Should You Buy a Mazda CX-30? Good But The Bigger Brother Wins!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
  • A Master Automobile Technician Reviews the 2022 Mazda CX-30.
    So Should you buy a Mazda CX-30? The Mazda CX-30 is a small compact crossover from Mazda sharing a lot with the Mazda CX-50.
    It's very small and has that nice Mazda quiet refined interior but it does have one problem. It compromises on size and makes it's bigger brother the Mazda CX-5 sound like a much better deal.
    TCCN Automotive Inc.
    Toyota and Lexus Specialist Repair
    Visit www.tccnautomotive.com to schedule your appointment today.
    Check out the Main channel :
    / thecarcarenut
    Recommended Tools:
    Basic Scan Tool amzn.to/3Jm6aom
    Very good DIY Scan Tool amzn.to/3zF7dvH
    Advanced Scan tool amzn.to/3q3L3QQ
    Spill Free Coolant Replacement Funnel amzn.to/3uJfKxm
    Sun roof drain cleaning tool amzn.to/3GMDlQ9
    Good DIY Torque Wrench 1/2" amzn.to/3gE9bnw
    Wireless Apple CarPlay for Toyota\Lexus amzn.to/3uKElSo
    Very Good Triple Camera Borescope amzn.to/3MrgFs0
    *as an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    Follow the channel on Social Media :
    / thecarcarenut
    / thecarcarenut
    Check out the channel Merch store
    / @thecarcarenut
    Support the channel on Patreon:
    / thecarcarenut
    Make a one time donation to the channel:
    www.paypal.me/CCNdonate
    Check out the amazon store:
    www.amazon.com/shop/thecarcarenut
    *as an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    #thecarcarenut #thecarcarenutremix #mazdacx30 #mazda
    0:00 Intro
    0:58 Technical Review - Under the Hood
    4:00 Technical Review - Under Car
    6:35 Exterior Review
    10:06 Interior Review
    16:28 Should you buy a Mazda CX-30?
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 401

  • @mfurtaw
    @mfurtaw ปีที่แล้ว +202

    I ordered a CX-30 as I'm more of a car guy, but have to deal with Colorado winters. This is basically a lifted Mazda 3. I didn't want an SUV, which all look cookie cutter to me. Plus, this gets better gas mileage than the CX-5 and 50. And I have no kids, so the small backseat is not an issue.

    • @Corrupted-file
      @Corrupted-file ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Same.

    • @HistoricalWeapons
      @HistoricalWeapons ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why not Toyota

    • @jms1086
      @jms1086 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I test drove both, and I’m buying a CX-30. Amazing car.

    • @kaileysweeney4240
      @kaileysweeney4240 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I have the CX-30 Turbo, it is a beautiful, fun to drive hatchback

    • @maybefrank8345
      @maybefrank8345 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Agreed. It’s the whole point of a crossover, right!?

  • @manitouroy
    @manitouroy ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Love your videos but disagree on this one. It is simply not appropriate to criticize a small vehicle for being small. It would be like criticizing an Escalade for being big. I chose a small vehicle that is nimble to drive and easy to park. By your standard a Subaru Crosstrek is inferior to a Forrester, a Corolla is inferior to a Camry, etc. I compared the CX-30 to, Crosstrek, Honda HRV, Toyota CorollaCross and CX-30 is far superior to those.
    The reason the CX-30 is not much less than a CX-5 is because of it's high quality and features which are not available in other small vehicles.

    • @tomaskroupakkfoto4132
      @tomaskroupakkfoto4132 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And as a bonus is cx-30 just more driver oriented car in comparsion to cx-5. Cx-5 is boring.

    • @shalashaskaa8
      @shalashaskaa8 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Think you missed the point, it has the same engine, same trans, same interior, 3mpg difference, spend 3 grand more and get the cx5?

  • @williamhenderson1161
    @williamhenderson1161 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Nope, I test drive both (similarly equipped) and easily chose the CX30, better tech and a better drive. Love it!

    • @ukuskota4106
      @ukuskota4106 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What better tech was decicive?

    • @BigBadJohnDiesel
      @BigBadJohnDiesel ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The tech is the same across the board in all Mazdas! The differences lie in what trim level you went with!

  • @MrRobRobRobRobRob
    @MrRobRobRobRobRob ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I think you missed the mark a bit on this. Buyers of the CX-30 were looking at the Mazda 3 and realized that the CX-30 is a lifted Mazda 3 hatchback. It’s got a fun factor that is hard to define and is gone when you hit the size of the CX-5. I’ve owned a CX-30 Turbo for 1.5 years, and I feel like they made this car for me. It’s literally exactly what I was looking for. I love the Mazda 3 hatchback but hate how low to the ground it is. This fixes that, and gives me nominally more trunk space. I had an Audi stick shift before this, and I am not kidding when I say my CX-30 turbo is much more fun to drive. Years ago I had an Acura TSX, and this rivals that in the fun to drive department. If you’re looking for a fun, sporty hot hatch type car, you have to check this car out

    • @djpayton9128
      @djpayton9128 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i used to own a RSX-S in my late teens. This feels like the grown up version of that in some ways. still fun, premium and affordable!

    • @satsuki5279
      @satsuki5279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I currently own a 2009 Acura TSX wtih 220,000 miles on her. I am looking into CX30 as my next vehicle.

    • @cherimcdonald8107
      @cherimcdonald8107 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm considering the Mazda CX30. However, I live in South Texas and have 100+ temps for months at a time. How's the AC?

    • @spasmicwaves
      @spasmicwaves หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cherimcdonald8107 Bought one 3 days ago, tinted windows help keep the car cool and the AC works great!!!

    • @johnrobinson9974
      @johnrobinson9974 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I bought my CX-30 for exactly the same reason. Liked the Mazda 3 hatchback but too cramped and low to the ground - this fixes that. The thing I don't understand is AMD mentions CX-5 or CX-50 when talking about the CX-30. The CX-30 is built on the Mazda 3 platform, and so is the CX-50. Exactly Mazda 3. CX-50 was not built on the CX-5 platform, the independent suspension is totally different than the 3, CX-30 and CX-50's torsion bar rear suspension. AMD reviewed the 5 and knows it has different suspension yet he keeps talking about the CX-30 in terms on the CX-50. I love his reviews but this one kind of makes the wrong comparison. His complaints about the window size and other cosmetic points he makes are also comparing them to the CX-5 and CX-50 and he should be comparing it only to the Mazda 3.

