Is it really worth the extra $4000 (Canadian $$) for the average person. Like someone who won't be desert racing I mean. I feel like that money could be better spent elsewhere, like accessories. The manual adjustment shocks are still ridiculously good. And would be more than enough for 90% of drivers.
Those guys were saying to skip the electronic suspension. They don't know what the hell they're talking about. Fox live valve suspension is unbelievably adjustable to all conditions. Well worth the money in my opinion.
Agree I drove one with and without live suspension and if your going to spend any serious coin, the suspension is where I’d spend it. It’s a world of difference in the ride and handling in all conditions
Obviously you don’t drive very hard 😂 we have melted the internal bypass in the fox shocks too many times to count. Great shocks when they work. But they fail when pushed hard. Even with re-valving/springs etc.
A torque converter based automatic transmission (like in most cars/trucks) would be way more robust, no clutch packs to wear out, and you can still have paddle shift manual selection of gears. I swore I'd never buy a SXS as long as they were STILL using that stupid snowmobile based belt drive CVT. So, I'd DEFINITELY consider a Can-Am since I love in the Southwest desert. Glad to see at least some manufacturers are going to DCT's at least.
I can’t believe this review, I drove both last week on the same trail. The Pro R has suspension modes for each type of terrain, so you don’t have to pay $1,500 every time you want your analog suspension recalibrated. Perhaps if they switched it into the “comfort” setting rather than trail or track, it would have been more comfortable. The Can Am is fun to drive in a straight line, but good luck slowing down. Most brake systems are biased towards the front, the Can Ams are not. It’s sketchy trying to slow down fast in the Can Am. The RZR turns better, stops better, you can see better out of the front, the rear (no giant rear air intake). Not to mention, you lose HP at altitude with the Can Am being its air cooled rather than liquid cooled like the RZR. Anything the Can Am does with the knuckle A-arms, Polaris does with the power steering. The DCT is cool in concept, but people fail to recognize how special the belt system is on the Pro R versus normal belt set ups. If you think I’m biased, please go drive both instead of taking this review at face value.
You loose power on the Pro R with elevation not the Can-Am. The Maverick R is turbo charged so it's less affected by elevation, the Pro R is N/A so it is greatly affected by higher elevation. Also they're both liquid cooled...
It's like a Ford vs Chevy comparison. Mostly how you like the car to feel in the terrain you drive it through. I don't like sitting on a piano bench with my knees banging against the walls and getting fatigued after 3 hrs. of continuous running. That's why I drive a Maverick X3 XRS RR SS around the AZ strip. The Pro R and Mav R didn't move the needle enough for me. I'll drive this until the next gen comes out.
I really liked the test but I don't understand why so many channels like this have to have the music cranked up well beyond just normal level so you have to turn it up to hear the dialog and down when the music comes on?
Learn the workings of the machines better, never mentioned using Dynamic modes or the throttle modes. Changes the Polaris characteristics drastically in each mode
@GrahamSmead the pro r comes with on the fly settings. He could have been in rock mode suspension for all we know. Touching the live valve settings on the pro r doesn't make the car not stock. He could have been in rock suspension mode for all we know the whole time
Why use the base model Maverick R? I get price point but think smart shocks can am would’ve been better comparison. Or xrs non ss that has screen, bigger tires and better shocks. Line of sight obviously hindered by windshield. Feel like I can see much better in Mav R than I could in X3. Seems like a waste of time comparing Polaris top model vs can am base model. Looks like some fun trails and track 👍🏽
You can see better in a Maverick R than the X3, but not better than the RZR. We did remove the Windsheild later and it help immensely. Unfortunately we did not have access to a Smart Shocks version for this shoot. The video does prove the machines are very equally matched and more in-depth testing is in order.
Im not a polaris or canam guy, I honestly would rather Yamaha come up with one of its own... I own a polaris general but I can take the Mav R all day long just going by looks and because of the belt👍
can am definitely has fit and finish issues...the panels are super finicky and they will sometimes not go back in like they should. Have had hands on about 20 of them. They need to dial that up a notch for sure.
@drowheels might want to check your info on that. Lot of people running 37" on a stock Pro R. A few have gone little bigger with a simple clutch kit, but you did say stock machine, so not sure what you consider "stock". And you'll see more 37" tires on Pro Rs as the available selection grows.
