TBT to when lawyer Abhinav Chandrachud tore apart India's changes in the CAA
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มี.ค. 2024
- “Is the Citizenship Amendment Act anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu?” Throwback to 2020 when lawyer and writer Abhinav Chandrachud tore apart India's changes in the CAA.
Brut India is the fastest-growing digital video publisher in the country. We're a young, independent platform producing compelling journalism in new formats.
You can also find us here:
Facebook: / brutindia
Instagram: / brut.india
Twitter: / brutindia
Snapchat: Brut India
Snapchat: Brut India Stories
If You implement his ideas then all countries refugees come to India. But there are no single Muslim country who ready to take these refugees to their country. I am surprised that Gaza people are living in horrible environment without food. But Egypt refused to take Gaza people to their countries.
What are trying to say, elaborate little more.
if MODI could send 90 planes to evacuate students through operation Ganga, food for thought.
Exactly 💯
True brother liberals are gonna cry even krishna had haters doesn’t mean he was wrong just ignore them for now
Why do compare a democratic country like India with fundamentalist dictatorships?
This guy is the son of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud. He got similar articulation style as of his father.
same thoughts I had.. was looking for this comment haha
Is Wafq board and Minority council in secular country is constitutional? 🤣🤣🤣
So a council for any Minority in India is unsecular???🤣🤣🤣
You are right, let's just remove all the reservation system in India relating to Govt jobs/colleges, etc. Let everyone be equal👍
@@jdjdjdjdjdjdjdjd-hx5tt😂 damn those reservation system 😂 and minority system 😂
Article 14 padho
@@user-kf7gp4wh2q Article 14 only applicable for Indians not foreign refugees.
@@user-kf7gp4wh2q Article 14 only applicable for Indian not foreigners
If partition was on the basis of religion, all the subsiquent policies regarding partion should be on the basis of religion. Secondly, if we are talking about minorities in Pakistan, and should not associate religion with it, then why is minority status associated with religion in India.
The Muslim League did the partition. Why does secular India need to be become another Afghanistan or another Saudi Arabia when for more than 50 years it has mocked the "Islamic nations" of not giving priority to humanity over religion.
Really nice argument. Very Impressed.
@@user-ww2lc1yo9cexplain how it will be ? Loser, India being hindu majority for millennia didn't become extreme so what the heck you are spouting?
This fancy b s will not stop the help being provided to minority of pak, afghan
The so called 'disturbances' did not begin in 1947. The Great Calcutta killings and the Noakhali killings had already occured and it goes back centuries.
By denying caa, isn't he violating the persecuted Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs from these 3 countries?? How are such advocates, activists different from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, who also treat Hindus, Jains, Sikhs etc as 4th class citizens.
tujh se na go paayega beta. 🤣@@guhamurugan8671
@guhamurugan8671 he's not violating them , if you truly heard his speech correctly with a sound mind you'd figure out that what he's trying to imply is that why is there not inclusion of other minorities in the caa , he's not against the prosecuted sikhs, buddhists and hindus AT ALL .
@@guhamurugan8671 seems like you didn't pay attention to what he was saying, or well you did not want to, could be that too, but he was clearly talking about why should certain communities and people be excluded from the CAA, if it has to be implemented, it should be on grounds of equality, a fundamental right on which our constitution is based.
@@abhaykumarsingh6359 if the country has to implement with equality than our nation would be destroyed
Ambedkar once said partition could only happen by the partition of population but gandhi had anshan
Gandhi was right
Gandhi has committed crime by Not allowing Transfer of total Muslim population to Pakistan , he had perhaps vested interests in pampering muslims , people have explored roots his family tree and no wonders why he pampered them
@@mohitanand1844 yeah my friend chinmay gandhi that there should be no muslims in our country
@@mohitanand1844 yeah my friend chinmay gandhi that there should be no muslims in our country
@@mohitanand1844 No. Gandhi was not right. Gandhi enabled the genocide of Hindus in Sindh and West Punjab and East Bengal and Khyber Pakhtunkwa.
man the last few minutes he speaks the harsh facts as an atheist giving citizenship on the basis of religion is an absurd idea.
Not so absurd when you come to know that countries run successfully on a shared ideology, a common enemy, or something common to call 'Jai' on. For India that's Hinduism in majority. Maybe even upper class Hinduism. Common enemy being pakistan (or muslims in case of india manytimes)
He is trying to say that we have to provide citizenship to Muslims of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. If Muslims are not safe in Muslim countries. Then please raise ur voice on UN and other international formus about safety of Muslims in Muslim countries.
he is also asking for citizenship of jews and bahai's and parsis i guess
@@user-jb4ce6qq9u parsis are getting citizenship read caa,,
Aise log future mein CJI banega toh Hindus ka kya hoga soch lo ....BJP bhi kuch nahi kar payega
Yes good idea take the lead.
@@user-jb4ce6qq9uall jews across the world can get citizenship in Israel
Why is he not talking of Partition as unconstitutional 😂😂😂😂
He will talk only few parts where he can make Argument remaining he cannot speak as that is where real issue is .like waqf and kashmir persecution of Hindus, bangaldesh Hindus declining rate .
How can partition be unconstitutional when consitution was not formed?
@@mrinmoykshattry527 so everything wrong happened before it should be forgotten lol this logic amazes me
@@mrinmoykshattry527 whatever wrong is wrong whetether constitution is formed or not by basic common sense we know it .and if this law will does in justice to good Muslims then it is also wrong brothers we can't let good people suffer because of some wrong ones
@@srinadhj2638 WTF is GOODMUSLIM, for FUCKSSAKE stop. CAA talks about Indians and Citizenship, nothing about Indian Muslim who are Citizens.