  • @Dhspat
    @Dhspat ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I just bought a 2023 Mazda CX-30 2 weeks ago. Love it so far. It’s big enough for me as I drive alone mostly. It has AWD which was very important to me.

    • @zhila5958
      @zhila5958 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dear Sir. How is the car holding up a year later? would appreciate your insight

    • @cherimcdonald8107
      @cherimcdonald8107 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Congrats on your purchase and I'm thinking of the same year and model. How is the AC?

  • @schillage8
    @schillage8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The turbo cx30 is incredibly fun to drive. Nice blend of fast, comfy, nimble and stable

  • @SMHeath-vb5fk
    @SMHeath-vb5fk ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Really enjoying my CX 30 Turbo so far. It is the perfect car to have in the city…a bit large actually, but worth a few inches for the smooth ride.

  • @CC-bu1uj
    @CC-bu1uj ปีที่แล้ว +18

    You obviously have not driven both CX30 and CX5 to understand the difference between them, because the CX5 maybe bigger, but the CX30 drives like a luxury sports car with the SUV capability comparing to CX50 which drives more like a standard SUV. Besides, not everybody want a big SUV.
    As for the exterior, the CX50 looks completely different to CX30 in terms of size and design, it's a different car altogether. Those of us who own CX30s actually appreciate the simplistic yet elegant design of the Mazda’s signature KODO Motion philosophy, unlike your careless comment, Mazda put a lot of thought and effort into this sophisticate design.

    • @saeednrzadeh4754
      @saeednrzadeh4754 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I have 23 Cx5 GT and 22 Cx30 GS (Canada), I am 100% agree with you , Cx30 is amazingly well tuned in terms of driving dynamics.

  • @joshuadelaughter7968
    @joshuadelaughter7968 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    IMO the smaller size is a plus vs the CX-5 rather than a downside. I prefer the maneuverability, turn radius, and easy parking of smaller cars. They also give a feeling of having more control. I'd sacrifice the extra space any day for that. Heck, I'd pay $2k more for the CX-30 rather than the reverse.

    • @Gerald0613
      @Gerald0613 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not to mention the CX5 is a small dick car

    • @MrEricmopar
      @MrEricmopar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Better mileage and also fits in a tiny one car garage better than a CX-5.

    • @ALEZANDAR
      @ALEZANDAR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When I got home from the dealer I couldn't believe how much easier it was to park the cx-30 vs my previous 2008 Honda CRV!

  • @dionnewhite3369
    @dionnewhite3369 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    I am now on my second CX30. It's the perfect city car! Not too big, not too small. I have also had passengers of all heights in the rear seats (everyone was comfortable) and filled the rear compartment with loads of stuff (I do wish it was a touch bigger). The car drives so smoothly, is extremely responsive and handles very well. This person seems biased towards larger vehicles and against smaller CUVs. I also test drove a CX5 and hated it...
    Everyone has their opinions and he is providing an alternate view, but this was review was unbalanced imo.

    • @andrec3697
      @andrec3697 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      100%

    • @ottodepaz7187
      @ottodepaz7187 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes

    • @georgesmith4639
      @georgesmith4639 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I test drove a used CX-5 recently and the seat bottoms are too hard.

    • @kevinstarski1598
      @kevinstarski1598 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree. I like the guy but he harped too much on this personal bias of his...should just stick to the mechanics, in my opinion

    • @ALEZANDAR
      @ALEZANDAR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally agree! incidentally the $2000 difference between the two cars is a lie; more like $6000 difference! for being a mechanic he seems to miss the most important point, in that the handling and comfort of the ride are shared by the same engine and dynamics of both cars! the only difference is the price and a few inches of interior space. My 85 yr old mother loves siting in the car!
      Sorry, but I refuse to pay several thousand dollars more for a few more inches of interior space!! I am 6 ft tall, and have no problem with the comfort and fitting into the tight space of the cx-30!

  • @differencemaker242
    @differencemaker242 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Reviewers seem to think every customer owns a farm and has 6 kids. No! More and more Americans have either 1 or no kids.

    • @SirDiesAlot89
      @SirDiesAlot89 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have 2 kids.

    • @vikvc
      @vikvc 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My partner is about 1.5m tall and our kid is not even 5 yo. Currently considering the CX-30 given its price and lifted body for the Canadian roads. It helps that I am 1.66m tall so the driver's seat never locates far into the knees of back passengers.

  • @wiwatchguy8798
    @wiwatchguy8798 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Your review was forwarded to me by TH-cam and I watched all of your reviews on the CX-30, CX-5 and CX-50. I really enjoy your perspective on the mechanical end of the vehicles. Also, in full disclosure, I have a CX-30 Premium Turbo.
    Again, while I appreciate your perspective on the mechanical end of the vehicle, I think you’re well off base about quite a lot and you even contradict yourself. You said for $2000 more you get a lot more, but then you said it’s the same vehicle. What you should have said was for $2000 more you get more room. For me, at the trim level and model I have, it was a $3000 difference. I could have easily afforded a CX-5, but I preferred both the interior and exterior design of the CX-30 and I happily pocketed the $3000, plus tax, plus interest since I didn’t needs a CX-5.
    With regards to the exterior, I think it’s pretty close and there are design elements I like about both. However, I think you really missed the mark on the CX-30’s exterior design. With regards to the interior though I don’t think there’s a comparison as the CX-30 simply looks better. It’s more minimal and streamlined. The CX-5’s shifter is too far forward and upward tilting and the air vent stand out too much. Also, you make too much of the infotainment setup. It’s VERY easy to use, even with Apple Car Play, and if you have the vehicle for just a short time i’s easy to use without even looking. And my sleek screen is void of any fingerprints and looks as pristine as the day I took the plastic protector off of it.
    Still on the interior, I don’t have a family and I didn’t need the extra room. At most I’ll have two additional people in the vehicle and the third person is smaller such that they comfortably fit in the back. Fair game that it’s not a large backseat area, but it’s serviceable and not everybody needs that much room or has that many people they’re carting around.
    Speaking of room at the back, I completely disagree with your assessment of the back cargo area. PLENTY of room back there. Sure the CX-5 has more room, but do you need it? It always amazes me how reviews make such a big deal about such spaces providing all the measurements. I mean how much junk do people have that they need to haul around all the time?
    Overall, I think you make some fair points about the backseat space if you have a family or need a vehicle that regularly shuttles three to four passengers. And I think it’s also fair to say that Mazda’s own models can be it’s own competition. However, you’re really overstating that case and contradicting yourself in the process whilst also missing other finer points about the CX-30. Is it perfect? No, but I’ll happily continue to enjoy mine without wishing I had a CX-5 or even a CX-50 which would have cost at minimum $3000+ more.