My pro r completely fell apart with less than 200 miles on it. One minute we were driving at 30 mph on a flat dirt road, the next we were stopped with a sheared main frame and broken ball joints around $17k in repairs. Very disappointed in polaris.
Exactly.....he fucked that thing up somehow. We've had several polaris units for years with hundreds of hours on them.....belts and tires is IT lol. You don't shear the frame and ball joints by driving on the road hahahha
The mav r is a great machine but its really only a dune/desert car. The pro R can mud and rock crawl too. I have an x3 but im really impressed with the pro r
regular shoulder belts are nice.with my harness belt i can't reach anything on the dash/floor/passenger seat,so I had to shell out for door/roof storage bags so I can reach stuff without undoing the belts.I'm 6' tall.harnesses feel safer but they sure limit your movement in the cab.
And what I don't get is how for a professional dirt wheels mag article/test drive on each car "stock without touching any clicky things", but not give an opinion on how each car handled through whoops/corners on comfort=comfort, track=sport; eco-baja those being comparable ride modes on each. Becsuse i feel like when dialed in to each mode respectively, the polaris shines in corners, hard whoops. Rocks . Crawling... While can am shines in sand, whoops, gravel, hard tracks ..... PS - So DIRTWHEELS MAG / Hi-Torque Pub. If you're looking for a WRITER/EDITOR/ride&wear&product tester or journalist, please let me know
Both cars have engine modes to dial in the power you want. Unfortunately we had very limited time with the two cars together and the video team. The video is meant as a general drivers perspective.
What? The Pro R premium doesn't have electronic shocks. They are very much still available new(surprised Dirt Wheels Mag doesn't know this). Should have been using a Mav R with smart shocks for a apples to apples comparison.
So I'm a 37yr old with a 2022 CanAmXRS rsrr turbo & a 2023 turbo r ultimate 2seater. Both Paid off. The only question I wanted 2 know was which would perform better in the dunes. Bone stock; capability; comfort etc. which he stated wouldn't be tested. Because I'm thinking trading 1 of mine in for a 2seat R or proR. But regardless. Great video. Looking forward to content with cool custom canam or polaris rides in next issues!!!!
But your also using the lowest model mav r so make sure everyone knows that lol, the rzr is like riding a bull when ya get any speed on trails holy hell…
One of these two idiots is supposed to be a professional as he claims and a magazine, editor or journalist. I could understand the newbie complaining about the brakes being a little more spongy in the Can-Am to the Polaris, but the driver should’ve corrected him and explained that in off-road settings and in racing applications, you need a slightly sponger pedal or brake lever on a motorcycle compared to the firm pedal that you’re going to get out of your daily driver automobile. You would hate to be racing through the desert and have to take a hard turn or razor back and hit the brakes and slide, or on a race track hit the brakes and lock them up compared to hitting the brakes and gradually slowing.
The mav r honestly I think is the worst utv on the market if I were to buy a can am I'd take a x3 over a mav r anyday of the week. The pro r is still king and the best all around car. There is a laundry list of things wrong with the mav r and only 3 things I can think of with the pro r. Btw I got receipts on this
The MaV R is way better than the X# in terms of handling and strength in the front end. Front visability is better as is the rear cargo area. The fact that you can shift it and not worry about a CVT belt is another plus. The X3 is a great machine in base model trim. The wider versions need aftermarket upgrades stat.
