytk12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@faultlines3399
      ?

    • @nicolasflamel3489
      @nicolasflamel3489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@faultlines3399 hinduism precedes ram by thousands of years. pisslam started with popat

  • @shikharsarswat1609
    @shikharsarswat1609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shehla Rashid shora ,always loved to listen her whether this side of that ! I wonder how she has been disappeared from National politics aura

  • @anuragdixit7
    @anuragdixit7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am very impressed by sehzad's body language,every time when other guest came he stood showing respect or even after they debated,these small gestures shows his hardwork and how much these small manners are imbibed in his personality.😊

  • @nationalistsanghi5897
    @nationalistsanghi5897 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    इस debate को shehzad, शेहला rasheed ने जीत लिया...fact और logic पर बात रखी...जबकि कोंग्रेसी ने सिर्फ bla बला कुछ भी...

    • @sumantkumar7079
      @sumantkumar7079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ticket chahiye 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ss74blr
      @ss74blr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shehla Rashid? Read her tweets on Mother Sita and Lord Rama! It is beyond disgusting comments that she made. Now for political ambitions she is acting secular! The snake!

    • @mmsdesigners8463
      @mmsdesigners8463 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm totally agree with you 👍

    • @rahooblack
      @rahooblack 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sumantkumar7079Haan, de

  • @qf8822
    @qf8822 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +138

    The word Secularism should be removed from constitution by Members of Parliament

    • @ashishdhiwar6226
      @ashishdhiwar6226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why

    • @k45rt789jh
      @k45rt789jh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Why not

    • @ashishdhiwar6226
      @ashishdhiwar6226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@k45rt789jh he should answer first as he wants to remove something that is already included in constitution. So.. why remove the word secularism? You want the nation to include only one religion?

    • @raghvendrasingh9675
      @raghvendrasingh9675 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@ashishdhiwar6226 'secular' term was not present in Original Constitution. It was added during Emergency by 42nd CAA. Similar is the word "socialist'.
      These are token terms for appeasement, nothing else. If you read Fundamental Rights, DPSPs - you will realize our Constitution already has the essence of being secular and socialist.
      Also, Originally, certain segments of Constitutional provisions were meant for that purpose -- that too socialist tendencies were in DPSPs, left to govt to implement when appropriate. Forcefully putting them in Preamble is a desperate vote catching attempt.
      The illusion these terms have created is astounding. Numerous Religion-specific laws have been created and their existence justified by holding these terms to ransom. Wakf Act, Places of Worship Act, Muslim Personal Law and so on.
      Today distortion has exceeded so much that 'secularism' is loosely translated as of Muslim nature, due to un-counted appeasements.

    • @prasanna3378
      @prasanna3378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@raghvendrasingh9675 *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.*
      *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan*
      *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.*
      *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.*
      *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.*
      *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.*
      *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.*
      *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.*
      *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.*
      *Follow only Science and Humanism.*
      *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.*
      *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."*
      *-Christopher Hitchens*
      *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."*
      *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism*
      *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram*
      *These poor people, who are so fond of religion, they don't understand that it's the religion, the very religion they're defending, it's that religion that kills people.*
      *All Humanists are friends of all humanists. Sanatani, Sikh, Christian, Musalman these all are hoax. All these religions and religious identities are fabricated. Find the human in you, and in the other person, even if it's Kaffir or Musalman.*
      *Leave Religion, accept Humanism. Don't be a Musalman, be a Human.*

  • @smiritigoswamiclass-5.398
    @smiritigoswamiclass-5.398 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We are always with neutral and intellectual media.❤😂🎉.

  • @nandakishore2497
    @nandakishore2497 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    So many Rahuls are in Support for Secularism😂😂😂😂

  • @Sahilk503
    @Sahilk503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    All Opposition Debater Vs Shehjad.
    Shehjad just Nailed everyone.

  • @lrsailosailo745
    @lrsailosailo745 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is the first debate after India got independence, which clearly show secularism.is dying....

  • @straightpoint6419
    @straightpoint6419 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Even Seila Rashid is supporter of Modi present, what do you need in the name od secularism?