    • @ottodepaz7187
      @ottodepaz7187 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Perfect description enjoy your car , I don’t have one but I liked it when I was searching for a car for my son 👍🏽

  • @T16R0N
    @T16R0N ปีที่แล้ว +94

    I also have chosen CX-30 over CX-5 back in 2020. It is 2 years and I an very happy with the car. No build-quality or technical issues so far. CX-30 is 200 kg lighter then CX-5, but has the same engine. CX-30 drives better. It is built on newer more efficient platform. CX-5 is noticeably solver, especially on inclines. In CX-5 you only get bigger trunk. Cabin space is very similar. Considering the size of a small family, smaller but more nimble CX-30 is better.

    • @joshuadelaughter7968
      @joshuadelaughter7968 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah my girlfriend and I just test drove one of these and a CX-5 and we agreed the CX-30 felt way nicer to drive.

    • @MrRobRobRobRobRob
      @MrRobRobRobRobRob ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yep. Totally agree. He missed a fun factor that is hard to quantify. The CX-5 feels like an SUV. The CX-30 feels like a hot hatch, and it flies with its large engine in its small body. This is a lifted Mazda 3, not a small CX-5

    • @RockandRollWoman
      @RockandRollWoman ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The CX30 is as much like a sports car as you can get from an SUV - or CUV - but I couldn't find a sports car with the safety features the CX30 has. It's much more fun to drive than its big brother, and it's easier to park in the city. It also costs less! I'm going to some concerts with the savings.

    • @jbm0866
      @jbm0866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RockandRollWoman Not when things like the Porsche Macan GTS, Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio and others (even Ferrari has an "suv" now) exist. I will say the CX-30 is the sportiest psuedo SUV mere mortals can afford. Like others have said, it's basically a lifted Mazda 3 and retains most of that cars nimble, fun to drive nature.

  • @snakevergil
    @snakevergil ปีที่แล้ว +70

    I have a carbon edition cx30 and I’ll tell you why not a cx-5… why does no one mention the tech is so much more outdated in that car over this car? The knob and system is like 10 years old. It’s the same on the cx-3 and current gen mx-5 has…. The cx-5 also looks so much more plain Jane. The cx-30 is beautiful

    • @jesussantiagobravo6220
      @jesussantiagobravo6220 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have to agree with you!! I have a 2023 carbon edition cx30 and I love everything about it. The red seats are the perfect touch. My father got a 2024 cx5 and it’s feels so outdated compared to my 2023 despite some “updates” they did to the cx5

  • @jamesdavis6036
    @jamesdavis6036 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I purchased 2022 CX-30 Turbo Premium Soul Red white interior with 2,600 miles a week ago. Put 500 miles on it since. I also test drove the non turbo. If your a "driver" turbo is the only option.
    When you accelerate in a non-turbo, the tranny is constantly trying to search for a gear to accommodate its lack of power.
    The Adaptive Headlights in conjunction with auto high beams is amazing. Night driving is now lit up like Yankee stadium at all times. Should be mandatory. Would save many lives. Rides like a luxury car. At 80 MPH almost as quiet as a Lincoln Continental. Stability is AMAZING! Plenty of rear leg room with the front seats set at the mid-way point. My 6' tall son got in back & his knees were 4" from front seat.
    They always show someone getting in the rear with the front seats all the way back. Misleading! Great for a family of four. You most certainly can shut off nanny features. Infotainment system is amazing!!!
    Took me a day to learn. Bose stereo sounded rich & deep however I wish it had a subwoofer volume level. Increased oil consumption in the turbo is very rare. Mazda has addressed this. All models produced from June 2022 to the present are fine. On models before, Mazda is repairing on a case by case basis. If you hate the cladding I guess you shouldn't buy. Remember, when your driving you can't see it. After I detailed cladding saved me time & energy. Oh yeah, Zoom freaking Zoom!

    • @JHam17
      @JHam17 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is cladding?

    • @jamesdavis6036
      @jamesdavis6036 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JHam17 Black trim on the outside.
      Some don't like the looks.

    • @armandovaleri9942
      @armandovaleri9942 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @james - You are right on point with your comments. So well said, thank for sharing.

  • @nats50
    @nats50 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Size doesn't really matter for some people. It's subjective and depends on what it is used for. As in the saying, "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder."

  • @sgrant9814
    @sgrant9814 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I bought a 30 premium and when looking , tried the 5 and went with the 30 as i prefer smaller vehicles, did not need the back seat and the 30 was WAY more fun to drive than the 5. I have the na engine and regularly get 34-36 m'g highway at legal to slightly above legal speeds.

  • @IsaacLoven
    @IsaacLoven ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yes the rear suspension is a bit old school, but Mazda has tuned so good there is no significant downside.

  • @raycollington4310
    @raycollington4310 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    When you consider the salesman's job is to conceal the reason you should not buy the product, this is great public service broadcasting and so informative AMD. The channels are developing nicely and not only entertain, they are educating us. I opened a truck fleet workshop in 1980, the guys were never happy with my OCD and continually washing the floor etc. Good on you for having standards and keeping the shop beautiful, I love it. Best wishes to you all for a successful future, please let me know when you introduce a customer collection service that reaches London, UK.

  • @SeekingTruthAnd
    @SeekingTruthAnd ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent, fair and honest review. Thank you. I am now subscribing this channel.

  • @natewynn344
    @natewynn344 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is the 8th review I saw on cx30. I thought I saw the best reviews until I see this one. Kudos!!

  • @inctru
    @inctru ปีที่แล้ว +80

    I chose a 2022 CX-30 CE (Carbon Edition) over the CX-5 CE or Premium earlier this year because I liked the fact that it was smaller. The CX-5 & CX-50 are too large for my taste/lifestyle. I'm happy with my CX-30 purchase thus far - no build-quality or technical issues to report. I had to black-out the trim, roof, roof rails & other parts on mine to make the thick black cladding & bumper look like a more natural part of the vehicle. Great little crossover if you don't want a larger vehicle & don't plan to put people in the back seat area.