@hitorquemags I was going to buy a mav r to go with my pro r untill i found out the maverick r has alot of problems it doesn't have navigation, doesn't have speakers because they want you to buy the audio roof but if you buy it your stuck with the stock cage and speaking of stock cage the c pillar doesn't connect to anything, has weak a arms and weak upper radius rods I saw 3 mav Rs break down at utv takeover sand hollow right infront of me 2 were bent a arms and 1 was a broken upper radius rod that broke off and stuck into the tire, soft suspension in the rear that bucks like crazy and people will say you can tune that out but the can am race mav r with tuned suspension still bucks in the rear bad, the tires rub stock inside, speaking of tires good luck finding tires for the stock rims other than the stock ITPs that are on back order for now because of the rim size, ITP from what i know is the only one, it understeers, steering is rough and jerky, its 6 lug so goodluck finding a wide range of wheels and the fit and finish is horrible so make sure to pack duct tape because pieces keep flying off of this car. Btw you have to go to the middle screen for almost everything which is ridiculous why your in the middle of riding it has no switches and you have to buy a different roof in order to run a windshield so what happens if you run a aftermarket cage with a windshield where does the roof intake go? The black and yellow mav r looks like bumble bee from transformers lol and the car is super quiet. Side note the car is always shifting which is annoying and in auto it won't rock climb the power cuts out. I could literally go on alday about how bad this car is the paddle shifters don't turn with the steering wheel, the beeping when the door is open is annoying, the car clunks and makes noises, storage in the cabin is really bad, you either run switches on the panel and have no place for intercom or gmrs radios or you run intercom and gmrs by the shifter and lose a place to run switches because lets face it you want the gmrs and intercom in the same place together in the center dash. it's sad because I love the x3 but the mav r is honestly one of the worst UTVs i think ever made. The pro r has non of those problems the only bad thing I can say about the pro r is stock cage sucks I think, 2022 pro r ball joints suck and the clutch goes out after 1500miles with 35s or atleast it did for me but these are all things you can fix alot of the things I mentioned about the mav r are unfixable. I'd take a x3 over a mav r any day of the week if your looking into a can am. Acouple of other things I forgot to mention about the mav r is it also jumps like crap and lands nose down, it wasn't used in dakar, you can't use fenders on the car especially the front and the aftermarket accessories are very limited compared to the pro r, can't put 37s on it and there Is no 4door version of it yet. When I realized all of these things I couldn't believe can am didn't think of this stuff and polaris did and the even more sad part is the pro r came out before the mav r. The pro r is simple and yet well thought out plus I love the ride command. If the dct breaks after warranty you in it to fix it for $15k. Another thing about the mav r that would be annoying is watching the upper a arms go up and down above the hood while going through whoops. I've driven both and the pro r is still king. Another side note all pro Rs come with harnesses and the smart shox mav r is the only one that comes with harnesses the rest are normal car style seat belts and to upgrade to live valve for the pro r I believe it's $3k and to upgrade to smart shox on the mav r is $10k. Also the pro r you don't have to wear a helmet by law because it's considered a buggy and the mav r you have to wear a helmet. Mav r is trash lol 🤷♂️
Only thing mav r is the width would been cool to get 64 inch width .. mav r is 76 inch wide so realistic it different amd not comparable to anybstock machine ..
Yeah because the fit and finish on a new mav r is top notch 😂😂. Polaris fit and finish has come a long way, i seen them mav r's blowing hood covers off immediately out of the door.
Okay so you bought the top of the line pro r, and then bought the base model maverick R. So truly not a honest opinion more of a biased opinion looks like.
If you are going to do a review you should at least know what you are reviewing. You have a Pro R Ultimate - $41k and a base Maverick R - $35k. You refer to $35k for both and later $37k for Pro R - which is a Premium model with Walker Evans shocks. Do your homework - you are a representing yourself as a professional - be one!
I own a Pro r it's amazing machine the Pro R is harder and not as forgiving in terms of the ride quality but that's only in certain areas. I would most definitely recommended getting a Pro R cause Turbo suck!
That's interesting, I think the can am looks like a race car and the rzr like something a farmer would use to drive out to the field to check on the cows.
@@xToddmcx Hahahahhaa kinda true! I love the x3 but the maverick r is not my cup of tea lol its definitely truck vs race car but the truck in this case is really damn fast
@@Allinoffroad Well I didn't say I'd buy an R. I think both of these SxSs are cool but too big, too heavy, and too expensive, and missing the point of SxSs which is to be light, maneuverable, trail ready, and relatively cheap. So I bought an X3. Maybe RZRs are technically better, I'm not sure, but I don't think they're sleek or pretty. At least lower the roll cage, why do they all have like 2 feet of extra head room.
They can change the mode on the pro r to make it more plush. These guys are not knowledgeable about the 2 machines. The premium and nase do not come with electronic shocks, these two are clueless!!!
Dude thats the lowest nodel maverick r and conparing to top model polaris r ...the maverick is way better if u buy the model for 30 and put 15 into it u can make it a real seriuos machine the poksris woukd beed 20 grand to make conparable
34 grand is stupid !!! my 2016 turbo rzr cost me 19000,,,,it has 3800 miles on it...and will tear the doors off either one of those two .unbelievable what people will pay for a go-cart.....
"I saved $10,000 by not buying electronic shocks, now I can go on 5 trips with my new toy this year!" #guymath lol
I drove both, I like the RZR Pro R acceleration and suspension was better to me. So I bought a 2023 Pro R 4 seater ultimate and love it.