It's time to make democratic our Judiciary system not based on nepotism & family member system. 💙✊🏾
Is Muslim personal law board, shariya law, Polygamy, Child marriage for teenage girl and no proper alimony for divorced wife and kid is very secular and constitutional?
The first wave of hindus and sikhs coming from west pakistan were "displaced" because they were living in west pakistan and modern day islamabad. The muslims who came back from west pakistan in the second wave were evacuee's because they chose to leave india(a new democracy) and move to a muslim majority west pakistan and then return back to india because it was not to there liking. Its a shame he cant tell the difference between these 2 groups of people and why constitutionally required 2 separate terms, because 1 group didnt have a choice while the other one did. Also the displaced properties of Hindus in west pakistan was given to muslims arriving and the displaced properties of muslims in india were handed out to WAQF board, along with other superior rights which exists to this date. The same WAQF board which claimed a 2000year old Hindu temple to be muslim land when islam itself is 1300 years old. This man clearly forgot the partition was on the basis of religion... so if religion was the core reason of the problem, then why cant religion be part of the solution?
Exactly!! Wilful n selective ignorance on his part to not know the difference between the two groups!! Referring to Bangladeshi immigrants coming to India as ‘Indian Muslims’ is itself a joke!
Aptly put 👍🏼
i realised this in the first 50 seconds of this video.....rest seems a waste of time.
Very well put.
Very dumb reasoning. The entire country was erupting in violence and muslims who were forced to leave in the ensuing violence should have been allowed to get their homes back. Forget citizenship, just because you left your country does not mean your property is free real estate either.
What Nonsense.... He is looking at partition migrations through the lens of Constitution and laws. Being invaded for so long was wrong. Then the whole idea of splitting a land at the hands of invaders on the basis of religion was flawed. All the Communal violence that happened bcoz of partition was unconstitutional and flawed and a dark chapter in our history. So how can he expect complete constitutional fairness when it came to migrations....
Im a Sikh. We migrated from Rawalpindi to Jammu, and now working in Bangalore. Our Properties in Rawalpindi were immediately given to Muslims and were considered Enemy Properties. At least India gave it a better term called 'Evacuee Property'...
Secondly, Muslims partitioned India, and then They happily migrated to Pakistan, and then some of them realized in 1948 that India was better and decided to go back?? What Nonsense. Then why was Pakistan formed. Why did an overwhelming majority of them support this partition movement?? Ideally none should have been accepted back after the chaos they supported...
CAA is for those non-Muslims who were stopped from entering India during partition owing to permit system and Nehru-Liaqat Pact. It simply fast tracts their citizenship process. Still if a Muslim wishes to come here, he/she can come under the old existing process which takes slightly longer. There are over 100k Afghani/Rohingya/North African Muslims living in Delhi NCR alone. Many have Indian Citizenship
Muslims like Owaisi's family who supported Pakistan were not only given equal a chance to stay in India but also equal rights in India and a also chance to enter Indian politics...
The fact that India gives equal rights to Muslims and Hindus despite being 80% Hindu is something to be appreciated. In Pak and Bangladesh, they are 2nd class citizens in terms of rights and priviliges
Good points
You get it wrong i think he talked about all those person who excluded or include not make more sense for instance like many Muslim community in those countries treated same as non Muslim like ahmadiya or ahmadiya if it really the CAA was based for helping those minority or people in those countries who are illtreated then it also includes them also
It unconstitutional because the act discriminate on the basis of religion 😊
Perfectly said !👏🏻👍🏻
@@raj2375did Ahmadiyas not support the partition of Bharat, which led to butchering of millions of non-Muslims in bloody riots, engineered for the demand of Pakistan??
CAA is for those helpless victims, who never got a chance to decide their destiny and were forced to live in a nation which considered them 'Hostages'.
How hard is this to understand?
Jaake padhai karle bhai. Nahi to adhe jhat ka knowledge leke yaha waha muh kala karwata rahega.
this video is like 4 years, why being circulated now?
Because they want to spread propoganda... Clearly, the left is not happy
Because the government has implemented CAA now. It is the talk of the town, so obviously the pro and con arguements will be circulated.
He actually articulated it really well. Expecting a person to tell the positives of CAA with this clarity to get a better clarity.
As of now caa is an unwanted clog at the time. Tightening your border security should most probably do it
Oh yes, youtube is the chamcha of a 3rd world country. Grow up.
A young Indian with a great heart, values and justice. God bless him.
It's easy to say good things with love on stage. But in reality it is really opposite. In India many illegal people living in country with aadhar card and ration card.
Its not that deep, India isnt a first world developed country that the immigrants are taking advantages of any facilities, infact they are working as hard as any other indian for their survival and i dont see any problem with that. there are alot more problems which have a bigger impact than just illegal immigrants
@@willywonky20 I am just asking why only India is responsible to take refugees from all over world. If Muslim is not safe in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Then please raise the voice on UN about poor conditions of Muslims in Muslim countries.
@@willywonky20 But better than those countries from where they are coming.
West Bengal and Assam is main places.
Are they giving taxes ? do you think they will have the same level of loyaltylike other indians?
@@willywonky20
CAA is not about secularism/unsecularism/democracy/dectatorship etc. It is about an unfinished business of partition which was done on the basis of religion. Pakistan was for muslims and for the muslims who voted to form Pakistan. Overnight, non-muslims families who could not leave Pakistan due to confusion or lack of means, found themselves in an hostile land and were punished for their religious identity. So, CAA is only for those INDIANS who could not come to India during partion and whose religion did not match with the religion of the land. That explains why other contries/religion etc have not been included.
Toh baad mein aakr normal way mein citizenship lo na bhai kisne roka hai? Why should a common man suffer in the competition of job market due to those people?