    • @greggf6831
      @greggf6831 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey do you still like the car? Have any complaints? Is visibility poor? I live in NYC so i'm considering it

    • @inctru
      @inctru ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@greggf6831 No problems to report after owning my CX-30 CE for about 9 months now. Coming from a sedan, it took a bit of getting used to with regards to the CX-30 shorter-height side windows & a bit more limited rear visibility, but I have adapted just fine (& rear/side blind spot monitoring is great to help with that). The ride quality is much nicer & quieter/insulated than my 2020 Corolla SE sedan was, & no annoying inside dash/door rattles & vibrations like my Corolla was rife with (among other problems I ended up having with it, sadly enough). The headlight visibility at night is also *much better* in my CX-30 than my previous Corolla was. I'm happy with my CX-30 purchase.

    • @greggf6831
      @greggf6831 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks

    • @N2LADIES55
      @N2LADIES55 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@inctru I've seen some people complain about visibility but I assume the blind spot monitoring and rear cross traffic alert would solve that problem.

    • @wiwatchguy8798
      @wiwatchguy8798 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@N2LADIES55I don’t have the rear traffic cross alert, but I have do have the blind spot monitoring. It’s not a fail safe as you have to still look over shoulder. That said visibility it’s a huge issue in my opinion. I’d say about 15 months and 28,000 miles since I bought mine I’ve only had two instances where someone was in my blind spot and I did know it. I consider myself a very alert driver though and so it wasn’t an issue. And I would add that the blind spot monitor notifies you on the heads up display as well. Overall the vehicle has some great safety features that are new to me, but they do really work as intended.

  • @mikenelson8351
    @mikenelson8351 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best review that I have found. Thanks (from Australia. And may He give you peace)

  • @onenikkione
    @onenikkione ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great review, thank you for taking the time to do these car reviews. I really appreciate your mechanical knowledge and thorough review. As of April 2023, the difference in base price btw the CX 30 -vs- CX 5 is now $3700. My wife loves the look & size of this small SUV and recently purchased one.

  • @davemarks7322
    @davemarks7322 ปีที่แล้ว

    Marvelous video, answered questions I didn't even know I had. Thankyou sir.

  • @Zbeeeb
    @Zbeeeb ปีที่แล้ว +23

    i owned a 2021 cx 30 turbo and loved it. then when i saw the cx 50 i had to get it and actually did and currently have the turbo model in zircon colour. after only 5000 km i regret letting go the 30, the cx 30 wa way faster and more agile and way less harsh on bumpy roads. i actually am letting go of my lease to get back the exact cx 30 turbo i had...lol i know

    • @AppealToHeaven
      @AppealToHeaven หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm thinking of switching from my 2016 3 iGrandTouring Hatchback to an SUV and was leaning towards CX-50 vs. 5 (for the added space) but people here are convincing me I need to give the CX-30 another look.

  • @tristar3005
    @tristar3005 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I went with a CX30 as I wanted something that could still be fun to drive while allowing for a variety of outdoor activities (camping, kayaking, hiking, motorcycle trailer, etc). We get decent snow where I am so the AWD as default is nice. It's just me and my son so extra room isn't a huge issue. It'll fit the two of us and plenty of camping gear and toys for a decent road trip while retaining some fun driving characteristics.

  • @morgano29
    @morgano29 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes you should, just got a 2023 cx 30 turbo premium plus love it , got everything you could ask for and more

  • @marknucci5090
    @marknucci5090 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks again for the honest assessment

  • @aus_life
    @aus_life ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The CX30 was released a couple of years before the Cx50, and so it’s better to say that the CX50 is a bigger version of the CX30 than the CX30 is a smaller CX50

    • @interceptor847
      @interceptor847 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Potato Potata

    • @john9933
      @john9933 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He literally said that in the video...

    • @johnrobinson9974
      @johnrobinson9974 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He missed the boat with this review- both the CX-30 and CX-50 are built on the Mazda 3's platform, not the CX-5. Nothing has been built on the Cx-5's platform with independent suspension - they all have the 3's torsion-bar rear suspension. He reviewed the 5 so how did he forget the platform? He should compare it to the 3 and other small compact SUVs, not the bigger, different CX-5 platform.

  • @dwnrange7812
    @dwnrange7812 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I commend your outstanding analysis and review, very thorough, truly professional, highly technical but still comprehensible to the average car buyer.

  • @Mazdatechsenior
    @Mazdatechsenior ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I’m senior tech at mazda and this cars are great. I’m not saying that because I work at mazda, but I want to get one a mazda my self. I drive a 430 myself.. quality is great is not to cheap and it’s not too expensive. Plus the skyactive engine is great and reliable. Yea some older models have head issues but Thaths due to the manufacture when building them. Amazing cars I recommend them

    • @khelgarironfist3301
      @khelgarironfist3301 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How are the Skyactiv-x engines though? Similarly reliable? I know they got a compressor but still. You get those with 186hp in EU instead of 2.5 atmospheric in USA. Probably made to reduce emissions to fit in EU which answers the question by itself i guess.

  • @dd4886
    @dd4886 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This small suv with the 2.5 turbo 4 is a beast!! I wish manufacturers made more of such small sized yet high displacement suvs...

  • @jms1086
    @jms1086 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I appreciate your informative videos. When I first saw the CX-30 on the road, I did a double take - it looked sharp! It is very stylish in my opinion, inside and out. I test drove a few different Mazda models, including the CX-5. I loved all of them for different reasons. However, the CX-30 turbo blew me away. In the city during heavy traffic, I feel like it maneuvers a little better than the larger models and that’s what sold me. The back seats are a bit tight, but it wasn’t a deal breaker for me.

  • @Mau105
    @Mau105 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant analysis, and you beat others to the obvious comparison.