Is it really worth the extra $4000 (Canadian $$) for the average person. Like someone who won't be desert racing I mean.
I feel like that money could be better spent elsewhere, like accessories.
The manual adjustment shocks are still ridiculously good. And would be more than enough for 90% of drivers.
Yeah being in and out of both the Polaris is so much better than a canam
What made you pick the 4 seater over the 2 seater?
Those guys were saying to skip the electronic suspension. They don't know what the hell they're talking about. Fox live valve suspension is unbelievably adjustable to all conditions. Well worth the money in my opinion.
Agree I drove one with and without live suspension and if your going to spend any serious coin, the suspension is where I’d spend it. It’s a world of difference in the ride and handling in all conditions
Obviously you don’t drive very hard 😂 we have melted the internal bypass in the fox shocks too many times to count. Great shocks when they work. But they fail when pushed hard. Even with re-valving/springs etc.
We have a Turbo R. Love it. Have some videos up
I have a Turbo R also like how agile the handling is and engine torque of the turbo twin puts down power better and with more control .
You can get a Pro R in premium package not the ultimate and it has the walker evans shocks not the Fox live valve.
Hard to take them serious when they don’t have common knowledge of the machines.
Seems like they were comparing a 35k machine to another 35k machine. So for the money, you get more with the pro R obviously.
@@joinfullstack base mav R is 35.5k msrp, pro R ultimate is 41k msrp
@@latebraker yes, and if you equip the mav r with all the same amenities of a pro r ultimate, it will cost you 52k
@@Jizden_Mipanz $44,399 for the XRS with smart shocks and you have everything the pro r ultimate has with more HP and a 7 speed DCT
4 cylinder and DCT is where it’s at. The first SxS to put a DCT 4 cylinder combo will dominate all.
I’m sure Polaris is working up a DCT
A torque converter based automatic transmission (like in most cars/trucks) would be way more robust, no clutch packs to wear out, and you can still have paddle shift manual selection of gears. I swore I'd never buy a SXS as long as they were STILL using that stupid snowmobile based belt drive CVT. So, I'd DEFINITELY consider a Can-Am since I love in the Southwest desert. Glad to see at least some manufacturers are going to DCT's at least.
@@HappyTimes024 Any source of this?
I can’t believe this review, I drove both last week on the same trail. The Pro R has suspension modes for each type of terrain, so you don’t have to pay $1,500 every time you want your analog suspension recalibrated. Perhaps if they switched it into the “comfort” setting rather than trail or track, it would have been more comfortable. The Can Am is fun to drive in a straight line, but good luck slowing down. Most brake systems are biased towards the front, the Can Ams are not. It’s sketchy trying to slow down fast in the Can Am. The RZR turns better, stops better, you can see better out of the front, the rear (no giant rear air intake). Not to mention, you lose HP at altitude with the Can Am being its air cooled rather than liquid cooled like the RZR. Anything the Can Am does with the knuckle A-arms, Polaris does with the power steering. The DCT is cool in concept, but people fail to recognize how special the belt system is on the Pro R versus normal belt set ups. If you think I’m biased, please go drive both instead of taking this review at face value.
You loose power on the Pro R with elevation not the Can-Am. The Maverick R is turbo charged so it's less affected by elevation, the Pro R is N/A so it is greatly affected by higher elevation. Also they're both liquid cooled...
polaris looses power with heat
It's like a Ford vs Chevy comparison. Mostly how you like the car to feel in the terrain you drive it through.
I don't like sitting on a piano bench with my knees banging against the walls and getting fatigued after 3 hrs. of continuous running. That's why I drive a Maverick X3 XRS RR SS around the AZ strip. The Pro R and Mav R didn't move the needle enough for me. I'll drive this until the next gen comes out.
AZ strip is a great place to ride out of, mesquite, littlefield
Thank you for doing an honest review and not being biased one over the other!!
I really liked the test but I don't understand why so many channels like this have to have the music cranked up well beyond just normal level so you have to turn it up to hear the dialog and down when the music comes on?