  • @sarvajanhitaay
    @sarvajanhitaay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    15:18 it is true
    Godse was a patriot. Nobody can raise question about that.
    And he wasn't a terrorist but at max a murderer.

    • @M.k_khan
      @M.k_khan หลายเดือนก่อน

      Godse was a terrorist. This is known to Everyone, nothing new.

  • @gkshorts8690
    @gkshorts8690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Shehzad ko sunne ke liye aaya tha main

  • @karthikb5
    @karthikb5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good debate.
    Kudos to all participants

  • @siddharthanvarier3342
    @siddharthanvarier3342 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Secularism is not just about providing lawful succour to victims,
    but goes far, far ahead of GUARANTEEING secularism to each and every Indian, irrespective of their religious affinities
    The Rock of Gibraltor could be nudged but never DISLODGED

  • @tusharparikh4322
    @tusharparikh4322 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Great job Ponawala! Thank you from bottom of my heart to clarify what Secularism really means; it is not the appeasement but equal opportunities for every one.

  • @ritwijayushmaan1834
    @ritwijayushmaan1834 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Bravo! India Today is certainly setting standards for debate.

  • @KNBasu
    @KNBasu 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Whereas any Government's achievements must be highlighted, their failures must also be discussed and questioned. Governments are elected by people and they are accountable. Governments must not bulldoze, rather find consensus in decision making. The mainstream media is not questioning the government for their failures and instead questioning the opposition who have already been ousted by the electorate for their misdeeds. That's the irony.

  • @viveksinghal8149
    @viveksinghal8149 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was the fascinating debate result of the debate reflects the mood of the Nation

  • @VedicKausik
    @VedicKausik 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Debate is the culture of Bharat, thanks for organizing it.

  • @SoniSingh-fl8cf
    @SoniSingh-fl8cf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏
    Jai Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏

  • @paramjitsinghb1
    @paramjitsinghb1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Having a debate on the subject itself highlights if it's dying or already dead.

  • @shubhamchavhan444
    @shubhamchavhan444 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    आनंद रंगनाथन Sir को बहुत miss किया। ओ होते तो मजा आ जाता 🎉🎉

  • @sreeramtirumala8076
    @sreeramtirumala8076 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    My question to congress debator. entire parliaments of World have prayers of Sanatan Dharm books whether it's US,uk Germany, middle East, Australia....

  • @user-bu1ih3vn5y
    @user-bu1ih3vn5y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Sai deepak supposed to be there ,, then you would know this term Secularism invented from where and inserted in india,, this is word used by church

    • @Avant-garde1611
      @Avant-garde1611 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yupp he would have raised the bar of this debate really highh

  • @tollirengen8493
    @tollirengen8493 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not to forget!..secularism in fact not dying in INDIA which means still the citizens of India wants to remains the same democracy ideology...So no one or no political party members can change the constitution of India by the undemocratic and unreligious ideologies.As far as the majority votes of secularism is concerns as in the debates show at the conclave,we are proud to be Indians always. Long live secularism INDIA!!...🎉🎉 0:56

  • @dantalasubhash8019
    @dantalasubhash8019 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Secularism is not dying anyway.Only pseudo secularism is dying because nowadays common people are awakened and thinking in a good direction and moving in the society for the development and maintaining good relation among the people irrespective of caste and religion.

  • @dashavanchikkagudda4192
    @dashavanchikkagudda4192 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Poonawalla beautiful speak

  • @tinuwatijamir675
    @tinuwatijamir675 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In this type of debates audience must be equally participate as per religion basis and even the political parties as well.

  • @madhusudanarao5252
    @madhusudanarao5252 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The title (Secularism is dying in India) itself is prejudicial. How can they form that opinion before beginning of the debate? Who are they to decide that the Secularism is dying? The title should be 'Status of Secularism India'

  • @shubhanag
    @shubhanag 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Yay!! shehzaaad!!!!❤

    • @jaip8442
      @jaip8442 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

  • @vasudevantk3433
    @vasudevantk3433 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Wow Shehzad wow👍🏻👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @user-vg9ml3ug1g
    @user-vg9ml3ug1g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They were outstanding both...... Sheila and shehzad❤❤

  • @manzoorahmadlone6552
    @manzoorahmadlone6552 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It is not about a good or a bad debate .It is about fluency of the language one speaks and the political hypocracy

  • @devopriyomukerjee7892
    @devopriyomukerjee7892 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Hindol and Shehzad by far the best debaters by a long distance…congress spokesperson needs a lot of practice.