  • @thecardoc100
    @thecardoc100 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    How about a review from a Master Technician that owns a CX-30? Of course I'm going to come across in favor of it, nobody wants to think that they made a poor choice. VBG. I have 19,000 miles on my 2021 Skyactive G 2.5l Non-Turbo, CX-30, it is notable that there are very few changes between the two years. My fuel mileage is a combined 32mpg, and I get as high as the low 39's on a highway trip with the AC on. So, there is a decent difference in fuel economy between the CX-30 and the CX-50. The majority of my usage has me solo in the vehicle. When I do have a passenger it's either just the wife in the right front seat, or it could be my granddaughter in the right rear in her car seat. The rear seat dimensions have not proven to be an issue up to this point. Considering I got the select model that listed close to 27K and I was out the door at just over $24K I judged it to be the best value for money and I have not been disappointed. I'll let you know how this holds up during the next ten years and the expected 400K+ miles.

    • @garrettw99
      @garrettw99 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you get the employee discount? You got a great deal, even if that was before prices went up.

    • @thecardoc100
      @thecardoc100 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@garrettw99 No. Not an employee. I had a lot of time that I could spend shopping around.

  • @MH-vw9ni
    @MH-vw9ni ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW just WOW this was a great review especially since I'm thinking about purchasing the CX-30, CX-5 or the CX-50. Thanks fella.

  • @garden_hooligan
    @garden_hooligan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Appreciate the frank comments about this vehicle and its big brother!

  • @tp8404
    @tp8404 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video, I think the cx30 was meant to be a higher vehicle than the mazda 3. However as you point out so well, it makes more sense to spend an extr 2k and get the 5.

  • @peterc.jordan2420
    @peterc.jordan2420 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review AMD!

  • @WhiteRosez007
    @WhiteRosez007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello. I want to thank you for your channel! You give wonderful reviews for the mechanically inclined and for those are looking for options and style. I pretty much agree with you on the CX-30 when I was car shopping. So I did by a 2024 CX-30 at the lowest trim level price point on the lot which was the Select S. The dealer really worked with me to get out of 2021 Honda Passport lease as lost all equity. I am not new to small cars as I've been a Honda owner for many years. I was considering the CX-5 however it was $4,000 + more due to the inflation. So I am in my 60s and single. I love this sporty CX 30!! I don't never think I'll go back to Honda. This car is so quiet comparatively and the ride smoother with few quirks upshifting. It's perfect for me and I'm 5'7". A friend of mine who is 5'9 sat up front and has two middle school children who fit perfectly in the backseat. Just have to adjust the front seats to accommodate others. I do agree getting out that back seat door can be a struggle for adults. In 3 weeks of owning it, my city mileage improved to 24mpg.. highway to 33mpg going 75-80mph. Not thrilled about the outer body design on any Mazda but i can live with it. I would like try a CX-50 maybe in the future of the CX-5 is no longer around.
    PS... But I saw on the Mazda website that the CX-5 has 187 HP engine but the cx30 has a 191 HP... I am no mechanic.

  • @ij6708
    @ij6708 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your review and opinion. Unfortunately too many touchy owners down in those comments who were just looking for validation but didn't get any

    • @johnrobinson9974
      @johnrobinson9974 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We love AMD, but this is the first review where he keeps comparing the orange (Mazda 3, CX-30, CX-50 built on the 3's platform with torsion bar rear suspension) with the apple of CX-5's independent suspension built on an older platform. Buyers of the CX-30 were looking at the Mazda 3 or Mazda 3 hatchback and other small compact SUVs, not the Mazda 5 (for the vast majority I think.). We also didn't care about car seats - maybe we just liked the zoom of the 3 with that great interior and features - I mostly put the rear seats down to expand my trunk space but 4 adults sit quite comfortable in the car as well AMD is usually spot on - but he's comparing the wrong fruit here.

  • @msBatFink
    @msBatFink ปีที่แล้ว

    glad im not the only one to pick that ‘something’ is not right..its the only reason stopping me from buying one..great review..from Sydney Australia ❤🇦🇺❤️

  • @StormBringer-
    @StormBringer- ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for posting

  • @3i00
    @3i00 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hello! you do a really good job in there! on my side I took 2021 Cx-30 FWD with 2.0 NA automatic transmission with the matrix led lights from Romania. price was 24.5K euros. Base model was around 22k euros and in comparation with his big brother cx-5 with a starting price from 25k euros (but very very base model 2.0 NA manual, without any fancy extra options like: color display, like automatic AC and other small details that cx-30 has). Indeed the space on the back is quite small, I would rather say it is enough for small teenager family. Personally we are only 2 and we have plenty of room in the front and in the trunk for baggages and other stuff. For me was quite impressing to find 2.0 aspirated engine. Here in Europe nowadays it is a rush among car manufactures and a continuous race on developing small engine sizes (3 cyl) supercharged which from my point of view is not reliable on long time ownership.(it is quite hard to buy a decent new car these times) so for me, personally was the best compromise to have my first ever owned car that I am thinking to keep it for a long time. I don't have too much experience with Asian market cars but since almost 2 years Mazda managed to change my mind about the quality of their cars and in the future when family grows we will look on bigger brothers cx-5 or cx-60 but depending on the deals on the dealership. On my case the configuration price was 28800Euros, luckily the car was in stock (2 weeks time to delivery from Belgium, i was aiming for the premium sound system but I was supposed to wait another year for my own configuration, so I have changed my mind and took the one from stock), it was with two tone interior (blue accent) and the color was blue (totally diferent than the one in my mind). So starting from that 28800, I got a generous discount from dealership plus another discount from the Romanian state, since the car was mild hybrid and total paid price was 24500euros, so for me was a deal at that time. Now I hope that I didn't did a wrong decision taking direct injection engine and classical torque convert transmission.

  • @janvondrak1641
    @janvondrak1641 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very detailed and informative review, thanks! HOWEVER your repeated comments about how this is scaled-down version of the CX-50 seem to ignore the fact that CX-50 is a new model from 2023, while CX-30 started in 2020, really as a lifted version of the Mazda 3 hatchback. The CX-50 was another step to make a larger vehicle on the same platform.

  • @cpggoa
    @cpggoa ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Hello. Did little research. Between Mazda cx-30 and cx-5. The platforms are different. cx-30 derives its platform from 4th gen mazda3 with kodos and kai design of 2019. this platform uses more high grade steel. cx-5 platform is 3rd gen mazda platform of 2013 based on kodos design. Also, ofcourse the dimensions are different. Each has its strong points

  • @landofahhs_1
    @landofahhs_1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't thank you enough for your nice look at the bottom of the car...I would have included the location of the oil filter, but no complaints :)

  • @dimzay
    @dimzay ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good review. I tried CX30 and it feels like a hatch.