Not sure on the Pro R model but on the Pro XP the bed is designed to hold a tire on the top of the "tub" area
Listening to you it is real clear you are a Can ambassador
Learn the workings of the machines better, never mentioned using Dynamic modes or the throttle modes. Changes the Polaris characteristics drastically in each mode
They mention this was just a base mode test
I can't believe he said the pro r was more rough than the mav r but didn't touch the dynamics settings 🤦♂️ unbelievable
@GrahamSmead the pro r comes with on the fly settings. He could have been in rock mode suspension for all we know. Touching the live valve settings on the pro r doesn't make the car not stock. He could have been in rock suspension mode for all we know the whole time
I have about 8,000 miles on a pro r and still love it
@@motorcyclestig8539 They probably had it in race mode and not Baja mode witch would make it more plush.
Would be nice to get a Polaris Pro R DCT without the smart shocks. Now that would be BA!!!
Why use the base model Maverick R? I get price point but think smart shocks can am would’ve been better comparison. Or xrs non ss that has screen, bigger tires and better shocks. Line of sight obviously hindered by windshield. Feel like I can see much better in Mav R than I could in X3. Seems like a waste of time comparing Polaris top model vs can am base model.
Looks like some fun trails and track 👍🏽
You can see better in a Maverick R than the X3, but not better than the RZR. We did remove the Windsheild later and it help immensely. Unfortunately we did not have access to a Smart Shocks version for this shoot. The video does prove the machines are very equally matched and more in-depth testing is in order.
Not the top Polaris
@@GrahamSmead That was a Pro R Ultimate, what's above that in the Polaris line?
you took the pro r top version and not the top version of the mav r
they acknowledge that, this is a base model mav r and to compete with a pro r is really great.
Unfortunately those are the only brand new, stock models we could get our hands on at the time.
They are comparing what you can get for similar price
ill prob go pro r next time, tired of replacing turbo parts on my x3, turbo, intercooler fan, intercooler..
You’re comparing the top Polaris model to the base Maverick R
They are comparing the two cars that are closest in price.
I am curious where was this video filmed I love all of the vertical trails, looks like a blast!
Great real review without some bias or unfair advantages
"brutally honest" = nothing that bad so we still get invited back to industry events... Impossible to get an unbiased review these days.
you guys ever come to northern idaho?
Test the suspension adjusted for your terrain next time! What's peak dialed performance like?
Just curious why you didn’t use a top trim maverick r with smart shox, I do believe that maverick R is the lowest trim one.
So it would be fair to polaris
They are doing what they can to make polaris look good. They compare apples to pears they're sort of similar but no where near the same
@@kirt244 said the canned ham guy 😂
@richsharp1524 you're not wrong why not buy the better product? Can am beats polaris for the riding I do.
@@kirt244 that’s all that matters my friend 😊 enjoy your machine. They all have their good and bad points. Having fun on any of them is the goal 🥅
Im not a polaris or canam guy, I honestly would rather Yamaha come up with one of its own... I own a polaris general but I can take the Mav R all day long just going by looks and because of the belt👍
Cool trails ! Where is this ?
Clay Peak OHV in New Plymouth, Idaho
People trying to justify non smart shocks is nuts to me. They will never be as good as smart shocks
I heard/read that the Can-Am has fit & finish issues (especially the plastics). Any thoughts? Also the Can-Am tends to "buck"....
can am definitely has fit and finish issues...the panels are super finicky and they will sometimes not go back in like they should. Have had hands on about 20 of them. They need to dial that up a notch for sure.
All UTV's buck on the wrong bump. Can-Am's have always been harder to work on. Fit and Finish is better than an X3 but not perfect.
You're right on both they can't compare with the quality of the Polaris
Have owned a xrs for 8 months fit and finish is poor, but I would never opt for a Polaris cvt machine...NEVER
Here’s a question can the Can am get any bigger tires due to the front arms/spindle?
35" fit stock. Which is the biggest tire any stock machine will run.
35" fit stock.
@drowheels might want to check your info on that. Lot of people running 37" on a stock Pro R. A few have gone little bigger with a simple clutch kit, but you did say stock machine, so not sure what you consider "stock".
And you'll see more 37" tires on Pro Rs as the available selection grows.
@@drowheels Any stock canam.
To the tester, how does your modded Turbo YXZ stack up against these 2 machines ?
Every Magazine comparison ends up the same....... Up to your personal preference as always.
Cool video
Thank you, we enjoyed making it.