@@Backup22211they are already in India working for their livelihood
@@Backup22211We should claim 70% quota for sc, st and muslims of india so that we don't have to suffer due to these migrants.
But that's not it. Look what the former president fakhruddin Ali ahmed's family and one kargil veteran. CAA doesn't work alone but with NPR and NRC that's where the problem is. What about srilanka and Burma refugees? They purposely left those two countries because those refugees have muslims.
@@firyalazeera5396Bharat was not partitioned to make Burma. India was partitioned with bloodshed, for the demand of Indian Muslims, to have a separate Muslim nation for Muslims. Millions of non-Muslims were killed to push ahead the demand for Pakistan.
Non-Muslims of Pakistan, didn't get a chance to put their demands or have consultation with India, for their rehabilitation or evacuation or any other rights.
CAA atleast seeks to fast track the citizenship of those non-Muslims, who were wronged in 1947.
His first part of speech 👍🏻
Second part 👎🏼
His administrative sense is zero. Govt has taken right steps.
Such progressive mind
Best things i love in his speech that he talked about atheist ⚛️ and agnostic peoples... which people in India doesn't bothered
Trying to encompass every 'jeev' under the sun!
But actually it's an old/partition time law, or a situation arose because of religion based partition that displaced 'minorities' in Pakistan NOT in India, will b given citizenship in India
It took 70 years to do it, that's the saddest part😢
Basically he is going to next CJI , like his grandfather and father . He is born to be CJI .like Rahul Gandhi born to become pm . If they stay in power like this India will become monarchy again. Dynasty will run this country
@@laxmanchoudhary9113 it's the idealogy you vote for, not the person.
@@Backup22211we don't vote for cji😑
He is deliberately confusing the issue with a clear agenda in mind. No law is 100% correct, that's why amendments are made over a period of time to make the law as realistic & practical as possible.
exactly!! There are already requests being made by minorities of Pak, agf, bang to give some relaxation on the cutoff date of 31st dec 2014. This could easily be implemented by an amendment in the future when the govt is ready but this guy wants to include every possible scenario into this act from day1 just for the sake of making arguments.
Ya. This guy is literally nitpicking lol😂
The criticisms that he has made could be the basis for making amendments for the law. Instead of considering it his agenda can you not think of it as constructive criticism? In a democracy everyone has the right to express their opinions as you do.
@@akshatjoshi1696why it should be taken as constructive criticism when there's nothing constructive 😂. People are not fools. We can say who has an agenda.
@@akshatjoshi1696because the agenda can be clearly seen in the way he's presenting the points?
Constructive criticism doesn't need long stories and whataboutery.
There are no specific laws catering to atheists and they are considered as belonging to the religion of their birth for administrative purposes.
So the question in the title is 🐂 💩
To people misinterpreting him (including the video title), he is not saying CAA is wrong simply because it mentions religion or dares to have religious grounds, he points out how the constitution itself had religious basis in its origin and seemingly 'secular' articles. This should be obvious to any Indian who knows what partition really was. His objection is more about the problematic definitions and edge cases than its philosophy.
He really needs to brush up his logical reasoning. As Harish Salve says and rightly says (paraphrasing) " A state can extend it''s ambit of humanitarian actions to any community and this in no way implies a discrimination against others." If I give alms to poor in my locality, its a fallacy to call me discriminatory against poor from streets in Baghdad. By this logic, any generosity and charity until and unless covers everyone on this planet runs the risk of being labelled unconstitutional. HIs confidence in his reasoning and that too on a public forum is a concern. If these guys are top lawyers and future judges, God bless us!
Well too bad, he's a top lawyer with his flawed logical reasoning and you're a TH-cam commenter with your divine logical reasoning. Just like people with college degrees are selling pakodas and people with tea making degrees are running countries.
top lawyer...lol. son of a top judge. period. and none of us are just youtube commenters. i am keeping this respectful as it should be :).
@@rajseth2435
Adding "SECULAR, SOCIALIST" In
1976 Constitution Amendment is illegal😂😂😂😂by unconstitutional... By Indira Gandhi govt
educate agitate organize
Imitation won't work
How many Bangladeshi have been made Indian Citizen by illegal means by Communist Government and now Mamata
Nothing wrong in secularism thats what our society should be and we will always stand up for it
you should refer the article 25 to 28 & dpsp
@@Pratik6554
Secularism will not survive with muslims. India and it's culture stands for Vasudev Kutumbkam and it's principles will survive if Hindus remain in majority of this country.
Jay Hindu Nation 🇮🇳🕉️💪
Supreme court judges appointment still very unconstitutional.
Read Article 124 of Indian Constitution
Read article 124 of Indian Constitution .
@Vibhanshu....I think once you should go through with the article 124-147 part V (the union) and chapter 6(The union judiciary) of the Indian constitution........🥲so that you can know appointment of judges is very unconstitutional or not......🙂
@@strang3r___..... consultation was not Binding in nature...... rather by the SC judgements it was evolved the collegium system... originally it was never a part of Indian constitution....
Let me ask u a question
Given me one example in the world of a democratic country where Judges selects judges???
@@proudhindustanihindu2725Nhi hota Bhai. Ye Rajshahi chala rahe Hain Jahan SC judge ka beta ya uske parivar waale ya uske kareebi hi SC ke judge bante hain. Sabse undemocratic institution Judiciary hai aur ye Gyan de rahe.
Can you post the link for the full video?
The partition happened because there was mistrust between Hindus snd Muslims. Leaders of parties with religious ideology couldn't agree to a single country.
There was not one leader who said you British just go, leave this matter to us. Because truly no Indian then had the confidence to administer all these conflicters, so the British could have their way. Indians then and even today have not learned to be inclusive. The British managed to rule all over the sub continent because they had skills needed. We still have some going to do.