  • @MickeyCastro
    @MickeyCastro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Mazda is the perfect balance between driving experience, luxury, and reliability. To bad that they're trims get very pricy very fast :(

  • @ezeess7239
    @ezeess7239 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the fender frame is very nice in snowy areas like minnesota where salt and crap always kick up which can wear at the paint

  • @markco4911
    @markco4911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great review.

  • @EazybakeEvan
    @EazybakeEvan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i subscribed cause you blessed us at the end. i had a feeling your heart and head were in the right place, and the ending just confirmed it. bless your soul. very nice and honest review, thank you.

  • @Miami2015
    @Miami2015 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We purchased CX-30 and after 1 and half years, we are absolutely happy. I had opportunity to drive CX-5 for a month before we ordered CX-30, but didn’t like it. If I go for SUV, than CX-60😊

  • @jorgevasquez7938
    @jorgevasquez7938 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bought my wife the CX-30premium non turbo with Mazda roof racks looks great! This handles like an old BMW E36 like a go cart! Lots of fun. Engine is strong pulls well in sport mode. The Bose system (turn on auto pilot and center point) is not as bassy as my old CX-5 Gt. though. Not a lot of room. Paint is good quality. This car is better to maneuver than the Cx-5. My only complaint small gas tank feels like your always filling up. Otherwise excellent car. Also car has auto lock when you walk away plus Mazda app is free with remote auto start no subscription. Dear support is good 👍🏼

    • @thetechlibrarian
      @thetechlibrarian ปีที่แล้ว

      I miss when gas tanks where 20+ gallons

  • @hctim96
    @hctim96 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have a 2020 cx 30 select non turbo. Great car. I get 25 mpg around town and 29-32 on the highway. Only problem so far is a warning about some "internal communications error".. It is intermittent so next time to the dealer I'll have them look at it.. I hated the big black cladding so I had it painted to match the car. Good review btw, tnx.

    • @dimzay
      @dimzay ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great idea to paint cladding. I googled images and it looks great!

    • @peterc.jordan2420
      @peterc.jordan2420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dimzay and the cost to paint the cladding would be?

  • @hydrosealcanada1
    @hydrosealcanada1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a really beautiful car. Mazda has outdone itself with the cx30

  • @unless-designandarchitectu6950
    @unless-designandarchitectu6950 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! You do very nice and accurate reviews. I like them very much. You say that the Mazdas are almost all the same under the hood, but you only reviewed cars with Skyactive G motors: what's your opinion on the Skyactive X versions? I would very much like to hear you expert opinion about them.

  • @mattcarson8616
    @mattcarson8616 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Some good points, but I picked the 30 over the 5 for a few reasons. Primary one is that it is a second car with my other car a slightly bigger SUV, so when I need the bigger cargo or back seat I have it. It is cheaper, more fun to drive, handles better, actually has a (very) slightly more powerful engine output, better gas mileage. For the "go to the store or Costco or weekend get away with 2 people" is fits the bill better for me. If I had to only have one vehicle, it may have been a tougher choice. That all said, the top-of the line CX-30 is pretty pricey and not sure there are not better choices as you pass $35K+, but in the

  • @garrettw99
    @garrettw99 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you do a driving segment in future videos? I’m looking forward to you doing the Mazda 3 Turbo Premium Plus. Gotta complete the full Mazda portfolio of cars 😂

  • @Thankyou_3
    @Thankyou_3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Mazda is far superior in quality and durability than Honda especially in the last decade.

    • @pilotb18
      @pilotb18 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      durable, nooo, just better looking mechanical honda is better

    • @Thankyou_3
      @Thankyou_3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@pilotb18 Hondas have quality issues especially with engines. They are garbage in the last decade.

    • @ChrisBrown-pz2gu
      @ChrisBrown-pz2gu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Thankyou_3 really? The R18 lasts forever

    • @Thankyou_3
      @Thankyou_3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ChrisBrown-pz2guForever are those SOHC engines from late 80s and 90s from Honda. After 2000s, they pretty much became Planned Obsolescence.

    • @ChrisBrown-pz2gu
      @ChrisBrown-pz2gu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Thankyou_3 disagree completely. 6 hondas in my family. My sisters 2006 is the oldest, she has replaced nothing. Nothing. Then there is another 8th gen Civic, a 9th gen Civic, a 9th gen Accord, a 3rd gen Cr-v and a 5th gen Cr-v. No problems on any of them.

  • @emeraldgod451
    @emeraldgod451 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Does the Mazda engine have any Direct Injection Carbon build up problems? Keep up the great work AMD!!!

    • @2004cyrus
      @2004cyrus ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m on my 5th one. No issues so far.

    • @ukuskota4106
      @ukuskota4106 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I suppose every car with direct injection and without multi-point injection in an intake can have carbon problems - valve seals can leak with oil and crankcase ventilation gases can can build carbon too. The older a car - the more chance of it - a seal wears,hardens and leaks with more oil.

  • @ronboe6325
    @ronboe6325 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Odd. Sat in the front and back of a CX-30 today. I'm 6', a bit lanky, and I fit fine. With the front seat adjusted for me.

    • @ottodepaz7187
      @ottodepaz7187 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes I sat on the back seat and is decent for this small car.

  • @davidwayne9982
    @davidwayne9982 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    VERY interested in this--- I saw the one you did for the CX-50 (I think).. and curious to see this one. Others have said this one is NOT as good as the other two-- (CX-50 or CX-5).. I'd like to know YOUR thoughts on that comparison before I buy one. I DO respect your information and opinion. (yo'u're one of the FEW I trust on here).

  • @myvideos2715
    @myvideos2715 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A couple of years ago, my wife and I went hunting for a Mazda. She had her sights on the CX-5. At the dealership, we both saw the CX-30. We both agreed that it looked quirky. It wasn't until that we both sat inside of the car, that it felt cramped with no good all round vision. She settled for the CX-5.

  • @deanb3033
    @deanb3033 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey AMD, I'd love to see you do a comparison video with the cx30 vs the CHR. Which one would you choose? I sure prefer the Mazda transmission vs the CVT in the CHR. What do think ?