It comes down to belt driving or not😮
"BRUTALLY HONEST" Yet the intro is a literal brand ad?
where were you riding at
My pro r completely fell apart with less than 200 miles on it. One minute we were driving at 30 mph on a flat dirt road, the next we were stopped with a sheared main frame and broken ball joints around $17k in repairs. Very disappointed in polaris.
Now that is hilarious.....Just driving along and the frame shears and broke the ball joints. Do you expect anyone would believe this?? 🤣
Exactly.....he fucked that thing up somehow. We've had several polaris units for years with hundreds of hours on them.....belts and tires is IT lol. You don't shear the frame and ball joints by driving on the road hahahha
Where is this track ???
Pro R without smart shocks would be awesome. Would nock that $37k down to $25-$27K. I might even sell my Talon for that.
They do offer that. It's the premium versus the ultimate. But I think it's only about a 3k difference.
The mav r is a great machine but its really only a dune/desert car. The pro R can mud and rock crawl too. I have an x3 but im really impressed with the pro r
Did guy say he prefers regular seat belt vs harnesses?
regular shoulder belts are nice.with my harness belt i can't reach anything on the dash/floor/passenger seat,so I had to shell out for door/roof storage bags so I can reach stuff without undoing the belts.I'm 6' tall.harnesses feel safer but they sure limit your movement in the cab.
jump it next time. the only thing people want to know is which one jumps better.
And what I don't get is how for a professional dirt wheels mag article/test drive on each car "stock without touching any clicky things", but not give an opinion on how each car handled through whoops/corners on comfort=comfort, track=sport; eco-baja those being comparable ride modes on each. Becsuse i feel like when dialed in to each mode respectively, the polaris shines in corners, hard whoops. Rocks . Crawling...
While can am shines in sand, whoops, gravel, hard tracks .....
PS - So DIRTWHEELS MAG / Hi-Torque Pub. If you're looking for a WRITER/EDITOR/ride&wear&product tester or journalist, please let me know
Both cars have engine modes to dial in the power you want. Unfortunately we had very limited time with the two cars together and the video team. The video is meant as a general drivers perspective.
Compare all to fine out the best one
What? The Pro R premium doesn't have electronic shocks. They are very much still available new(surprised Dirt Wheels Mag doesn't know this). Should have been using a Mav R with smart shocks for a apples to apples comparison.
Still cost way too much money.
So I'm a 37yr old with a 2022 CanAmXRS rsrr turbo & a 2023 turbo r ultimate 2seater.
Both Paid off.
The only question I wanted 2 know was which would perform better in the dunes. Bone stock; capability; comfort etc. which he stated wouldn't be tested. Because I'm thinking trading 1 of mine in for a 2seat R or proR.
But regardless.
Great video.
Looking forward to content with cool custom canam or polaris rides in next issues!!!!
You around San Diego?
No dont go based on them they are biased @montanamountainutv
@cautionontherun30 don't go? You mean don't sell the x3? Lol Dessert sxs in biased? What do you mean?
I'm a 46 year old man who wipes boogers on Can ams 😬
I see way more far more rzr then can am in dunes
Questo è un interessante confronto
Where's the brutal part
But your also using the lowest model mav r so make sure everyone knows that lol, the rzr is like riding a bull when ya get any speed on trails holy hell…
Can you put a hitch on them for a small trailer?
But the MavR isn’t their top dog trim. I’m a Polaris guy anyways, can am quality is just poor.
Ur not supposed to even drive them till u adjust the suspension the dont come set from the factory
One of these two idiots is supposed to be a professional as he claims and a magazine, editor or journalist. I could understand the newbie complaining about the brakes being a little more spongy in the Can-Am to the Polaris, but the driver should’ve corrected him and explained that in off-road settings and in racing applications, you need a slightly sponger pedal or brake lever on a motorcycle compared to the firm pedal that you’re going to get out of your daily driver automobile. You would hate to be racing through the desert and have to take a hard turn or razor back and hit the brakes and slide, or on a race track hit the brakes and lock them up compared to hitting the brakes and gradually slowing.
This is rediculous.... If your gonna compare them then get comparable trim levels in each one. Base vs base or top vs top.
The mav r honestly I think is the worst utv on the market if I were to buy a can am I'd take a x3 over a mav r anyday of the week. The pro r is still king and the best all around car. There is a laundry list of things wrong with the mav r and only 3 things I can think of with the pro r. Btw I got receipts on this
The MaV R is way better than the X# in terms of handling and strength in the front end. Front visability is better as is the rear cargo area. The fact that you can shift it and not worry about a CVT belt is another plus. The X3 is a great machine in base model trim. The wider versions need aftermarket upgrades stat.