If we allow everyone into India what is the need of partition
These people are misusing secularism and taking Hindus for a ride.
instead we should ban immigration.......let people do whatever they want outside of india.......all we need to care about people inside of india
Not everyone. If minorities from neighbouring countries, why not all minorities from all neighbouring countries?
Akhand bharat
@@sreeram4964 y did they declared Islamic State than khangress?
He didn't mention #Persecution.
Why?
Because that was not part of its stand up comedy script😂
@@user-priyamishraarmybrat😂😂😂
Bcz there is none.refugees who coming are just who wana take the advantage of finacial opportunity
@@user-priyamishraarmybrat when you cant argue with facts and points you just mock the person.
Bro data is available about the persecution of minorities in these countries @@Anjdmk
secular secular secular😂😂
Ucc?
Why tax on hindu temple?
Muslims voted for a partition, so now whether like it or not, they have to live with it in their countries. They can not just break our country in the name of religion and then come back in the name of secularism.
Check your facts. Only 3% of Muslim people (mostly rich ones) actually cast the vote for the partition, as there were severe restrictions on who was allowed to vote. Most of the people who migrated back had nothing to do with it.
beating round the bush, the pain piont is about "not allowing muslims"
No the point is not allowing Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims. There is a difference.
@@sayandewan2860 Muslims who wanted to return to IND after going to east and west Pakistan were not allowed..ek bar Gaya so gaya
Muslims aren't in threat
Cause they are the threat
He is the son of the current CJI D Y Chandrachud.
Thanks for telling me this.....I was not knowing it..... despite reading his name 😂
Irrelevant
very important comment to know their biases
He is just a good speaker, Church of England was established to prevent Vatican from having any Influence over UK, Europe has it's own history , India has it's own. Every case should be evaluated on it's own merit,
Is this the reason of being dumb?
that's why education is important
It is as caste system against everything that is not Hindu. BJP tries to eliminate Muslim.
In India, officially there is nothing called as 'atheist' . One has to write religion based on his/her belief or birth.
i know...its sad
write where?
@@sbgaming002if you are a true atheist ,you should never bow to someone. Otherwise you are a phoney
@@hypergg681 have never written anywhere ?
Atheism is also a part of Hinduism. That is one of the reasons why other religious people particularly Islamists fear about Hinduism.
And what about Internally displaced people.. Like me.. From kashmir.. Any law for me.. Very eager to know. 😅
This doesn't fit in this nepo kid's agenda.
The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing an accelerated pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who arrived in India by 2014. The eligible minorities were stated as Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians
😅 instead of quoting CAA is unconstitutional, just say it needs few corrections and has few ifs and buts. Tyre puncture hogaya, gaadi unfit to travel.... Puncture repair karsakthe na.. gaadi ko kyon destroy karna .
But if the gaadi owner does not agree to puncture repair and wants to drive it on the road.., it will cause accident so the gaadi has to be stopped.
No need to change. We can’t give citizenship to mullahs
@@manyfacedonegod7243when did gaadi owener denied for that ???? In this case, tell me when the govt denied any consideration from the judiciary or lawyers? It's about 2 days when law is passed, no one given and recommendations. How can you fit your example here ????
Finally some one said it. Pin this comment secular media.
@@123dhruI agree with you
You bro come to face J.SAI DEEPAK sir then you sure you get your propaganda 🤣
Iski aukaat nhi hai J Sai Deepak se debate karne ki .😂😂
Jhatu Sai? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 tu dikhana chah raha hai kya ki kitna gawar hai?
@@HimanshuSharma-dg9vsaukat? Have you read abhinavs profile ? He is an advocate who practises at the Bombay High Court. He graduated from the LL.M. Program at Harvard Law School where he was a Dana Scholar, and from the JSM and JSD Programs at Stanford Law School where he was a Franklin Family Scholar. He worked as an associate attorney at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP in Los Angeles and Singapore .
That's his aukat
Your guy is just a mechanical engineer with a law degree from IIT.
@@Abk367 J sai deepak is also an advocate of Supreme court .And his arguments are far more relevant than mr chandrachud
Sai deepak religious psychopath
I can't believe comment is full of andhbhakt
Yeah you are very intellectual clown mf
Fr they just seeking to promote Hinduism they don't even want development and jobs
Open your mind and look for more perspectives. Rejecting every view after saying andhbhakt makes you a literal andhbhakt.
Andhbhakt good👍👍🤣🤣
Same here. I guess this channel is mostly followed by such people. But somehow Brut had the courage to upload this thing anyways.
He is blaming govt because they thought of the Hindus in east Pakistan. Great sir.😂
Nation safety, nation integrity>>>>>>>>secularism
You dont know the law. you are illiterate.
then there should be no citizenship for religious minorities mentioned in CAA
@@subhrajitgupta5535
Hahaha....I wish I can tell you my ed background .....anyways...
No doubt, but secularism is still important.
Laws have to be nuetral and equal for all,which only can guarantee National safety, integrity... Which you havent understand..!
So he is okay with giving citizenship to others but only wants people (from the countries who have been a continuous threat to India, Europe, and other parts of the world) must also be given easy entrance. I wonder what he has to say in 2024 regarding Europe's policies on immigrants.
And I believe it is very stupid to compare rules with what has not been done. Parsis who are being marginalised in Afghanistan and pakistan given a fast tracked citizenship does not make the law unconstitutional. What is this rubbish comparison? So the law can only be perfected only post considerations of all the minorities around the world and welcoming everyone to come to the the most populous country? What kind of rubbish arguments are made here?
NRC should be implemented as soon as possible.
Illegal immigrants or peoples should be thrown out of country as soon as possible.