  • @joebruhin2098
    @joebruhin2098 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey great review, I have a Mazda 6 sig and really like it but want a AWD. Do you think the cx 30 would be as quiet in the cab as the signature 6? I don't think you get veneltaed seats in the 30 either. It is made in Mexico correction with a car made in Japan....much more comfortable!!!

  • @EzekielPrellus
    @EzekielPrellus ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I checked the stock of my local US dealer-- all the CX-30 VINs start with 3 = Made in Mexico. I have reservations about buying a Mazda built in Mexico. The CX-5 VINs all start with J = Made in Japan. I personally prefer the smaller CX-30 and found the CX-5 to be too big for my needs. I'm hesitant to purchase a CX-30 even though I really like the car.

  • @gwapogreg5837
    @gwapogreg5837 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review as always but the point of this car is its an alternative to the Mazda 3 not the bigger Cx-5 but you are right why buy this and not the CX-5.I just bought a CX-5 Kuro in Canada its almost as good as a Lexus NX for about 15k less.

  • @Braveheart0803
    @Braveheart0803 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your review, I’m planning to get this one but I was skeptical of the size since we are five in the family. I think it won’t fit . And this will lead me to watch your CX5 video 😅

    • @IsaacLoven
      @IsaacLoven ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Definitely too small for a family of five unless it is the second car in the family. Just make sure the cx5 is big enough for you. In Australia the trunk/boot is 420 litres

  • @brocklanders6969
    @brocklanders6969 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Apples/oranges. I don't think most people are cross-shopping the two. Many folks, myself included, just prefer the more sporty driving dynamics of a smaller vehicle. $2000 isn't going to make or break me. The CX-30 is more maneuverable, easier to park and handles better. It also has a little better fuel economy and is a more modern design. It looks more upscale. It is more of a "driver's car". We don't have kids. Looking at this to replace my Civic EX-T. My wife has a 2019 CX-3 Touring and loves it.

    • @WhiteRosez007
      @WhiteRosez007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with that totally.

  • @lji2000
    @lji2000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @The Car Care Nut The excessive use of RTV to seal at the factory is a bit concerning these days. One disastrous example these days is the Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ having excess RTV clogging up the oil pickup and causing engine failure.

  • @Allanwify
    @Allanwify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love CX-30, just love it.

  • @theaustralianconundrum
    @theaustralianconundrum 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bought the 2024 refreshed model with full top spec G25 (Called Astina in Australia) and only downside is the orange peel paint that the robots apply nowadays plus these must run a minimum of 95 Octane (RON) or preferably 98 here in Australia. And naturally I bought the FWD version for a saving of AU$2,500.00 and 200lbs less kerb weight over the AWD model. Not a fan of the Skyactiv G technology however only Mazda make a small gasoline SUV that does NOT have a dang DCT or CVT! Great review. 5 stars.

  • @Memo76ers
    @Memo76ers ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope you can make a video on the ‘22 Mitsubishi Outlander

  • @thesheepthemightythecrazy
    @thesheepthemightythecrazy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't have a family. it is perfect for me. smaller size is a plus. I would probably always have the back seat folded down. I think of it as a raised hatchback with higher ground clearance that I can drive in all weather.

  • @greer2005168
    @greer2005168 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Car Care Nut, I love how detailed you are in your videos. I noticed you mentioned the sealer was applied sloppy, is this a difference between a Mazda made in Mexico vs Japan? Do you recommend the JDM over the Mexico version?

    • @garrettw99
      @garrettw99 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There haven’t been any notable quality differences between USA-market vehicles made in Mexico or Japan. That goes for any brand. Vehicles that were made for third world countries, such as the Chevy Trax, THOSE are the times when you gotta know what market the car was made for.

    • @2004cyrus
      @2004cyrus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The CX-5 is made in Japan. None of these CX-30’s are made in Japan.

    • @3i00
      @3i00 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@2004cyrus cx-30 with skyactiv X engines are still being built in Japan and skyactiv g EU version was being built in Japan until 2021 from what i know

    • @2004cyrus
      @2004cyrus ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@3i00 oh cool that is good to know.

    • @IsaacLoven
      @IsaacLoven ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@2004cyrus the cx30 we get in Australia is from Japan

  • @ukuskota4106
    @ukuskota4106 ปีที่แล้ว

    When talking about Mazda sizes I remembered Mazda CX-4.😆
    It's Cx-5 but a bit lower roof and shorter

  • @peterjordan2738
    @peterjordan2738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please do a review of the 3 sedan. Love the lines but getting in and out is very problematic

  • @TariqMansour1990
    @TariqMansour1990 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I went one week ago to mazda showroom and i was impressed with interior quality and back seat space as i heard a lot of reviewers complaining about it , go check this car in person it looks really good outside and inside luxurious, and i think this car space more than enough for small family of 4

  • @wreeder
    @wreeder ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 2006 Highlander with over 200,000 miles on it. It is well maintained and in good shape. My issues it that I have a water leak on the drivers side front floor board. I have checked the sun roof drains and they are clear and when I pour water in the drain it comes out the bottom. I saw on You Tube where a guy drilled out his Pillar Post to make a drain, and another guy poured drain O in to clean out a clog. I have asked the local Toyota service dealer and he says he doesn't know anything. I have a fellow employee that when through the same thing with his 2006 Highlander and he said they never found a solution for the fix. It's a great car and I can't stand to see it get destroyed by water.

    • @jarituomi1859
      @jarituomi1859 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      6 years. 200 K miles
      Do You ever sleep?

  • @paulreaney-sygrove6751
    @paulreaney-sygrove6751 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Mazda CX30 is a brilliant stylish car with excellent build quality and a nice friendly solid driving experience we have had our CX30 Sport for over a year and it has given us a trouble free driving experience Our CX30 has all the extras you need and more with adaptive cruse control driving in town is done with your thumb on the selection control on a long trip you have all the safety features to keep you safe and it soaks up the miles with ease We don't have children and the rear of the car is a little tight but a young family with toddlers will be fine You can truly have fun in a CX30 and even relax while you drive my wife and I would recommend a CX30 to anyone in fact all the Mazda range are quality and packed with tec Bear Hull UK

  • @IsaacLoven
    @IsaacLoven ปีที่แล้ว

    The front looks great. If you add a tongue to the bottom vent you could make a new "Cars" movie.