    • @ankushyadav6814
      @ankushyadav6814 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not about good or bad debaters when you don't have anything truth to say.

  • @urmilladevikumar4716
    @urmilladevikumar4716 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Shama is taking out her personal anger😅😅😅😅😅

  • @user-zc2jj4vy7h
    @user-zc2jj4vy7h หลายเดือนก่อน

    True secularism is now going to be in good health now, stil need to improvement

  • @AbhishekSingh-dz5zj
    @AbhishekSingh-dz5zj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best debate and Shehzad and Sheila ❤is best🎉

  • @swastideep207
    @swastideep207 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    sehzad wins the days thats it

  • @rachurisuresh1014
    @rachurisuresh1014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    If u think secularism is dying ,this debate will not occur

  • @SuperUhdam
    @SuperUhdam หลายเดือนก่อน

    When secularism is spoken about we think , politics and religion. We should include business.
    So the definition of secularism revolves around three pillars: religion, politics and business 😊

  • @designernidhi132
    @designernidhi132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Bjp ko log muslim virodhi khte h or bjp ke liye 2 muslim hi khade h jo usko is debate me support kr rhe h yhi h sbka sath sabka vikash sbka viswas

  • @sharadkumar7243
    @sharadkumar7243 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is old wonderful India today. Please do more like this.

  • @Sahilk503
    @Sahilk503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Shehjad and Shehla has won the Debate. Opposition has not a single good debater.

  • @KSH132
    @KSH132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Secularism is not dying but definitely muslim appeasement nd vote bank politics dying

  • @manvisingh5598
    @manvisingh5598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shocking is Sheila Rashid speaking in favour of secularism is not dying in India.

  • @anantnarayan7070
    @anantnarayan7070 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    India was ruled by Muslim invaders for more than 500 plus years. The Cristian invaders for more than 200 years. was the secularism not dying/dead then? We had one party Congress rule after independence for nearly 50 plus years. Was
    Dictator/autocratic rule was never felt then? the most misunderstood word is secularism and only request the speakers to define Secularism.

  • @nabaneetasinha2863
    @nabaneetasinha2863 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For Riju Datta…my question is Why Mamata Banerjee inaugarates no of Durga Puja pandals during Durga puja…

  • @t.sudarsanpatro4883
    @t.sudarsanpatro4883 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Satisfactory

  • @diveshchauhan1767
    @diveshchauhan1767 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That Hindol Sir Smile 😁 And Arguments Were Just 💯

  • @JainShalinee-om4fn
    @JainShalinee-om4fn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Shehzad wow wow just wow👏👏

  • @deepeshsao1008
    @deepeshsao1008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can clearly see the difference as to who is reading from the paper who has the intellectual badwidth to speak up his/her mind. Shshzad did as no one else. 👏

  • @ravishankar729
    @ravishankar729 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Topic should be "secularism is not dying in India" rather otherway. Shazad really rocks

  • @mukulpal8875
    @mukulpal8875 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Hinduism is polytheistic-pluralistic -religion ,culture and civilization from 1000s of years we have given refuge to Parsi ,Shia Muslim ,jew ,polish christian and many more and defeated two intolerant and hateful bullies and colonizer's and we still remain Hindu rastra.

    • @mayankindian3750
      @mayankindian3750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes 💪✊😌🥰🇮🇳✊❤️🕉️

  • @srimantaghosh02
    @srimantaghosh02 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hindol's opening sentence 👏 👏

  • @rajagopalannarayanan9364
    @rajagopalannarayanan9364 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    All jnu guys in the audience voted for the motion. 75 % is high number.
    Ashutosh have a life man.

  • @siddharthanvarier3342
    @siddharthanvarier3342 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Before getting into the nitty-gritty of the topic, it is needed to understand it in its right perspective.
    Secularism is very much ALIVE and KICKING in this country. SHOULD THE INDIA ALLIANCE COME BACK TO POWER, this would be reinforced into its FULL POTENTIAL