Chandrachurd ????? Sound like future cji ,
Collegium System rocks 😂
Ye toh haath jhadke apne Priya United Kingdom chale jayega. 😅
Impossible
@@VAACL then u have no idea how cji chose their sucessesor , monarchy at its finest .
🤣🤣🤣
He speaks with utmost confidence on the Citizenship Amendment Act because he will become the Chief Justice of Supreme Court and no one will question on the legitimacy of that act .
Mad Respect, brother. You are Someone Who understands that India should run by Constitutional, Humanitarian values and not by Political discriminatory, hate-mongering agendas.
It is disheartening to observe the oligarchy's influence over the judiciary in this democratic country through the collegium system. In the coming years, we might witness Chandrachud's son ascending to the position of Chief Justice of India, just as Chandrachud did, inheriting the role from his father. This exemplifies nepotism at its pinnacle.
@@XavierAngel-vx6yw agreed.myself hate the collegium system and neoptism everywhere even in BCCI. Thats why i Thank God CJI Ranjan Gogoi's Son or any relative was not in the Race to become the next CJI. Imagine Mr.Gogoi's Son/relative inherting father's role, taking CJI position with an *Ultimate aim in Life to win a seat in the house after Retirement* . It Would have been another disgraceful moment in judiciary in country which claiming to be Mother of Democracy.
Yes I agree in a Democracy Collegium system, PM's favourite Election commissioner system, and After Retirement Political Seat for Judges should END.
@@Salicylic_Acid2024 it's not disgraceful for educated people like S.Jaishankar, Ashwini Vaishnav, Ranjan Gogoi, Sachin Tendulkar, PT Usha etc. to become a member of Rajya Sabha. That's why it's called house of elders. Remember the CJI has the power to take the seat of President when it's vacant. Hidayatullah J, almost a decade after his retirement from the office of the CJI in 1970, in the aftermath of the dissolution of the erstwhile Janata government, Hidayatullah J was appointed as the 6th Vice President of India on August 31st 1979. He was unanimously elected, and served the full term, stepping down on August 30th, 1984. Vice President is the ex officio chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Who made him the vice president? Was it BJP?
@@XavierAngel-vx6ywWow. If judicial chair to Political chair is not Disgraceful which by common sense carries concerns of *Quid Pro Quo* , Then It will Certainly NOT be disheartening to witness someone EXTREMELY Educated(Doctor of law Science, from Standford law school) Mr. A.Chandrachur who today is pointing out and *UPHOLDING* the constantly fading *Constitutional values of a Free Democratic nation, India and also the perspective of International Humanitarian law which C a a Violates by Fundamentlly legitimzing Dis crimi nation based on Re ligion* , taking up Country's one of the most important Jobs as CJI in future, appointed By the President of India sort of how Mr Gogoi was nominated by President of India.
Democractic country will ONLY be Run by Constitution and Rule of law, Not by whim of an individual or Emotion of a group or any Political agenda. Thats the gist of Mr.A. Chandrachur's speech here.
Jai Hind, Bharat Mata ki Jai.
That's why we need reforms in the judiciary system of our country including The Appointment Process of Judges. These people have some sort of jaageer over this.
And this very mindset of these people is making our country perform so bad in the delivery of justice.
Wokeness must be ended from the judiciary.
Where is the logic?
The whole purpose of the judicial system to give justice.
WTF they gonna do if there is no woke essence,deliver justice on the account of WhatsApp knowledge.
Tbh I believe we shouldn’t give any citizenship to anyone coz already we are to much and I think this is the best let them live where they are born why should we share our resources to others which is already overburdened.
You can't end justice from our judiciary no matter what you do these judges will uphold our constitution and provide justice
@@__Martiandodowokeness ! That's the problem with the judiciary. Judiciary is historical and present based. It doesn't take into consideration the future part. They will fight for giving direct justice to 1 person. But they don't consider the indirect effects of lacs of other people.
@@__MartiandodoHow many ( non-Muslim immigrants ) will they be? When illegal immigrants will be expelled from India ( from WB especially) , burden will automatically be reduced exponentially.
@@bharwi_o7 you can expel someone who just came how u gonna expel to those who is living here for generation who was born here, he/she only knows India as his/her country and suppose u somehow expelled them where will they go do u think the other country will receive them after so many generations sometimes country don't even take those citizens who illegally cross borders to other country and couldn't take refuge and u thinking they will accept them after generation is this a joke or what?
The property left behind by Muslims were not given to any one other than the Wafq Board
Wafq Board is now the top 3rd land owner in India
Any layman would easily destroy his stupid arguments. The few minor valid points he spoke about require a minor correction, like adding jews in the list and Parsis from iran. Overall this law is LONG due and should be implemented immediately, along with NPR and NRC.
i don't mind about CAA but being Assamese it shouldn't be implemented in Assam because It contradict with assam accord 1985. I hope govt improvise the CAA and also look upon the interest of Assamese people.
Yep it shouldn't be implemented in the North East .. Bcuz the people coming to India from neighboring countries r culturally different from the North East and i think they have more in common with west and North India so they should go their
I am from Assam myself, plz don't find a excuse in the name of this Act to segregate other communities of India to enter in Assam or live in Assam. Apart from Bangladeshis anyone from any corner of the country could live in Assam it's not anyone's father property. Fuck Assam Accord 1985.
do you even read what is assam accord 1985 before typing your half baked knowledge? @@pinkuchoudhury27
@@pinkuchoudhury27yeah I agree with you I'm from WB I have visited Assam many times my mother is Assamese and I find Assam much developed on grassroots level than any other north eastern state in India infact much more developed than my own state and its only due to investment and settlement made by people from different parts of country.. also I have visited silchar and I guess majority there are Bengalis but they don't prefer talking in Bengali rather they speak Assamese.. it's my opinion btw I'm just a student attending college
It excludes those states which have special status as per section 6
This is like saying first Vande Bharat ran between two certain cities, but it is not right because every city has to be treated equal. You can either let people be helped in a systemic manner or be an obstacle all the while.