@hitorquemags I was going to buy a mav r to go with my pro r untill i found out the maverick r has alot of problems it doesn't have navigation, doesn't have speakers because they want you to buy the audio roof but if you buy it your stuck with the stock cage and speaking of stock cage the c pillar doesn't connect to anything, has weak a arms and weak upper radius rods I saw 3 mav Rs break down at utv takeover sand hollow right infront of me 2 were bent a arms and 1 was a broken upper radius rod that broke off and stuck into the tire, soft suspension in the rear that bucks like crazy and people will say you can tune that out but the can am race mav r with tuned suspension still bucks in the rear bad, the tires rub stock inside, speaking of tires good luck finding tires for the stock rims other than the stock ITPs that are on back order for now because of the rim size, ITP from what i know is the only one, it understeers, steering is rough and jerky, its 6 lug so goodluck finding a wide range of wheels and the fit and finish is horrible so make sure to pack duct tape because pieces keep flying off of this car. Btw you have to go to the middle screen for almost everything which is ridiculous why your in the middle of riding it has no switches and you have to buy a different roof in order to run a windshield so what happens if you run a aftermarket cage with a windshield where does the roof intake go? The black and yellow mav r looks like bumble bee from transformers lol and the car is super quiet. Side note the car is always shifting which is annoying and in auto it won't rock climb the power cuts out. I could literally go on alday about how bad this car is the paddle shifters don't turn with the steering wheel, the beeping when the door is open is annoying, the car clunks and makes noises, storage in the cabin is really bad, you either run switches on the panel and have no place for intercom or gmrs radios or you run intercom and gmrs by the shifter and lose a place to run switches because lets face it you want the gmrs and intercom in the same place together in the center dash. it's sad because I love the x3 but the mav r is honestly one of the worst UTVs i think ever made. The pro r has non of those problems the only bad thing I can say about the pro r is stock cage sucks I think, 2022 pro r ball joints suck and the clutch goes out after 1500miles with 35s or atleast it did for me but these are all things you can fix alot of the things I mentioned about the mav r are unfixable. I'd take a x3 over a mav r any day of the week if your looking into a can am. Acouple of other things I forgot to mention about the mav r is it also jumps like crap and lands nose down, it wasn't used in dakar, you can't use fenders on the car especially the front and the aftermarket accessories are very limited compared to the pro r, can't put 37s on it and there Is no 4door version of it yet. When I realized all of these things I couldn't believe can am didn't think of this stuff and polaris did and the even more sad part is the pro r came out before the mav r. The pro r is simple and yet well thought out plus I love the ride command. If the dct breaks after warranty you in it to fix it for $15k. Another thing about the mav r that would be annoying is watching the upper a arms go up and down above the hood while going through whoops. I've driven both and the pro r is still king. Another side note all pro Rs come with harnesses and the smart shox mav r is the only one that comes with harnesses the rest are normal car style seat belts and to upgrade to live valve for the pro r I believe it's $3k and to upgrade to smart shox on the mav r is $10k. Also the pro r you don't have to wear a helmet by law because it's considered a buggy and the mav r you have to wear a helmet. Mav r is trash lol 🤷♂️
@@motorcyclestig8539 wow I’m a Polaris guy but I got tired 😴 reading your response. Hope it ended well 😂
@richsharp1524 so why read it at all!? It wasn't in a response to you lmao. Smh
@@motorcyclestig8539 ha ha ha 😂 I went back and read it man. 🧍♂️ you were right on the money. Good 👍 job
Only thing mav r is the width would been cool to get 64 inch width .. mav r is 76 inch wide so realistic it different amd not comparable to anybstock machine ..
What is he even talking about $10k for electronic controlled shocks?? By my receipt they were $2500 extra
Well, the Maverick's doors don't even close without putting your back into it so...
Maybe yours need adjusting. Ours work fine/
@@hitorquemags I've yet to see one from the factory that actually close without slamming them.
Four cylinders no turbo, thats something i can get behind
Buy the can am period
Line of sight???? The Polaris has no windshield! The can-am has a windshield!!!!!! Come on guys. That's BS
Wow, for doing a review. You don't know the machines.... and suggesting not getting live vaulve.... what a joke. Might and day difference
I still don’t trust can am build quality, better yet a DCT from them. Let’s see how long these last…better have deep pockets
35k machine? more like 46k for a loaded pro r4.. and that's before taxes and any financing.