  • @Dreihme
    @Dreihme 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I enjoy your reviews and opinions, and I think your analysis of this vs CX-5 is truly valid. However, I think most customers considering this vehicle are already familiar with the things you're going over, as well as the CX-5 and the competitive market, and what the assets and drawbacks are. These customers are probably to a point where the rear seating, huge cladding and the 'off' on the sport button are non-issues, even thought I absolutely know what you're taking about. These customers will definitely appreciate the interior, the brand reliability and the drivability of the vehicle compared to the other options within this segment, otherwise they will have already moved out of the segment. My concerns with this vehicle (given the features Mazda spent money on to attract these customers vs those they didn't spend money on in order maintain a price point), would include the potential of developing BSRs, what strategy is used to vacate water from the body and mitigate intrusion, and longevity of non-essential electronic components and systems. The brakes seem good, and I would, for example, look at the quality of the rotors and other parts that may wear more quickly than expected. You're enjoyable to listen to, but even a little bit more on the technical side of things to look into would be valuable to potential buyers in this segment.

  • @vishalthecool33
    @vishalthecool33 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wrong information. It's not 2k difference. New 2023 CX5 base model is $26,700. Difference is $26700-$22500=$4200. 2022 CX5 base model was $26250 so if you can still find 2022 model it's $26250-$22500=$3750. Also please consider sales tax on them, in my state it is 6.5% so the actual difference is $4200+$273(sales tax difference)+$50 (destination charges difference)= $4523. Not sure if there will be difference in registration charges too. If you are financing it, add difference of the interest rate too. Also the insurance rate for CX30 is cheaper than CX5

  • @MrSpock888
    @MrSpock888 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Unusable back seat? I am 5’2 and the back seat is very usable. Handling is exceptional. More maneuverable than a CX 9. Interior is way better than a CX 5.

  • @yahtadi5152
    @yahtadi5152 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    And I am here impressed on how you managed to get 23mpg from cx30 lol

  • @luis.capsalot8124
    @luis.capsalot8124 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You're absolutely right! 2 grand isn't a big difference and that's why I bought a 2020 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring and I love it. CX30 is to small for my children and it has to much cladding. Appreciate your reviews lately on the Mazdas . You're very thorough 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

    • @greggf6831
      @greggf6831 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You still loving the CX-5? Im thinking of buying it

  • @joliewu8625
    @joliewu8625 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i can see alot of car reviewers/car enthusiasts not understanding the small cuv/suv segment. but as a 5'2 person myself, something like the cx-5 can be too big, and can be unsafe for my even short folks (below 5 ft). While there are downsides of this cuv segment, it can be a win to smaller people that also want a taller ride height. I own a mazda 3 myself, and i did test drive the cx-30 while shopping, but i felt the belt line was too high, and the windows are too small like you mentioned. it made me felt crushed and not safe. Fortunately at 5'2, the mazda 3 is just perfect for me, and I do like the better driving dynamics more.

    • @IsaacLoven
      @IsaacLoven ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You did the right thing: properly test driving all of them to find what was the best fit for you. Infact the cx30 is on the same platform as the M3 just higher.

    • @joliewu8625
      @joliewu8625 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IsaacLoven 👍correct

  • @oleglishchenko4922
    @oleglishchenko4922 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here in Canada the difference between cx30 and cx5 base models is 4000, so option for CX30 might make sense for some people. Also, it's strange that you are having just 23 MPG. Some people claim to get 37 on a CX30.

  • @youwaiyap2708
    @youwaiyap2708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agree rgd the Size: in my region, I find the Mazda2, CX3 & CX30 too small for comfort. Generally, they drive pretty well v. say, Honda or Toyota equivalents but a maker like Honda tends to compete for a win in having larger cabin space 😅😅

  • @athropos
    @athropos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    CX-30 beats everything else in this segment: 2.5L baseline engine, 191HP, AWD, traditional automatic (no CVT), luxurious interior.
    This review is nuts.

  • @gabrieliacoboni6951
    @gabrieliacoboni6951 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have honestly not heard this thing compared to the 50. What I have heard it compared to is the Hatchback 3 which undercuts its sales.

  • @thomasward00
    @thomasward00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We bought my wife a new 23 CX30, Select NA... It's up to 191 HP

  • @aapinor
    @aapinor ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why shoud people get the Mazda CX30 over the heavier and bigger CX50? the answer is simple: Either young people or not a big family customers! It is a fun car with a much better driving experience than the CX50 since it has kess weight while keeping the same engine! and this is a SUV( utility) to have fun specialy since the coupes are not selling well anymore at keast here in USA because they are less practical! In relation to the shape and apearance, the CR30 looks more rugged and sportier than the CX50.. Take a look on the strets when you are driving and most time you see only one or tow passengers on a car! if you are big and being in shape is not your thing, get a bigger car! if you are young eother chronologically or in spirit, have fun and get a beeter driving exoerience in the CX30 ! Just my opinion! I am having the CX30 in my list for now! And yes, I like the shape, the design and the size!

    • @ukuskota4106
      @ukuskota4106 ปีที่แล้ว

      but in CX5 you get an independent suspension and better handling.
      And I agree on format of a car - Volvo V40 croos country is good format but model is outdated

  • @ljpr360
    @ljpr360 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have an MX-30 EV, it shares its platform with the CX-30, coming out of Hondas the windows are too small. They sacrificed design for visability, I wish it had slightly larger windows and better seats. The rest of the car & drive is fantastic!

  • @joffyjazz
    @joffyjazz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any reviews on the Subaru Crosstrek?

  • @louiscabral7306
    @louiscabral7306 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really would like to know your opinion on this,,,a 2022 cx30 manufactured in Japan, or a 2022 cx30 manufactured in Mexico, as far as quality and reliability, your honest opinion please

  • @keith4669
    @keith4669 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    People forget that in the 90s this car would be slightly above average in size. I love the small windows. It makes me feel cozy, kinda like in a cocoon. I never feel like i need more room. I fit a 68” tv in here, a 7 cubic foot freezer and a leather recliner, not all at once of course. I prefer this to the cx5 because its MORE comfortable. You sit more upright in the cx5. The cx50 is also much more expensive and looks a bit weird. This car is perfect.

  • @FranciscoVargasBubba
    @FranciscoVargasBubba 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My kid is a senior in college and when she's home, she drives her own car. I never have anyone in my back seat. My wife or a friend would bebthe only passengers. This car makes sense for me. I don't want a bigger car, don't need all the extra room.