He's literally telling me that Im a woke and politically correct guy😂
@@ChandranPrema123 he isn't even politically correct 😂
First help the citizens of the country before giving illegal immigrants citizenship rights. This is the systemic way.
@@anushrutamitra7957
These are judicial laws......
And here, I pissed over them
Justice delayed is Justice denied. When Court could be proactive for Teesta Setalwad at midnight, meanwhile ignoring the crores of old cases stacked up for 'decades'..... why trust them ?
Judicial reforms and collegium must be gone.
@@anushrutamitra7957many things will happen for the first time in life ...u need to learn to cope. Constitution and other nonsense can be thrown to dustbin for a while
Atheist and jews should get the opportunity to get Indian citizenship
There is a very huge debate on CAA NRC , but one thing's clear for sure is that it can't be praised in entirety and at the same cant be called draconian.
CAA is meant to accelerate the grant of citizenship to those who have entered India fleeing religious persecution in Pak,Afghanistan and Bangladesh prior to 1st January, 2014 whose numbers have been estimated at around 30,000. The number of atheists who have fled Pakistan due to religious persecution and have sought asylum in India is estimated at ZERO.
Those who decry the CAA are promoting Islamofascism in the name of promoting secularism.
Proud on you and you should be in parliament but Indian politics will not allow you to be a member, I hope we will see members of parliament like you in next 50 years because it is very hard to crack this Indian politics।
No we don't want him. We are already in overload of hypocrites.
Shame on Indian Subcontinent Muslims for repressing minorities.
Bugg off leftist
Then take to your country to them or your home😂😂
@@rahul0898That’s exactly what the CAA is doing, bro!
@@Artrader_em8ko Is india a dharamshala or what you are keeping rohyangye,minority First handle our own people 👍
@@rahul0898 these guys are already in India before dec2014 n come due to persecution. That partion based on one religion is the reality n history of our land. Once who are not persecuted n safe in neighbouring Islamic countries should be sent back n not given citizenship because As you said we are not a Dharmsala!
in 13 MIN of good speech he blinked 13 MILLION times
heheeheheh...
He has issue with his sight, was unable to figure out who was applauding and who wasn't 😂
I cant even count how many points he said were wrong
1-in last he mentioned that a child never been to bangladesh would consider india as his land that never happens literally that never happens indians living aboad will most definitely some time or other recognize and side with india, especially muslims this religious brotherhood they have can be seen everywhere and even BR.Ambedkar ji said that as well even today u cant see any muslim u will be ready to hear bad about uae not just that they feel proud in the things that uae does
2-the fault of child argument is bullshit is it the fault of child who is born in poverty or is it the fault of child who has to go through argubily discriminatory reservation (i believe it should be there)
3- and about outlining the date and country you cannot just cure or help everybody heck just trying to help people who came before 2014 and were literally killed there are such kind of protest imagine if they had added more what kind of more protest there would have been so u know just studying things on the paper and have never gone through bullshit in his life kinda person only can say that everybody is equal but in real life it isn't true people are treated different and this cannot be ruleled out such dumbfuck imaginary ideal arguments doesnt help anybody in real life
People will always write something as they can't digest the truth 😊
Btw we're slamming 😂
It is disheartening to observe the oligarchy's influence over the judiciary in this democratic country through the collegium system. In the coming years, we might witness Chandrachud's son ascending to the position of Chief Justice of India, just as Chandrachud did, inheriting the role from his father. This exemplifies nepotism at its pinnacle.
@@XavierAngel-vx6yw Entertainment, Politics, Judiciary, really any system worth not letting go of will be affected by nepotism at some point
@@XavierAngel-vx6ywso you want to become CJI then😅...
It's required qualifications if he has then he will be there no body will stop him
It's a religious proposition not citizenship act as it says, what about non believers but still love India?
Than follow the usual law for citizenship.CAA is only if you were religiously persecuted in neighbouring countries and thus migrated to India before 2014.
yeah if you have birth certificate, aadhar etc you need not worry
But CAA has nothing to do with Indian Citizens
@@jadephoenix222 🤦
9:45 Established religion UK
10:55 Parsi
12:40 Bangladeshi illegal immigrants
“If Hindu Raj does become a fact, it will, no doubt be the greatest calamity for this country. No matter what the Hindus say, Hinduism is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity. It is incompatible with democracy. Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.” - Dr. Ambedkar (Pakistan or the Partition of India (1940))
Henceforth rahulraj prevails as prevalence prosecution right of delusionals...😂
Ambedkar was a British bootlicker and agent. He should be ignored.
In the same book, can you quote what Dr Ambedkar said about muslims and Islam?
There are hindu in majority only this is rhe reason india is a denocracy otherwise people like would have given their faith on swirds and fear of beheadinf 😂😂👊🏻
So instead of Hindu Raj you would prefer Sharia
This is exactly how nepotism make countries fall😂
Bjp have more nepo kids
@@Narutospeed_do your research. Mere saying that is out of hatred.
You are sleeping 😴 and they are working for their futer,here you talks about napotism which has no sense their,but what about your politics and religion especially brahmanism❤❤❤
Abhinav Chandrachud went to Harvard. Harvard takes you further in life than nepotism.
@@skbandhu7878
Ye bhi Brahmin hi hai now cry more.
so according to him we need to allow who ever comes in
yeah, through actual system of applying citizenship for anther country which is mostly similar to all other countries of the World.
So by rational thinking, No! not who ever comes in.