735 Florence Glen
Polaris is best. Except for engine, tranny, suspension, fit finish, quality, reliability
Yeah because the fit and finish on a new mav r is top notch 😂😂. Polaris fit and finish has come a long way, i seen them mav r's blowing hood covers off immediately out of the door.
@@jelias999ha ha ha can am guys are mostly alike. They are sensitive and love to bash on the old Polaris. Not all of them. Just most can am guys 😂
Ummm…this was a month ago…and the only thing after this is a promo…for fkn face shaver….🤷♂️
Okay so you bought the top of the line pro r, and then bought the base model maverick R. So truly not a honest opinion more of a biased opinion looks like.
If you are going to do a review you should at least know what you are reviewing. You have a Pro R Ultimate - $41k and a base Maverick R - $35k. You refer to $35k for both and later $37k for Pro R - which is a Premium model with Walker Evans shocks. Do your homework - you are a representing yourself as a professional - be one!
Don’t be a Karen.
Why not spend the same amount of money on a CJ and have something worth having
As a can am guy the maverick r is an abomination.
I own a Pro r it's amazing machine the Pro R is harder and not as forgiving in terms of the ride quality but that's only in certain areas. I would most definitely recommended getting a Pro R cause Turbo suck!
372 Darian Bridge
Just can’t get past the awful looks of the can am , I just wish they would put the 4cyl in the pro xp so we can have it in a 64 inch machine
That's interesting, I think the can am looks like a race car and the rzr like something a farmer would use to drive out to the field to check on the cows.
@@xToddmcx
Hahahahhaa kinda true! I love the x3 but the maverick r is not my cup of tea lol its definitely truck vs race car but the truck in this case is really damn fast
@@Allinoffroad Well I didn't say I'd buy an R. I think both of these SxSs are cool but too big, too heavy, and too expensive, and missing the point of SxSs which is to be light, maneuverable, trail ready, and relatively cheap. So I bought an X3. Maybe RZRs are technically better, I'm not sure, but I don't think they're sleek or pretty. At least lower the roll cage, why do they all have like 2 feet of extra head room.
They can change the mode on the pro r to make it more plush. These guys are not knowledgeable about the 2 machines. The premium and nase do not come with electronic shocks, these two are clueless!!!
296 Shaina Greens
Every single review no one can pick a winner.... is this a journalist problem? I thought it was brutally honest? Geez
Dude thats the lowest nodel maverick r and conparing to top model polaris r ...the maverick is way better if u buy the model for 30 and put 15 into it u can make it a real seriuos machine the poksris woukd beed 20 grand to make conparable
Hernandez Christopher Garcia Mary Thomas Mark
Maverick r 64k in canada
Nice job comparing a base model Maverick R to the top model Pro R👎
The X-RS has shocks comprible to the Pro R's
$35k....ouch. That's an expensive toy.
Lopez Thomas Gonzalez Christopher Lewis Mark
Rzr all the way
Pointless video. Drive em like you stole em and youll find a winner. Personally i lean toward the rzr
If you’re worried about gas price, you probably shouldn’t be buying a side by side 😂
Gonzalez Lisa Wilson Jose Hernandez Dorothy
Davis Charles Gonzalez Maria Young Donald
Allen Jennifer Lewis Dorothy Lee Ronald
Taylor Daniel Walker Patricia Lewis Margaret
Williams Sandra Robinson Betty Rodriguez Amy
Thomas Jason Jones Scott Davis Dorothy
Jackson Anthony Davis Edward White Elizabeth
Wilson Scott Davis James Johnson Angela
34 grand is stupid !!! my 2016 turbo rzr cost me 19000,,,,it has 3800 miles on it...and will tear the doors off either one of those two .unbelievable what people will pay for a go-cart.....
The smartshox upgrade is 2k not 10k 😂😂
Pro r turns heads from. The side or anywhere. Lines are a knockout. Can am looks terrible compared
Comparing the top of the line polaris to the base model maverick is fucking stupid. Waste of time
Boring host, bad editing/annoying music, bad comparison based on cost instead of matching trims, and testing top end models with casual riding….
We're not all as fast as you. Thanks for watching.
The music was very annoying. Had to turn it off.
Car .... lol