@@jdjdjdjdjdjdjdjd-hx5tt there are other provisions for non Indians to get citizenship they can apply through them, how did Taslima get Indian citizenship? how did Adnam get his citizenship? same way
CAA is for those who were persecuted
He is supremely talented!👏🏻 Next CJI in the making!🤩
He is very ignorant and half knowledge grownup since his father was CJI
I will give one example my uncle was very rich in 70 s at the time we are not poor but mainly depend on farming
My uncle kids go to school in car we always walk
My uncle always likes me b/c my grades and knowledge with intelligence and my hardworking nature I walk 3 km in morning and 3km in evening to go and come to school
One time we were met in their home and talking about scoters and price
My cousin said Vespa scooter was one lakh 50 thousands I ask him repeat he said same I told him this less than 10k
I remember my cousin with this pappu
@@96johntay Don’t share your watsapp university knowledge here🤣🤣🤣🤣
What we need is a refugee bill not a racist bill
Govt be like: we are give new caa topic, son indians not gonna talk about electoral bond
wohoo.. say whatever you want but with an impeccable English and people will be in awe of your intelligence and sensibility ......
He's ignoring the part that India-Pak border was initially as porous as US-Canada. Pakistanis played for the Indian cricket team till mid 50s. So, the mentioned permits were not needed.
India's tolerance is not limitless.
Pro Tip : When You Lie, You Blink Unusually More Than Normal. Go See The Video Now.
"Unusually"
His blinking is "usual"
Ever stood up on a stage and gave any basic speech? Heard of stage fear or anxiety? Ever even talked in public about such controversial laws? Probably not coz you are busy giving such "pro tips" on TH-cam, isn't it?
@@FarhanLifts 200 Times. Haven't Blinked Half As Much.
Modi blink 1000 times in his speeches uttering lies 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣
@@Anarchist369 Whatever This Dude Is Otherwise Saying Is Useless As Well. He Wants Us To Take In Pakistani Ahmadiyas. But Forgets That They Were In The Forefront Of Pakistan Movement.
Lots of learning from this video! Thank you Brut for providing such informative and respectful content like this! :)
It is disheartening to observe the oligarchy's influence over the judiciary in this democratic country through the collegium system. In the coming years, we might witness Chandrachud's son ascending to the position of Chief Justice of India, just as Chandrachud did, inheriting the role from his father. This exemplifies nepotism at its pinnacle.
he is knowlegible and 1000 times better than me. I know that he understands that India has a limitted territory and limited resources and we have the larges slums areas. We can not host everyone who needs citizenship and our law was made with years of analysis and should be respected. I enjoyed his speech and learnt alot. Thanks.
He doesnt even know what issues foreign Muslim immigration can cause. Has no regard for Indian culture. He is nothing but an elite illiterate.
So let the Hindus and Sikhs in Pak and Afghanistan and Bangladesh get butchered? what a fool you are....20-25 crore Muslims live in India..why dont they leave to their homeland..
He is ignorant person😅!?
Maybe you consider yourself inferior to him just because he speaks good English, may have a degree and have some arguments.
I don't consider myself less intellectual than haim, so I highly disagree with him and reject his opinions
A degree or English doesn't make anyone superior , Rahul Gandhi is big example of it
Him very soon: Borders are unconstitutional.
borders are made by people to rule people.
This is what you expect from a educated person.
So he wants us to take Pakistani Muslims as well really??
Any layman can easily destroy his logic.
But you won’t share it with us?
Yes, then why divide countries for muslim.basic questions
@@nagarajpn9279 entire comment section has already done it
Exactly. Seeing the title I thought that this man might have valid points. I can at least try to listen. But few minutes into the video it was clearer than anything that he is talking utter bullcrap. Too bad it might polarize some uninformed people.
The only thing I agree is about the Cut-off date of CAA. If it is not updated then CAA would be rendered useless within next one year
Like father like son. A convented alien. Fallen from the late lamented British Empire.
Yeh Banda depression main hai.... He needs serious check.
Pakistan is coming up with CAA as well, he should apply.
He is Rahul Gandhi as CGI
3rd generation... sad truth about our judiciary. .. imatured person will get direct entry in jidiciary.. 🤔
Itihaas gavah hai that minorities are safe with Hindus, but Hindus are not safe as minority. Once you understand this fact, everything will start making sense about CAA
So how you are alive in Mughal Raj and Muslim rulers?tbh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta tha ?
South india meh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta?
Indonesia meh Hindu -Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta??
Malaysia meh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta?
Arab countries meh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta vaha toh dictatorship hai aur economy bhi india pe dependent nhi hai kisshi tarah seh?
African countries india meh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta?
Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Tajikistan meh Hindu-Muslim kiyyu nhi hotta?
Hindu Muslim Mughal ke time agar nahi hua to itne sare mandir hindu ke kisne tode? Itne sare conversion kaun karwaya? Hindu Muslim nahi hua to kashmir se Kashmiri pandit ko kyu nikala gaya? Jis Indonesia ki tum baat kar rahe ho wo kabhi hindu country hua karta tha. Waha aaj bhi khudai mein mandir hi milte hai. @@videoediting4907
@@videoediting4907Pakistan aur Bangladesh mein hindu population dekh lo kitna tha aur kitna reh Gaya aur bharat mein muslim population dekh lo kitna tha aur kitna badh gaya hai.
Aapki Jaankari sahi nahi lagati hai
South India mei khoob hai Hindu Muslim
Rest all other countries, you mentioned, Hindu lives as a second-class citizen in those country under the shadow of Islamic rule, with limited to restricted religious and social freedom.
The biggest genocide of human history was done by 1000 years of Islamic rule over India
Please go find a country where majority population is fighting a legal case against minority population to reclaim their religious or cultural site. That tells you about the tolerance of Hindu community. Can you imagine the reverse scenario. Sir tan se juda ho jata ek hee baar mei.
@@knowledgevista596 Tuh hi bata kitna tha Pakistan aur Bangladesh meh aur abh kitna hai lekin data Pakistan and Bangladesh census ka honna chahiye bjp ka brainwash wala data nhi
No one including any Chief ministers of country can appose law made by people of India(Parliament)
CM has no right to oppose its own people.
CAA is central government matter not state.
So why supreme court not taking strict actions against such chief ministers who are opposing CAA.
This is not unconstitutional???
Sir is Mentioning Iran, is Iran a neighbour of India?
Does Afghanistan seems to you a neighbouring country, LOL
@@s.a.n.t.a.a We Welcome Everyone except M*slims
@@s.a.n.t.a.a
Yes it is, it share it's border with India.
@@s.a.n.t.a.alol look at the map of india kid
It shares a border with Afghanistan , it's a neighbouring country
It is
@@s.a.n.t.a.a
It will be amazing to see him arguing before CJI (his father) on the petition to be heard in Supreme Court on CAA! Very rarely it can happen in this world!!
He won’t be able to present his case in court infront of the CJI because it would lead to conflict of interest
That's how indian judiciary works.
@@Adityakishor09 From his speech we can easily understand thought process of his family.
One more thing we have collegium system. He will be Judge of Supreme Court and subsequently CJI.Wtf😅
Muslims have 57 countries .
But for Hindus, Sikh only one country.
@@dhirajjha2439but what's the fault of Indian Muslims if there is 57 M.country.
@@simmiboutique no one snatching citizenship of Muslims of our country.
This act only gives citizenship of persecuted minority of 3 country.
How can the act be secular when the partition itself wasn't secular?
Future chief justice of India
Next time he will argue the terrorists in court.He is talking nonsense.
then prove him wrong
yes whatsApp uncle
@@AcaDhrix Lol already comments have proved him wrong. Go and read.
Kasab was actually defended by his lawer till the end and everyone know he did terror attacks @@AcaDhrix
@@Searchforfulltruth911 this is the well structured procedure of law in bharat, it I'd supposed to happen this this way and , judiciary can not work on "everybody knows", every criminal is given a chance to prove himself even if the person is a a serious terr_st as you mentioned, this is what makes our judiciary unbiased.
Alright, who is this Joker?
A joker might consider someone with intellect to be a joker
judiciary ka Rahul Gandhi.
Present cj ke nepo kid😂😅
CJI son,future CJI
@@nerf2752 WOW! What a comparison 😂
Genius talk. We should not discriminate basing on religions.
Andh and gobar gangs will never understand what he is saying.
and puncture putra will understand?
First ask muslims to stop discrimination. Caa won't even come into picture if muslims starts acting like normal human beings
Everything was fine until he tried to compare Pakistan with England. He lost me there.
Permit System reminds me the story of Tara Singh and Sakina from which Gadar 2 was made.
I don't know if this comment will ever reach you Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud but I sincerely thank you for talking about such sensitive topic while our country is going through such a religious fanaticism wave and its a shame that most of my beloved citizen are so opposed to the very thoughts of listing to something that doesn't align with there own views, especially just because of your upbringing and completely disregards the amount of work and hours you have put in to get your qualifications.
Gazab likha hai.
I am not even Mad, I am impressed.
Turns have tabled kar diya
Mostly it's due to the brainwashing done by Godi Media
Looks like not even one interested in commenting on biased Brut lol
Coz everyone knows brut is biased..only leftards and libtards gather here..its perfect echo chamber for them
Exactly.. but when you look at end credit names of every video you will know the reason :)
@@shivaram_ That was an eye-opener, mate.
@@shivaram_ever heard of discrimination? You don't have to hear it cause you're doing it.
@@shivaram_and don't use gojo as pfp if you're gonna act exactly opposite of him.
Everyone is going on about how he's with an "agenda", but i honestly wanna know the ans to the examples he gave at the end, cause that is really puzzling to me as well. And why shouldn't the refugees who are atheists, agnostics etc. be included in CAA?
What I understand is, CAA is an incomplete Act, wherein you identify with any one of the given religions and seek refuge in india. It doesnt matter what you believe in. There are so many different ways a Refugee related Act can be made, but gov planned to make CAA which is purely mainstream religion based. Well there's that..
And I also think it is necessary for a conservative country like india to take care of mainstream religious needs. Many countries used to do that, for example the arab countries. It keeps the harmony within the country without very serious cultural/religious clashes. Even developed countries like us or uk have trouble with unaccounted refugees, when their security system fail. Our country's not having even half the security or police force when it comes to such clashes, so religious selection do sound more harmoniuos in my opinion
very easily ignored why the partition happened. would have been better if he read some unconstitutional history along with the his constitutional law
This entitled nepokid is talking down on us today. Tomorrow if Collegium system stays he will become another judge
तेरा बाप सड़क छाप रहा होगा या अनपढ़ इसलिये तू रो रहा है? Is it his fault that he's born in CJI family? So, according to you, he should be an illiterate since his dad is educated? Or, he should endorse your venomous sanghi agenda? Do you also have problem with doctor's son becoming doctor? And, What nepotism are you talking about? Are you blind? Can you not see likes of Jay Shah in BJP whose number will run into hundreds?
why dont you take him down. he is out there doing his job he has earned it youre just a comment on youtube.
@@causereasons.4826 earned nothing, inherited privilege, that's how and why a boring mediocre woke has gone viral. He has already been taken down, crawl out of your bubble snowflake and you'll know
@@causereasons.4826it's called nepotism kiddo he will be in future CJI such broken and woke our judiciary is